1
|
Azimuddin A, Tzeng CWD, Prakash LR, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Newhook TE, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Snyder RA, Lee JE, Perrier ND, Katz MH, Maxwell JE. Postoperative Global Period Cost Reduction Using 3 Successive Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathways. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:451-459. [PMID: 38180055 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We hypothesized that iterative revisions of our original 2016 risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways would be associated with decreased 90-day perioperative costs. STUDY DESIGN From a single-institution retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with 3 iterations: "version 1" (V1) (October 2016 to January 2019), V2 (February 2019 to October 2020), and V3 (November 2020 to February 2022), institutional data were aggregated using revenue codes and adjusted to constant 2022-dollar value. Grand total perioperative costs (primary endpoint) were the sum of pancreatectomy, inpatient care, readmission, and 90-day global outpatient care. Proprietary hospital-based costs were converted to ratios using the mean cost of all hospital operations as the denominator. RESULTS Of 814 patients, pathway V1 included 363, V2 229, and V3 222 patients. Accordion Grade 3+ complications decreased with each iteration (V1: 28.4%, V2: 22.7%, and V3: 15.3%). Median length of stay decreased (V1: 6 days, interquartile range [IQR] 5 to 8; V2: 5 [IQR 4 to 6]; and V3: 5 [IQR 4 to 6]) without an increase in readmissions. Ninety-day global perioperative costs decreased by 32% (V1 cost ratio 12.6, V2 10.9, and V3 8.6). Reduction of the index hospitalization cost was associated with the greatest savings (-31%: 9.4, 8.3, and 6.5). Outpatient care costs decreased consistently (1.58, 1.41, and 1.04). When combining readmission and all outpatient costs, total "postdischarge" costs decreased (3.17, 2.59, and 2.13). Component costs of the index hospitalization that were associated with the greatest savings were room or board costs (-55%: 1.74, 1.14, and 0.79) and pharmacy costs (-61%: 2.20, 1.61, and 0.87; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Three iterative risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathway refinements were associated with a 32% global period cost savings, driven by reduced index hospitalization costs. This successful learning health system model could be externally validated at other institutions performing abdominal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahad Azimuddin
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
- Texas A&M School of Medicine, Houston, TX (Azimuddin)
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Laura R Prakash
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Morgan L Bruno
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Whitney L Dewhurst
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Michael P Kim
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Nancy D Perrier
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Matthew Hg Katz
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Azimuddin, Tzeng, Prakash, Bruno, Arvide, Dewhurst, Newhook, Kim, Ikoma, Snyder, Lee, Perrier, Katz, Maxwell)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boyev A, Arvide EM, Newhook TE, Prakash LR, Bruno ML, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Maxwell JE, Ikoma N, Snyder RA, Lee JE, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Prophylactic Antibiotic Duration and Infectious Complications in Pancreatoduodenectomy Patients With Biliary Stents: Opportunity for De-escalation. Ann Surg 2024; 279:657-664. [PMID: 37389897 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare infectious complications in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) patients with biliary stents treated with short, medium, or long durations of prophylactic antibiotics. BACKGROUND Pre-existing biliary stents have historically been associated with higher infection risk after PD. Patients are administered prophylactic antibiotics, but the optimal duration remains unknown. METHODS This single-institution retrospective cohort study included consecutive PD patients from October 2016 to April 2022. Antibiotics were continued past the operative dose per surgeon discretion. Infection rates were compared by short (≤24 h), medium (>24 but ≤96 h), and long (>96 h) duration antibiotics. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations with a primary composite outcome of wound infection, organ-space infection, sepsis, or cholangitis. RESULTS Among 542 PD patients, 310 patients (57%) had biliary stents. The composite outcome occurred in 28% (34/122) short, 25% (27/108) medium, and 29% (23/80) long-duration ( P =0.824) antibiotic patients. There were no differences in other infection rates or mortality. On multivariable analysis, antibiotic duration was not associated with infection rate. Only postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio 33.1, P <0.001) and male sex (odds ratio 1.9, P =0.028) were associated with the composite outcome. CONCLUSIONS Among 310 PD patients with biliary stents, long-duration prophylactic antibiotics were associated with similar composite infection rates to short and medium durations but were used almost twice as often in high-risk patients. These findings may represent an opportunity to de-escalate antibiotic coverage and promote risk-stratified antibiotic stewardship in stented patients by aligning antibiotic duration with risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferens FG, Taber CC, Stuart S, Hubert M, Tarade D, Lee JE, Ohh M. Deficiency in PHD2-mediated hydroxylation of HIF2α underlies Pacak-Zhuang syndrome. Commun Biol 2024; 7:240. [PMID: 38418569 PMCID: PMC10902354 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-05904-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Pacak-Zhuang syndrome is caused by mutations in the EPAS1 gene, which encodes for one of the three hypoxia-inducible factor alpha (HIFα) paralogs HIF2α and is associated with defined but varied phenotypic presentations including neuroendocrine tumors and polycythemia. However, the mechanisms underlying the complex genotype-phenotype correlations remain incompletely understood. Here, we devised a quantitative method for determining the dissociation constant (Kd) of the HIF2α peptides containing disease-associated mutations and the catalytic domain of prolyl-hydroxylase (PHD2) using microscale thermophoresis (MST) and showed that neuroendocrine-associated Class 1 HIF2α mutants have distinctly higher Kd than the exclusively polycythemia-associated Class 2 HIF2α mutants. Based on the co-crystal structure of PHD2/HIF2α peptide complex at 1.8 Å resolution, we showed that the Class 1 mutated residues are localized to the critical interface between HIF2α and PHD2, adjacent to the PHD2 active catalytic site, while Class 2 mutated residues are localized to the more flexible region of HIF2α that makes less contact with PHD2. Concordantly, Class 1 mutations were found to significantly increase HIF2α-mediated transcriptional activation in cellulo compared to Class 2 counterparts. These results reveal a structural mechanism in which the strength of the interaction between HIF2α and PHD2 is at the root of the general genotype-phenotype correlations observed in Pacak-Zhuang syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fraser G Ferens
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 661 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada
| | - Cassandra C Taber
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Sarah Stuart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 661 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada
| | - Mia Hubert
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Daniel Tarade
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Michael Ohh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 661 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clemente-Gutierrez U, Pieterman CRC, Lui MS, Yamashita TS, Tame-Elorduy A, Huang BL, Shirali AS, Erstad DJ, Lee JE, Fisher SB, Graham PH, Grubbs EG, Waguespack SG, Ng CS, Perrier N. Beyond the three P's: adrenal involvement in MEN1. Endocr Relat Cancer 2024; 31:e230162. [PMID: 38108666 PMCID: PMC10854230 DOI: 10.1530/erc-23-0162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Adrenal lesions (ALs) are often detected in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). However, they are not well described in MEN1, making their clinical management unclear. This study examined the prevalence and outcomes of ALs found in MEN1. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with MEN1 from 1990 to 2021. ALs were diagnosed using abdominal or thoracic imaging and classified as being unilateral or bilateral, having single or multiple nodules, and as having diffuse enlargement or not. Measurable nodular lesions were analyzed for their size and growth over time. Patients' clinical and radiographic characteristics were collected. We identified 382 patients with MEN1, 89 (23.3%) of whom had ALs. The mean age at detection was 47 ± 11.9 years. We documented 101 measurable nodular lesions (mean size, 17.5 mm; range, 3-123 mm). Twenty-seven nodules (26.7%) were smaller than 1 cm. Watchful waiting was indicated in 79 (78.2%) patients, of whom 28 (35.4%) had growing lesions. Functional lesions were diagnosed in 6 (15.8%) of 38 that had functional work-up (diagnoses: pheochromocytoma (n = 2), adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent hypercortisolism (n = 2), hyperandrogenism (n = 1), hyperaldosteronism (n = 1)); surgery was indicated for 5 (83.3%; n = 12 nodules), 2 of whom had bilateral, diffuse adrenal enlargement. Two patients were diagnosed with adrenocortical carcinoma and two with neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential. Radiographic or clinical progression of ALs is uncommon. Malignancy should be suspected on the basis of a lesion's growth rate and size. A baseline hormonal work-up is recommended, and no further biochemical work-up is suggested when the initial assessment shows nonfunctioning lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uriel Clemente-Gutierrez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carolina R C Pieterman
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael S Lui
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas Szabo Yamashita
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrés Tame-Elorduy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bernice L Huang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aditya S Shirali
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Derek J Erstad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Paul H Graham
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Grubbs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Steven G Waguespack
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chaan S Ng
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nancy Perrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Waguespack SG, Somaiah N, Lee JE, Elsayes KM. Incomplete Carney Triad. JCEM Case Rep 2024; 2:luae016. [PMID: 38405102 PMCID: PMC10886440 DOI: 10.1210/jcemcr/luae016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven G Waguespack
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bu JJ, Delavar A, Dayao JK, Lieu A, Chuter BG, Chen K, Nishihara T, Meller L, Camp AS, Lee JE, Baxter SL. Evaluation and Optimization of Diabetic Retinopathy Screenings for Uninsured Latinx Patients in a Resource-Limited Student-Run Free Clinic. J Stud Run Clin 2024; 10:407. [PMID: 38287932 PMCID: PMC10824512 DOI: 10.59586/jsrc.v10i1.407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
Background Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a sight-threatening condition that causes progressive retina damage. Student-run free clinics represent a valuable opportunity to provide DR screenings to high-risk populations. We characterized the patient population, evaluated the performance, and conducted a needs assessment of DR screenings at the University of California, San Diego Student-Run Ophthalmology Free Clinic, which provides care to predominantly uninsured, Latino patients. Methods Retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients seen at the free clinic since 2019 with a diagnosis of type II diabetes. Date and outcome of all DR-related screenings or visits from 2015 onward, demographics information, and DR risk factors such as A1c and insulin dependence were recorded. Predictors of diabetic retinopathy and frequency of DR screenings for each patient were analyzed using multiple logistic regression, t-test for equality of means, and Pearson's correlation. Results Of 179 uninsured diabetic patients receiving care at the free clinic, 71% were female and average age was 59. 83% had hypertension, 93% had hyperlipidemia, and 79% had metabolic syndrome. Prevalence of non-proliferative DR was 34% and that of proliferative DR was 15% in diabetic patients. The free clinic capacity in recent years plateaued at just under 50% of patients seen for DR screening or visit per year, though average wait time was over 2 years between visits. Patients with higher no-show rates had less frequent DR screenings. Chronic kidney disease and poor glycemic control were the strongest predictors of DR. Conclusion The student-run free ophthalmology clinic has been effective in providing screening and follow-up care for DR patients. Creation of a protocol to identify which patients are at highest risk of DR and should be seen more urgently, addressing no-shows, and implementation of a tele-retina program are potential avenues for improving clinic efficiency in a resource-limited setting for vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J Bu
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Arash Delavar
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - John Kevin Dayao
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alexander Lieu
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Benton G Chuter
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Kevin Chen
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Taiki Nishihara
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Leo Meller
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Andrew S Camp
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Sally L Baxter
- Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tran EM, Lee JE. Reporting Requirements, Confidentiality, and Legal Immunity for Physicians Who Report Medically Impaired Drivers. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2350495. [PMID: 38180760 PMCID: PMC10770772 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Physicians play an important role in assessing patients' ability to drive. There is a dearth of peer-reviewed information on policies regarding physician reporting of medically impaired drivers. Objective To investigate state reporting requirements and the availability of confidentiality and legal immunity for physicians who report medically impaired drivers. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study was conducted from November 1 to 30, 2022, in 3 rounds. First, all 50 US states' Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) websites were systematically reviewed. Second, DMV staff from each state were surveyed via telephone. Third, each state's legal codes for driver licensing were reviewed. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcome measures included the percentage of states with mandatory and voluntary reporting policies, reporting instructions on DMV websites, anonymous reporting options, and legal immunity for reporting physicians, in addition to characteristics of states' mandatory reporting policies (ie, types of medical conditions that require reporting) and policies surrounding the confidentiality of reports. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results One-third of state DMV websites (17 [34%]) lacked instructions regarding physician reporting. Six states had mandatory reporting requirements; 4 of these states only required reporting of conditions characterized by lapses of consciousness. Only 3 states (6%) accepted anonymous reports, and 7 states (14%) deemed physician reports of medically impaired drivers confidential without exception. Nearly one-third of states (15 [30%]) deemed reports by physicians confidential, with the exception that reported drivers could find out who reported them if they asked for a copy of the reporting form. Most states (37 [74%]) had statutes that protected physicians from liability related to reporting medically impaired drivers. Conclusions and Relevance This cross-sectional study of state reporting requirements regarding medically impaired drivers found many differences in state policies regarding mandatory reporting and the conditions that require reporting. There was also limited availability of online reporting instructions, anonymous reporting options, and legal protections for reporting physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine M. Tran
