Vasopressin and shock

Adjuncts to Resuscitation

Damage control resuscitation has been increasingly adopted and practiced over the last decade. The concepts used are not new to this era of medicine but are novel in combination. This chapter will focus on adjuncts to damage control resuscitation (DCR) including massive transfusion protocols, the “other” tenets of damage control resuscitation, hypertonic saline, tranexamic acid, pharmacologic resuscitation, Factor VIIa, and prothrombin complex, and viscoelastic testing.

Copeptin: a blood test marker of syncope

AIMS

Copeptin (CPT) is regarded as a stress hormone, and as a novel marker of acute disease, and it has never been tested for a role in diagnosing syncope. The main objectives of the study were to measure CPT in patients suffering from syncope, to determine its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, and compare it with that in patients with falls and mild trauma. The secondary objective was to determine whether different types of syncope correlate with different levels of CPT.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients suffering from syncope and 51 suffering from falls without syncope were included in this study. Patients with a diagnosis of acute comorbidity were excluded. The diagnostic work was in accordance with the Guidelines of the European Cardiology Society. The level of CPT was measured in each patient evaluating the mean values in syncope vs. falls and in the different syncope type and the values over or under the normal threshold.

RESULTS

Of the 51 patients with syncope, 44 had abnormal and 7 normal CPT levels. Of the 51 patients with falls, 47 had normal and 4 abnormal levels of CPT. There was no difference in mean CPT levels in patients with different types of syncope. There was no correlation between levels of CPT and age or sex. There was a relationship between normal CPT levels and falls.

CONCLUSION

Copeptin is an efficient marker of syncope. It is useful for confirming or ruling out a diagnosis of syncope in patients who are unable to provide a definite history or when the event is unwitnessed.

Vasopressin for the treatment of neonatal hypotension

Vasopressin (pitressin), also known as arginine vasopressin (AVP), is an antidiuretic hormone formed in the hypothalamus and secreted from the posterior pituitary gland. Various forms of exogenous vasopressin exist and have been used in neonates to treat conditions such as diabetes insipidus. Vasopressin has also been studied on a limited basis for use in the treatment of catecholamine-resistant hypotension in vasodilatory shock. Hypotension is a significant problem resulting in increased morbidity in preterm, septic, and postsurgical neonates. This article will discuss the role of vasopressin and its use as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of hypotension in the neonate.

Terlipressin in brain-death donors

BACKGROUND

Metabolic management of brain-death organ donors includes correction of the hormonal perturbations that occur after cerebral death and impair circulatory function. Vasopressin is a hormone secreted by the posterior pituitary gland, which contributes to maintain systemic blood pressure by regulating urine secretion and small arteriole tonus. During brain death, the pituitary gland is damaged and hormone secretion rapidly ceases. Low-dose vasopressin increases systemic blood pressure and decreases the need for catecholamines in brain-dead organ donors but it is not available in many countries. Terlipressin is a synthetic analog of vasopressin characterized by greater selectivity for the V1 receptor than vasopressin. To date, the efficacy of terlipressin as a pressor agent in humans has been reported in a few studies.

METHOD

Pharmacology and literature about the use of terlipressin in shock and in particularly in neurogenic shock following brain death is summarized and our personal experience is reported.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Terlipressin is helpful in controlling severe hypotension; its use allowed to reduce the infusion rate of norepinephrine about 50% in two of three brain-death organ donors, but there are not yet enough data to define its therapeutic range and incidence of collateral effects on the grafts.

A human vascular model based on microdialysis for the assessment of the vasoconstrictive dose-response effects of norepinephrine and vasopressin in skin

OBJECTIVE

Microdialysis enables drug delivery in the skin and simultaneous measurement of their effects. The present study aimed to evaluate dose-dependent changes in blood flow and metabolism during microdialysis of norepinephrine and vasopressin.

METHODS

We investigated whether increasing concentrations of norepinephrine (NE, 1.8-59 μmol/L) and vasopressin (VP, 1-100 nmol/L), delivered sequentially in one catheter or simultaneously through four catheters, yield dose-dependent changes in blood flow (as measured using urea clearance) and metabolism (glucose and lactate).

