Effects of acid-reducing agents on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir

Prodrugs as empowering tools in drug discovery and development: recent strategic applications of drug delivery solutions to mitigate challenges associated with lead compounds and drug candidates

The delivery of a drug to a specific organ or tissue at an efficacious concentration is the pharmacokinetic (PK) hallmark of promoting effective pharmacological action at a target site with an acceptable safety profile. Sub-optimal pharmaceutical or ADME profiles of drug candidates, which can often be a function of inherently poor physicochemical properties, pose significant challenges to drug discovery and development teams and may contribute to high compound attrition rates. Medicinal chemists have exploited prodrugs as an informed strategy to productively enhance the profiles of new chemical entities by optimizing the physicochemical, biopharmaceutical, and pharmacokinetic properties as well as selectively delivering a molecule to the site of action as a means of addressing a range of limitations. While discovery scientists have traditionally employed prodrugs to improve solubility and membrane permeability, the growing sophistication of prodrug technologies has enabled a significant expansion of their scope and applications as an empowering tool to mitigate a broad range of drug delivery challenges. Prodrugs have emerged as successful solutions to resolve non-linear exposure, inadequate exposure to support toxicological studies, pH-dependent absorption, high pill burden, formulation challenges, lack of feasibility of developing solid and liquid dosage forms, first-pass metabolism, high dosing frequency translating to reduced patient compliance and poor site-specific drug delivery. During the period 2012-2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 50 prodrugs, which amounts to 13% of approved small molecule drugs, reflecting both the importance and success of implementing prodrug approaches in the pursuit of developing safe and effective drugs to address unmet medical needs.

Improving Drug Delivery While Tailoring Prodrug Activation to Modulate Cmax and Cmin by Optimization of (Carbonyl)oxyalkyl Linker-Based Prodrugs of Atazanavir

Structure-property relationships associated with a series of (carbonyl)oxyalkyl amino acid ester prodrugs of the marketed HIV-1 protease inhibitor atazanavir (1), designed to enhance the systemic drug delivery, were examined. Compared to previously reported prodrugs, optimized candidates delivered significantly enhanced plasma exposure and trough concentration (C_min at 24 h) of 1 in rats while revealing differentiated PK paradigms based on the kinetics of prodrug activation and drug release. Prodrugs incorporating primary amine-containing amino acid promoieties offered the benefit of rapid bioactivation that translated into low circulating levels of the prodrug while delivering a high C_max value of 1. Interestingly, the kinetic profile of prodrug cleavage could be tailored for slower activation by structural modification of the amino terminus to either a tertiary amine or a dipeptide motif, which conferred a circulating depot of the prodrug that orchestrated a sustained release of 1 along with substantially reduced C_max and a further enhanced C_min.

Drug-Drug Interactions With Over-The-Counter Medicines: Mind the Unprescribed

BACKGROUND

This review provides a summary of the currently available clinical data on drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving over-the-counter (OTC) medicines. It aims to educate and increase awareness among health care providers and to support decisions in daily practice.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed using bibliographic databases available through PubMed.gov. An initial structured search was performed using the keywords "drug-drug-interaction AND (over-the-counter OR OTC)," without further restrictions except for the language. The initial results were screened for all described DDIs involving OTC drugs, and further information was gathered specifically on these drugs using dedicated database searches and references found in the bibliography from the initial hits.

RESULTS

From more than 1200 initial hits (1972-June 2021), 408 relevant publications were screened for DDIs involving OTC drugs, leading to 2 major findings: first, certain types of drug regimens are more prone to DDIs or have more serious DDI-related consequences, such as antiretroviral, anti-infective, and oral anticancer therapies. Second, although most DDIs involve OTC drugs as the perpetrators, some prescription drugs (statins or phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors) that currently have OTC status can be identified as the victims in DDIs. The following groups were identified to be frequently involved in DDIs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, food supplements, antacids, proton-pump inhibitors, H2 antihistamines, laxatives, antidiarrheal drugs, and herbal drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The most significant finding was the lack of high-quality evidence for commonly acknowledged interactions. High-quality interaction studies involving different phenotypes in drug metabolism (cytochrome P450) and distribution (transporters) are urgently needed. This should include modern and critical drugs, such as oral anticancer medications and direct oral anticoagulants.

