The prognostic value of baseline and early variations of peripheral blood inflammatory ratios and their cellular components in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: The Δ-Meet-URO analysis

Background

Treatment choice for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients is still based on baseline clinical and laboratory factors.

Methods

By a pre-specified analysis of the Meet-URO 15 multicentric retrospective study enrolling 571 pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab, baseline and early dynamic variations (Δ) of neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet absolute cell counts (ACC) and their inflammatory ratios (IR) were evaluated alongside their association with the best disease response and overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariable analyses on OS and PFS between baseline and Δ ACC and IR values were investigated with receiving operating curves-based cut-offs.

Results

The analysis included 422 mRCC patients. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) increased over time due to consistent neutrophil increase (p < 0.001). Higher baseline platelets (p = 0.044) and lower lymphocytes (p = 0.018), increasing neutrophil Δ (p for time-group interaction <0.001), higher baseline IR values (NLR: p = 0.012, SII: p = 0.003, PLR: p = 0.003), increasing NLR and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) (i.e., NLR x platelets) Δ (p for interaction time-group = 0.0053 and 0.0435, respectively) were associated with disease progression. OS and PFS were significantly shorter in patients with baseline lower lymphocytes (p < 0.001 for both) and higher platelets (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively) alongside early neutrophils Δ (p = 0.046 and p = 0.033, respectively). Early neutrophils and NLR Δ were independent prognostic factors for both OS (p = 0.014 and p = 0.011, respectively) and PFS (p = 0.023 and p = 0.001, respectively), alongside baseline NLR (p < 0.001 for both) and other known prognostic variables.

Conclusions

Early neutrophils and NLR Δ may represent new dynamic prognostic factors with clinical utility for on-treatment decisions.

RNA-seq and Mitochondrial DNA Analysis of Adrenal Gland Metastatic Tissue in a Patient with Renal Cell Carcinoma

This study aimed to clarify whether genetic mutations participate in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastasis to the adrenal gland (AG). Our study analyzed whole mitochondrial gene and ribonucleic acid sequencing (RNA-seq) data from a male patient in his 60s with metastatic RCC. We confirmed common mutation sites in the mitochondrial gene and carried out Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis using RNA-seq data for RCC and adrenal carcinoma. Furthermore, we confirmed the common mutation sites of mitochondrial genes in which the T3394Y (p.H30Y) site transitioned from histidine (His.; H) to tyrosine (Tyr.; Y) in the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (ND1) gene. The R11,807G (p.T350A) site transitioned from threonine (Thr.; T) to alanine (Ala.; A). Additionally, the G15,438R or A (p.G231D) site transitioned from glycine (Gly.; G) to aspartic acid (Asp.; D) in cytochrome b (CYTB). Furthermore, pathway analysis, using RNA-seq, confirmed the common mutant pathway between RCC and adrenal carcinoma as cytokine–cytokine receptor (CCR) interaction. Confirmation of the original mutation sites suggests that transfer to AG may be related to the CCR interaction. Thus, during metastasis to the AG, mitochondria DNA mutation may represent the initial origin of the metastasis, followed by the likely mutation of the nuclear genes.

Long progression-free survival with cabozantinib in a heavily pretreated patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a case report

Renal cell carcinoma accounts for 3% of all tumors. Over the last decades, the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved owing to the approval of several drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) does not exceed 8 months with the available drugs in pretreated patients with mRCC. We present a case of a patient with a long-term response to fourth-line treatment with cabozantinib. Our patient obtained a PFS of 33 months, which is much higher than that reported in literature.

Acquired Hypothyroidism in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

PURPOSE

We analyze a number of studies that describe the relationship between the onset of hypothyroidism and the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with TKIs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Targeted therapies are currently considered as the first-line treatment for patients with mRCC. The occurrence of hypothyroidism in the treatment of mRCC with TKIs is a major side effect. A comprehensive search was performed in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Institute for Scientific Information, and CKNI. The following keywords and descriptors were used during the search and were combined in a number of sequences in English and Chinese languages: protein kinase inhibitors (including sunitinib, pazopanib, tivozanib, cabozantinib, axitinib, sorafenib), hypothyroidism and renal cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

Scholars have studied the clinical relationship between hypothyroidism and TKI treatment and its molecular biology mechanism. Most studies hold that hypothyroidism occurring during TKI therapy may serve as potential biomarkers of response and efficacy of treatment, but there is no consensus on this point.

CONCLUSION

The mechanism of hypothyroidism occurring is still unclear. Therefore, more studies are needed to clarify whether better outcomes are associated with TKI-induced hypothyroidism in mRCC patients, helping to maximize the treatment outcome of mRCC patients.

Preoperative CT Radiomics Predicting the SSIGN Risk Groups in Patients With Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Development and Multicenter Validation

Objective: The stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score can facilitate the assessment of tumor aggressiveness and the personal management for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, this score is only available after the postoperative pathological evaluation. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a CT radiomic signature for the preoperative prediction of SSIGN risk groups in patients with ccRCC in multicenters.

