Post stroke intervention trial in fatigue (POSITIF): Randomised multicentre feasibility trial

Exploring rest advice in fatigue interventions in rehabilitation among adults with long-term conditions: a systematic scoping review of the reporting of rest in randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To explore how rest is described or included as part of rest advice in fatigue interventions within rehabilitation for adults with Long-term conditions (LTC).

DATA SOURCES

This scoping review identified fatigue interventions through PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database, from inception to July 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Two independent reviewers screened and selected the articles. Studies were included if they: (1) involved adults with LTC, (2) used non-pharmacological fatigue interventions, (3) had fatigue as the primary outcome, and (4) were randomised controlled trials (5). Only randomised controlled trials that include rest advice in the interventions were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

Extracted data included the first author's name, year of publication, country, type of LTC, intervention category, specific interventions, how rest was reported in all interventions. Furthermore, rest was reported using the FITT principle, focusing on the frequency, intensity, duration, and type of rest in the exercise interventions and key conclusions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Results were summarised, tabulated, and reported descriptively. Out of 13,645 initial records, 56 studies were included in the review. Of the total interventions analysed, 55.4% (31/56) were classified as physical activity interventions, 14.3% (8/56) as psychological interventions (e.g., cognitive behavioural therapy), 12.5% (7/56) were identified as energy management strategies, 8.9% (5/56) as educational interventions, and 8.9% (5/56) as activity pacing strategies. A disparity was observed in the instruction of rest advice between exercise interventions and daily fatigue management strategies. Specifically, physical activity interventions tended to adopt a more prescriptive approach to rest, whereas rest in daily fatigue management strategies was primarily instructed through education on the importance of rest in daily life. Notably, the level of detail provided in reporting rest parameters was generally limited.

CONCLUSIONS

This review found insufficient reporting of rest, highlighting a significant gap and indicating the need for improved documentation and standardisation of rest in fatigue interventions. Future research is necessary to better understand the role of rest in the rehabilitation of LTC.

Audio-Based Care for Managing Chronic Conditions in Adults: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus on the effectiveness of audio-based care to manage chronic conditions. This knowledge gap has implications for health policy decisions and for health equity, as underserved populations are more likely to access care by telephone.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the effectiveness of audio-based care to usual care for managing chronic conditions (except diabetes).

DESIGN

We used systematic review methods to synthesize available evidence.

STUDIES

We searched for English-language articles reporting on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults diagnosed with a chronic condition published since 2012.

OUTCOMES

We abstracted data on clinical outcomes, patient-reported health and quality of life, health care access and utilization, care quality and experience, and patient safety.

RESULTS

We included 40 RCTs evaluating audio-based care for a variety of chronic conditions, including cancer, heart failure, neurological disease, respiratory disease, musculoskeletal conditions, kidney disease, and others. There was significant heterogeneity across conditions and interventions. We generally found low to very low certainty of evidence of comparable effectiveness in the use of audio-based care to replace other care. Audio care as a supplement exhibited greater effectiveness in some outcomes, with generally low to very low certainty of evidence for most outcomes but moderate certainty for 2 groups of study outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

More research is needed to identify the conditions, populations, and intervention design combinations that improve outcomes and to determine when audio-based care can effectively replace other synchronous care.

Fatigue After Stroke Educational Recovery Program: A Prospective, Phase III, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Poststroke fatigue affects ≈50% of patients with stroke, causing significant personal, societal, and economic burden. In the FASTER (Fatigue After Stroke Educational Recovery) study, we assessed a group-based educational intervention for poststroke fatigue.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred patients with clinically significant fatigue were included and randomized to either a general stroke education control or fatigue management group (FMG) intervention and assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months. The FMG involved weekly psychoeducation sessions over 6 weeks. Coprimary outcomes were the Fatigue Severity Scale and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 total scores. Adjusted mean total Fatigue Severity Scale scores at 6 weeks (primary end point) were nearly identical for the education control and FMG groups. The adjusted mean difference between treatment groups was -0.13 (SE, 1.4; P=0.92) at 6 weeks and 1.67 (SE, 1.4; P=0.26) at 3 months. Although there were no significant effects, Fatigue Severity Scale outcomes were in the direction of a treatment effect based on the estimated change. Adjusted mean total Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 scores at 6 weeks (primary end point) were similar for the education control and FMG groups. The adjusted mean difference between treatment groups was -0.91 (SE, 1.54; P=0.55) at 6 weeks and -1.26 (SE, 1.8; P=0.49) at 3 months. Both groups had similar secondary outcomes (eg, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 subscales, sleep, pain, mood, quality of life) at 6 weeks and 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of significant group-level benefits of FMG over and above general stroke education. Educational group-based interventions for poststroke fatigue should continue to be refined and examined, including consideration of potential impacts at an individual level.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/; UnIque identifier: ACTRN12619000626167.

