1
|
Khodavirdi AC, Multani JK, Oh SS, Vuvu F, Bensink ME, Stockl KM, Hawkins K, Chiang CC, Green AL, Tepper SJ. Treatment patterns of patients with migraine eligible for anti-CGRP pathway monoclonal antibodies. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1433423. [PMID: 39165264 PMCID: PMC11333223 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1433423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder, with a wide range of symptoms and disease burden, underscoring the heterogeneity of patients' disease characteristics and treatment needs. To characterize the profile of migraine patients in the US who may be eligible for preventive treatment with an anti-CGRP pathway mAb and to better understand treatment patterns and real-world use of acute and preventive medications for migraine, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients. Methods These patients were identified as having migraine using diagnosis codes or migraine-specific medication use (first = index) in the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database. Patients were required to have ≥ 12 months of continuous enrollment in medical and pharmacy benefits prior to index (baseline) and after index (follow-up). Patients were stratified into chronic migraine (CM) and non-chronic migraine (non-CM) by diagnosis codes. Based on acute migraine-specific medication dispensing data in the follow-up period, non-CM patients were divided into 3 cohorts: highest, middle, and lowest tertile of total units of dispensed acute migraine-specific medication (gepants, ditans, ergot derivatives, and triptans). Migraine medication use was captured in the baseline and follow-up periods. Results A total of 22,584 CM and 216,807 non-CM patients (72,269 patients in each tertile) were identified and included in the study. Over the follow-up, CM patients had a mean of 70 units of acute migraine-specific medications dispensed, while the highest, middle, and lowest tertile of non-CM patients had a mean of 92, 29, and 10 units, respectively. Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway mAbs were dispensed for 28.9% of CM patients, and for 6.9%, 4.1%, and 2.9% of non-CM patients in the highest, middle, and lowest tertiles, respectively. Conclusion A lower proportion of non-CM patients had use of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway mAbs compared to CM patients, confirming the unmet need with appropriate preventive medication. There appears to be a persistent gap in management of patients without a diagnosis of CM who are dispensed high quantities of acute migraine-specific medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sam S. Oh
- Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
| | - Fiston Vuvu
- Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Stewart J. Tepper
- The New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oh SY, Kang JJ, Park HK, Cho SJ, Hong Y, Kang MK, Moon HS, Lee MJ, Song TJ, Suh YJ, Chu MK. Three-month treatment outcome of medication-overuse headache according to classes of overused medications, use of acute medications, and preventive treatments. Sci Rep 2024; 14:16013. [PMID: 38992145 PMCID: PMC11239667 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66906-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a chronic headache disorder that results from excessive use of acutely symptomatic headache medications, leading to more frequent and severe headaches. This study aims to assess the 3-month treatment outcomes in MOH patients, focusing on the types and usage of overused medications, as well as preventive treatments. This prospective cross-sectional study analyzed the treatment outcomes of 309 MOH patients from April 2020 to March 2022. Patients were advised to discontinue overused medications immediately and offered preventive treatments based on clinical judgment. Data on headache characteristics, medication use, and impact on daily life were collected at baseline and 3 months. Results showed overall significant improvements in headache-related variables in patients completing the 3-month treatment follow-up. The median number of headache days per month decreased from 15 days at baseline to 8 days after 3 months (p < 0.001). Patients who overused multiple drug classes demonstrated increased disability levels (mean Headache Impact Test-6 score: 62 at baseline vs. 56 at 3 months, p < 0.01). Those who continued overusing medications reported more days of severe headache (mean 18 days at baseline vs. 14 days at 3 months, p < 0.05) and greater impact (mean Migraine Disability Assessment score: 35 at baseline vs. 28 after 3 months, p < 0.05) compared to the baseline. Differences in headache outcomes were evident across different preventive treatment groups, with generalized estimating equation analyses highlighting significant associations between clinical characteristics, overused medication classes, and preventive treatments. Most MOH clinical features significantly improved after 3 months of treatment. However, notable interactions were observed with certain clinical presentations, suggesting possible influences of overused medication classes, usage patterns, and preventive treatment types on MOH treatment outcomes. This study underscores the importance of individualized treatment strategies and the potential benefits of discontinuing overused medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun-Young Oh
- Department of Neurology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital & School of Medicine, Jeonju, South Korea
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea
| | - Jin-Ju Kang
- Department of Neurology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital & School of Medicine, Jeonju, South Korea
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea
| | - Hong-Kyun Park
- Department of Neurology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Soo-Jin Cho
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, South Korea
| | - Yooha Hong
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, South Korea
| | - Mi-Kyoung Kang
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, South Korea
| | - Heui-Soo Moon
- Department of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tae-Jin Song
- Department of Neurology, Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young Ju Suh
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Korea
| | - Min Kyung Chu
- Department of Neurology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Naegel S. [Medication overuse headache]. FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE-PSYCHIATRIE 2024; 92:298-303. [PMID: 39025057 DOI: 10.1055/a-2332-5973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a globally prevalent and debilitating condition that results from excessive use of acute therapies and can significantly affect quality of life, despite the fact that simple information about the causes and consequences of the condition can help prevent or stop MOH. In recent years, many new insights have been gained into headaches caused by medication overuse. In addition, the diagnostic criteria and guideline recommendations have changed considerably. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the clinic, definition/classification, epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, controversies, prevention, and treatment of MOH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Naegel
- Neurologie, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus Rüttenscheid, Essen, Germany
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Obermann M, Katsarava Z. Headache Attributed to a Substance or Its Withdrawal. Neurol Clin 2024; 42:497-506. [PMID: 38575262 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2023.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Identification of substances that may cause or trigger headache is important to start effective treatment early to prevent unnecessary suffering, deterioration in quality of life, and the development of chronic pain. Treatment in case of medication overuse and other chronic headache should be decisive and effective. Drug withdrawal and introduction of effective prophylactic medication for the underlying headache disorder should be the primary treatment strategy. Typical headache-inducing substances are nitric oxide, phosphodiesterase, cocaine, alcohol, histamine, carbon oxide, and calcitonin gene-related peptide. The withdrawal of caffeine, estrogen, and opioids is most often associated with the development of headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Obermann
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Weser-Egge, Brenkhaeuser Str. 71, Hoexter 37671, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany.
| | - Zaza Katsarava
- Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45147, Germany; Evangelical Hospital Unna, Holbeinstr. 10, Unna 59423, Germany; EVEX Medical Corporation, 3 Vekua Street, Tiblisi, Republic of Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rizzoli P. Medication-Overuse Headache. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2024; 30:379-390. [PMID: 38568489 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Medication-overuse headache (MOH) has been described for almost 100 years and is characterized as a daily or near-daily headache that usually presents in patients with preexisting primary headache disorders who are overusing one or more acute or symptomatic headache medications. This article reviews the diagnosis and management of patients with MOH. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS The International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria for MOH have changed over time. The worldwide prevalence appears to be between 1% and 2%. Together, headache disorders, including MOH, are currently ranked as the second leading cause of years lived with disability in the Global Burden of Disease world health survey. Significant neurophysiologic changes are seen in the brains of patients with MOH, including functional alterations in central pain processing and modulating systems and central sensitization. Research supports updates to the principles of management, including weaning off the overused medication, preventive therapy, biobehavioral therapy, and patient education. ESSENTIAL POINTS MOH is a fairly common and treatable secondary headache disorder that produces significant disability and a substantial reduction in quality of life. The costs related to lost income and disability are substantial. MOH is intimately related to chronic migraine, which continues to be underrecognized and undertreated. Treatment focuses on both the institution of effective preventive migraine therapy and the reduction or removal of the overused medications. Educational efforts directed toward both providers and patients have been shown to be effective in reducing the effect of MOH.
