1
|
Wang Y, Xu J, Yin X, Fang Y, Li K. The comparision among euploidy of preimplantation blastocysts in different controlled ovary stimulation (COH) protocols. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024:10.1007/s00404-024-07474-6. [PMID: 38713294 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07474-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare differences in euploidy rates for blastocysts in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long and short protocols, GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol, progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and mild stimulation protocols, and other ovary stimulation protocols. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study from the Assisted Reproductive Medicine Department of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. A total of 1657 PGT-A cycles with intracytoplasmic sperm injection after different controlled ovary hyperstimulation protocols were analyzed, and a total of 3154 embryos were biopsied. Differences in euploidy rate per embryo biopsied, embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved and cycle cancellation rate were compared. RESULTS For the PGT-A cycles, the euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was lower in the GnRH-ant protocol than in the GnRH-a long protocol (53.26 vs. 58.68%, respectively). Multiple linear regression showed that the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied (β = -0.079, p = 0.011). The euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was not affected by total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved. The embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved was similar in all protocols and was negatively correlated with the total number of oocytes retrieved (β = -0.003, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION Compared with the GnRH-a long protocol, the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied. The total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved did not appear to significantly influence euploidy rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Wang
- School of Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji University, #2699, Gaoke West Road, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Junting Xu
- School of Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji University, #2699, Gaoke West Road, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Xiangjie Yin
- School of Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji University, #2699, Gaoke West Road, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Yuan Fang
- School of Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji University, #2699, Gaoke West Road, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Kunming Li
- School of Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji University, #2699, Gaoke West Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hua Z, Zhang W, Han L, Zhang Y, Jiang X, Ding C. Kaempferol exerts antioxidant effects in age-related diminished ovarian reserve by regulating the HSP90/NRF2 pathway. Chem Biol Drug Des 2024; 103:e14385. [PMID: 37914430 DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.14385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
Kaempferol is the active ingredient of Er-Xian decoction (EXD), a traditional Chinese medicine formula used clinically to treat ovarian dysfunction, but the mechanism of kaempferol relieving age-related diminished ovarian reserve (AR-DOR) is still unclear. In this study, 36 volunteers and 78 DOR patients (37 patients with EXD treatment) were enrolled in the clinical research. Meanwhile, 32-week-old female mice were used to establish the AR-DOR model, and these model mice were intragastrically administered with 100 mg/kg kaempferol in the presence or absence of 200 mg/kg geranylgeranylacetone (GGA) or 1 mg/kg geldanamycin (GDA). The effects of kaempferol on serum hormone levels and oxidative stress-related indexes were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Antral follicle count (AFC) was determined by hematoxylin-eosin staining. The protein levels of HSP90 and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) were assayed by Western blot. This study displayed that the serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level in DOR patients with EXD treatment was higher than that in DOR patients without EXD treatment. Kaempferol treatment reversed the low levels of AMH, estradiol (E2), AFC, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT), as well as the high levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and malonaldehyde (MDA). The results showed that HSP90 was predicted to have high affinity with kaempferol, and its expression was inhibited by kaempferol, while the expression of NRF2, the target of HSP90, was up-regulated by kaempferol. However, the above effects of kaempferol were reversed by GGA. On the contrary, GDA enhanced the therapeutic effects of kaempferol on AR-DOR mice. Moreover, the treatment of kaempferol resulted in a reduction in the phosphorylation level of heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), the transcription factor associated with HSP90, and an increase in the phosphorylation level of Src, a client protein of HSP90. In summary, kaempferol exerts an antioxidant effect on AR-DOR by inhibiting HSP90 expression to up-regulate NRF2 expression. This study provides a theoretical basis for the clinical application of kaempferol in AR-DOR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhoujia Hua
- Department of Reproduction, Zhejiang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Reproduction, Zhejiang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lin Han
- Department of Reproduction, Zhejiang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuwei Zhang
- Second Clinical Medical School, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xuejuan Jiang
- Department of Reproduction, Zhejiang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Caifei Ding
- Department of Reproduction, Zhejiang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duan X, Li Z, Li M, Ma X. Analysis of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols in women over 35 years old with poor ovarian response: a real-world study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:813. [PMID: 37996795 PMCID: PMC10666416 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06112-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the optimal controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol for patients aged 35 and above with poor ovarian response (POR), utilizing real-world data. This retrospective cohort study examined clinical information from a total of 4256 patients between January 2017 and November 2022. The patients were categorized into three groups: modified GnRH agonist protocol (2116 patients), GnRH antagonist protocol (1628 patients), and Mild stimulation protocol (512 patients). Comparative analysis was conducted on clinical variables and pregnancy outcomes across the three groups. The GnRH agonist protocol was associated with a higher number of oocyte number (4.02 ± 2.25 vs. 3.15 ± 1.52 vs. 2.40 ± 1.26, p < 0.001), higher number of transferable embryos (1.73 ± 1.02 vs. 1.35 ± 1.22 vs. 1.10 ± 0.86, p = 0.016), higher cumulative live birth rate 28.50(603/2116) vs. 24.94(406/1628) vs. 20.51(105/512), p < 0.001) than GnRH antagonist protocol and Mild stimulation protocol, the Mild stimulation protocol was associated with a higher miscarriage rates 16.27(62/381) vs. 16.61(48/289) vs. 32.22(29/90), p = 0.001) than the other two groups. Therefore, it can be concluded that all three protocols can be used in patients over 35 years old with poor ovarian response. However, if patients require more frozen-thawed embryo transfers to achieve better cumulative live birth rates, the modified GnRH agonist protocol may be the preferable option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyan Duan
- Department of Gynaecology and obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu, 292 Kaixuan South Road, Henan, Shangqiu, People's Republic of China.