- Shiley Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Shiley Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boyev A, Azimuddin A, Newhook TE, Maxwell JE, Prakash LR, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Snyder RA, Lee JE, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Evaluation and Recalibration of Risk-Stratified Pancreatoduodenectomy Drain Fluid Amylase Removal Criteria. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2806-2814. [PMID: 37935998 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05863-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-stratified drain fluid amylase cutoff values for postoperative day 1 (POD1) (DFA1) and POD3 (DFA3) can guide early drain removal after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this study was to evaluate and recalibrate cutoff values instituted in Feb 2019 using a prospective sequential cohort. METHODS We performed a single-institution prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy following implementation of institution-specific DFA cutoffs in February 2019 through April 2022. DFA values, drain removal, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (CR-POPF) were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined optimal cutoff values. RESULTS In total, 267 patients, 173 (65%) low-risk and 94 (35%) high-risk, underwent 228 (85%) open and 39 (15%) robotic pancreatoduodenectomies. Seven (4%) low-risk patients and 21 (22%) high-risk patients developed CR-POPF. Drains were removed in 147 (55%) patients before/on POD3, with 1 (0.7%) CR-POPF. In low-risk patients, CR-POPF was excluded with 100% sensitivity if DFA1 < 286 (area under curve, AUC = 0.893, p = 0.001) or DFA3 < 97 (AUC = 0.856, p = 0.002). DFA1 < 137 (AUC = 0.786, p < 0.001) or DFA3 < 56 (AUC = 0.819, p < 0.001) were 100% sensitive in high-risk patients. Previously established DFA1 cutoffs of 100 (low-risk) and < 26 (high-risk) were 100% sensitive, while DFA3 cutoffs of 300 (low-risk) and 200 (high-risk) had 57% and 91% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS Within a learning health system, we recalibrated post-PD drain removal thresholds to DFA1 ≤ 300 and DFA3 ≤ 100 for low-risk and DFA1 ≤ 100 and DFA3 ≤ 50 for high-risk patients. This methodology is generalizable to other centers for developing institution-specific criteria to optimize safe early drain removal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ahad Azimuddin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Morgan L Bruno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Whitney L Dewhurst
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boyev A, Prakash LR, Chiang YJ, Newhook TE, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Lee JE, Snyder RA, Tzeng CWD, Katz MHG, Maxwell JE. Elevated CA 19-9 is associated with worse survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. Surg Oncol 2023; 51:101994. [PMID: 37742542 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic utility of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in ampullary adenocarcinoma is unclear. We sought to evaluate the association between initial tumor marker levels and survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. METHODS This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma from 1999 to 2021. CA 19-9 was assessed after biliary decompression. Contal and O'Quigley method determined optimal biomarker cutoff levels which were correlated with overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression. RESULTS A total of 180 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Patients with CA 19-9 >100 U/mL had a shorter median OS (28 vs. 132 months, p < 0.001) compared to patients with CA 19-9 ≤ 100 U/mL at diagnosis. Survival was similar between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal tumor subtypes when CA 19-9 was >100 U/mL (OS:25 vs. 33 months, p = 0.415). By Cox regression analysis, CA 19-9 >100 U/mL was independently associated with worse OS (HR 2.8, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative CA 19-9 >100 U/mL was associated with shorter OS in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. CA 19-9 may be useful when counseling patients about prognosis or when considering the role of perioperative systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Morgan L Bruno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Whitney L Dewhurst
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Boyev A, Jain AJ, Newhook TE, Prakash LR, Chiang YJ, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Maxwell JE, Ikoma N, Snyder RA, Lee JE, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Opioid-Free Discharge After Pancreatic Resection Through a Learning Health System Paradigm. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:e234154. [PMID: 37672236 PMCID: PMC10483385 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Postoperative opioid overprescribing leads to persistent opioid use and excess pills at risk for misuse and diversion. A learning health system paradigm using risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways (RSPCPs) may lead to reduction in inpatient and discharge opioid volume. Objective To analyze the outcomes of 2 iterative RSPCP updates on inpatient and discharge opioid volumes. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included 832 consecutive adult patients at an urban comprehensive cancer center who underwent pancreatic resection between October 2016 and April 2022, comprising 3 sequential pathway cohorts (version [V] 1, October 1, 2016, to January 31, 2019 [n = 363]; V2, February 1, 2019, to October 31, 2020 [n = 229]; V3, November 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022 [n = 240]). Exposures After V1 of the pathway established a baseline and reduced length of stay (n = 363), V2 (n = 229) updated patient and surgeon education handouts, limited intravenous opioids, suggested a 3-drug (acetaminophen, celecoxib, methocarbamol) nonopioid bundle, and implemented the 5×-multiplier (last 24-hour oral morphine equivalents [OME] multiplied by 5) to calculate discharge volume. Pathway version 3 (n = 240) required the nonopioid bundle as default in the recovery room and scheduled conversion to oral medications on postoperative day 1. Main Outcomes and Measures Inpatient and discharge opioid volume in OME across the 3 RSPCPs were compared using nonparametric testing and trend analyses. Results A total of 832 consecutive patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [56-72] years; 410 female [49.3%] and 422 male [50.7%]) underwent 541 pancreatoduodenectomies, 285 distal pancreatectomies, and 6 other pancreatectomies. Early nonopioid bundle administration increased from V1 (acetaminophen, 320 patients [88.2%]; celecoxib or anti-inflammatory, 98 patients [27.0%]; methocarbamol, 267 patients [73.6%]) to V3 (236 patients [98.3%], 163 patients [67.9%], and 238 patients [99.2%], respectively; P < .001). Total inpatient OME decreased from a median 290 mg (IQR, 157-468 mg) in V1 to 184 mg (IQR, 103-311 mg) in V2 to 129 mg (IQR, 75-206 mg) in V3 (P < .001). Discharge OME decreased from a median 150 mg (IQR, 100-225 mg) in V1 to 25 mg (IQR, 0-100 mg) in V2 to 0 mg (IQR, 0-50 mg) in V3 (P < .001). The percentage of patients discharged opioid free increased from 7.2% (26 of 363) in V1 to 52.5% (126 of 240) in V3 (P < .001), with 187 of 240 (77.9%) in V3 discharged with 50 mg OME or less. Median pain scores remained 3 or lower in all cohorts, with no differences in postdischarge refill requests. A subgroup analysis separating open and minimally invasive surgical cases showed similar results in both groups. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, the median total inpatient OME was halved and median discharge OME reduced to zero in association with a learning health system model of iterative opioid reduction that is freely adaptable by other hospitals. These findings suggest that opioid-free discharge after pancreatectomy and other major cancer operations is realistic and feasible with this no-cost blueprint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anish J Jain
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Morgan L Bruno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Whitney L Dewhurst
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boyev A, Azimuddin A, Prakash LR, Newhook TE, Maxwell JE, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Lee JE, Snyder RA, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Classification of Post-Pancreatectomy Readmissions and Opportunities for Targeted Mitigation Strategies. Ann Surg 2023:00000658-990000000-00659. [PMID: 37791481 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Within a learning health system paradigm, this study sought to evaluate reasons for readmission to identify opportunities for improvement. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Post-pancreatectomy readmission rates have remained constant despite improved index hospitalization metrics. METHODS We performed a single-institution case-control study of consecutive pancreatectomy patients (October 2016 - April 2022). Complications were prospectively graded in biweekly faculty and advanced practice provider meetings. We analyzed risk factors during index hospitalization and categorized indications for 90-day readmissions. RESULTS A total of 835 patients, median age 65 years and 51% (427/835) males, underwent 64% (534/835) pancreatoduodenectomies, 34% (280/835) distal pancreatectomies, and 3% (21/835) other resections. 24% (204/835) of patients were readmitted. Primary indication for readmission was technical in 51% (105/204), infectious in 17% (35/204), and medical/metabolic in 31% (64/204) of patients. Procedures were required in 77% (81/105) and 60% (21/35) of technical and infectious readmissions, respectively, while 66% (42/64) of medical/metabolic readmissions were managed non-invasively. During the index hospitalization, benign pathology (OR 1.8, P=0.049), biochemical pancreatic leak (OR 2.3, P=0.001), bile/gastric/chyle leak (OR 6.4, P=0.001), organ-space infection (OR 3.4, P=0.007), undrained fluid on imaging (OR 2.4, P=0.045), and increasing white blood cell count (OR 1.7, P=0.045) were independently associated with odds of readmission. CONCLUSIONS Most readmissions following pancreatectomy were technical in origin. Patients with complications during index hospitalization, increasing white blood cell count, or undrained fluid before discharge were at highest risk for readmission. Pre-discharge risk-stratification of readmission risk factors and augmentation of in-clinic resources may be strategies to reduce readmission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boyev A, Prakash LR, Chiang YJ, Childers CP, Jain AJ, Newhook TE, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Lee JE, Snyder RA, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD, Maxwell JE. Postoperative Opioid Use Is Associated with Increased Rates of Grade B/C Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2135-2144. [PMID: 37468733 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05751-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a major source of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. This study examined the association between postoperative opioid use and CR-POPF in the context of opioid-sparing postoperative care. METHODS A case-control study was performed on consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy between October 2016 and April 2022 at a single institution. Patients who developed CR-POPF were compared to controls. Multivariable regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with CR-POPF. RESULTS A total of 281 patients underwent 187 open, 20 laparoscopic, and 74 robotic-assisted operations. The rate of CR-POPF was 21% (n = 58). CR-POPF rate declined from 32 to 8% over the study period (p < 0.001). Median oral morphine equivalents (OME) administered on POD 0-1 and 0-3 were 94 and 129 mg, respectively, in patients who did not develop a fistula versus 130 and 180 mg in those who did (both p ≤ 0.001). POD 0-3 OME (OR 1.11, p = 0.044) was independently associated with increased odds of CR-POPF, with each additional 50 mg (equivalent to 10 tramadol pills) increasing the relative risk by 11% and absolute risk by 2%. CONCLUSION Early postoperative opioid use after distal pancreatectomy was associated with increased odds of CR-POPF. Decreasing perioperative opioid use through enhanced postoperative management is a low-cost and generalizable approach that may reduce rates of CR-POPF after distal pancreatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Christopher P Childers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Anish J Jain
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Morgan L Bruno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Whitney L Dewhurst
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mathew M, Virarkar M, Sun J, Thai K, Saleh M, Menendez-Santos M, Bedi D, Lee JE, Katz M, Kundra V, Bhosale P. Real-Time Ultrasound-Computed Tomography Fusion with Volume Navigation to Assess Pancreatic Cystic Lesions. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8375-8385. [PMID: 37754523 PMCID: PMC10529455 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Transabdominal ultrasound is a promising imaging modality for pancreatic cystic lesions. This study aims to determine if transabdominal ultrasonography with CT fusion (TAUS-f) using volume navigation can be used to measure pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) compared to CT alone. We evaluated 33 patients prospectively with known PCLs. The readers evaluated each PCL's size and imaging characteristics on TAUS-f and CT alone. These were compared to endoscopic ultrasonography reports. A total of 43 PCLs from 32 patients were evaluated. The detection rate by TAUS-f was 93%. Two of the three undetected PCLs were in the tail of the pancreas. Inter-reader variabilities for TAUS-f and CT were 0.005 cm and 0.03 cm, respectively. Subgroup analysis by size and location demonstrated that inter-modality variability between TAUS-f and CT was smallest for lesions < 1.5 cm with a size difference of -0.13 cm for each reader and smallest in the pancreatic head with a size difference of -0.16 cm and -0.17 cm for readers 1 and 2. We found that TAUS-f effectively evaluates PCLs compared to CT alone, thus suggesting that it should be considered part of the surveillance algorithm for a subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj Mathew
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Mayur Virarkar
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA;
| | - Jia Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.S.); (M.K.)
| | - Khoan Thai
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA (M.S.); (D.B.); (V.K.); (P.B.)
| | - Mohammed Saleh
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA (M.S.); (D.B.); (V.K.); (P.B.)
| | - Manuel Menendez-Santos
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA;
| | - Deepak Bedi
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA (M.S.); (D.B.); (V.K.); (P.B.)
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Matthew Katz
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.S.); (M.K.)
| | - Vikas Kundra
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA (M.S.); (D.B.); (V.K.); (P.B.)