Collapse
|
6
|
Takizawa T, Kitano T, Iijima M, Togo K, Yonemoto N. Treatment patterns and characteristics of patients with migraine: results from a retrospective database study in Japan. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:19. [PMID: 38331739 PMCID: PMC10854051 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01722-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical characteristics and treatment practice of patients with migraine in Japan in real-world setting have not been fully investigated. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using claims database to understand the clinical practice of migraine in recent years and to characterize patients potentially not managed well by current treatment options. METHODS Our study used data from the large claims database maintained by JMDC Inc. Patients with diagnosis of headache or migraine between January 1, 2018, and July 31, 2022, were defined as the headache cohort, and those with migraine diagnosis and prescription of migraine treatments among the headache cohort were included in the migraine cohort. In the headache cohort, characteristics of medical facilities and status of imaging tests to distinguish secondary headache were examined. Treatment patterns and characteristics of patients potentially not managed well by acute/preventive treatment were described in migraine cohort. RESULTS In the headache cohort, 989,514 patients were included with 57.0% females and mean age of 40.3 years; 77.0% patients visited clinics (with ≤ 19 bed capacities) for their primary diagnosis, and 30.3% patients underwent imaging tests (computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging). In the migraine cohort, 165,339 patients were included with 65.0% females and mean age of 38.8 years. In the migraine cohort, 95.6% received acute treatment while 20.8% received preventive treatment. Acetaminophen/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were most common (54.8%) as the initial prescription for migraine treatment followed by triptan (51.4%). First treatment prescription included preventive treatment in 15.6%, while the proportion increased to 82.2% in the fourth treatment prescription. Among patients with more than 12 months of follow-up, 3.7% had prescription patterns suggestive of risk of medication-overuse headache, and these patients were characterized by a higher percentage of females and a higher prevalence of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that approximately one-fifth of the patients with migraine visiting medical facilities use preventive drugs. The presence of potential patients at risk of medication-overuse headache and the role of clinics in migraine treatment were also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsubasa Takizawa
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kitano
- Health & Venue, Pfizer Japan Inc., Shinjuku Bunka Quint Building, 3-22-7, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Iijima
- Internal Medicine & Hospital Medical Affairs, Pfizer Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kanae Togo
- Health & Venue, Pfizer Japan Inc., Shinjuku Bunka Quint Building, 3-22-7, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| | - Naohiro Yonemoto
- Health & Venue, Pfizer Japan Inc., Shinjuku Bunka Quint Building, 3-22-7, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee MJ, Park HK, Oh SY, Kang JJ, Hong Y, Moon HS, Song TJ, Chu MK, Cho SJ. Effect of prednisolone for the treatment of medication-overuse headache: A 3-month result from a multicenter REgistry for Load and management of mEdicAtion overuSE headache (RELEASE) study. Headache 2024; 64:149-155. [PMID: 38284247 DOI: 10.1111/head.14667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of prednisolone in the treatment of medication-overuse headache (MOH) using data from a multicenter prospective registry (Registry for Load and Management of Medication Overuse Headache [RELEASE]). BACKGROUND The treatment of MOH is challenging, especially when withdrawal headache manifests during the cessation of overused medication. Although systemic corticosteroids have been empirically used to reduce withdrawal headaches, their efficacy on the long-term outcomes of MOH has not been documented. METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of the RELEASE study. The RELEASE is an ongoing multicenter observational cohort study in which patients with MOH have been recruited from seven hospitals in Korea since April 2020. Clinical characteristics, disease profiles, treatments, and outcomes were assessed at baseline and specific time points. We analyzed the effect of prednisolone on MOH reversal at 3 months. RESULTS Among the 309 patients enrolled during the study period, prednisolone was prescribed to 59/309 (19.1%) patients at a dose ranging from 10 to 40 mg/day for 5-14 days; 228/309 patients (73.8%) completed the 3-month follow-up period. The MOH reversal rates at 3 months after baseline were 76% (31/41) in the prednisolone group and 57.8% (108/187) in the non-prednisolone group (p = 0.034). The effect of steroids remained significant (adjusted odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.27-6.1, p = 0.010) after adjusting for the number of monthly headache days at baseline, mode of discontinuation of overused medication, use of early preventive medications, and the number of preventive medications combined. CONCLUSIONS Although our observational study could not draw a definitive conclusion, prednisolone may be effective in the treatment of MOH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong-Kyun Park
- Department of Neurology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Oh
- Department of Neurology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Jin-Ju Kang
- Department of Neurology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Yooha Hong
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Heui-Soo Moon
- Department of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Jin Song
- Department of Neurology, Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Kyung Chu
- Department of Neurology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo-Jin Cho
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cortel-LeBlanc MA, Orr SL, Dunn M, James D, Cortel-LeBlanc A. Managing and Preventing Migraine in the Emergency Department: A Review. Ann Emerg Med 2023; 82:732-751. [PMID: 37436346 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and acute migraine attacks are a common reason for patients to seek care in the emergency department (ED). There have been recent advancements in the care of patients with migraine, specifically emerging evidence for nerve blocks and new pharmacological classes of medications like gepants and ditans. This article serves as a comprehensive review of migraine in the ED, including diagnosis and management of acute complications of migraine (eg, status migrainosus, migrainous infarct, persistent aura without infarction, and aura-triggered seizure) and use of evidence-based migraine-specific treatments in the ED. It highlights the role of migraine preventive medications and provides a framework for emergency physicians to prescribe them to eligible patients. Finally, it evaluates the evidence for nerve blocks in the treatment of migraine and introduces the possible role of gepants and ditans in the care of patients with migraine in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A Cortel-LeBlanc
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Queensway Carleton Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 360 Concussion Care, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Serena L Orr
- Departments of Pediatrics, Community Health Sciences, and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Maeghan Dunn
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Queensway Carleton Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel James
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Achelle Cortel-LeBlanc
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 360 Concussion Care, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Queensway Carleton Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mäki-Marttunen V, Kies DA, Pijpers JA, Louter MA, van der Wee NJ, Rombouts SARB, Nieuwenhuis S, Kruit M, Terwindt GM. Functional connectivity of the visual cortex in chronic migraine before and after medication withdrawal therapy. Neuroimage Clin 2023; 40:103543. [PMID: 37988998 PMCID: PMC10701079 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
Acute withdrawal of headache medication in chronic migraine patients with medication overuse may lead to a dramatic reduction in headache frequency and severity. However, the brain networks underlying chronic migraine and a favorable response to acute withdrawal are still poorly understood. The goal of the present study was to characterize the pattern of intrinsic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) functional connectivity (FC) specific to chronic migraine and to identify changes in FC that characterize subjects with CM reverting to less frequent headaches. Subjects with chronic migraine (N = 99) underwent a resting-state functional MRI scan before and after three months of medication withdrawal therapy. In addition, we included four control groups who were scanned once: healthy participants (N = 27), patients with episodic migraine (N = 25), patients with chronic back pain (N = 22), and patients with clinical depression (N = 17). Using dual regression analysis, we compared whole-brain voxel-level functional connectivity with ten well-known resting-state networks between chronic migraine and control groups, and between responders to treatment (≥50 % reduction in monthly headache days) and non-responders (<50 % reduction), before and after treatment. Subjects with chronic migraine showed differences in FC with a number of RS-networks, most of which involved the visual cortex, compared with healthy controls. A comparison with patients with episodic migraine, chronic pain and depression showed differences in the same direction, suggesting that altered patterns of functional connectivity in chronic migraine patients could to some extent be explained by shared symptomatology with other pain, depression, or migraine conditions. A comparison between responders and non-responders indicated that effective withdrawal reduced FC with the visual cortex for responders. Interestingly, responders already differed in functional connectivity of the visual cortex at baseline compared with non-responders. Altogether, we show that chronic migraine and successful medication withdrawal therapy are linked to changes in the functional connectivity of the visual cortex. These neuroimaging findings provide new insights into the pathways underlying migraine chronification and its reversibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Mäki-Marttunen
- Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Kies
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Judith A Pijpers
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark A Louter
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nic J van der Wee
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Serge A R B Rombouts
- Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sander Nieuwenhuis
- Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Kruit
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martelletti P, Leonardi M, Ashina M, Burstein R, Cho SJ, Charway-Felli A, Dodick DW, Gil-Gouveia R, Grazzi L, Lampl C, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Minen MT, Mitsikostas DD, Olesen J, Owolabi MO, Reuter U, Ruiz de la Torre E, Sacco S, Schwedt TJ, Serafini G, Surya N, Tassorelli C, Wang SJ, Wang Y, Wijeratne T, Raggi A. Rethinking headache as a global public health case model for reaching the SDG 3 HEALTH by 2030. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:140. [PMID: 37884869 PMCID: PMC10604921 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01666-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development sets out, through 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a path for the prosperity of people and the planet. SDG 3 in particular aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages and includes several targets to enhance health. This review presents a "headache-tailored" perspective on how to achieve SDG 3 by focusing on six specific actions: targeting chronic headaches; reducing the overuse of acute pain-relieving medications; promoting the education of healthcare professionals; granting access to medication in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); implementing training and educational opportunities for healthcare professionals in low and middle income countries; building a global alliance against headache disorders. Addressing the burden of headache disorders directly impacts on populations' health, as well as on the possibility to improve the productivity of people aged below 50, women in particular. Our analysis pointed out several elements, and included: moving forward from frequency-based parameters to define headache severity; recognizing and managing comorbid diseases and risk factors; implementing a disease management multi-modal management model that incorporates pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments; early recognizing and managing the overuse of acute pain-relieving medications; promoting undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education of healthcare professionals with specific training on headache; and promoting a culture that favors the recognition of headaches as diseases with a neurobiological basis, where this is not yet recognized. Making headache care more sustainable is an achievable objective, which will require multi-stakeholder collaborations across all sectors of society, both health-related and not health-related. Robust investments will be needed; however, considering the high prevalence of headache disorders and the associated disability, these investments will surely improve multiple health outcomes and lift development and well-being globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Matilde Leonardi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, 20133, Italy
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rami Burstein
- John Hedley-Whyte Professor of Anesthesia and Neuroscience at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Soo-Jin Cho
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Military Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea
| | | | - David W Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Hospital da Luz Lisboa., Lisbon, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Neuroalgology Unit and Headache Center, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Koventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Linz, Austria
- Headache Medical Center Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mia T Minen
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, NY, New York, USA
| | - Dimos Dimitrios Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jes Olesen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mayowa Ojo Owolabi
- Faculty of Clinical Sciences; Center for Genomic and Precision Medicine, College of Medicine,, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Todd J Schwedt
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Gianluca Serafini
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, The Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yonggang Wang
- Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Tissa Wijeratne
- Department of Neurology, Sunshine Hospital, St Albans, VIC, Australia
| | - Alberto Raggi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, Milan, 20133, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen HH, Lin CY, Chen SJ, Huang WY, Kuo CW, Chang ST. Intravascular laser irradiation of blood as novel migraine treatment: an observational study. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:457. [PMID: 37876003 PMCID: PMC10598972 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01438-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is one of four major chronic diseases that cause disability. Decreases in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) occur during migraine attacks. Laser therapy is extensively employed in treating other vascular diseases; nevertheless, its effectiveness in migraine management remains largely unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of low-level intravascular laser irradiation of blood (ILIB) therapy in patients with migraine. METHODS We performed an observational case-control study in 24 patients suffering from migraine. Patients were divided into an ILIB treatment group and a traditional rehabilitation group. This study performed clinical assessments and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) prior to and after the treatment and 1 month later. Changes in rCBF-SPECT between groups and between timepoints were compared to clinical outcomes. RESULTS Nine patients undergoing rehabilitation and fifteen patients undergoing ILIB were studied from baseline to 1 month follow-up. The ILIB group, visual analog scale for pain (P = 0.001), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (P = 0.003), and Athens Insomnia Scale (P < 0.001) symptom scores significantly improved after treatment. SPECT imaging showed a 1.27 ± 0.27 fold increase in rCBF after ILIB treatment, and no significant differences in the rehabilitation group. CONCLUSIONS Low-level ILIB therapy is associated with better clinical and vascular outcomes, and may be a feasible treatment option for migraine. Although our sample size was small, our data provide a starting point for migraine laser therapy research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsin-Hung Chen
- Department of Medical Education and Research, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, 813414, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Yu Lin
- College of Photonics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Tainan, 71150, Taiwan
| | - Shean-Jen Chen
- College of Photonics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Tainan, 71150, Taiwan
- Taiwan Instrument Research Institute, National Applied Research Laboratories, Hsinchu, 300092, Taiwan
| | - Wan-Yun Huang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Zuoying Dist, # 386, Dazhong 1St Rd, Kaohsiung, 813414, Taiwan
- Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 70119, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Wei Kuo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pingtung Veterans General Hospital, Pingtung 900, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Tsu Chang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Zuoying Dist, # 386, Dazhong 1St Rd, Kaohsiung, 813414, Taiwan.