| | - Zhan Li
- Department of Gynaecology and obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu, 292 Kaixuan South Road, Henan, Shangqiu, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingming Li
- Graduate School of Zhengzhou University, Henan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xing Ma
- Graduate School of Zhengzhou University, Henan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bülow NS, Warzecha AK, Nielsen MV, Andersen CY, Holt MD, Petersen MR, Sopa N, Zedeler A, Englund AL, Pinborg A, Grøndahl ML, Skouby SO, Macklon NS. Impact of letrozole co-treatment during ovarian stimulation on oocyte yield, embryo development, and live birth rate in women with normal ovarian reserve: secondary outcomes from the RIOT trial. Hum Reprod 2023; 38:2154-2165. [PMID: 37699851 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does letrozole (LZ) co-treatment during ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins for in IVF impact follicle recruitment, oocyte number and quality, embryo quality, or live birth rate (LBR)? SUMMARY ANSWER No impact of LZ was found in follicle recruitment, number of oocytes, quality of embryos, or LBR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Multi-follicle stimulation for IVF produces supra-physiological oestradiol levels. LZ is an aromatase inhibitor that lowers serum oestradiol thus reducing negative feedback and increasing the endogenous gonadotropins in both the follicular and the luteal phases, effectively normalizing the endocrine milieu during IVF treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Secondary outcomes from a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial (RCT) investigating once-daily 5 mg LZ or placebo during stimulation for IVF with FSH. The RCT was conducted at four fertility clinics at University Hospitals in Denmark from August 2016 to November 2018 and pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) registered until May 2023. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS One hundred fifty-nine women with expected normal ovarian reserve (anti-Müllerian hormone 8-32 nmol/l) were randomized to either co-treatment with LZ (n = 80) or placebo (n = 79). In total 1268 oocytes were aspirated developing into 386 embryos, and morphology and morphokinetics were assessed. One hundred twenty-nine embryos were transferred in the fresh cycle and 158 embryos in a subsequent FET cycle. The effect of LZ on cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), LBR, endometrial thickness in the fresh cycle, and total FSH consumption was reported. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The proportion of usable embryos of retrieved oocytes was similar in the LZ group and the placebo group with 0.31 vs 0.36 (mean difference (MD) -0.05, 95% CI (-0.12; 0.03), P = 0.65). The size and number of aspirated follicles at oocyte retrieval were similar with 11.8 vs 10.3 follicles per patient (MD 1.5, 95% CI (-0.5; 3.1), P = 0.50), as well as the number of retrieved oocytes with 8.0 vs 7.9 oocytes (MD 0.1, 95% CI (-1.4; 1.6), P = 0.39) in the LZ and placebo groups, respectively. The chance of retrieving an oocyte from the 13 to 16 mm follicles at trigger day was 66% higher (95% CI (24%; 108%), P = 0.002) in the placebo group than in the LZ group, whilst the chance of retrieving an oocyte from the ≥17 mm follicles at trigger day was 50% higher (95% CI (2%; 98%), P = 0.04) in the LZ group than in the placebo group. The proportion of fertilized oocytes with two-pronuclei per retrieved oocytes or per metaphase II oocytes (MII) (the 2PN rates) were similar regardless of fertilization with IVF or ICSI with 0.48 vs 0.57 (MD -0.09, 95% CI (-0.24; 0.04), P = 0.51), and 0.62 vs 0.64 (MD -0.02, 95% CI (-0.13; 0.07), P = 0.78) in the LZ and placebo groups, respectively. However, the MII rate in the ICSI group was significantly lower with 0.75 vs 0.88 in the LZ vs the placebo group (MD -0.14, 95% CI (-0.22; -0.06), P = 0.03). Blastocysts on Day 5 per patient were similar with 1.5 vs 2.0, P = 0.52, as well as vitrified blastocysts per patient Day 5 with 0.8 vs 1.2 in (MD -0.4, 95% CI (-1.0; 0.2), P = 0.52) and vitrified blastocysts per patient Day 6 with 0.6 vs 0.6 (MD 0, 95% CI (-0.3; 0.3), P = 1.00) in the LZ vs placebo group, respectively. Morphologic evaluation of all usable embryos showed a similar distribution in 'Good', 'Fair', and 'Poor', in the LZ vs placebo group, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.8 95% CI (0.5; 1.3), P = 0.68 of developing a better class embryo. Two hundred and ninety-five of the 386 embryos were cultured in an embryoscope. Morphokinetic annotations showed that the odds of having a high KIDscore™ D3 Day 3 were 1.2 times higher (CI (0.8; 1.9), P = 0.68) in the LZ group vs the placebo group. The CPR per transfer was comparable with 31% vs 39% (risk-difference of 8%, 95% CI (-25%; 11%), P = 0.65) in the LZ and placebo group, respectively, as well as CPR per transfer adjusted for day of transfer, oestradiol and progesterone levels at trigger, progesterone levels mid-luteal, and number of oocytes retrieved (adjusted OR) of 0.8 (95% CI (0.4; 1.6), P = 0.72). Comparable LBR were found per transfer 28% vs 37% (MD -9%, 95% CI (-26%; 9%), P = 0.60) and per randomized women 24% vs 30% (MD of -6%, CI (-22%; 8%), P = 0.60) in the LZ group and placebo group, respectively. Furthermore, 4.8 years since the last oocyte aspiration, a total of 287 of 386 embryos have been transferred in the fresh or a subsequently FET cycle, disclosing the cumulative CPR, which is similar with 38% vs 34% (MD 95% CI (8%; 16%), P = 0.70) in the LZ vs placebo group. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Both cleavage stage and blastocyst transfer and vitrification were permitted in the protocol, making it necessary to categorize their quality and pool the results. The study was powered to detect hormonal variation but not embryo or pregnancy outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The similar utilization rate and quality of the embryos support the use of LZ co-treatment for IVF with specific indication as fertility preservation, patients with previous cancer, or poor responders. The effect of LZ on mature oocytes from different follicle sizes and LBRs should be evaluated in a meta-analysis or a larger RCT. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Funding was received from EU Interreg for ReproUnion, Sjaelland University Hospital, Denmark, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, and Gedeon Ricther. Roche Diagnostics contributed with assays. A.P. has received grants from Ferring, Merck Serono, and Gedeon Richter, consulting fees from Preglem, Novo Nordisk, Ferring, Gedeon Richter, Cryos, & Merck A/S, speakers fees from Gedeon Richter, Ferring, Merck A/S, Theramex, & Organon, and travel support from Gedeon Richter. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests in the research or publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS NCT02939898 and NCT02946684.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Søderhamn Bülow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Endocrinological and Reproductive Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Fertility Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Agnieszka Katarzyna Warzecha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Endocrinological and Reproductive Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Villads Nielsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Endocrinological and Reproductive Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus Yding Andersen
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marianne Dreyer Holt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Fertility Department, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Køge, Denmark
| | - Morten Rønn Petersen
- The Fertility Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Negjyp Sopa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Anne Zedeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Anne Lis Englund
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Fertility Department, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Køge, Denmark
| | - Anja Pinborg
- The Fertility Department, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Marie Louise Grøndahl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Endocrinological and Reproductive Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sven Olaf Skouby
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Endocrinological and Reproductive Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nicholas Stephen Macklon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Fertility Department, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Køge, Denmark
- London Women's Clinic, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xie Y, Shi W, Tan Y, Yao M, Qing M, Luo X, Zhang W. Acupuncture and moxibustion for diminished ovarian reserve: A scoping review. Complement Ther Med 2023; 77:102973. [PMID: 37598724 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) refers to the decreased number and quality of oocytes in the ovary. Acupuncture and moxibustion has a certain effect on DOR; however, the number of studies and reports of research evidence are limited. This study aimed to conduct a scoping review of the clinical research status of acupuncture and moxibustion for treating patients with DOR. METHOD PubMed, Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica database, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biological Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, and Wanfang database were searched from January 2010 to May 2022 using keywords and medical subject heading terms. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevant studies were selected. Structured tables and descriptive charts were made to visually express research features by using Excel, Original, IBM SPSS Model 18.0, Adobe Illustrator and other software packages. Report quality was evaluated for Cochrane bias using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS Overall, 851 studies were identified; of these, 90 met the inclusion criteria. The results extracted from these studies were classified into four categories: research characteristics, study type, acupuncture and moxibustion prescriptions, and efficacy observation. CONCLUSIONS The quality assessment of acupuncture and moxibustion for DOR is not ideal. Therefore, standardisation and normalisation should be strengthened, and high-quality evidence is needed to further demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. Due to heterogeneity in DOR diagnosis, the observation index should be updated with reference to the latest research to improve efficacy evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuyou Xie
- Department of Acupuncture and Massage Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410007, China
| | - Wenying Shi
- Department of Acupuncture and Massage Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410007, China
| | - Yan Tan
- Department of Acupuncture and Massage Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410007, China
| | - Mulin Yao
- Department of Acupuncture and Massage Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410007, China
| | - Meiwang Qing
- Stroke Biological Recovery Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, The Teaching Affiliate of Harvard Medical School, 300 First Avenue, Boston, MA 02129, United States of America
| | - Xun Luo
- School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, 1066 Xueyuan Avenue, Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province 518060, China.