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA (M.S.); (D.B.); (V.K.); (P.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ngo-Huang AT, Parker NH, Xiao L, Schadler KL, Petzel MQB, Prakash LR, Kim MP, Tzeng CWD, Lee JE, Ikoma N, Wolff RA, Javle MM, Koay EJ, Pant SD, Folloder JP, Wang X, Cotto AM, Ju YR, Garg N, Wang H, Bruera ED, Basen-Engquist KM, Katz MHG. Effects of a Pragmatic Home-based Exercise Program Concurrent With Neoadjuvant Therapy on Physical Function of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: The PancFit Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg 2023; 278:22-30. [PMID: 37026453 PMCID: PMC10330108 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of a preoperative, home-based exercise program on fitness and physical function in patients with pancreatic cancer. BACKGROUND We previously established a well-tolerated preoperative exercise program after finding a high frequency of sarcopenia and frailty in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS In this randomized, controlled trial (NCT03187951), patients with pancreatic cancer were randomized to Arm A: enhanced usual care or Arm B: prescribed aerobic and resistance exercise during neoadjuvant therapy. Patients received nutrition counseling and activity trackers. The primary endpoint was a 6-minute walk distance (6MWD; ≥14 meters improvement was clinically meaningful). Secondary endpoints included additional physical function tests, health-related quality of life, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS One hundred fifty-one patients were randomized. Objectively measured weekly activity (153.2±135.6 and 159.8±122.8 min in Arm A and B, respectively, P =0.62) and self-reported weekly moderate-to-strenuous physical activity (107.4±160.4 and 129.6±161.6 min in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, P =0.49) were similar, but weekly strength training sessions increased more in Arm B (by 1.8±1.8 vs 0.1±2.4 sessions, P <0.001). 6MWD improved in both Arm A (mean change 18.6±56.8 m, P =0.01) and Arm B (27.3±68.1 m, P =0.002). Quality of life and clinical outcomes did not significantly differ between arms. Pooling patients in both study groups, exercise, and physical activity was favorably associated with physical performance and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized trial of prescribed exercise versus enhanced usual care during neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer, a high volume of physical activity and increased exercise capacity were observed in both arms, highlighting the importance of activity among patients preparing for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An T Ngo-Huang
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nathan H Parker
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Lianchun Xiao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Keri L Schadler
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maria Q B Petzel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Milind M Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shubham D Pant
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Justin P Folloder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alicia M Cotto
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Ye Rang Ju
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Naveen Garg
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Huamin Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eduardo D Bruera
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karen M Basen-Engquist
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ayabe RI, Prakash LR, Bruno ML, Newhook TE, Maxwell JE, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Snyder RA, Lee JE, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Differential Gains in Surgical Outcomes for High-Risk vs Low-Risk Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Successive Refinements of Risk-Stratified Care Pathways. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 237:4-12. [PMID: 36786469 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of risk-stratified pancreatectomy care pathways (RSPCPs) is associated with reduced length of stay (LOS). This study sought to evaluate the impact of successive pathway revisions with the hypothesis that high-risk patients require iterative pathway revisions to optimize outcomes. STUDY DESIGN A prospectively maintained database (October 2016 to December 2021) was evaluated for pancreaticoduodenectomy patients managed with RSPCPs preoperatively assigned based on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) risk. Launched in October 2016 (version [V] 1), RSPCPs were optimized in February 2019 (V2) and November 2020 (V3). Targeted pathway components included earlier nasogastric tube removal, diet advancement, reduced intravenous fluids and opioids, institution-specific drain fluid amylase cutoffs for early day 3 removal, and patient education. Primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included major complication (Accordion grade 3+), POPF (International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery Grade B/C), and delayed gastric emptying (DGE). RESULTS Of 481 patients, 234 were managed by V1 (83 high-risk), 141 by V2 (43 high-risk), and 106 by V3 (43 high-risk). Median LOS reduction was greatest in high-risk patients with a 7-day reduction (pre-RSPCP, 12 days; V1, 9 days; V2, 7 days; V3, 5 days), compared with low-risk patients (pre-pathway, 10 days; V1, 6 days; V2, 5 days; V3, 4 days). Complications decreased significantly among high-risk patients (V1, 45%; V2, 33%; V3, 19%; p < 0.001), approaching rates in low-risk patients (V1, 21%; V2, 20%; V3, 14%). POPF (V1, 33%; V2, 23%; V3, 16%; p < 0.001) and DGE (V1, 23%; V2, 22%; V3, 14%; p < 0.001) improved among high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS Risk-stratified pancreatectomy care pathways are associated with reduced LOS, major complication, Grade B/C fistula, and DGE. The easiest gains in surgical outcomes are generated from the immediate improvement in the patients most likely to be fast-tracked, but high-risk patients benefit from successive application of the learning health system model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reed I Ayabe
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tong YT, Lai Z, Katz MHG, Prakash LR, Wang H, Chatterjee D, Kim M, Tzeng CWD, Lee JE, Ikoma N, Rashid A, Wolff RA, Zhao D, Koay EJ, Maitra A, Wang H. Prognosticators for Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Therapy and Pancreatectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092608. [PMID: 37174073 PMCID: PMC10177033 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GemNP) therapies are increasingly used to treat patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, limited data are available on their clinicopathologic prognosticators. We examined the clinicopathologic factors and survival of 213 PDAC patients who received FOLFIRINOX with 71 patients who received GemNP. The FOLFIRINOX group was younger (p < 0.01) and had a higher rate of radiation (p = 0.049), higher rate of borderline resectable and locally advanced disease (p < 0.001), higher rate of Group 1 response (p = 0.045) and lower ypN stage (p = 0.03) than the GemNP group. Within FOLFIRINOX group, radiation was associated with decreased lymph node metastasis (p = 0.01) and lower ypN stage (p = 0.01). The tumor response group, ypT, ypN, LVI and PNI, correlated significantly with both DFS and OS (p < 0.05). Patients with the ypT0/T1a/T1b tumor had better DFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.03) than those with ypT1c tumor. In multivariate analysis, the tumor response group and ypN were independently prognostic factors for DFS and OS (p < 0.05). Our study demonstrated that the FOLFIRINOX group was younger and had a better pathologic response than the GemNP group and that the tumor response group, ypN, ypT, LVI and PNI, are significant prognostic factors for survival in these patients. Our results also suggest that the tumor size of 1.0 cm is a better cut off for ypT2. Our study highlights the importance of systemic pathologic examination and the reporting of post-treatment pancreatectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Tat Tong
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zongshan Lai
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hua Wang
- Department Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Deyali Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Asif Rashid
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Dan Zhao
- Department Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Huamin Wang
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Newhook TE, Overman MJ, Chun YS, Dasari A, Tzeng CWD, Cao HST, Raymond V, Parseghian C, Johnson B, Nishioka Y, Kawaguchi Y, Uppal A, Vreeland TJ, Jaimovich A, Arvide EM, Cristo JV, Wei SH, Raghav KP, Morris VK, Lee JE, Kopetz S, Vauthey JN. Prospective Study of Perioperative Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg 2023; 277:813-820. [PMID: 35797554 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of perioperative ctDNA dynamics on outcomes after hepatectomy for CLM. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Prognostication is imprecise for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, and ctDNA is a promising biomarker. However, clinical implications of perioperative ctDNA dynamics are not well established. METHODS Patients underwent curative-intent hepatectomy after preoperative chemotherapy for CLM (2013-2017) with paired prehepatectomy/postoperative ctDNA analyses via plasma-only assay. Positivity was determined using a proprietary variant classifier. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Median follow-up was 55 months. RESULTS Forty-eight patients were included. ctDNA was detected before and after surgery (ctDNA+/+) in 14 (29%), before but not after surgery (ctDNA+/-) in 19 (40%), and not at all (ctDNA-/-) in 11 (23%). Adverse tissue somatic mutations were detected in TP53 (n = 26; 54%), RAS (n = 23; 48%), SMAD4 (n = 5; 10%), FBXW7 (n = 3; 6%), and BRAF (n = 2; 4%). ctDNA+/+ was associated with worse RFS (median: ctDNA+/+, 6.0 months; ctDNA+/-, not reached; ctDNA-/-, 33.0 months; P = 0.001). Compared to ctDNA+/+, ctDNA+/- was associated with improved RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.58)] and overall survival [HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.08-0.74)]. Adverse somatic mutations were not associated with survival. After adjustment for prehepatectomy chemotherapy, synchronous disease, and ≥2 CLM, ctDNA+/- and ctDNA-/- were independently associated with improved RFS compared to ctDNA+/+ (ctDNA+/-: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.53; ctDNA-/-: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.56). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative ctDNA dynamics are associated with survival, identify patients with high recurrence risk, and may be used to guide treatment decisions and surveillance after hepatectomy for patients with CLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael J Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Arvind Dasari
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Christine Parseghian
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Benny Johnson
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yujiro Nishioka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Abhineet Uppal
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Elsa M Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jenilette V Cristo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven H Wei
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kanwal P Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Van K Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive, robotic techniques for hepatobiliary procedures offer the potential for accelerated recovery and reduced opioid usage. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is a technically challenging procedure with a complex reconstruction. In this regard, standardization of the pancreaticojejunostomy technique is critical for safe adoption of robotic technology in pancreatic surgery. Study Design: In this video , we demonstrate the primary steps and associated principles to perform a robotic pancreaticojejunostomy using a modified Blumgart/Nagakawa technique. Results: Key steps to this procedure include: 1) exposure and positioning of the pancreatic remnant and jejunal limb; 2) transpancreatic suture placement using augmented sutures with bulldog clamps for organization; 3) duct-to-mucosa anastomosis with well-defined order of suture placement and knot-tying for optimal exposure, tissue handling, and technical ease; 4) completion of the anterior row of transpancreatic sutures using Lapra-TY clips for gentle, but firm tissue apposition; and 5) placement of omental flap and surgical drains in proximity to the reconstruction. Conclusion: We described our technique for performing a robotic pancreaticojejunostomy, which compensates for the technical limitations of the robotic approach. These adjustments in combination with the magnified surgical vision and augmented skill associated with the robotic platform allow for safe and reliable performance of the pancreaticojejunostomy technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J Erstad
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX (Erstad, Cass, Maxwell, Tran Cao, Kim, Tzeng, Lee, Ikoma)
| | - Yuji Hatanaka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan (Hatanaka)
| | - Samuel Cass
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX (Erstad, Cass, Maxwell, Tran Cao, Kim, Tzeng, Lee, Ikoma)
| | - Jessica Maxwell
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX (Erstad, Cass, Maxwell, Tran Cao, Kim, Tzeng, Lee, Ikoma)
| | - Hop Tran Cao
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX (Erstad, Cass, Maxwell, Tran Cao, Kim, Tzeng, Lee, Ikoma)
| | - Michael Kim
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX (Erstad, Cass, Maxwell, Tran Cao, Kim, Tzeng, Lee, Ikoma)
| | - Ching-Wei Tzeng
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX (Erstad, Cass, Maxwell, Tran Cao, Kim, Tzeng, Lee, Ikoma)
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX (Erstad, Cass, Maxwell, Tran Cao, Kim, Tzeng, Lee, Ikoma)
| | - Matthew Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (Katz)
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX (Erstad, Cass, Maxwell, Tran Cao, Kim, Tzeng, Lee, Ikoma)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Asare EA, Fisher SB, Chiang YJ, Haydu LE, Patel SH, Keung EZ, Lucci A, Wargo J, Gershenwald JE, Ross MI, Lee JE. Melanoma metastatic to the adrenal gland: An update on the role of adrenalectomy in multidisciplinary management. J Surg Oncol 2023. [PMID: 37010038 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Modern systemic therapy (immune checkpoint blockade [ICB], targeted therapy) has improved survival for patients with metastatic melanoma. The role of adrenal metastasectomy is not well characterized in this setting. METHODS Consecutive patients treated with adrenalectomy 1/1/2007-1/1/2019 were retrospectively compared to patients treated with systemic therapy alone in the same time period. Overall survival and survival after adrenal metastasis were compared, prognostic factors associated with survival after adrenal metastasis development were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 74 patients underwent adrenalectomy and were compared to 69 treated with systemic therapy alone. The most common indications for adrenalectomy were to render the patient disease-free in the setting of isolated adrenal metastasis (n = 32, 43.2%) or treatment of isolated progression in the setting of other stable/responding metastases (n = 32, 43.2%). Patients treated surgically had longer survival (116.9 vs. 11.0 months after adrenal metastasis diagnosis, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, receipt of ICB (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.40-0.95]) and selection for adrenalectomy (HR: 0.27, 95% CI: [0.17-0.42]) were the strongest factors associated with improved survival after adrenal metastasis diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Selective application of adrenal metastasectomy is associated with prolonged survival benefit and remains an important consideration in the multidisciplinary management of patients with metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot A Asare
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren E Haydu
- Department of Biostatistics, United States Air Force Special Warfare Training Wing, Joint Base San Antonio, Lackland, Bexar County, Texas, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Witt RG, Hirata Y, Prakash LR, Newhook TE, Maxwell JE, Kim MP, Tran Cao HS, Lee JE, Vauthey JN, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD, Ikoma N. Comparative analysis of opioid use between robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2023; 30:523-531. [PMID: 35796581 PMCID: PMC9823147 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways using regional anesthesia and multimodality analgesia have decreased overall opioid use, but the additional benefits of robotic surgery in opioid reduction for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) are unknown. We compared the inpatient opioid use between robotic PD and open PD. METHODS Patients undergoing open PD within a protocol evaluating preincisional regional anesthetic block bundles were compared to consecutively-treated patients undergoing robotic PD identified from a prospectively maintained single-institutional database. Clinical characteristics, operative outcomes, pain scores and inpatient oral morphine equivalent (OME) use were compared between patients treated with robotic or open PD. Patients with a history of continuous-release opioid dependence were excluded. RESULTS Of 114 total patients, 25 underwent robotic PD and 89 underwent open PD. Intraoperative opioid use was not different (P = .87), nor were cumulative pain scores. Robotic PD patients used significantly fewer OMEs per day on postoperative days 1-4 (P = .039), used fewer total OMEs during hospitalization (robotic: median = 79, IQR 42.5-141; open: median = 126, IQR 61.3-203.8; P = .0036) and were discharged with fewer OMEs (robotic: median = 0, IQR 0-43.8; open: median = 25, IQR 0-75; P = .009) despite a shorter length of stay (robotic: median = 4, open: median = 5, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS Robotic PD patients required fewer inpatient OMEs than open PD while maintaining similar pain scores. A higher percentage of robotic PD patients tapered off of opioids prior to discharge than open surgery patients treated with a standardized opioid reduction protocol despite a shorter length of stay. These results provide a rationale for choosing robotic PD when feasible to minimize opioid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell G Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yuki Hirata
