Posterolateral corner reconstruction using the single fibular sling method for posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee

Outcomes after multiligament knee injury worsen over time: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are devastating injuries that can have life-long consequences. A management plan requires the decision to perform surgery or not, timing of surgery, consideration of repair versus reconstruction, reconstruction technique and reconstruction graft choice. The purpose of this study was to analyze development of clinical outcomes of MLKIs over time at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Four databases were queried for surgical outcome-based studies of MLKIs published from 01/2000 through 09/2022 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Technique articles, nonoperative treatment, arthroplasty, pediatric and review articles were excluded. Study characteristics including design, number of patients, age, follow-up period, anatomical region and posterior-cruciate ligament (PCL)-based injury were collected. Primary outcomes were Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) outcome scores and Tegner activity score. Random-effects model analysis was performed.

RESULTS

After the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 3571 patients in 79 studies were included in the analysis. The mean age at surgery was 35.6 years. The mean follow-up was 4.06 years (range 2-12.7). The mean Lysholm score at 2-year follow-up was 86.09 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.90-89.28], with a yearly decrease of -0.80 [95% CI: -1.47 -0.13], (p = 0.0199). The mean IKDC at 2 years was 81.35 [95% CI: 76.56-86.14], with a yearly decrease of -1.99 [95% CI: -3.14 -0.84] (p < 0.001). Non-PCL-based injuries had a higher IKDC 83.69 [75.55-91.82] vs. 75.00 [70.75-79.26] (p = 0.03) and Lysholm score 90.84 [87.10-94.58] versus 84.35 [82.18-86.52] (p < 0.01) than PCL-based injuries, respectively.

CONCLUSION

According to the present systematic review and meta-analysis of MLKIs with minimum 2-year follow-ups, the patients who suffered an MLKI can expect to retain around 80-85% of knee function at 2 years and can expect a yearly deterioration of knee function, depending on the score used. Inferior outcomes can be expected for PCL-based injuries at 2 years postoperative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV meta-analysis.

Autograft Versus Allograft in Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Several approaches to surgical techniques and graft types exist in posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction. The literature lacks knowledge regarding outcomes after autograft versus allograft reconstruction for PLC injuries.

Purpose

To comprehensively review the current literature on PLC reconstruction and compare outcomes between autograft and allograft tissues.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

The PubMed and Scopus online databases were searched with the terms "PLC,""posterolateral knee,""posterolateral corner," and "reconstruction" in varying combinations. Patient characteristics, graft type, graft failure, surgical techniques, functional outcome scores, and varus laxity on stress radiographs were reviewed and compared between PLC reconstruction with autografts versus allografts.

Results

Included were 22 studies comprising 33 cohorts: 16 autografts (n = 280 knees) and 17 allografts (336 knees). There were 69 isolated PLC reconstructions (58 allografts and 11 autografts) and 493 multiligament reconstructions (269 autografts and 224 allografts). There was no difference in the mean patient age (30.5 vs 33.5 years, respectively; P = .11) or mean follow-up (39.5 vs 37.7 months, respectively; P = .68) between the autograft and allograft groups. There was no evidence to suggest a difference in graft failures between graft types (pooled mean autograft vs allograft: 0.44 vs 0.41 failures; P = .95). There was a significant difference in the mean postoperative Lysholm scores for autografts versus allografts (89.6 vs 85.5, respectively; P = .04). There was no difference between the cohorts in preoperative or postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores or postoperative varus laxity.

Conclusion

Our review and meta-analysis indicated no significant differences in graft failure rates or objective outcomes after PLC reconstruction based on graft type alone. There was a significant difference in postoperative Lysholm scores in favor of the autograft group and no significant difference in IKDC subjective scores.

There Is No Difference in Clinical Outcomes of Tibial-Based Versus Fibular-Based Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To evaluate and analyze the current literature regarding clinical outcomes after posterolateral corner reconstruction (PLCR) using fibular-based and tibial-based techniques.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes after PLCR. Embase, PubMed, and Scopus were searched from their respective inception through October 25, 2022. Studies containing patient-reported outcome scores of tibial and fibular-based PLCR were included. Outcomes collected from each study were summarized using t tests for consistently reported Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee Score.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies (16 with level of evidence IV, 6 with Level III, and 2 with Level II) met the inclusion criteria and included 669 patients in total. Four studies comprising 111 patients directly compared the results of tibial- and fibular-based PLCR. Mean clinical follow-up across all studies was 3.3 years. The 4 studies that reported on both tibial and fibular-based PLCR were found to have no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes with P values ranging from .0561 to .9881.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of the available literature regarding tibial- and fibular-based posterolateral corner reconstruction suggests no clinical differences.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-IV, review of systematic studies.

