Patellofemoral Joint Loads During Running at the Time of Return to Sport in Elite Athletes With ACL Reconstruction

Incline and decline running alters joint moment contributions but not peak support moments in individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controls

Individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) commonly exhibit altered gait patterns, potentially contributing to an increased risk of osteoarthritis (OA). Joint moment contributions (JMCs) and support moments during incline and decline running are unknown in healthy young adults and individuals with an ACLR. Understanding these conditional joint-level changes could explain the increased incidence of OA that develops in the long term. Therefore, this knowledge may provide insight into the rehabilitation and prevention of OA development. We aimed to identify the interlimb and between-group differences in peak support moments and subsequent peak ankle, knee, and hip JMCs between individuals with an ACLR and matched controls during different sloped running conditions. A total of 17 individuals with unilateral ACLR and 17 healthy individuals who were matched based on sex, height, and mass participated in this study. The participants ran on an instrumented treadmill at an incline of 4°, decline of 4°, incline of 10°, and decline of 10°. The last 10 strides of each condition were used to compare the whole-stance phase support moments and JMCs between limbs, ACLR, and control groups and across conditions. No differences in JMCs were identified between limbs or between the ACLR and healthy control groups across all conditions. Support moments did not change among the different sloped conditions, but JMCs significantly changed. Specifically, ankle and knee JMCs decreased and increased by 30% and 33% from an incline of 10° to a decline of 10° running. Here, the lower extremities can redistribute mechanics across the ankle, knee, and hip while maintaining consistent support moments during incline and decline running. Our data provide evidence that those with an ACLR do not exhibit significant alterations in joint contributions while running on sloped conditions compared to the matched controls. Our findings inform future research interested in understanding the relationship between sloped running mechanics and the incidence of deleterious acute or chronic problems in people with an ACLR.

Pain Early After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction is Associated With 6-Month Loading Mechanics During Running

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) results in persistent altered knee biomechanics, but contributing factors such as pain or patient function, leading to the altered loading, are unknown.

HYPOTHESIS

Individuals with worse self-reported pain after ACLR would have poorer biomechanics during running, and poor loading mechanics would be present in the ACLR limb compared with contralateral and control limbs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort pilot study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

A total of 20 patients after ACLR (age, 18.4 ± 2.7 years; height, 1.7 ± 0.1 m; mass, 84.2 ± 19.4 kg) completed visual analog scale and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) at 1 and 6 months postsurgery. At 6 months postsurgery, patients underwent biomechanical testing during running. A total of 20 control individuals also completed running biomechanical analyses. Associations between patient outcomes and biomechanics were conducted, and differences in running biomechanics between groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

KOOS pain score 1 month after surgery was associated with peak ACLR knee abduction moment (R2 = 0.35;P = 0.01). At 6-months, KOOS sport score was related to peak abduction moment in the ACLR limb (R2 = 0.23; P = 0.05). For change scores, the improvement in pain scores related to ACLR limb peak knee abduction moment (R2 = 0.55; P = 0.001). The ACLR limb had lower knee excursion, extension moments, and ground-reaction forces compared with the uninvolved and control limb. The uninvolved limb also had higher ground-reaction forces compared with the ACLR limb and control limb.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that patient-reported outcomes 1 and 6 months after surgery are associated with running mechanics 6 months after ACLR. Further, the underloading present in the ACLR limb and overloading in the uninvolved limb indicates greater need for running rehabilitation after ACLR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding pain and how it may be linked to movement dysfunction is important for improving long-term outcomes.

Persistent underloading of patellofemoral joint following hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction is associated with cartilage health

OBJECTIVE

To determine the longitudinal changes of patellofemoral joint (PFJ) contact pressure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). To identify the associations between PFJ contact pressure and cartilage health.