RESULTS

We found a significant dose-dependent vasoconstriction with both drugs. Responses were characterized by a sigmoid dose response model. Urea in the dialysate increased from a baseline of 7.9 ± 1.7 to 10.9 ± 0.9 mmol/L for the highest concentration of NE (p < 0.001) and from 8.1 ± 1.4 to 10.0 ± 1.7 mmol/L for the highest concentration of VP (p = 0.037). Glucose decreased from 2.3 ± 0.7 to 0.41 ± 0.18 mmol/L for NE (p = 0.001) and from 2.7 ± 0.6 to 1.3 ± 0.5 mmol/L for VP (p < 0.001). Lactate increased from 1.1 ± 0.4 to 2.6 ± 0.5 mmol/L for NE (p = 0.005) and from 1.1 ± 0.4 to 2.6 ± 0.5 mmol/L for VP (p = 0.008). There were no significant differences between responses from a single catheter and from those obtained simultaneously using multiple catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

Microdialysis in the skin, either with a single catheter or using multiple catheters, offers a useful tool for studying dose response effects of vasoactive drugs on local blood flow and metabolism without inducing any systemic effects.

Vasopressin for hemorrhagic shock management: revisiting the potential value in civilian and combat casualty care

The evolution of trauma care is driven by a synergistic relationship between civilian and military medical systems. Although the characteristics of civilian injuries differ from those encountered on the battlefield, the pathophysiologic process of dying is the same and dominated by exsanguination and central nervous trauma. As such, therapies that interfere with the physiologic ability to compensate hemorrhage may play a key role to buy time until hemostatic surgery can be initiated. From a variety of remedies with the potential to prolong the compensation phase or to reverse the decompensation phase of shock, arginine vasopressin (AVP) is one of the most promising and best-evaluated drugs. Animal studies and various case report series provide some evidence that AVP may improve blood pressure even when conventional therapies fail, thus preventing hypovolemic cardiac arrest and enabling resuscitation from fatal hemorrhage. On the basis of this civilian experience, it seems reasonable to consider AVP for hypotensive resuscitation in the austere, resource-constrained battlefield environment. However, the significance of AVP as a rescue medication for life-threatening hemorrhage has yet to be proven.

Comparison of Treatment Modalities for Hemorrhagic Shock

Allogeneic blood resuscitation is the treatment of choice for hemorrhagic shock. When blood is unavailable, plasma expanders, including crystalloids, colloids, and blood substitutes, may be used. Another treatment modality is vasopressin, a vasoconstrictor administered to redistribute blood flow, increase venous return, and maintain adequate cardiac output. While much information exists on systemic function and oxygenation characteristics following treatment with these resuscitants, data on their effects on the microcirculation and correlation of real-time microvascular changes with changes in systemic function and oxygenation in the same animal are lacking. In this study, real-time microvascular changes during hemorrhagic shock treatment were correlated with systemic function and oxygenation changes in a canine hemorrhagic shock model (50-55% total blood loss with a MAP of 45-50 mmHg as a clinical criterion). Following splenectomy and hemorrhage, the dogs were assigned to five resuscitation groups: autologous/shed blood, hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier/Oxyglobin, crystalloid/saline, colloid/Hespan (6% hetastarch), and vasopressin. Systemic function and oxygenation changes were continuously monitored and periodically measured (during various phases of the study) using standard operating room protocols. Computer-assisted intravital video-microscopy was used to objectively analyze and quantify real-time microvascular changes (diameter, red-cell velocity) in the conjunctival microcirculation. Measurements were made during pre-hemorrhagic (baseline), post-hemorrhagic (pre-resuscitation), and post-resuscitation phases of the study. Pre-hemorrhagic microvascular variables were similar in all dogs (venular diameter = 42+/-4 microm, red-cell velocity = 0.55+/-0.5 mm/sec). All dogs showed significant (P < 0.05) post-hemorrhagic microvascular changes: approximately 20% decrease in venular diameter and approximately 30% increase in red-cell velocity, indicative of sympathetic effects arising from substantial blood loss. Microvascular changes correlated with post-hemorrhagic systemic function and oxygenation changes. All resuscitation modalities except vasopressin restored microvascular and systemic function changes close to pre-hemorrhagic values. However, only autologous blood restored oxygenation changes to pre-hemorrhagic levels. Vasopressin treatment resulted in further decreases in venular diameter (approximately 50%) as well as red-cell velocity (approximately 70%) without improving cardiac output. Our results suggested that volume replenishment - not oxygen-carrying capability - played an important role in pre-hospital/en route treatment for hemorrhagic shock. Vasopressin treatment resulted in inadvertent detrimental outcome without the intended benefit.

Vasopressin in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit: Myth or reality

Pediatric cardiac surgery is undergoing a metamorphosis, with more and more critical patients being operated in our country today. Although the principles of physiology have not changed, it is imperative that care providers continue to stay abreast with developments and newer drugs that may help modify the outcome. The team dynamics have also become more complex, which necessitates the need for all care providers (surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, and intensivists) to better understand the interactions and benefits of newer drugs. Vasopressin has been used in our adult patients for more than a decade and recently has found its rightful place in the pediatric armoury. The objective of this article is to review the physiology of vasopressin and the rationale of its use in critically ill children with shock, in context of the available published data.

