Use of probiotics for treatment of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea: is it a myth?

Oral probiotic supplementation to alleviate diarrhea induced by fluoropyrimidines or irinotecan-based chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan cause diarrhea, which can be particularly severe in some cases. Probiotic supplementation is a potential option for managing chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotics in managing diarrhea induced by fluoropyrimidine or irinotecan-based chemotherapy in cancer patients.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, ScienceDirect, SciFinder, and Scopus in August 2023. Observational and prospective studies of cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, or irinotecan were included. RevMan (version 5.4.1) was used for statistical analysis. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO.

RESULTS

Of the 9400 records, 24 and 14 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Most studies provided a combination of probiotic strains to patients from the initiation to the completion of chemotherapy cycles. Probiotic supplementation significantly reduced all grade diarrhea (RR = 0.40; 95 % CI: 0.27, 0.60; P < 0.00001, I2: 0 %), nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.49; 95 % CI [0.37, 0.67]; P < 0.00001, I2: 0 %), bloating (RR = 0.27; 95 % CI [0.11, 0.69]; P = 0.006, I2: 0 %) and anorexia (RR = 0.62: 95 % CI [0.43, 0.90]; P = 0.01, I2: 39 %) compared to controls. Absolute risk reductions (ARR) ranged from 22.7 % to 28.5 %, with the number needed to treat (NNT) value of 3-5. Moreover, probiotics improved intestinal microbial balance and symptom scales of quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Probiotic supplementation is a promising option to manage chemoradiotherapy-induced diarrhea without serious side effects in cancer patients receiving fluoropyrimidines or irinotecan-based regimens. Given the clinically meaningful ARR and favorable NNT values, probiotics may have a role in clinical practice. However, larger trials are needed to standardize probiotic strain, dosage, duration, and target patient subgroups.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO database (CRD42023473324).

PEA-OXA restores cognitive impairments associated with vitamin D deficiency-dependent alterations of the gut microbiota

There is a growing evidence suggesting the association of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and cognitive impairment. In this study we evaluated the possible involvement of gut microbiota in the cognitive impairments mediated by VDD and investigated the effects of pharmacological treatment with the oxazoline derivative of the aliamide palmitoylethanolamide, 2-Pentadecyl-2-oxazoline (PEA-OXA). Mice were submitted to behavioural, biochemical and electrophysiological analysis to assess whether their vitamin D status affected cognitive performance together with gut microbiota composition. In VDD mice we found cognitive malfunctioning associated with reduced neuroplasticity, indicated by impaired long term potentiation, and neuroinflammation at the hippocampal level. Importantly, PEA-OXA counteracted the cognitive impairments and modified the biochemical and functional changes induced by VDD. Additionally, PEA-OXA treatment enhanced gut microbiota diversity, which tended to be decreased by VDD only in female mice, elevated the relative abundance of lactic and butyric acid-producing families, i.e. Aerococcaceae and Butyricicoccaceae, and reversed the VDD-induced decrease of butyrate-producing beneficial genera, such as Blautia in female mice, and Roseburia in male mice. These data provide novel insights for a better understanding of the cognitive decline induced by VDD and related gut dysbiosis and its potential therapeutic treatment.

Effect of probiotic supplementation on chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-related diarrhoea in patients with cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

To date, several systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMA) have investigated the effects of probiotics, but the certainty of the evidence for an effect on chemotherapy and radiotherapy-related diarrhoea has not been assessed. We conducted an overview of SRMA, searching MEDLINE, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science from inception up to February 2022. We summarised the findings of eligible SRMA. Subsequently, we included randomised clinical trials (RCT) from the SRMA in meta-analyses, using a quality effects model to calculate the OR and 95 % CI for each outcome. We used ‘A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews’ and the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the methodological quality of the SRMA and their RCT, respectively. We used the ‘Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation’.We included thirteen SRMA, which reported pooled effect sizes for chemotherapy and radiotherapy-related diarrhoea based on a total of eighteen RCT. Our meta-analyses demonstrated statistically significant beneficial effects from probiotics on all outcomes, except stool consistency; diarrhoea (any grade) OR 0·35 (95 % CI 0·22, 0·54), grade ≥ 2 diarrhoea 0·43 (0·25, 0·74), grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea 0·30 (0·15, 0·59), use of medication 0·49 (0·27, 0·88), soft stool 1·10 (0·44, 2·76) and watery stool 0·52 (0·29, 1·29). Probiotics use can reduce the incidence of diarrhoea in cancer patients in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but the certainty of evidence for significant outcomes was very low and low.

