Single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of pegylated interferon-alpha2b in patients with chronic renal dysfunction

Bioconjugation strategies and clinical implications of Interferon-bioconjugates

Interferons (IFN) are immunomodulating, antiviral and antiproliferative cytokines for treatment of multiple indications, including cancer, hepatitis, and autoimmune disease. The first IFNs were discovered in 1957, first approved in 1986, and are nowadays listed in the WHO model list of essential Medicines. Three classes of IFNs are known; IFN-α2a and IFN-β belonging to type-I IFNs, IFN-γ a type-II IFN approved for some hereditary diseases and IFN-λs, which form the newest class of type-III IFNs. IFN-λs were discovered in the last decade with fascinating yet under discovered pharmaceutical potential. This article reviews available IFN drugs, their field and route of application, while also outlining available and future strategies for bioconjugation to further optimize pharmaceutical and clinical performances of all three available IFN classes.

Recommendations for the use of pegylated interferon-α in the treatment of classical myeloproliferative neoplasms

The classical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are uncommon clonal haemopoietic malignancies characterised by excessive production of mature blood cells. Clinically, they are associated with thrombosis, haemorrhage, varying degrees of constitutional disturbance and a risk of progression to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukaemia. Many of the disease manifestations may be ameliorated by treatment with interferon-α (IFN), but its use in Australian MPN patients has been limited due to the inconvenience of frequent injections and side-effects. The pegylated form of IFN is a long-acting preparation, which is better tolerated, and its Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing is likely to lead to increased usage. We review the literature on risks and benefits of IFN treatment for MPN, suggest criteria for patient selection in each of these diseases and discuss strategies to manage the side-effects of pegylated IFN.

Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir in Patients with HCV and Severe Renal Impairment

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is more prevalent among patients who have chronic kidney disease than among those who do not have the disease. Patients with chronic kidney disease who also have HCV infection are at higher risk for progression to end-stage renal disease than those who have chronic kidney disease without HCV infection. Patients with both HCV infection and advanced chronic kidney disease have limited treatment options.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with the combination of the NS3/4A protease inhibitor glecaprevir and the NS5A inhibitor pibrentasvir for 12 weeks in adults who had HCV genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 infection and also had compensated liver disease (with or without cirrhosis) with severe renal impairment, dependence on dialysis, or both. Patients had stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease and either had received no previous treatment for HCV infection or had received previous treatment with interferon or pegylated interferon, ribavirin, sofosbuvir, or a combination of these medications. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 104 patients enrolled in the trial, 52% had genotype 1 infection, 16% had genotype 2 infection, 11% had genotype 3 infection, 19% had genotype 4 infection, and 2% had genotype 5 or 6 infection. The sustained virologic response rate was 98% (102 of 104 patients; 95% confidence interval, 95 to 100). No patients had virologic failure during treatment, and no patients had a virologic relapse after the end of treatment. Adverse events that were reported in at least 10% of the patients were pruritus, fatigue, and nausea. Serious adverse events were reported in 24% of the patients. Four patients discontinued the trial treatment prematurely because of adverse events; three of these patients had a sustained virologic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir for 12 weeks resulted in a high rate of sustained virologic response in patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease and HCV infection. (Funded by AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02651194 .).

The practical management of chronic hepatitis C infection in Japan - dual therapy of daclatasvir + asunaprevir

Without treatment, many of the 200 million people worldwide with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection will develop cirrhosis or liver cancer. Japan was the first nation to approve an interferon-free therapy for HCV, and sustained viral response (SVR) rates >90% have been achieved with asunaprevir, a protease inhibitor, plus daclatasvir, an inhibitor of the non-structural 5A (NS5A) protein. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the results from both clinical trials and real world experience with asunaprevir and daclatasvir therapy focused primarily on Japan. A literature search using the keywords 'asunaprevir,' 'daclatasvir,' 'interferon-free therapy,' and 'direct-acting antiviral drugs' was initially used to select relevant literature for inclusion in the review. Expert commentary: While not approved in the United States, dual therapy with asunaprevir plus daclatasvir has already been successfully used in Japan and throughout East Asia to treat many thousands of patients. Pre-existing or treatment-emergent NS5A-Y93 or -L31 resistance-associated variants (RAVs) may lead to viral breakthrough, and alternative therapies should be considered for these patients, but patients who harbor NS5A RAVs only at low frequency are likely to achieve SVR. The therapy has also been shown to be safe and effective with renal dysfunction or liver cirrhosis.

Treatment of HCV in renal transplant patients with peginterferon and ribavirin: long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

In addition to the observation of an increased viremia among patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who undergo renal transplantation, fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity have been noted to worsen comparing pre- and post-renal transplantation liver biopsies in some of these patients. Apart from the reported reduced patient and allograft survival rates, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, de novo glomerulonephritis, and an increased overall risk of infection have been observed. However, antiviral therapy for HCV is generally considered contraindicated among patients with solid organ transplants, with the main worry being the risk of acute rejection in relation to the use of interferon. We reported the long-term outcome of four renal transplant patients with chronic HCV infection who received peginterferon-based therapy.

METHODS

We collected the long-term follow-up data of four patients who completed the therapy with peginterferon in combination with ribavirin. Two of them had renal impairment at baseline.

RESULTS

With treatment, they had a significant improvement in terms of serum liver transaminase level, and two patients achieved the early virological response and the other two rapid virological response. All four patients achieved sustained virological response, with neither HCV flare up nor renal dysfunction during follow-up for a mean duration of 74.3 months after therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that sustained HCV virological response may be achieved without allograft dysfunction, in selected renal transplant patients using a peginterferon-based therapy.