Drug-Drug Interactions with Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnant Women Living with HIV: Are They Different from Non-Pregnant Individuals?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Although the separate effects of drug-drug interactions and pregnancy on antiretroviral drug pharmacokinetics have been widely studied and described, their combined effect is largely unknown. Physiological changes during pregnancy may change the extent or clinical relevance of a drug-drug interaction in a pregnant woman. This review aims to provide a detailed overview of the mechanisms, magnitude, and clinical significance of antiretroviral drug-drug interactions in pregnant women.

METHODS

We performed a literature search and selected studies that compared the magnitude of drug-drug interactions with antiretroviral drugs in pregnant vs non-pregnant women.

RESULTS

Forty-eight papers examining drug-drug interactions during pregnancy were selected, of which the majority focused on pharmacokinetic boosting. Other selected studies examined the drug-drug interactions between efavirenz and lumefantrine, efavirenz and tuberculosis drugs, etravirine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, atazanavir and tenofovir disoproxil, and mefloquine and nevirapine in pregnant compared to non-pregnant women. The clinical significance of antiretroviral drug-drug interactions changed during pregnancy from a minimal effect to a contra-indication. In almost all cases, the clinical significance of a drug-drug interaction was more relevant in pregnant women, owing to the combined effects of pregnancy-induced physiological changes and drug-drug interactions leading to a lower absolute drug exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple studies show that the clinical relevance of a drug-drug interaction can change during pregnancy. Unfortunately, many potential interactions have not been studied in pregnancy, which may place pregnant women living with human immunodeficiency virus and their newborns at risk.

(Carbonyl)oxyalkyl linker-based amino acid prodrugs of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor atazanavir that enhance oral bioavailability and plasma trough concentration

We describe the design, synthesis and pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation of a series of amino acid-based prodrugs of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor atazanavir (1) derivatized on the pharmacophoric secondary alcohol using a (carbonyl)oxyalkyl linker. Prodrugs of 1 incorporating simple (carbonyl)oxyalkyl-based linkers and a primary amine in the promoiety were found to exhibit low chemical stability. However, chemical stability was improved by modifying the primary amine moiety to a tertiary amine, resulting in a 2-fold enhancement of exposure in rats following oral dosing compared to dosing of the parent drug 1. Further refinement of the linker resulted in the discovery of 22 as a prodrug that delivered the parent 1 to rat plasma with a 5-fold higher AUC and 67-fold higher C₂₄ when compared to oral administration of the parent drug. The PK profile of 22 indicated that plasma levels of this prodrug were higher than that of the parent, providing a more sustained release of 1 in vivo.

Effects of medicines used to treat gastrointestinal diseases on the pharmacokinetics of coadministered drugs: a PEARRL Review

OBJECTIVES

Drugs used to treat gastrointestinal diseases (GI drugs) are widely used either as prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) medications and belong to both the 10 most prescribed and 10 most sold OTC medications worldwide. The objective of this review article is to discuss the most frequent interactions between GI and other drugs, including identification of the mechanisms behind these interactions, where possible.

KEY FINDINGS

Current clinical practice shows that in many cases, these drugs are administered concomitantly with other drug products. Due to their metabolic properties and mechanisms of action, the drugs used to treat gastrointestinal diseases can change the pharmacokinetics of some coadministered drugs. In certain cases, these interactions can lead to failure of treatment or to the occurrence of serious adverse events. The mechanism of interaction depends highly on drug properties and differs among therapeutic categories. Understanding these interactions is essential to providing recommendations for optimal drug therapy.

SUMMARY

Interactions with GI drugs are numerous and can be highly significant clinically in some cases. While alterations in bioavailability due to changes in solubility, dissolution rate, GI transit and metabolic interactions can be (for the most part) easily identified, interactions that are mediated through other mechanisms, such as permeability or microbiota, are less well-understood. Future work should focus on characterising these aspects.