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sohn AJ, Taherian M, Katz MHG, Prakash LR, Chatterjee D, Wang H, Kim M, Tzeng CWD, Lee JE, Ikoma N, Rashid A, Wolff RA, Zhao D, Koay EJ, Sun R, Maitra A, Wang H. Integrated Pathologic Score Effectively Stratifies Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg Pathol 2023; 47:421-430. [PMID: 36746143 PMCID: PMC10023386 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used to treat patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Pathologic parameters of treated PDAC, including tumor (ypT) and lymph node (ypN) stage, and tumor response grading (TRG) are important prognostic factors in this group of patients. To our knowledge, a multifactorial prognostic score combining pathologic features including ypT, ypN, and TRG in treated PDAC patients has not been reported. Our cohort consisted of 398 PDAC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at our institution. All pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens were grossly and microscopically evaluated using a standard protocol. The integrated pathologic score (IPS) was calculated as the sum of the scores for ypT, ypN, and TRG according to either the MD Anderson grading system (IPSMDA) or the College of American Pathologists (CAP) grading system (IPSCAP). The IPSMDA and IPSCAP were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and patient survival. Using either IPSMDA or IPSCAP, PDAC patients were stratified into 3 distinct prognostic groups for both disease-free survival (DFS) ( P <0.001) and overall survival (OS) ( P <0.001). The IPSMDA and IPSCAP correlated with tumor differentiation, margin status, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and tumor recurrence ( P <0.05). In multivariate analysis, IPSMDA, IPSCAP, margin status, and tumor differentiation were independent prognostic factors for both DFS ( P <0.05) and OS ( P <0.05). However, patients with AJCC stage IB, IIA, or IIB disease had no significant difference in either DFS or OS ( P >0.05). The IPS appears to provide improved prognostic information compared with AJCC staging for preoperatively treated patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Sohn
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mehran Taherian
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew HG Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Deyali Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hua Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Asif Rashid
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dan Zhao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ryan Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Huamin Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Amaria RN, Postow M, Burton EM, Tetzlaff MT, Ross MI, Torres-Cabala C, Glitza IC, Duan F, Milton DR, Busam K, Simpson L, McQuade JL, Wong MK, Gershenwald JE, Lee JE, Goepfert RP, Keung EZ, Fisher SB, Betof-Warner A, Shoushtari AN, Callahan M, Coit D, Bartlett EK, Bello D, Momtaz P, Nicholas C, Gu A, Zhang X, Korivi BR, Patnana M, Patel SP, Diab A, Lucci A, Prieto VG, Davies MA, Allison JP, Sharma P, Wargo JA, Ariyan C, Tawbi HA. Author Correction: Neoadjuvant relatlimab and nivolumab in resectable melanoma. Nature 2023; 615:E23. [PMID: 36894629 PMCID: PMC10033416 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05892-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Michael Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Carlos Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fei Duan
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Klaus Busam
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauren Simpson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Allison Betof-Warner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander N Shoushtari
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaret Callahan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Coit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danielle Bello
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parisa Momtaz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Courtney Nicholas
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aidi Gu
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xuejun Zhang
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brinda Rao Korivi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Madhavi Patnana
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James P Allison
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Charlotte Ariyan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Newhook TE, Vreeland TJ, Griffin JF, Tidwell RSS, Prakash LR, Koay EJ, Ludmir EB, Smaglo BG, Pant S, Overman M, Wolff RA, Ikoma N, Maxwell J, Kim MP, Lee JE, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Prognosis Associated With CA19-9 Response Dynamics and Normalization During Neoadjuvant Therapy in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2023; 277:484-490. [PMID: 36649067 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize associations between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) dynamics during neoadjuvant therapy (NT) and survival for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). BACKGROUND Although normalization of CA19-9 during NT is associated with improved outcomes following PDAC resection, we hypothesize that CA19-9 dynamics during NT can improve prognostication. METHODS Characteristics for patients with PDAC undergoing NT (July 2011-October 2018) with ≥3 CA19-9 results (bilirubin<2mg/dL) were collected and grouped by CA19-9 dynamics. Nonproducers (<1 U/ml) were excluded, and normal was ≤35 U/ml. Postresection survival was compared among groups. RESULTS Of 431 patients, 166 had eligible CA19-9 values. Median baseline CA19-9 was 98 U/ml. Overall 2-year postresection recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 37% and 63%, respectively. Patients with normalization (53%) had improved 2-year RFS (47% vs. 28%, P = 0.01) and OS (75% vs. 49%, P = 0.01). CA19-9 dynamics during NT were analyzed by shape, direction, and normalization creating response types ("A-B-C-D-E"). Type A was "Always" decreasing to normalization, B "Bidirectional" with eventual normalization, C "Consistently" normal, D any "Decrease" without normalization, and E "Elevating" without normalization. Types A and B responses were associated with the longest postresection 2-year RFS (51% and 56%) and OS (75% and 92%, respectively) whereas Types D and E had the worst outcomes. After adjusting for node-positivity, perineural invasion, and margin-positivity, CA19-9 response types were independently associated with both RFS and OS, and predicted outcomes are better than CA19-9 normalization alone (likelihood ratio test RFS P < 0.001, OS P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This novel A-B-C-D-E classification of CA19-9 dynamics during NT was associated with postresection outcomes more precisely than CA19-9 normalization alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Rebecca S S Tidwell
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brandon G Smaglo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jessica Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hester CA, Kothari AN, Mason M, Maxwell J, Ikoma N, Kim MP, Tzeng CWD, Lee JE, Katz MHG, Cao HST. Surgical Eligibility Does Not Imply Surgical Equity: Recommendations for Curative Treatment in Patients With Stage I/II Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma Differ by Age and Race. Ann Surg 2023; 277:321-328. [PMID: 34183508 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to characterize differences in pancreatectomy recommendation rates to surgically eligible patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head across age and racial groups. BACKGROUND Pancreatectomy is not recommended in almost half of otherwise healthy patients with stage I/II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma lacking a surgical contraindication. We characterized differences in pancreatectomy recommendation among surgically eligible patients across age and racial groups. METHODS Non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients were identified in the National Cancer Database with clinical stage I/II pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0 to 1, and age 40 to 89 years. Rates of surgery recommendation and overall survival (OS) by age and race were compared. A Pancreatectomy Recommendation Equivalence Point (PREP) was defined as the age at which the rate of not recommending surgery matched the rate of recommending and completing surgery. Marginal standardization was used to identify association of age and race with recommendation. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. RESULTS Among 40,866 patients, 36,133 (88%) were NHW and 4733 (12%) were NHB. For the entire cohort, PREP was 79 years. PREP was 5 years younger in NHB patients than in NHW patients (75 vs 80 years). Adjusted rates of not recommending surgery were significantly higher for NHB than for NHW patients in each age group. After adjusting for surgery recommendation, we found no difference in OS between NHW and NHB patients (hazard ratio 0.98 [95% CI 0.94-1.02]). CONCLUSIONS PREP of NHB patients was 5 years younger than NHW patients, and in every age group, the rate of not recommending pancreatectomy was higher in NHB patients. Age and race disparities in treatment recommendations may contribute to shorter longevity of NHB patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin A Hester
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Donovan EC, Prakash LR, Chiang YJ, Bruno ML, Maxwell JE, Ikoma N, Tzeng CWD, Katz MHG, Lee JE, Kim MP. Incidence of Postoperative Complications Following Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cystic Lesions or Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:319-327. [PMID: 36443557 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05534-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the risks of pancreatectomy for mucinous pancreatic cysts (MCs) are balanced against the putative goal of removing potentially malignant tumors. Despite undergoing similar operations, different rates of perioperative complications and morbidity between MC and PDAC patient populations may affect recommendations for resection. We therefore sought to compare the rates of postoperative complications between patients undergoing pancreatectomies for MCs or PDAC. METHODS A prospectively maintained institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent surgical resection for MCs or PDAC from July 2011 to August 2019. Patient demographics, complications, and perioperative data were compared between groups. RESULTS A total of 103 patients underwent surgical resection for MCs and 428 patients underwent resection for PDAC. Combined major 90-day postoperative complications were similar between MC and PDAC patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD, 32.5% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.068) or distal pancreatectomy (DP, 30.2% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.172). The most frequent complications were postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), abscess, and postoperative bleeding. The incidence of 90-day ISGPS Grade B/C POPF was higher in cyst patients undergoing PD (17.5% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.003) but not DP (25.4% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.473). No significant differences in operative time or length of stay between MCs and PDAC cohorts were observed. CONCLUSIONS POPFs occur more frequently and at higher grades in patients undergoing PD for MCs than for PDAC and should inform patient selection. Accordingly, the perioperative management of MC patients undergoing PD should emphasize POPF risk mitigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen C Donovan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Morgan L Bruno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, FCT17.6006, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hahn AW, Menk AV, Rivadeneira DB, Augustin RC, Xu M, Li J, Wu X, Mishra AK, Gide TN, Quek C, Zang Y, Spencer CN, Menzies AM, Daniel CR, Hudgens CW, Nowicki T, Haydu LE, Khan MAW, Gopalakrishnan V, Burton EM, Malke J, Simon JM, Bernatchez C, Putluri N, Woodman SE, Vashisht Gopal YN, Guerrieri R, Fischer GM, Wang J, Wani KM, Thompson JF, Lee JE, Hwu P, Ajami N, Gershenwald JE, Long GV, Scolyer RA, Tetzlaff MT, Lazar AJ, Schadendorf D, Wargo JA, Kirkwood JM, DeBerardinis RJ, Liang H, Futreal A, Zhang J, Wilmott JS, Peng W, Davies MA, Delgoffe GM, Najjar YG, McQuade JL. Obesity Is Associated with Altered Tumor Metabolism in Metastatic Melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:154-164. [PMID: 36166093 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Overweight/obese (OW/OB) patients with metastatic melanoma unexpectedly have improved outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF-targeted therapies. The mechanism(s) underlying this association remain unclear, thus we assessed the integrated molecular, metabolic, and immune profile of tumors, as well as gut microbiome features, for associations with patient body mass index (BMI). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Associations between BMI [normal (NL < 25) or OW/OB (BMI ≥ 25)] and tumor or microbiome characteristics were examined in specimens from 782 patients with metastatic melanoma across 7 cohorts. DNA associations were evaluated in The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. RNA sequencing from 4 cohorts (n = 357) was batch corrected and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) by BMI category was performed. Metabolic profiling was conducted in a subset of patients (x = 36) by LC/MS, and in flow-sorted melanoma tumor cells (x = 37) and patient-derived melanoma cell lines (x = 17) using the Seahorse XF assay. Gut microbiome features were examined in an independent cohort (n = 371). RESULTS DNA mutations and copy number variations were not associated with BMI. GSEA demonstrated that tumors from OW/OB patients were metabolically quiescent, with downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation and multiple other metabolic pathways. Direct metabolite analysis and functional metabolic profiling confirmed decreased central carbon metabolism in OW/OB metastatic melanoma tumors and patient-derived cell lines. The overall structure, diversity, and taxonomy of the fecal microbiome did not differ by BMI. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that the host metabolic phenotype influences melanoma metabolism and provide insight into the improved outcomes observed in OW/OB patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICIs and targeted therapies. See related commentary by Smalley, p. 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W Hahn
- Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ashley V Menk
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Ryan C Augustin
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mingchu Xu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Division of Basic Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiaogang Wu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Aditya K Mishra
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tuba N Gide
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Camelia Quek
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yan Zang
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carrie R Daniel
- Department of Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Courtney W Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Theodore Nowicki
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lauren E Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - M A Wadud Khan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vancheswaran Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jared Malke
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Julie M Simon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Biologics Development, Division of Therapeutics Discovery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nagireddy Putluri
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Scott E Woodman
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Y N Vashisht Gopal
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Renato Guerrieri
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grant M Fischer
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Division of Biosciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Khalida M Wani
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa Bay, Florida
| | - Nadim Ajami
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Division of Dermatopathology, Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Partner site Essen, Germany
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John M Kirkwood
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ralph J DeBerardinis
- Children's Medical Research Institute and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Han Liang
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Division of Basic Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jianhua Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James S Wilmott
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Greg M Delgoffe
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Yana G Najjar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ikoma N, Seo YD, Newhook TE, Maxwell JE, Kim MP, Tran Cao HS, Tzeng CWD, Chun YS, Lee JE, Vauthey JN, Katz MHG. Quality of superior mesenteric and hepatic artery dissection in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2023; 30:e1-e2. [PMID: 35950790 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