DESIGN

Forty-nine subjects with hamstring autograft ACLR (27 males; age 28.8 [standard deviation, 8.3] years) and 19 controls (12 males; 30.7 [4.6] years) participated. A sagittal plane musculoskeletal model was used to estimate PFJ contact pressure. A combined T1ρ/T2 magnetic resonance sequence was obtained. Assessments were performed preoperatively, at 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively in ACLR subjects and once for controls. Repeated Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare peak PFJ contact pressure between ACLR and contralateral knees, and t-tests to compare with control knees. Statistical parametric mapping was used to evaluate the associations between PFJ contact pressure and cartilage relaxation concurrently and longitudinally.

RESULTS

No changes in peak PFJ contact pressure were found within ACLR knees over 3 years (preoperative to 3 years, 0.36 [CI, -0.08, 0.81] MPa), but decreased over time in the contralateral knees (0.75 [0.32, 1.18] MPa). When compared to the controls, ACLR knees exhibited lower PFJ contact pressure at all time points (at baseline, -0.64 [-1.25, -0.03] MPa). Within ACLR knees, lower PFJ contact pressure at 6 months was associated with elevated T2 times (r = -0.47 to -0.49, p = 0.021-0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Underloading of the PFJ following ACLR persists for up to 3 years and has concurrent and future consequences in cartilage health. The non-surgical knees exhibited normal contact pressure initially but decreased over time achieving limb symmetry.

Lower Patellofemoral Joint Contact Force During Side-Step Cutting After Return-to-Sports Clearance Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Low patellofemoral joint (PFJ) contact force has been associated with PFJ osteoarthritis. Quadriceps force and knee flexion angles, which are typically altered after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), primarily influence PFJ contact forces. It is still inconclusive whether differences in PFJ contact forces are present during high knee flexion tasks such as side-step cutting after clearance to return to sports (RTS) after ACLR.

PURPOSE

To explore PFJ contact forces in the ACLR limb and compare them with those of the contralateral and control limbs during side-step cutting tasks after clearance to RTS.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 26 male athletes with ACLR who were previously cleared to RTS were matched with 23 healthy men serving as the control group. Three-dimensional motion capture and force plate data were collected while both groups performed anticipated side-step cutting tasks. Joint kinematics, kinetics, muscle forces, and PFJ contact forces were calculated using musculoskeletal modeling.

RESULTS

Peak PFJ force was lower in the ACLR limbs compared with the contralateral limbs (mean difference [MD], 5.89 body weight [BW]; 95% CI, 4.7-7.1 BW; P < .001) and the control limbs (MD, 4.44 BW; 95% CI, 2.1-6.8 BW; P < .001). During peak PFJ force, knee flexion angle was lower in ACLR limbs compared with the contralateral (MD, 4.88°; 95% CI, 3.0°-6.7°; P < .001) and control (MD, 6.01°; 95% CI, 2.0°-10.0°; P < .002) limbs. A lower quadriceps force compared with the contralateral (MD, 4.14 BW; 95% CI, 3.4-4.9 BW; P < .001) and control (MD, 2.83 BW; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3 BW; P < .001) limbs was also found.

CONCLUSION

Lower PFJ contact forces and a combination of quadriceps force deficits and smaller knee flexion angle were found in the ACLR compared with the contralateral and control limbs even after clearance to RTS.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Despite rehabilitation and subsequent clearance to RTS, differences in PFJ contact forces are present after ACLR. Current rehabilitation and RTS battery may not be effective and sensitive enough to identify and address these differences.

Knee joint underloading does not evolve after a two-week reintroduction to running program after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

Knee underloading patterns have been reported mid- and long-term after return to running post-ACLR, but changes in these patterns during the reintroduction to running are unknown. We evaluated knee biomechanics in individuals within 6 months of ACL-R at the start and completion of a reintroduction to running program.

DESIGN

Longitudinal laboratory study.

SETTING

Three-dimensional running biomechanics during instrumented treadmill running.

PARTICIPANTS

24 participants post-ACL-R with hamstring autograft and 24 healthy, matched controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) and patellofemoral joint (PFJ) contact forces, peak knee extension moment and peak knee flexion angle.