Coupling of an Acyl Migration Prodrug Strategy with Bio-activation To Improve Oral Delivery of the HIV-1 Protease Inhibitor Atazanavir

HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs), which include atazanavir (ATV, 1), remain important medicines to treat HIV-1 infection. However, they are characterized by poor oral bioavailability and a need for boosting with a pharmacokinetic enhancer, which results in additional drug-drug interactions that are sometimes difficult to manage. We investigated a chemo-activated, acyl migration-based prodrug design approach to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of 1 but failed to obtain improved oral bioavailability over dosing the parent drug in rats. This strategy was refined by conjugating the amine with a promoiety designed to undergo bio-activation, as a means of modulating the subsequent chemo-activation. This culminated in a lead prodrug that (1) yielded substantially better oral drug delivery of 1 when compared to the parent itself, the simple acyl migration-based prodrug, and the corresponding simple l-Val prodrug, (2) acted as a depot which resulted in a sustained release of the parent drug in vivo, and (3) offered the benefit of mitigating the pH-dependent absorption associated with 1, thereby potentially reducing the risk of decreased bioavailability with concurrent use of stomach-acid-reducing drugs.

A review of drug-drug interactions in older HIV-infected patients

INTRODUCTION

The number of older HIV-infected people is growing due to increasing life expectancies resulting from the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Both HIV and aging increase the risk of other comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and some malignancies, leading to greater challenges in managing HIV with other conditions. This results in complex medication regimens with the potential for significant drug-drug interactions and increased morbidity and mortality. Area covered: We review the metabolic pathways of ART and other medications used to treat medical co-morbidities, highlight potential areas of concern for drug-drug interactions, and where feasible, suggest alternative approaches for treating these conditions as suggested from national guidelines or articles published in the English language. Expert commentary: There is limited evidence-based data on ART drug interactions, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the older HIV-infected population. Choosing and maintaining effective ART regimens for older adults requires consideration of side effect profile, individual comorbidities, interactions with concurrent prescriptions and non-prescription medications and supplements, dietary patterns with respect to dosing, pill burden and ease of dosing, cost and affordability, patient preferences, social situation, and ART resistance history. Practitioners must remain vigilant for potential drug interactions and intervene when there is a potential for harm.

Design strategies in the prodrugs of HIV-1 protease inhibitors to improve the pharmaceutical properties

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is currently the most effective treatment for HIV-1 infection. HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) are an important component of some regimens of cART. However, PIs are known for sub-optimal ADME properties, resulting in poor oral bioavailability. This often necessitates high drug doses, combination with pharmacokinetic enhancers and/or special formulations in order to effectively deliver PIs, which may lead to a high pill burden and reduced patient compliance. As a remedy, improving the ADME properties of existing drugs via prodrug and other approaches has been pursued in addition to the development of next generation PIs with improved pharmacokinetic, resistance and side effect profiles. Phosphate prodrugs have been explored to address the solubility-limiting absorption and high excipient load. Prodrug design to target carrier-mediated drug delivery has also been explored. Amino acid prodrugs have been shown to improve permeability by engaging active transport mechanisms, reduce efflux and mitigate first pass metabolism while acyl migration prodrugs have been shown to improve solubility. Prodrug design efforts have led to the identification of one marketed agent, fosamprenavir, and clinical studies with two other prodrugs. Several of the reported approaches lack detailed in vivo characterization and hence the potential preclinical or clinical benefits of these approaches are yet to be fully determined.

Meal Effects Confound Attempts to Counteract Rabeprazole-Induced Hypochlorhydria Decreases in Atazanavir Absorption

PURPOSE

Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions exist between gastric acid-reducing agents and certain weakly basic drugs that rely on acidic environments for optimal oral absorption. In this study, we examine whether the administration of betaine hydrochloride under fed conditions can enhance the absorption of atazanavir, an HIV-1 protease inhibitor, during pharmacologically-induced hypochlorhydria.

METHODS

In this randomized, single-dose, 3 period, crossover study healthy volunteers received ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg) alone, following pretreatment with the proton pump inhibitor rabeprazole (20 mg twice daily), and with 1500 mg of betaine HCl after rabeprazole pretreatment. Atazanavir was administered with a light meal and gastric pH was monitored using the Heidelberg Capsule.

RESULTS

Pretreatment with rabeprazole resulted in significant reductions in atazanavir C_max (p < 0.01) and AUC_0-last (p < 0.001) (71 and 70%, respectively), and modest decreases in ritonavir C_max and AUC_last (p < 0.01) (40% and 41%, respectively). The addition of betaine HCl restored 13% of ATV C_max and 12% of AUC_last lost due to rabeprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-administration of rabeprazole with atazanavir resulted in significant decreases in atazanavir exposure. The addition of betaine HCl did not sufficiently mitigate the loss of ATV exposure observed during RAB-induced hypochlorhydria. Meal effects lead to a marked difference in the outcome of betaine HCl on atazanavir exposure than we previously reported for dasatanib under fasting conditions.