This video manuscript by Ikoma and colleagues demonstrates their approach to the superior mesenteric artery and hepatic artery periadventitial dissection. The quality of superior mesenteric artery and hepatic artery dissections should be maintained in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy when performed for pancreatic cancer, to provide the best possible oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yongwoo D Seo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shirali AS, Clemente-Gutierrez U, Huang BL, Lui MS, Chiang YJ, Jimenez C, Fisher SB, Graham PH, Lee JE, Grubbs EG, Perrier ND. Pheochromocytoma recurrence in hereditary disease: does a cortical-sparing technique increase recurrence rate? Surgery 2023; 173:26-34. [PMID: 36229248 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy is an appealing approach for patients with hereditary pheochromocytoma and lends well to cortex preservation. We sought to examine pheochromocytoma recurrence in patients with hereditary pheochromocytoma in the era of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and evaluate the predictors of recurrence. METHODS Patients with hereditary pheochromocytoma who underwent adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma between 1995 and 2020 with biochemical cure and follow-up >1 year were identified. Recurrence was defined as plasma metanephrines above the upper limit of normal with radiographic evidence of disease in the ipsilateral adrenal bed. RESULTS Seventy-eight hereditary pheochromocytoma patients (median age = 32.4 years; 60.3% women) underwent 114 adrenalectomies for pheochromocytoma. Of these patients, 40 had multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (51.3%), 10 had multiple endocrine neoplasia type B (12.8%), 17 had von Hippel-Lindau disease (21.8%), and 11 had neurofibromatosis type 1 (14.1%). Thirty-eight adrenalectomies (33.3%) were performed before the introduction of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and 76 (66.7%) after. Cortical-sparing technique was performed in 62 (54.4%) adrenalectomies, with no difference in its use before and after posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy introduction (P > .05). During a median follow-up of 80.7 months (interquartile range 43.4-151.2), 12 ipsilateral recurrences (10.5%) were identified. There was no difference in recurrence before and after the introduction of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy or by surgical technique or approach of the entire cohort (P > .05). Recurrence was more common in those with RET M918T mutation (23.5% vs 8.2%; P = .05). Patients with RET M918T mutations had a shorter recurrence-free survival (P = .013). On multivariate analysis, only RET M918T mutation was independently associated with an increased recurrence risk (hazard ratio = 4.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-14.66; P = .019). CONCLUSION The introduction of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy did not influence the recurrence rate after adrenalectomy for hereditary pheochromocytoma patients. Patients with a RET M918T germline mutation are at increased risk for pheochromocytoma recurrence and may benefit from initial total adrenalectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya S Shirali
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. https://twitter.com/AdityaShiraliMD
| | | | - Bernice L Huang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael S Lui
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Camilo Jimenez
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul H Graham
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth G Grubbs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. https://twitter.com/EGrubbsMD
| | - Nancy D Perrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Orlow I, Sadeghi KD, Edmiston SN, Kenney JM, Lezcano C, Wilmott JS, Cust AE, Scolyer RA, Mann GJ, Lee TK, Burke H, Jakrot V, Shang P, Ferguson PM, Boyce TW, Ko JS, Ngo P, Funchain P, Rees JR, O'Connell K, Hao H, Parrish E, Conway K, Googe PB, Ollila DW, Moschos SJ, Hernando E, Hanniford D, Argibay D, Amos CI, Lee JE, Osman I, Luo L, Kuan PF, Aurora A, Gould Rothberg BE, Bosenberg MW, Gerstenblith MR, Thompson C, Bogner PN, Gorlov IP, Holmen SL, Brunsgaard EK, Saenger YM, Shen R, Seshan V, Nagore E, Ernstoff MS, Busam KJ, Begg CB, Thomas NE, Berwick M. InterMEL: An international biorepository and clinical database to uncover predictors of survival in early-stage melanoma. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0269324. [PMID: 37011054 PMCID: PMC10069769 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We are conducting a multicenter study to identify classifiers predictive of disease-specific survival in patients with primary melanomas. Here we delineate the unique aspects, challenges, and best practices for optimizing a study of generally small-sized pigmented tumor samples including primary melanomas of at least 1.05mm from AJTCC TNM stage IIA-IIID patients. We also evaluated tissue-derived predictors of extracted nucleic acids' quality and success in downstream testing. This ongoing study will target 1,000 melanomas within the international InterMEL consortium. METHODS Following a pre-established protocol, participating centers ship formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue sections to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for the centralized handling, dermatopathology review and histology-guided coextraction of RNA and DNA. Samples are distributed for evaluation of somatic mutations using next gen sequencing (NGS) with the MSK-IMPACTTM assay, methylation-profiling (Infinium MethylationEPIC arrays), and miRNA expression (Nanostring nCounter Human v3 miRNA Expression Assay). RESULTS Sufficient material was obtained for screening of miRNA expression in 683/685 (99%) eligible melanomas, methylation in 467 (68%), and somatic mutations in 560 (82%). In 446/685 (65%) cases, aliquots of RNA/DNA were sufficient for testing with all three platforms. Among samples evaluated by the time of this analysis, the mean NGS coverage was 249x, 59 (18.6%) samples had coverage below 100x, and 41/414 (10%) failed methylation QC due to low intensity probes or insufficient Meta-Mixed Interquartile (BMIQ)- and single sample (ss)- Noob normalizations. Six of 683 RNAs (1%) failed Nanostring QC due to the low proportion of probes above the minimum threshold. Age of the FFPE tissue blocks (p<0.001) and time elapsed from sectioning to co-extraction (p = 0.002) were associated with methylation screening failures. Melanin reduced the ability to amplify fragments of 200bp or greater (absent/lightly pigmented vs heavily pigmented, p<0.003). Conversely, heavily pigmented tumors rendered greater amounts of RNA (p<0.001), and of RNA above 200 nucleotides (p<0.001). CONCLUSION Our experience with many archival tissues demonstrates that with careful management of tissue processing and quality control it is possible to conduct multi-omic studies in a complex multi-institutional setting for investigations involving minute quantities of FFPE tumors, as in studies of early-stage melanoma. The study describes, for the first time, the optimal strategy for obtaining archival and limited tumor tissue, the characteristics of the nucleic acids co-extracted from a unique cell lysate, and success rate in downstream applications. In addition, our findings provide an estimate of the anticipated attrition that will guide other large multicenter research and consortia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Orlow
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Keimya D Sadeghi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Sharon N Edmiston
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jessica M Kenney
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Cecilia Lezcano
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - James S Wilmott
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Graham J Mann
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Tim K Lee
- British Columbia Cancer Research Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hazel Burke
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Valerie Jakrot
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ping Shang
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter M Ferguson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and New South Wales Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tawny W Boyce
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Jennifer S Ko
- Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Peter Ngo
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Pauline Funchain
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Judy R Rees
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America
| | - Kelli O'Connell
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Honglin Hao
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Eloise Parrish
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Kathleen Conway
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Paul B Googe
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - David W Ollila
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Stergios J Moschos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Eva Hernando
- Department of Pathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Douglas Hanniford
- Department of Pathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Diana Argibay
- Department of Pathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Christopher I Amos
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Iman Osman
- Department of Urology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
- Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Li Luo
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Pei-Fen Kuan
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America
| | - Arshi Aurora
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Bonnie E Gould Rothberg
- Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Marcus W Bosenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Meg R Gerstenblith
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
- Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Cheryl Thompson
- Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Paul N Bogner
- Department of Dermatology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
- Department of Pathology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Ivan P Gorlov
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Sheri L Holmen
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Elise K Brunsgaard
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Yvonne M Saenger
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America
- Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America
| | - Ronglai Shen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Venkatraman Seshan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Eduardo Nagore
- Department of Dermatology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marc S Ernstoff
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, ImmunoOncology Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Klaus J Busam
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Colin B Begg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Nancy E Thomas
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Marianne Berwick
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kang Y, Deng J, Ling J, Li X, Chiang YJ, Koay EJ, Wang H, Burks JK, Chiao PJ, Hurd MW, Bhutani MS, Lee JH, Weston BR, Maitra A, Ikoma N, Tzeng CWD, Lee JE, DePinho RA, Wolff RA, Pant S, McAllister F, Katz MH, Fleming JB, Kim MP. 3D imaging analysis on an organoid-based platform guides personalized treatment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Invest 2022; 132:e151604. [PMID: 36282600 PMCID: PMC9753992 DOI: 10.1172/jci151604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies, with unpredictable responses to chemotherapy. Approaches to assay patient tumors before treatment and identify effective treatment regimens based on tumor sensitivities are lacking. We developed an organoid-based platform (OBP) to visually quantify patient-derived organoid (PDO) responses to drug treatments and associated tumor-stroma modulation for personalized PDAC therapy.METHODSWe retrospectively quantified apoptotic responses and tumor-stroma cell proportions in PDOs via 3D immunofluorescence imaging through annexin A5, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) levels. Simultaneously, an ex vivo organoid drug sensitivity assay (ODSA) was used to measure responses to standard-of-care regimens. Differences between ODSA results and patient tumor responses were assessed by exact McNemar's test.RESULTSImmunofluorescence signals, organoid growth curves, and Ki-67 levels were measured and authenticated through the OBP for up to 14 days. ODSA drug responses were not different from patient tumor responses, as reflected by CA19-9 reductions following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.99). PDOs demonstrated unique apoptotic and tumor-stroma modulation profiles (P < 0.0001). α-SMA/CK-19 ratio levels of more than 1.0 were associated with improved outcomes (P = 0.0179) and longer parental patient survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.0046).CONCLUSIONHeterogenous apoptotic drug responses and tumor-stroma modulation are present in PDOs after standard-of-care chemotherapy. Ratios of α-SMA and CK-19 levels in PDOs are associated with patient survival, and the OBP could aid in the selection of personalized therapies to improve the efficacy of systemic therapy in patients with PDAC.FUNDINGNIH/National Cancer Institute grants (K08CA218690, P01 CA117969, R50 CA243707-01A1, U54CA224065), the Skip Viragh Foundation, the Bettie Willerson Driver Cancer Research Fund, and a Cancer Center Support Grant for the Flow Cytometry and Cellular Imaging Core Facility (P30CA16672).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya’an Kang
- Department of Surgical Oncology
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Huamin Wang
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology
| | | | | | - Mark W. Hurd
- Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research
| | | | - Jeffrey H. Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shubham Pant
- Department of GI Medical Oncology
- Department of Cancer Therapeutics, and
| | - Florencia McAllister
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Jason B. Fleming
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michael P. Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Koay EJ, Zaid M, Aliru M, Bagereka P, Van Wieren A, Rodriguez MJ, Jacobson G, Wolff RA, Overman M, Varadhachary G, Pant S, Wang H, Tzeng CW, Ikoma N, Kim M, Lee JE, Katz MH, Tamm E, Bhosale P, Taniguchi CM, Holliday EB, Smith GL, Ludmir EB, Minsky BD, Crane CH, Koong AC, Das P, Wang X, Javle M, Krishnan S. Nab-Paclitaxel, Capecitabine, and Radiation Therapy After Induction Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Phase 1 Trial and Imaging-based Biomarker Validation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:444-453. [PMID: 35863672 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Effective consolidative chemoradiation (CRT) regimens are lacking. In this phase 1 trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, and radiation therapy after induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC and BRPC). Also, we evaluated a computed tomography (CT)-based biomarker of response. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, underwent computed tomography-imaging, received a diagnosis of LAPC or BRPC, and received induction chemotherapy. Standard 3 + 3 study design was used, with 3 escalating nab-paclitaxel dose levels (50, 75, and 100 mg/m2) with concurrent capecitabine and RT in cohort sizes of 3 starting at the lowest dose. Dose limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3 or higher toxicity. Patients were restaged 4 to 6 weeks post-CRT completion, and surgical resection was offered to those with stable/responsive disease. We scored the tumor interface response (IR) postchemotherapy and post-CRT into type I (remained/became more defined) and type II (became less defined). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from time of CRT were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. P ≤ .05 was considered significant. RESULTS Twenty-three patients started and finished on protocol (LAPC = 14, BRPC = 9). No grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported in level 1 (n = 3) or level 2 (n = 3) initial groups. Two patients in the initial level 3 group developed dose limiting toxicity, establishing level 2 dose as the maximal tolerated dose. Level 2 group was expanded for additional 15 patients (for a total of 23 on trial), 5 of whom developed grade 3 toxicities. Seven patients underwent surgical resection. Median OS and PFS were 21.2 and 8.1 months, respectively. Type I IR was associated with better OS (P = .004) and PFS (P = .03) compared with type II IR. CONCLUSIONS We established the maximum tolerated dose for nab-paclitaxel in a consolidative CRT regimen for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Preliminary efficacy results warrant phase 2 trial evaluation. IR may be used for personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene J Koay
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Mohamed Zaid
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Maureen Aliru
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Polycarpe Bagereka
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Arie Van Wieren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Maria Jovie Rodriguez
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Galia Jacobson
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael Overman
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gauri Varadhachary
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Huamin Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ching-Wei Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew Hg Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eric Tamm
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cullen M Taniguchi
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Albert C Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of GI Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Luo L, Shen R, Arora A, Orlow I, Busam KJ, Lezcano C, Lee TK, Hernando E, Gorlov I, Amos C, Ernstoff MS, Seshan VE, Cust AE, Wilmott J, Scolyer R, Mann G, Nagore E, Funchain P, Ko J, Ngo P, Edmiston SN, Conway K, Googe PB, Ollila D, Lee JE, Fang S, Rees JR, Thompson CL, Gerstenblith M, Bosenberg M, Gould Rothberg B, Osman I, Saenger Y, Reynolds AZ, Schwartz M, Boyce T, Holmen S, Brunsgaard E, Bogner P, Kuan PF, Wiggins C, Thomas N, Begg CB, Berwick M. Landscape of mutations in early stage primary cutaneous melanoma: An InterMEL study. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2022; 35:605-612. [PMID: 35876628 PMCID: PMC9640183 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.13058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
It is unclear why some melanomas aggressively metastasize while others remain indolent. Available studies employing multi-omic profiling of melanomas are based on large primary or metastatic tumors. We examine the genomic landscape of early-stage melanomas diagnosed prior to the modern era of immunological treatments. Untreated cases with Stage II/III cutaneous melanoma were identified from institutions throughout the United States, Australia and Spain. FFPE tumor sections were profiled for mutation, methylation and microRNAs. Preliminary results from mutation profiling and clinical pathologic correlates show the distribution of four driver mutation sub-types: 31% BRAF; 18% NRAS; 21% NF1; 26% Triple Wild Type. BRAF mutant tumors had younger age at diagnosis, more associated nevi, more tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and fewer thick tumors although at generally more advanced stage. NF1 mutant tumors were frequent on the head/neck in older patients with severe solar elastosis, thicker tumors but in earlier stages. Triple Wild Type tumors were predominantly male, frequently on the leg, with more perineural invasion. Mutations in TERT, TP53, CDKN2A and ARID2 were observed often, with TP53 mutations occurring particularly frequently in the NF1 sub-type. The InterMEL study will provide the most extensive multi-omic profiling of early-stage melanoma to date. Initial results demonstrate a nuanced understanding of the mutational and clinicopathological landscape of these early-stage tumors.
