Differentiating hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on CT texture analysis

Dual-energy CT improves differentiation of non-hypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from CA 19-9-negative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of dual-energy CT (DECT) in differentiating non-hypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) with negative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 26 and 39 patients with pathologically confirmed non-hypervascular PNENs and CA 19-9-negative PDACs, respectively, who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT before treatment between June 2019 and December 2021. The clinical, conventional CT qualitative, conventional CT quantitative, and DECT quantitative parameters of the two groups were compared using univariate analysis and selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to build qualitative, conventional CT quantitative, DECT quantitative, and comprehensive models. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of the models were compared using DeLong's test.

RESULTS

The AUCs of the DECT quantitative (based on normalized iodine concentrations [nICs] in the arterial and portal venous phases: 0.918; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.852-0.985) and comprehensive (based on tumour location and nICs in the arterial and portal venous phases: 0.966; 95% CI 0.889-0.995) models were higher than those of the qualitative (based on tumour location: 0.782; 95% CI 0.665-0.899) and conventional CT quantitative (based on normalized conventional CT attenuation in the arterial phase: 0.665; 95% CI 0.533-0.797; all P < 0.05) models. The DECT quantitative and comprehensive models had comparable performances (P = 0.076).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher nICs in the arterial and portal venous phases were associated with higher blood supply improving the identification of non-hypervascular PNENs.

A Machine Learning Approach Using [18F]FDG PET-Based Radiomics for Prediction of Tumor Grade and Prognosis in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

PURPOSE

We sought to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting tumor grade and prognosis using 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-based radiomics and clinical features in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

PROCEDURES

A total of 58 patients with PNETs who underwent pretherapeutic [18F]FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively enrolled. PET-based radiomics extracted from segmented tumor and clinical features were selected to develop prediction models by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator feature selection method. The predictive performances of ML models using neural network (NN) and random forest algorithms were compared by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and validated by stratified five-fold cross validation.

RESULTS

We developed two separate ML models for predicting high-grade tumors (Grade 3) and tumors with poor prognosis (disease progression within two years). The integrated models consisting of clinical and radiomic features with NN algorithm showed the best performances than the other models (stand-alone clinical or radiomics models). The performance metrics of the integrated model by NN algorithm were AUROC of 0.864 in the tumor grade prediction model and AUROC of 0.830 in the prognosis prediction model. In addition, AUROC of the integrated clinico-radiomics model with NN was significantly higher than that of tumor maximum standardized uptake model in predicting prognosis (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of clinical features and [18F]FDG PET-based radiomics using ML algorithms improved the prediction of high-grade PNET and poor prognosis in a non-invasive manner.

A primer on artificial intelligence in pancreatic imaging

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is set to transform medical imaging by leveraging the vast data contained in medical images. Deep learning and radiomics are the two main AI methods currently being applied within radiology. Deep learning uses a layered set of self-correcting algorithms to develop a mathematical model that best fits the data. Radiomics converts imaging data into mineable features such as signal intensity, shape, texture, and higher-order features. Both methods have the potential to improve disease detection, characterization, and prognostication. This article reviews the current status of artificial intelligence in pancreatic imaging and critically appraises the quality of existing evidence using the radiomics quality score.

Research advances and treatment perspectives of pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma

BACKGROUND

As a malignant tumor, pancreatic cancer has an extremely low overall 5-year survival rate. Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC), a rare pancreatic malignancy, owns clinical presentation similar to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is the most prevalent pancreatic cancer subtype. PASC is generally defined as a pancreatic tumor consisting mainly of adenocarcinoma tissue and squamous carcinoma tissue. Compared with PDAC, PASC has a higher metastatic potential and worse prognosis, and lacks of effective treatment options to date. However, the pathogenesis and treatment of PASC are not yet clear and are accompanied with difficulties.

CONCLUSION

The present paper systematically summarizes the possible pathogenesis, diagnosis methods, and further suggests potential new treatment directions through reviewing research results of PASC, including the clinical manifestations, pathological manifestation, the original hypothesis of squamous carcinoma and the potential regulatory mechanism. In short, the present paper provides a systematic review of the research progress and new ideas for the development mechanism and treatment of PASC.

GEP-NET radiomics: a systematic review and radiomics quality score assessment

OBJECTIVE

The number of radiomics studies in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) is rapidly increasing. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the available evidence of radiomics for clinical outcome measures in GEP-NETs, to understand which applications hold the most promise and which areas lack evidence.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Wiley/Cochrane Library databases were searched and a forward and backward reference check of the identified studies was executed. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with GEP-NETs and (2) radiomics analysis on CT, MRI or PET. Two reviewers independently agreed on eligibility and assessed methodological quality with the radiomics quality score (RQS) and extracted outcome data.

