Gastric coagulation and postprandial amino acid absorption of milk is affected by mineral composition: a randomized crossover trial

Background: In vitro studies suggest that casein coagulation of milk is influenced by its mineral composition, and may therefore affect the dynamics of protein digestion, gastric emptying and appearance of amino acids (AA) in the blood, but this remains to be confirmed in vivo. Objective: This study aimed to compare gastrointestinal digestion between two milks with the same total calcium content but different casein mineralization (CM). Design: Fifteen males (age 30.9 ± 13.8 years, BMI 22.5 ± 2.2 kg m-2) participated in this randomized cross-over study with two treatments. Participants underwent gastric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at the baseline and every 10 min up to 90 min after consumption of 600 ml milk with low or high CM. Blood samples were taken at the baseline and up to 5 hours postprandially. Primary outcomes were postprandial plasma AA concentrations and gastric emptying rate. Secondary outcomes were postprandial glucose and insulin levels, gastric coagulation as estimated by image texture metrics, and appetite ratings. Results: Gastric content volume over time was similar for both treatments. However, gastric content image analysis suggested that the liquid fraction emptied quicker in the high CM milk, while the coagulum emptied slower. Relative to high CM, low CM showed earlier appearance of AAs that are more dominant in casein, such as proline (MD 4.18 μmol L-1, 95% CI [2.38-5.98], p < 0.001), while there was no difference in appearance of AAs that are more dominant in whey protein, such as leucine. The image texture metrics homogeneity and busyness differed significantly between treatments (MD 0.007, 95% CI [0.001, 0.012], p = 0.022; MD 0.005, 95% CI [0.001, 0.010], p = 0.012) likely because of a reduced coagulation in the low CM milk. Conclusions: Mineral composition of milk can influence postprandial serum AA kinetics, likely due to differences in coagulation dynamics. The clinical trial registry number is NL8959 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).

Quantification of gastric emptying with magnetic resonance imaging in healthy volunteers: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols have been used to assess gastric emptying (GE) with MRI. This systematic review summarizes the current literature on the topic. The aim was to provide an overview of the available imaging protocols and underline the items that appear most agreed upon and those that deserve further investigation.

METHODS

According to PRISMA guidelines, two independent reviewers conducted a systematic literature search with a pre-specified strategy in different databases. Peer-reviewed articles that utilized MRI techniques to assess GE in healthy volunteers (HVs) were included. The quality and the outcomes of the studies were reported and analyzed.

KEY RESULTS

The literature search yielded 30 studies (531 HVs, weighted mean age 27.4, weighted mean body mass index 23.0 kg/m² ), T2-weighted sequences, balanced turbo field echo, and balanced gradient echo were evenly utilized, with volunteers in the supine position (74% of the studies). After overnight fasting, both liquid (56%) and mixed (44%) meals were equally utilized. Segmentation of the volumes was predominantly performed manually (63%) with a reported mean T50 ranging from 7 to 330 min.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

As observed in this systematic review, MRI is a flexible tool for assessing GE. Different protocols were analyzed, showing an equal capacity to assess the GE. However, many items in these protocols still require further investigation to obtain a common standard and increase this assessment quality.

Efficacy and tolerability of a whey-based, medium-chain triglyceride-enhanced ketogenic formula in children with refractory epilepsy: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT) has demonstrated effectiveness in seizure reduction. However, patient compliance and adverse effects limit its use. Ready-to-feed (RTF) ketogenic formulas improve compliance and include components that mitigate adverse effects. This study is the first to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of an RTF, whey-based, medium-chain triglyceride-enhanced (WBME) ketogenic formula.

METHODS

Retrospective data from patients who received KMT between January 1, 2015, and February 28, 2018, were analyzed. Patients who received ≥75% of their total calories from the WBME formula and who were monitored for 3 months were included. Outcome measures were gastrointestinal issues, acidosis, serum blood glucose and beta-hydroxybutyrate levels, unintentional weight changes, diet response (≥50% reduction in seizures), seizure freedom, and change in formula or discontinuation of therapy. Patients with incomplete outcome data or who received <75% of total calories from the formula were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (13 males; mean [SD] age, 6.1 [5.8] years) met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen patients were established patients who received a standard ketogenic formula before changing to the WBME formula; 13 were patients new to KMT whose therapy was initiated using the WBME formula. This formula was well tolerated; no patient in either group discontinued therapy or required a change in formula. The combined diet response rate (95% CI) for established and new patients was 96% (80-100%). Seizure-freedom (95% CI) for both groups at 3 months posttreatment was 20% (7-41%). The most prevalent adverse effect was constipation (69% [95% CI, 48-86%]).