Physiology and pathophysiology of the vasopressinergic system

Arginine vasopressin, a hypothalamic peptide hormone, has multiple physiological functions, including body water regulation, control of blood pressure and effects on body temperature, insulin release, corticotropin release, memory and social behaviour. These functions are achieved via at least three specific G-protein-coupled vasopressin receptors. Development of specific vasopressin receptor antagonists in recent years is helping to elucidate the precise actions of vasopressin at each of these receptor types. The complex signalling and messenger processes which take place after receptor stimulation are now more clearly understood. Vasopressin dysregulation can occur in various disease processes, and a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying physiological synthesis, release and regulation of vasopressin will help in the development of therapies to treat these conditions.

Vasopressin in pediatric shock and cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

To review the physiology and the published literature on the role of vasopressin in shock in children.

DATA SOURCE

We searched MEDLINE (1966-2007), EMBASE (1980-2007), and the Cochrane Library, using the terms vasopressin, terlipressin, and shock and synonyms or related terms for relevant studies in pediatrics. We searched the online ISRCTN-Current Controlled Trials registry for ongoing trials. We reviewed the reference lists of all identified studies and reviews as well as personal files to identify other published studies.

RESULTS

Beneficial effects have been reported in vasodilatory shock and asystolic cardiac arrest in adults. Solid evidence for vasopressin use in children is scant. Observational studies have reported an improvement in blood pressure and rapid weaning off catecholamines during administration of low-dose vasopressin. Dosing in children is extrapolated from adult studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasopressin offers promise in shock and cardiac arrest in children. However, in view of the limited experience with vasopressin, it should be used with caution. Results of a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in children with vasodilatory shock will be available soon.

Vasopressin in shock states

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is growing evidence that in end-stage shock or during cardiac arrest, inappropriately low endogenous vasopressin plasma levels may be responsible for pathologic vasodilatation, inadequate organ perfusion, and poor outcome. The purpose of this article is to review recent publications featuring arginine vasopressin as a potent vasoconstrictor in various shock states such as systemic vasodilatation, severe hypovolemia, or cardiac arrest.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several retrospective investigations give evidence that vasopressin at a dosage of 2-6 U/h is effective in reversing catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock due to sepsis or after cardiopulmonary bypass, but prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted. In experimental hypovolemic cardiac arrest or therapy-resistant (irreversible) hypovolemic shock, vasopressin may be an intriguing therapy, although human evidence is not available. Animal data gives strong evidence that vasopressin given during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves both return of spontaneous circulation and neurological outcome. Clinical experience on the use of vasopressin for in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with short response time showed equipotency with epinephrine; in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation, vasopressin showed improved 24 h survival in comparison with epinephrine. After the large European multicenter study completed in summer 2002, we will hopefully be able to better determine the role of vasopressin versus epinephrine in the management of adult cardiac arrest.

SUMMARY

Vasopressin administration is emerging as a rational and promising therapy in the management of various shock states and cardiac arrest.

Vasopressin for the septic burn patient

BACKGROUND

Exogenous arginine vasopressin (VP) has been increasingly used in the hemodynamic management of critically ill patients with septic shock, but its use in septic burn patients has not been systematically examined.

PURPOSE

To review our experience with the use of VP in septic burn patients.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients who received VP at a tertiary care adult regional burn centre. Only patients who strictly met the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Criteria for sepsis at the time of VP initiation were analysed.

RESULTS

There were 30 septic burn patients treated on 43 distinct occasions with VP. This group had a mean (+/-S.D.) age of 49+/-19 years, a mean % TBSA burn of 41+/-15% and a 37% incidence of inhalation injury. A significant increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP), a significant decrease in heart rate (HR), and a trend towards increased urine output (UO) occurred following initiation of VP. When VP was added to an existing infusion of norepinephrine (NE), there was a significant NE sparing effect. VP was implicated in the death of one patient who developed diffuse upper gastrointestinal necrosis while on VP. Other complications in patients treated with VP included peripheral ischemia (2), skin graft failure (1) and donor site conversion (1). In all complications, VP had been administered in combination with prolonged NE infusions (mean of 10 microg/min over a mean of 177 h).

CONCLUSION

VP is a useful adjunctive pressor that spares NE requirements in septic burn patients, but its use is not without risks, particularly when VP is combined with sustained moderate to high infusions of NE.

