Cisplatinum-Based Alternating Non-Cross-Resistant Chemotherapy as a First-Line Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer. A Phase II Study

Impact of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality

The degree to which observed reductions in breast cancer mortality is attributable to screening mammography has become increasingly controversial. We examined this issue with three fundamentally different approaches: (i) Chronology--the temporal relationship of the onset of breast cancer mortality decline and the national implementation of screening mammography; (ii) Magnitude--the degree to which breast cancer mortality declined relative to the amount (penetration) of screening mammography; (iii) Analogy--the pattern of mortality rate reductions of other cancers for which population screening is not conducted. Chronology and magnitude were assessed with data from Europe and North America, with three methods applied to magnitude. A comparison of eight countries in Europe and North America does not demonstrate a correlation between the penetration of national screening and either the chronology or magnitude of national breast cancer mortality reduction. In the United States, the magnitude of the mortality decline is greater in the unscreened, younger women than in the screened population and regional variation in the rate of breast cancer mortality reduction is not correlated with screening penetrance, either as self-reported or by the magnitude of screening-induced increase in early-stage disease. Analogy analysis of United States data identifies 14 other cancers with a similar distinct onset of mortality reduction for which screening is not performed. These five lines of evidence from three different approaches and additional observations discussed do not support the hypothesis that mammography screening is a primary reason for the breast cancer mortality reduction in Europe and North America.

Is metastatic breast cancer, refractory to usual therapy, curable?

Breast cancer with metastatic disease is presently incurable. Significantly shorter survival rates are seen in premenopausal women despite usual therapies when compared to survival rates in older women. Median survival rates of 24-30 months are documented in large-scale prospective clinical trials of previously untreated women with metastatic breast cancer regardless of the protocol employed (chemotherapy, hormone therapy). High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell rescue (bone marrow or peripheral blood) is associated with significant response and possibly improved survival in chemosensitive patients with metastatic disease without visceral metastases though with significant toxicities and cost (median survival rate of 20 months). Patients with refractory disease have dismal results regardless of therapy (median survival rates of 8-9 months in a number of prospective trials with or without stem cell rescue). The use of alpha-interferon in such patients has not improved response. Whole body hyperthermia is of benefit in the presence of liver metastases although median survival rate is in the range of 12 months. New treatment approaches with curative intent are clearly required. We report fifty-nine patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to common therapies who were treated with whole body hyperthermia (40 degrees C) with low dose chemotherapy and immunomodulation: five presented with brain metastases; 13 with multiple bone metastases; 8 with liver metastases; 10 with lung metastases; and 23 with multiple soft tissue metastases. Fifteen were premenopausal; 44 postmenopausal. Twenty-three achieved complete remission. Fourteen have been sustained with patients remaining alive from 17-80 months (median, 40 months). Nine failed after 20-40 months of being disease-free (mean, 32 months).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)