Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review

Link between pharyngeal acid reflux episodes and the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed, reliable predictors of their responsiveness are unclear. Reflux monitoring technologies like dual potential of hydrogen (pH) sensors and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) could improve diagnosis. Research suggests that a composite pH parameter, defined by ≥ 2 pharyngeal acid reflux (PAR) episodes and/or excessive esophageal acid reflux (EAR), predicts PPI efficacy. The criteria for PAR episodes, a pharyngeal pH drop of ≥ 2 units to < 5 within 30 seconds during esophageal acidification, showed strong interobserver reliability. We hypothesized that PAR episodes alone might also predict PPI responsiveness.

AIM

To investigate whether PAR episodes alone predict a positive response to PPI therapy.

METHODS

Patients suspected of having LPR were prospectively recruited from otolaryngologic clinics in three Taiwanese tertiary centers. They underwent a 24-hour esophagopharyngeal pH test using either 3-pH-sensor or hypopharyngeal MII-pH catheters while off medication, followed by a 12-week esomeprazole course (40 mg twice daily). Participants were categorized into four groups based on pH results: PAR alone, EAR alone, both pH (+), and both pH (-). The primary outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in primary laryngeal symptoms, with observers blinded to group assignments.

RESULTS

A total of 522 patients (mean age 52.3 ± 12.8 years, 54% male) were recruited. Of these, 190 (mean age 51.5 ± 12.4 years, 61% male) completed the treatment, and 89 (47%) responded to PPI therapy. Response rates were highest in the PAR alone group (73%, n = 11), followed by EAR alone (59%, n = 68), both pH (+) (56%, n = 18), and both pH (-) (33%, n = 93). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and endoscopic esophagitis showed that participants with PAR alone, EAR alone, and both pH (+) were 7.4-fold (P = 0.008), 4.2-fold (P = 0.0002), and 3.4-fold (P = 0.03) more likely to respond to PPI therapy, respectively, compared to the both pH (-) group. Secondary analyses using the definition of ≥ 1 PAR episode were less robust.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of proven hypopharyngeal predictors, this post-hoc analysis found that baseline ≥ 2 PAR episodes alone are linked to PPI responsiveness, suggesting the importance of hypopharyngeal reflux monitoring.

Salivary pH testing in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

To determine salivary pH in patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) and compare it with that of normal individuals. A cross sectional analytical study was done. Adults with LPR as determined by Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) > 13 and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) > 7 were included in LPR group. Normal healthy adult participants with Reflux Symptom Index ≤ 3 and Reflux Finding Score ≤ 2 were included in non LPR group.32 participants were included in each groups. Salivary pH was determined in all participants using a standardized pH meter. Difference in salivary pH between two groups was statistically analyzed. The mean salivary pH in LPR group was 7.43 ± 0.77 and in non LPR group 7.0 ± 0.77. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean salivary pH between the two groups as determined by p value 0.004. The results of our exploratory study showed statistically significant difference in salivary pH between LPR and non LPR group. The salivary pH in 10(31.2%) out of 32 participants in LPR group was beyond the normal range and surprisingly the value was > 7.6, which was in contrast to acidic pH that was expected as per hypothesis. The rest 68.8% in LPR group had pH in the normal range. However salivary pH as a modality for diagnosing LPR cannot be concluded from such preliminary study with a small study population. This study forms a basis for future research for the role of salivary pH in LPR with better study designs and finer modalities of pH testing.

Salivary pepsin testing for laryngopharyngeal reflux: will it change our management?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focus on the clinical value of salivary and laryngopharyngeal tissue pepsin measurement in the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

RECENT FINDINGS

A growing body of research suggests that salivary pepsin detection provides a noninvasive method for the identifying LPR occurrence. Pepsin detection testing is still variable, and an optimal method that balances utility with accuracy has not been agreed. Timing and number of test samples recommended also remains controversial, however literature indicates that increasing the number of tests over a day increases pepsin detection rate. It remains unclear whether detection of pepsin alone can be used to confirm LPR diagnosis. Pepsin positivity is correlated with improved response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, and therefore may play a role in guiding therapeutic choices. Detection of pepsin in laryngeal tissue has the same clinical value as detection in saliva and requires further investigation to determine utility.