Comparison of Arthroscopic versus Open Placement of the Fibular Tunnel in Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

 Precise fibular tunnel placement in posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction is crucial in restoring rotational and lateral stability. Despite the recent progress of arthroscopic PLC reconstruction techniques, landmarks for arthroscopic fibular tunnel placement and a comparison to open tunnel placement have not yet been described. This study aimed to (1) identify reasonable soft-tissue and bony landmarks, which can be identified by either arthroscopy, fluoroscopy, or open surgery in anatomic fibular tunnel placement and (2) to compare accuracy and reliability of arthroscopic fibular tunnel placement with open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 In a retrospective study, 41 magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the knee were analyzed with emphasis on distances of an ideal anatomic fibular tunnel to 11 soft-tissue and bony landmarks. Subsequently, in eight cadaver knees, the ideal fibular tunnel was created arthroscopically and with a standard open technique from antero-latero-inferior to postero-medio-superior with a 2-mm K-wire. Positions of both tunnels were compared on postinterventional computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

 Based on MRI measurements, the anatomic tunnel entry should be 14.50 (±2.18) mm distal to the tip of the fibular styloid and 10.76 (±1.37) mm posterior to the anterior edge of the fibula. The anatomic fibular tunnel exit was located 12.89 (±2.35) mm below the tip of the fibular head. Arthroscopic fibular tunnel placement was reliable in all cases. Instead, in five out of the eight cases with open surgery, the fibular tunnel crossed the defined safety distance to the closest cortical edge/tibiofibular joint (distance < 8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

 Reliable soft-tissue and bony landmarks of the fibular head allow arthroscopic anatomic fibular tunnel placement in PLC surgery, which shows a lower risk of tunnel malposition compared with open surgical techniques. Future studies will have to show whether clinical results of arthroscopic PLC reconstruction are in line with this study's technical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

 Level III.

Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction of the Knee Using Gracilis Autograft and Biceps Femoris

We introduce our technique for posterolateral corner reconstruction, which is based on the principle described in Arciero's technique for anatomic reconstruction of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) to gain static stability in varus strain and external rotation. This technique uses a doubled gracilis autograft to reconstruct the PFL and a split biceps tendon transfer to reconstruct the LCL. Using this technique an anatomical LCL and PFL reconstruction can be performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament or posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction without contralateral graft harvest or allograft. The technique also enables an isolated reconstruction of LCL or PFL when required and can be performed to augment an acute repair.

Comparable Subjective and Objective Clinical Outcomes After Fibular or Combined Tibial-Fibular-based Reconstruction of the Posterolateral Corner of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To compare subjective and objective outcomes of fibular and combined tibial-fibular (TF)-based posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature reporting outcomes of posterolateral corner reconstruction was conducted including outcome studies of surgically treated PLC injuries with a minimum 1-year follow-up, postoperative subjective and objective outcomes including the patient-reported outcome scorings of Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation (subjective and objective), dial test, and varus stress radiographs.

RESULTS

The 32 studies included comprised 40 cohorts: 12 cohorts (n = 350 knees) used a fibular-based technique, and 28 cohorts (n = 593 knees) used a combined TF-based technique. No statistically significant differences were found in patient-reported outcomes or objective clinical measurements comparing the two techniques using the Lysholm score (P = 0.204, τ2 = 3.46), International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation (subjective P = 0.21 τ2 = 15.57; objective P = 0.398), dial test (P = 0.69), or varus stress radiographs (P = 0.98, τ2 = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no statistically significant differences in subjective or objective clinical outcome measurements after fibular-based versus combined TF-based PLC reconstruction. Further prospective evaluation comparing long-term clinical outcomes, complications, and surgical time may help to elucidate a preferred reconstructive technique.