Prediction of area under the concentration-time curve for lopinavir from peak or trough lopinavir concentrations in patients receiving lopinavir-ritonavir therapy

PURPOSE

A "single time point" strategy for predicting the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for lopinavir in patients receiving ritonavir-boosted lopinavir therapy was investigated.

METHODS

Linear regression equations describing the relationships of lopinavir peak and trough concentrations to lopinavir AUC values were established using pharmacokinetic data from published studies of patients or healthy subjects receiving lopinavir and ritonavir at standard dosages. The resulting "trough-AUC model" and "peak-AUC model" were used to predict lopinavir AUC values in the evaluated study populations (total n = 479); those values were then compared with reported AUC values.

RESULTS

Lopinavir peak or trough concentrations were strongly correlated with lopinavir AUC values (r = 0.9947 and r = 0.9541, respectively). For about 94% of calculations using the peak-AUC model and 87% of calculations using the trough-AUC model, differences between predicted and observed AUC values were in the range of 0.76-1.5 fold; the associated r values were 0.9514 (p < 0.001) and 0.9345 (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean absolute predictive error was less than 6% with the use of either the peak-AUC model or the trough-AUC model, with corresponding values for root-mean-square error of 17.6% and 23.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Equations incorporating lopinavir peak and trough concentrations were found to satisfactorily predict lopinavir AUC values in data sets describing patients receiving lopinavir with ritonavir boosting. Variability in predictions was higher with use of the trough-AUC model.

Drug–Drug Interactions: Regulatory and Theoretical Considerations, and an Industry Perspective

In this review, a number of theoretical bases and regulatory framework are presented for drug–drug interactions (DDIs), with emphasis on those related to absorption and distribution. Also presented is an industry perspective on how to approach these issues in support of drug development. Overall, holistic integration and understanding of the pharmaceutical (e.g., pH-dependent solubility) and pharmacological (e.g., gastrointestinal physiology and therapeutic margin) profiles, as well as pharmacokinetics and underlying absorption and disposition determinants (e.g., clearance, volume of distribution, permeability and protein binding) of drug candidates in various clinical setting should be considered as this can be valuable in ensuring the safe and effective use of new drugs.

A novel ritonavir paediatric powder formulation is bioequivalent to ritonavir oral solution with a similar food effect

BACKGROUND

A novel ritonavir oral powder formulation has been developed to eliminate the alcohol and propylene glycol contents in the current ritonavir oral solution for paediatric use. Two clinical studies were conducted to assess the bioequivalence of the powder formulation to the marketed oral solution and to evaluate the effect of food and vehicles on bioavailability.

METHODS

Study 1 was a randomized, partial-crossover, 4-period study in 48 subjects. Regimens included: oral solution under moderate-fat conditions, powder formulation in water under fasting, moderate-fat or high-fat conditions, and powder formulation in chocolate milk or pudding under moderate-fat conditions. Study 2 was a randomized, crossover, 4-period study in 24 subjects. Subjects were randomized to a sequence of the oral solution and powder formulation in water, infant formula and apple sauce, all under moderate-fat conditions. Bioavailability comparisons were assessed by the 90% CIs for the geometric least-squares mean ratios.

RESULTS

Ritonavir powder formulation in water was found to be bioequivalent to the marketed oral solution. Ritonavir powder formulation administered in chocolate milk, pudding, infant formula or apple sauce was bioequivalent to the powder formulation administered in water. Compared with fasting conditions, moderate-fat and high-fat meals were associated with approximately 25-40% and 35-50% reduction in ritonavir concentrations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel ritonavir powder formulation is bioequivalent to marketed ritonavir oral solution under moderate-fat conditions with a similar effect of meals. None of the vehicles tested negatively affected the bioavailability, which suggests the potential for use of a broad range of vehicles for dose preparation.

Effect of meal and antisecretory agents on the pharmacokinetics of danoprevir/ritonavir in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of a low- and high-fat meal and co-administration of ranitidine or omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted danoprevir (DNVr).