SUMMARY

As a noninvasive method for the diagnosis of LPR, the detection of salivary pepsin in the oropharynx shows potential clinical value, however the exact method of detection and diagnostic values are unclear. Salivary or tissue-based pepsin detection may be helpful in predicting therapeutic effects of PPI and providing personalized treatment options. The detection threshold of salivary pepsin may be different in different countries and regions. Timing and number of samples needed for detection is still controversial.

Pharmacological and Biological Relevance in the Medical Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A State-of-the-Art Review

The laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) treatment remains controversial due to the poor effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In this paper, the author reviewed the current primary treatments used in clinical studies for managing LPRD and discussed the pharmacological, biological, and physiological properties of medication for providing clinical relevance for otolaryngological practice. A comprehensive review of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus literature was conducted to document and analyze the medical treatments of LPRD in the largest case series published in the past 20 years. Fifty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing that 67 different therapeutic regimens were used in the LPRD studies in the past 20 years with nine different therapeutic durations. PPIs have been used as a single therapy in 70.1% of cases. PPIs were combined with another drug in 23.9% of cases. Alginates and antacids were used as single therapy or in association with other drugs in 10.5% and 3.0% of cases, respectively. There was an important variability of molecules, doses, and regimens. There is an important gap between current therapeutic practice and the recent advancements in the pathophysiology of LPRD. The pharmacological and physiological findings of this review can reasonably support the notion that alternative gastroesophageal reflux disease therapies (alginate, antacids) could take a significant place in the treatment of primary or recalcitrant LPRD. Future studies are needed to confirm the stability of the LPRD profile at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH and the role of digestive enzymes in the development of upper aerodigestive tract mucosa inflammation and symptoms.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Clinic: An Epidemiological Survey

Background and Objectives: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) has been implicated in the etiology of many laryngeal disorders and is also closely related to the occurrence and progression of a variety of throat diseases, including chronic cough, leukoplakia of the larynx, dysphonia, and even laryngeal tumors. LPRD can significantly reduce the quality of life of patients and cause substantial medical and economic burdens to the society. Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), a self-administered 9-item outcomes instrument for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), has been widely used to screen for LPRD, but there is a lack of feasibility studies on the use of RSI for LPRD screening and alternative diagnostic tools in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) clinics. To study the incidence, clinical characteristics, diagnostic status, and influencing factors of LPRD at OHNS clinics, RSI as an alternative diagnostic tool has also been studied. LPRD was defined as RSI > 13. Methods: Systematic collection of data by the RSI questionnaire was used to identify patients in the outpatient clinic suffering from LPRD; in addition, the personal history of participants was collected. Follow-up observation was carried out for 6 months for patients with suspected LPRD (RSI > 13), including whether they were treated with standardized anti-reflux therapy, and the questionnaire based on RSI was completed again after treatment. Results: The LPRD rate was 7.92% (94/1187) in this survey. The proportions of LPRD patients with smoking history (vs no smoking) and alcohol consumption history (vs. no alcohol consumption) were significantly higher (χ2 values: 7.025 and 4.562, and P values: .008 and .033; respectively). Smoking significantly increased the risk of LPRD (OR: 2.140, 95% CI: 1.058-4.331, P = .034). Among patients with LPRD positive, the incidence of "foreign body sensation in the throat" (symptom 8) score equal to 5 was the highest (19.15%). The severity of "excess mucus in the throat or postnasal drip" (symptom 3) contributed mostly to the total RSI score in patients with LPRD (r = .409, P < .001). ROC curve analysis showed that RSI ≥ 14 had a sensitivity of 72.9% and a specificity of 71.4% for the diagnosis of LPRD, with AUC = 0.797 (95% CI: 0.577-0.884, P < .001). Conclusions: The incidence of LPRD was high in patients we examined in OHNS clinics. We recommend that RSI can be used by otolaryngologists as a reliable tool for screening and diagnosing LPRD in OHNS clinics, which is beneficial for clinical practice.

