Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic action of etodolac in patients after oral surgery

Selective COX-2 inhibitors after bariatric surgery: Celecoxib, etoricoxib and etodolac post-bariatric solubility/dissolution and pharmacokinetics

Anatomical/physiological gastrointestinal changes after bariatric surgery may influence the fate of orally administered drugs.Since non-selective NSAIDs are not well-tolerated post-surgery, selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors may be important for these patients. In this work we investigated celecoxib, etoricoxib and etodolac, for impaired post-bariatric solubility/dissolution and absorption. Solubility was studied in-vitro, and ex-vivoin aspirated gastric contents from patients pre- vs. post-surgery. Dissolution was studied in conditions simulating pre- vs. post-surgery stomach. Finally, the experimental solubility data were used in physiologically-based biopharmaceutics model (PBBM) (GastroPlus®) to simulate pre- vs. post-surgery celecoxib/etoricoxib/etodolac pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles.For etoricoxib and etodolac (but not celecoxib), pH-dependent solubility was demonstrated: etoricoxib solubility decreased ∼1000-fold, and etodolac solubility increased 120-fold, as pH increased from 1 to 7, which was also confirmed ex-vivo. Hampered etoricoxib dissolution and improved etodolac dissolution post-surgery was revealed. Tablet crushing, clinically recommended after surgery, failed to improve post-bariatric dissolution. PBBM simulations revealed significantly impaired etoricoxib absorption post-surgery across all conditions; for instance, 79% lower Cmax and 53% decreased AUC was simulated post-gastric bypass procedure, after single 120 mg dose. Celecoxib and etodolac maintained unaffected absorption after bariatric surgery.This mechanistically-based analysis suggests to prefer the acidic drug etodolac or the neutral celecoxib as selective COX-2 inhibitors, over the basic drug etoricoxib, after bariatric surgery.

Acute Pain Management

Acute pain management is improving steadily over the past few years, but training and professional education are still lacking in many professions. Untreated or undertreated acute pain could have detrimental effects on the patient in terms of comfort and recovery from trauma or surgery. Acute undertreated pain can decrease a patient's vascular perfusion, increase oxygen demand, suppress the immune system, and possibly risk increased incidence of venous thrombosis. Although acute postoperative pain needs to be managed aggressively, patients are most vulnerable during this period for developing adverse effects, and therefore, patient assessment and careful drug therapy evaluation are necessary processes in therapeutic planning. Acute pain management requires careful and thorough initial assessment and follow-up reassessment in addition to frequent dosage adjustments, and managing analgesic induced side effects. Analgesic selection and dosing must be based on the patient's past and recent analgesic exposure. There is no single acute pain management regimen that is suitable for all patients. Analgesics must be tailored to the individual patient.

The impact of clonidine on sedation after adenotonsillectomy: a prospective audit

AIMS

Clonidine may be used intraoperatively to decrease emergence delirium in children, but the drug's impact on postoperative sedation is poorly quantified.

METHODS

A prospective audit of children (≤15 years) undergoing (adeno) tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy over a period of 4 months was carried out. All children received sevoflurane for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The use of clonidine as an adjunct was left to the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Postoperative sedation was assessed using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) at 30 min intervals until discharge. Arousal was characterized using a zero asymptote model. The impact of clonidine dose on half-time to an awake state after anesthesia was investigated using nonlinear mixed effects models. Survival analysis was used to explore the effect of clonidine dose on discharge time.

RESULTS

The mean age of children (n = 177) was 5.4 sd 3.3 years, range 0.8-15.0 years and weight was 23.8 SD 11.4 kg, range 10.0-76.4 kg. There were 73 children given clonidine 0.29-4.80 mcg·kg(-1) after induction. The half-time to emergence was 10.8 (95% CI 8.5, 13.2) min. Emergence half-time was increased to 15 min with clonidine 0.5 mcg·kg(-1), 20 min with clonidine 1.5 mcg·kg(-1), 25 min with clonidine 2 mcg·kg(-1) and 65 min with clonidine 4 mcg·kg(-1). Clonidine doses 0.5-3 mcg·kg(-1) did not affect hospital discharge time.

CONCLUSIONS

Clonidine administered intraoperatively for (adeno) tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy prolonged emergence from anesthesia. Doses of 0.5-3 mcg·kg(-1) caused greater sedation in the postanesthesia care unit but did not impact on hospital discharge times.