The Pharmacokinetics of Beraprost Sodium Following Single Oral Administration to Subjects With Impaired Kidney Function

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of beraprost sodium (BPS) and its active enantiomer, BPS-314d, in Japanese subjects with impaired kidney function. The plasma and urine concentrations of BPS and BPS-314d were measured following the single oral administration of 120 μg of BPS as the sustained-release tablet, TRK-100STP, under fasting conditions to 18 subjects with impaired kidney function (stage 2, 3, and 4 chronic kidney disease [CKD] as categorized by the estimated glomerular filtration rate) and to 6 age-, body weight-, and gender-matched subjects with normal kidney function (stage 1 CKD). The C_max values (mean ± SD) of BPS in stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 CKD, respectively, were 84.9 ± 22.9, 119.8 ± 36.4, 190.6 ± 137.3, and 240.2 ± 110.5 pg/mL; its AUC_0-48h were 978 ± 226, 1252 ± 427, 1862 ± 964, and 1766 ± 806 pg·h/mL, respectively, and its cumulative urinary excretion rates were 0.704 ± 0.351%, 0.638 ± 0.292%, 0.485 ± 0.294%, and 0.159 ± 0.136%. The C_max values of BPS-314d were 22.4 ± 6.4, 30.8 ± 8.5, 46.7 ± 30.6, and 54.4 ± 25.2 pg/mL, its AUC_0-48h were 155 ± 56, 226 ± 67, 341 ± 176, and 329 ± 143 pg·h/mL, and its cumulative urinary excretion rates were 0.428 ± 0.242%, 0.349 ± 0.179%, 0.356 ± 0.270%, and 0.096 ± 0.099%, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 2 subjects with stage 2 CKD and 1 subject with stage 4 CKD. The C_max and AUC_0-48h of BPS and BPS-314d were higher based on the severity of impaired kidney function. No relationship was observed between the incidence of adverse events and the severity, and tolerability was confirmed. We consider that dose adjustment is not necessary, but BPS is more carefully treated in patients with impaired kidney function.

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Renal Excretion of Simeprevir in Subjects with Renal Impairment

BACKGROUND

Simeprevir is a N3/4 protease inhibitor approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. HCV prevalence is higher in patients with chronic kidney disease compared with the general population; safe and efficacious therapies in renal impairment are needed.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate simeprevir renal excretion in healthy subjects and to compare the simeprevir steady-state pharmacokinetics between subjects with severe renal impairment and healthy subjects.

METHODS

In the mass balance study, healthy adults received a single 200-mg dose of (14)C-simeprevir; radioactivity in the urine and feces was quantified until concentrations were <2% of the administered dose and seven or more stools were produced. In the pharmacokinetic study, non-HCV-infected adults with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤29 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and matched healthy subjects (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥80 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) received 150 mg simeprevir for 7 days. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed post-dose on Day 7.

RESULTS

(14)C-simeprevir recovery from the urine was low (0.009-0.138% of total dose). The minimum plasma concentration, maximum plasma concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve at 24 h were 71, 34, and 62% higher, respectively, in subjects with severe renal impairment compared with healthy subjects. The mean fraction of simeprevir unbound to protein was <0.0001 (all subjects). Most adverse events were grade I or II; one subject with renal impairment who was receiving fenofibrate presented with grade 3 rhabdomyolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Simeprevir plasma concentrations were mildly elevated in subjects with severe renal impairment. The results suggest that simeprevir may be administered without dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment.

The pharmacokinetics of peginterferon lambda-1a following single dose administration to subjects with impaired renal function

AIMS

This open label study was conducted to assess the effect of renal impairment (RI) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of peginterferon lambda-1a (Lambda).

METHODS

Subjects (age 18-75 years, BMI 18-35 kg m(-2) ) were enrolled into one of five renal function groups: normal (n = 12), mild RI (n = 8), moderate RI (n = 8), severe RI (n = 7), end-stage renal disease (ESRD, n = 8) based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. Subjects received a single dose of Lambda (180 µg) subcutaneously on day 1 followed by PK serum sample collections through day 29. Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data were collected through day 43. PK parameters were estimated and summarized by group. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated between normal and RI groups.

RESULTS

With decreasing eGFR, Lambda exposure (Cmax , AUC) increased while apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V/F) decreased. Relative to subjects with normal renal function (geometric mean AUC = 99.5 ng ml(-1) h), Lambda exposure estimates (AUC) were slightly increased in the mild RI group (geometric mean [90% CI]: 1.20 [0.82, 1.77]) and greater in the moderate (1.95 [1.35, 2.83]), severe RI (1.95 [1.30, 2.93]) and ESRD (1.88 [1.30, 2.73]) groups. Lambda was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated that RI reduces the clearance of Lambda and suggests that dose modifications may not be required in patients with mild RI but may be required in patients with moderate to severe RI or ESRD.