Incidence of Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications After Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction or Repair: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

BACKGROUND

Posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee are being increasingly recognized and treated in current orthopaedic practice. While there are numerous systematic reviews evaluating the management and outcomes after PLC injuries, there are limited data investigating complications after PLC reconstruction or repair.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature to determine the incidence of postoperative complications after the surgical treatment of PLC injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (2008-2019), Embase (2008-2019), and MEDLINE (2008-2019) were queried for literature reporting on PLC reconstruction or repair, with or without concomitant ligamentous or meniscal surgery. Data including type of surgery performed, concomitant procedures, and follow-up time were extracted. Complications recorded included intra- and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

After the intra- and postoperative complication data of 60 studies (1747 cases) were combined, surgical management of PLC injuries was associated with an intraoperative complication rate of 0.34% (range, 0%-2.8%) and a postoperative complication rate of 20% (range, 0%-51.2%). The most common postoperative complication was arthrofibrosis (range, 0%-20%). The overall infection rate was 1.3% (range, 0%-10%). Four cases of postoperative common peroneal nerve palsy were reported. Failure of reconstruction or repair was reported in 164 (9.4%) of all cases examined (range, 0%-37.1%).

CONCLUSION

Although the intraoperative rate of complications during PLC reconstructions is low, postoperative complications rates of 20% can be expected, including arthrofibrosis, infection, and neurovascular injury. PLC structures repaired or reconstructed failed in 9.4% of the cases.

Can Anatomic Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Using a Fibular Tunnel Restore Fibular Footprints of the Posterolateral Complex? A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to (1) quantitatively analyze the fibular footprints of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) and (2) evaluate whether a fibular tunnel can restore the LCL and PFL fibular footprints simultaneously without modification in anatomic posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee.

METHODS

In 20 cadaveric knees, anatomic characteristics, such as diameter, location and relationship with anatomic landmarks, of the LCL and PFL footprints were analyzed. Subsequently, a fibular tunnel that connected the LCL and PFL footprint centers was created with 1.5 mm drill bit, and tunnel depth, which is defined as the distance between the tunnel and the nearest cortex, was evaluated. An additional tunnel from the anteroinferior border of the LCL footprint to the posteroinferior border of the PFL footprint was created, and its tunnel depth was evaluated as well and compared with that of the original tunnel.

RESULTS

The LCL footprint was longitudinally ovoid (8.4 ± 1.0 × 13 ± 1.0 mm), and its inferior margin corresponded well with the lateral apex of the fibula (distance, 1.0 ± 0.7 mm). The PFL footprint was round (9.7 ± 1.3 × 9.0 ± 1.1 mm), and its center was very close to the tip of the fibular styloid process (1.2 ± 0.8 mm). The tunnel depth of the original fibular tunnel was 1.8 ± 0.7 mm, and it was very shallow for tunnel reaming. On the contrary, the tunnel depth of the modified fibular tunnel (6.4 ± 1.1 mm) was significantly higher than that of the original tunnel (P < 0.05), and it was relatively safe for tunnel reaming.

CONCLUSIONS

A single fibular tunnel cannot reproduce the LCL and PFL footprint centers simultaneously because the trajectory is too close to the cortex. A modified fibular tunnel, using the margins of the footprints, is recommended to avoid cortical blowout.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A modified fibular tunnel that covers only portions of the LCL and PFL footprints, from the anteroinferior LCL footprint to the posteroinferior PFL footprint, is less likely to blow out the lateral fibula than is a similar tunnel using the anatomic footprint centers.

Anatomic, All-Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Posterolateral Corner of the Knee: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

To assess the role of anatomic reconstruction of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee arthroscopically in cadaveric knees with simulated isolated grade III posterolateral instability.

METHODS

A total of 12 nonpaired, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were biomechanically subjected to a 10-Nm varus moment, 5-Nm external and internal rotation torques, and 134-N posterior tibial load at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion (0° for varus loading only). Testing was performed with an intact and sectioned PLC and after anatomic reconstruction of the PLC by an arthroscopic technique. Kinematics of each knee under various loading conditions was determined with a robotic universal force/moment sensor testing system.

RESULTS

After sectioning, significant increases were found in varus rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion; in external rotation at 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion; in internal rotation at 60° of knee flexion only; and in posterior translation at 15° and 30° of knee flexion. After reconstruction, full recovery of knee stability was observed in varus rotation, external rotation, internal rotation, and posterior translation at all selected flexion angles without any overconstraint of knee kinematics.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic reconstruction of the PLC can be performed arthroscopically with isolated grade III posterolateral instability of the knee, and nearly normal stability of the knee can be restored.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

PLC reconstruction by an anatomic, all-arthroscopic technique achieves optimal stability control and kinematics of the knee.