RESULTS

In total, 1364 unique studies were identified and 45 were included for analysis. Most studies focused on GEP-NET grade and differential diagnosis of GEP-NETs from other neoplasms, while only a minority analysed treatment response or long-term outcomes. Several studies were able to predict tumour grade or to differentiate GEP-NETs from other lesions with a good performance (AUCs 0.74-0.96 and AUCs 0.80-0.99, respectively). Only one study developed a model to predict recurrence in pancreas NETs (AUC 0.77). The included studies reached a mean RQS of 18%.

CONCLUSION

Although radiomics for GEP-NETs is still a relatively new area, some promising models have been developed. Future research should focus on developing robust models for clinically relevant aims such as prediction of response or long-term outcome in GEP-NET, since evidence for these aims is still scarce.

KEY POINTS

• The majority of radiomics studies in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours is of low quality. • Most evidence for radiomics is available for the identification of tumour grade or differentiation of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours from other neoplasms. • Radiomics for the prediction of response or long-term outcome in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours warrants further research.

Application of Unenhanced Computed Tomography Texture Analysis to Differentiate Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the application of unenhanced computed tomography (CT) texture analysis in differentiating pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Preoperative CT images of 112 patients (31 with PASC, 81 with PDAC) were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 396 texture parameters were extracted from AnalysisKit software for further texture analysis. Texture features were selected for the differentiation of PASC and PDAC by the Mann-Whitney U test, univariate logistic regression analysis, and the minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the texture feature-based model by the random forest (RF) method. Finally, the robustness and reproducibility of the predictive model were assessed by the 10-times leave-group-out cross-validation (LGOCV) method.

RESULTS

In the present study, 10 texture features to differentiate PASC from PDAC were eventually retained for RF model construction after feature selection. The predictive model had a good classification performance in differentiating PASC from PDAC, with the following characteristics: sensitivity, 95.7%; specificity, 92.5%; accuracy, 94.3%; positive predictive value (PPV), 94.3%; negative predictive value (NPV), 94.3%; and area under the ROC curve (AUC), 0.98. Moreover, the predictive model was proved to be robust and reproducible using the 10-times LGOCV algorithm (sensitivity, 90.0%; specificity, 71.3%; accuracy, 76.8%; PPV, 59.0%; NPV, 95.2%; and AUC, 0.80).

CONCLUSION

The unenhanced CT texture analysis has great potential for differentiating PASC from PDAC.

Radiomics in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: methodological issues and clinical significance

PURPOSE

To present the state-of-art of radiomics in the context of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), with a focus on the methodological and technical approaches used, to support the search of guidelines for optimal applications. Furthermore, an up-to-date overview of the current clinical applications of radiomics in the field of PanNETs is provided.

METHODS

Original articles were searched on PubMed and Science Direct with specific keywords. Evaluations of the selected studies have been focused mainly on (i) the general radiomic workflow and the assessment of radiomic features robustness/reproducibility, as well as on the major clinical applications and investigations accomplished so far with radiomics in the field of PanNETs: (ii) grade prediction, (iii) differential diagnosis from other neoplasms, (iv) assessment of tumor behavior and aggressiveness, and (v) treatment response prediction.

RESULTS

Thirty-one articles involving PanNETs radiomic-related objectives were selected. In regard to the grade differentiation task, yielded AUCs are currently in the range of 0.7-0.9. For differential diagnosis, the majority of studies are still focused on the preliminary identification of discriminative radiomic features. Limited information is known on the prediction of tumors aggressiveness and of treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics is recently expanding in the setting of PanNETs. From the analysis of the published data, it is emerging how, prior to clinical application, further validations are necessary and methodological implementations require optimization. Nevertheless, this new discipline might have the potential in assisting the current urgent need of improving the management strategies in PanNETs patients.

Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Signature for the Preoperative Differentiation of Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma From Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Purpose

The purpose was to assess the predictive ability of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics signature in differential diagnosis between pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Materials and Methods

Eighty-one patients (63.6 ± 8.8 years old) with PDAC and 31 patients (64.7 ± 11.1 years old) with PASC who underwent preoperative CE-CT were included. A total of 792 radiomics features were extracted from the late arterial phase (n = 396) and portal venous phase (n = 396) for each case. Significantly different features were selected using Mann-Whitney U test, univariate logistic regression analysis, and minimum redundancy and maximum relevance method. A radiomics signature was constructed using random forest method, the robustness and the reliability of which was validated using 10-times leave group out cross-validation (LGOCV) method.

Results

Seven radiomics features from late arterial phase images and three from portal venous phase images were finally selected. The radiomics signature performed well in differential diagnosis between PASC and PDAC, with 94.5% accuracy, 98.3% sensitivity, 90.1% specificity, 91.9% positive predictive value (PPV), and 97.8% negative predictive value (NPV). Moreover, the radiomics signature was proved to be robust and reliable using the LGOCV method, with 76.4% accuracy, 91.1% sensitivity, 70.8% specificity, 56.7% PPV, and 96.2% NPV.

Conclusion

CT-based radiomics signature may serve as a promising non-invasive method in differential diagnosis between PASC and PDAC.