HIV and HCV Medications in End-Stage Renal Disease

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affect populations worldwide. With the availability of over 35 Food and Drug Administration approved medications for treatment of HIV, the morbidity and mortality associated with HIV has greatly improved. On the other hand, treatment options for HCV have been limited until very recently. While the use of protease inhibitors (such as boceprevir and telaprevir) has become standard of care for treatment of hepatitis C in the general population, data for individuals with impaired kidney function, particularly those on dialysis, are extremely limited. Use of medications in dialysis patients can be challenging given the dose adjustments that must be made for renally cleared molecules, and potentially increased impact of adverse effects such as anemia. Recommendations for dosing of marketed therapies for HIV and HCV are reviewed.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of peginterferon beta-1a in subjects with normal or impaired renal function

Peginterferon beta-1a was efficacious in a Phase 3 relapsing multiple sclerosis trial, and its safety profile was consistent with other beta interferons. This study evaluated the impact of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (neopterin elevation; a biomarker of pharmacological activity induced by interferon beta-1a) of peginterferon beta-1a following a single subcutaneous dose at 63 μg (n = 5) or 125 μg (n = 30). The results showed a fractional increase in area-under-the-concentration-time curve (AUC [30–53%]) and peak serum concentration (C_max [26–42%]) in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, versus healthy subjects; AUC and C_max were similar for healthy subjects and end-stage-renal-disease patients receiving hemodialysis. Pharmacokinetic simulation showed that the steady state concentration overlapped in the majority of healthy subjects and subjects with severe renal impairment. Neopterin baseline, peak concentration, and AUC increased as renal function decreased. Peginterferon beta-1a was well tolerated in all groups. These results do not warrant peginterferon beta-1a dose adjustment in subjects with renal impairment.

Hepatitis C virus infection in end-stage renal disease and kidney transplantation

Liver disease secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on renal replacement therapy and after kidney transplantation (KT). Hemodialytic treatment (HD) for ESRD constitutes a risk factor for bloodborne infections because of prolonged vascular access and the potential for exposure to infected patients and contaminated equipment. Evaluation of HCV-positive/ESRD and HCV-positive/KT patients is warranted to determine the stage of disease and the appropriateness of antiviral therapy, despite such treatment is challenging especially due to tolerability issues. Antiviral treatment with interferon (IFN) is contraindicated after transplantation due to the risk of rejection, and therefore, treatment is recommended before KT. Newer treatment strategies of direct-acting antiviral agents in combination are revolutionizing HCV therapy, as a result of encouraging outcomes streaming from recent studies which report increased sustained viral response, low or no resistance, and good safety profiles, including preservation of renal function. KT has been demonstrated to yield better outcomes with respect to remaining on HD although survival after KT is penalized by the presence of HCV infection with respect to HCV-negative transplant recipients. Therefore, an appropriate, comprehensive, easily applicable set of clinical practice management guidelines is necessary in both ESRD and KT patients with HCV infection and HCV-related liver disease.

A phase I, dose-escalation study of cyclical weekly oral temozolomide and weekly PEG-interferon alpha-2b in patients with refractory or advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent used in the treatment of central nervous system neoplasms and metastatic melanoma. Preclinical and clinical data suggested that combining TMZ with interferon alpha-2b (IFN-alpha-2b) may result in increased anti-tumour efficacy.

METHODS

This was a phase I, dose-escalation study to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of cyclical oral TMZ (days 1-7 and 15-21) in combination with pegylated IFN-alpha-2b (PEG-IFN-alpha-2b) in patients with advanced solid tumours.

RESULTS

We treated 19 patients (10 female and nine male), median age 58 years (range: 41-79 years). Ten patients tolerated TMZ at 100 mg/m² on days 1-7 and 15-21 plus PEG-IFN-alpha-2b at 1.5 mcg/kg/week on 28-day cycles which was the MTD of the combination. The pharmacokinetic parameters of PEG-IFN-alpha-2b were not altered by TMZ, at the MTD.

CONCLUSION

The MTD of cyclical oral TMZ was 100 mg/m² on days 1-7 and 15-21 when combined with weekly subcutaneous PEG-IFNα-2b at 1.5 mcg/kg/week on 28 days cycles. The PK of PEG-IFN-alpha-2b appeared consistent with those when it is used as monotherapy.

Hepatitis C virus infection in nephrology patients

CONTEXT

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection leads to chronic liver disease, but also to extra-hepatic manifestations.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITIONS

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Google Scholar, Pubmed (NLM), LISTA (EBSCO) and Web of Science have been searched.

RESULTS

Herein, we provide an overview of renal diseases related to HCV and their therapies, as well as the treatment options available for HCV (+)/RNA (+) dialysis patients. We will not mention, however, HCV infection-related complications in the post-kidney transplantation setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Extra-hepatic manifestations of HCV infection include mixed cryoglobulinemia, lymphoproliferative disorders, and renal disease. HCV infection has been reported in association with distinct histological patterns of glomerulonephritis in native kidneys.

Hepatitis C infection and chronic renal diseases

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and chronic renal diseases can be linked in two different ways. Some forms of renal disease are precipitated by HCV infection, while patients with end-stage renal disease are at increased risk for acquiring HCV infection. Patients with chronic HCV infection and renal disease have a poor prognosis. Most studies on treatment of HCV and renal diseases have been uncontrolled trials with small number of subjects. So, there is a lack of evidence-based recommendations and guidelines on the management of this condition. In this review, we will attempt to provide the most recent insights on HCV infection both as a extrahepatic manifestations and as a complication of end-stage renal patients.

Pharmacokinetic predictions for patients with renal impairment: focus on peptides and protein drugs

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

• Renal impairment may affect the pharmacokinetics of peptide and protein drugs. • Molecular size is a predictor. Small molecules are eliminated by the kidneys, whereas large molecules (>67 kDa) are not. • Urinary recovery of peptide and protein drugs in healthy volunteers is not predictive for pharmacokinetic changes in patients with renal impairment.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

• An apparently continuous non-linear relationship between molecular weight and pharmacokinetic alterations as observed in patients with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease is described. • Potentially relevant pharmacokinetic changes were found for drugs with a molecular weight below 50 kDa. • Analysis of observed pharmacokinetics in patients with severe renal impairment may be a useful approach, especially when urinary recovery in healthy volunteers is not predictive.