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Acupuncture and Massage Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410007, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhu J, Xing W, Li T, Lin H, Ou J. GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH Agonist Long Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Clinical Outcomes and Maternal-Neonatal Safety. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:875779. [PMID: 35846307 PMCID: PMC9276929 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.875779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical outcomes and maternal-neonatal safety of gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocols. METHODS A total of 2505 women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into GnRH-ant group (n = 1514) and GnRH-a group (n = 991) according their stimulation protocol. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used for balancing the baseline of two groups. The pregnancy outcomes were analyzed in fresh transfer cycles, and the obstetric and perinatal outcomes were calculated in singleton live births of fresh cycles. The primary outcome was the live birth rate. The secondary outcome measures were maternal complications, preterm birth rate, low birthweight rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and moderate-severe OHSS rate. RESULTS After 1:1 PSM, baseline characteristics of the GnRH-ant group and GnRH-a group were matched and assigned 991 cycles in each group. Before PSM, there were 700 fresh cycles including 237 singleton live births in the GnRH-ant group and 588 fresh cycles including 187 singleton live births in the GnRH-a group. After PSM, there were 471 fresh cycles including 166 singleton live births in the GnRH-ant group and 588 fresh cycles including 187 singleton live births in the GnRH-a group. No significant differences were observed in the live birth rate (44.6% vs 48.8%), maternal complications, preterm birth rate (9.0% vs 6.4%), and low birthweight rate (17.5% vs 24.1%) between two groups after PSM (P > 0.05). The moderate-severe OHSS rate (2.9% vs 6.0%, P = 0.002) and multiple pregnancy rate (24.5% vs 33.1%, P = 0.025) was significantly lower in the GnRH-ant group than that in the GnRH-a group after PSM. CONCLUSION GnRH-ant protocol was comparable with GnRH-a protocol in clinical outcomes, obstetric and perinatal outcomes, and with a lower risk of OHSS. For those who want to get an effective and safe outcome, and a shorter treatment period, GnRH-ant is a suitable choice.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lv M, Yu J, Chen P, Xiao Q, Lou L, Luo Y, Yuan M, Xu Y, Feng Y, Bai M, Zhang Z, Li L. Ovarian stimulation in IVF couples with severe male factor infertility: GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1037220. [PMID: 36277710 PMCID: PMC9585245 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1037220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the efficacy of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol and the long GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) protocol during in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy in patients with severe male infertile factors. METHODS A total of 983 women with severe male factor infertility undergoing IVF therapy from 2017 to 2020 at one center were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the GnRH-ant group (n=527) and the GnRH-a group (n=456) according to their ovarian stimulation protocols. Patient baseline characteristics, ovarian stimulation characteristics, and clinical pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups. The live birth rate was considered the main pregnancy outcome. RESULTS GnRH-a group had a higher live birth rate compared with the GnRH-ant group (41.0% versus 31.3%, p=0.002). Moreover, the implantation (32.8% vs. 28.1%, p=0.033), biochemical pregnancy (52.4% versus 44.8%, p=0.017), clinical pregnancy (49.3% versus 39.7%, p=0.002) and ongoing pregnancy rates (43.2% vs. 34.9%, p=0.008) were higher in GnRH-a group. For patients with one embryo transferred, the GnRH-a group demonstrated higher live birth (37.0% vs. 19.4%, p=0.010) and ongoing pregnancy rate (38.9% vs. 24.5%, p=0.046) than the GnRH-ant group. Among patients with two embryos transferred, the live birth rate was also higher in the GnRH-a group than in the GnRH-ant group, with no statistical difference. No significant differences were observed in the biochemical abortion rate, clinical miscarriage rate, early miscarriage rate, late miscarriage rate, heterotopic pregnancy rate, twin pregnancy rate, and birth sex ratio between the two groups. CONCLUSION For individuals with severe male infertility undergoing IVF, the GnRH-a protocol is considered a more efficient and feasible strategy with a higher live birth rate compared to the GnRH-ant protocol, especially in single embryo transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mu Lv
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Juanjuan Yu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Peiqin Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital of China Welfare Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qimeng Xiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Liqun Lou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yifan Luo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Mu Yuan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Xuzhou, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yuan Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Youji Feng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Mingzhu Bai
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Xuzhou, Xuzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Mingzhu Bai, ; Zhenbo Zhang, ; Linxia Li,
| | - Zhenbo Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Mingzhu Bai, ; Zhenbo Zhang, ; Linxia Li,
| | - Linxia Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Mingzhu Bai, ; Zhenbo Zhang, ; Linxia Li,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bülow NS, Holt MD, Skouby SO, Petersen KB, Englund ALM, Pinborg A, Macklon NS. Co-treatment with letrozole during ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 44:717-736. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