Vasopressin in Hypotensive and Shock States

Clinical reports and experimental studies support the beneficial effects of low-dose vasopressin infusions in vasodilatory shock. Before we can recommend vasopressin for routine clinical use in vasodilatory shock, and particularly septic shock, we must await the results of currently ongoing and recently completed randomized clinical trials to ensure that vasopressin does indeed have beneficial effects on organ function and outcome.

Vasopressin improves outcome in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation of ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia: a observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

An increasing body of evidence from laboratory and clinical studies suggests that vasopressin may represent a promising alternative vasopressor for use during cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Current guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommend the use of adrenaline (epinephrine), with vasopressin considered only as a secondary option because of limited clinical data.

METHOD

The present study was conducted in a prehospital setting and included patients with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia undergoing one of three treatments: group I patients received only adrenaline 1 mg every 3 minutes; group II patients received one intravenous dose of arginine vasopressin (40 IU) after three doses of 1 mg epinephrine; and patients in group III received vasopressin 40 IU as first-line therapy. The cause of cardiac arrest (myocardial infarction or other cause) was established for each patient in hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients who suffered nontraumatic cardiac arrest were included in the study. The rates of restoration of spontaneous circulation and subsequent hospital admission were higher in vasopressin-treated groups (23/53 [45%] in group I, 19/31 [61%] in group II and 17/27 [63%] in group III). There were also higher 24-hour survival rates among vasopressin-treated patients (P < 0.05), and more vasopressin-treated patients were discharged from hospital (10/51 [20%] in group I, 8/31 [26%] in group II and 7/27 [26%] group III; P = 0.21). Especially in the subgroup of patients with myocardial infarction as the underlying cause of cardiac arrest, the hospital discharge rate was significantly higher in vasopressin-treated patients (P < 0.05). Among patients who were discharged from hospital, we found no significant differences in neurological status between groups.

CONCLUSION

The greater 24-hour survival rate in vasopressin-treated patients suggests that consideration of combined vasopressin and adrenaline is warranted for the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. This is especially the case for those patients with myocardial infarction, for whom vasopressin treatment is also associated with a higher hospital discharge rate.

VASOPRESSIN MAY BE USEFUL IN THE TREATMENT OF SYSTEMIC ANAPHYLAXIS IN RABBITS

Recent studies demonstrate that vasopressin is useful when treating hemorrhagic and septic shock. The effect of vasopressin on systemic anaphylaxis has not been investigated except in clinical case reports. Vasopressin increases blood pressure because of vasoconstriction through the V1 receptor. Thus, we evaluated the effect of vasopressin on circulatory depression and bronchoconstriction provoked by systemic anaphylaxis and survival rates in rabbits. In the first set of experiments, 15 nonsensitized rabbits received normal saline (control) and vasopressin at 0.8 or 0.08 U/kg. In the second set, 40 sensitized rabbits received horse serum to induce anaphylaxis, and then received the same drugs as in the first set. In the first set, mean arterial pressure (MAP) in vasopressin groups increased by 18% to 24% compared with the control. Vasopressin at 0.8 U/kg decreased MAP insignificantly before the increases of MAP occurred. In the second set, vasopressin at 0.08 U/kg improved the survival rate. At 45 min after antigen challenge, 69% of the rabbits that received vasopressin at 0.08 U/kg were alive, whereas 29% of the control rabbits and 23% of the rabbits that received vasopressin at 0.8 U/kg were alive. Vasopressin increased MAP by 36% to 109% compared with the control within 5 min, however, at 2 min, vasopressin at 0.8 U/kg had no effect on MAP. Pulmonary dynamics were similar. In conclusion, vasopressin at 0.08 U/kg improved survival rates and severe hypotension provoked by systemic anaphylaxis, suggesting that this agent may be useful in the treatment of systemic anaphylaxis.

Vasopressin and terlipressin: pharmacology and its clinical relevance

Vasopressin and its analogue, terlipressin, are potent vasopressors that may be useful therapeutic agents in the treatment of cardiac arrest, septic and catecholamine-resistant shock and oesophageal variceal haemorrhage. The aim of this article is to review the physiology and pharmacology of vasopressin and summarise its efficacy and safety in clinical trials and its subsequent therapeutic use. Recent studies indicate that the use of vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may improve the survival of patients with asystolic cardiac arrest. Vasopressin deficiency can contribute to refractory shock states associated with sepsis, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. Low doses of vasopressin and terlipressin can restore vasomotor tone in conditions that are resistant to catecholamines, with preservation of renal blood flow and urine output. They are also useful in reducing bleeding and mortality associated with oesophageal variceal haemorrhage. The long-term outcome of the use of these drugs is not known.