AIM

Drug dosage adjustments in renal impairment are usually based on estimated individual pharmacokinetics. The extent of pharmacokinetic changes in patients with renal impairment must be known for this estimation. If measured data are not available, an estimate based on drug elimination in urine of healthy subjects or patients with normal renal function is commonly made. This is not reliable, however, if renal drug metabolism is involved, as is presumably the case for many peptide and protein drugs. In the present study a new method to predict pharmacokinetic changes for such drugs based on molecular weight was derived.

METHODS

Articles reporting measured pharmacokinetics of peptide and protein drugs in patients with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease were identified from the scientific literature, the pharmacokinetic parameter values were extracted and a statistical data synthesis was performed. A sigmoid E(max) model was applied and fitted to the data and the prediction error was analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 98 peptide and protein drugs were identified. Relevant pharmacokinetic data in patients with renal impairment were found for 21 of these drugs. The average drug clearance was 30% and the average prolongation in half-life was 3.1-fold for low molecular weight peptides or proteins. The median root squared percentage of the prediction error was 18% (drug clearance) and 12% (half-life).

CONCLUSION

An apparently continuous non-linear relationship between molecular weight and pharmacokinetic alterations in patients with severe renal impairment was found. The derived equations could be used as a rough guide for decisions on drug dosage adjustments in such patients.

Management of hepatitis C in patients with chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease represents a global health problem. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is prevalent in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) and in renal transplant recipients with significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, HCV can cause various forms of glomerulopathy with the predominant type being cryglobulinemia associated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Liver enzymes are traditionally used as markers of liver injury; however, there is wide variation in aminotransferase levels in patients with ESRD. Therefore, diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in patients with ESRD is based on HCV antibody testing and further confirmation with polymerase chain reaction testing. Current standard therapy for CHC is composed of pegylated interferon and ribavirin. However, this combination is challenging in patients with ESRD due to its tolerability. We describe in this review relevant issues in epidemiology, diagnosis and management of CHC in ESRD, HD and renal transplant recipients.

Efficacy and safety of treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplant recipients

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of combined pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of post renal transplant patients who were positive for anti-HCV and HCV-RNA, and who have received treatment with combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin between October 2003 and December 2008. Only patients with stable graft function and absence of evidence of cirrhosis and who received the therapy for continuous 48 wk were included. Nineteen patients (13 male and 6 female) were identified and included. The patient’s complete blood count, liver and kidney profile, and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were monitored every 6-8 wk while on treatment. HCV-RNA was tested at 12 wk for early virological response, at 48 wk for end of treatment response (ETR), and then retested at 24, and 48 wk after completion of therapy for sustained virological response (SVR). Liver biopsies were obtained before treatment from all patients and graft kidney biopsies were performed as required.

RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 9 patients (47.4%) showed an ETR and 8 had SVR (42.1%). Of the 8 patients with abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at baseline, 78.9% had their ALT normalized (including the virological non responders). ALT was normal in all responders at the end of therapy and at 24 wk post therapy (100%). Only one patient (5.3%) developed an increase in creatinine and decline in GFR from baseline towards the end of treatment. This patient’s kidney biopsy revealed borderline rejection. There was no impact on response by HCV-genotype, initial HCV RNA load, age or sex of the patient or duration post transplant before commencement of therapy. All patients tolerated treatment in the same way as non-transplant with no unusual or increased occurrence of side effects.

CONCLUSION: The combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin is effective in suppressing HCV-RNA, with a low risk of graft rejection or failure in HCV infected renal transplant recipients.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: a single United Arab Emirates center experience

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is prevalent among hemodialysis patients. In patients with normal kidney function, treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin can lead to eradication of HCV (hepatitis C virus). But the treatment is more problematic in patients with impaired kidney function, in part due to the altered pharmacokinetics of these medications. Despite recent guidelines, the optimal strategy in this group of patients is not well defined.

METHOD

In a retrospective study, we reviewed all patients with chronic hepatitis C on hemodialysis treated at Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, in the United Arab Emirates between 2003 and 2009. The aim of our study was to determine the rate of sustained viral response (SVR) and to establish the safety and rate of dropouts in the different treatment regimens used (patients treated with peginterferon only and patients treated with peginterferon and low dose ribavirin).

RESULTS

22 patients were treated during this period. 5 patients received monotherapy with a reduced dose of peginterferon alfa 2b s.c. once weekly while 17 patients were treated with a combination of reduced dose of peginterferon alfa 2a or 2b s.c. once weekly and a low dose ribavirin (200mg/day). A SVR was achieved in 73% (16/22 patients) of the total patient population and in 76% (13/17 patients) in the sub-group of patients treated with a combination therapy. The tolerability was high. No patients had to discontinue their treatment. The use of ESA (erythropoietin stimulating agents) and G-CSF was common in the combination therapy (94% and 53% respectively).

CONCLUSION

In our study of patients on hemodialysis with chronic hepatitis C, the use of peginterferon or a combination of peginterferon with a low daily dose of ribavirin achieved a high rate of SVR and the rate of dropout was low after pursuing an aggressive management of side effects.