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Neihu District, # 161, Section 6, Minquan East Road, Taipei, 114201, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Krymchantowski A, Jevoux C, Krymchantowski AG, Ramos LB, Barbosa JSS, Silva-Neto RP. Medication-overuse headache-a review of different treatment strategies. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1103497. [PMID: 37881687 PMCID: PMC10597723 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1103497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Medication-overuse headache (MOH) can develop from primary headaches. MOH is usually the result of overuse of symptomatic medications. It is a noteworthy personal and societal burden. The identification and treatment of patients at risk for MOH is an essential component of MOH management. Medication overuse can be modifiable and can advance from episodic to chronic migraine. Treatment for MOH is complex, and experts in the field have varied views on the most appropriate strategy for MOH treatment. The objective of this review is to give a comprehensive synopsis of the literature for the management of MOH. Treatment strategies, such as detoxification and prevention, are the debatable issues. Medication withdrawal is the foundation for management. The available literature suggested abrupt withdrawal with preventive approaches for early management. Bridging therapy could be useful to get relief from withdrawal symptoms. Multidisciplinary choices proved beneficial in supporting withdrawal and preventing relapse. Worldwide, the termination of overused medications has been observed as a standard treatment strategy; however, patient-specific approaches should be taken.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ljubisavljevic S, Ljubisavljevic M, Damjanovic R, Kalinic S. A Descriptive Review of Medication-Overuse Headache: From Pathophysiology to the Comorbidities. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1408. [PMID: 37891777 PMCID: PMC10605322 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13101408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is an important problem worldwide, with different areas of controversy regarding its entity. This article reviews the risk factors, comorbidities, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, effective management, and prognosis of MOH by summarizing and integrating the results and findings from previously performed more than 15,000 studies (from 2010 to 2023) available from the scientific database of the University Medical Library in the University Clinical Center of Niš, which aimed to investigate and define the complexity of this type of headache. RECENT FINDING It has been proposed that all acute migraine medications can lead to MOH, with differences in the propensity of different agents to cause the problem. Early data suggests that triptans and other painkillers used for the acute treatment of migraine may be an exception. Recent studies show that practitioners and the general public are still largely unaware of the problem of medication overuse and its damaging effects. SUMMARY Although it is likely that MOH does occur, restricting the number of acute medications is necessary to prevent it. It is also possible that increasing amounts of acute medications are simply a reflection of poorly controlled headaches rather than a cause. Further research needs to be developed to identify more precise mechanisms for effective MOH management and its evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srdjan Ljubisavljevic
- Department for Neurology, University Clinical Centre of Nis, 18000 Nis, Serbia; (M.L.); (R.D.); (S.K.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Krymchantowski A, Jevoux C, Krymchantowski AG, Silva-Néto RP. Medication Overuse Headache, Chronic Migraine and Monoclonal Antibodies Anti-CGRP: A Real-World Study. Clin Neuropharmacol 2023; 46:181-185. [PMID: 37748000 DOI: 10.1097/wnf.0000000000000559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Medication overuse headache (MOH) in chronic migraineurs may be a cause or consequence of the overuse of symptomatic medications for headache attacks. It is highly prevalent in tertiary centers. We compared the efficacy of 3 anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies with traditional pharmacological agents in patients with chronic migraine (CM) and MOH. METHODS A randomized, cross-sectional, prospective, and open trial with real-world comparison groups was carried out. The sample consisted of 100 consecutive patients having CM and MOH. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients (65 women and 23 men) were included in the study and divided into 4 groups: those having used erenumab (19.3%), galcanezumab (29.6%), fremanezumab (25%) and conventional medications, and the control group (26.1%). Ages ranged from 18 to 78 years (mean, 44.1 ± 13.6 years). In the 6 months of follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the number of headache days in the 3 groups when compared with the control ( P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The small number of patients included in each group and the open design do not allow definitive conclusions, but the use of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients with CM and MOH may result in lessening the number of headache days when compared with conventional treatment with drugs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Tepper SJ, Lipton RB, Silberstein SD, Kudrow D, Ashina M, Reuter U, Dodick DW, Wang A, Cheng S, Klatt J, Mikol DD. Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine and acute medication overuse: A subgroup analysis. Headache 2023; 63:730-742. [PMID: 37313616 DOI: 10.1111/head.14536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assess the long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine with acute medication overuse. BACKGROUND Overuse of acute medication in patients with chronic migraine has been linked to greater pain intensity and disability and may diminish the effectiveness of preventive therapies. METHODS This 52-week open-label extension study followed a 12-week double-blind placebo-controlled study in which patients with chronic migraine were randomized 3:2:2 to placebo or once-monthly erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg. Patients were stratified by region and medication overuse status. Patients received erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg throughout or switched from erenumab 70 to 140 mg (based on protocol amendment to augment safety data at higher dose). Efficacy was assessed in patients with and without medication overuse at parent study baseline. RESULTS Of 609 patients enrolled in the extension study, 252/609 (41.4%) met the criteria for medication overuse at parent study baseline. At Week 52, the mean change in monthly migraine days from parent study baseline was -9.3 (95% confidence interval: -10.4, -8.1 days) in the medication overuse subgroup versus -9.3 (-10.1, -8.5 days) in the non-medication overuse subgroup (combined erenumab doses); proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days at Week 52 was 55.9% (90/161; 48.2%, 63.3%) versus 61.3% (136/222; 54.7%, 67.4%), respectively. Among baseline users of acute migraine-specific medication, the mean change in monthly migraine-specific medication days at Week 52 was -7.4 (-8.3, -6.4 days) in the medication overuse subgroup versus -5.4 (-6.1, -4.7 days) in the non-medication overuse subgroup. Most patients (197/298; 66.1%) in the medication overuse subgroup transitioned to non-overuse status by Week 52. Erenumab 140 mg was associated with numerically greater efficacy than erenumab 70 mg across all endpoints. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION Long-term erenumab treatment demonstrated sustained efficacy and safety in patients with chronic migraine with and without acute medication overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart J Tepper
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David Kudrow
- California Medical Clinic for Headache, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - David W Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | | | | | - Jan Klatt
- Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Karaoğlan M. Three men in a boat: The comparison of the combination therapy of botulinum toxin and greater occipital nerve block with bupivacaine, with botulinum toxin monotherapy in the management of chronic migraine. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2023; 226:107609. [PMID: 36731164 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study compared the impact of the combination therapy of onabotulinum toxin A and greater occipital nerve block (GoNT-A) with onabotulinum toxin A monotherapy (BoNT-A) based on its efficacy and safety in relation to the quality of life of adult chronic migraine (CM) patients. BACKGROUND Prophylactic treatment of CM is still difficult and complex. Combination treatments do not have an evidence base yet. METHODS This retrospective study included 85 patients. For greater occipital nerve block (GONB), 4 ml of the solution prepared using 1 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 3 ml of saline on both sides were bilaterally applied to 30 patients. For BoNT-A treatment, a total of 155 units of onabotulinum toxin A (BOTOX®) was intramuscularly injected into 31 specific points around the head and neck in 27 patients. Both protocols were similarly applied to 28 patients for GoNT-A treatment. MIDAS and HIT-6 scores were evaluated to measure patients' quality of life three months after the treatment. RESULTS When MIDAS and HIT-6 score groups were statistically compared, both GONB and GoNT-A applications showed a statistically significant reduction compared to the BoNT-A application (p < 0.05). The decrease in the MIDAS and HIT-6 scores of GONB and GoNT-A applications did not show a statistical difference (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION The combination of BoNT-A and GONB was superior to BoNT-A applied as monotherapy. Alternately, no significant difference was found between GONB therapy and combination therapy in all data. Combination treatments were well tolerated.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a secondary headache disorder attributed to overuse of acute headache medications by a person with an underlying headache disorder, usually migraine or tension-type headache. MOH is common among individuals with 15 or more headache days per month. Although MOH is associated with substantial disability and reductions in quality of life, this condition is often under-recognized. As MOH is both preventable and treatable, it warrants greater attention and awareness. The diagnosis of MOH is based on the history and an unremarkable neurological examination, and is made according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition (ICHD-3). Pathophysiological mechanisms of MOH include altered descending pain modulation, central sensitization and biobehavioural factors. Treatment of MOH includes the use of headache preventive therapies, but essential to success is eliminating the cause, by reducing the frequency of use of acute headache medication, and perhaps withdrawing the overused medication altogether. Appropriate treatment is usually highly effective, leading to reduced headache burden and acute medication consumption.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Migraine affects about 1 billion people worldwide, and up to 15% of adults in the United States have migraine attacks in any given year. Migraine is associated with substantial adverse socioeconomic and personal effects. It is the second leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide for all ages and the leading cause in women aged 15 to 49 years. Diagnostic uncertainty increases the likelihood of unnecessary investigations and suboptimal management. This article advises clinicians about diagnosing migraine, ruling out secondary headache disorders, developing acute and preventive treatment plans, and deciding when to refer the patient to a specialist.