9
|
Montoya-Botero P, Drakopoulos P, González-Foruria I, Polyzos NP. Fresh and cumulative live birth rates in mild versus conventional stimulation for IVF cycles in poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Open 2021; 2021:hoaa066. [PMID: 33614987 PMCID: PMC7882043 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Are cumulative and live birth rates (LBRs) comparable in poor ovarian response women treated with different protocols of mild stimulation IVF (i.e. oral compounds, lower doses or shorter treatments) versus conventional IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER Mild ovarian stimulation (MOS) results in comparable outcomes to those of conventional stimulation in poor ovarian response patients with low ovarian reserve. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Several randomized trials and meta-analyses have been published evaluating the role of mild (MOS) versus conventional ovarian stimulation in poor ovarian response patients. Most report a potentially higher safety profile, patient satisfaction and lower costs, suggesting that the higher cycle cancellation rate and fewer oocytes retrieved following MOS does not affect the final reproductive outcome. Additionally, over the last few years, new publications have added data regarding MOS, and shown the possible benefit of a higher oocyte yield which may also improve prognosis in patients with poor ovarian response. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION We conducted a systematic search of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS-BIREME, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, CENTRAL (Cochrane Register), Web of Science, Scopus, Trip Database and Open Grey, to identify all relevant studies published up to March 2020. We examined trial registries for ongoing trials. No publication-year or language restrictions were adopted. We explored the reference list of all included studies, reviews and abstracts of major scientific meetings. The primary outcomes were cumulative and fresh LBR (CLBR and FLBR) per woman randomized. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS We included subfertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI characterized as poor responders and compared primary and secondary outcomes between the different protocols of mild stimulation IVF (i.e. oral compounds, lower doses or shorter treatments) and conventional IVF. We used the PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) model to select our study population. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Overall, 15 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. CLBR and FLBR were comparable between mild versus conventional stimulation (RR 1.15; 95% CI: 0.73 - 1.81; I2 = 0%, n = 424, moderate certainty and RR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.97 - 1.04; I 2 = 0%, n = 1001, low certainty, respectively). No difference was observed either when utilizing oral compounds (i.e. letrozole and clomiphene) or lower doses. Similarly, ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) were equivalent when comparing the two groups (RR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.98 - 1.05; I 2 = 0%, n = 1480, low certainty, and RR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.97 - 1.03; I2 = 0%, n = 2355, low certainty, respectively). A significantly lower oocyte yield (mean differences (MD) -0.80; 95% CI: -1.28, -0.32; I2 = 83%, n = 2516, very low certainty) and higher rate of cycle cancellation (RR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.08 - 2.02; I2 = 62%, n = 2588, low certainty) was observed in the MOS group. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The overall quality of the included studies was low to moderate. Even though strict inclusion criteria were used, the selected studies were heterogeneous in population characteristics and treatment protocols. We found no differences in CLBR between MOS and COS (95% CI: 0.73 - 1.81.). WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS MOS could be considered as a treatment option in low prognosis poor responder patients, given that it results in similar fresh and CLBRs compared with COS. A milder approach is associated with a lower number of oocytes retrieved and a higher cancellation rate, although treatment cost is significantly reduced. Future research should focus on which type of ovarian stimulation may be of benefit in better prognosis women. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS There were no sources of financial support. N.P.P. received research grants, honoraria for lectures from: Merck Serono, MSD, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Besins International, Roche Diagnostics, IBSA, Theramex and Gedeon Richter. P.D. received unrestricted grants and honoraria from Merck Serono, MSD and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. I.G.F. received unrestricted grants and honoraria from Merck Serono, MSD, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gedeon-Richter and IBSA. P.M.B. reported no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020167260.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Montoya-Botero
- Conceptum-Unidad de Fertilidad del Country, Bogotá 110221, Colombia.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus Mujer, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | - Panagiotis Drakopoulos
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Surgical and Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Iñaki González-Foruria
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus Mujer, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona 08028, Spain
| | - Nikolaos P Polyzos