[A case of pegylated interferon alpha-2a monotherapy in a peritoneal dialysis patient with chronic hepatitis C]

Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) is now the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C. But, there are few reports about patients with end stage renal disease, and treatment protocol for HCV infection has not been determined, particularly in patients on peritoneal dialysis. We experienced a case of a peritoneal dialysis patient with chronic hepatitis C who was successfully treated with PEG-IFN monotherapy. A 50-year old man was undergoing peritoneal dialysis because of diabetic nephropathy. Considering that his HCV genotype was 2, we decided to treat him with PEG-IFN alpha-2a monotherapy 4 month after the beginning of peritoneal dialysis. We adopted a 90 mg of PEG-IFN administration. After the injection of PEG-IFN, dialysate concentration of PEG-IFN did not change significantly. HCV-RNA disappeared at the 4th week and sustatined virus response was achieved thereafter. No side effects were observed during the treatment of 24 weeks. PEG-IFN monotherapy with dose modification may be a safe and effective treatment for HCV infection in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The incidence of acute HCV infection during maintenance dialysis is much higher than that in the general population because of the risk of nosocomial transmission. Following acute HCV infection, most patients develop chronic HCV infection, and a significant proportion develop chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma. Overall, chronic hepatitis C patients on hemodialysis bear an increased risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality, either during dialysis or after renal transplantation. Interferon (IFN) therapy is modestly effective for the treatment of HCV infection in ESRD patients. Conventional or pegylated IFN monotherapy has been used to treat acute hepatitis C in ESRD patients with excellent safety and efficacy. Regarding chronic hepatitis C, approximately one-third of patients can achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) after conventional or pegylated IFN monotherapy. The combination of low-dose ribavirin and conventional or pegylated IFN has further improved the SVR rate in treatment-naïve or retreated ESRD patients in clinical trials. Similar to the treatment of patients with normal renal function, baseline and on-treatment HCV virokinetics are useful to guide optimized therapy in ESRD patients. Of particular note, IFN-based therapy is not recommended at the post-renal transplantation stage because of the low SVR rate and risk of acute graft rejection. In conclusion, ESRD patients with HCV infection should be encouraged to receive antiviral therapy, and those who achieve an SVR usually have long-term, durable, virological, biochemical, and histological responses.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of albinterferon alfa-2b in subjects with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis compared to those in matched healthy volunteers

Albinterferon alfa-2b (albIFN) is being developed, in combination with ribavirin, for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a 900-μg dose of albIFN administered as a single subcutaneous injection in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on hemodialysis and matched healthy volunteers (by age [±5 years], weight [±5 kg], and gender). The maximum concentration in plasma (C(max)) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) were 42.8 ± 14.0 ng/ml and 16,414 ± 4,203 ng·h/ml, respectively, for healthy volunteers, while the C(max) and AUC(0-∞) were 49.9 ± 20.9 ng/ml and 18,919 ± 8,008 ng·h/ml, respectively, for ESRD patients. The geometric least-squares mean ratios were 1.15 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.78, 1.68) for C(max) and 1.11 (90% CI, 0.83, 1.48) for AUC(0-∞). Adverse events were as expected for an interferon (e.g., flu-like symptoms), with the main laboratory adverse event being a decline in total white blood cell count, which was specifically related to a decline in the neutrophil count. This effect was somewhat greater in the ESRD patients, with the maximal decreases in neutrophil counts from those at the baseline being (-2.6 ± 0.32) × 10(9) and (-2.19 ± 0.58) × 10(9) cells/liter for the ESRD patients and the healthy volunteers, respectively. This study indicates no significant effect of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of albIFN. Safety and tolerability were as expected for an interferon.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in dialysis patients: an update

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a blood-borne infection and its prevalence used to be elevated in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Its main mode of contamination relies on nosocomial transmission. HCV infection is frequently associated in HD patients with normal liver enzymes whereas liver histology can display some degree of HCV-related lesions. The assessment of HCV-related lesions, even in HD dialysis patients, can be done via noninvasive tests. After kidney transplantation, HCV-related lesions can worsen; however, in this setting antiviral treatment harbors the risk of acute rejection. Therefore, it is recommended to implement antiviral treatment while the patient is receiving dialysis therapy. In this setting, the rate of viral clearance is usually high. In case of sustained virological response, no relapse occurs after kidney transplantation, despite heavy immunosuppression.

Pegylated interferon monotherapy of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients: Meta-analysis of clinical trials

The efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon monotherapy in patients with chronic renal failure and chronic hepatitis C remains unclear, although a number of small clinical trials have been published addressing this issue. A systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical trials was performed in order to assess efficacy and safety of initial pegylated interferon monotherapy in chronic renal failure patients with chronic hepatitis C. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (as a measure of efficacy); the secondary outcome was drop-out rate (as a measure of tolerability). The random effects model of Der Simonian and Laird was used, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. Sixteen clinical trials (254 unique patients) were identified, five (31%) being controlled studies; the majority (15/16 = 94%) regarded patients on long-term dialysis. The summary estimate for sustained virological response and drop-out rate was 33% [95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI) 24-43] and 23% (95%CI, 14-33), respectively. The most frequent side-effects requiring interruption of treatment were haematological (18%) and gastrointestinal (14%). In the group of controlled clinical trials, the summary estimate for sustained viral response and drop-out rate was 38% (95% CI, 18-59), and 15% (95% CI, 3-26), respectively. The studies were heterogeneous with regard to sustained virological response and drop-out rate. Pegylated IFN does not provide an added benefit in terms of virological response in comparison with standard IFN monotherapy. Tolerance to pegylated-IFN monotherapy was unsatisfactory. Prospective trials are in progress to assess the optimal antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with Peg-interferon alfa-2b

INTRODUCTION

Peginterferon has an increased plasma half-life and enables a constant exposure to interferon. This modification might increase the antiangiogenic effect of the treatment and influence the efficacy. We report the results of a phase II open-label study with Peginterferon alfa-2b (Pegintron Schering-Plough) on efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (MRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty eight patients with MRCC were treated with Peginterferon in escalating doses of 0.5 microg/kg once weekly until 2 microg/kg was reached or prohibited toxicity occurred. Lesions were evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).