Interventions to Support the Return to Work for Individuals with Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

An increasing number of individuals with stroke are having difficulties in returning to work, having a significant impact on both individuals and society. The aims of this meta-analysis were to summarize the interventions to support the return to work (RTW) for individuals with stroke and to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of each type of intervention.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched until 26 June 2023, and the list of references of the initially included articles was also searched. Two researchers independently performed the search, screening, selection, and data extraction. The primary outcome was RTW rate (the RTW rate was defined as the proportion of individuals who returned to work in each group (intervention and control) at the endpoint). Pooled risk ratio (RR) was estimated using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies representing 4,282 individuals with stroke were included in our study. Results showed that physiological interventions could improve the RTW rate of individuals with stroke (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.42, I2 = 72%). And receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy was beneficial in promoting the RTW in individuals with stroke. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis showed that the individuals' functional status during hospitalization was the only source of heterogeneity. Psychological interventions had little or no effect on the RTW rate of individuals with stroke (RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.58 to 2.51, I2 = 30%). Work-related interventions had little or no effect on the RTW rate of the individuals with stroke (RR:1.36,95%CI: 0.99 to 1.88, I2 = 73%). The subgroup analysis showed that country, age, and follow-up method were the sources of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Physiological intervention promoted the RTW of individuals with stroke. But, the effect of psychological and work-related interventions in promoting the RTW of individuals with stroke was not significant. We anticipate that these findings may inform the design of future interventions. For future research, we recommend that more high-quality randomized controlled trials be conducted to further promote the RTW of individuals with stroke.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Registration Number, CRD42023443668.

Post-stroke fatigue interventions for stroke survivors: A scoping review

Background

Fatigue following a stroke, known as post-stroke fatigue (PSF), is a frequent complication experienced by individuals recovering from a stroke, with its incidence steadily increasing over time. The long-term presence of PSF significantly hinders the rehabilitation process and quality of life for these individuals. However, the most effective intervention strategies for PSF remain unclear. Therefore, it is crucial to implement appropriate intervention strategies at an early stage to prevent and manage PSF, thereby mitigating its negative impacts and promoting recovery in stroke survivors.

Objective

This scoping review aimed to explore and chart the interventions available for managing post-stroke fatigue in individuals recovering from stroke, providing healthcare professionals with evidence to guide the development of optimal treatments.

Design

A scoping review.

Data Sources

This review conducted a systematic search across six databases⎯PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus and CINAHL (via EBSCO), and CNKI, for articles published from 10 January 2012 to early May 2024.

Review Methods

This review followed the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Studies were selected based on the PCC framework, focusing on specific participants, concepts, and contexts. Exclusion criteria included ongoing studies without results, articles without full text, posters, reviews, and protocols. Tables and narrative descriptions were used to present relevant information on the interventions and their outcomes during the review process.

Results

Twenty-seven studies were included, categorizing interventions for post-stroke fatigue into ten types: pharmacological treatments, physical activity, physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, respiratory training, music therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, health education management, Traditional Chinese Medicine, and environmental enrichment.

