Twenty-five years of triptans - a nationwide population study

Triptans utilization in Italian population: A real-life study in community pharmacies

The term Headache Disorders (HD) refers to a number of nervous system pathologies characterised by recurrent headaches. Despite the serious impact HD have on the health system, society, and the economy, these are an underestimated, underdiagnosed, and, hence, undertreated phenomenon. Triptans are the first-line therapy for the acute treatment of moderate to severe migraine but their utilization is still inadequate, perhaps also because in Italy no triptan can be bought without a medical prescription. In this article, the data from a 2016-2017 study has been further analysed with the aim of evaluating any associations between the use of triptans and the other series of variables identified in the questionnaire. This further analysis has been connected to the role that community pharmacies could play on this issue. The questionnaire was administered to 4,424 pharmacy users by 610 purposely trained pharmacists working in 514 pharmacies. The survey was carried out in 19 of the 20 Italian regions. The data shows that only 25% of patients suffering from HDs are prescribed triptans. Older patients, those with definite migraines, and those with a chronic disorder resort more frequently to this class of pharmaceuticals, as do those patients in care at a specialist headache centre. The multivariable analysis also confirmed these results. Our study, which performed a direct detection, in real life, on patients requesting pharmacological treatment for a migraine headache, therefore confirmed the need to investigate the reasons behind the low use and prescription of triptans in the Italian population. Moreover, any future studies should take advantage of community pharmacies, plan actions that would allow a series of evaluations over time of the requirements of migraineurs, and establish a process to put these patients under the care of the pharmacy to ensure adherence to therapy.

The ATP sensitive potassium channel (KATP) is a novel target for migraine drug development

Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, affecting work and social life. It has been estimated that sales of migraine medicines will reach 12.9 billion USD in 2027. To reduce social impact, migraine treatments must improve, and the ATP-sensitive potassium (K_ATP) channel is a promising target because of the growing evidence of its implications in the pathogenesis of migraine. Strong human data show that opening of the K_ATP channel using levcromakalim is the most potent headache and migraine trigger ever tested as it induces headache in almost all healthy subjects and migraine attacks in 100% of migraine sufferers. This review will address the basics of the K_ATP channel together with clinical and preclinical data on migraine implications. We argue that K_ATP channel blocking, especially the Kir6.1/SUR2B subtype, may be a target for migraine drug development, however translational issues remain. There are no human data on the closure of the K_ATP channel, although blocking the channel is effective in animal models of migraine. We believe there is a good likelihood that an antagonist of the Kir6.1/SUR2B subtype of the K_ATP channel will be effective in the treatment of migraine. The side effects of such a blocker may be an issue for clinical use, but the risk is likely only moderate. Future clinical trials of a selective Kir6.1/SUR2B blocker will answer these questions.

Pharmacological Profiling of KATP Channel Modulators: An Outlook for New Treatment Opportunities for Migraine

Migraine is a highly disabling pain disorder with huge socioeconomic and personal costs. It is genetically heterogenous leading to variability in response to current treatments and frequent lack of response. Thus, new treatment strategies are needed. A combination of preclinical and clinical data indicate that ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel inhibitors could be novel and highly effective drugs in the treatment of migraine. The subtype Kir6.1/SUR2B is of particular interest and inhibitors specific for this cranio-vascular KATP channel subtype may qualify as future migraine drugs. Historically, different technologies and methods have been undertaken to characterize KATP channel modulators and, therefore, a head-to-head comparison of potency and selectivity between the different KATP subtypes is difficult to assess. Here, we characterize available KATP channel activators and inhibitors in fluorescence-based thallium-flux assays using HEK293 cells stably expressing human Kir6.1/SUR2B, Kir6.2/SUR1, and Kir6.2/SUR2A KATP channels. Among the openers tested, levcromakalim, Y-26763, pinacidil, P-1075, ZM226600, ZD0947, and A-278637 showed preference for the KATP channel subtype Kir6.1/SUR2B, whereas BMS-191095, NN414, and VU0071306 demonstrated preferred activation of the Kir6.2/SUR1 subtype. In the group of KATP channel blockers, only Rosiglitazone and PNU-37783A showed selective inhibition of the Kir6.1/SUR2B subtype. PNU-37783A was stopped in clinical development and Rosiglitazone has a low potency for the vascular KATP channel subtype. Therefore, development of novel selective KATP channel blockers, having a benign side effect profile, are needed to clinically prove inhibition of Kir6.1/SUR2B as an effective migraine treatment.

Utilization patterns, cardiovascular risk, and concomitant serotoninergic medications among triptan users between 2008 and 2018: A gender analysis in one Italian region, Tuscany

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pattern of triptan use by gender in Tuscany, Italy, focusing on special user populations in which evidence on triptan safety is still not conclusive.

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence supports the role of gender differences in migraine pathophysiology and treatment. However, gender impact on triptan real-word utilization has been poorly investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive, cohort study was performed using the population-based Administrative Healthcare Database of Tuscany region (Italy). Subjects registered in the database on the January 1 of each year between 2008 and 2018 were identified. New users (NU) of triptans (ATC:N02CC*) were patients with one or more triptan dispensation during the year of interest and none in the past. Age, cardiovascular comorbidities representing an absolute or a possible contraindication to triptan utilization, concomitant serotonergic medications, and pattern of triptan use during 1-year follow-up were described by gender.