The Inhibitory Effect of Hedera helix and Coptidis Rhizome Mixture in the Pathogenesis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Cleavage of E-Cadherin in Acid-Exposed Primary Human Pharyngeal Epithelial Cells

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a prevalent upper airway disorder characterized by inflammation and epithelial damage due to the backflow of gastric contents. Current treatments, primarily proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), often show variable efficacy, necessitating the exploration of alternative or adjunctive therapies. This study investigates the therapeutic potential of a mixture of Hedera helix and Coptidis rhizome (HHCR) in mitigating the pathophysiological mechanisms of LPRD. Using an in vitro model of human pharyngeal epithelial cells exposed to acidic conditions, we observed that acid exposure significantly increased the expression of adenosine A3 receptor (adenosine A3) and matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7), leading to E-cadherin cleavage and compromised epithelial integrity. Treatment with the HHCR mixture effectively suppressed adenosine A3 expression and MMP-7 activity, thereby reducing E-cadherin cleavage and preserving cellular cohesion. These results highlight the HHCR mixture's ability to modulate the adenosine A3-MMP-7-E-cadherin pathway, suggesting its potential as a valuable adjunctive therapy for LPRD, particularly for patients unresponsive to conventional PPI treatment. This study provides new insights into the molecular interactions involved in LPRD and supports further clinical evaluation of HHCR as a complementary treatment option.

The 2-week wait pathway for suspected head and neck cancers in patients with throat and voice symptoms: referral patterns, common clinical practice and diagnostic efficacy of NICE guidelines

INTRODUCTION

The 2-week wait (2ww) referral pathway has been introduced into UK clinical practice to increase the early detection of cancer and improve survivals. The efficiency of this system for head and neck (H&N) cancers has been questioned over the years because of evidence of low pick-up rates. H&N cancers present with a wide variety of non-specific symptoms, particularly throat and voice symptoms. These symptoms need to be accurately interpreted together with risk factors if they are to be addressed adequately and overload of cancer facilities avoided. One of the most common outcomes of H&N 2ww referrals is laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), a common condition that could be diagnosed and managed in the primary care setting with a prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) trials.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed a cohort of consecutive patients referred on the 2ww pathway for throat and voice symptoms at University College London Hospital H&N cancer clinic during two months in 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients (43.6% men, mean age 53.3 years) were included. Throat and voice symptoms were described as intermittent in 52.5% and non-lateralised in 88.1%. Diagnosis of LPR was made in 59.4% of the referrals. A PPI trial was prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) in only 7.9% of cases. The cancer pick-up rate in our cohort is 2.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

An improved awareness of the symptoms of LPR could guide GPs to prescribe trials of PPIs in low-risk patients before rushing into a referral on a cancer pathway. This would improve the 2ww process on many levels, reduce the burden on the National Health Service and avoid patients' psychological distress.

Efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is mainly treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) such as esomeprazole, which have shortcomings like delayed absorption and increased osteoporosis. Fexuprazan is a novel potent potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid secretion with rapid onset and long duration of action. To assess the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared to esomeprazole in patients with LPRD.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, active-controlled trial was conducted in nine otolaryngologic clinics. Patients with reflux symptom index (RSI) ≥ 13 and reflux finding score (RFS) ≥ 7 were randomly assigned to the fexuprazan or esomeprazole groups, and received fexuprazan 40-mg or esomeprazole 40-mg once daily for 8 weeks. The outcomes were (1) mean change, change rate, and valid rate in RSI, RFS, and LPR-related questionnaires; and (2) adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients (fexuprazan n = 68, esomeprazole n = 68) were followed up for ≥ 1 month. Each parameter significantly improved after 4 and 8 weeks in each group, with no significant differences between the two groups. For those with severe symptoms (RSI ≥ 18), the fexuprazan group (n = 32) showed more improvement in the mean change and change rate in the RSI than esomeprazole group (n = 31) after 4 weeks (p = .036 and .045, respectively). This phenomenon was especially observed in hoarseness and troublesome cough.