METHODS

In this randomised, open-label, cross-over study, healthy subjects received a single dose of DNVr. In group 1, DNVr was administered while fasting or with a low-fat or high-fat meal. In group 2, DNVr was administered alone or with ranitidine 150 mg (single dose) or omeprazole 40 mg (multiple doses).

KEY FINDINGS

Group 1 (n = 16): relative to fasting conditions, food slightly prolonged absorption but did not alter the extent of absorption. DNV area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and plasma concentration 12 h after administration (C12h) geometric mean ratios (GMR%) (90% confidence interval (CI)) with a low-fat meal were 92.3 (80.2-106), 61.8 (51.0-74.9) and 95.2 (80.9-112), versus fasting conditions, and with a high-fat meal 99.5 (86.4-115), 58.9 (48.5-71.6) and 101 (86.0-119). Group 2 (n = 13): ranitidine or omeprazole had no clinically significant effect on DNV pharmacokinetics. DNV AUC0-∞, Cmax and C12h GMR% (90% CI) with ranitidine: 81.9 (68.3-98.1), 104 (86.9-123) and 87.5 (69.3-111), and with omeprazole: 83.0 (67.4-102), 92.7 (70.6-122) and 93.3 (65.6-133).

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of clinically relevant effects of food, ranitidine or omeprazole on DNVr pharmacokinetics suggests that DNVr can be administered without regard to meals and in combination with H2 antagonists or proton pump inhibitors.

Lack of a clinically significant drug-drug interaction in healthy volunteers between the HCV protease inhibitor boceprevir and the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole

OBJECTIVES

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can limit the solubility of concomitant drugs, which can lead to decreased absorption and exposure. Reduced efficacy can be a consequence and in the case of an antimicrobial agent this may contribute to development of resistance. Patients chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus can be treated with a boceprevir-containing regimen and it is relevant to know if interactions between PPIs and boceprevir exist. This study was designed to investigate the influence of a frequently used PPI, omeprazole, on the pharmacokinetics of boceprevir and vice versa.

METHODS

In this open-label, three-period, randomized, cross-over, Phase I study, healthy subjects were randomly assigned to 40 mg of omeprazole once daily for 5 days, 800 mg of boceprevir three times daily for 5 days and 40 mg of omeprazole once daily + 800 mg of boceprevir three times daily for 5 days, or the same treatment in a different order. Every treatment was followed by a wash-out period. At day 5 of every treatment pharmacokinetic blood sampling was performed for 8 h after medication intake. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01470690.

RESULTS

All 24 subjects (15 males) completed the study and no serious adverse events were reported. Geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to 8 h (AUC0-8) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of boceprevir with omeprazole versus boceprevir alone were 0.92 (0.87-0.97) and 0.94 (0.86-1.02), respectively. For omeprazole these values were 1.06 (0.90-1.25) for AUC0-8 and 1.03 (0.85-1.26) for Cmax for the combination versus omeprazole alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole did not have a clinically significant effect on boceprevir exposure, and boceprevir did not affect omeprazole exposure.

Atazanavir pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety in pregnancy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

For some antiretroviral therapies, drug concentrations are reduced during pregnancy, potentially compromising effective virological suppression.

METHODS

Data on atazanavir boosted with ritonavir in pregnancy are reviewed.

RESULTS

With standard atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once-daily dosing: atazanavir area-under-the-concentration-time curves were reduced during pregnancy in most studies, but overall interpretation differed according to the data used for comparison; atazanavir concentration 24 h post-dose was maintained >150 ng/ml in 97.6% of women; no instance of mother-to-child transmission occurred in treatment-adherent mothers; and infant hyperbilirubinaemia was not elevated beyond levels expected in the neonatal period.

CONCLUSIONS

With concurrent medications that reduce atazanavir drug concentrations, optimal therapy during pregnancy may require once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg; however, using this dose during the third trimester doubled maternal grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinaemia rates.

Drug interactions--principles, examples and clinical consequences

BACKGROUND

Drug interactions can have desired, reduced or unwanted effects. The probability of interactions increases with the number of drugs taken. The high rate of prescribed drugs in elderly patients (65-year-old patients take an average of 5 drugs) increases the likelihood of drug interactions and thus the risk that drugs themselves can be the cause of hospitalization. According to meta-analyses, up to 7% of hospitalizations are drug-related.