Collapse
|
19
|
Artemenko AR, Abramov VG, Bozhenkina TV, Konovalova ZN, Korenko AN, Krasavina DA, Kurenkov AL, Latysheva NV, Naprienko MV, Orlova OR, Filatova EG, Shevchenko VS, Iakovleva PN. [Botulinum toxin type A (Relatox) in transition from medication overuse to non-overuse status in patients with chronic migraine: a subgroup analysis of phase IIIb randomized single-blind multicenter active-controlled parallel-group trial]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2023; 123:64-74. [PMID: 37994890 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202312311164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To access the effect of Relatox, the first Russian botulinum toxin type A, in patients with chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse (MO). MATERIAL AND METHODS In phase IIIb single-blind randomized multicenter active-controlled parallel-group study, patients with CM were randomized to once intramuscular injections of Relatox (n=101) or onabotulinumtoxin A injections - Botox (n=108). This subgroup analysis evaluated the percentage of patients who transition from medication overuse to non overuse status from baseline; mean changes in the number of headache days, migraine headache days, acute headache medication intakes days, headache intensity, proportion of patients who had a ≥50% reduction in headache days, proportion of the patients with severe (≥60) Headache Impact Test-6 score and with a severe (≥21) MIDAS score in a 28-day periods in each treatment among patients with baseline acute medication overuse via repeated measures. RESULTS Of 209 patients with CM, 100% met medication overuse criteria. Relatox and Botox demonstrated significant improvement for overall least squares mean change in headache days, migraine headache days, headache intensity; and headache-related disability and quality of life in CM patients with baseline MO, without differences between the groups. 75% and 70% patients in the Relatox and Botox groups, respectively, achieved ≥50% reduction in headache days from baseline (OR 1.58, CI 95% 0.84; 3.02, p=0.155). Furthermore, Relatox and Botox significant reduced average medication overuse rates in patient with CM and MO at baseline. 62% of patients in the Relatox group and 48% of patients in the Botox group transitioned from medication overuse to non overuse status compared from baseline (OR 2.07, CI 95% 0.91; 4.62, p=0.044). Relatox group had greater reductions than the Botox group in the percentage of patients with acute migraine-specific medication (triptan) overuse (p=0.050). CONCLUSION The results demonstrate highly prevalent of medication overuse among individuals with CM. This analysis provides evidence that the Russian botulinum toxin type A Relatox significantly improves measures of headache symptoms, quality of life and headache-related disability, and also significantly greater, compared to Botox, reduces migraine-specific medication consumption in patients with chronic migraine who overuse acute medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Artemenko
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- LLC «Medical Center «Practical Neurology», Moscow, Russia
| | - V G Abramov
- Federal Siberian Scientific and Clinical Center, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
| | - T V Bozhenkina
- Federal Siberian Scientific and Clinical Center, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
| | - Z N Konovalova
- LLC «Central Institute of Botulinotherapy and Actual Neurology», Moscow, Russia
| | - A N Korenko
- LLC «Professorial Clinic «Oda», St. Petersburg, Russia
- Academian I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - D A Krasavina
- LLC «Professorial Clinic «Oda», St. Petersburg, Russia
- Staint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - A L Kurenkov
- LLC «Medical Center «Practical Neurology», Moscow, Russia
- National Medical Research Center for Children's Health, Moscow, Russia
| | - N V Latysheva
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- LLC «Cephalgologist», Moscow, Russia
| | - M V Naprienko
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- LLC «Cephalgologist», Moscow, Russia
| | - O R Orlova
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- LLC «Central Institute of Botulinotherapy and Actual Neurology», Moscow, Russia
| | - E G Filatova
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- LLC «Cephalgologist», Moscow, Russia
| | - V S Shevchenko
- LLC «Medical Center «Practical Neurology», Moscow, Russia
- Treatment and Rehabilitation Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - P N Iakovleva
- LLC «Central Institute of Botulinotherapy and Actual Neurology», Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Krymchantowski AV, Jevoux C, Krymchantowski AG, Silva-Néto RP. Monoclonal antibodies for chronic migraine and medication overuse headache: A real-world study. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1129439. [PMID: 36937507 PMCID: PMC10022428 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1129439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Medication-overuse headache is highly prevalent in tertiary care centers. It may be a cause or consequence of the overuse of symptomatic medications for migraine attacks. Objective We aimed to compare the efficacy of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) added to conventional pharmacological treatments in patients with chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse headache (MOH). Methods A cross-sectional, prospective, randomized, open study with real-world comparison groups of patients was carried out. The sample consisted of 200 patients with CM and MOH, who received the same approach to withdraw overused medications, started preventative treatment, and either did or did not receive mAbs. Results A total of 172 patients (126 women and 46 men) were included in the study and divided into two groups: group one consisting of 58 patients (control) and group two of 114 patients who used mAbs added to conventional pharmacological agents. The mean age was 44.1 ± 13.6 years, ranging from 18 to 78 years. In the 3 months follow-up after starting the treatment, both groups presented headache frequency reduction, but those with monoclonal antibodies had a significantly higher reduction in the number of headache days and symptomatic medication intake when compared to the control (p < 0.0001). Conclusions The addition of an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody to the treatment for medication overuse headaches in chronic migraineurs may result in decreasing headache frequency and symptomatic medication use when compared to conventional treatments with drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carla Jevoux
- Department of Neurology, Headache Center of Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Raimundo Pereira Silva-Néto
- Department of Neurology, Federal University of the Parnaíba Delta, Parnaíba, Brazil
- *Correspondence: Raimundo Pereira Silva-Néto
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Diener HC, Rizzoli P. Chronic migraine and medication overuse. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2023; 198:187-200. [PMID: 38043961 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823356-6.00008-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Though clearly described as far back as the 17th century, chronic migraine has defied precise categorization and has continued to develop as an important diagnostic concept with significant societal impact. Worldwide prevalence is estimated to be between 1% and 3%, and these patients form a dynamic group cycling between chronic and episodic migraine. Theories of pathogenesis are developing supported by recent imaging and other findings. Of the many determinants of progression to chronic migraine, overuse of acute abortive headache medications may be one of the most important modifiable factors. Treatment strategies, in addition to educational measures, have included various preventive migraine medications such as topiramate, valproate, and onabotulinumtoxinA. CGRP monoclonal antibodies are efficacious for the management of chronic migraine both with and without medication overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Christoph Diener
- Department of Neuroepidemiology, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE), Medical Faculty of the University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Paul Rizzoli
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; John R Graham Headache Center, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Diener HC, Kropp P, Dresler T, Evers S, Förderreuther S, Gaul C, Holle-Lee D, May A, Niederberger U, Moll S, Schankin C, Lampl C. Management of medication overuse (MO) and medication overuse headache (MOH) S1 guideline. Neurol Res Pract 2022; 4:37. [PMID: 36031642 PMCID: PMC9422154 DOI: 10.1186/s42466-022-00200-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Chronic headache due to the overuse of medication for the treatment of migraine attacks has a prevalence of 0.5–2.0%. This guideline provides guidance for the management of medication overuse (MO) and medication overuse headache (MOH).
Recommendations
Treatment of headache due to overuse of analgesics or specific migraine medications involves several stages. Patients with medication overuse (MO) or medication overuse headache (MOH) should be educated about the relationship between frequent use of symptomatic headache medication and the transition from episodic to chronic migraine (chronification), with the aim of reducing and limiting the use of acute medication. In a second step, migraine prophylaxis should be initiated in patients with migraine and overuse of analgesics or specific migraine drugs. Topiramate, onabotulinumtoxinA and the monoclonal antibodies against CGRP or the CGRP-receptor are effective in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse. In patients with tension-type headache, prophylaxis is performed with amitriptyline. Drug prophylaxis should be supplemented by non-drug interventions. For patients in whom education and prophylactic medication are not effective, pausing acute medication is recommended. This treatment can be performed in an outpatient, day hospital or inpatient setting. Patients with headache due to overuse of opioids should undergo inpatient withdrawal. The success rate of the stepped treatment approach is 50–70% after 6 to 12 months. A high relapse rate is observed in patients with opioid overuse. Tricyclic antidepressants, neuroleptics (antiemetics) and the administration of steroids are recommended for the treatment of withdrawal symptoms or headaches during the medication pause. Consistent patient education and further close monitoring reduce the risk of relapse.
Collapse
|
23
|
Chiang CC, Halker Singh RB. Acute Treatment of Headache (Focus on Migraine). Semin Neurol 2022; 42:494-502. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAcute treatments for migraine and cluster headache are necessary to abort attacks, relieve pain and associated symptoms, and restore an individual's ability to function. Acute headache treatments consist of a variety of medication and nonmedication options. In this article, we discuss the approach to acute treatment of migraine and cluster headache. We summarize the level of evidence to support each acute medication class according to recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses, as well as guideline recommendations from the American Headache Society, American Academy of Neurology, and European Federation of Neurological Society.
