1
|
Adams JK, Marinelli JP, DeJong RW, Spear SA, Erbele ID. National Trends in Cochlear Implantation Across the Department of the Defense: A Case for Inclusion as a General Otolaryngology Core Competency. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:e710-e714. [PMID: 37733998 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With ongoing national expansions in cochlear implantation (CI) candidacy criteria, more patients qualify for CI today than ever before. Among US veterans and military service members, the prevalence of qualifying degrees of hearing loss secondary to occupational noise exposure exceeds the general population. The primary aim of the current work was to evaluate CI trends across the military health system. STUDY DESIGN Database review. SETTING Military and civilian practices. PATIENTS Department of Defense (DoD) beneficiaries who underwent CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES CI rates between 2010 and 2019. RESULTS A total of 3,573 cochlear implant operations were performed among DoD beneficiaries from 2010 to 2019. A majority of patients (55%) were older than 64 years, with the next most commonly implanted age group being 0 to 4 years of age (14%). From 2010 to 2019, annual CI increased at a rate of 7.9% per year for all implantation over the study period ( r = 0.97, p < 0.0001); there was a statistically significant difference of this rate compared with tympanoplasty, which was used as a reference procedure (rate, -1.9%; p = 0.03). This trend was similar for beneficiaries implanted both in military (11.9% per year, r = 0.77, p = 0.009) and civilian facilities (7.7% per year, r = 0.96, p < 0.0001); there was no statistically significant difference between the annual growth rates of these groups ( p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS Although the number of devices implanted is rapidly increasing among DoD beneficiaries, reported national utilization rates remain low. This disparity likely exists in the general public, considering the aging demographic in the West and continual expansions in US Federal Drug Administration labeling. These data suggest that widespread expansion of the procedure to general otolaryngology practices will be required to meet current and future demands for CI. For this reason, CI should be considered for "key indicator" designation among residency training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason K Adams
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium
| | - John P Marinelli
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium
| | - Russell W DeJong
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gowrishankar SV, Fleet A, Tomasoni M, Durham R, Umeria R, Merchant SA, Shah SFH, Muzaffar J, Mohammed H, Kuhn I, Tysome J, Smith ME, Donnelly N, Axon P, Bance M, Borsetto D. The Risk of Meningitis After Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:467-481. [PMID: 36864717 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to estimate the rate of postoperative meningitis (both immediate and long-term) in patients following cochlear implants (CIs). It aims to do so through a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies tracking complications after CIs. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library. REVIEW METHODS This review was performed in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies tracking complications following CIs in patients were included. Exclusion criteria included non-English language studies and case series reporting <10 patients. Bias risk was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed through DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. RESULTS A total of 116/1931 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, there were 112 cases of meningitis in 58,940 patients after CIs. Meta-analysis estimated an overall rate of postoperative meningitis of 0.07% (95% confidence interval [CIs], 0.03%-0.1%; I2 = 55%). Subgroup meta-analysis showed this rate had 95% CIs crossing 0% in implanted patients who received the pneumococcal vaccine, antibiotic prophylaxis, those with postoperative acute otitis media (AOM), and those implanted less than 5 years. CONCLUSION Meningitis is a rare complication following CIs. Our estimated rates of meningitis after CIs appear lower than prior estimates based on epidemiological studies in the early 2000s. However, the rate still appears higher than the baseline rate in the general population. The risk was very low in implanted patients who received the pneumococcal vaccine, antibiotic prophylaxis, received unilateral or bilateral implantations, developed AOM, those implanted with a round window or cochleostomy techniques, and those under 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shravan V Gowrishankar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alex Fleet
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michele Tomasoni
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rory Durham
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rishi Umeria
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Serena A Merchant
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Syed F H Shah
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jameel Muzaffar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hassan Mohammed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Isla Kuhn
- Cambridge University Medical Library, Cambridge, UK
| | - James Tysome
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthew E Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Neil Donnelly
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Patrick Axon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Manohar Bance
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniele Borsetto
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu SS, Sbeih F, Anne S, Cohen MS, Schwartz S, Liu YCC, Appachi S. Auditory Outcomes in Children Who Undergo Cochlear Implantation Before 12 Months of Age: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:210-220. [PMID: 36939587 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the literature to determine auditory outcomes of cochlear implantation in children ≤12 months old. DATA SOURCE PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 9/1/2021 using PRISMA guidelines. REVIEW METHODS Studies analyzing auditory outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in children ≤12 months of age were included. Non-English studies and case reports were excluded. Outcome measures included functional and objective auditory results. Two independent reviewers evaluated each abstract and article. Heterogeneity and bias across studies were evaluated. RESULTS Of 305 articles identified, 17 met inclusion criteria. There were 642 children ages 2 to 12 months at CI. The most common etiologies of hearing loss were congenital CMV, meningitis, idiopathic hearing loss, and GJB2 mutations and other genetic causes. All studies concluded that early CI was safe. Overall, outcomes improved following early CI: IT-MAIS (9 studies), LittlEARS (4 studies), PTA (3 studies), CAP (3 studies), GASP (3 studies), and LNT (3 studies). Nine studies compared outcomes to an older implantation group (>12 months); of these (n = 450 early CI, n = 1189 late CI), 8 studies showed earlier CI achieved comparable or better auditory outcomes than later implantation, whereas 1 study (n = 120) concluded no differences in speech perception improvement. CONCLUSION Auditory outcomes were overall improved in children ≤12 months old undergoing CI. Studies that compared early to late CI demonstrated similar or better auditory outcomes in early implantation group. Given the comparable safety profile and critical time period of speech and language acquisition, earlier CI should be considered for infants with hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon S Wu
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Firas Sbeih
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Samantha Anne
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael S Cohen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Mass Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Seth Schwartz
- Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yi-Chun C Liu
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Swathi Appachi
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Culbertson SR, Dillon MT, Richter ME, Brown KD, Anderson MR, Hancock SL, Park LR. Younger Age at Cochlear Implant Activation Results in Improved Auditory Skill Development for Children With Congenital Deafness. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2022; 65:3539-3547. [PMID: 36001854 PMCID: PMC9913281 DOI: 10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The U.S. Food and Drug Administration indications for cochlear implantation in children is currently 9 months of age and older for children with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Studies have shown that earlier activation of a cochlear implant (CI) can lead to better spoken language outcomes. As auditory skills are a precursor to the development of spoken language, this study was developed to investigate the influence of age at CI activation on auditory skill acquisition in young children. A secondary aim was to describe the auditory skills of children implanted prior to 9 months of age as compared to children with older ages of activation. METHOD Functional Listening Index (FLI) scores obtained during routine clinical visits were reviewed for 78 pediatric CI recipients with congenital bilateral profound hearing loss who were activated before 2 years of age. A linear mixed-effects model assessed the effect of age at CI activation on cumulative FLI scores over time. RESULTS There was a significant interaction between age at activation and chronological age at the time of evaluation, indicating that children with earlier access to sound achieved a greater number of auditory skills than those with later CI activations when measured at the same chronological age. Children activated before the age of 9 months approximated scores expected of children with typical hearing, whereas children activated between 9 and 24 months of age did not. CONCLUSIONS Younger age at CI activation is associated with increased auditory skills over time. Children who undergo cochlear implantation and CI activation before 9 months achieve more auditory skills by 4 years of age than children who are activated at later ages. These data suggest that reducing the approved age at cochlear implantation for children with congenital bilateral profound SNHL may support optimal auditory skill acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon R. Culbertson
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Margaret T. Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Margaret E. Richter
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Kevin D. Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Melissa R. Anderson
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Sandra L. Hancock
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Lisa R. Park
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|