RESULTS

Thirteen patients tolerated a dose of 2 microg/kg/week. At 6 months 16 patients (57%) had disease control of which four had partial response (PR) and 12 stable disease whereas 12 (43%) had progressed. PR was only seen in the lung parenchyma or mediastinum. Median time to progression (TTP) was 8 months in all patients and 13 months for PR and SD patients. Correspondingly, median survival was 19.5 months and 28 months, respectively (seven patients received second-line treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitor). The mean dose during long-term treatment was 1.5 and at the end of treatment 1.2 microg/kg/week. Most side effects were grade 1-2 and only two patients stopped treatment for that reason. VEGF levels in serum before and during treatment did not correlate to the therapeutic response.

DISCUSSION

Peginterferon was well tolerated in MRCC albeit with dose modification during long-term treatment. Response pattern seems to be the same as with nonpegylated interferon. Peginterferon may be used as monotherapy in selected patients and in trials of combinations with targeted drugs.

Health care-associated transmission of hepatitis B and C viruses in hemodialysis units

Liver disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving long-term dialysis. This article summarizes the most recent information on epidemiology, clinical significance, and management of infection by hepatitis B and C viruses in this population.

Pharmacodynamic enhancement of the anti-platelet antibody Fab abciximab by site-specific pegylation

Monoclonal antibodies have been firmly established as human therapeutics. Their high affinity and specificity for target antigens minimize adverse reactions and their molecular size results in extended circulation times relative to small molecule pharmaceuticals. The ability to customize the pharmacokinetics in a rational manner can enhance the potential for these and other classes of biologicals. We have systematically studied the effect of site-specific pegylation of the Fab' fragment of the anti-GPIIb/IIIa, alphavbeta3 antibody c7E3. Regardless of the molecular weight of the PEG molecules, the intrinsic affinity of the resulting constructs remained unchanged. However, in functional assays measuring inhibition of platelet aggregation, the calculated IC50 values of the conjugates decreased with increasing molecular weight of the conjugated PEG. It was determined that the molecular size of the conjugates affects antigen accessibility and whereas high levels of binding to antigen molecules on cells with high antigen density can be demonstrated with the Fab fragment, comparable levels are not achievable with large molecular weight conjugates. In spite of the inability of the larger PEG constructs to achieve saturation binding, functional inhibition of platelet aggregation consistent with saturation binding was demonstrated and the increased molecular size of the conjugates led to predictably prolonged inhibition of platelet aggregation.

Pegylated interferon-alpha-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C in renal transplant recipients: an open pilot study

Treatment of hepatitis C in renal transplant recipients remains a controversial issue, as interferon therapy has been associated with a high risk of rejection and poor efficacy. We report here the use of pegylated interferon-alpha, alone or in combination with ribavirin, in renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C. Eight renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C were recruited. The mean delay between renal transplantation and antiviral therapy was 198.8 months. Sustained virological response was observed in four of out eight patients. Three patients with sustained virological response were genotype 2, one was genotype 1; fibrosis stages were F1 for one patient, F2 for 2, F3 for one. At baseline, renal dysfunction was moderate in seven patients and severe in one patient. No patient experienced rejection episodes during or after pegylated interferon-alpha therapy. One patient developed haemolytic uraemic syndrome, which eventually resulted in graft loss and return to dialysis. In conclusion, for renal transplant recipients treated with pegylated interferon-alpha-based therapy, we observed a low risk of renal dysfunction, acceptable tolerance and significant virological efficacy. This is therefore the first study to suggest that pegylated interferon-alpha could be proposed late after transplantation to renal transplant recipients.

Trends in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Despite reductions in the incidence of new hepatitis C virus infections, infections from previous decades continue to place a substantial burden on our health care system. Although the course of the disease is highly variable, approximately 20% to 30% of patients develop cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Fortunately, treatment with our current standard of care, peginterferon a and ribavirin, can reduce the complications of chronic liver disease. However, these drugs are associated with significant adverse effects, many patients are ineligible for treatment, and only 50% are cured. Thus, there is a tremendous need to improve our current therapies and develop new compounds for this disease. This review highlights the transmission, pathophysiology, and course of illness; the pharmacokinetics, proposed mechanisms of action, adverse events, and potential drug interactions with peginterferon a and ribavirin; current treatment trends; the role of the pharmacist in the treatment of this disease; and investigational drugs in later stages of clinical development. Despite the initial hope that these new drugs would replace our current standard of care, it has become clear that ribavirin and peginterferon a will continue to play an important role in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus in the years to come.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is especially problematic in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are undergoing hemodialysis. Rates of HCV infection are higher among hemodialysis patients than in the general population, and several routes of transmission are thought to stem from the dialysis unit. Management of chronic hepatitis C is also more complicated in hemodialysis patients because of altered pharmacokinetics and a predisposition for drug-related toxicity, particularly ribavirin-induced anemia. Clinical trials of patients with chronic hepatitis C and healthy, functioning kidney grafts are rare because of the inherent dangers of graft rejection. As a result, most studies in patients with ESRD have focused on patients waiting for a kidney transplant. Additionally, because ribavirin is contraindicated in this patient population, many studies have examined monotherapy treatments. According to meta-analyses, conventional interferon alfa treatment yields a sustained virological response (SVR) rate of 37%, whereas studies of pegylated interferon alfa monotherapy have yielded SVR rates between 13% and 75%. Several small studies have also used the monitoring of ribavirin plasma concentrations or hemoglobin levels to facilitate the use of combination therapy. In light of the results from these clinical trials, we herein review treatment guidelines and recommend strategies to help optimize the treatment of patients with ESRD.