CONCLUSION

Fexuprazan improved symptoms and signs without no serious adverse events in patients with LPRD. In patients with severe symptoms, fexuprazan resulted in a faster symptom improvement than PPI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

KCT0007251, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=22100 .

Advances in laryngopharyngeal reflux: Etiology, diagnosis, and management

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) manifests as a variety of nonspecific upper aerodigestive tract symptoms. Rather than a single disorder, LPR may be conceived of as a spectrum of subtypes with varying clinical presentations. LPR signs and symptoms arise from the direct and/or indirect effects of refluxate, physical and molecular injury of the mucosa, and neurologic responses to esophageal events. Specific constituents of refluxate exert distinct mucosal responses and immediate or delayed effects resulting in transient or persistent symptoms and/or laryngeal hypersensitivity. While the complex etiology of LPR presents challenges to its diagnosis and management, tools that aid the identification of LPR subtypes can provide insight into treatment decision-making. Hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring provides detailed analysis of reflux events, enabling the development of individualized treatment plans, yet cost and availability limit its widespread use. Alginates offer temporary symptom relief and antireflux surgery may provide benefit when symptoms are recalcitrant to other approaches. Pepsin inhibitors hold promise as a medical therapy when surgery is not an option. Laryngeal hypersensitivity should be considered as part of a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Promising medical and scientific research continues to yield new insights into the complex etiology of LPR and novel strategies for its diagnosis and management.

The Impact of a Twice-daily Versus Once-daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing Regimen on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Background/Aims

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) play a crucial role in managing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), but the optimal dosing regimen remains unclear. We aim to compare the effectiveness of the same total PPI dose administered twice daily versus once daily in LPR patients.

Methods

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial at a tertiary referral hospital, enrolling a total of 132 patients aged 19 to 79 with LPR. These patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 10 mg twice daily (BID) or a 20 mg once daily (QD) dose of ilaprazole for 12 weeks. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) were assessed at 8 weeks and 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the RSI response, defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the total RSI score from baseline. We also analyzed the efficacy of the dosing regimens and the impact of dosing and duration on treatment outcomes.

Results

The BID group did not display a higher response rate for RSI than the QD group. The changes in total RSI scores at the 8-week and 16- week visits showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Total RFS alterations were also comparable between both groups. Each dosing regimen demonstrated significant decreases in RSI and RFS.

Conclusions

Both BID and QD PPI dosing regimens improved subjective symptom scores and objective laryngoscopic findings. There was no significant difference in RSI improvement between the 2 dosing regimens, indicating that either dosing regimen could be considered a viable treatment option.

Salivary microbiota composition before and after use of proton pump inhibitors in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux: a self-control study

BACKGROUND

Issues associated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage have been documented. PPIs affect the gastrointestinal microbiome, as well as the saliva microbiota of healthy individuals. However, the alterations in the saliva microbiota of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients remain unclear. This study aims to examine the composition of saliva microbiota in LPR patients before and after PPI usage through a self-controlled study.

METHODS

Thirty-two adult LPR patients participated in the study. Saliva samples were collected before and after an 8-week regimen of twice-daily administration of 20-mg esomeprazole. The impact of PPI administration on bacterial communities was assessed using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. The functional and metabolic changes in saliva microbial communities after PPI usage were analyzed using PICRUSt2 based on our 16 S rRNA gene sequencing results.