RESULTS

Significant LIMB∗GROUP interactions (all p < 0.05) but no TIME effects were found. PFJ and TFJ contact forces, peak knee flexion angle and peak knee extensor moment were lower (all p < 0.001) on the injured-limb compared to both contralateral-limb and CONTROL. PFJ and TFJ contact forces and peak knee flexion, knee extension moment were greater (all p < 0.01) on the contralateral-limb of ACL-R compared to CONTROL. There was no change in knee biomechanics after two weeks of the reintroduction to running.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware that substantial and persistent knee underloading does not resolve upon reintroduction to running after ACL-R.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Longitudinal observational study, level III.

Effects of Limb Dominance on Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Gait at 12 Weeks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Patellofemoral joint complications have commonly been reported in long-term outcome studies for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, the biomechanics in the early phases of rehabilitation that could be associated with the development of these abnormalities is unclear. Limb dominance may affect the biomechanics of the knee joint in patients after ACLR.

Purpose:

To compare knee joint loading between surgical and nonsurgical limbs at 12 weeks postoperatively in patients who underwent ACLR on either their dominant limb (ACL-D) or nondominant limb (ACL-ND).

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Included were 54 patients (32 ACL-D and 22 ACL-ND). Peak and integrated patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS), peak patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF), and peak knee extension moment (KEM) were assessed during the stance phase of gait while participants walked on a 10-m runway at a self-selected speed.

Results:

The surgical limb of the ACL-D group had significantly decreased peak PFJS (P < .001), integrated PFJS (P < .001), peak PFJRF (P < .001), and peak KEM (P < .001) compared to the nonsurgical limb. The surgical limb of the ACL-ND group demonstrated significantly increased peak PFJS (P = .001), integrated PFJS (P = .023), peak PFJRF (P < .001), and peak KEM (P = .001) compared to the nonsurgical limb. For the surgical limb, the ACL-ND group demonstrated significantly greater peak PFJS (P < .001), peak PFJRF (P < .001) , (PFJRF [P<.001]) and peak KEM (P < .001) than the ACL-D group. For the nonsurgical limb, the ACL-D group demonstrated greater peak PFJS (P < .001), integrated PFJS (P = .023), peak PFJRF (P = .003), and peak KEM (P < .001) than the ACL-ND group.

Conclusion:

Significantly larger knee joint loading on the surgical limb of the ACL-ND group and smaller knee joint loading on the surgical limb of the ACL-D group were observed compared to the contralateral nonsurgical limb, which suggests that limb dominance has a key role in loading at the knee joint during gait.

Clinical Relevance:

Altered knee joint loading during gait at 12 weeks after ACLR may lead to the development of patellofemoral joint abnormalities.

Patellofemoral contact forces after ACL reconstruction: A longitudinal study

Osteoarthritis (OA) development after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is common. Patellofemoral OA after ACLR is as prevalent as tibiofemoral OA; however, few have explored the mechanisms leading to disease development in this compartment. Biomechanical alterations may be one mechanism responsible for post-traumatic knee OA. Patellofemoral contact forces during dynamic tasks, such as running and single leg hops, have been assessed at return to sport and later time points. The results of these studies, however, contradict each other, are only cross-sectional in nature, and are limited to specific points in time within the movement pattern. The purpose of this study was to assess patellofemoral contact forces 3, 6, and 24 months after ACLR during level walking over the entirety of the movement pattern. Patellofemoral contact forces were calculated after determination of muscle forces from a validated, subject-specific, EMG-driven neuromusculoskeletal model. Statistical parametric mapping was used to compare patellofemoral contact forces between limbs and across time points. Patellofemoral underloading of the involved limb (vs. uninvolved) was present at 3 months (p < 0.001 from 7 to 30% of stance) and 6 months (p = 0.001 from 11 to 23% of stance and p = 0.025 from 27 to 32%) after ACLR but was resolved by 24 months. Both limbs' load increased from 3 to 6 months. The involved limb displayed relatively consistent loads from 6 months onward, while the uninvolved limb's decreased back down towards their 3-month values. Overall, these results suggest that early patellofemoral underloading exists after ACLR and may be leading to patellofemoral OA development.