Die Behandlung des hämorrhagischen Schocks

The future of shock treatment depends on the importance of scientific results, and the willingness of physicians to optimize, and to reconsider established treatment protocols. There are four major potentially promising approaches to advanced trauma life support. First, control of hemorrhage by administration of local hemostatic agents, and a better, target-controlled management of the coagulation system. Second, improving intravascular volume by recruiting blood from the venous vasculature by preventing mistakes during mechanical ventilation, and by employing alternative spontaneous (i.e. use of the inspiratory threshold valve) or artificial ventilation strategies. In addition, artificial oxygen carriers may improve intravascular volume and oxygen delivery. Third, pharmacologic support of physiologic, endogenous mechanisms involved in the compensation phase of shock, and blockade of pathomechanisms that are known to cause irreversible vasoplegia (arginine vasopressin and K(ATP) channel blockers for hemodynamic stabilization). Fourth, employing potentially protective strategies such as mild or moderate hypothermia. Finally, the ultimate vision of trauma resuscitation is the concept of "suspended animation" as a form of delayed resuscitation after protection of vital organ systems.

Clinical review: Vasopressin and terlipressin in septic shock patients

Vasopressin (antidiuretic hormone) is emerging as a potentially major advance in the treatment of septic shock. Terlipressin (tricyl-lysine-vasopressin) is the synthetic, long-acting analogue of vasopressin, and has comparable pharmacodynamic but different pharmacokinetic properties. Vasopressin mediates vasoconstriction via V₁ receptor activation on vascular smooth muscle. Septic shock first causes a transient early increase in blood vasopressin concentrations; these concentrations subsequently decrease to very low levels as compared with those observed with other causes of hypotension. Infusions of 0.01–0.04 U/min vasopressin in septic shock patients increase plasma vasopressin concentrations. This increase is associated with reduced need for other vasopressors. Vasopressin has been shown to result in greater blood flow diversion from nonvital to vital organ beds compared with adrenaline (epinephrine). Of concern is a constant decrease in cardiac output and oxygen delivery, the consequences of which in terms of development of multiple organ failure are not yet known. Terlipressin (one or two boluses of 1 mg) has similar effects, but this drug has been used in far fewer patients. Large randomized clinical trials should be conducted to establish the utility of these drugs as therapeutic agents in patients with septic shock.

The Role of Vasopressin in Vasodilatory Septic Shock

Septic shock that requires therapy with adrenergic agents is associated with high rates of mortality. Inappropriately normal or low serum concentrations of vasopressin contribute to the development of hypotension during sepsis. We critically evaluated the role of administering exogenous vasopressin to patients with septic shock. A computerized search of MEDLINE from January 1966--December 2003 and a manual search of relevant journals for abstracts were conducted. Eleven retrospective, six prospective cohort, and four prospective randomized studies were identified. Most studies evaluated short-term infusions of vasopressin at 0.08 U/minute or less as add-on therapy in patients requiring adrenergic agents. The results show that starting vasopressin in patients with septic shock increases systemic vascular resistance and arterial blood pressure, thus reducing the dosage requirements of adrenergic agents. These effects are rapid and sustained. Substantial enhancement of urine production, likely due to increased glomerular filtration rate, was shown in several studies. A few studies demonstrated clinically significant reduced cardiac output or cardiac index after vasopressin was begun, necessitating cautious use in patients with cardiac dysfunction. Vasopressin was associated with ischemia of the mesenteric mucosa, skin, and myocardium; elevated hepatic transaminase and bilirubin concentrations; hyponatremia; and thrombocytopenia. Limiting the dosage to 0.03 U/minut or less may minimize the development of these adverse effects. Vasopressin 0.03 U/minute or less should be considered if response to one or two adrenergic agents is inadequate or as a method to reduce the dosage of adrenergic agents. At present, vasopressin therapy should not be started as first-line therapy. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimum dosage, duration, and place in therapy of vasopressin relative to adrenergic agents. A multicenter, comparative study of vasopressin 0.03 U/minute as add-on therapy is under way and should provide mortality data.