Conclusion

The interventions for post-stroke fatigue have demonstrated positive effects in alleviating fatigue symptoms among stroke survivors. However, some approaches have limitations, and the most effective treatment strategy remains unclear. The multidisciplinary collaboration between nurses and healthcare professionals plays a critical role in managing post-stroke fatigue by providing patients with education on fatigue prevention and treatment, along with personalized care plans, including one-on-one or group interventions. Future research should focus on increasing sample sizes and conducting multicenter trials to identify the most effective intervention strategies for managing post-stroke fatigue.

Exploring post-stroke fatigue from the perspective of stroke survivors: what strategies help? A qualitative study

PURPOSE

Post-stroke fatigue is a research priority for stroke survivors and health professionals but there is limited evidence to guide management. We aimed to explore (1) the experience of post-stroke fatigue from the perspective of stroke survivors and their caregivers and (2) fatigue management strategies that are used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. People with self-reported post-stroke fatigue and caregivers were recruited using maximum variation sampling. Analysis was done via the framework approach.

RESULTS

We recruited 17 stroke survivors, nine male (53%), most under 65 years (n = 12, 76%), and greater than 1-year post-stroke (n = 16, 94%, range 10-months to 22-years). One-third of participants self-reported having aphasia (n = 5, 36%). We also recruited eight caregivers, most of whom were female (n = 7, 88%). We identified four themes: (1) fatigue is unexpected after stroke and symptoms vary; (2) the individual experience of fatigue is complex, influenced by multifactorial and biopsychosocial factors; (3) learning to adapt and accept fatigue; and (4) Strategies to manage fatigue and personal approaches to rest.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-stroke fatigue experience varies presenting cognitively, physically, and psychologically according to a complex interplay of biopsychosocial factors and personal triggers. Self-management strategies are individualised and include organisation, medications, lifestyle modifications, and peer support.

Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on fatigue in people with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fatigue, a common problem following a stroke, can have negative effects on a person's daily life. There are no good interventions thus far for alleviating fatigue among those affected.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to evaluate the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on fatigue among people with stroke.

METHODS

A search was conducted for articles in seven databases, clinical trial registry, and backward and forward citations of included publications. Randomized controlled trials, including feasibility and pilot trials, of non-pharmacological interventions for managing fatigue or promoting sleep or both in people with stroke were included. The standardized mean difference in scores for fatigue was analyzed using random effects models.

RESULTS

Ten studies, with 806 participants, were analyzed. The identified interventions included physical interventions, cognitive interventions, a combination of physical and cognitive interventions, oxygen therapy, and complementary interventions. Non-pharmacological interventions had no significant immediate, short-term and medium-term effects on fatigue. The adverse effects of falls and arrhythmia were each found in one participant in circuit training. The risk of bias was high in all studies. The certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to low.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence in support of any non-pharmacological interventions for alleviating fatigue is still inconclusive in people with stroke. In view of the inadequacies of existing interventions and study designs, addressing the multidimensional characteristics of fatigue may be a possible direction in developing interventions. A robust study design with a larger sample size of people with stroke experiencing fatigue is required to evaluate the effects of interventions.

Non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of post-stroke fatigue: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Post-stroke fatigue (PSF) affects 50% of stroke survivors. Current guidance on management of this condition is limited.

AIMS

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify and analyze all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of PSF.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

Six electronic databases were searched from inception to January 2023 for English-language RCTs investigating the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions versus passive controls in patients with PSF. The primary outcome was fatigue severity at the end of the intervention. The Cochrane risk-of-bias (ROB)2 tool was used to assess evidence quality. A total of 7990 records were retrieved, 333 studies were scrutinized, and 13 completed RCTs (484 participants) were included. Interventions included psychological therapies, physical therapies, and brain stimulation. Nine studies provided sufficient data for meta-analysis, of which seven also had follow-up data. Fatigue severity was lower in the intervention groups at the end of the intervention compared with control (participants = 310, standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.57, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (-0.87 to -0.28)) and at follow-up (participants = 112, SMD = -0.36, 95% CIs (-0.83 to 0.10)). Certainty in the effect estimate was downgraded to low for a serious ROB and imprecision. Subgroup analysis revealed significant benefits with physical therapy and brain stimulation but not psychological therapies, though sample sizes were low.

