Feasibility and efficacy of an early sensory-motor rehabilitation program on hand function in patients with stroke: a pilot, single-subject experimental design

OBJECTIVE

Hand and upper limb functional impairments following stroke lead to limitations in performing activities of daily living. We aimed to investigate feasibility and efficacy of an early sensory-motor rehabilitation program on hand and upper limb function in patients with acute stroke.

DESIGN

A pilot, single-subject experimental, A-B-A study.

SETTING

Stroke unit of an educational hospital and an outpatient occupational therapy clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample including five people with acute stroke.

PROCEDURES

Participants received 3 h of an intensive hand and upper limb sensory and motor rehabilitation program, 5 days per week for 3 months (15-min mental imagery, 15-min action observation, 30-min mirror therapy, 1.5-h constraint-induced movement therapy, and 30-min bilateral arm training). Activities were chosen based on the task-oriented occupational therapy approach.

OUTCOME MEASURES

An assessor blinded to intervention program measured sensory and motor functions using action research arm test, box and block test, Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, and upper extremity section of Fugl-Meyer assessment.

RESULTS

Assessment data points in intervention and follow-up phases compared to baseline were in higher levels, sloped upwardly, and increased significantly for all participants in all outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The present pilot study showed that a package of nowadays evidence-based rehabilitation methods including mental imagery, action observation, mirror therapy, modified constraint-induced movement therapy, bilateral arm training, and task-oriented occupational therapy approach is able to improve sensory and motor functions of the hand and upper limb in patients with acute stroke.

Novice Occupational Therapy Practitioners’ Use of Occupation in Practice: A Scoping Review

An occupation-centered perspective is a foundational component defining occupational therapy practice. A scoping review was conducted of research studies from 2002 - 2020 describing novice occupational therapy practitioners and occupation. Ten articles met the inclusion criteria. Novices acknowledged that using occupation was a source of professional tension, describing a mismatch between their education and workplace expectations. The cognitive load of occupation-centered practice influenced novices' avoidance of occupation. Few articles address novices' experiences using occupation in their practice. Existing research primarily addresses barriers limiting novices' use of occupation such as lack of supervision and confidence.

Perceived barriers to implementing occupation-based intervention

Abstract Introduction Occupation-based intervention (OBI) is defined as an intervention using a clients’ occupation and purposeful activities as a treatment medium to achieve the client’s goals. Several barriers to practising OBI have been reported in previous studies. However, limited research has been done to identify these perceived barriers to applying OBI in Malaysia’s various occupational therapy practice areas. Objective This study aimed to identify perceived barriers to applying OBI in Malaysia’s three main occupational therapy practice areas including physical, psychiatry and paediatric. Method A cross-sectional study design was employed, and participants were recruited using a purposive sampling strategy. Data was collected using an online survey from a Delphi study. Results Two hundred ninety-eight Malaysian occupational therapists aged between 22 and 56 years old participated in this study. The study identified several perceived barriers from the client factors, the contextual factors, occupation as treatment modalities and logistical issues. A statistically significant difference was found in the perceived barriers of applying OBI between different areas of occupational therapy practice (p=.013), working experience (p=.003), and position of occupational therapists (p=.001). Conclusion This study suggests that perceived barriers to applying OBI were influenced by the area of practice, working experience and position of the occupational therapists. The results highlight the need to identify potential solutions to applying OBI through research and education.

Occupational Therapy and the IMPACT Act: Part 2. A Systematic Review of Evidence for Functional Status, Medication Reconciliation, and Skin Integrity Interventions

IMPORTANCE

Interventions that promote function, medication reconciliation, and skin integrity assist occupational therapy practitioners in demonstrating professional value, improving quality, and reducing health care costs.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review, we focus on three outcome areas of the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation (IMPACT) Act of 2014: functional status, medication reconciliation, and skin integrity.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a search of the literature published between 2009 and 2019 in CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, OTseeker, and Scopus. We also hand searched the systematic reviews and meta-analyses in our search results for articles that met our inclusion criteria. Study Selection and Data Collection: This study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

FINDINGS

We found 47 articles that address the three outcome areas. Regarding functional status, low strength of evidence is available for cognition and functional mobility interventions to support functional performance, moderate strength of evidence supports interventions for vision, and moderate evidence supports task-oriented and individualized interventions to promote activities of daily living (ADL) outcomes among people with neurological conditions. Strong strength of evidence supports individualized occupational therapy interventions focusing on medication adherence. Low strength of evidence was found for occupational therapy interventions to reduce pressure ulcers and promote skin integrity. Conclusion and Relevance: The evidence supports occupational therapy interventions to improve functional status in ADLs and medication management. Additional research is needed that examines the outcomes of occupational therapy interventions for other areas of function and skin integrity. What This Article Adds: We found evidence to support occupational therapy interventions that align with value-based measures in the three outcome areas of interest. The effectiveness of these interventions highlights the viability of occupational therapy as an essential profession and the worth of occupational therapy to the public, potential clients, and payers.