RESULTS

A total of 86,109 patients who received one or more triptan dispensing were identified. Of 64,672 NU (men = 17,039; women = 47,633), 10.2% (6823/64,672) were aged >65 years, who were mostly women (n = 4613). Among NU, men and women with absolute cardiovascular contraindications were 4.3% (740/17,039) and 2.1% (1022/47,633), respectively, while those concomitantly taking serotonergic medications were 17.2% (267/1549) and 21.9% (949/4330), respectively (949/4330). Regular users (two or more dispensing with ≥3 months between first and last observed dispensing) accounted for 26.4% of women (12,597/47,633) and 19.11% of men (3250/17,039); frequent users (≥15 dosage units/month during ≥3 consecutive months) were overall 0.1% (94/64,672) and 62.0% (58/94) of them concomitantly received serotonergic medications.

CONCLUSION

Considering gender differences in triptan use highlighted here, large scale observational studies are warranted to better define what populations are safe to use triptans and whether it is appropriate to tighten or relax certain recommendations on triptan use. In the meantime, any suspected adverse drug reaction observed in the special user populations highlighted in this study should be promptly reported.

Childhood cancer confers increased risk of migraine - A Danish nationwide register study

BACKGROUND

Investigations of migraine among childhood cancer survivors have predominantly relied on self-reported information and hospital discharge diagnoses. Alone, both approaches are liable to bias. We used Danish nationwide registers to obtain data on both prescriptions of acute migraine medications (antimigraines) and hospital discharge diagnoses of migraine to assess the relative risk of migraine across a wider spectrum of migraine presentations than previously studied.

METHODS

We followed a Danish population-based cohort of 7771 individuals with childhood cancer diagnosed in the period from Jan 1st, 1978 to Dec 31st, 2017, for risk of prescription antimigraine initiation and for risk of hospitalization due to migraine. Rates of hospitalization were assessed for the entire follow-up period whereas rates of antimigraine initiations were assessed in the period from Jan 1st, 1997, to Dec 31st, 2017. Relative to the general population without childhood cancer, standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for each outcome.

RESULTS

Individuals exposed to childhood cancer were at increased risk of antimigraine initiation (SIR of 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11-1.38) and of migraine hospitalization (SIR of 2.44, 95% CI: 1.87-3.12) from the day of their cancer diagnosis and up to 40 years after.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals diagnosed with childhood cancer have a higher risk of migraine of varying presentations, in addition to migraine resulting in hospitalization as previously reported. This potentially preventable problem warrants clinical attention.

Treatment experiences and clinical characteristics in migraine and tension-type headache patients before the first visit to a tertiary headache center

OBJECTIVES

To investigate previous treatment and clinical characteristics in migraine and tension-type headache patients at their first visit to a tertiary headache center.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using data obtained from electronic questionnaires and medical charts. Migraine and tension-type headache patients were investigated at their first visit to the Danish Headache Center.

RESULTS

Out of 382 patients the main diagnoses of primary headaches were: 36% with episodic migraine, 43% with chronic migraine, 3% with episodic tension-type headache and 17% with chronic tension-type headache. The majority had attempted non-pharmacological treatment options such as physiotherapy (episodic migraine: 53%, chronic migraine: 68%, episodic tension-type headache: 50%, chronic tension-type headache: 65%) and acupuncture: (episodic migraine: 45%, chronic migraine: 62%, episodic tension-type headache: 17%, chronic tension-type headache: 51%). The majority of migraine patients had tried no more than one triptan (episodic migraine: 71%, chronic migraine: 66%). In total, 35% of episodic migraine and 19% of chronic migraine patients as well as 50% of episodic tension-type headache and 41% of chronic tension-type headache patients had never tried preventive medication. The headache under-response to treatment (HURT) questionnaire score was higher in chronic migraine (score 15) and chronic tension-type headache (score 16) patients than the episodic forms (P < 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Headache patients had attempted several non-pharmacological treatments prior to their first visit at a tertiary headache center in Denmark. The limited use of acute and preventive treatment before the first visit demonstrates a need for better treatment at the primary and secondary care level.

Low adherence to the guideline for the acute treatment of migraine

The real-world use of triptans in the treatment of migraine is disappointing. Only 12% of the Danish migraine population purchased a triptan between 2014 and 2019, and only 43% repurchased a triptan after first prescription. The aim of the present study was to assess whether physicians and patients adhere to the therapeutic guideline on acute migraine treatment. We interviewed 299 triptan experienced participants with migraine and 101 triptan naïve participants with migraine from the Danish Migraine Population Cohort, using a semi-structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistical analyses were used to study the association with triptan use and the assessed factors. Among triptan naïve participants with migraine, 64% had consulted their general practitioner about their migraine, of whom only 23% received information about the possibility of triptan treatment. Among triptan experienced participants, 77% had only tried one type of triptan. Only 12% could recall they had been informed by their general practitioner to try each triptan three times before giving up. Twenty percent were informed to try three different triptans in total, if the first did not work. In disagreement with the guideline, participants who reported a low pain reduction by a triptan had only tried one type of triptan. Our study shows a low adherence to therapeutic guideline for the attack treatment of migraine. There is a need for better education of general practitioners regarding treatment of migraine. Future campaigns should aim to inform both the public and the general practitioner about antimigraine treatments.