Collapse
|
24
|
Begasse de Dhaem O, Rizzoli P. Refractory Headaches. Semin Neurol 2022; 42:512-522. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractMedication overuse headache (MOH), new daily persistent headache (NDPH), and persistent refractory headache attributed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection represent a significant burden in terms of disability and quality of life, and a challenge in terms of definition, pathophysiology, and treatment. Regarding MOH, prevention without withdrawal is not inferior to prevention with withdrawal. Preventive medications like topiramate, onabotulinumtoxinA, and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies improve chronic migraine with MOH regardless of withdrawal. The differential diagnosis of NDPH is broad and should be carefully examined. There are no guidelines for the treatment of NDPH, but options include a short course of steroids, nerve blocks, topiramate, nortriptyline, gabapentin, CGRP monoclonal antibodies, and onabotulinumtoxinA. The persistence of headache 3 months after SARS-CoV2 infection is a predictor of poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Begasse de Dhaem
- Headache Specialist at Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, Connecticut
- Department of Neurology at the University of Connecticut, Milford, Connecticut
| | - Paul Rizzoli
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital J Graham Headache Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Guerzoni S, Baraldi C, Pensato U, Favoni V, Lo Castro F, Cainazzo MM, Cevoli S, Pani L. Chronic migraine evolution after 3 months from erenumab suspension: real-world-evidence-life data. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:3823-3830. [DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-05870-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
26
|
Therapies targeting CGRP signaling for medication overuse headache. Curr Opin Neurol 2022; 35:353-359. [PMID: 35674079 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Medication overuse headache (MOH) affects more than 60 million individuals worldwide causing enormous personal and social burden. Only repurposed drugs are available for MOH that share limited evidence for efficacy. The preclinical data suggesting that activation of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway is involved in headache chronification along with clinical evidence that monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs) have good efficacy in preventing chronic migraine, triggered this review that aims to summarize the current data on the effectiveness and safety of mAbs against CGRP in MOH. RECENT FINDINGS Post hoc analyses of phase-3 trials of erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab for the prevention of chronic migraine revealed that patients with MOH benefit from the treatment over placebo. Several real-world studies confirm the efficacy of erenumab and galcanezumab in patients with MO. However, all published trials evaluated treatments in patients with chronic migraine with MO collectively, not in patients with MOH exclusively. SUMMARY The available data indicate that anti-CGRP mAbs represent a good mechanism-based and disease-specific therapeutical option with for MOH as long as detoxification and additional nonpharmaceutical interventions are operated. Future research should focus on long-term-controlled trials in MOH populations exclusively.
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang YF, Wang SJ. CGRP Targeting Therapy for Chronic Migraine-Evidence from Clinical Trials and Real-world Studies. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:543-554. [PMID: 35567661 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01056-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor have become part of the standard treatment for migraine in clinical practice. The current review focuses on the clinical evidence of CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients with chronic migraine (CM), including more challenging cases. RECENT FINDINGS CGRP monoclonal antibodies were more effective than placebo in reducing the number of monthly migraine days (MMDs), and the change relative to placebo in the treatment group was between - 1.2 and - 2.7 days at 3 months. CGRP monoclonal antibodies resulted in ≥ 50% response in 27.5 to 61.4% of patients, and doubled the odds for having ≥ 50% response. The findings were generally consistent in patients with coexisting medication overuse or with treatment failures to multiple preventive medications, including onabotulinumtoxinA. The results from real-world studies (RWS) were similar to those seen in clinical trials, and the changes from baseline in the number of MMDs and the response rates largely fell within the ranges of those reported in the treatment group in pivotal trials. The therapeutic effects typically started within a few days, and remained steady after regular treatment for up to 1 year. These agents were generally well tolerated, and the discontinuation rates due to adverse events in clinical trials and in many RWS were < 4.5%. CGRP monoclonal antibodies are effective and safe in the treatment of patients with CM, including clinical challenging cases. However, the role of CGRP monoclonal antibodies in a number of conditions, such as cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, pregnancy, and overuse of opioids or barbiturates, needs to be further clarified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Feng Wang
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shi-Pai Road, Bei-Tou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan. .,College of Medicine National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan. .,Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shi-Pai Road, Bei-Tou District, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.,College of Medicine National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Schwedt TJ, Robert T, Dodick DW. Treatment of chronic migraine with medication overuse: A perspective. Headache 2022; 62:642-644. [DOI: 10.1111/head.14314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Teri Robert
- Patient Advocate and Educator Washington West Virginia USA
| | - David W. Dodick
- Department of Neurology Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Atria Institute New York New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schwedt TJ, Hentz JG, Sahai-Srivastava S, Murinova N, Spare NM, Treppendahl C, Martin VT, Birlea M, Digre K, Watson D, Leonard M, Robert T, Dodick DW. Patient-Centered Treatment of Chronic Migraine With Medication Overuse: A Prospective, Randomized, Pragmatic Clinical Trial. Neurology 2022; 98:e1409-e1421. [PMID: 35169011 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Overuse of symptomatic (i.e., acute) medications is common among those with chronic migraine. It is associated with developing frequent headaches, medication side effects, and reduced quality of life. The optimal treatment strategy for patients who have chronic migraine with medication overuse (CMMO) has long been debated. The study objective was to determine whether migraine preventive therapy without switching or limiting the frequency of the overused medication was noninferior to migraine preventive therapy with switching from the overused medication to an alternative medication that could be used on ≤2 d/wk. METHODS The Medication Overuse Treatment Strategy (MOTS) trial was an open-label, pragmatic clinical trial, randomizing adult participants 1:1 to migraine preventive medication and (1) switching from the overused medication to an alternative used ≤2 d/wk or (2) continuation of the overused medication with no maximum limit. Participants were enrolled between February 2017 and December 2020 from 34 clinics in the United States, including headache specialty, general neurology, and primary care clinics. The primary outcome was moderate to severe headache day frequency during weeks 9 to 12 and subsequently during weeks 1 to 2 after randomization. RESULTS Seven hundred twenty participants were randomized; average age was 44 (SD 13) years; and 87.5% were female. At baseline, participants averaged 22.5 (SD 5.1) headache days over 4 weeks, including 12.8 (SD 6.7) moderate to severe headache days and 21.4 (SD 5.8) days of symptomatic medication use. Migraine preventive medication without switching of the overused medication was not inferior to preventive medication with switching for moderate to severe headache day frequency during weeks 9 to 12 (switching 9.3 [SD 7.2] vs no switching 9.1 [SD 6.8]; p = 0.75, 95% CI -1.0 to 1.3). The treatment strategies also provided similar outcomes during the first 2 weeks (switching 6.6 [SD 3.7] moderate to severe headaches days vs no switching 6.4 [SD 3.6]; p = 0.57, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.7). DISCUSSION When reduction in moderate to severe headache days was used as the outcome of interest for the management of CMMO, migraine preventive medication without switching or limiting symptomatic medication is not inferior to migraine preventive medication with switching to a different symptomatic medication with a maximum limit of 2 treatment days per week. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02764320. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class III evidence that, for patients who have CMMO, migraine preventive medication without switching or limiting the overused medication is noninferior to migraine preventive medication with switching and limiting symptomatic medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd J Schwedt
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV.
| | - Joseph G Hentz
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - Soma Sahai-Srivastava
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - Natalia Murinova
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - Nicole M Spare
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - Christina Treppendahl
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - Vincent T Martin
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - Marius Birlea
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - Kathleen Digre
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - David Watson
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - Michael Leonard
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - Teri Robert
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | - David W Dodick
- From the Department of Neurology (T.J.S., J.G.H., M.L., D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Neurology (S.S.-S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (N.M.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Neurology (N.M.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; The Headache Center (C.T.), Ridgeland, MS; Department of Internal Medicine (V.T.M.), University of Cincinnati, OH; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Colorado, Denver; Department of Neurology (K.D.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Department of Neurology (D.W.), West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown; and patient advocate and educator (T.R.), Washington, WV
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Scher AI, Bendtsen L. Patient-Centered Treatment of Chronic Migraine With Medication Overuse: More Is Not Always Better. Neurology 2022; 98:563-564. [PMID: 35169016 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ann I Scher
- From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics (A.I.S.), Uniformed Services University, Bethesda MD; Department of Neurology (L.B.), Danish Headache Centre, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Lars Bendtsen
- From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics (A.I.S.), Uniformed Services University, Bethesda MD; Department of Neurology (L.B.), Danish Headache Centre, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Comparative Impact of Pharmacological Therapies on Cluster Headache Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11051411. [PMID: 35268502 PMCID: PMC8911224 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
It is important to find effective and safe pharmacological options for managing cluster headache (CH) because there is limited evidence from studies supporting the general efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) analyzed published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments in patients with CH. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched to identify RCTs that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for CH. Efficacy outcomes included frequency and duration of attacks, pain-free rate, and the use of rescue agents. Safety outcomes were evaluated based on the number of patients who experienced adverse events. A total of 23 studies were included in the analysis. The frequency of attacks was reduced (mean difference (MD) = −1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −1.62 to −0.47; p = 0.0004), and the pain-free rate was increased (odds ratio (OR) = 3.89, 95% CI = 2.76−5.48; p < 0.00001) in the pharmacological treatment group, with a lower frequency of rescue agent use than the placebo group. Preventive, acute, and triptan or non-triptan therapies did not show significant differences in efficacy (p > 0.05). In the NMA, different results were shown among the interventions; for example, zolmitriptan 5 mg was more effective than zolmitriptan 10 mg in the pain-free outcome (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.19−0.82; p < 0.05). Pharmacological treatment was shown to be more effective than placebo to manage CH with differences among types of therapies and individual interventions, and it was consistently shown to be associated with the development of adverse events. Thus, individualized therapy approaches should be applied to treat CH in real-world practice.