Collapse
|
33
|
Amaria RN, Postow M, Burton EM, Tetzlaff MT, Ross MI, Torres-Cabala C, Glitza IC, Duan F, Milton DR, Busam K, Simpson L, McQuade JL, Wong MK, Gershenwald JE, Lee JE, Goepfert RP, Keung EZ, Fisher SB, Betof-Warner A, Shoushtari AN, Callahan M, Coit D, Bartlett EK, Bello D, Momtaz P, Nicholas C, Gu A, Zhang X, Korivi BR, Patnana M, Patel SP, Diab A, Lucci A, Prieto VG, Davies MA, Allison JP, Sharma P, Wargo JA, Ariyan C, Tawbi HA. Neoadjuvant relatlimab and nivolumab in resectable melanoma. Nature 2022; 611:155-160. [PMID: 36289334 PMCID: PMC9607737 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05368-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Relatlimab and nivolumab combination immunotherapy improves progression-free survival over nivolumab monotherapy in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma1. We investigated this regimen in patients with resectable clinical stage III or oligometastatic stage IV melanoma (NCT02519322). Patients received two neoadjuvant doses (nivolumab 480 mg and relatlimab 160 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) followed by surgery, and then ten doses of adjuvant combination therapy. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate2. The combination resulted in 57% pCR rate and 70% overall pathologic response rate among 30 patients treated. The radiographic response rate using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 was 57%. No grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events were observed in the neoadjuvant setting. The 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 100% and 92% for patients with any pathologic response, compared to 88% and 55% for patients who did not have a pathologic response (P = 0.005). Increased immune cell infiltration at baseline, and decrease in M2 macrophages during treatment, were associated with pathologic response. Our results indicate that neoadjuvant relatlimab and nivolumab induces a high pCR rate. Safety during neoadjuvant therapy is favourable compared to other combination immunotherapy regimens. These data, in combination with the results of the RELATIVITY-047 trial1, provide further confirmation of the efficacy and safety of this new immunotherapy regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Michael Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Carlos Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fei Duan
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Klaus Busam
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauren Simpson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Allison Betof-Warner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander N Shoushtari
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaret Callahan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Coit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danielle Bello
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parisa Momtaz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Courtney Nicholas
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aidi Gu
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xuejun Zhang
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brinda Rao Korivi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Madhavi Patnana
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James P Allison
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Charlotte Ariyan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
DiPeri TP, Newhook TE, Prakash LR, Ikoma N, Maxwell JE, Kim MP, Lee JE, Katz MH, Tzeng CWD. Prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative CA 19-9 normalization in pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy or surgery first. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:1021-1027. [PMID: 35726394 PMCID: PMC9547830 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Normal(ization) of serum carbohydrate 19-9 (CA19-9) before/after surgery has not been compared in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NT) versus surgery-first (SF). METHODS Characteristics for patients with PDAC who underwent resection from July 2011 to October 2018 were collected. Patients with pre-/postoperative CA19-9, bilirubin <2 mg/dL, and initial CA19-9 > 1 U/ml were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared by pre-/postoperative CA19-9. RESULTS In patients receiving NT, normal pre/postoperative CA19-9 ("NTnl/nl ") was associated with median RFS and OS (26 and 77mo), followed by those who normalized after surgery ("NTabnl/nl " 16 and 44mo). For SF patients, normal pre-/postoperative CA19-9 ("SFnl/nl ") was associated with median RFS and OS (115 and not estimable mo), followed by those who normalized after resection ("SFabnl/nl " 18 and 49mo). Groups "NTabnl/abnl " and "SFabnl/abnl " with elevated CA19-9 both before and after resection had the worst median RFS and OS durations. CONCLUSIONS While a normal(ized) postoperative CA19-9 may result in similar survival as preoperative normal(ization), postoperative normalization failed to occur in nearly 30% of SF patients. NT should be considered in patients presenting with elevated CA19-9. If considering SF, ideal patients may include those with normal CA19-9 at presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P. DiPeri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Timothy E. Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Laura R. Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Jessica E. Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Michael P. Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Matthew H.G. Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Vance TDR, Yip P, Jiménez E, Li S, Gawol D, Byrnes J, Usón I, Ziyyat A, Lee JE. SPACA6 ectodomain structure reveals a conserved superfamily of gamete fusion-associated proteins. Commun Biol 2022; 5:984. [PMID: 36115925 PMCID: PMC9482655 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03883-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
SPACA6 is a sperm-expressed surface protein that is critical for gamete fusion during mammalian sexual reproduction. Despite this fundamental role, little is known about how SPACA6 specifically functions. We elucidated the crystal structure of the SPACA6 ectodomain at 2.2-Å resolution, revealing a two-domain protein containing a four-helix bundle and Ig-like β-sandwich connected via a quasi-flexible linker. This structure is reminiscent of IZUMO1, another gamete fusion-associated protein, making SPACA6 and IZUMO1 founding members of a superfamily of fertilization-associated proteins, herein dubbed the IST superfamily. The IST superfamily is defined structurally by its distorted four-helix bundle and a pair of disulfide-bonded CXXC motifs. A structure-based search of the AlphaFold human proteome identified more protein members to this superfamily; remarkably, many of these proteins are linked to gamete fusion. The SPACA6 structure and its connection to other IST-superfamily members provide a missing link in our knowledge of mammalian gamete fusion. The crystal structure of sperm-expressed surface protein SPACA6 shows similarities to IZUMO1 though their functions are not redundant. Structural homology search in the AlphaFold human proteome and sequence search suggest a superfamily of mammalian gamete fusion-associated proteins.
Collapse
|
36
|
Hester CA, Perri G, Prakash LR, Maxwell JE, Ikoma N, Kim MP, Tzeng CWD, Smaglo B, Wolff R, Javle M, Overman MJ, Lee JE, Katz MHG. Radiographic and Serologic Response to First-Line Chemotherapy in Unresected Localized Pancreatic Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:887-897.e3. [PMID: 35948035 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine the clinical relevance of putative radiographic and serologic metrics of chemotherapy response in patients with localized pancreatic cancer (LPC) who do not undergo pancreatectomy. Studies evaluating the response of LPC to systemic chemotherapy have focused on histopathologic analyses of resected specimens, but such specimens are not available for patients who do not undergo resection. We previously showed that changes in tumor volume and CA 19-9 levels provide a clinical readout of histopathologic response to preoperative therapy. METHODS Our institutional database was searched for patients with LPC who were treated with first-line chemotherapy between January 2010 and December 2017 and did not undergo pancreatectomy. Radiographic response was measured using RECIST 1.1 and tumor volume. The volume of the primary tumor was compared between pretreatment and posttreatment images. The percentage change in tumor volume (%Δvol) was calculated as a percentage of the pretreatment volume. Serologic response was measured by comparing pretreatment and posttreatment CA 19-9 levels. We established 3 response groups by combining these metrics: (1) best responders with a decline in %Δvol in the top quartile and in CA 19-9, (2) nonresponders with an increase in %Δvol and in CA 19-9, and (3) other patients. RESULTS This study included 329 patients. Individually, %Δvol and change in CA 19-9 were associated with overall survival (OS) (P≤.1), but RECIST 1.1 was not. In all, 73 patients (22%) were best responders, 42 (13%) were nonresponders, and there were 214 (65%) others. Best responders lived significantly longer than nonresponders and others (median OS, 24 vs 12 vs 17 months, respectively; P<.01). A multivariable model adjusting for type of chemotherapy regimen, number of chemotherapy doses, and receipt of radiotherapy showed that best responders had longer OS than did the other cohorts (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.58 for best responders, and HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.83 for others). CONCLUSIONS Changes in tumor volume and serum levels of CA 19-9-but not RECIST 1.1-represent reliable metrics of response to systemic chemotherapy. They can be used to counsel patients and families on survival expectations even if pancreatectomy is not performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin A Hester
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Giampaolo Perri
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; and
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brandon Smaglo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael J Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
DiPeri TP, Newhook TE, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Bruno ML, Chun YS, Tran Cao HS, Lee JE, Vauthey JN, Tzeng CWD. Prospective Implementation of Standardized Post-Hepatectomy Care Pathways to Reduce Opioid Prescription Volume after Inpatient Surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 235:41-48. [PMID: 35703961 PMCID: PMC9205619 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among the goals of prospectively implemented post-hepatectomy care pathways was a focus on patient-centric opioid reduction. We sought to evaluate the impact of pathway implementation on opioid volumes in the last 24-hour period and discharge prescriptions. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective cohort study comparing a prospective cohort ("POST," September 2019 through February 2020) treated after pathway implementation to a historical cohort of hepatectomy patients ("PRE," March 2016 through December 2017) before our 2018 departmental opioid reduction efforts. Opioid volumes in the last 24 hours and prescribed at discharge were converted to oral morphine equivalents (OME) and compared between cohorts. RESULTS There were 276 PRE and 100 POST patients. There was a similar proportion of major (PRE-34.1% vs POST-40%) and minimally invasive hepatectomies (PRE-19.9% vs POST-11%, p = 0.122). Implementation was associated with a shorter length of stay (median 5 d PRE vs 4 d POST, p < 0.001). Standardized opioid weaning was associated with a lower median last 24-hour OME (20 mg PRE vs 10 mg POST, p = 0.001). Using a standardized discharge calculation, median discharge OME were lower (200 mg PRE vs 50 mg POST, p < 0.001). More POST patients were discharged opioid-free (6.9% PRE vs 21% POST, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of post-hepatectomy care pathways was associated with a 50% reduction in last 24-hour OME, which, combined with a standardized discharge calculation, was associated with an overall 75% reduction in discharge opioid volumes and tripled opioid-free discharges. These data suggest that no-cost, reproducible pathways can be considered in abdominal operations with similar incisions/length of stay to decrease variation in opioid dosing while prioritizing patient-centric opioid needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P DiPeri
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
DiPeri TP, Newhook TE, Day RW, Chiang YJ, Dewhurst WL, Arvide EM, Bruno ML, Scally CP, Roland CL, Katz MH, Vauthey JN, Chang GJ, Badgwell BD, Perrier ND, Grubbs EG, Lee JE, Tzeng CWD. A prospective feasibility study evaluating the 5x-multiplier to standardize discharge prescriptions in cancer surgery patients. Surg Open Sci 2022; 9:51-57. [PMID: 35663797 PMCID: PMC9161107 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We designed a prospective feasibility study to assess the 5x-multiplier (5x) calculation (eg, 3 pills in last 24 hours × 5 = 15) to standardize discharge opioid prescriptions compared to usual care. Methods Faculty-based surgical teams volunteered for either 5x or usual care arms. Patients undergoing inpatient (≥ 48 hours) surgery and discharged by surgical teams were included. The primary end point was discharge oral morphine equivalents. Secondary end points were opioid-free discharges and 30-day refill rates. Results Median last 24-hour oral morphine equivalents was similar between arms (7.5 mg 5x vs 10 mg usual care, P = .830). Median discharge oral morphine equivalents were less in the 5x arm (50 mg 5x vs 75 mg usual care, P < .001). Opioid-free discharges included 33.5% 5x vs 18.0% usual care arm patients (P < .001). Thirty-day refill rates were similar (15.3% 5x vs 16.5% usual care, P = .742). Conclusion The 5x-multiplier was associated with reduced opioid prescriptions without increased refills and can be feasibly implemented across a diverse surgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P. DiPeri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Timothy E. Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ryan W. Day
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Whitney L. Dewhurst
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elsa M. Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Morgan L. Bruno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christopher P. Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christina L. Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew H.G. Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - George J. Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brian D. Badgwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nancy D. Perrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth G. Grubbs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vellano CP, White MG, Andrews MC, Chelvanambi M, Witt RG, Daniele JR, Titus M, McQuade JL, Conforti F, Burton EM, Lastrapes MJ, Ologun G, Cogdill AP, Morad G, Prieto P, Lazar AJ, Chu Y, Han G, Khan MAW, Helmink B, Davies MA, Amaria RN, Kovacs JJ, Woodman SE, Patel S, Hwu P, Peoples M, Lee JE, Cooper ZA, Zhu H, Gao G, Banerjee H, Lau M, Gershenwald JE, Lucci A, Keung EZ, Ross MI, Pala L, Pagan E, Segura RL, Liu Q, Borthwick MS, Lau E, Yates MS, Westin SN, Wani K, Tetzlaff MT, Haydu LE, Mahendra M, Ma X, Logothetis C, Kulstad Z, Johnson S, Hudgens CW, Feng N, Federico L, Long GV, Futreal PA, Arur S, Tawbi HA, Moran AE, Wang L, Heffernan TP, Marszalek JR, Wargo JA. Androgen receptor blockade promotes response to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy. Nature 2022; 606:797-803. [PMID: 35705814 PMCID: PMC10071594 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04833-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Treatment with therapy targeting BRAF and MEK (BRAF/MEK) has revolutionized care in melanoma and other cancers; however, therapeutic resistance is common and innovative treatment strategies are needed1,2. Here we studied a group of patients with melanoma who were treated with neoadjuvant BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy ( NCT02231775 , n = 51) and observed significantly higher rates of major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumour at resection) and improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) in female versus male patients (MPR, 66% versus 14%, P = 0.001; RFS, 64% versus 32% at 2 years, P = 0.021). The findings were validated in several additional cohorts2-4 of patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma who were treated with BRAF- and/or MEK-targeted therapy (n = 664 patients in total), demonstrating improved progression-free survival and overall survival in female versus male patients in several of these studies. Studies in preclinical models demonstrated significantly impaired anti-tumour activity in male versus female mice after BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy (P = 0.006), with significantly higher expression of the androgen receptor in tumours of male and female BRAF/MEK-treated mice versus the control (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.0025). Pharmacological inhibition of androgen receptor signalling improved responses to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy in male and female mice (P = 0.018 and P = 0.003), whereas induction of androgen receptor signalling (through testosterone administration) was associated with a significantly impaired response to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy in male and female patients (P = 0.021 and P < 0.0001). Together, these results have important implications for therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Vellano