[Pre-clinical management of shock patients]

The preclinical diagnosis of shock is still based on the patient's history, the physical examination, the injury pattern and a few hemodynamic parameters available in the emergency set-up. The clinical picture is characterised by hypotension and tachycardia, tachypnoe and dyspnoea as well as cerebral impairment. Results from recent clinical trials indicate, that a adapted and specific therapeutic approach for the various shock forms is necessary. In case of traumatic hypovolemic-hemorrhagic shock it is of particular relevance if penetrating trauma and/or uncontrolled bleeding exists. Under these conditions an immediate definite surgical treatment is required ("scoop and run") and a moderate hypotension should be tolerated. ("treat and run"). Fluid substitution and therapy with catecholamines should be used conservatively. In all other forms of shock the treatment approach can and should be more aggressive in order to improve microvascular perfusion as early as possible. Besides adequate fluid resuscitation in a combination of crystalloid and colloid solutions catecholamines and-under specific circumstances-also vasopressin should be used. Of utmost importance in the pre-clinical management of patients in shock is the optimal selection of the centre that the patient is referred to in order to establish the fastest and best possible definite treatment for the patient.

Comparative effects of vasopressin, norepinephrine, and L-canavanine, a selective inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase, in endotoxic shock

Norepinephrine (NE), a standard of care, AVP, an alternative candidate, and L-canavanine (LC), a selective inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase, were compared for efficacy and innocuousness on global and regional hemodynamics, plasmatic and tissue lactate-to-pyruvate ratio (L/P), tissue high-energy phosphates, renal function, and tissue capillary permeability in a rat model of endotoxic normokinetic shock. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased ( approximately 35%) but aortic blood flow increased during endotoxin infusion (P < 0.05 vs. control). Additionally, there was a decrease in mesenteric (MBF) and renal (RBF) blood flows along with regional-to-systemic ratio (P < 0.05 vs. control). All tested drugs restored MAP to basal levels but slightly decreased abdominal aortic flow; however, RBF and MBF remained unchanged. Endotoxin significantly decreased diuresis and inulin clearance ( approximately 3- to 4-fold), whereas AVP or LC attenuated this drop (P < 0.05 vs. control). In contrast, NE did not improve endotoxin-induced renal dysfunction. Endotoxin induced gut and lung hyperpermeability (P < 0.05 vs. control). Endotoxin-induced gut hyperpermeability was inhibited by AVP, LC, and NE. Endotoxin-induced lung hyperpermeability was further worsened by NE ( approximately 2-fold increase) but not AVP infusion (P < 0.05 vs. endotoxin). LC significantly improved endotoxin-induced pulmonary hyperpermeability. Endotoxin increased renal lactate and decreased renal ATP. NE did not change renal lactate or renal ATP. AVP and LC decreased renal lactate and normalized renal ATP. Finally, endotoxin was associated with increased lactate levels and L/P ( approximately 2- and 1.5-fold increases vs. control, respectively), whereas AVP and LC, but not NE, normalized both parameters after endotoxin challenge. These results suggest that, in a short-term endotoxic shock model, AVP improves systemic hemodynamics without side effects and has particular beneficial effects on renal function.

Arginine vasopressin compromises gut mucosal microcirculation in septic rats

OBJECTIVE

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is increasingly used in the therapy of septic patients with hypotension. However, its effects on the microvascular networks have not been studied in detail. This study was designed to determine the effects of AVP infusion on the villus microcirculation of the septic rat ileum.

DESIGN

Prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-blinded trial.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Fifteen male Sprague-Dawley rats.

INTERVENTIONS

Twenty-four hours after cecal ligation and perforation to create sepsis (M1), rats (n = 8) received a continuous AVP infusion to increase mean arterial pressure by 20 mm Hg (M2) and 40 mm Hg (M3) from M1. In the control group (n = 7), an equivalent volume of normal saline was infused.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Videomicroscopy was performed on 6-10 villi of ileum mucosa at M1 and was repeated at M2 and M3. Blood was drawn to determine plasma levels of AVP and interleukin-6. At M1, both study groups were hypotensive compared with preseptic data (mean arterial pressure, -25%). The increase in mean arterial pressure was linked to supraphysiologic AVP plasma levels and was accompanied by a decrease in mean mucosal blood flow by 76% at M2 and 81% at M3 (p <.001 vs. control). Red blood cell velocity fell by 45% and 47%, respectively (p <.05 vs. control). Whereas periods of arrested villus blood flow increased from 8.1 +/- 2.6 secs/min to 43.8 +/- 5.2 and 47 +/- 6.2 secs/min at M2 and M3 (p <.001), the diameter of terminal arterioles remained unchanged. In addition, AVP infusion further augmented the sepsis-associated increase in interleukin-6 levels (AVP, 905 +/- 160 vs. control, 638 +/- 55 pg/mL; p =.022).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence for severe abnormalities in gut mucosal blood flow after AVP infusion in septic rats, accompanied by an augmented inflammatory response to the septic injury. The effects of AVP on microvascular blood flow in this model may be related to AVP activities on larger arterioles (>40 microm), a concomitant reduction in cardiac output, or even both.