Collapse
|
32
|
Pensato U, Baraldi C, Favoni V, Mascarella D, Matteo E, Andrini G, Cainazzo MM, Cortelli P, Pierangeli G, Guerzoni S, Cevoli S. Detoxification vs non-detoxification before starting an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody in medication overuse headache. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:645-653. [PMID: 35135357 PMCID: PMC9109244 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211067791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Medication overuse headache significantly contributes to the chronification process and treatment refractoriness of migraine. Currently, abrupt discontinuation of the overused medication still represents the best management strategy for these patients, challenging public health system resources. Methods In this prospective study, chronic migraine and medication overuse headache sufferers with at least 28 days of analgesic consumption per month were included. Assessment of efficacy outcomes at three months were compared among patients who underwent in-hospital abrupt discontinuation of overused acute medication (YES-DETOX group) and patients who did not (NO-DETOX group) before starting an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody. Results Of 401 patients who received either erenumab or galcanezumab, 28% (n = 111) satisfied inclusion criteria (YES-DETOX n = 28; NO-DETOX n = 83). After three months of treatment, 59% (n = 65; 47/83 YES-DETOX; 18/28 NO-DETOX) patients reverted from medication overuse headache and 51% (n = 57; 42/83 YES-DETOX; 15/28 NO-DEOTX) achieved ≥50% reduction in monthly headache days; yet no statistical differences were observed between the two groups (p = 0.4788 and p = 0.8393, respectively). Monthly consumption of pain medication was the only baseline prognostic factor in multivariate analysis in the overall cohort (p = 0.016). Conclusion Our results support the emerging evidence that anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies may be effective in medication overuse headache patients irrespective of detoxification, yet further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Pensato
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Valentina Favoni
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide Mascarella
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eleonora Matteo
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgia Andrini
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Michela Cainazzo
- Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pietro Cortelli
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Pierangeli
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pijpers JA, Kies DA, van Zwet EW, Rosendaal FR, Terwindt GM. Behavioural intervention in medication overuse headache: a concealed double‐blind randomised controlled trial a concealed double‐blind randomised controlled trial a concealed double‐blind randomised controlled trial. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:1496-1504. [PMID: 35064733 PMCID: PMC9306639 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose Medication overuse headache is a prevalent disorder, with a strong biobehavioural component. Hence, behavioural interventions might effectuate reduction of the overused medication. We assessed in a double‐blind manner the efficacy of a behavioural intervention during medication withdrawal therapy. Methods In this concealed, double‐blind, randomized controlled trial in medication overuse headache, conducted at the Leiden University Medical Centre, we compared the effect of maximal versus minimal behavioural intervention by a headache nurse during withdrawal therapy. Maximal intervention consisted of an intensive contact schedule, comprising education, motivational interviewing, and value‐based activity planning during 12 weeks of withdrawal therapy. Minimal intervention consisted of a short contact only. Patients were unaware of the existence of these treatment arms, as the trial was concealed in another trial investigating botulinum toxin A. Endpoints were successful withdrawal and monthly days of acute medication use after the withdrawal period. Results We enrolled 179 patients (90 maximal, 89 minimal intervention). At Week 12, most patients achieved withdrawal in both groups (82/90 [93%] maximal intervention vs. 75/89 [86%] minimal intervention, odds ratio = 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83–7.23, p = 0.107). At Week 24, patients in the maximal intervention group had fewer medication days (mean difference = −2.23, 95% CI = −3.76 to −0.70, p = 0.005). This difference receded over time. Change in monthly migraine days did not differ between groups (−6.75 vs. −6.22). Conclusions This trial suggests modest benefit of behavioural intervention by a headache nurse during withdrawal therapy for medication overuse headache, to reduce acute medication use during and shortly after intervention, but extension seems warranted for a prolonged effect
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith A Pijpers
- Dept. Neurology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Kies
- Dept. Neurology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
- Dept. Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Erik W van Zwet
- Dept. Medical Statistics Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Frits R. Rosendaal
- Dept. Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Dept. Neurology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Migraine is a common, chronic, disorder that is typically characterized by recurrent disabling attacks of headache and accompanying symptoms, including aura. The aetiology is multifactorial with rare monogenic variants. Depression, epilepsy, stroke and myocardial infarction are comorbid diseases. Spreading depolarization probably causes aura and possibly also triggers trigeminal sensory activation, the underlying mechanism for the headache. Despite earlier beliefs, vasodilation is only a secondary phenomenon and vasoconstriction is not essential for antimigraine efficacy. Management includes analgesics or NSAIDs for mild attacks, and, for moderate or severe attacks, triptans or 5HT1B/1D receptor agonists. Because of cardiovascular safety concerns, unreliable efficacy and tolerability issues, use of ergots to abort attacks has nearly vanished in most countries. CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) and lasmiditan, a selective 5HT1F receptor agonist, have emerged as effective acute treatments. Intramuscular onabotulinumtoxinA may be helpful in chronic migraine (migraine on ≥15 days per month) and monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor, as well as two gepants, have proven effective and well tolerated for the preventive treatment of migraine. Several neuromodulation modalities have been approved for acute and/or preventive migraine treatment. The emergence of new treatment targets and therapies illustrates the bright future for migraine management.
Collapse
|
35
|
OUP accepted manuscript. PAIN MEDICINE 2022; 23:1536-1543. [DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
36
|
Azimova Y, Amelin A, Alferova V, Artemenko A, Akhmadeeva L, Golovacheva V, Danilov A, Ekusheva E, Isagulian E, Koreshkina M, Kurushina O, Latysheva N, Lebedeva E, Naprienko M, Osipova V, Pavlov N, Parfenov V, Rachin A, Sergeev A, Skorobogatykh K, Tabeeva G, Filatova E. Clinical guidelines "Migraine". Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2022. [DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20221220134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
37
|
Azimova Y, Alferova V, Amelin A, Artemenko A, Akhmadeeva L, Ekusheva E, Karakulova Y, Koreshkina M, Kurushina O, Latysheva N, Lebedeva E, Naprienko M, Osipova V, Pavlov N, Parfenov V, Rachin A, Sergeev A, Skorobogatykh K, Tabeeva G, Filatova E. Clinical Guidelines for Headache Stress (HBS). Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2022. [DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20221220234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
38
|
Kong F, Buse DC, Geng J, Xu J, Liu H, Ma S. Efficacy and tolerability of oral gastrodin for medication overuse headache (EASTERN): Study protocol for a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1095298. [PMID: 36910863 PMCID: PMC9993247 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1095298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Prophylactic medication in clinical detoxification programs for the treatment of medication overuse headache is still debated. Gastrodin, a main bioactive constituent of Rhizoma Gastrodiae, has been applied clinically to treat primary headache for more than 30 years in China due to its potential analgesic and anti-migraine mechanisms. However, clinical evidence supporting its routing use in MOH is insufficient. The present study aims to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of oral gastrodin in medication overuse headache. Methods A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled trial will be performed. A target sample size of 186 patients who fulfill the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd version (ICHD-3) criteria for MOH will be recruited and screened during a baseline screening period of 28 days before being randomly assigned to either the gastrodin or placebo group at a ratio of 1:1. Enrolled patients will be assessed for each 4 weeks during the 12-weeks double-blind phase and followed up at week 24. The primary endpoint is mean change in monthly headache day frequency. Secondary endpoints will be the proportion of remitted MOH, change in headache pain intensity, headache impact test (HIT-6) score, 50% responder rate, treatment failure, monthly acute medication intake days, and Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) score. Tolerability will be assessed by drop-out rates though safety monitoring during treatment. Discussion The findings of the present study may help to provide new evidence on gastrodin as a prophylaxis treatment with both efficacy and high tolerability for the treatment of MOH. Clinical trail registration Chinese Clinical Trail Registry (ChiCTR2200063719), Protocol Version 1.1, May, 09, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanyi Kong
- Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Jia Geng
- Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital and Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jingjing Xu
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Changde Hospital, Changde, Hunan, China
| | - Hanxiang Liu
- Department of Neurology, Puer People's Hospital, Puer, Yunnan, China
| | - Shu Ma
- Department of Neurology, 920th Hospital of Logistics Support Force, People's Liberation Army, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Park HK, Cho SJ. Comprehensive approach for the treatment of medication-overuse headache. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2021. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2021.64.12.843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders as a headache in patients with a pre-existing primary headache disorder that occurs on 15 or more days per month for more than 3 months. It is caused by overuse of medication for acute or symptomatic headache treatment. Regular and frequent use of acute or symptomatic medications can worsen headaches and lead to chronic headache or MOH. MOH is a burdensome medical condition that is difficult to treat, and the frequent recurrence of headaches may result in disability in individuals and impair socioeconomic outcomes.Current Concepts: Awareness of MOH and the education of patients, the general population, and healthcare providers are important for the first step of treatment. Scientific research regarding the treatment of MOH has been published in the past few years.Discussion and Conclusion: Physicians should educate and counsel patients to stop or at least reduce the intake of acute or symptomatic medications that can be discontinued abruptly or tapered slowly. During the period after the discontinuation of the overused medications, some withdrawal symptoms including headache might be manageable with bridging therapy. Evidence-based preventive therapies including anticonvulsants (topiramate and divalproex sodium), botulinum toxin A, and medications acting by antagonism of the calcitonin generelated peptide pathway might be helpful in patients with MOH for both avoiding the overused medication and preventing the relapse of overuse. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach may improve the outcomes of patients with MOH.
Collapse
|
40
|
Oraby MI, Soliman RH, Mahmoud MA, Elfar E, Abd ElMonem NA. Migraine prevalence, clinical characteristics, and health care-seeking practice in a sample of medical students in Egypt. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s41983-021-00282-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Migraine is a common disabling primary headache disorder with significant personal and socio-economic impacts. Medical students usually have multiple triggers for migraine, particularly stress and irregular sleep.
Objective
To assess the prevalence, characteristics, and degree of disability of migraine in a sample of Egyptian medical students and to study their health care-seeking practice when having migraine
Patients and methods
A descriptive cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study included 631 undergraduate medical students enrolled in the Faculty of Medicine. Participants’ sociodemographic data, migraine prevalence, characteristic, migraine disability, and health care-seeking practice were evaluated. By using the MIDAS test in the questionnaire, we assessed the impact of migraine headache on the daily activities of the students. The severity of headache was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores.
Results
Prevalence of migraine in medical students was found to be 17.9% causing moderate disability. Migraine was significantly more prevalent and caused more disability among female students compared to males (p value 0.001 and 0.001). Only 35.4% of the migraineurs had already seen doctors for their migraine, and self-prescription of medications for migraine was practiced by 58.4%. Statistically significant positive correlation was found between migraine frequency, migraine severity, and low academic performance (p value 0.001 and 0.003 respectively).
Conclusion
Migraine is highly prevalent among medical students with predominant female prevalence and has a negative impact on their academic performance and other activities.