Single dose oral etodolac for acute postoperative pain in adults

BACKGROUND

Etodolac is a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, with evidence of efficacy in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Its analgesic efficacy in postoperative pain has not been clearly established. There are no systematic reviews on Etodolac's use in this condition.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the analgesic efficacy of etodolac in single oral doses for moderate and severe postoperative pain.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Oxford Pain Relief Database for studies to May 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trials of single dose orally administered etodolac (any formulation) in adults with moderate to severe acute postoperative pain.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Pain relief or pain intensity data were extracted and converted into the dichotomous outcome of number of participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, from which relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat to benefit (NNT) were calculated. Numbers of participants using rescue medication over specified time periods, and time to use of rescue medication, were sought as additional measures of efficacy. Information on adverse events and withdrawals were collected.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine studies (1459 participants) compared etodolac and placebo. Studies were of adequate reporting quality, and the majority of participants had pain following dental extractions. The dose of etodolac used was 25 mg to 1200 mg, with most of the information for 100 mg and 200 mg. For at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours compared with placebo the NNT for etodolac 100 mg (498 participants) was 4.8 (3.5 to 7.8) and for etodolac 200 mg (670 participants) it was 3.3 (2.7 to 4.2). Very limited information with the extended release formulation did not suggest improved benefit for this outcome.The proportion of participants with at least 50% pain relief was 41% with 100 mg and 44% with 200 mg. Remedication was needed by about 60% with etodolac 200 mg or 400 mg over 6 to 8 hours, compared with almost 80% with placebo.Adverse events were uncommon, and not significantly different form placebo.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Etodolac 200 mg may be a useful analgesic in postoperative pain, with efficacy similar to paracetamol 1000 mg and celecoxib 200 mg. Higher doses may provide analgesia equivalent to more commonly used drugs, such as ibuprofen 400 mg, naproxen 500 mg and diclofenac 50 mg.

Investigating the pharmacodynamics of ketamine in children

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to describe ketamine pharmacodynamics (PD) in children. Adult ketamine concentrations during recovery are reported as 0.74 mg.l(-1) (sd 0.24 mg.l(-1)) with an EC(50) for anesthesia of 2 mg.l(-1) (sd 0.5 mg.l(-1)), but pediatric data are few.

METHODS

Children presenting for painful procedures in an Emergency Department were given ketamine 1-1.5 mg.kg(-1) i.v. Blood was assayed for ketamine on three to six occasions (median 3) over the subsequent 14-152 min (median 28.5). Procedures were videotaped. Level of sedation (0-5; unresponsive - spontaneously awake without stimulus) and a test of memory were recorded. PD was investigated using a variable slope E(max) model (sedation) or logistic regression (arousal time, memory) with nonlinear mixed effects models.

RESULTS

In total 60 children were enrolled. Pharmacokinetic data were collected in 54 of these children and there were 43 children available for PD study. The mean age was 8.15 years (sd 3.5 years) and weight was 34.9 kg (sd 15.8 kg). The half-time describing equilibration between the effect compartment and central compartment was 11 s (95% CI 0.07-20 s). The EC(50) for arousal was 0.52 (90% CI 0.22-1.17) mg.l(-1). The E(max) model with a baseline (E(0)) of five (spontaneously awake without stimulus) yielded a fractional E(max) 0.939 [coefficient of variability (CV) 24%], an EC(50) 0.56 (CV 136%) mg.l(-1) and a Hill coefficient 3.71. The EC(50) for recall memory was 0.44 (90% CI 0.09-1.70) mg.l(-1). The EC(50) for remembering was 0.38 (90% CI 0.12-1.75) mg.l(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

Concentrations associated with arousal in children are analogous to adults. The ability to recall and remember occurs at similar concentrations to those associated with arousal. A concentration of 1 mg.l(-1) was associated with a sedation level of three or less (arouses to consciousness with moderate tactile or loud verbal stimulus) in 95% of children while 1.5 mg.l(-1) was associated with a sedation level of two or less (rouses slowly to consciousness with sustained painful stimulus) in 95% of children. These concentrations can be attained for 3-4 min after 1 mg.kg(-1) and 1.5 mg.kg(-1) ketamine IV bolus, respectively. The mean arousal time can be anticipated at approximately 10 min (1 mg.kg(-1)) and 15 min (1.5 mg.kg(-1)).

Pharmacokinetics of etodolac in the horse following oral and intravenous administration

The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of etodolac following oral and intravenous administration to six horses. Additionally, in vitro cyclooxygenase (COX) selectivity assays were performed using equine whole blood. Using a randomized two-way crossover design, horses were administered etodolac (20 mg/kg) orally or intravenously, with a minimum 3-week washout period. Plasma samples were collected after administration for analysis using high pressure liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Following intravenous administration, etodolac had a mean plasma half-life (t(1/2)) of 2.67 h, volume of distribution (Vd) of 0.29 L/kg and clearance (Cl) of 234.87 mL/h kg. Following oral administration, the average maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)) was 32.57 mug/mL with a t(1/2) of 3.02 h. Bioavailability was approximately 77.02%. Results of in vitro COX selectivity assays showed that etodolac was only slightly selective for COX-2 with a COX-1/COX-2 selectivity ratio effective concentration (EC)50 of 4.32 and for EC80 of 4.77. This study showed that etodolac is well absorbed in the horse after oral administration, and may offer a useful alternative for anti-inflammatory treatment of various conditions in the horse.