CONCLUSION

The WBME ketogenic formula appears to be effective and well tolerated by pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy.

Effects of Standard vs Energy-Dense Formulae on Gastric Retention, Energy Delivery, and Glycemia in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Energy-dense formulae are often provided to critically ill patients with enteral feed intolerance with the aim of increasing energy delivery, yet the effect on gastric emptying is unknown. The rate of gastric emptying of a standard compared with an energy-dense formula was quantified in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Mechanically ventilated adults were randomized to receive radiolabeled intragastric infusions of 200 mL standard (1 kcal/mL) or 100 mL energy-dense (2 kcal/mL) enteral formulae on consecutive days in this noninferiority, blinded, crossover trial. The primary outcome was scintigraphic measurement of gastric retention (percentage at 120 minutes). Other measures included area under the curve (AUC) for gastric retention and intestinal energy delivery (calculated from gastric retention of formulae over time), blood glucose (peak and AUC), and intestinal glucose absorption (using 3-O-methyl-D-gluco-pyranose [3-OMG] concentrations). Comparisons were undertaken using paired mixed-effects models. Data presented are mean ± SE.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were studied (male/female, 14:4; age, 55.2 ± 5.3 years). Gastric retention at 120 minutes was greater with the energy-dense formula (standard, 17.0 ± 5.9 vs energy-dense, 32.5 ± 7.1; difference, 12.7% [90% confidence interval, 0.8%-30.1%]). Energy delivery (AUC₁₂₀ , 13,038 ± 1119 vs 9763 ± 1346 kcal/120 minutes; P = 0.057), glucose control (peak glucose, 10.1 ± 0.3 vs 9.7 ± 0.3 mmol/L, P = 0.362; and glucose AUC₁₂₀ 8.7 ± 0.3 vs 8.5 ± 0.3 mmol/L.120 minutes, P = 0.661), and absorption (3-OMG AUC₁₂₀ , 38.5 ± 4.0 vs 35.7 ± 4.0 mmol/L.120 minutes; P = .508) were not improved with the energy-dense formula.

CONCLUSION

In critical illness, administration of an energy-dense formula does not reduce gastric retention, increase energy delivery to the small intestine, or improve glucose absorption or glucose control; instead, there is a signal for delayed gastric emptying.

Effect of protein composition of enteral formula on gastric content volume during continuous feeding: A randomized controlled cross-over study in healthy adults

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Enteral nutrition with polymeric intact protein formula is the preferred medical nutrition strategy in critically ill patients when oral intake is insufficient. Enteral nutrition formulas are often rich in casein protein, which has coagulating properties. Coagulation in the stomach impedes gastric emptying and might result in high gastric residual volumes which are a clinical sign of gastrointestinal intolerance and a major reason to decrease or to discontinue enteral feeding. In this study the impact of protein composition of enteral formula on gastric content volume (GCV) during and after continuous feeding was tested in healthy volunteers in whom gastrointestinal conditions of critically ill patients were mimicked.

METHODS

An enteral formula including 4 proteins (P4) with non-coagulating properties was compared to a casein-dominant formula (Cas) with coagulating properties. Esomeprazole and codeine were administered to mimic stress ulcer prophylaxis and induce gastroduodenal motor dysfunction, both being hallmarks of critically ill patients. GCV was measured with magnetic resonance imaging during and after continuous enteral feeding (100 mL/h for 4h) in a randomized single-center cross-over study. Results are provided as mean (SD). Significance level of p < 0.05 was applied.