Influence of Probiotics in Prevention and Treatment of Patients Who Undergo Chemotherapy or/and Radiotherapy and Suffer from Mucositis, Diarrhoea, Constipation, Nausea and Vomiting

The administration of probiotics to patients treated with chemo- and/or radiotherapy is assumed to be beneficial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of probiotic intake on the severity of selected gastrointestinal side effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The searched databases included PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from which twenty-one studies were included. Most of them concerned diarrhoea, however, two of the studies examined constipation, another two nausea and vomiting, and eight of the included studies regarded mucositis. The total number of patients equalled 2621. The time of the conducted therapy, the administered species, neoplasm pathology, and adjuvant therapy varied. The outcome was assessed by gathering information about the statistical significance of the improvements. An enhancement was observed in thirteen studies, where probiotics had a significant impact on each of the included chemo- and/or radiotherapy side effects. However, the heterogeneity of the assessed data makes it impossible to state a firm conclusion.

Milk fermented by Lactobacillus casei CRL431 administered as an immune adjuvant in models of breast cancer and metastasis under chemotherapy

Chemotherapy is the most common treatment for breast cancer and its metastasis; however, it affects the patients' quality of life. Previously, it was demonstrated that milk fermented by Lactobacillus casei CRL431 (probiotic fermented milk (PFM)) exerted benefits against breast cancer metastasis by modulating the immune response in a mouse model. The aim of this work was to evaluate PFM administration on the side effects of capecitabine and on its anti-tumour/anti-metastatic effects. In vitro, 4T1 breast cancer cells were treated with capecitabine in the presence of immune cells' conditioned media from mice administered with PFM. Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay. In vivo, BALB/c mice (healthy, bearing breast cancer or with potential metastasis) were treated or not with capecitabine and administered with PFM. Blood cell counts, intestinal damages, lung histology and serum cytokines were evaluated. Results showed that capecitabine's toxicity on 4T1 cells was improved by the immune cells from mice that received PFM when the lower dose of capecitabine was evaluated. PFM reduced capecitabine side effects in all the mouse models and decreased intestinal mucositis and mortality. PFM administration to mice under chemotherapy maintained the anti-cancer/anti-metastasis effect of capecitabine with similar or decreased values for serum IL-10 and TNF-α and decreased IL-6, a cytokine related to poor prognosis in advanced cancer patients. In addition, PFM by itself reduced metastasis without side effects and improved the host's immune response. PFM has a potential to be administered as an immune adjuvant in patients under chemotherapy without affecting the treatment. KEY POINTS: • Milk fermented by L. casei CRL431 (PFM) diminished capecitabine side effects. • Capecitabine's toxicity on 4T1 cells was improved by the PFM-stimulated immune cells. • PFM maintained anti-cancer/anti-metastasis effect of capecitabine in mouse models. Graphical abstract.