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus Mujer, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona 08028, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tu X, You B, Jing M, Lin C, Zhang R. Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Versus Mild Stimulation Protocol in Advanced Age Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing Their First In Vitro Fertilization Cycle: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:801026. [PMID: 35140685 PMCID: PMC8818948 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.801026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess and compare the feasibility of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with mild stimulation protocol for advanced age women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle. METHODS Patients aged ≥35 years and DOR undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study: 139 and 600 patients underwent the PPOS and mild stimulation protocols, respectively. The primary outcomes were cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CCPR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved and top-quality embryos. RESULTS There was nearly no significant difference of baseline characteristics between the two groups. Although a greater amount of total gonadotropin (1906.61 ± 631.04 IU vs. 997.72 ± 705.73 IU, P<0.001) and longer duration of stimulation (9 (10-7) vs. 6 (8-4), P<0.001) were observed in the PPOS group, the number of retrieved oocytes (3 (6-2) vs. 2 (4-1), P<0.001) and top-quality embryos (1 (2-0) vs. 1 (2-0), P=0.038) was greater in the PPOS group than the mild stimulation group. Meanwhile, the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge rate was significantly lower in the PPOS group (0.7% vs.8.3%, P=0.001) than the mild stimulation group. However, there was no significant difference in conservative CCPR, conservative CLBR, optimistic CCPR, and optimistic CLBR between the two groups (all P>0.05). A multivariate logistic regression model showed significant positive effects of the number of retrieved oocytes and number of top-quality embryos on conservative CCPR (OR=1.236, 95%CI: 1.048-1.456, P=0.012, OR=2.313, 95%CI: 1.676-3.194, P<0.001) and conservative CLBR (OR=1.250, 95%CI: 1.036-1.508, P=0.020, OR=2.634, 95%CI: 1.799-3.857, P<0.001) respectively, while significant negative effects of age were identified for conservative CCPR (OR=0.805, 95%CI: 0.739-0.877, P<0.001) and conservative CLBR (OR=0.797, 95%CI: 0.723-0.879, P<0.001). CONCLUSION The PPOS protocol is an effective alternative to the mild stimulation protocol for advanced age patients with DOR, as it provides comparable reproductive outcomes and better control of premature LH surge. Further, more oocytes and top-quality embryos were obtained in the PPOS group, which had a positive association with conservative CCPR and CLBR.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang Y, Zhang C, Shu J, Guo J, Chang HM, Leung PCK, Sheng JZ, Huang H. Adjuvant treatment strategies in ovarian stimulation for poor responders undergoing IVF: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2020; 26:247-263. [PMID: 32045470 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 11/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite great advances in assisted reproductive technology, poor ovarian response (POR) is still considered as one of the most challenging tasks in reproductive medicine. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this systemic review is to evaluate the role of different adjuvant treatment strategies on the probability of pregnancy achievement in poor responders undergoing IVF. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 10 adjuvant treatments [testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), letrozole, recombinant LH, recombinant hCG, oestradiol, clomiphene citrate, progesterone, growth hormone (GH) and coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10)] were included. SEARCH METHODS Relevant studies published in the English language were comprehensively selected using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) until 11 July 2018. We included studies that investigated various adjuvant agents, including androgen and androgen-modulating agents, oestrogen, progesterone, clomiphene citrate, GH and CoQ10, during IVF treatment and reported subsequent pregnancy outcomes. The administration of GnRH analogs and gonadotrophins without adjuvant treatment was set as the control. We measured study quality based on the methodology and categories listed in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. This review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018086217). OUTCOMES Of the 1124 studies initially identified, 46 trials reporting on 6312 women were included in this systematic review, while 19 trials defining POR using the Bologna criteria reporting 2677 women were included in the network meta-analysis. Compared with controls, DHEA and CoQ10 treatments resulted in a significantly higher chance of clinical pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) 2.46, 95% CI 1.16 to 5.23; 2.22, 1.08-4.58, respectively]. With regard to the number of retrieved oocytes, HCG, oestradiol and GH treatments had the highest number of oocytes retrieved [weighted mean difference (WMD) 2.08, 0.72 to 3.44; 2.02, 0.23 to 3.81; 1.72, 0.98 to 2.46, compared with controls, respectively]. With regard to the number of embryos transferred, testosterone and GH treatment led to the highest number of embryos transferred (WMD 0.72, 0.11 to 1.33; 0.67, 0.43 to 0.92; compared with controls, respectively). Moreover, GH resulted in the highest oestradiol level on the HCG day (WMD 797.63, 466.45 to 1128.81, compared with controls). Clomiphene citrate, letrozole and GH groups used the lowest dosages of gonadotrophins for ovarian stimulation (WMD 1760.00, -2890.55 to -629.45; -1110.17, -1753.37 to -466.96; -875.91, -1433.29 to -282.52; compared with controls, respectively). CoQ10 led to the lowest global cancelation rate (OR 0.33, 0.15 to 0.74, compared with controls). WIDER IMPLICATIONS For patients with POR, controlled ovarian stimulation protocols using adjuvant treatment with DHEA, CoQ10 and GH showed better clinical outcomes in terms of achieving pregnancy, and a lower dosage of gonadotrophin required for ovulation induction. Furthermore, high-level RCT studies using uniform standards for POR need to be incorporated into future meta-analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zhang