The use of occupation-based interventions and assessments in hand therapy: A cross-sectional survey

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to gather information on how hand therapists incorporate occupation-based interventions in their clinical practice and what outcome measures hand therapists use to measure the occupational performance of their clients STUDY DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Survey Design.

METHODS

The 16-item Survey was distributed to members of the American Society of Hand Therapists on two occasions.

RESULTS

Three hundred eleven hand therapists responded to the survey. Hand therapists use a variety of occupation-based interventions (OBI) in clinical practice and most believe they are important. Findings from this study reveal that incorporating an occupation-based assessment along with or in place of an assessment of body functions and structures is not performed routinely. One hundred twenty-six (41%) respondents indicated that they use occupation-based activities 26-50% of the time with their clients.

DISCUSSION

The top three OBI interventions used by hand therapists included dressing tasks, cooking and meal preparation, and in hand manipulation of coins and medication. The lack of understanding of the theoretical models regarding occupation-based interventions may be a barrier toward implementation of occupation-based interventions and assessments as many hand therapists may have trained under a medical model.

CONCLUSION

Most respondents to this survey indicated that they believe OBI should be performed by hand therapists and use them routinely in practice. The most frequently used type of assessment was the DASH (Disabilities of the Shoulder Arm & Hand). The least frequently used assessment was the Short Form 36 and patient specific occupation-based assessment.

Occupation-based intervention in therapy for upper limb musculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review

Introduction

Using meaningful activities as a treatment modality is characteristic of occupation-based intervention (OBI). The benefits of OBI have been described, but not the effectiveness thereof. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of OBI in relation to the type, commencement, duration and outcomes as reported in literature.

Methods

A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted, including EBSCOHost, PubMed, Cochrane Register for Controlled Trials, Web of Science, OTSeeker, PEDro and Google Scholar. Search terms included 'occupation-based', 'occupation-centered', 'intervention', 'upper limb' and 'outcome measures'. Studies including OBI for neurological or paediatric cases were excluded.

Results

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Using the PEDro scale, three of the studies, all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), were viewed as high quality, one of fair and one of poor quality. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, a meta-analysis was not possible, and a narrative synthesis is presented. Five studies used interviewing together with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) to determine the client's occupational profile when choosing meaningful activities. The commencement and duration of OBI varied amongst the studies, and a variety of outcome measures were used to determine the effectiveness of OBI.

Discussion

OBI used together with biomechanical approaches shows promising effectiveness. Outcome measures such as the COPM and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) that measure activity and participation, should be employed in client-centered practice. More robust scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of OBI is needed.

Effect of hand dominance on functional outcomes in paediatric patients with flexor tendon injuries: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data in the literature about the short- to mid-term results of children with flexor tendon injuries. We aim to evaluate the short- to mid-term functional outcomes of children with flexor tendon injuries and to disclose whether the injured side affects the results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had undergone primary flexor tendon repair were included in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. Modified Hand Injury Severity Score was calculated for each patient. Sensory, motor and functional assessments of the bilateral hand were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients (female = 16, male = 28) with a median age of 13 (6-17) were evaluated. Significant differences between the affected and healthy hands of the patients in terms of grip and pinch strengths and monofilament sensory test results were demonstrated while the Jebson Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT) scores were similar. No factor other than the injury side was found to be related to the affected hand functions. In patients with dominant hand injuries, JTHFT results of the affected hands were similar to the results of healthy dominant hands (P = .935). However, JTHFT results were found to be worse in the affected non-dominant hands compared to healthy non-dominant hands (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that paediatric population with flexor tendon injuries in their dominant hands has better short- to mid-term functional outcomes. These results may be attributed to use their injured dominant hand more actively in daily activities.

The use of augmented reality for rehabilitation after stroke: a narrative review

PURPOSE

To explore research relating to the use of Augmented Reality (AR) technology for rehabilitation after stroke in order to better understand the current, and potential future application of this technology to enhance stroke rehabilitation.

METHODS

Database searches and reference list screening were conducted to identify studies relating to the use of AR for stroke rehabilitation. These studies were then reviewed and summarised.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were identified where AR was used for upper or lower limb rehabilitation following stroke. The findings of these studies indicate the technology is in the early stages of development and application. No clear definition of AR was established, with some confusion between virtual and augmented reality identified. Most AR systems engaged users in rote exercises which lacked an occupational focus and contextual relevance. User experience was mostly positive, however the poor quality of the studies limits generalisability of these findings to the greater stroke survivor population.

CONCLUSION

AR systems are currently being used for stroke rehabilitation in a variety of ways however the technology is in its infancy and warrants further investigation. A consistent definition of AR must be developed and further research is required to determine the possibilities of using AR to promote practice of occupations in a more contextually relevant environment to enhance motor learning and generalisation to other tasks. This could include using AR to bring the home environment into the hospital setting to enhance practice of prioritised occupations before returning home.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThere is a developing body of evidence evaluating the use of various forms of AR technology for stroke rehabilitation.User motivation and engagement in rehabilitation may improve with the use of AR.A clear and consistent definition for AR must be developed.Ongoing work could explore how AR systems support engagement in, and promote motor learning that links to, meaningful occupations.