Posterolateral corner reconstruction in combined injuries of the knee: Improved stability with Larson's fibular sling reconstruction and comparison with LaPrade anatomical reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The goal of this prospective cohort study was to present the clinical results of a two-year follow-up of a Larson's posterolateral corner reconstruction (fibular sling) in patients with symptomatic instability of the knee. These data were compared with data of an anatomical reconstruction of the posterolateral corner as described by LaPrade et al. (combined tibial tunnel and fibular sling) [1].

METHODS

Eleven patients underwent a Larson's posterolateral corner reconstruction. Cruciate ligament ruptures were reconstructed if present. Multiple subjective knee outcome scores (VAS satisfaction score, Tegner, Lysholm, Noyes score, and IKDC subjective knee score) were obtained pre-operatively and two years after surgery. Laxity of the joint was measured using bilateral varus stress radiographs.

RESULTS

All patients had concomitant ACL or PCL surgery. VAS satisfaction, the Tegner, Noyes and the IKDC subjective knee score all improved significantly. Median varus laxity of the injured knee on varus stress radiographs improved significantly from 6.2° (3.1-10.1) to 3.9° (1.1-5.7), p = .0076. Post-operative varus laxity did not return to the level of the uninjured knee: 2.7° (1-5.7), p = .028. In comparison with our data on the reconstruction technique according to LaPrade, no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome were observed.

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of the posterolateral corner in combined injuries of the knee using a Larson fibular sling technique results in improved varus stability but not to the level of the uninjured knee. Functional knee scores improved significantly. We found no differences in functional and radiological outcome between the Larson's fibular sling reconstruction and LaPrade anatomical reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Satisfactory knee function after single-stage posterolateral corner reconstruction in the multi-ligament injured/dislocated knee using the anatomic single-graft technique

PURPOSE

Increasing importance has been placed on the posterolateral corner (PLC) in maintaining varus and rotational stability of the knee. The goal of this study was to evaluate knee function and clinical stability following a single-graft PLC reconstruction technique and identify factors associated with poor knee function.

METHODS

This study identified patients with a multi-ligament knee injury between 2006 and 2013. Patients who received a single-graft fibular collateral ligament and PLC reconstruction with a single-stage surgery during the study period and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years after surgery were included. Functional outcomes were assessed using Lysholm and IKDC scores. Varus and rotational knee laxity and range of motion were assessed using physical examination.

RESULTS

The final study cohort included 61 patients who underwent PLC reconstruction using a single-graft technique. The mean IKDC score was 74.1 (± 22.3) and the mean Lysholm score was 80.3 (± 21.8) at mean follow-up of 3.8 years (range 2-9 years). Mean range of motion at final follow-up measured from 0° to 126° [range flexion: 95-145, range extension: 0-5]. Fifty-eight patients (95%) had grade 0 varus laxity in full knee extension, and 54 patients (88.5%) had grade 0 varus laxity at 30° of knee flexion. Female gender was associated with a lower postoperative IKDC score (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of the PLC using a single-graft technique can result in satisfactory knee function and stable physical examination findings at minimum 2 years after surgery. Female gender was predictive of poor knee function after PLC reconstruction. Surgical treatment of PLC injuries should be individualized based on the timing of surgery, specific injured knee structures, and physical examination findings. This study helps validate the use of a single-graft technique for PLC reconstruction and can be used to help counsel patients about expected knee function after surgical treatment of PLC injuries. Level of evidence IV.

Clinical outcomes after multiligament injured knees: medial versus lateral reconstructions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical outcomes of multiligament injured knees with respect to the medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner (PMC) repair or reconstruction versus the posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction in patients operated according to a codified surgical protocol.

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether PMC or PLC was injured. Cruciate ligaments as well as PMC or PLC were reconstructed/repaired in a one-stage procedure. At minimum of 1-year follow-up, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) forms, Lysholm score and sports activity level were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with a median follow-up time of 57 months (range 12-129) were reviewed. No significant difference was found for functional scores between acute PMC and PLC subgroups. In Group PLC, subjective outcomes tend to be better in the acute than in chronic reconstruction subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

A one-stage protocol with early surgery rather than delayed reconstruction produced better clinical outcomes whatever the injured collateral ligament, medial or lateral. In the future, early and chronic reconstructions as well as each injury pattern should be considered as separate entities in studies on multiple ligament injured knees to reach a better level of evidence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Anatomic Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Using a Fibula Cross-Tunnel Technique: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical properties of a fibula cross-tunnel technique for posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction with those of intact knees.