CONCLUSION

There remains a lack of clarity surrounding the most effective treatment options for patients with chronic hepatitis C and ESRD. Treatment can be effective with many patients attaining SVR; however, unfavorable tolerability with interferon alfa-based therapy remains a concern and thus close supportive care should be aggressively pursued to help maintain adherence.

Hepatitis C virus and kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains frequent in patients on renal replacement therapy and has an adverse impact on survival in infected patients on chronic hemodialysis as well as renal transplant (RT) recipients. Nosocomial spread of HCV within dialysis units continues to occur. HCV is also implicated in the pathogenesis of renal dysfunction often mediated by cryoglobulins leading to chronic kidney disease as well as impairing renal allograft function. The role of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in patients with renal failure remains unclear. Monotherapy with conventional interferon (IFN) for chronic hepatitis C is probably more effective in dialysis than in non-uraemic patients but tolerance is lower. Limited data only are available about monotherapy with pegylated interferon and combination therapy (pegylated IFN plus ribavirin) for chronic HCV in the dialysis population. Clinical experience with antiviral therapy for acute HCV in dialysis population is encouraging. Interferon remains contraindicated post-RT because of concerns about precipitating graft dysfunction. Sustained viral responses obtained by antiviral therapy in renal transplant candidates are durable after renal transplantation and may reduce HCV-related complications after RT (post-transplant diabetes mellitus, HCV-related glomerulonephritis, and chronic allograft nephropathy).

HCV in patients with end-stage renal disease

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains an important cause of liver disease in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and conversely, renal failure has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality throughout the natural history of chronic HCV and its treatment. With improved awareness within dialysis units of the potential for spread and the institution of preventative measures, the prevalence of HCV infection in the hemodialysis-dependent population has continued to decline since 1995. Use of HCV (+) donor kidneys is associated with an increase in the prevalence of liver disease, but when compared with continued hemodialysis, transplantation using these kidneys is associated with improved survival. Overall, survival in patients with chronic HCV infection appears to be better after renal transplantation when compared with maintenance hemodialysis, and transplant should be considered for these patients. Data support the use of interferon and the improved efficacy of pegylated interferon formulations for treatment of chronic HCV infection in ESRD patients, although tolerability continues to be troublesome. The newest and most promising data regarding the treatment of HCV in ESRD involve the combination of reduced dose ribavirin with interferon or pegylated interferon suggesting similar enhancements in sustained virologic response (SVR) as seen in non-ESRD patients, but caution is advised, as all studies to date used ribavirin plasma concentration monitoring in patient with ESRD. Finally, with regard to postrenal transplant treatment of HCV infection, there is no evidence to support treatment with interferon-based therapy and pretransplant treatment remains the best option whenever possible.

Hepatitis C virus infection in haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important global health problem. The prevalence of HCV is significantly higher in haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients, as compared to the general population. In spite of the relatively milder liver disease activity reported in HCV-infected haemodialysis patients, HCV infection adversely affects survival. Likewise, HCV has a detrimental effect on both patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation. However, patient survival is significantly better with kidney transplantation compared to remaining on dialysis; therefore, HCV infection alone should not be a contraindication to transplantation. Combination antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha and low-dose ribavirin is currently evolving in haemodialysis patients. Interferon-alpha (standard/pegylated) is relatively contraindicated after kidney transplantation because of an increased risk of allograft rejection. Therefore, antiviral treatment of transplant candidates while on dialysis remains the best option and may avoid the risk of HCV-associated liver and renal disease after transplantation. Large multi-centre clinical trials are required in HCV-infected haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients in order to define optimal therapeutic strategies before and after transplantation.

Hepatitis C virus infection and the dialysis patient

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains common in patients undergoing regular dialysis and is an important cause of liver disease in this population both during dialysis and after renal transplantation (RT). Anti-HCV screening of blood products has almost eliminated posttransfusion HCV infection but acquisition of HCV continues to occur in dialysis patients because of nosocomial spread. The natural history of HCV in dialysis population is not completely understood though recent data show that HCV infection has a detrimental role on survival of chronic dialysis patients. Several clinical trials have suggested that the response rate to conventional interferon (IFN) is higher in dialysis patients than those with normal kidney function but tolerance is lower. There are only limited data about pegylated IFN alone or in association with ribavirin for hepatitis C in dialysis population. IFN remains contraindicated post-RT because of concern about precipitating graft dysfunction; however, preliminary evidence shows the durability of sustained response to antiviral therapy pre-RT after renal transplant. Successful pretransplant therapy is associated with several benefits after RT including reduced incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus and de novo glomerulonephritis in HCV-infected recipients.