- International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.,Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310014, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Chao Zhang
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, China
| | - Jing Shu
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310014, China
| | - Jing Guo
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310014, China
| | - Hsun-Ming Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Peter C K Leung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Jian-Zhong Sheng
- Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Hefeng Huang
- International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai 200030, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Datta AK, Maheshwari A, Felix N, Campbell S, Nargund G. Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2020; 27:229-253. [PMID: 33146690 PMCID: PMC7902993 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mild ovarian stimulation has emerged as an alternative to conventional IVF with the advantages of being more patient-friendly and less expensive. Inadequate data on pregnancy outcomes and concerns about the cycle cancellation rate (CCR) have prevented mild, or low-dose, IVF from gaining wide acceptance. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE To evaluate parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on IVF where comparisons were made between a mild (≤150 IU daily dose) and conventional stimulation in terms of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in patients described as poor, normal and non-polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) hyper-responders to IVF. SEARCH METHODS Searches with no language restrictions were performed using Medline, Embase, Cochrane central, Pre-Medicine from January 1990 until April 2020, using pre-specified search terms. References of included studies were hand-searched as well as advance access articles to key journals. Only parallel-group RCTs that used ≤150 IU daily dose of gonadotrophin as mild-dose IVF (MD-IVF) and compared with a higher conventional dose (CD-IVF) were included. Studies were grouped under poor, normal or hyper-responders as described by the authors in their inclusion criteria. Women with PCOS were excluded in the hyper-responder group. The risk of bias was assessed as per Cochrane Handbook for the included studies. The quality of evidence (QoE) was assessed according to the GRADE system. PRISMA guidance was followed for review methodology. OUTCOMES A total of 31 RCTs were included in the analysis: 15 in the poor, 14 in the normal and 2 in the hyper-responder group. Live birth rates (LBRs) per randomisation were similar following use of MD-IVF in poor (relative risk (RR) 0.91 (CI 0.68, 1.22)), normal (RR 0.88 (CI 0.69, 1.12)) and hyper-responders (RR 0.98 (CI 0.79, 1.22)) when compared to CD-IVF. QoE was moderate. Cumulative LBRs (5 RCTs, n = 2037) also were similar in all three patient types (RR 0.96 (CI 0.86 1.07) (moderate QoE). Risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was significantly less with MD-IVF than CD-IVF in both normal (RR 0.22 (CI 0.10, 0.50)) and hyper-responders (RR 0.47 (CI 0.31, 0.72)), with moderate QoE. The CCRs were comparable in poor (RR 1.33 (CI 0.96, 1.85)) and hyper-responders (RR 1.31 (CI 0.98, 1.77)) but increased with MD-IVF among normal responders (RR 2.08 (CI 1.38, 3.14)); all low to very low QoE. Although fewer oocytes were retrieved and fewer embryos created with MD-IVF, the proportion of high-grade embryos was similar in all three population types (low QoE). Compared to CD-IVF, MD-IVF was associated with less gonadotrophin use and lower cost. WIDER IMPLICATIONS This updated review provides reassurance on using MD-IVF not only for the LBR per cycle but also for the cumulative LBR, with moderate QoE. With risks identified with ‘freeze-all’ strategies, it may be time to recommend mild-dose ovarian stimulation for IVF for all categories of women i.e. hyper, poor and normal responders to IVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stuart Campbell
- St George's University of London, London, UK.,Create Fertility, London, UK
| | - Geeta Nargund
- Create Fertility, London, UK.,St Georges University Hospitals NHS Trust London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Treatment potential of bone marrow-derived stem cells in women with diminished ovarian reserves and premature ovarian failure. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2020; 31:156-162. [PMID: 30855290 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We review the techniques recently tested in both animal models and humans to provide a state-of-the-art on adult stem cell ovarian transplant to achieve ovarian rejuvenation in patients with diminished ovarian reserves. RECENT FINDINGS As the firsts reports of spontaneous pregnancies achieved after bone marrow transplantation in oncologic women with primary ovarian insufficiency, increasing evidence supports the regenerative effects of stem cell-based therapies in the ovarian niche. Adult stem cells from several origins promote follicular development, increase ovarian local vascularization, increase follicle and stromal cell proliferation and reduce cell apoptosis and follicular atresia, although they do not modify embryo quality. Therefore, residual quiescent follicles of aged or damaged ovaries might produce competent oocytes in an adequate ovarian environment. Nevertheless, further research is needed to properly evaluate underlying mechanisms, identify best cell sources and design less invasive infusion techniques. SUMMARY Stem cells may be a relevant therapeutic alternative for ovary regeneration and follicular development in patients with impaired ovaries, such as poor ovarian responders or women diagnosed with primary ovarian insufficiency.