METHODS

Selective literature review.

RESULTS

Drug interactions occur on pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic levels. Examples of pharmacodynamic interactions are simultaneous administration of a NSAID and phenprocoumon (additive interaction), or of aspirin and ibuprofen (antagonistic interaction). Pharmacokinetic interactions occur at the levels of absorption (e.g., levothyroxine and neutralizing antacids), elimination (e.g., digoxin and macrolides), and metabolism, as in the competition for cytochrome P450 enzymes (e.g., SSRIs and certain beta-blockers).

CONCLUSION

The systematic knowledge of drug interaction, in particular on the level of absorption, elimination, transport and drug metabolism may help to prevent adverse effects. Predicting pharmacodynamic interactions often demands a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of effect. Electronic prescribing systems are helpful.

Quantification of human hepatocyte cytochrome P450 enzymes and transporters induced by HIV protease inhibitors using newly validated LC-MS/MS cocktail assays and RT-PCR

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs) produce profound and unpredictable drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that cannot be explained fully by their inhibition/inactivation of CYP3A enzymes. Delineating and quantifying the CYPs and transporters inducible by PIs are crucial in developing an integrative mechanistic understanding and prediction of PI-based DDIs. To do so, two LC-MS/MS cocktail assays were modified and validated simultaneously to quantify the CYP activity of CYP3A, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 1A, 2E1, 2A6 and 2D6 enzymes. These new assays were applied to evaluate the induction potential of eight PIs in microsomes isolated from PI-treated human hepatocytes. The mRNA expression of these CYPs and transporters (OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OATP1A2, MDR1, MRP2 and MRP4) was also evaluated using relative RT-PCR. The majority of PIs were net inducers of CYP3As and 2B6 at both the mRNA and activity level (> 2-fold), while ritonavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir or lopinavir did not induce CYP3A activity (< 2-fold), presumably due to CYP3A inactivation. OATP1B1 and MDR1 were the only two hepatic transporters induced (> 2-fold) by the PIs. Amprenavir was the most potent net inducer. In conclusion, our validated cocktail assays can be implemented to comprehensively quantify CYP activities in human liver microsomes and hepatocyte studies. The results also provide the much needed data on the net induction potential of the PIs for hepatic CYPs and transporters. A qualitative agreement was observed between our results and published PI-based DDIs, suggesting that human hepatocytes are a useful platform for more extensive and quantitative in vitro-in vivo prediction of PI-based DDIs.

[Adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors: should we worry about long-term exposure?]

Long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is becoming more prevalent. Although they are well tolerated in the short term, serious concerns about long-term use have arisen. Recent data suggest that the latter is associated with an increased risk for osteoporotic fracture (especially vertebral), Clostridium difficile infection and rebound acid hypersecretion after treatment discontinuation. Acute interstitial nephritis is rare but may progress to chronic renal failure. An increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia has not been established in the general population and seems limited to the most vulnerable patients. Consistent data are still missing to correctly assess the risk of iron deficiency, vitamin B12 deficiency or hypomagnesaemia and the risk of digestive malignant diseases, despite the pathophysiological basis that exists concerning gastric malignancy. Many drug interactions can occur on long-term treatment, including some that imply the cytochrome P450 enzymes. Finally, the risk-benefit balance for a chronic PPI use in children seems unfavorable in most cases.