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael G White
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miles C Andrews
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Manoj Chelvanambi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Russell G Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph R Daniele
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark Titus
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fabio Conforti
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew J Lastrapes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gabriel Ologun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, Guthrie Courtland Medical Center, Courtland, NY, USA
| | - Alexandria P Cogdill
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Immunai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Golnaz Morad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter Prieto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yanshuo Chu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guangchun Han
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - M A Wadud Khan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Beth Helmink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Kovacs
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott E Woodman
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sapna Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michael Peoples
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zachary A Cooper
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Haifeng Zhu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guang Gao
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hiya Banerjee
- Clinical Development and Analytics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Mike Lau
- Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura Pala
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Pagan
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Rossana Lazcano Segura
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mikayla S Borthwick
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric Lau
- Department of Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Melinda S Yates
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Khalida Wani
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren E Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mikhila Mahendra
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - XiaoYan Ma
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zachary Kulstad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarah Johnson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Courtney W Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ningping Feng
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lorenzo Federico
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - P Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Swathi Arur
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy E Moran
- Cell, Development & Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy P Heffernan
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Joseph R Marszalek
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
DiPeri TP, Newhook TE, Tran Cao HS, Ikoma N, Dewhurst WL, Arvide EM, Bruno ML, Katz MHG, Vauthey JN, Lee JE, Tzeng CWD. Opioid Discharge Prescriptions After Inpatient Surgery: Risks of Rebound Refills by Length of Stay. J Surg Res 2022; 278:111-118. [PMID: 35597025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As inpatient stays become shorter, one concern with standardizing discharge opioid prescriptions is the potential risk of "rebound refills." We sought to compare opioid prescription refill rates and volumes for surgical patients discharged on postoperative day (POD) 2-3, 4-7, and 8+. METHODS In a prospective quality improvement protocol, faculty volunteered to use either a 5x-multiplier (5x) or usual care (UC) for discharge prescriptions after inpatient (≥48 h stay) surgery from Sep-Dec 2019. The 5x-multiplier is 5-times the patient's last 24-h opioid use (by oral morphine equivalents, OME). Cohorts were compared by POD of discharge: POD 2-3 ("SHORT"), POD 4-7 ("INTERMEDIATE"), and POD 8+ ("LONG"). The primary endpoint was 30-d refill rates. Secondary endpoints included 30-d refill OME and inpatient opioid weaning/discharge metrics. RESULTS From 22 faculty, 409 patients were included. When stratified by POD, 154 (37.7%) were discharged SHORT, 176 (43.0%) INTERMEDIATE, and 79 (19.3%) LONG. SHORT stay patients had a median last 24-h OME of 10 mg (versus 5 mg INTERMEDIATE, 5 mg LONG; P = 0.268), and a median discharge OME of 55 mg (versus 75 mg INTERMEDIATE, 100 mg LONG; P = 0.221). Patients with SHORT stays did not have higher refill rates (11.7% versus 18.2% INTERMEDIATE, 19.0% LONG; P = 0.193) or higher median refill OME (150 mg versus 300 mg INTERMEDAITE, 339 mg LONG; P = 0.154). CONCLUSIONS Despite concerns of increased refills, patients discharged by POD 2-3 were not associated with "rebound refills." A patient-centered 5x-multiplier standardization of discharge opioid prescriptions is feasible in all inpatient surgery patients, even those discharged following a short inpatient stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P DiPeri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Whitney L Dewhurst
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Morgan L Bruno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shirali AS, Zagzag J, Chiang YJ, Huang H, Zhang M, Habra MA, Grubbs EG, Fisher SB, Perrier ND, Lee JE, Graham PH. ASO Visual Abstract: Differences in the Clinicopathologic Behavior of Oncocytic Adrenocortical Neoplasms and Conventional Adrenocortical Carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol 2022. [PMID: 35552937 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11681-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya S Shirali
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - He Huang
- Department of Pathology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Miao Zhang
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohammed Amir Habra
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Grubbs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nancy D Perrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul H Graham
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Fukuda Y, Bustos MA, Cho SN, Roszik J, Ryu S, Lopez VM, Burks JK, Lee JE, Grimm EA, Hoon DSB, Ekmekcioglu S. Correction: Interplay between soluble CD74 and macrophage-migration inhibitory factor drives tumor growth and influences patient survival in melanoma. Cell Death Dis 2022; 13:422. [PMID: 35501311 PMCID: PMC9061713 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-04879-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
43
|
Shirali AS, Zagzag J, Chiang YJ, Huang H, Zhang M, Habra MA, Grubbs EG, Fisher SB, Perrier ND, Lee JE, Graham PH. Differences in Clinicopathologic Behavior of Oncocytic Adrenocortical Neoplasms and Conventional Adrenocortical Carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5555-5563. [PMID: 35499784 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11626-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncocytic adrenocortical neoplasms (OANs) are rare endocrine tumors that present as a spectrum from benign to malignant. The outcomes after surgical resection of the oncocytic variant of adrenocortical carcinoma remain poorly understood. We sought to characterize the clinicopathologic features of OAN and compare oncocytic adrenocortical carcinoma (OAC) with conventional adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult patients who underwent adrenalectomy for OAN or ACC between January 1990 and September 2020 were identified. Demographics, clinicopathologic factors, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, and cancer-related outcomes were reviewed. A matched cohort analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed between patients with OACs and those with ACCs. RESULTS Forty-one patients with OAN and 214 patients with ACC were included. The OAN cohort median age was 45.2 years [interquartile ratio (IQR) 38.5-54.0 years], and 61.0% were female. OANs were benign (n = 11), of uncertain malignant potential (UMP, n = 9), or OAC (n = 21). Disease recurrence occurred in 12 (57.1%) patients with OAC compared with 1 (11.1%) and 0 patients with UMP or benign OAN, respectively (p < 0.001). Seven (33.3%) patients with OAC died during follow-up compared with 0 patients with UMP or benign OAN (p = 0.020). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis found no difference in DFS between ACC and OAC groups before (p = 0.218) and after 2:1 matching (p = 0.417). Overall survival was shorter for patients who had ACC compared with those who had OAC (p = 0.031), but the difference was not evident with matched analysis (p = 0.200). CONCLUSIONS OAN presents as a spectrum from benign indolent tumors to aggressive carcinomas. OACs demonstrate similar clinicopathologic behavior and recurrence-free and overall survival when matched to conventional ACCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya S Shirali
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - He Huang
- Department of Pathology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Miao Zhang
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mouhammed Amir Habra
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Grubbs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nancy D Perrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul H Graham
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nishioka Y, Paez-Arango N, Boettcher FO, Kawaguchi Y, Newhook TE, Chun YS, Tzeng CWD, Tran Cao HS, Lee JE, Vreeland TJ, Vauthey JN. Neither Surgical Margin Status nor Somatic Mutation Predicts Local Recurrence After R0-intent Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:791-801. [PMID: 34725784 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05173-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the associations of surgical margin status and somatic mutations with the incidence of local recurrence (LR) and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing R0-intent (microscopically negative margin) resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS Patients with CLM who underwent initial R0-intent resection and analysis of tumor tissue using next-generation sequencing during 2001-2018 were analyzed. Recurrences were classified as LR (at the resection margin), other intrahepatic recurrence, or extrahepatic recurrence. Predictors and survival effect of LR were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Of 552 patients analyzed, 415 (75%) had R0 resection (margin width ≥ 1.0 mm), and 38 (7%) had LR. LR incidence was not affected by surgical margin width. RAS/TP53 co-mutation was associated with increased risk of intrahepatic recurrence (67% vs. 49%; p < 0.001) and overall recurrence (p < 0.001). However, incidence of LR did not differ significantly by RAS/TP53, BRAF, SMAD4, or FBXW7 mutation. Extrahepatic disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; p = 0.034), > 8 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy (HR, 1.98; p = 0.033), tumor viability ≥ 50% (HR, 1.55; p = 0.007), RAS/TP53 co-mutation (HR, 1.69; p = 0.001), and SMAD4 mutation (HR, 2.44; p < 0.001) were independently associated with poor overall survival, but surgical margin status was not. CONCLUSIONS Although somatic mutations were associated with overall recurrence, neither surgical margin width nor somatic mutations affected LR risk after R0-intent hepatectomy for CLM. LR and prognosis were likely driven by individual tumor biology rather than surgical margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujiro Nishioka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Natalia Paez-Arango
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Federico Oppliger Boettcher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Timothy J Vreeland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cook JD, Khondker A, Lee JE. Conformational plasticity of the HIV-1 gp41 immunodominant region is recognized by multiple non-neutralizing antibodies. Commun Biol 2022; 5:291. [PMID: 35361878 PMCID: PMC8971491 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03235-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The early humoral immune response to acute HIV-1 infection is largely non-neutralizing. The principal target of these antibodies is the primary immunodominant region (PID) on the gp41 fusion protein. The PID is a highly conserved 15-residue region displayed on the surface of HIV-1 virions. In this study, we analyzed the humoral determinants of HIV-1 gp41 PID binding using biophysical, structural, and computational methods. In complex with a patient-derived near-germline antibody fragment, the PID motif adopts an elongated random coil, whereas the PID bound to affinity-matured Fab adopts a strand-turn-helix conformation. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that the PID is structurally plastic suggesting that the PID can form an ensemble of structural states recognized by various non-neutralizing antibodies, facilitating HIV-1 immunodominance observed in acute and chronic HIV-1 infections. An improved understanding of how the HIV-1 gp41 PID misdirects the early humoral response should guide the development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine. The 15-amino-acid primary immunodominant (PID) region on HIV-1 gp41 adopts an ensemble of conformational states. This conformational plasticity is suggested to misdirect the early humoral immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D Cook
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Adree Khondker
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Srougi V, Bancos I, Daher M, Lee JE, Graham PH, Karam JA, Henriquez A, Mckenzie TJ, Sada A, Bourdeau I, Poirier J, Vaidya A, Abbondanza T, Kiernan CM, Rao SN, Hamidi O, Sachithanandan N, Hoff AO, Chambo JL, Almeida MQ, Habra MA, Fragoso MCBV. Cytoreductive Surgery of the Primary Tumor in Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Impact on Patients' Survival. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107:964-971. [PMID: 34850915 PMCID: PMC9122637 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The role of cytoreduction of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To analyze the impact of cytoreductive surgery of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic ACC. DESIGN AND SETTING We performed a multicentric, retrospective paired cohort study comparing the overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic ACC who were treated either with cytoreductive surgery (CR group) or without cytoreductive surgery (no-CR group) of the primary tumor. Data were retrieved from 9 referral centers in the American-Australian-Asian Adrenal Alliance collaborative research group. PATIENTS Patients aged ≥18 years with metastatic ACC at initial presentation who were treated between January 1, 1995, and May 31, 2019. INTERVENTION Performance (or not) of cytoreductive surgery of the primary tumor. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES A propensity score match was done using age and the number of organs with metastasis (≤2 or >2). The main outcome was OS, determined from the date of diagnosis until death or until last follow-up for living patients. RESULTS Of 339 patients pooled, 239 were paired and included: 128 in the CR group and 111 in the no-CR group. The mean follow-up was 67 months. Patients in the no-CR group had greater risk of death than did patients in the CR group (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.18; 95% CI, 2.34-4.32). Independent predictors of survival included age (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03), hormone excess (HR = 2.56; 95% CI, 1.66-3.92), and local metastasis therapy (HR = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.47-0.65). CONCLUSION Cytoreductive surgery of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic ACC is associated with prolonged survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Srougi