Collapse
|
41
|
Park HK, Chu MK, Oh SY, Moon HS, Song TJ, Lee MJ, Kang JJ, Hong Y, Cho SJ. Interim analysis of the Registry for Load and Management of Medication Overuse Headache (RELEASE): A multicenter, comprehensive medication overuse headache registry. Cephalalgia 2021; 42:455-465. [PMID: 34786971 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211057184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Characteristics, disabilities, and optimal management of medication overuse headache remain uncertain. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics of patients with medication overuse headache enrolled in a medication overuse headache registry in Korea. METHODS The Registry for Load and Management of MEdicAtion OveruSE Headache (RELEASE), a cross-sectional prospective observational study including seven referral headache centers in Korea, started enrolling adult patients with medication overuse headache in April 2020. Data included information on headache characteristics, burden on daily function, depression, anxiety, history of acute and preventive medications, and treatment strategies. RESULTS A total of 229 patients (85.6% females; mean age, 45.5 ± 13.5 years) were enrolled by June 2021. The average durations of chronic headaches and medication overuse were 6.5 and 4.3 years, respectively. In the past month before enrollment, patients had headaches for 25 days and severe headaches for 12 days, and used acute medications for 20 days. Patients were disabled in 66.8 days in the past 3 months and had moderate/severe depression and anxiety in 56% and 35%, respectively. The proportion of patients on preventive treatments increased from 38% to 93% during the study period. CONCLUSIONS RELEASE study reflects the current management status and opportunities to improve the quality of care in patients with medication overuse headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Kyun Park
- Department of Neurology, 119750Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Min Kyung Chu
- Department of Neurology, 54678Severance Hospital, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Oh
- Department of Neurology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Heui-Soo Moon
- Department of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Jin Song
- Department of Neurology, Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Ju Kang
- Department of Neurology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Yooha Hong
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Soo-Jin Cho
- Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
D’Amico D, Grazzi L, Guastafierro E, Sansone E, Leonardi M, Raggi A. Withdrawal failure in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache. Acta Neurol Scand 2021; 144:408-417. [PMID: 34036572 PMCID: PMC8453823 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The management of chronic migraine (CM) with Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) consists of withdrawal therapy, education on medications’ use and prescription of prophylaxis. Little attention has been given to patients who fail in achieving a successful short‐term outcome after withdrawal: we aim to describe predictors of failure. Methods Patients with CM and MOH were enrolled at the Neurological Institute C. Besta of Milano, and included if they completed the three months follow‐up. Withdrawal failure was defined as the situation in which patients either did not revert from chronic to episodic migraine (EM), were still overusing acute medications, or both did not revert to EM and kept overusing acute medications. Predictors of failure were addressed with a logistic regression, and for all variables, the longitudinal course in the two groups was described. Results In 39, out of 137 patients, withdrawal was unsuccessful: the predictors included day‐hospital‐based withdrawal (OR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.06–5.29), emergency room (ER) access before withdrawal (OR: 2.81; 95% CI: 1.13–6.94) and baseline headache frequency >69 days/three months (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 1.32–6.65). Patients who failed withdrawal did not improve on medications intake, use of prophylactic and non‐pharmacological treatments, symptoms of anxiety and depression. Conclusions Patients who were treated in day‐hospital, those who recently attended ER for headache, and those with more than 69 headache/3 months, as well as to those with relevant symptoms of anxiety and depression who did not improve should be closely monitored to reduce likelihood of non‐improvement after structured withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico D’Amico
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta Dipartimento Neuroalgologia Centro Cefalee Milano Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta Dipartimento Neuroalgologia Centro Cefalee Milano Italy
| | - Erika Guastafierro
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta UO Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità Milano Italy
| | - Emanuela Sansone
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta UO Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità Milano Italy
| | - Matilde Leonardi
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta UO Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità Milano Italy
| | - Alberto Raggi
- Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta UO Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità Milano Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Marmura MJ, Diener HC, Cowan RP, Tepper SJ, Diamond ML, Starling AJ, Hirman J, Mehta L, Brevig T, Cady R. Preventive migraine treatment with eptinezumab reduced acute headache medication and headache frequency to below diagnostic thresholds in patients with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache. Headache 2021; 61:1421-1431. [PMID: 34551130 PMCID: PMC9291601 DOI: 10.1111/head.14206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective This post hoc analysis in patients medically diagnosed with chronic migraine (CM) and medication‐overuse headache (MOH) evaluated reductions in the use of acute headache medication (AHM) and sustained changes in the diagnostic status of CM and MOH following eptinezumab treatment in the PROMISE‐2 study. Background Eptinezumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits calcitonin gene‐related peptide, is approved in the United States for the preventive treatment of migraine. A previous analysis showed that eptinezumab reduced monthly migraine days and was well tolerated in the subgroup of PROMISE‐2 patients diagnosed with both CM and MOH. Methods The phase 3, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled PROMISE‐2 study (NCT02974153) randomized adults with CM to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo (administered intravenously every 12 weeks for up to two doses). MOH was prospectively diagnosed at screening by trained physicians based on 3 months of medication history and International Classification of Headache Disorders‐3β criteria. This post hoc analysis evaluated changes in total and class‐specific days of AHM usage, the percentage of patients using AHM at or above MOH diagnostic thresholds, and the percentage of patients experiencing monthly headache and migraine day frequency below diagnostic thresholds for MOH and/or CM. Results In PROMISE‐2, 431/1072 (40.2%) patients with CM were diagnosed with MOH (eptinezumab 100 mg, n = 139; 300 mg, n = 147; placebo, n = 145) and were included in this analysis. Total monthly AHM use decreased from 20.6 days/month at baseline to 10.6 days/month over 24 weeks of treatment (49% decrease) with eptinezumab 100 mg, from 20.7 to 10.5 days/month (49% decrease) with eptinezumab 300 mg, and from 19.8 to 14.0 days/month (29% decrease) with placebo. Numerically greater decreases from baseline with eptinezumab were also observed for individual drug classes. In each study month, the percentages of patients who were below MOH thresholds were numerically higher for both eptinezumab doses compared with placebo, as were the percentages of patients experiencing headache and migraine frequency below CM thresholds. Of patients with available data across the entire treatment period, 29.0% (58/200) of patients treated with eptinezumab stopped meeting and remained below diagnostic thresholds for both CM and MOH during Weeks 1–24, as well as 6.3% (6/96) of patients who received placebo. Conclusions Across 24 weeks of treatment, eptinezumab reduced AHM use in patients diagnosed with CM and MOH. More than one‐fourth (29%) of patients treated with eptinezumab did not meet the diagnostic thresholds for either CM or MOH for the entire treatment period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Marmura
- Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Robert P Cowan
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Headache and Facial Pain Program, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Stewart J Tepper
- Department of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | | | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc., Woodinville, Washington, USA
| | - Lahar Mehta
- Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals, Inc., Bothell, Washington, USA
| | | | - Roger Cady
- Lundbeck La Jolla Research Center, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Vélez-Jiménez MK, Chiquete-Anaya E, Orta DSJ, Villarreal-Careaga J, Amaya-Sánchez LE, Collado-Ortiz MÁ, Diaz-García ML, Gudiño-Castelazo M, Hernández-Aguilar J, Juárez-Jiménez H, León-Jiménez C, Loy-Gerala MDC, Marfil-Rivera A, Antonio Martínez-Gurrola M, Martínez-Mayorga AP, Munive-Báez L, Nuñez-Orozo L, Ojeda-Chavarría MH, Partida-Medina LR, Pérez-García JC, Quiñones-Aguilar S, Reyes-Álvarez MT, Rivera-Nava SC, Torres-Oliva B, Vargas-García RD, Vargas-Méndez R, Vega-Boada F, Vega-Gaxiola SB, Villegas-Peña H, Rodriguez-Leyva I. Comprehensive management of adults with chronic migraine: Clinical practice guidelines in Mexico. CEPHALALGIA REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/25158163211033969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Migraine is a polygenic multifactorial disorder with a neuronal initiation of a cascade of neurochemical processes leading to incapacitating headaches. Headaches are generally unilateral, throbbing, 4–72 h in duration, and associated with nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and sonophobia. Chronic migraine (CM) is the presence of a headache at least 15 days per month for ≥3 months and has a high global impact on health and economy, and therapeutic guidelines are lacking. Methods: Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system, we conducted a search in MEDLINE and Cochrane to investigate the current evidence and generate recommendations of clinical practice on the identification of risk factors and treatment of CM in adults. Results: We recommend avoiding overmedication of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); ergotamine; caffeine; opioids; barbiturates; and initiating individualized prophylactic treatment with topiramate eptinezumab, galcanezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, or botulinum toxin. We highlight the necessity of managing comorbidities initially. In the acute management, we recommend NSAIDs, triptans, lasmiditan, and gepants alone or with metoclopramide if nausea or vomiting. Non-pharmacological measures include neurostimulation. Conclusions: We have identified the risk factors and treatments available for the management of CM based on a grading system, which facilitates selection for individualized management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erwin Chiquete-Anaya
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, México
| | - Daniel San Juan Orta
- Department of Clinical Research of the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Dr. Manuel Velazco Suárez”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Luis Enrique Amaya-Sánchez
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional SXXI Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Miguel Ángel Collado-Ortiz
- Staff physician of the hospital and the Neurological Center ABC (The American British Cowdray Hospital IAP, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Juan Hernández-Aguilar
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Infantil de México. Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Carolina León-Jiménez
- Department of Neurology, ISSSTE Regional Hospital, “Dr. Valentin Gomez Farías”, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
| | | | - Alejandro Marfil-Rivera
- Headache and Chronic Pain Clinic, Neurology Service, Hospital Univrsitario Autónoma de Nuevo Leon, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Adriana Patricia Martínez-Mayorga
- Department of Neurology, Central Hospital “Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto”, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi, SLP, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Lilia Nuñez-Orozo
- Department of Neurology, National Medical Center 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Luis Roberto Partida-Medina
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Medico Nacional de Occidente, IMSS, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Felipe Vega-Boada
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, México
| | | | - Hilda Villegas-Peña
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Clínica de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Ildefonso Rodriguez-Leyva
- Department of Neurology, Central Hospital “Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto”, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi, SLP, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bentivegna E, Luciani M, Paragliola V, Baldari F, Lamberti PA, Conforti G, Spuntarelli V, Martelletti P. Recent advancements in tension-type headache: a narrative review. Expert Rev Neurother 2021; 21:793-803. [PMID: 34128449 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1943363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most common primary headache disorder with a prevalence of up to 78% in general population and huge expenses in terms of health service. Despite its high incidence and impact on life's quality the knowledge on the pathophysiology and efficacious treatment of TTH was still limited. AREAS COVERED In recent years, a series of studies highlighted the heterogeneous nature of this pathology that seems to be determined by a complex interaction between genetic, environmental, and neuromuscular factors, which result in nociceptive system activation. In this setting, alongside the simple analgesic therapies used during the acute attack, a series of therapeutic options based on newly acquired experiences have taken hold. EXPERT REVIEW Not having a single substrate or a typical site of pathophysiology, TTH must be analyzed in a global and multidisciplinary way. Herein, we perform a narrative review of the most recent advancement stimulating the concept of this disease as the tip of the iceberg of a more complex individual malaise secondary to different alterations. Strategies based solely on symptomatic drugs should therefore be avoided by experienced personnel and treatment should aim at taking charge of the patient considering the processes behind this complex pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Bentivegna
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Paragliola
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Baldari
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Piera A Lamberti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Conforti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Spuntarelli
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.,Department of clicinal and molecular medicine, Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
OnabotulinumtoxinA in Migraine: A Review of the Literature and Factors Associated with Efficacy. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10132898. [PMID: 34209849 PMCID: PMC8269087 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA (OnaB-A) as a preventative treatment for chronic migraine, emerging fortuitously from clinical observation is now supported by class one evidence and over two decades of real-world clinical data. There is still limited ability to predict a clinically meaningful response to OnaB-A for individual patients, however. This review summarises briefly the proposed mechanism of OnaB-A in chronic migraine, the literature of predictors of clinical response, and recent developments in the field.