METHODS

Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested while intact, after PLC tear, and after reconstruction. Testing of the parameters listed above was performed at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. Reconstruction was performed using 2 independent tendon autografts. Afterward, the fibula and graft were loaded to failure.

RESULTS

Reconstruction restored external rotation (0°: 11.75° ± 2.02° to 9.81° ± 1.81°, P = .57; 30°: 17.91° ± 1.32° to 13.96° ± 2.84°, P = .12; 60°: 15.86° ± 1.68° to 13.26° ± 3.58°, P = .41; 90°: 15.53° ± 1.62° to 14.07° ± 2.95°, P = .54) to the intact state, and posterior translation (0°: 3.66 ± 0.85 mm to 3.31 ± 0.89 mm, P = .87; 60°: 3.15 ± 0.45 mm to 2.96 ± 0.45 mm, P = .73; 90°: 2.74 ± 0.33 mm to 3.05 ± 0.41 mm, P = .41) and varus angulation (0°: 0.92° ± 0.35° to 1.98° ± 0.42°, P = .55; 30°: 2.65° ± 0.27° to 1.09° ± 0.90°, P = .37; 90°: 4.29° ± 0.44° to 2.53° ± 1.13°, P = .19) under most conditions. During load to failure testing, the construct revealed properties similar to those of native structures (yield load: 330.4 ± 45.8 N; ultimate load: 420.9 ± 37.4 N).

CONCLUSIONS

This technique restored external rotation to the intact state after PLC injury in all testing conditions, as well as posterior translation at 0°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, and varus angulation under all conditions tested except 60° of flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clinically, this surgical technique may eliminate the need for a tibial tunnel for posterolateral corner reconstruction.

Outcomes for surgical treatment of posterolateral instability of the knee

Injuries to the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee can be associated with a variety of additional ligamentous and soft-tissue injuries. The clinical outcome of a PLC injury is dependent on associated injuries, the chronicity of injury, and the method of reconstruction. This chapter discusses the current literature regarding outcomes of surgical treatment of acute and chronic injuries. The majority of the current literature includes level IV case series evidence. Anatomic reconstruction of the PLC with concomitant treatment of associated knee ligament injuries in acute and chronic cases is the preferred treatment. There are mixed outcomes with acute repair of injured tissues as well as advancement procedures. The surgical treatment must be tailored to the specific needs of the patient and the ligament injury pattern.

Surgical management of combined anterior or posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner tears: for what functional results?

INTRODUCTION

Management of combined anterior or posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner tears is still poorly codified. The aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcome after complete surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 53 patients. Mean age was 29.8 yrs. (15-49). The anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments were involved in respectively 48 and 5 cases. Mean time to surgery was 25.6 months (0-184), and in 10 cases less than 21 days. Nine patients were sedentary workers and 29 non-sedentary (13 laborers). All ligament injuries were treated surgically. Mean follow-up was 49 months (12-146). Last follow-up assessment used IKDC, Lysholm and KOOS scores.

RESULTS

At last follow-up, IKDC score graded 14 patients A, 25 B, 8 C and 6 D, versus 0 A, 4 B, 25 C, 22 D and 2 ungraded preoperatively. Mean subjective IKDC and Lysholm scores were respectively 72.8 (11.5-100) and 77.5 (37-100). Mean KOOS scores (pain, symptoms, daily life, sports, quality of life) were respectively 78 (3-100), 70 (25-100), 88 (47-100), 53 (0-100) and 50 (0-100). Posterolateral laxity was corrected in all but two cases. All sedentary workers and 86.7% of non-sedentary workers could return to work. The job had to be changed in 10% of cases overall, but in 25% of cases for laborers.

DISCUSSION

The present results are comparable with those of the literature. The strategy of combined surgical treatment showed functional efficacy, usually associated with return to work except for some laborers. There was a non-significant trend in favor of acute-phase ligament reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective series).

Medial injury in knee dislocations: what are the common injury patterns and surgical outcomes?