RESULTS

The alpha diversity within the salivary microbiota, as measured by the PD-whole-tree index, exhibited a significant difference between samples collected before and after PPI application (P = 0.038). Additionally, PCoA analysis of unweighted UniFrac distances (beta diversity) revealed distinct separation of saliva sample microbiota structures before and after PPI application in LPR patients, with statistical significance (Adonis test, R2 = 0.063, P< 0.010). Taxon-based analysis indicated that PPI administration increased the abundance of Epsilonproteobacteria, Campylobacterales, Campylobacteraceae, Campylobacter, and Campylobacter_gracilis, while reducing the abundance of Lactobacillaceae and Lactobacillus in salivary samples ( P< 0.050). Using LEfSe to compare bacterial abundances, Bacillaceae and Anoxybacillus were found to be enriched before PPI usage in LPR patients. Furthermore, the proportion of genes responsible for indole alkaloid biosynthesis in the salivary microbiota of LPR patients significantly increased after PPI therapy (P< 0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that PPIs induce alterations in the salivary microbiota of LPR patients.

CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

No. ChiCTR2300067507. Registered on January 10,2023 retrospectively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Inter-rater Reliability of the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10) among otolaryngologists and speech therapists with various experiences.

METHODS

Six experts (2 otolaryngologists, 2 speech-therapists, and 2 speech-therapist students) rated 300 clinical images of oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal signs from patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease diagnosis at the 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. Inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were evaluated with Intraclass Correlation (ICC) and Cronbach-α. The severity of scores was compared between judges. The intra-rater (test-retest) reliability was evaluated with the Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The pictures of 40 patients were included. There were 18 females and 22 males. The mean age was 52.6 ± 13.9 years. The Cronbach-α was 0.854, which indicates a high internal consistency between judges. The overall ICC was 0.787 (95% CI: 0.715-0.845; P = 0.001). The ICC varied among judges with the highest value for students (ICC = 0.960) and SLP seniors versus students (ICC = 0.805). The severity of RSA-10 rating scores was influenced by the number of reflux patients seen (rs =-0.941; P = 0.001) and the number of fiberscope examinations performed (rs =-0.812; P = 0.049). The RSA-10 was more severely scored by speech therapists with the least experience compared to otolaryngologists with the most experience in fiberscope/reflux patient assessment.

CONCLUSION

The RSA-10 demonstrated adequate global ICC and internal consistency among otolaryngologists and speech therapists with various degrees of experience. The assessment of RSA was influenced by the fibroscopy experience, and the number of reflux patients seen.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among primary healthcare physicians

Objective

The aim of this study was to estimate the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) among primary healthcare (PHC) physicians in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This quantitative cross-sectional study used an online-based questionnaire distributed to physicians in PHC facilities and hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire consisted of four sections that provided data on demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Results

Of the 473 physicians included in the study, one-third were unaware of LPR, and two-thirds were unfamiliar with the reflux symptom index (RSI). The most common sources of LPR knowledge were textbooks and literature (49.8%). The most recognised risk factor, symptom, and complication were high body mass index (75.8%), voice problems (82.4%), and laryngeal cancer (70.6%), respectively. The most recognised diagnostic and treatment options were laryngoscopy (73.5%) and lifestyle modifications (87.3%), respectively, while only 60.4% of participants recognised proton pump inhibitors as a treatment option. Most PHC physicians believed that LPR is underdiagnosed and that primary prevention and awareness among the general population need to be improved.

Conclusions

One in three PHC physicians knew nothing about LPR, and two in three were unfamiliar with the RSI. More than half could not recognise all major symptoms of LPR, which might be a cause for concern, as recognising these symptoms is crucial for proper diagnosis. We recommend increasing the education of physicians about LPR, its signs and symptoms, and the RSI, all of which provide valuable clues for diagnosis.

Minimum Effective Duration of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease Treatment: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the minimum therapeutic duration for patients with primary laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) through the evaluation of symptom changes at multiple time points.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective uncontrolled.

SETTING

University medical center.