Perioperative Pharmacotherapy in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Heart failure remains the leading cause of death in Western countries, affecting 4.9 million individuals and causing >300 000 deaths annually in the US alone. The disease is highly prevalent in the elderly population and often follows a course of progressive disability and deterioration. An estimated 15 000 patients with end-stage heart failure could benefit from heart transplant each year. Yet, as a result of a significant shortage of donor organs, only 2500 hearts are donated annually, and approximately one-third of patients awaiting heart transplant die each year. Mechanical circulatory support, primarily in the form of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), has come to the forefront of treatment for severe congestive heart failure by providing a feasible alternative to patients who might otherwise die awaiting heart transplant. The arrival of LVADs has resulted in a dramatic shift in the management of heart failure, one that will undoubtedly affect and include a vast proportion of elderly patients. While LVADs represent a surgical approach to a disease that has traditionally been managed medically, the pharmacological application throughout the perioperative period remains of critical importance. Five primary classes of drugs bear specific application to the LVAD population: (i) drugs that provide haemodynamic support; (ii) antimicrobials; (iii) anticoagulants and antiplatelets; (iv) agents that promote myocardial recovery; and (v) miscellaneous other medications. Drugs that provide haemodynamic support are subdivided into inotropes, vasopressors and pulmonary vasodilators. Some combination of these medications is usually administered within the perioperative period in order to maintain stable patient haemodynamics and assure proper LVAD function. Antimicrobials are of paramount importance in the pre-, intra- and postoperative periods to minimise the risk of infection, an unfortunately common complication of LVAD therapy that can have potentially morbid consequences. Anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications are necessary for certain types of LVADs and serve to curb the incidence of device thrombus formation and associated embolic phenomena. Pharmacotherapeutic agents that facilitate myocardial recovery are being investigated as adjuncts to LVAD support so that bridge to recovery can become a realistic outcome for a growing number of LVAD patients. The miscellaneous class of medications used with LVADs includes those that minimise the risk of bleeding in select patients and those that enhance proper vitamin and nutrient status in the postoperative period, the attainment of which may serve vital to a successful recovery.

The Effect of Vasopressin on Gastric Perfusion in Catecholamine-Dependent Patients in Septic Shock

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of continuous infusion of vasopressin on the splanchnic circulation in patients with severe septic shock.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

ICU in a teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Eleven consecutive patients with documented septic shock who remained hypotensive despite norepinephrine infusion at a rate > or =0.2 microg/kg/min.

INTERVENTIONS

Insertion of a gastric tonometry catheter, and continuous infusion of vasopressin 0.04 U/min during 4 h.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Difference between gastric and arterial CO(2) partial pressure (P[g-a]CO(2) gap), mean arterial pressure, and cardiac index were recorded at baseline and after 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 120 min, and 240 min.

RESULTS

The median P(g-a)CO(2) gap increased from 5 mm Hg at baseline to 19 mm Hg after 4 h (p = 0.022). Mean arterial pressure increased from 61 +/- 13 mm Hg at baseline to 68 +/- 9 mm Hg after 4 h (p = 0.055). No significant changes in cardiac index were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

In norepinephrine-dependent patients in septic shock, continuous infusion of low-dose vasopressin results in a significant increase of the P(g-a)CO(2) gap compatible with GI hypoperfusion.

Early use of small-dose vasopressin for unstable hemodynamics in an acute brain injury patient refractory to catecholamine treatment: a case report

IMPLICATIONS

Small-dose IV vasopressin infusion may be beneficial in acute brain injury patients with unstable hemodynamics who are refractory to fluid resuscitation and catecholamine vasopressors.

[Indications of vasopressin in the management of septic shock]

OBJECTIVE

Vasopressin (antidiuretic hormone) is emerging as a potentially major advancement in the treatment of septic shock. Vasopressin is both a vasopressor and an antidiuretic hormone. It also has haemostatic, gastrointestinal, and thermoregulatory effects. This article reviews the physiology of vasopressin and all the relevant clinical literature on its use in the treatment of septic shock.

DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION

Extraction from Pubmed database of French and English articles on the physiology and clinical use of vasopressin. The following key words were selected: vasodilatory shock, vasopressin, septic shock, catecholamines, norepinephrine, renal function, diuresis, mesenteric haemodynamic. The collected articles were reviewed and selected according to their quality and originality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Vasopressin mediates vasoconstriction via V1-receptor activation on vascular smooth muscle. Septic shock causes first a transient early increase in blood vasopressin concentrations that decreases later to very low concentrations compared to other causes of hypotension. Vasopressin infusion of 0.01-0.04 U min(-1) in septic shock patients increases plasma vasopressin concentrations. This increase is associated with a lesser need for other vasopressors. Vasopressin has been shown to produce greater blood flow diversion from non-vital to vital organ beds than does adrenaline. A large randomized clinical trial should be performed to assess its place as a therapeutic agent of septic shock patient.