RESULTS

Twenty subjects completed the study (14 women, 6 men, 25.8 (4.6) years old, BMI: 22.5 (1.5) kg/m²). The GCV as change from baseline at T = 240 (primary endpoint) did not differ between study products (P4: 124.3 (83.4) vs. Cas: 137.1 (102.0) mL, 95% CI: -57.4, 27.0, p = 0.457). During feeding and after cessation of feeding, the area under the GCV-curve (AUC_0-360 GCV) for P4 and Cas was 44631.1 (15546.1) and 52822.2 (19686.1) mL∗min, respectively (p = 0.061). During feeding the GCV was lower at T = 180 min (175.4 (64.8) vs. 205.2 (75.4) mL, p = 0.038) and after cessation of feeding at T = 300 min (81.3 (71.1) vs. 116.3 (84.3) mL, p = 0.004) and T = 330 min (39.9 (53.9) vs. 73.6 (81.1) mL, p = 0.031). With P4 it took less time to reach half of the GCV at T = 240 min compared to Cas (52.8 (27.6) vs. 65.4 (29.9) min, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study in which healthy volunteers received esomeprazole and codeine to mimic gastrointestinal conditions of critically ill patients, observations of secondary endpoints suggest faster gastric emptying with P4 compared to Cas, and less gastric accumulation, possibly due to the non-coagulating properties of the P4 protein blend. Considering the small effect and the possible clinical relevance of reduced intragastric accumulation of enteral nutrition, the potential impact of protein coagulation should be further investigated in relevant study populations. Registered under Netherlands Trial Register identifier no. NTR6423.

Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders

Background: Sheep milk (SM) is a possible alternate dairy source for those who experience digestive symptoms with cow milk (CM). While both the milks contain lactose, one of the causes for self-reported intolerance to CM, the composition of SM and CM also differs across proteins and fats, which have been shown to impact digestive processes. Objective: To compare the acute digestive comfort and lactose malabsorption of SM to CM in female dairy avoiders. Method: In a double-blinded, randomized cross over trial, 30 dairy-avoiding females (aged 20-30 years) drank 650 mL of SM or CM (each reconstituted from spray dried powder) following an overnight fast, on two separate occasions at least 1 week apart. Blood samples were collected for glucose and insulin assessment, and single nucleotide polymorphisms of the lactase (LCT) gene (C/T₁₃₉₁₀ and G/A₂₂₀₁₈). Breath H₂ and visual analog scale (VAS) digestive symptom scores were recorded at fasting and regular intervals over 4 h after ingestion. Results: Eighty percentage of study participants were lactase non-persistent (LNP; CC₁₃₉₁₀ and GG₂₂₀₁₈ genotype). Digestive symptoms, including abdominal cramps, distension, rumbling, bloating, belching, diarrhea, flatulence, vomiting, and nausea, were similar in response to SM and CM ingestion (milk × time, P > 0.05). Breath H₂ was greater after CM than SM (72 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 6 ppm at 240 min, P < 0.001), which may be due to greater lactose content in CM (33 vs. 25 g). Accordingly, when corrected for the lactose content breath H₂ did not differ between the two milks. The response remained similar when analyzed in the LNP subset alone (n = 20). Conclusions: Despite a higher energy and nutrient content, SM did not increase adverse digestive symptoms after ingestion, relative to CM, although there was a reduced breath H₂ response, which could be attributed to the lower lactose content in SM. The tolerability of SM should be explored in populations without lactose intolerance for whom underlying trigger for intolerance is unknown.

Achieving Protein Targets in the ICU Using a Specialized High-Protein Enteral Formula: A Quality Improvement Project

BACKGROUND

To meet protein needs in critical illness (CI), guidelines suggest ≥1.2-2.5 g protein/kg/d; however, most intensive care unit (ICU) patients receive ≤0.7 g/kg/d. Higher protein enteral nutrition (EN) formulas may be part of the solution to provide prescribed protein. Our objective was to demonstrate that an EN formula with 37% protein can deliver ≥80% of prescribed protein, without overfeeding calories within the first 5 days of feeding and to describe ICU clinicians' experience.