BACKGROUND

When associated with a knee dislocation, management of the medial ligamentous injury is challenging, with little literature available to guide treatment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We (1) compared MRI findings of medial ligament injuries between Schenck KDIIIM and KDIV injuries, (2) compared clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life as determined by Lysholm and Veterans Rand 36-Item Health Survey (VR-36) scores, respectively, of reconstructed KDIIIM and KDIV injured knees, and (3) determined reoperation rates of reconstructed KDIIIM and KDIV injured knees.

METHODS

Over a 12-year period, we treated 65 patients with knee dislocations involving bicruciate ligament injury and concomitant medial ligament injuries, without or with posterolateral corner injuries (Schenck KDIIIM and KDIV, respectively); 57% were available for followup at a mean of 6.2 years (range, 1.1-11.6 years). These patients were contacted, and prospectively measured clinical outcomes scores (Lysholm and VR-36) were obtained and compared between subsets of patients. Preoperative MRIs (available for review on 49% of the patients) were rereviewed to characterize the medial ligament injuries.

RESULTS

KDIIIM injuries more frequently had complete deep medial collateral ligament tears and posterior oblique ligament tears compared to KDIV injuries. KDIIIM knees had better Lysholm scores (88 versus 67, p = 0.027) and VR-36 scores (88 versus 70, p = 0.022) than KDIV knees. Female sex (Lysholm: 55 versus 85, p = 0.005; VR-36: 59 versus 85, p = 0.003) and an ultra-low-velocity mechanism (injury that occurs during activity of daily living in obese patients) (Lysholm: 55 versus 80-89, p = 0.002-0.013; VR-36: 60 versus 79-88, p = 0.001-0.017) were associated with worse outcomes. The overall reoperation rate was 28%, and the most common indication for reoperation was stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

Medial ligament injury is common in knee dislocations. Females who sustain these injuries and patients who have an ultra-low-velocity mechanism should be counseled at the time of injury about the likelihood of inferior outcomes. As ROM deficits are the most commonly encountered complication, postoperative rehabilitation should focus on early ROM exercises as stability and wound healing allow. Future prospective studies are needed to definitively determine whether operative or nonoperative management is appropriate for particular medial ligamentous injury patterns.

Clinical, Functional, and Morphological Evaluations of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Numerous posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction techniques have evolved and have revealed satisfactory outcomes; however, the optimal operative method for PCL reconstruction remains controversial.

HYPOTHESIS

Transtibial PCL reconstruction with a remnant preservation technique would result in successful clinical, radiological, functional, and morphological outcomes. In addition, it was hypothesized that the results of combined PCL and posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction would be comparable with those of isolated PCL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 168 patients who underwent arthroscopic PCL reconstruction with or without reconstruction of the PLC between March 2006 and June 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Ninety-two patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, and 47 of 92 patients who underwent combined PCL and PLC reconstruction were evaluated as a subgroup. The PLC was reconstructed using the single fibular sling method. The patients were assessed by means of the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score, and Tegner activity score. Stability was evaluated using a KT-2000 arthrometer and Telos device. Proprioception was assessed using the Biodex System. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 34 patients, and second-look arthroscopic surgery was conducted in 36 patients.

RESULTS

The minimum follow-up duration was 24 months in all patients. Clinical outcomes and posterior instability improved significantly. The mean Lysholm score improved from 56.7 ± 7.1 to 89.3 ± 7.3, the mean IKDC subjective knee score improved from 53.3 ± 9.6 to 86.2 ± 6.1, and the mean Tegner activity score was 2.5 ± 0.8 preoperatively and 5.1 ± 1.3 postoperatively (all P < .001). The mean side-to-side difference on posterior stress radiography with the Telos device improved significantly, decreasing from 12.1 ± 2.5 mm to 2.7 ± 1.3 mm (P < .001). The mean side-to-side difference on varus stress radiography was reduced from 5.9 ± 0.8 mm preoperatively to 1.3 ± 1.0 mm after combined PCL and PLC reconstruction (P < .001). Postoperative proprioception recovered to a level similar to that of the uninvolved side, and MRI and second-look arthroscopic surgery showed a high rate of complete healing and synovialization in patients who underwent either isolated PCL reconstruction or combined PLC and PCL reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Transtibial PCL reconstruction with remnant preservation resulted in satisfactory clinical, functional, radiological, and morphological outcomes. The results of combined posterolateral rotatory instability were comparable with those for isolated PCL reconstruction with adequate PLC reconstruction.