Pharmacokinetics of famotidine in patients with cystic fibrosis

Drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Malabsorption of fat and protein contributes to poor nutritional status in people with cystic fibrosis. Impaired pancreatic function may also result in increased gastric acidity, leading in turn to heartburn, peptic ulcers and the impairment of oral pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. The administration of gastric acid-reducing agents has been used as an adjunct to pancreatic enzyme therapy to improve absorption of fat and gastro-intestinal symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis. It is important to establish the evidence regarding potential benefits of drugs that reduce gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity for: nutritional status; symptoms associated with increased gastric acidity; fat absorption; lung function; quality of life and survival; and to determine if any adverse effects are associated with their use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic and non-electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals,  abstract books and conference proceedings. Both authors double checked the reference lists of the searches Most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 26 April 2021. On the 26 April 2021 further searches were conducted on the clinicaltrials.gov register to identify any ongoing trials that may be of relevance. The WHO ICTRP database was last searched in 2020 and is not currently available for searching due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised trials involving agents that reduce gastric acidity compared to placebo or a comparator treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently selected trials, assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 40 trials; 17 of these, with 273 participants, were suitable for inclusion, but the number of trials assessing each of the different agents was small. Seven trials were limited to children and four trials enrolled only adults. Meta-analysis was not performed, 14 trials were of a cross-over design and we did not have the appropriate information to conduct comprehensive meta-analyses. All the trials were run in single centres and duration ranged from five days to six months. The included trials were generally not reported adequately enough to allow judgements on risk of bias. However, one trial found that drug therapies that reduce gastric acidity improved gastro-intestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain; seven trials reported significant improvement in measures of fat malabsorption; and two trials reported no significant improvement in nutritional status. Only one trial reported measures of respiratory function and one trial reported an adverse effect with prostaglandin E2 analogue misoprostol. No trials have been identified assessing the effectiveness of these agents in improving quality of life, the complications of increased gastric acidity, or survival.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Trials have shown limited evidence that agents that reduce gastric acidity are associated with improvement in gastro-intestinal symptoms and fat absorption. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to indicate whether there is an improvement in nutritional status, lung function, quality of life, or survival. Furthermore, due to the unclear risks of bias in the included trials, we are unable to make firm conclusions based on the evidence reported therein. We therefore recommend that large, multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trials are undertaken to evaluate these interventions.

Drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Malabsorption of fat and protein contributes to poor nutritional status in people with cystic fibrosis. Impaired pancreatic function may also result in increased gastric acidity, leading in turn to heartburn, peptic ulcers and the impairment of oral pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. The administration of gastric acid-reducing agents has been used as an adjunct to pancreatic enzyme therapy to improve absorption of fat and gastro-intestinal symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis. It is important to establish the evidence regarding potential benefits of drugs that reduce gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity for: nutritional status; symptoms associated with increased gastric acidity; fat absorption; lung function; quality of life and survival; and to determine if any adverse effects are associated with their use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings.Most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 12 May 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised trials involving agents that reduce gastric acidity compared to placebo or a comparator treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently selected trials, assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 39 trials; 17 of these, with 273 participants, were suitable for inclusion, but the number of trials assessing each of the different agents was small. Seven trials were limited to children and four trials enrolled only adults. Meta-analysis was not performed, 14 trials were of a cross-over design and we did not have the appropriate information to conduct comprehensive meta-analyses. All the trials were run in single centres and duration ranged from five days to six months. The included trials were generally not reported adequately enough to allow judgements on risk of bias.However, one trial found that drug therapies that reduce gastric acidity improved gastro-intestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain; seven trials reported significant improvement in measures of fat malabsorption; and two trials reported no significant improvement in nutritional status. Only one trial reported measures of respiratory function and one trial reported an adverse effect with prostaglandin E2 analogue misoprostol. No trials have been identified assessing the effectiveness of these agents in improving quality of life, the complications of increased gastric acidity, or survival.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Trials have shown limited evidence that agents that reduce gastric acidity are associated with improvement in gastro-intestinal symptoms and fat absorption. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to indicate whether there is an improvement in nutritional status, lung function, quality of life, or survival. Furthermore, due to the unclear risks of bias in the included trials, we are unable to make firm conclusions based on the evidence reported therein. We therefore recommend that large, multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trials are undertaken to evaluate these interventions.

Drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Malabsorption of fat and protein contributes to poor nutritional status in people with cystic fibrosis. Impaired pancreatic function may also result in increased gastric acidity, leading in turn to heartburn, peptic ulcers and the impairment of oral pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. The administration of gastric acid-reducing agents has been used as an adjunct to pancreatic enzyme therapy to improve absorption of fat and gastro-intestinal symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis. It is important to establish the evidence regarding potential benefits of drugs that reduce gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity for: nutritional status; symptoms associated with increased gastric acidity; fat absorption; lung function; quality of life and survival; and to determine if any adverse effects are associated with their use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings.Most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 17 March 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised trials involving agents that reduce gastric acidity compared to placebo or a comparator treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently selected trials, assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 39 trials; 17 of these, with 273 participants, were suitable for inclusion, but the number of trials assessing each of the different agents was small. Seven trials were limited to children and four trials enrolled only adults. Meta-analysis was not performed, 14 trials were of a cross-over design and we did not have the appropriate information to conduct comprehensive meta-analyses. The included trials were generally not reported adequately enough to allow judgements on risk of bias.However, one trial found that drug therapies that reduce gastric acidity improved gastro-intestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain; seven trials reported significant improvement in measures of fat malabsorption; and two trials reported no significant improvement in nutritional status. Only one trial reported measures of respiratory function and one trial reported an adverse effect with prostaglandin E2 analogue misoprostol. No trials have been identified assessing the effectiveness of these agents in improving quality of life, the complications of increased gastric acidity, or survival.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Trials have shown limited evidence that agents that reduce gastric acidity are associated with improvement in gastro-intestinal symptoms and fat absorption. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to indicate whether there is an improvement in nutritional status, lung function, quality of life, or survival. Furthermore, due to the unclear risks of bias in the included trials, we are unable to make firm conclusions based on the evidence reported therein. We therefore recommend that large, multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trials are undertaken to evaluate these interventions.

Drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Malabsorption of fat and protein contributes to poor nutritional status in people with cystic fibrosis. Impaired pancreatic function may also result in increased gastric acidity, leading in turn to heartburn, peptic ulcers and the impairment of oral pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. The administration of gastric acid-reducing agents has been used as an adjunct to pancreatic enzyme therapy to improve absorption of fat and gastro-intestinal symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis. It is important to establish the evidence regarding potential benefits of drugs that reduce gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity for: nutritional status; symptoms associated with increased gastric acidity; fat absorption; lung function; quality of life and survival; and to determine if any adverse effects are associated with their use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, abstract books and conference proceedings.Most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 15 February 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised trials involving agents that reduce gastric acidity compared to placebo or a comparator treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently selected trials, assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-eight trials were identified from the searches. Sixteen trials, with 256 participants, were suitable for inclusion. Seven trials were limited to children and three trials enrolled only adults. Meta-analysis was not performed. However, one trial found that drug therapies that reduce gastric acidity improved gastro-intestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain; seven trials reported significant improvement in measures of fat malabsorption; and two trials reported no significant improvement in nutritional status. Only one trial reported measures of respiratory function and one trial reported an adverse effect with prostaglandin E2 analogue misoprostol. No trials have been identified assessing the effectiveness of these agents in improving quality of life, the complications of increased gastric acidity, or survival.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Trials have shown limited evidence that agents that reduce gastric acidity are associated with improvement in gastro-intestinal symptoms and fat absorption. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to indicate whether there is an improvement in nutritional status, lung function, quality of life, or survival. We therefore recommend that large, multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trials are undertaken to evaluate these interventions.

Drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Malabsorption of fat and protein contributes to the poor nutritional status in people with cystic fibrosis. Impaired pancreatic function may also result in increased gastric acidity leading in turn to heartburn, peptic ulcers and the impairment of oral pancreatic replacement therapy. The administration of gastric reducing agents has been used as an adjunct to pancreatic enzyme therapy to improve nutritional status, fat malabsorption and gastro-intestinal symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis. It is thus important to establish the current level of evidence regarding potential benefits of drug therapies that reduce gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity: in improving nutritional status; on symptoms associated with increased gastric acidity; fat absorption; lung function; quality of life and survival; and to determine if any adverse effects are associated with their use.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books and conference proceedings. Most recent search of the Group's register: April 2002.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised trials involving agents that reduce gastric acidity compared to placebo or a comparator treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both reviewers independently selected trials and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-six trials were identified from the initial search. Eleven trials with 172 participants were suitable for inclusion. Five trials were limited to children and three trials enrolled only adults. One trial found that drug therapies which reduce gastric acidity improve gastro-intestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain. Five trials reported significant improvement in measures of fat malabsorption. Two trials reported no significant improvement in nutritional status. Only one trial reported measures of respiratory function and one trial reported an adverse effect with prostaglandin E2 analogue misoprostol. No trials have been identified which assess the effectiveness of agents that reduce gastric acidity in improving quality of life, the complications of increased gastric acidity, or survival.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Trials have shown limited evidence that the agents which reduce gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis are associated with improvement in gastro-intestinal symptoms and fat absorption. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to indicate whether there is an improvement in nutritional status, lung function, quality of life, or survival. We therefore recommend large, multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trials are undertaken to evaluate these interventions.

Famotidine disposition in children and adolescents with chronic renal insufficiency

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous famotidine (0.5 mg/kg, maximum 20 mg) were evaluated in 18 pediatric patients (ages 1-18 years) with stable, chronic renal insufficiency. Subjects were stratified by calculated creatinine clearance (Clcr) into mild (Clcr > or = 50 to < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2), moderate (Clcr > or = 25 to < 50 mL/min/1.73 m2), and severe (Clcr < or = 10 mL/min/1.73 m2) renal insufficiency groups. Significant differences between the mild, moderate, and severe groups were found for elimination rate (Kel), apparent elimination half-life (t1/2), area under the curve (AUC), and total plasma clearance (Clp) (p < 0.01). Famotidine renal clearance (Clr) was found to be significantly different between the mild and severe groups (p < 0.05). A linear relationship was observed between Clcr and Clp (p < 0.0001; R2 = 0.70). No significant differences in nonrenal clearance (Clnr) were found between groups; however, Clnr as a percentage of Clp was significantly different in the severe group (92.9% +/- 7.3% Clnr) compared to the combined mild and moderate groups (21.9% +/- 45.6% Clnr) (p < 0.05). It was concluded that the pharmacokinetics of famotidine are significantly altered in children with chronic renal insufficiency; accordingly, dosing should be based on glomerular filtration rate (i.e., Clcr).

The pharmacokinetics of oral ranitidine in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis

The pharmacokinetics of oral ranitidine were studied in 9 patients (ages 9.9 to 19.6 years) with cystic fibrosis (CF). Patients were evaluated at steady-state conditions, and the mean maximum serum concentration (Cmax) was 845.7 +/- 448.1 ng/mL. To adjust for the variable drug dosing used among study patients, both Cmax and area under the concentration curve (AUC) were standardized to dose (CmaxST and AUCST, respectively) and were 217.9 +/- 87.9 ng/mL and 1038.0 +/- 242.2 ng/mL.h. The elimination half-life (t1/2) was 2.7 +/- 1.4 hours, and the apparent steady-state volume of distribution (Vdss) was 4.6 +/- 1.7 L/kg. The plasma clearance was 1.022 +/- 0.290 L/kg/h. The Vdss in this study was greater than that previously reported in children with peptic ulcer disease. Statistically significant relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and measures of disease severity were not observed in the study population. The pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in children and adolescents with CF may differ from those in children and adolescents without CF.