METHODS

This quality improvement (QI) project included patients requiring exclusive EN for up to 5 days from 6 Canadian ICUs. Rationale for choosing formula, patient's BMI (kg/m² ), nutrition targets, daily protein and energy delivered, feeding interruptions, and general tolerance were recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-four of 49 patients received the formula ≥2 days. Average protein prescribed was 137.5 g/d (82.5-200) or 1.9 g/kg/d (1.5-2.5). Average protein delivered was 116.9 g/d (33.5-180) or 1.6 g/kg/d (0.4-2.4). Seventy-five percent to 83% of patients received ≥80% prescribed protein on days 2-5. Average energy prescribed was 1638.6 kcal/d (990-2500) or 17.8 kcal/kg (11-26). Average energy delivered was 1523.9 kcal/d (693.0-2557.5) or 17.3 kcal/kg/d (1.35-64.7). The formula was well tolerated with no gastrointestinal symptoms reported in 38 (86%) patients. The most common reasons to prescribe the formula were obesity and use of fat-based medications.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated in a QI study that a high-protein EN formula was tolerated in a small, heterogeneous group of ICU patients and effective in meeting protein targets without overfeeding.

Very high intact-protein formula successfully provides protein intake according to nutritional recommendations in overweight critically ill patients: a double-blind randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Optimal energy and protein provision through enteral nutrition is essential for critically ill patients. However, in clinical practice, the intake achieved is often far below the recommended targets. Because no polymeric formula with sufficient protein content is available, adequate protein intake can be achieved only by supplemental amino acids or semi-elemental formula administration. In the present study, we investigated whether protein intake can be increased with a new, very high intact-protein formula (VHPF) for enteral feeding.

METHODS

In this randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial, 44 overweight (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2) intensive care unit patients received either a VHPF (8 g/100 kcal) or a commercially available standard high protein formula (SHPF) (5 g/100 kcal). Protein and energy intake, gastrointestinal tolerance (gastric residual volume, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation), adverse events, and serious adverse events were recorded. Total serum amino acid levels were measured at baseline and day 5.

RESULTS

The primary outcome, protein intake at day 5, was 1.49 g/kg body weight (95% CI 1.21-1.78) and 0.76 g/kg body weight (95% CI 0.49-1.03, P < 0.001) for VHPF and SHPF, respectively. Daily protein intake was statistically significantly higher in the VHPF group compared with the SHPF group from day 2 to day 10. Protein intake in the VHPF group as a percentage of target (1.5 g/kg ideal body weight) was 74.7% (IQR 53.2-87.6%) and 111.6% (IQR 51.7-130.7%) during days 1-3 and days 4-10, respectively. Serum amino acid concentrations were higher at day 5 in the VHPF group than in the SHPF group (P = 0.031). No differences were found in energy intake, measures of gastrointestinal tolerance, and safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteral feeding with VHPF (8 g/100 kcal) resulted in higher protein intake and plasma amino acid concentrations than an isocaloric SHPF (5 g/100 kcal), without an increase in energy intake. This VHPF facilitates feeding according to nutritional guidelines and is suitable as a first-line nutritional treatment for critically ill overweight patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register, NTR5643 . Registered on 2 February 2016.

On the validity of the (13) C-acetate breath test for comparing gastric emptying of different liquid test meals: a validation study using magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

(13) C-acetate breath testing (BT) is applied to assess and compare gastric emptying of liquid meals. Gastric half-emptying times (t50 ) from BT show offsets compared to t50 values from γ-scintigraphy and ultrasonography. Linear transformations have been proposed to correct these offsets. This investigation critically validates the BT for the assessment of liquid gastric emptying by using simultaneously recorded meal and total gastric content volume emptying data from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Data were collected during a recently published double-blind, randomized, cross-over MRI gastric emptying study of three (13) C-labeled enteral formulas differing in protein sources (PMID: 24699556). Breath testing-derived t50 was computed with the analysis methods commonly applied in gastric emptying research, i.e., the exponential-beta function and the Wagner-Nelson (WN) method, respectively.

KEY RESULTS

Breath testing t50 values from exponential-beta function and WN method showed a positive and negative offset to MRI data, respectively. Linear regression detected low concordance between MRI and both BT methods revealing meal specific and emptying rate-dependent offsets. The WN method showed worse agreement and correlation with MRI emptying data. Breath testing rather reflected meal volume than total gastric content volume emptying.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

This validation study indicates that the (13) C-acetate breath test may not be applied to compare gastric emptying of arbitrary liquid meals without prior validation by imaging methods. t50 values from BT are biased by (i) the properties of the meal and (ii) the selected method used for (13) CO2 exhalation analysis. No linear transformation common for all meals was applicable to correct the offsets between BT and MRI.