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article provides an overview of preventive interventions for migraine, including when to start and how to choose a treatment, pharmacologic options (both older oral treatments and new monoclonal antibodies to calcitonin gene-related peptide [CGRP] or its receptor), nonpharmacologic treatment such as neuromodulation, and preventive treatment of refractory migraine. RECENT FINDINGS The migraine preventive treatment landscape has been transformed by the development of monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor. These treatments, which are given subcutaneously or intravenously monthly or quarterly, have high efficacy and were well tolerated in clinical trials. Emerging real-world studies have found higher rates of adverse events than were seen in clinical trials. They are currently recommended for use if two traditional preventive therapies have proven inadequate. Since the commonly cited 2012 American Headache Society/American Academy of Neurology migraine prevention guidelines were released, clinical trials supporting the preventive use of lisinopril, candesartan, and memantine have been published. Neuromodulation devices, including external trigeminal nerve stimulation and single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation devices, have modest evidence to support preventive use. The American Headache Society/American Academy of Neurology guidelines for the preventive treatment of migraine are currently being updated. A new class of oral CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) is being tested for migraine prevention. SUMMARY Successful preventive treatment of migraine reduces disease burden and improves quality of life. Many pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment options are available for the prevention of migraine, including newer therapies aimed at the CGRP pathway as well as older treatments with good evidence for efficacy. Multiple treatment trials may be required to find the best preventive for an individual patient.
Collapse
|
48
|
Li C, Li Y, Ma M, Zhang Y, Bao J, Ge W, Liu Y, Peng C, He L. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on headache symptoms and drug withdrawal among patients with medication overuse headache: a cross-sectional study. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:41. [PMID: 34020588 PMCID: PMC8139545 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01256-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) bring about a range of psychological distress and symptom deterioration to headache patients especially to some migraineurs. Compared to migraineurs or normal control, medication overuse headache (MOH) patients are more likely to experience a worse psychological distress and poorer outcome in non-COVID-19 time. However, in COVID-19 pandemic, whether MOH patients would have greater physical and mental symptom deterioration or worse relief of headache symptoms and medications overuse remained unclear. We aim to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on MOH patients to guide for a better management in this study. Methods We enrolled MOH patients who were diagnosed and treated at headache clinic of West China Hospital. Information of the pre-pandemic 3 months period and COVID-19 pandemic period was collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify independent factors associated with changes in headache symptoms and drug withdrawal. Results Seventy-eight MOH patients were enrolled into the study ultimately. In comparison to pre-pandemic period, fewer MOH patients reported decreased headache days, intensity and days with acute medications per month during the pandemic. Available access to regular prophylactic medications was significantly associated with a reduction of at least 50% in headache days and decrease in headache intensity per month with respective odds ratios of 39.19 (95% CI 3.75–409.15, P = 0.002) and 10.13 (95% CI 2.33–44.12, P = 0.002). Following abrupt withdrawal and high educational level were both significant factors in decreasing headache intensity. Male sex was significantly associated with decrease in days with acute medication per month during the pandemic (odds ratios 4.78, 95%CI 1.44–15.87, P = 0.011). Conclusions Our findings reflect that MOH patients experienced a worse relief of headache symptoms and drug withdrawal during the pandemic. Available access to regular prophylactic medications was the significant independent factor for improvement of headache symptoms. Male sex was significantly associated with decreased days with acute medications per month.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changling Li
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Yanbo Li
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Mengmeng Ma
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Jiajia Bao
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Wenjing Ge
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Yanqin Liu
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Cheng Peng
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Li He
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
VanderPluym J, Gautreaux J, Burch R, Whitaker E, Roberts J, Turner DP, Gelfand AA. Evidence Regarding Medication Overuse Headache in Children and Adolescents: Protocol for a Systematic Review. Headache 2021; 60:171-177. [PMID: 31913513 DOI: 10.1111/head.13726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This proposed systematic review will identify the existing evidence on medication-overuse headache in children and adolescents. BACKGROUND A number of medications have been shown to be effective for acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents. However, patients may find they need to use their acute medications more frequently when migraine frequency is high. This has led to concern about their potential to develop medication-overuse headache. METHODS We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases from their inception to present time. We will also search conference proceedings of the last 4 scientific meetings of relevant societies and scan the reference lists of studies identified through the search. Study designs will include case series, cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, and interventional studies. Participants will include children and adolescents under 18 years of age with primary headache disorders. We aim to determine whether frequency of acute medication use is associated with headache frequency in children and adolescents. Outcomes of interest include: (1) headache frequency; (2) change in headache frequency, with time and in relationship to use of acute medications; and (3) headache-related disability. We will also review data addressing treatment/management of medication overuse or medication-overuse headache in children and adolescents. Relevant comparators will be withdrawal vs reduction of acute medication, initiation of preventive therapy vs no initiation with or without withdrawal of acute medication, and initiation of preventive therapy early vs late. Outcomes of interest include (1) days of acute medication use; (2) headache frequency; (3) change in headache frequency; and (4) headache-related disability. After screening for inclusion, 2 team members will independently review and extract relevant data, and any discrepancies will be resolved through discussion and arbitration. We will assess risk of bias using appropriate tools (Cochrane Risk of Bias for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and Newcastle-Ottawa Score for observational studies). Data will be summarized descriptively in text and tables. RESULTS This systematic review will provide an overview of the available evidence on medication-overuse headache in children and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this review will aid clinicians by clarifying for them the current state of the evidence base, and will inform design of future research on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jessica Gautreaux
- Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of New Orleans, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Rebecca Burch
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Neurology, Graham Headache Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evans Whitaker
- Library Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jason Roberts
- Headache Journal, Headache Editorial Office, Plymouth, MA, USA
| | - Dana P Turner
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amy A Gelfand
- Child & Adolescent Headache Program, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Arab A, Khoshbin M, Karimi E, Saberian G, Saadatnia M, Khorvash F. Effects of greater occipital nerve block with local anesthetic and triamcinolone for treatment of medication overuse headache: an open-label, parallel, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Neurol Sci 2021; 43:549-557. [PMID: 33945036 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05295-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM There is a paucity of evidence and consensus on exactly how to carry out the detoxification process. To examine the effect of a greater occipital nerve block (GONB) in the detoxification process, we conducted an open-label, parallel, randomized, controlled clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS In order to conduct this study, 54 medication-overuse headache (MOH) patients were recruited and allocated randomly to group A (n = 27) or B (n = 27). In both groups, patients underwent detoxification processes without any acute migraine medication or analgesics. During the run-in period, all patients in both groups received the same education, managed by a neurologist and nutritionist. All patients were offered maximally 300 mL of promethazine syrup (5 mg/5 mL) to be taken 10 mg every 8 h during the first 10 days of the study. A 2-mL syringe containing 1 mL of lidocaine 2% and 1 mL of triamcinolone 40 mg/mL was prepared for each patient of group A for conducting GONB. Characteristics of headache attacks, including headache severity, frequency, and duration, were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of intervention. RESULTS Twenty-six patients in group A (96.3%) and twenty-three in group B (85.2%) completed detoxification, and were thus cured of MOH (P = 0.351). The present study revealed that GONB with local anesthetic and triamcinolone significantly improved the characteristics of headache, including frequency (- 13.66 in group A and - 7.55 in group B), duration (- 7.92 in group A and - 5.88 in group B), and severity (- 3.44 in group A vs. - 1.33 in group B) in group A compared to control (all P value < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Although both detoxification programs were effective, detoxification with GONB resulted in better outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (registration number; IRCT20150906023922N2).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arman Arab
- Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Masoud Khoshbin
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Shah Vali Hospital, Azad University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran
| | - Elham Karimi
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.,Research Development Center, Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ghazal Saberian
- School of Medicine, Azad University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran
| | - Mohammad Saadatnia
- Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Al Zahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Fariborz Khorvash
- Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Al Zahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|