Collapse
|
14
|
Datta AK, Maheshwari A, Felix N, Campbell S, Nargund G. Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41:225-238. [PMID: 32546333 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Mild ovarian stimulation is a treatment option for poor responders in IVF treatment. Our updated review evaluated mild IVF solely from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used genuine low-dose gonadotrophin (≤150 IU daily) alone or in combination with oral medications, comparing it with conventional-dose (>150 IU/ daily) IVF for poor responders. Electronic searches on MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PreMEDLINE, and hand searches from 2002 up to 31 January 2019, identified 14 RCTs, which were compiled with the above inclusion criteria. The risk of bias (ROB) and quality of evidence (QOE) were assessed as per Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analyses found no difference in live birth rate (four RCTs, n = 1057, RR 0.91, CI 0.66 to 1.25) (moderate QOE), ongoing pregnancy rate (six RCTs, n = 1782, RR 1.01, CI 0.86 to 1.20) (moderate-high QOE) and cycle cancellation rates (14 RCTs, n = 2746, RR 1.38, CI 0.99 to 1.92) (low QOE). Fewer oocytes and embryos were obtained from mild IVF; however, the number and proportion of high-grade embryos were similar. Mild IVF resulted in reduced gonadotrophin use and cost. The inference remained unchanged when smaller studies with ROB were excluded, or whether gonadotrophin alone or combination with oral medication was used. The evidence of equal efficacy from a pooled population, which was adequately powered for live birth, supported a mild IVF strategy for poor responders in preference to more expensive conventional IVF. Although clinical heterogeneity remained a limiting factor, it increased the generalizability of the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrija Kumar Datta
- CREATE Fertility, 6270 Bishops Court, Birmingham Business Park, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham B37 7YB, UK.
| | - Abha Maheshwari
- Aberdeen Fertility Centre, NHS Grampian, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZL and University of Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nirmal Felix
- CREATE Fertility, 6270 Bishops Court, Birmingham Business Park, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham B37 7YB, UK
| | - Stuart Campbell
- CREATE Fertility, 150 Cheapside, London EC2V 6ET, UK and St George's University of London, UK
| | - Geeta Nargund
- CREATE Fertility, 150 Cheapside, London EC2V 6ET, UK and St George's University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ma R, Song J, Si J, Liu Y, Li X, Cheng R, Hu Z, Xia T, Zhai J. Acupuncture for diminished ovarian reserve: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e16852. [PMID: 31441859 PMCID: PMC6716689 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The choice of treatments for diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) still remains a challenging clinical problem in reproductive medicine. Acupuncture could be beneficial for patients with DOR. This study aims to systematically investigate the efficacy and safety of the acupuncture for women with DOR. METHODS We will search electronic databases including PubMed (1946 to present), EMBASE (1974 to present), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, all years), Web of Science (1900 to present), Chinese Biomedical Literatures Database (CBM, 1978 to present), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1979 to present), WANFANG Data (from 2000 to present) to identify potentially eligible studies. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be included. Experimental interventions include traditional or contemporary acupuncture. Control interventions include no treatment, sham acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, or another active therapy. The primary outcomes include ongoing pregnancy rate and serum anti-Müllerian hormone level. A meta-analysis will be used to estimate a pooled intervention effect if possible. RESULTS The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION The findings will provide further evidence for the management of DOR. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018114385.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruihong Ma
- Reproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| | - Jiayi Song
- Reproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| | - Jinhua Si
- Library, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| | - Yan Liu
- Reproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| | - Xinyun Li
- Reproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| | - Rui Cheng
- Reproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| | - Zuxian Hu
- Reproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| | - Tian Xia
- Reproductive Center, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
| | - Jingbo Zhai
- Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|