Etodolac versus dexamethasone effect in reduction of postoperative symptoms following surgical endodontic treatment: a double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze the effect of etodolac versus dexamethasone in reducing postoperative pain in patients who had surgical endodontic treatment using a strict protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

The study consisted of 90 patients (38 males and 52 females) referred for surgical endodontic treatment. All procedures were performed using a microsurgical technique with a strict protocol. Patients were randomly premedicated with placebo or with one of both protocols: either a single dose of oral dexamethasone, 8 mg, preoperatively and 2 single doses, 4 mg, 1 and 2 days postoperatively, or a single dose of etodolac, 600 mg, and 2 single doses, 600 mg, 1 and 2 days postoperatively. Pain was recorded at 8, 24, and 48 hours, as well as 7 days postoperatively, on a 1-10 scale. The influence of different variables on postoperative sequelae was analyzed.

RESULTS

On a 1-10 scale, the mean values of pain report recorded were 3.8 +/- 2.9 (8 hours postoperatively), 2.93 +/- 2.4 (24 hours), 2.31 +/- 2.2 (48 hours), and 1.4 +/- 0.9 (7 days postoperatively). One day postoperatively, 41.8% of the patients reported no or very mild pain (score 1 or 2), whereas after 7 days, 87.9% reported no or very mild pain (score 1 or 2). Both etodolac and dexamethasone had a significant effect of reducing postoperative pain in patients who had surgical endodontic procedure compared with placebo (P < or = .001).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative pain following endodontic surgical treatment is not uncommon. Etodolac as well as dexamethasone might serve as a pain relief measure for postoperative pain in these patients.

Diclofenac and metabolite pharmacokinetics in children

BACKGROUND

Data concerning metabolism of diclofenac in children are limited to intravenous and enteric coated oral formulations. There are no data examining diclofenac or its hydroxyl metabolite pharmacokinetics after rectal administration in children.

METHODS

Infants (n = 26) undergoing tonsillectomy were given diclofenac 2 mg.kg(-1) followed by 1 mg.kg(-1) 8 h as suppository formulation for postoperative analgesia. Serum was assayed for diclofenac, 4'-hydroxydiclofenac and 5'-hydroxydiclofenac concentrations during the procedure and 1, 2 and 4 h postoperatively. The formation clearances of diclofenac to hydroxyl metabolites were estimated using nonlinear mixed effects models. A single compartment, first order absorption and first order elimination model was used to describe diclofenac pharmacokinetics. Published data from 11 children given enteric-coated diclofenac tablets were used to assess relative bioavailability.

RESULTS

Mean (sd) age and weight of the patients were 4.5 (1.5) years and 20.5 (4.1) kg. The formation clearance to 4'-hydroxydiclofenac (% CV) and to 5'-hydroxydiclofenac were 8.41 (8.1) and 3.41 (113) l.h(-1) respectively, standardized to a 70 kg person using allometric '1/4 power' models. Clearance by other routes contributed 33.0 (64) l.h(-1) 70 kg(-1). Elimination clearance of hydroxyl metabolites was fixed at 27.5 l.h(-1) 70 kg(-1). The volumes of distribution of parent diclofenac and its hydroxyl metabolite were 22.8 (19.0) and 45.3 (l.70) kg(-1). The suppository formulation had an absorption half-life of 0.613 (33.2) h with a lag time of 0.188 (24.9) h. Interoccasion variability of formation clearance to 4'-hydroxydiclofenac, diclofenac volume of distribution, absorption half-time and lag time for the suppository was 36%, 55%, 14% and 119%, respectively. The relative bioavailability of the suppository compared with an enteric-coated tablet was 1.26.

CONCLUSION

The formation clearance of the active metabolite 4'-hydroxydiclofenac contributed 19% of total clearance (44.82 l.h(-1) 70 kg(-1)). The rectum is a suitable route for administration of diclofenac in children 2-8 year of age and was associated with a higher relative bioavailabilty than enteric-coated tablets and an earlier maximum concentration (50 vs. 108 min). This pharmacokinetic profile renders diclofenac suppository a suitable formulation for short duration surgery.