METHODS

Patients with LPRD at the 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring were recruited from the European Reflux Clinic. Depending on the type of LPRD, patients were treated with a combination of proton-pump inhibitors, alginate, or magaldrate. Symptoms were evaluated with the reflux symptom score (RSS) at baseline and throughout treatment (1-, 3-, 6-, and 9-month posttreatment). The most appropriate therapeutic duration was determined using the RSS changes. Signs were evaluated with the reflux sign assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients completed the study. The mean age was 49.9 ± 15.7 years. At 1-month posttreatment, 97 patients (61.0%) were considered as early responders to treatment, and the treatment was stopped for 52 patients (32.7%). Of the 62 early nonresponders, 34 patients (21.4%) reached responded to treatment after 3 to 9 months. The cumulative therapeutic success rate at 1-month posttreatment (61.0%) progressively increased to reach a range of 82.4% to 99.3% at 9-month posttreatment. The RSS mainly decreased in the first month of treatment in early responders. In early nonresponders, RSS progressively decreased throughout the 9-month treatment period. The baseline severity of RSS is a strong predictor of therapeutic response.

CONCLUSION

A therapeutic regimen of 1 month can be sufficient to treat one third of LPRD patients. The early nonresponders may require 3 to 9 months of treatment.

Psychosocial burden in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms with and without pathologic acid reflux

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms, with or without pathologic reflux, frequently have poor response to standard therapies, which may be a result of overlapping cognitive-affective processes. Therefore, the aims of this study included measuring psychosocial distress and laryngeal-specific cognitive distress in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) as well as comparing these among laryngeal symptomatic patients with and without conclusive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

This prospective, single-center study enrolled adults with chronic LPS from 9/22 to 6/23. Patients completed eight questionnaires on quality of life, symptom burden, and psychosocial distress. The laryngeal cognitive affective tool (LCAT) assessed laryngeal-specific hypervigilance and anxiety; LCAT scores ≥33 were elevated. All patients underwent objective testing with endoscopy and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring and were categorized as proven GERD (GER+) or no proven GERD (GER-).

KEY RESULTS

One hundred twenty-nine patients were included: 66% female, mean age 54.1 (17.5) years, mean BMI 27.6 (6.8) kg/m2, 66% Caucasian, 57% with an elevated LCAT, and 53% GER+. Moderate-to-severe anxiety was found in 39% and moderate-to-severe depression in 19%. An elevated LCAT alone or with an elevated anxiety/depression score was found in 58%. Patient-reported outcomes scores, including LCAT scores (32.9 (13.8) GER- vs. 33.1 (12.6) GER+, p = 0.91), were similar between patients with and without GER+.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Patients with chronic LPS experience heightened levels of hypervigilance, symptom-specific anxiety, and psychosocial distress, regardless of the presence of pathologic GER.

Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10)

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10) for documenting the physical findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).

METHODS

Patients with LPRD at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and asymptomatic individuals were consecutively recruited from two European hospitals. Three experienced otolaryngologists rated RSA-10 in patients and controls for assessing internal validity. RSA-10 was rated within a 7-day period to assess test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α in patients and controls. Convergent validity was evaluated through a correlation analysis between RSA-10 and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Interrater reliability was evaluated by comparing the RSA-10 evaluations of the three otolaryngologists through Fleiss kappa. Pre- to posttreatment change of RSA-10 was evaluated to assess responsiveness to change. The RSA-10 thresholds were examined by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients completed the pre- to posttreatment evaluations from January 2020 to December 2023. A total of 115 asymptomatic individuals completed the study. RSA-10 reported high internal consistency reliability (α = 0.822) and test-retest reliability (rs = 0.725). The RSA-10 scores of patients were significantly higher than those of controls (p = 0.001), suggesting high internal validity. RSA-10 was significantly correlated with the RFS (rs = 0.771). The interrater reliability was adequate for sub- and total RSA-10 scores (k = 0.708). RSA-10 significantly improved from baseline to 3-month posttreatment (p = 0.001). An RSA-10 > 13 may be suggestive of LPRD. Both RSA-10 > 13 and Reflux Symptom Score-12 > 11 were associated with a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 97.3%.

CONCLUSION

The RSA-10 is a reliable and valid clinical instrument for documenting the most prevalent laryngeal and extra-laryngeal findings associated with LPRD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:3981-3988, 2024.