Methods: In total, 330 patients with ccRCC from three centers were classified into the training, external validation 1, and external validation 2 cohorts. Through consistent analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, a radiomic signature was developed to predict the SSIGN low-risk group (scores 0–3) and intermediate- to high-risk group (score ≥ 4). An image feature model was developed according to the independent image features, and a fusion model was constructed integrating the radiomic signature and the independent image features. Furthermore, the predictive performance of the above models for the SSIGN risk groups was evaluated with regard to their discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

Results: A radiomic signature consisting of sixteen relevant features from the nephrographic phase CT images achieved a good calibration (all Hosmer–Lemeshow p > 0.05) and favorable prediction efficacy in the training cohort [area under the curve (AUC): 0.940, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.884–0.973] and in the external validation cohorts (AUC: 0.876, 95% CI: 0.811–0.942; AUC: 0.928, 95% CI: 0.844–0.975, respectively). The radiomic signature performed better than the image feature model constructed by intra-tumoral vessels (all p < 0.05) and showed similar performance with the fusion model integrating radiomic signature and intra-tumoral vessels (all p > 0.05) in terms of the discrimination in all cohorts. Moreover, the decision curve analysis verified the clinical utility of the radiomic signature in both external cohorts.

Conclusion: Radiomic signature could be used as a promising non-invasive tool to predict SSIGN risk groups and to facilitate preoperative clinical decision-making for patients with ccRCC.

TBOPP enhances the anticancer effect of cisplatin by inhibiting DOCK1 in renal cell carcinoma

The treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with chemotherapy remains a challenge; therefore, improving the knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying RCC chemoresistance and developing novel therapeutic strategies is important. Dedicator of cytokinesis 1 (DOCK1), the first member of the DOCK family to be discovered, displays various roles during tumorigenesis; however, its role during RCC progression is not completely understood. Therefore, the present study aimed to clarify the function of DOCK1 and 1-[2-(3′-(trifluoromethyl)-(1,1′-biphenyl)-4-yl)-2-oxoethyl]-5-pyrrolidinylsulfonyl-2 (1H)-pyridone (TBOPP), a DOCK1-sensitive inhibitor, during RCC development and chemoresistance. The results of CCK-8 and EdU assay indicated that TBOPP decreased RCC cell viability and proliferation compared with the control group, and sensitized RCC cells to cisplatin. Moreover, RCC cells with high DOCK1 expression levels displayed increased resistance to cisplatin, whereas DOCK1 knockdown enhanced the lethal effects of cisplatin on RCC cells. Furthermore, the results determined by western blotting, CCK-8 and cell apoptosis assay indicated that TBOPP effectively reduced DOCK1 expression levels compared with the control group, and the TBOPP-mediated cisplatin sensitizing effect was mediated by DOCK1 inhibition. The present study suggests that DOCK1 plays a vital role in RCC cell chemoresistance to cisplatin; therefore, TBOPP may serve as a novel therapeutic agent for RCC chemoresistance.

Activity of lenvatinib plus everolimus combination in a heavily pretreated patient with papillary renal cell carcinoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) represents the second most common histologic subtype of renal cell carcinoma and comprises 2 subtypes. Prognosis for type 2 is associated with poor clinical outcome. Current guidelines are based on phase II trials, phase III trials in patients with clear cell histology, or retrospective data.

CASE DESCRIPTION

To our knowledge, we describe for the first time a case of a patient with heavily pretreated metastatic pRCC who benefited from the combination of lenvatinib plus everolimus for more than 2 years.

CONCLUSION

According to immunohistologic and biological findings in our patient both on primary tumor and liver metastasis, we hypothesize that selected patients with metastatic pRCC, progressed to standard/available treatments (including angiogenic drugs, mTOR inhibitors, and immunotherapy) and dissociated response to everolimus, could benefit from adding lenvatinib to everolimus.

Pancreatic resections for metastases: A twenty-year experience from a tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

Literature data about pancreatic resections for metastases are limited to small series, so that the role of surgery in this setting remains unclear. We herein report our experience from a tertiary care center, analyzing the outcomes of patients who underwent pancreatic resections for metastases and discussing the role of surgical resection in their management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1999 to January 2019, 26 patients underwent pancreatic resections for metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC-group) or other primitive tumors (non-RCC-group). Details regarding pre-, intra-, post-operative course, and follow-up, prospectively collected in a database of pancreatic resection, were retrospectively analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

RCC-group was composed of 21 patients, non-RCC-group of 5 patients. RCC-group presented a longer disease-free interval: 96.4 vs. 5.4 months (p < 0.001). In 9/21 patients (42.9%) of RCC-group the surgical resection of other organs or vascular structures was performed, while in non-RCC-group pancreatic resection alone was performed in all cases, p = 0.070. No local recurrence was reported in all cases. The systemic recurrence rate was 42.9% (9/21 patients) in RCC-group and 80% (4/5 patients) in non-RCC-group, p = 0.135. RCC-group presented a longer DFS and OS: 107.5 vs. 25.2 months (p = 0.002), and 109.1 vs. 36.2 months (p = 0.016), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical pancreatic resection may confer a survival benefit for RCC metastases, while for other primitive tumors it should be applied more selectively. For RCC pancreatic metastases, an aggressive surgical approach, even in patient with locally advanced tumors, or associated extra-pancreatic localizations, or recurrent metastases should be taken in consideration.