Significance of human microbiome in breast cancer: Tale of an invisible and an invincible

The human microbiome is a mysterious treasure of the body playing endless important roles in the well-being of the host metabolism, digestion, and immunity. On the other hand, it actively participates in the development of a variety of pathological conditions including cancer. With the Human Microbiome Project initiative, metagenomics, and next-generation sequencing technologies in place, the last decade has witnessed immense explorations and investigations on the enigmatic association of breast cancer with the human microbiome. However, the connection between the human microbiome and breast cancer remains to be explored in greater detail. In fact, there are several emerging questions such as whether the host microbiota contributes to disease initiation, or is it a consequence of the disease is an irrevocably important question that demands a valid answer. Since the microbiome is an extremely complex community, gaps still remain on how this vital microbial organ plays a role in orchestrating breast cancer development. Nevertheless, undeniable evidence from studies has pinpointed the presence of specific microbial elements of the breast and gut to play a role in governing breast cancer. It is still unclear if an alteration in microbiome/dysbiosis leads to breast cancer or is it vice versa. Though specific microbial signatures have been detected to be associated with various breast cancer subtypes, the structure and composition of a core "healthy" microbiome is yet to be established. Probiotics seem to be a promising antidote for targeted prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Interestingly, these microbial communities can serve as potential biomarkers for prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer, thereby leading to the rise of a completely new era of personalized medicine. This review is a humble attempt to summarize the research findings on the human microbiome and its relation to breast cancer.

The significance of probiotics in preventing radiotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotics for prevention of radiotherapy-induced diarrhea (RID) in patients with cervical cancer. Previous studies failed to give a comprehensive analysis of the efficacy and safety of probiotics in this point.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science up to June 4, 2018. We also hand searched some studies included in previous reviews. Our primary outcome aims to compare the incidence of all Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grades of RID and adverse events (AEs) in both probiotics groups and placebo groups. Relative risk (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to compare the efficacy of probiotics in prevention of RID, and the pooled RRs were estimated using a fixed- or random-effect model; heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q and Higgins I² test. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. The analysis and bias for each of included studies were performed and assessed using Review Manager 5.2.

RESULTS

Nine randomized, placebo-controlled studies (N = 1508 participants) were included for assessing the efficacy of probiotics. Compared with placebo groups, participants in probiotic groups experienced much lower incidence of RID with RR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.46-0.81; P = 0.0007). In addition, significant results were also observed in CTC grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 RID, with the pooled RRs of 0.52 (95% CI 0.30-0.98; P = 0.02) and 0.32 (95% CI 0.12-0.82; P = 0.02) respectively. Eight studies, included 1410 participants (726 consuming probiotics, 657 consuming placebo, 27 lost to follow-up), were used for the analysis of safety of probiotics. Of the 8 studies, 4 studies had no AEs caused by probiotics, while another 4 studies reported varying degrees of AEs during their treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Probiotics may have a beneficial effect in prevention of RID generally, especially for Grade ≥2 or 3 diarrhea. Probiotics may be safe and rarely cause severe AEs during treatment.

Emerging Roles of Probiotics in Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Their Therapeutic Potential

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. Need for novel preventive and curative approaches with more safety than the present one seems inevitable. This review is devoted to potentially favorable role of probiotics in prevention and treatment of breast cancer as well as their alleviating role regarding chemotherapy-induced side effects. Literature was searched for human, animal, and in vitro studies about the role of probiotics in breast cancer. In vitro studies showed that probiotic intervention induces cancer cells apoptosis and inhibits their proliferation. In animal models, treatment with probiotics inhibited tumor growth and reduced tumor size; also, the immunomodulatory, antiangiogenesis and antimetastatic activities of probiotics were illustrated. Human studies showed that intake of Lactobacillus casei shirota reduced the breast cancer incidence and consumption of fermented milk products and yogurt was inversely associated with breast cancer incidence; however, no study regarding the curative role of probiotics in breast cancer is available. Studies on the effect of probiotics on chemotherapy-induced side effects in breast cancer were contradictory but showed potential for more investigation. Probiotics seem to have a potential role in both prevention and treatment of breast cancer. However, more clinical studies are needed to elucidate their efficacy and safety.