Effect of etodolac, a COX-2 inhibitor, on neuropathic pain in a rat model

Etodolac, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, may alleviate nociceptive pain and inhibit the activation of osteoclasts. The aim of the present study was to determine whether etodolac can alleviate heat-evoked hyperalgesia and investigate its possible protective effects on osteoporosis induced by chronic constriction injury (CCI) in rats. A CCI to the sciatic nerve was performed, after which the rats received etodolac orally in a volume of 2 ml at 0, 1, and 10 mg/kg/day for 1 to 5 weeks following surgery (experiment 1); at 0 and 10 mg/kg/day for 1 day to 5 weeks following surgery (experiment 2); and at 0 mg/kg/day for 1 to 5 weeks, 10 mg/kg/day for 1 to 2 weeks after surgery, or 10 mg/kg/day for 1 to 3 weeks after surgery (experiment 3). Paw withdrawal latency after exposure to heat, bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) in the whole tibial bone, and the number of tartrate resistant acid phosphate (TRAP)-positive multinucleated osteoclasts were measured. Etodolac alleviated heat-evoked hyperalgesia in the CCI rats and the increase in number of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts on the CCI-side was abrogated, however, it did not inhibit the decrease of BMC and BMD on the CCI-side. Our results suggest that etodolac is useful for treatment of neuropathic pain.

Chiral bioequivalence: effect of absorption rate on racemic etodolac

BACKGROUND

For many racemic drugs, bioequivalence assessment based on isomer-nonspecific assays is appropriate because enantiomeric area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) exposure ratios are close to unity. Use of nonspecific methods in cases in which the ratio is substantially greater or less than 1, however, may obscure real therapeutic differences among formulations, especially if the enantiomers exhibit differing pharmacological potencies.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the influence of absorption rate on etodolac bioequivalence as measured by total [(R,S)-] and (S)-etodolac.

DESIGN

Single dose, 3-period, crossover, pharmacokinetic study in 24 healthy volunteers in which the administration rate of etodolac was varied.

METHODS

Participants received etodolac 400mg in solution, given as a single dose over 1 minute or as divided doses over 30 and 90 minutes. Unresolved and enantiomer concentrations of etodolac were measured by a validated HPLC assay. The enantiomer ratio was similarly measured by HPLC.

RESULTS

Bioequivalence parameters derived for both unresolved and (S)etodolac indicate that peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) was not bioequivalent. By delaying absorption, bioequivalence was lost.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, these data demonstrate that bioequivalence between 2 products of etodolac based on enantiomerically nonspecific criteria alone may not generalise to the pharmacologically relevant (S)-enantiomer. This suggests that enantiospecific assays are necessary for bioequivalence assessments.

Biochemistry of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors and molecular pathology of COX-2 in neoplasia

Several types of human tumors overexpress cyclooxygenase (COX) -2 but not COX-1, and gene knockout transfection experiments demonstrate a central role of COX-2 in experimental tumorigenesis. COX-2 produces prostaglandins that inhibit apoptosis and stimulate angiogenesis and invasiveness. Selective COX-2 inhibitors reduce prostaglandin synthesis, restore apoptosis, and inhibit cancer cell proliferation. In animal studies they limit carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis. In contrast, aspirin-like nonselective NSAIDs such as sulindac and indomethacin inhibit not only the enzymatic action of the highly inducible, proinflammatory COX-2 but the constitutively expressed, cytoprotective COX-1 as well. Consequently, nonselective NSAIDs can cause platelet dysfunction, gastrointestinal ulceration, and kidney damage. For that reason, selective inhibition of COX-2 to treat neoplastic proliferation is preferable to nonselective inhibition. Selective COX-2 inhibitors, such as meloxicam, celecoxib (SC-58635), and rofecoxib (MK-0966), are NSAIDs that have been modified chemically to preferentially inhibit COX-2 but not COX-1. For instance, meloxicam inhibits the growth of cultured colon cancer cells (HCA-7 and Moser-S) that express COX-2 but has no effect on HCT-116 tumor cells that do not express COX-2. NS-398 induces apoptosis in COX-2 expressing LNCaP prostate cancer cells and, surprisingly, in colon cancer S/KS cells that does not express COX-2. This effect may due to induction of apoptosis through uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and down-regulation of Bcl-2, as has been demonstrated for some nonselective NSAIDs, for instance, flurbiprofen. COX-2 mRNA and COX-2 protein is constitutively expressed in the kidney, brain, spinal cord, and ductus deferens, and in the uterus during implantation. In addition, COX-2 is constitutively and dominantly expressed in the pancreatic islet cells. These findings might somewhat limit the use of presently available selective COX-2 inhibitors in cancer prevention but will probably not deter their successful application for the treatment of human cancers.