Nanomedicines in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C co-infected with HIV--focus on pegylated interferon-alpha

In immuno-competent individuals, the natural course of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly variable and 5%–30% of patients develop cirrhosis over 20 years. Co-infection with HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is an important prognostic factor and associated with more frequent and accelerated progression to cirrhosis. Until recently HIV/AIDS-related complications were life limiting in patients co-infected with HCV; the introduction of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) and the better prognosis of HIV infection has made HCV-related complications an emerging health problem in HCV/HIV co-infected individuals. Treatment of chronic HCV infection has also evolved since the introduction of interferon-alpha. Recently, introduction of pegylated interferon-alpha (peginterferon-alpha) has resulted in an increase in sustained virus clearance rates of up to 80% in selected genotypes and patient populations. The safety and efficacy of modern anti HCV treatment regimens – based on peginterferon-alpha in combination with ribavirin – was evaluated in 4 controlled trials. Sustained clearance of hepatitis C virus can be achieved in up to 35% of patients with HIV/HCV co-infection, and novel HCV treatment regimens based on peginterferon-alpha have no negative effect on the control of HIV disease. In conclusion, if HIV infection is well controlled and CD4⁺ cell counts >100/mm³, treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon in combination with ribavirin is safe and should be given for 48 weeks regardless of the HCV genotype. Introduction of peginterferon-alpha has significantly improved adherence to treatment and treatment efficacy; in particular sustained virologic response in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection improved, but sustained viral clearance in only 7%–38% of patients infected with genotype 1 and 4 cannot be the final step in development of effective treatments in patients with HCV/HIV co-infection.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of peginterferon alfa-2b in patients with renal insufficiency

AIM

To evaluate the safety, tolerability and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa-2b in patients with moderate or severe renal insufficiency and in those with normal renal function.

METHODS

In an open-label study, subjects with normal renal function (creatinine clearance >80 ml min(-1) per 1.73 m2) and patients with moderate (30-50 ml min(-1) per 1.73 m2) or severe (10-29 ml(-1) min(-1) per 1.73 m2) renal impairment received weekly injections of PEG-IFN alfa-2b (1.0 microg kg(-1)) for 4 weeks. Safety assessments were made before each injection and blood samples were taken up to 168 h after the final dose.

RESULTS

Renal insufficiency increased PEG-IFN alfa-2b exposure. Area under the curve for 0-tau (dosing interval of 168 h), AUC(tau), was increased 30% and 120% in patients with moderate or severe renal insufficiency, respectively. Mean maximum serum concentration was almost doubled in patients with severe insufficiency [1305.8 pg ml(-1); 95% confidence interval (CI) 825, 1786] compared with subjects with normal renal function (731.4 pg ml(-1); 95% CI 407, 1056), whereas the apparent volume of distribution was reduced (0.80 l kg(-1)vs. 1.28 l kg(-1), respectively). Elimination half-life was extended in patients with moderate and severe renal insufficiency (65.6 h and 64.9 h, respectively) compared with subjects with normal renal function (51.5 h). Significant differences were observed in the AUC and C(max) values of patients with severe renal dysfunction, compared with those who had normal renal function (P < 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test). PEG-IFN alfa-2b was well tolerated and adverse events were similar in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to PEG-IFN alfa-2b is increased in patients with renal insufficiency, suggesting that doses of the drug should be reduced by 50% in patients with severe renal insufficiency and by 25% in those with moderate insufficiency.

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin in haemodialysed patients awaiting renal transplant

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We undertook a pilot study to investigate the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin in haemodialysed chronic HCV patients awaiting renal transplant.

METHODS

Patients received peginterferon alfa-2a 135 microg/week plus ribavirin 200 mg/day for 24 or 48 weeks (genotype non-1 and 1, respectively). The dose of ribavirin was tailored according to plasma concentrations and to haemoglobin levels. Outcomes in treated patients were compared with those of a matched untreated control group.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients received treatment, while 35 served as untreated controls. Thirty patients completed treatment; patients were withdrawn due to transplantation (n=2), severe anaemia (n=1), dermatitis (n=1) and non-response (n=1) resulting in a drop-out rate of 14%. Overall, 34/35 treated patients were HCV RNA negative at week 4 and had undetectable RNA at the end of treatment, compared with none of the untreated controls (ETR 97% vs 0%; p<0.001). Moreover, all achieved sustained virological response after 24 weeks of treatment-free follow-up versus no control patients (SVR 97% vs 0 %; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have shown for the first time in a large cohort of patients that HCV-patients on haemodialysis can be treated successfully with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin.

Pilot study of pegylated interferon-alpha 2a in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

AIM

Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) combined with ribavirin is recommended for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients without renal failure. The optimal treatment of hepatitis C in dialysis patients remains to be established. A high incidence of adverse effects has been observed with conventional interferon and PEG-IFN alpha-2b in dialysis patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study to investigate the tolerability and efficacy of PEG-IFN alpha-2a (135 microg weekly for 48 weeks) in six dialysis patients with chronic HCV infection.

RESULTS

Two patients completed 48 weeks of treatment. Treatment was stopped in three patients (beyond 24 weeks) when they developed unrelated complications, and stopped in one patient due to failure of viral clearance. None required treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects, and PEG-IFN alpha-2a was subjectively well tolerated. Marrow suppression with mild anaemia, leucopenia, or thrombocytopenia remained common. Two patients (infected with genotypes 3a and 1b, respectively) had sustained virological response.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this pilot study showed that PEG-IFN alpha-2a appeared relatively well tolerated in dialysis patients with chronic HCV infection, and about one-third of patients could achieve sustained virological response.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection

Acute and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a serious health problem worldwide, however, there has been advancement in the treatment of HCV infection due to standard treatment using pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The literature indicates that therapy for HCV is becoming more individualized. In addition to considering genotype and viral RNA levels before treatment, achievement of an early virologic response (EVR) and a rapid virologic response (RVR) is now possible during therapy. Moreover, problem patients, such as non-responders, relapsers, HIV or HBV co-infected patients, patients with liver cirrhosis, and pre- or post-liver transplantation patients are an increasing fraction of the patients requiring treatment. This article reviews the literature regarding standard treatments and problem patients with acute and chronic HCV infection. It also includes discussion on contraindications and side effects of treatment with interferon and ribavirin, as well as new drug development.