Effects of titrated arginine vasopressin on hemodynamic variables and oxygen transport in healthy and endotoxemic sheep

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of titrated arginine vasopressin (AVP) alone or in combination with norepinephrine (NE) on hemodynamics and oxygen transport in healthy and endotoxemic sheep.

DESIGN

Prospective controlled trial.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Six adult ewes.

INTERVENTIONS

Healthy sheep received AVP as a titrated infusion, initiated with 0.6 units/hr and increased by 0.6 units/hr every 15 mins, either until mean arterial pressure was increased by 20 mm Hg vs. baseline or a maximum of 3.6 units/hr was administered. After 90 mins, AVP infusion was continued with the investigated dosage, and NE (0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was also infused for 90 mins. After a 24-hr period of recovery, endotoxemia was induced and maintained (Salmonella typhosa endotoxin, 10 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1)) in the same sheep for the next 19 hrs. After 16 hrs of endotoxemia, AVP and NE were administered as described previously.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Hemodynamics were obtained at baseline, every 15 mins during the titration period, and 60 and 90 mins after additional NE infusion. Variables of oxygen transport were calculated before and after the titration period. In healthy and endotoxemic sheep, AVP reduced heart rate and cardiac index (p <.001) and compromised oxygen delivery (p <.001) and oxygen consumption (healthy sheep, p =.003; endotoxemic sheep, p <.001). Vasopressin infusion did not alter mean pulmonary arterial pressure but increased pulmonary vascular resistance index in both groups (p <.001). Additional infusion of NE further augmented mean arterial pressure and increased cardiac index during endotoxemia (p <.001). This was accompanied by an increase in oxygen delivery and consumption (p <.05 each).

CONCLUSIONS

During ovine endotoxemia, AVP decreased cardiac index, compromised oxygen delivery, and increased pulmonary vascular resistance index. These side effects may limit its use as a sole vasopressor during sepsis. Potentially, a simultaneous infusion of AVP and NE could represent a useful therapeutic option.

Vasopressin for Vasodilatory Shock

This feature examines the impact of pharmacologic interventions on the treatment of the critically ill patient–an area of health care that has become increasingly complex. It will review recent advances (including evolving and controversial data) in drug therapy for adult ICU patients and assess these new modalities in terms of clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. Direct questions or comments to Gil Fraser, PharmD, at fraseg@mmc.org .

Shy-Drager syndrome and severe unexplained intraoperative hypotension responsive to vasopressin

IMPLICATIONS

We describe the first case of Shy-Drager syndrome diagnosed on the basis of intraoperative hemodynamic changes. The initial hypertension in the supine position followed by severe hypotension after hydralazine administration, ultimately responsive to vasopressin, led to a diagnosis of Shy-Drager syndrome. We suggest that vasopressin may be the drug of choice in patients with Shy-Drager syndrome with refractory hypotension.

Advanced life support drugs: do they really work?

Basic life support and rapid defibrillation for ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia are the only two interventions that have been shown unequivocally to improve survival after cardiac arrest. Several drugs are advocated to treat cardiac arrest, but despite very encouraging animal data, no drug has been reliably proven to increase survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest. This review focuses on recent experimental and clinical data concerning the use of vasopressin, amiodarone, magnesium, and fibrinolytics during advanced life support (ALS). Animal data indicate that, in comparison with epinephrine (adrenaline), vasopressin produces better vital organ blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). These apparent advantages have yet to be converted into improved survival in large-scale trials of cardiac arrest in humans. Data from two prospective, randomized trials suggest that amiodarone may improve short-term survival after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. On the basis of anecdotal data, magnesium is recommended therapy for torsades de pointes and for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation associated with hypomagnesemia. In the past, CPR has been a contraindication to giving fibrinolytics, but several studies have demonstrated the relative safety of fibrinolysis during and after CPR. Fibrinolytics are likely to be beneficial when cardiac arrest is associated with plaque rupture and fresh coronary thrombus or massive pulmonary embolism. Fibrinolysis may also improve cerebral microcirculatory perfusion once a spontaneous circulation has been restored. A planned, prospective, randomized trial may help to define the role of fibrinolysis during out-of-hospital CPR.