Outcomes of perichondrium graft covering the epithelium of the tympanic membrane for large-sized perforations: A 3-5-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the graft outcomes and iatrogenic cholesteatomas for 3 years following cartilage-perichondrium over-underlay technique with perichondrial graft covering the epithelium for large-sized tympanic membrane (TM) perforations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective case series enrolled patients with large-sized perforation who underwent endoscopic cartilage-perichondrium over-underlay technique. The graft success rate, hearing outcomes, and development of iatrogenic middle ear cholesteatomas and graft cholesteatomas were assessed at 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

This study included 62 ears of 62 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 47.3 ± 10.8 (38-64) months. Neovascularization was observed in the lateral perichondrium graft in 55 (88.7 %) patients, which inosculated into the TM remnant at 4-5 weeks. However, graft neovascularization was not observed in the four patients with excessive perichondrium graft that migrated into the external auditory canal and the three patients with middle ear infections. The graft failure rate was 6.5 % at 6 months, 11.3 % at 12 months, 6.5 % at 24 months, and the overall graft success rate was 91.8 % at the last follow-up. Granular myringitis developed in 11.3 % (7/62) of the patients. High-resolution computed tomography revealed well-pneumatized mastoids and middle ear at the final follow-up. However, graft cholesteatomas were observed in 3 (4.8 %) patients at 7-24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The cartilage-perichondrium over-underlay technique with perichondrial graft covering TM epithelium is safe and effective for the repair of large perforations, with good short- and long-term graft outcomes, minimal risk of graft cholesteatoma development, and no risk of iatrogenic middle ear cholesteatomas.

Endoscopic inlay cartilage and perichondrium myringoplasty for repairing large perforations in teenagers

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the long-term graft success rates and hearing outcomes of overlay-underlay and underly cartilage myringoplasty for repairing large perforations in Teenagers.

STUDY DESIGN

prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Pediatric patients older than 12 years with chronic perforations were randomly divided into two groups:intervention group (n = 39) and control group (n = 41). The graft success rate, hearing improvement, and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were included in this study. The graft success rate was 100% in the intervention group and 95.1% in the control group at postoperative 3 months, the difference wasn't significant (P = 0.496). Also, the graft success rate was not significantly different between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively (100.0% vs 87.8%, p = 0.073). However, the difference of graft success rate was significant between the two groups at 24 months postoperatively (97.4% vs 75.6%, p = 0.012). CT examination revealed well-pneumatized middle ears 24 months after surgery in both group. However, epithelial pearls near the umbo were seen at 31 months postoperatively in one patient in the observation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the endoscopic cartilage with perichondrium composite graft underlay technique, endoscopic perichondrial graft overlay and cartilage underlay had a better long-term graft success rate and lower rate of long-term re-perforation in teenagers. However, the graft technique had no effect on hearing outcome.

Long-Term Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Patients With Blast-Induced Tympanic Membrane Perforations

OBJECTIVE

To describe characteristics of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in patients with blast-induced tympanic membrane (TM) perforations that required surgery.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of hearing outcomes in those who had tympanoplasty for combat blast-induced TM perforations. These were sequential cases from one military otolaryngologist from 2007 to 2012. A total of 87 patients were reviewed, and of those, 49 who had appropriate preinjury, preoperative, and long-term audiograms were included. Those with pre-existing hearing loss were excluded. Preinjury audiograms were used to assess how sensorineural thresholds changed in the ruptured ears, and in the contralateral ear in those with unilateral perforations.

RESULTS

The mean time from injury to the final postoperative audiogram was 522 days. In the ears with TM perforations, 70% had SNHLs of 10 dB or less (by bone conduction pure tone averages). Meanwhile, approximately 8% had threshold shifts >30 dB, averaging 50 dB. The strongest predictor of severe or profound hearing loss was ossicular discontinuity. Thresholds also correlated with bilateral injury and perforation size. In those with unilateral perforations, the SNHL was almost always larger on the side with the perforation. Those with SNHL often had a low-to-mid frequency threshold shift and, in general, audiograms that were flatter across frequencies than those of a typical population of military personnel with similar levels of overall hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a bimodal distribution of hearing loss in those who experience a blast exposure severe enough to perforate at least one TM. Most ears recover close to their preinjury thresholds, but a minority experience much larger sensorineural threshold shifts. Blast exposed ears also tend to have a flatter audiogram than most service members with similar levels of hearing loss.

Update on treatment options for blast-induced hearing loss

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of blast injuries has increased, and the ear is the highest risk organ. Ear injury induced by blast exposure is important in both military and civilian conditions. The permanent hearing loss caused by blast exposure is associated with a decline in the quality of life. In this review, I describe recent therapeutic strategies for each of the ear pathologies caused by blast exposure.

RECENT FINDINGS

For tympanic membrane perforation after blast exposure, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) has been used as a less invasive treatment to repair the tympanic membrane. The closure rates of tympanic membrane perforations treated with bFGF were reported to be comparable to those following conventional tympanoplasty.For sensorineural hearing loss after blast exposure, treatment with neurotrophic factors, such as nerve growth factor (NGF) or neurotrophin-3, antioxidants, and Atoh1 induction have recently been applied, and some of them were considered for clinical application.

SUMMARY

Recent advances of therapeutics for blast-induced hearing loss, based on their pathologies, have been outlined. There are several promising therapeutic approaches for both middle and inner ear disorders after blast exposure; however, further research is needed to establish new treatments for blast-induced hearing dysfunction.

Tympanoplasty following Blast Injury

Objectives

To assess outcomes following tympanoplasty for blast-induced tympanic membrane perforations in a military population.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Tertiary care medical centers.

Subjects and Methods

Military personnel (N = 254) undergoing tympanoplasty for blast-related tympanic membrane perforations sustained between April 2005 and July 2014 were identified from the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database. Descriptive statistics were obtained regarding demographics, primary and revision surgery success rates, hearing status pre- and postsurgery, and frequency of ossicular reconstruction. Rates of successful perforation closure were assessed against perforation size and character (central vs marginal) and time to surgery. Rates and types of complications were additionally explored.

Results

There were a total of 352 operations among 254 subjects, with an 82.1% rate of successful closure following primary surgery. For successful primary tympanoplasty, the mean improvement in pure tone average was 11.7 ± 12.1 dB. Ossiculoplasty was performed in 9.1% (32 of 352) of cases. There was no significant relationship between successful perforation closure and perforation size, perforation character, or time between injury and surgery. Cholesteatoma complicated 4.3% (15 of 352) of cases. A significant relationship was identified between risk of cholesteatoma development and increasing perforation size and marginal perforations.

Conclusion

Tympanoplasty success rates for blast-induced tympanic membrane perforations are lower than for other common injury mechanisms. Due to appreciable rates of postoperative cholesteatoma development, close clinical surveillance is recommended.