Piezoelectric ear surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The piezoelectric instrument (PEI) offers a novel technique for bone removal in ear surgery with a combination of micro-oscillation and cavitation. The aim of this review is to explore the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of this instrument in comparison to the drill.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations. The primary selection included all studies reporting on the use of PEI in ear surgery or its effect on the inner ear. Only studies with a control group were included in the secondary selection.

RESULTS

The first search identified 49 studies between 2003 and 2022. These reported on a total of 1162 ear operations, during which PEI was used for various indications. Most data were based on uncontrolled retrospective studies or case reports (76%). Only one of the five controlled clinical studies was prospective and randomized. The advantages of PEI weighed against its limitations and disadvantages were critically analyzed in comparison to the drill.

CONCLUSION

Piezoelectric surgery is an innovative and promising surgical technique in the temporal bone. PEI appears to enable safer and more precise bone removal in close proximity to soft tissue when compared to the drill. The slower bone removal and cost factors represent current limitations to its wider use in ear surgery.

Thermal Analysis of an Ultrasonic Aspirator Micro Claw Tool Compared With Standard High-Speed Drilling During Internal Auditory Canal Opening in a Cadaveric Model

BACKGROUND

The ultrasonic aspirator micro claw tool (UAmCT) can be used to remove the bone of the internal auditory canal (IAC) during vestibular schwannoma resection via the retrosigmoid approach (RSA) without the risk of a spinning drill shaft. However, the thermal profile of the UAmCT during IAC removal has not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the thermal profile of the UAmCT during access of the IAC to that of a conventional high-speed drill (HSD) and to present an illustrative case of this application.

METHODS

IAC opening via RSA was performed in 5 embalmed cadaveric specimens using the UAmCT with 3, 8, and 15 mL/min irrigation on the left and the HSD at 75 000 revolutions per minute and 0%, 14%, and 22% irrigation on the right. Peak bone surface temperatures were measured 4 times in 20-second intervals, and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. An illustrative case of a vestibular schwannoma resected via an RSA using the UAmCT to access the IAC is presented.

RESULTS

The IAC was opened in all 5 specimens using both the UAmCT and HSD without complication. The mean peak bone surface temperatures were significantly lower with the UAmCT compared with the HSD ( P < .001). The UAmCT did not meaningfully prolong the operating time in the illustrative case, and the IAC was accessed without complication.

CONCLUSION

The UAmCT may be a safe and effective alternative to HSD for IAC opening during vestibular schwannoma resection via the RSA. Larger studies under clinical conditions are required to further validate these findings.

[Piezoelectric ear surgery: a systematic review. German version]

BACKGROUND

The piezoelectric instrument (PEI) offers a novel technique for bone removal in ear surgery with a combination of micro-oscillation and cavitation. The aim of this review is to explore the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of this instrument in comparison to the drill.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations. The primary selection included all studies reporting on the use of PEI in ear surgery or its effect on the inner ear. Only studies with a control group were included in the secondary selection.

RESULTS

The first search identified 49 studies between 2003 and 2022. These reported on a total of 1162 ear operations, during which PEI was used for various indications. Most data were based on uncontrolled retrospective studies or case reports (76%). Only one of the five controlled clinical studies was prospective and randomized. The advantages of PEI weighed against its limitations and disadvantages were critically analyzed in comparison to the drill.

CONCLUSION

Piezoelectric surgery is an innovative and promising surgical technique in the temporal bone. PEI appears to enable safer and more precise bone removal in close proximity to soft tissue when compared to the drill. The slower bone removal and cost factors represent current limitations to its wider use in ear surgery.

Strategies for Optic Pathways Decompression for Extra-Axial Tumors or Intracranial Aneurysms: A Technical Note

BACKGROUND

 Different types of skull base tumors and intracranial aneurysms may lead to compression of the optic pathways. Since most of them are biologically benign conditions, the first aim of surgery is preservation of optic nerves rather than the oncologic radicality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Based on the progressive technical refinements coming from our institutional experience of optic nerve compression from aneurysms and extra-axial tumors, we analyzed the surgical steps to release nerves and chiasm during tumor debulking and aneurysm clipping.

RESULTS

 We distinguished vascular and tumor lesions according to the main direction of optic nerve compression: lateral to medial, medial to lateral, inferior to superior, and anterior to posterior. We also identified four fundamental sequential maneuvers to release the optic nerve, which are (1) falciform ligament (FL) section, (2) optic canal unroofing, (3) anterior clinoid process drilling, and (4) optic strut removal. The FL section is always recommended when a gentle manipulation of the optic nerve is required. Optic canal unroofing is suggested in case of lateral-to-medial compression (i.e., clinoid meningiomas), medial-to-lateral compression (i.e., tuberculum sellae meningiomas), and inferior-to-superior compression (i.e., suprasellar lesions). Anterior clinoidectomy and optic strut removal may be necessary in case of lateral-to-medial compression from paraclinoid aneurysms or meningiomas.

CONCLUSIONS

 Preservation of the visual function is the main goal of surgery for tumors and aneurysms causing optic nerve compression. This mandatory principle guides the approach, the timing, and the technical strategy to release the optic nerve, and is principally based on the direction of the compression vector.

Piezoelectric technology in otolaryngology, and head and neck surgery: a review

BACKGROUND

Piezoelectric technology has existed for many years as a surgical tool for precise removal of soft tissue and bone. The existing literature regarding its use specifically for otolaryngology, and head and neck surgery was reviewed.

METHODS

The databases Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase and Cambridge Scientific Abstracts were searched. Studies were selected and reviewed based on relevance.

RESULTS

Sixty studies were identified and examined for evidence of benefits and disadvantages of piezoelectric surgery and its application in otolaryngology. The technique was compared with traditional surgical methods, in terms of intra-operative bleeding, histology, learning curve, operative time and post-operative pain.

CONCLUSION

Piezoelectric technology has been successfully employed, particularly in otology and skull base surgery, where its specific advantages versus traditional drills include a lack of 'blunting' and tissue selectivity. Technical advantages include ease of use, a short learning curve and improved visibility. Its higher cost warrants consideration given that clinically significant improvements in operative time and morbidity have not yet been proven. Further studies may define the evolving role of piezoelectric surgery in otolaryngology, and head and neck surgery.