Sentinel Lymph Node Detection by Lymphoscintigraphy in Malignant Melanoma

EANM-EORTC general recommendations for sentinel node diagnostics in melanoma

The accurate diagnosis of a sentinel node in melanoma includes a sequence of procedures from different medical specialities (nuclear medicine, surgery, oncology, and pathology). The items covered are presented in 11 sections and a reference list: (1) definition of a sentinel node, (2) clinical indications, (3) radiopharmaceuticals and activity injected, (4) dosimetry, (5) injection technique, (6) image acquisition and interpretation, (7) report and display, (8) use of dye, (9) gamma probe detection, (10) surgical techniques in sentinel node biopsy, and (11) pathological evaluation of melanoma-draining sentinel lymph nodes. If specific recommendations given cannot be based on evidence from original, scientific studies, referral is given to "general consensus" and similar expressions. The recommendations are designed to assist in the practice of referral to, performance, interpretation and reporting of all steps of the sentinel node procedure in the hope of setting state-of-the-art standards for good-quality evaluation of possible spread to the lymphatic system in intermediate-to-high risk melanoma without clinical signs of dissemination.

Imaging in cutaneous melanoma

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is a common malignancy and imaging, particularly lymphoscintigraphy (LS), positron-emission tomography with 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET), ultrasound, radiography computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging have important roles in staging and restaging, surgical guidance, surveillance and assessment of recurrent disease. This review aims to summarize the available data regarding these and other imaging modalities in CM and provide the basis for subsequent formulation of guidelines regarding the use of imaging in CM. PubMed and Medline searches were performed and reference lists from publications were also searched. The published data were reviewed and tabulated. There is level I evidence supporting the use of LS and sentinel lymph node biopsy in nodal staging for CM. There is level III evidence demonstrating the superiority of ultrasound to palpation in the assessment of lymph nodes in CM. There is level IV evidence supporting FDG-PET in American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IV and recurrent CM and that FDG-PET/CT may be superior to FDG-PET. Level IV evidence also supports the use of CT in the same group of patients and the role of CT appears to be complementary to FDG-PET. Various imaging modalities, especially LS/sentinel lymph node biopsy and FDG-PET/CT, add incremental information in the management of CM and the various modalities have complementary roles depending on the clinical situation.

Novel Imaging Techniques in Melanoma

Cutaneous melanoma is one of the most deadly malignancies. Although it accounts for approximately 4% of all cancer cases, it ac-counts for approximately 79% of skin cancer-related deaths. In the past few years, the nuclear medicine platform used in the management of melanoma has extended to biochemical and structural imaging. In clinical practice, integrated positron emission tomography/CT devices allow anatomic and metabolic characterization of meta-static disease in a single study. Similarly, more accurate localization of sentinel nodes in a 3-D space now is feasible with hybrid single photon emission CT/CT system. In translational research, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose probes have been designed to optimize the detection of melanoma tumor sites in vivo.

Elective radiotherapy provides regional control for patients with cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

In the current study, the authors assessed the efficacy of elective radiotherapy in providing regional (lymph node) control in patients with cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck who were at high risk for lymph node involvement. Toxicity was also assessed.

METHODS

From 1983 to 1998, 157 patients with Stage I or II cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck received elective regional radiotherapy after wide local excision of the primary lesion. None of the patients had received sentinel lymph node biopsy or dissection of the lymph nodes. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively and analyzed for outcome.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the current review was 68 months (range, 7-185 months). The disease recurred locally in 9 patients, in the neck lymph nodes in 15 patients, and distantly in 57 patients. The actuarial regional control rate was 89% at both 5 years and 10 years. The actuarial disease-specific survival and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 68% and 63%, respectively, at 5 years and 58% and 49%, respectively, at 10 years. Breslow thickness was a significant determinant of disease-specific survival and distant metastasis-free survival rates. At 10 years, 6% of patients had developed a symptomatic treatment-related complication. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study confirmed the efficacy and safety of elective regional radiotherapy for patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma predicted to have a high rate of lymph node involvement. Elective irradiation was a viable alternative to elective lymph node dissection. It may also serve as an alternative to sentinel lymph node biopsy, particularly for patients for whom dissection and systemic therapy are not therapeutic options.