A systematic review of the benefits of occupation-based intervention for patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review of intervention studies (level 3a).

INTRODUCTION

Occupation-based intervention (OBI) uses daily activities as a treatment modality. Its growing use with patients diagnosed with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (UE MSK) has driven interest in its supporting body of evidence.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study was to locate, appraise, and summarize current evidence of the effectiveness of OBI in treating patients with UE MSK.

METHODS

Searches of PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Register for Controlled Trials, and PEDro databases were conducted using predetermined keywords. Studies included in this systematic review described the use of OBI in UE MSK. Two examiners independently reviewed and assessed the quality of each study using the PEDro scale.

RESULTS

Results of the database searches yielded 991 studies, 13 of which were deemed eligible to include in this review (6 randomized controlled trials, 4 pretreatment/post-treatment cohort or case series studies, and 3 single case reports). Quality of the studies varied, with 4 rated poor, 2 moderate, and 4 excellent. Overall, individuals receiving OBI showed superior benefits in patient-reported, performance, and physical measures assessing the upper extremity.

DISCUSSION

Findings of this review provide preliminary evidence for the use of OBI with patients with UE MSK, however, generalizability of the evidence was compromised due to heterogeneity in study subjects as well as conceptualization, dosage, and delivery of OBI.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing literature reflects promising trends in the use of OBI, underscoring its utility as a treatment option for UE MSK-related impairment, limitations, and restrictions. Nonetheless, scientific evidence concerning the effectiveness of OBI needs to be improved by conducting high-quality studies that clearly conceptualize this intervention and heighten understanding of its role in hand therapy practice.

Linking commonly used hand therapy outcome measures to individual areas of the International Classification of Functioning: A systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

INTRODUCTION

Identifying outcome measures that correspond to the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) provides insight into selecting appropriate outcome tools in hand therapy practice.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The objective of this study is to systematically review patient-reported outcome measures commonly used in hand therapy to determine the extent to which the content represents the biopsychosocial view of the ICF.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Studies that met inclusion criteria were identified, and outcome measures were extracted. The meaningful concept was determined for each item on the measure and linked to the most specific ICF category. Summary linkage calculations were completed.

RESULTS

Eleven patient-reported outcomes were identified from 43 included studies. Activity and participation had the highest content coverage followed by body functions. There was linking to personal factors and not defined-disability and mental health. Environmental factors were not represented in any of the included outcome measures. The core set representation of unique codes ranged from 8.55% to 18.80% (mean: 11.97%) for the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions and from 30.43% to 47.83% (mean: 31.40%) for the Brief ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions. The percent representation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions for unique disability ranged from 21.62% to 43.24% (mean: 20.33%) and from 62.50% to 87.50% (mean: 72.22%) for the Brief ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions.

DISCUSSION

None of the included measures represent all categories of the ICF Core Sets for Hand Conditions.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing the most recent refinement rules for the linking process, this study provides comparisons of measures along with clarity of content coverage for the most commonly used tools in the practice of hand therapy.

Hand therapy or not following collagenase treatment for Dupuytren's contracture? Protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Dupuytren’s contracture (DC) is a fibrotic hand condition in which one or more fingers develop progressive flexion deformities. Quality of life is diminished due to disabling limitations in performing everyday activities. For DC patients treated with collagenase, referral for subsequent hand therapy is inconsistent. It is unknown whether subsequent hand therapy is beneficial compared to no therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine whether hand therapy improves DC patients’ performance of and satisfaction with performing everyday activities one year after collagenase treatment.

Methods

We will conduct a randomised controlled trial with two treatment groups (hand therapy vs. control) of DC patients who have received collagenase treatment. DC patients with contracted metacarpophalangeal joint(s) (MCPJ) (hand therapy, n = 40; control, n = 40) and those with proximal interphalangeal joint(s) (PIPJ) involvement (hand therapy, n = 40; control, n = 40) comprise two subgroups, and we will study if the treatment effect will be different between both groups (n = 160). Patients with a previous injury or treatment for DC in the treatment finger are excluded. Hand therapy includes oedema and scar management, splinting, movement exercises, and practice of everyday activities. The main outcome variable is patients’ performance of and satisfaction with performing everyday activities, as assessed with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Secondary outcomes are DC-specific activity problems, as assessed with the Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main scale, and active/passive flexion/extension of treated joints and grip force using standard measuring tools, and self-reported pain level. Demographic and clinical variables, degree of scarring, cold hypersensitivity, number of occupational sick-leave days are collected. Self-reported global impression of change will be used to assess patient satisfaction with change in hand function. Assessments are done pre-injection and 6 weeks, 4 months, and 1 year later. Standard univariate and multivariate statistical analyses will be used to evaluate group differences.

Discussion

This study aims to assess whether hand therapy is beneficial for activity-related, biomechanical, and clinical outcomes in DC patients after collagenase treatment. The results will provide an objective basis for determining whether hand therapy should be conducted after collagenase treatment.

Trial registration

This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03580213 (April 5, 2018).