The efficacy and safety of probiotics for prevention of chemoradiotherapy-induced diarrhea in people with abdominal and pelvic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis were designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotics for prevention of chemoradiotherapy-induced diarrhea in people with abdominal and pelvic cancer. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science up to November 2015. We also hand searched the citation lists of included studies and previously identified systematic reviews to identify further relevant trials. Odds ratio (OR) was used to compare efficacy, and the pooled OR was estimated using a random effects model; heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q and the Higgins' I²-test. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. Analysis and bias for each included study were performed using Review Manager 5.2. Nine randomized and placebo-controlled studies (N=1265 participants) were included for assessing efficacy, of which seven were about radiotherapy and two about chemotherapy. Probiotic groups were compared with control groups with respect to the the incidence of diarrhea, OR=0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.28-0.76; P=0.002). Eleven studies, including 1612 people (873 consuming probiotics and 739 not consuming probiotics), were used for the analysis of safety of probiotics. Of the 11 studies, seven studies had no adverse events (AEs) caused by probiotics, whereas four studies reported varying degrees of AEs in their treatment. Probiotics may have a beneficial effect in prevention of chemoradiotherapy-induced diarrhea generally, especially for Grade⩾2 diarrhea. Probiotics may rarely cause AEs.

The efficacy and safety of probiotics in people with cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Probiotics are living microorganisms that are generally thought of as being beneficial to the recipient. They have been shown to be effective in people with acute infectious diarrhoea, and cost-effective in antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. Probiotics may have a role in people with cancer, as various cancer treatments often lead to diarrhoea. However, as people with cancer are often immunocompromised, it is important to assess for adverse events (AEs) such as infection, which could potentially be a consequence of deliberate ingestion of living microorganisms.

DESIGN

A systematic review was carried out to collect, analyse and synthesise all available data on the efficacy and safety of probiotics in people with cancer (PROSPERO registration: CRD42012003454). Randomised, controlled trials, identified through screening multiple databases and grey literature, were included for analysing efficacy, while all studies were included for the analysis of safety of probiotics. Primary outcomes were the reduction in duration, severity and incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and chemotherapy-associated diarrhoea, and AEs, especially probiotic-associated infection. Where possible, data were combined for meta-analysis by a random-effects model, assessing causes of heterogeneity, including differences in strains, dosage and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (N = 1557 participants) were included for assessing efficacy. Results show that probiotics may reduce the severity and frequency of diarrhoea in patients with cancer and may reduce the requirement for anti-diarrhoeal medication, but more studies are needed to assess the true effect. For example comparing probiotic use to control 25 groups on effect on Common Toxicity Criteria ≥2 grade diarrhoea, odds ratio (OR) = 0.32 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.13-0.79; P = 0.01]. Seventeen studies (N = 1530) were included in the safety analysis. Five case reports showed probiotic-related bacteraemia/fungaemia/positive blood cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Probiotics may be a rare cause of sepsis. Further evidence needs to be collated to determine whether probiotics provide a significant overall benefit for people with cancer.

Dietary and pharmacological management of severe catabolic conditions

INTRODUCTION

Nutritional debilitation is among the most devastating and life-threatening complications of cancers and various chronic diseases. It arises from a complex interaction between the illness and the host. This process includes cytokine production, release of lipid-mobilizing and proteolysis-inducing agents and alterations in intermediary metabolism. As a result, many patients develop cachexia with progressive body fat and muscle tissue wasting with associated worsening of their clinical status and a lower quality of life. This review will provide up-to-date information about different pharmacological management of cachexia.

FINDINGS

Until recently, the 2 major options for pharmacological therapy have been either progestational agents or corticosteroids. However, knowledge of the mechanisms of cachexia has led to newer therapeutic interventions for treating several aspects of the syndrome. These include antiserotonergic agents, branched-chain amino acids, eicosapentanoic acid, melanocortin antagonists and antimyostatin agents-all of which act on the feeding-regulatory circuitry to increase appetite and inhibit illness-derived catabolic elements.

CONCLUSIONS

Information from this review will guide health care providers in limiting weight loss and improve performance status of the cachectic patients through dietary and pharmacological therapy, with the hope that such approach would extend patients survival and improve their quality of life.