Clinically significant drug interactions with antacids: an update

One may consider that drug-drug interactions (DDIs) associated with antacids is an obsolete topic because they are prescribed less frequently by medical professionals due to the advent of drugs that more effectively suppress gastric acidity (i.e. histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists [H2RAs] and proton pump inhibitors [PPIs]). Nevertheless, the use of antacids by ambulant patients may be ever increasing, because they are freely available as over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. Antacids consisting of weak basic substances coupled with polyvalent cations may alter the rate and/or the extent of absorption of concomitantly administered drugs via different mechanisms. Polyvalent cations in antacid formulations may form insoluble chelate complexes with drugs and substantially reduce their bioavailability. Clinical studies demonstrated that two classes of antibacterials (tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones) are susceptible to clinically relevant DDIs with antacids through this mechanism. Countermeasures against this type of DDI include spacing out the dosing interval - taking antacid either 4 hours before or 2 hours after administration of these antibacterials. Bisphosphonates may be susceptible to DDIs with antacids by the same mechanism, as described in the prescription information of most bisphosphonates, but no quantitative data about the DDIs are available. For drugs with solubility critically dependent on pH, neutralization of gastric fluid by antacids may alter the dissolution of these drugs and the rate and/or extent of their absorption. However, the magnitude of DDIs elicited by antacids through this mechanism is less than that produced by H2RAs or PPIs; therefore, the clinical relevance of such DDIs is often obscure. Magnesium ions contained in some antacid formulas may increase gastric emptying, thereby accelerating the rate of absorption of some drugs. However, the clinical relevance of this is unclear in most cases because the difference in plasma drug concentration observed after dosing shortly disappears. Recent reports have indicated that some of the molecular-targeting agents such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitors dasatinib and imatinib, and the thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag may be susceptible to DDIs with antacids. Finally, the recent trend of developing OTC drugs as combination formulations of an antacid and an H2RA is a concern because these drugs will increase the risk of DDIs by dual mechanisms, i.e. a gastric pH-dependent mechanism by H2RAs and a cation-mediated chelation mechanism by antacids.

Nuclear receptor-mediated induction of CYP450 by antiretrovirals: functional consequences of NR1I2 (PXR) polymorphisms and differential prevalence in whites and sub-Saharan Africans

BACKGROUND

Antiretroviral therapy including HIV protease inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors can both inhibit and induce expression of cytochrome P450s, potentially leading to drug interactions. However, information is lacking on the impact of genetic polymorphism on this interaction.

METHODS

This study examines the prevalence of 33 polymorphisms in NR1I2 (pregnane X receptor [PXR]), CYP3A4, and CYP2B6 in 1013 white and sub-Saharan African patients with HIV; explores the inductive ability of 16 antiretrovirals on CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 promoter activity through nuclear receptors PXR and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR); and evaluates the influence of naturally occurring PXR genetic variants on antiretroviral activation.

RESULTS

Seventeen polymorphisms were present at different frequencies between the two ethnicities. Darunavir, fosamprenavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, tipranavir, efavirenz, and abacavir increased CYP3A4 and/or CYP2B6 promoter activity, some through constitutive androstane receptor but mainly through PXR. Addition of low-dose ritonavir enhanced levels of CYP promoter activity for several protease inhibitors. Some PXR variants displayed lower fosamprenavir- and lopinavir-induced CYP3A4 promoter activity than the PXR reference sequence, whereas efavirenz and nelfinavir induction was unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of NR1I2 polymorphisms can alter the induction of CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 promoter activity, potentially adding to the unpredictable nature of antiretroviral drug interactions. These polymorphisms differ in prevalence between whites and sub-Saharan Africans.

Management of HIV infection in treatment-naive patients: a review of the most current recommendations

PURPOSE

The most current guidelines issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) on the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in treatment-naive patients are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Treatment guidelines are updated frequently because of the emergence of data demonstrating the risks and benefits of antiretroviral therapy. The DHHS guidelines strongly recommend initiating therapy in patients with certain conditions regardless of CD4 cell count and in patients with CD4 cell counts of <350 cells/mm(3). Although supporting data are less definitive, treatment is also recommended for patients with CD4 cell counts of 350-500 cells/mm(3). Treatment for patients with CD4 cell counts of >500 cells/mm(3) is controversial. Although cumulative observational data and biological evidence support treatment at higher CD4 cell counts, randomized controlled trial data to support this are not available, and the risk of antiretroviral toxicities, resistance, non-adherence, and cost should be considered in individual patients. The preferred regimens have been consolidated to four options, including a dual-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone (tenofovir plus emtricitabine) with a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (efavirenz), a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (atazanavir plus ritonavir or darunavir plus ritonavir), or an integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (raltegravir). Regimens are classified as alternative or acceptable when they have potential safety or efficacy concerns, have higher pill burdens, or require more-frequent administration compared with preferred regimens.

CONCLUSION

The DHHS 2011 guidelines advocate earlier antiretroviral therapy initiation than recommended in recent years, and preferred regimens have been refined to maximize efficacy, safety, and quality of life for treatment-naive HIV-infected patients.