CONCLUSION

Non-pharmacological interventions improved fatigue but the quality of evidence was low. Further RCTs are needed for PSF management.

A roadmap for research in post-stroke fatigue: Consensus-based core recommendations from the third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

RATIONALE

Fatigue affects almost half of all people living with stroke. Stroke survivors rank understanding fatigue and how to reduce it as one of the highest research priorities.

METHODS

We convened an interdisciplinary, international group of clinical and pre-clinical researchers and lived experience experts. We identified four priority areas: (1) best measurement tools for research, (2) clinical identification of fatigue and potentially modifiable causes, (3) promising interventions and recommendations for future trials, and (4) possible biological mechanisms of fatigue. Cross-cutting themes were aphasia and the voice of people with lived experience. Working parties were formed and structured consensus building processes were followed.

RESULTS

We present 20 recommendations covering outcome measures for research, development, and testing of new interventions and priority areas for future research on the biology of post-stroke fatigue. We developed and recommend the use of the Stroke Fatigue Clinical Assessment Tool.

CONCLUSIONS

By synthesizing current knowledge in post-stroke fatigue across clinical and pre-clinical fields, our work provides a roadmap for future research into post-stroke fatigue.

A roadmap for research in post-stroke fatigue: Consensus-based core recommendations from the third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

RATIONALE

Fatigue affects almost half of all people living with stroke. Stroke survivors rank understanding fatigue and how to reduce it as one of the highest research priorities.

METHODS

We convened an interdisciplinary, international group of clinical and pre-clinical researchers and lived experience experts. We identified four priority areas: (1) best measurement tools for research, (2) clinical identification of fatigue and potentially modifiable causes, (3) promising interventions and recommendations for future trials, and (4) possible biological mechanisms of fatigue. Cross-cutting themes were aphasia and the voice of people with lived experience. Working parties were formed and structured consensus building processes were followed.

RESULTS

We present 20 recommendations covering outcome measures for research, development, and testing of new interventions and priority areas for future research on the biology of post-stroke fatigue. We developed and recommend the use of the Stroke Fatigue Clinical Assessment Tool.

CONCLUSIONS

By synthesizing current knowledge in post-stroke fatigue across clinical and pre-clinical fields, our work provides a roadmap for future research into post-stroke fatigue.

Addressing mood and fatigue in return-to-work programmes after stroke: a systematic review

Introduction

Return-to-work is a key rehabilitation goal for many working aged stroke survivors, promoting an overall improvement of quality of life, social integration, and emotional wellbeing. Conversely, the failure to return-to-work contributes to a loss of identity, lowered self-esteem, social isolation, poorer quality of life and health outcomes. Return-to-work programmes have largely focused on physical and vocational rehabilitation, while neglecting to include mood and fatigue management. This is despite the knowledge that stroke results in changes in physical, cognitive, and emotional functioning, which all impact one's ability to return to work. The purpose of this systematic review is to conduct a comprehensive and up-to-date search of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of return-to-work programmes after stroke. The focus is especially on examining components of mood and fatigue if they were included, and to also report on the screening tools used to measure mood and fatigue.

Method

Searches were performed using 7 electronic databases for RCTs published in English from inception to 4 January 2023. A narrative synthesis of intervention design and outcomes was provided.

Results

The search yielded 5 RCTs that satisfied the selection criteria (n = 626). Three studies included components of mood and fatigue management in the intervention, of which 2 studies found a higher percentage of subjects in the intervention group returning to work compared to those in the control group. The remaining 2 studies which did not include components of mood and fatigue management did not find any significant differences in return-to-work rates between the intervention and control groups. Screening tools to assess mood or fatigue were included in 3 studies.

Conclusion

Overall, the findings demonstrated that mood and fatigue are poorly addressed in rehabilitation programmes aimed at improving return-to-work after stroke, despite being a significant predictor of return-to-work. There is limited and inconsistent use of mood and fatigue screening tools. The findings were generally able to provide guidance and recommendations in the development of a stroke rehabilitation programme for return-to-work, highlighting the need to include components addressing and measuring psychological support and fatigue management.