- Division of Urology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Division of Urology, Hospital Moriah, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Irina Bancos
- Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Marilyne Daher
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul H Graham
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Travis J Mckenzie
- Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alaa Sada
- Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Isabelle Bourdeau
- Division of Endocrinology and Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jonathan Poirier
- Division of Endocrinology and Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Anand Vaidya
- Center for Adrenal Disorders, Division of Endocrinology Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tiffany Abbondanza
- Center for Adrenal Disorders, Division of Endocrinology Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Colleen M Kiernan
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sarika N Rao
- Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Oksana Hamidi
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Nirupa Sachithanandan
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ana O Hoff
- Unidade de Suprarrenal, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jose L Chambo
- Division of Urology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Madson Q Almeida
- Unidade de Suprarrenal, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mouhammed Amir Habra
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria C B V Fragoso
- Unidade de Suprarrenal, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Witt RG, Cope B, Chiang YJ, Newhook T, Lillemoe H, Tzeng CWD, Chen IB, Fisher SB, Lucci A, Wargo JA, Lee JE, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Robinson J, Keung EZ. Utilization and evolving prescribing practice of opioid and non-opioid analgesics in patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy. J Surg Oncol 2022; 125:719-729. [PMID: 34904258 PMCID: PMC9108995 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Opioids are commonly prescribed following surgery and can lead to persistent opioid use. We assessed changes in prescribing practices following an opioid education initiative for patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy. METHODS A single-institution retrospective study of all eligible patients (3/2016-3/2020) was performed. RESULTS Indications for lymphadenectomy in 328 patients were metastatic melanoma (84%), squamous cell carcinoma (10%), and Merkel cell carcinoma (5%). At discharge, non-opioid analgesics were increasingly utilized over the 4-year study period, with dramatic increases after education initiatives (32%, 42%, 59%, and 79% of pts, respectively each year; p < 0.001). Median oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) prescribed also decreased dramatically starting in year 3 (250, 238, 150, and 100 mg, respectively; p < 0.001). Patients discharged with 200 mg OMEs were less likely to also be discharged with non-opioid analgesics (40% vs. 64%. respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Analgesic prescribing practices following lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy improved significantly over a 4-year period, with use of non-opioids more than doubling and a 60% reduction in median OME. Opportunities exist to further increase non-opioid use and decrease opioid dissemination after lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell G. Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brandon Cope
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Timothy Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Heather Lillemoe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Iris B. Chen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sarah B. Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer A. Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Merrick I. Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Justine Robinson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Emily Z. Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vreeland TJ, Bohan PMK, Newhook TE, Allen CJ, Prakash LR, Maxwell JE, Ikoma N, Kim MP, Lee JE, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Contemporary Assessment of Need for Palliative Bypass After Aborted Pancreatoduodenectomy Following Neoadjuvant Therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:352-359. [PMID: 35064457 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05224-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Planned pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can be aborted due to intraoperative findings. There is little guidance regarding the need for prophylactic bypass following an aborted PD to prevent symptomatic biliary obstruction or gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) postoperatively. The aim of this study was to characterize postoperative interventions and postsurgical survival in patients following aborted PD. METHODS Patients with PDAC treated with neoadjuvant therapy and staging laparoscopy prior to planned PD between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed for aborted PDs. Data on postoperative biliary obstruction, GOO, procedural intervention, and postsurgical survival were analyzed. RESULTS Of 271 planned PDs, 47 (17.3%) were aborted. Thirty-six patients had ≥ 2 months of follow-up data and were included. Six patients underwent hepaticojejunostomy and nine patients underwent gastrojejunostomy at the time of the aborted PD. Sixteen of 30 patients (53%) without a surgical biliary bypass required endoscopic intervention, but none required palliative surgery. Ten of 27 patients (37%) without an operative gastrojejunostomy required intervention, but none required palliative surgery. Endoscopic or percutaneous therapy was required to treat 13/16 (81%) patients who presented with postoperative biliary obstructions and 6/10 (60%) of GOOs. Median survival following aborted PD was 13.3 months (CI 8.9-17.7). There were no differences in survival when comparing patients who developed a biliary obstruction (p = 0.92) or GOO (p = 0.90) to asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS Following aborted PD, patients commonly develop obstructive symptoms. However, these symptoms can generally be managed without surgical intervention. In asymptomatic patients, preemptive surgical bypasses are not required at the time of aborted PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Vreeland
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr. Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA.
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Phillip M Kemp Bohan
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr. Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Casey J Allen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Spencer CN, McQuade JL, Gopalakrishnan V, McCulloch JA, Vetizou M, Cogdill AP, Khan AW, Zhang X, White MG, Peterson CB, Wong MC, Morad G, Rodgers T, Badger JH, Helmink BA, Andrews MC, Rodrigues RR, Morgun A, Kim YS, Roszik J, Hoffman KL, Zheng J, Zhou Y, Medik YB, Kahn LM, Johnson S, Hudgens CW, Wani K, Gaudreau PO, Harris AL, Jamal MA, Baruch EN, Perez-Guijarro E, Day CP, Merlino G, Pazdrak B, Lochmann BS, Szczepaniak-Sloane RA, Arora R, Anderson J, Zobniw CM, Posada E, Sirmans E, Simon J, Haydu LE, Burton EM, Wang L, Dang M, Clise-Dwyer K, Schneider S, Chapman T, Anang NAAS, Duncan S, Toker J, Malke JC, Glitza IC, Amaria RN, Tawbi HA, Diab A, Wong MK, Patel SP, Woodman SE, Davies MA, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Lee JE, Hwu P, Jensen V, Samuels Y, Straussman R, Ajami NJ, Nelson KC, Nezi L, Petrosino JF, Futreal PA, Lazar AJ, Hu J, Jenq RR, Tetzlaff MT, Yan Y, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C, Sharma P, Watowich SS, Allison JP, Cohen L, Trinchieri G, Daniel CR, Wargo JA. Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response. Science 2021; 374:1632-1640. [PMID: 34941392 PMCID: PMC8970537 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz7015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 318] [Impact Index Per Article: 106.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Gut bacteria modulate the response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) treatment in cancer, but the effect of diet and supplements on this interaction is not well studied. We assessed fecal microbiota profiles, dietary habits, and commercially available probiotic supplement use in melanoma patients and performed parallel preclinical studies. Higher dietary fiber was associated with significantly improved progression-free survival in 128 patients on ICB, with the most pronounced benefit observed in patients with sufficient dietary fiber intake and no probiotic use. Findings were recapitulated in preclinical models, which demonstrated impaired treatment response to anti–programmed cell death 1 (anti–PD-1)–based therapy in mice receiving a low-fiber diet or probiotics, with a lower frequency of interferon-γ–positive cytotoxic T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Together, these data have clinical implications for patients receiving ICB for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine N. Spencer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jennifer L. McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - John A. McCulloch
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Marie Vetizou
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Alexandria P. Cogdill
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - A. Wadud Khan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Xiaotao Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael G. White
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Christine B. Peterson
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Matthew C. Wong
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Golnaz Morad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Theresa Rodgers
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jonathan H. Badger
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Beth A. Helmink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Miles C. Andrews
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Richard R. Rodrigues
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, and Microbiome and Genetics Core, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA
| | - Andrey Morgun
- Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
| | - Young S. Kim
- Nutritional Science Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, NCI, NIH, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Jason Roszik
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kristi L. Hoffman
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jiali Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yifan Zhou
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yusra B. Medik
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Laura M. Kahn
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- MD Anderson University of Texas Health Graduate School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah Johnson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Courtney W. Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Khalida Wani
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group and Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Angela L. Harris
- Center for Co-Clinical Trials, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mohamed A. Jamal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Erez N. Baruch
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eva Perez-Guijarro
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Chi-Ping Day
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Glenn Merlino
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Barbara Pazdrak
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Brooke S. Lochmann
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Reetakshi Arora
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jaime Anderson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chrystia M. Zobniw
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eliza Posada
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Elizabeth Sirmans
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Julie Simon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lauren E. Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Elizabeth M. Burton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Minghao Dang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Karen Clise-Dwyer
- Advanced Cytometry and Sorting Facility at South Campus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Hematopoietic Biology and Malignancy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah Schneider
- Advanced Cytometry and Sorting Facility at South Campus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Thomas Chapman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Nana-Ama A. S. Anang
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sheila Duncan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joseph Toker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Jared C. Malke
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Isabella C. Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rodabe N. Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hussein A. Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael K. Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sapna P. Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Scott E. Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael A. Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Merrick I. Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Vanessa Jensen
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yardena Samuels
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
| | - Ravid Straussman
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
| | - Nadim J. Ajami
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kelly C. Nelson
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Luigi Nezi
- Dipartimento di Oncologia Sperimentale, Instituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, P.I. 08691440153, Italy
| | - Joseph F. Petrosino
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - P. Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- MD Anderson University of Texas Health Graduate School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jianhua Hu
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Robert R. Jenq
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Stem Cell Transplant, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael T. Tetzlaff
- Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, Dermatopathology and Oral Pathology Unit, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Yan Yan
- Department of Biostatistics and the Harvard T.H. Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Wendy S. Garrett
- Department of Molecular Metabolism, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Curtis Huttenhower
- Department of Biostatistics and the Harvard T.H. Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
- Harvard Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Stephanie S. Watowich
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - James P. Allison
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Giorgio Trinchieri
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Carrie R. Daniel
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Serrão VHB, Lee JE. Detecting in-solution conformational changes in viral fusogens using tryptophan-induced fluorescence quenching. STAR Protoc 2021; 2:100994. [PMID: 34934961 PMCID: PMC8654978 DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Dynamic monitoring of protein conformational changes is necessary to fully understand many biological processes. For example, viral entry and membrane fusion require rearrangement of its viral glycoprotein. We present a step-by-step protocol for site-specific bimane labeling of the influenza-C fusogen to map proximity and conformational movements using tryptophan-induced fluorescence quenching. This protocol is adaptable for other proteins and for protein-protein interaction detection. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Serrão et al., 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vitor Hugo B. Serrão
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|