Pharmacokinetics of the HIV integrase inhibitor S/GSK1349572 co-administered with acid-reducing agents and multivitamins in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of pH-altering agents on S/GSK1349572 exposure in healthy subjects.

METHODS

S/GSK1349572 is an unboosted, once-daily, next-generation HIV integrase inhibitor. In the first study, 16 subjects received four single-dose treatments: (i) S/GSK1349572 50 mg; (ii) S/GSK1349572 50 mg with a multivitamin (MVI; One A Day Maximum); (iii) S/GSK1349572 50 mg with a liquid antacid (Maalox Advanced Maximum Strength); and (iv) S/GSK1349572 50 mg 2 h before an antacid. In the second study, 12 subjects received a single dose of S/GSK1349572 alone and on day 5 of omeprazole.

RESULTS

All treatments were well tolerated. MVI co-administration modestly decreased S/GSK1349572 AUC by 33%. Concurrent antacid co-administration reduced S/GSK1349572 AUC by 74% and staggered antacid dosing significantly diminished this interaction, with a reduction in S/GSK1349572 AUC of 26%. Omeprazole did not significantly affect S/GSK1349572 exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

S/GSK1349572 can be taken with proton pump inhibitors and MVIs without dose adjustment but should be administered 2 h before or 6 h after antacids.

Dexlansoprazole in the Treatment of Esophagitis and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

OBJECTIVE:

To describe the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of dexlansoprazole in the treatment of heartburn associated with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healing and maintenance of healing of all grades of erosive esophagitis (EE).

DATA SOURCES:

Literature searches were conducted using MEDLINE Ovid (1950-December 2009, week 4) and EMBASE (1980-2009, week 53) using the term dexlansoprazole. References from articles obtained from the search were evaluated for other relevant citations.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:

All articles published in English evaluating the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effect profile of dexlansoprazole were selected for inclusion.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Dexlansoprazole is the newest addition to the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) class and is approved for the treatment of heartburn associated with nonerosive GERD, healing of all grades of EE, as well as maintenance of healing of EE. Dexlansoprazole has a unique dual delayed-release formulation, which releases drug at 2 points in time; the first peak occurs 1-2 hours after administration and the second occurs within 4-5 hours after administration. In Phase 3 trials conducted in adults, researchers found that dexlansoprazole increases rates of healing of EE, as well as the maintenance of healing, compared to lansoprazole. Relief of heartburn symptoms was comparable among the dexlansoprazole and lansoprazole treatment groups. Common adverse effects of dexlansoprazole are similar to those of the other PPIs, including diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, upper respiratory infection, vomiting, and flatulence.

CONCLUSIONS:

Dexlansoprazole provides another treatment option for the management of EE and symptoms of heartburn. Considering that the cost of dexlansoprazole is not favorable, further studies evaluating potential advantages over other agents are necessary to define the role of dexlansoprazole in the treatment of these conditions.

Evaluation of Continuation of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis at Hospital Discharge

Purpose

Stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD) can adversely affect patient morbidity and mortality. The use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in patients with no risk factors for clinically important bleeding, however, is contributing to health care-related adverse events, drug interactions, and costs. The objective was to determine the percentage of hospitalized patients who receive SUP without an approved indication and to evaluate the financial impact of inappropriate prescribing as well as the risk for significant drug-drug interactions.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed of hospitalized adult cardiology, family medicine, and internal medicine patients between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007. Prescribing of acid suppressive therapy (AST) during hospital admission and indications for SUP were evaluated. Concomitant medications, cost of therapy, and discharge medications were assessed as secondary outcomes.

Results

Of the 4,603 patients admitted during the study period, 418 were randomly selected for study inclusion. Approximately 53% (221/418) of the selected patients received SUP during hospital admission, 93% (206/221) of whom had no indication for prophylaxis. Of those who continued AST at discharge (14%; 31/221), 84% (26/31) had no approved indication. Overuse of SUP resulted in 77 potential drug-drug interactions and an estimated 30-day outpatient cost of $37,950 for patients receiving these medications at discharge.

Conclusion

SUP is frequently prescribed to non–critically ill patients when the risk of SRMD is low. Use of SUP for patients who do not meet evidence-based criteria appears to contribute to increased health care expenditures, potential adverse events, and drug interactions.