May the force be with you: understanding how patellofemoral joint reaction force compares across different activities and physical interventions-a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and synthesise patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF) in healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (OA), during everyday activities, therapeutic exercises and with physical interventions (eg, foot orthotics, footwear, taping, bracing).

DESIGN

A systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SportDiscus and Cochrane Library databases were searched.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Observational and interventional studies reporting PFJRF during everyday activities, therapeutic exercises, and physical interventions.

RESULTS

In healthy individuals, the weighted average of mean (±SD) peak PFJRF for everyday activities were: walking 0.9±0.4 body weight (BW), stair ascent 3.2±0.7 BW, stair descent 2.8±0.5 BW and running 5.2±1.2 BW. In those with patellofemoral pain, peak PFJRF were: walking 0.8±0.2 BW, stair ascent 2.5±0.5 BW, stair descent 2.6±0.5 BW, running 4.1±0.9 BW. Only single studies reported peak PFJRF during everyday activities in individuals with patellofemoral OA/articular cartilage defects (walking 1.3±0.5 BW, stair ascent 1.6±0.4 BW, stair descent 1.0±0.5 BW). The PFJRF was reported for many different exercises and physical interventions; however, considerable variability precluded any pooled estimates.

SUMMARY

Everyday activities and exercises involving larger knee flexion (eg, squatting) expose the patellofemoral joint to higher PFJRF than those involving smaller knee flexion (eg, walking). There were no discernable differences in peak PFJRF during everyday activities between healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain/OA. The information on PFJRF may be used to select appropriate variations of exercises and physical interventions.

Local vibration training improves the recovery of quadriceps strength in early rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A feasibility randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), quadriceps strength must be maximised as early as possible.

OBJECTIVES

We tested whether local vibration training (LVT) during the early post-ACLR period (i.e., ∼10 weeks) could improve strength recovery.

METHODS

This was a multicentric, open, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Thirty individuals attending ACLR were randomised by use of a dedicated Web application to 2 groups: vibration (standardised rehabilitation plus LVT, n=16) or control (standardised rehabilitation alone, n=14). Experimenters, physiotherapists and participants were not blinded. Both groups received 24 sessions of standardised rehabilitation over ∼10 weeks. In addition, the vibration group received 1 hour of vibration applied to the relaxed quadriceps of the injured leg at the end of each rehabilitation session. The primary outcome - maximal isometric strength of both injured and non-injured legs (i.e., allowing for limb asymmetry measurement) - was evaluated before ACLR (PRE) and after the 10-week rehabilitation (POST).

RESULTS

Seven participants were lost to follow-up, so data for 23 participants were used in the complete-case analysis. For the injured leg, the mean (SD) decrease in maximal strength from PRE to POST was significantly lower for the vibration than control group (n=11, -16% [10] vs. n=12, -30% [11]; P=0.0045, Cohen's d effect size=1.33). Mean PRE-POST change in limb symmetry was lower for the vibration than control group (-19% [11] vs. -29% [13]) but not significantly (P=0.051, Cohen's d effect size=0.85).

CONCLUSION

LVT improved strength recovery after ACLR. This feasibility study suggests that LVT applied to relaxed muscles is a promising modality of vibration therapy that could be implemented early in ACLR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02929004.

Longitudinal Changes of Patellar Alignment Before and After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft

BACKGROUND

Evidence has suggested that after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), individuals exhibit patellar malalignment; however, it is unknown if patellar alignment changes over time.

PURPOSE

To examine the longitudinal changes in patellar alignment before, 6 months after, and 3 years after ACLR and to compare these variations, if present, with patellar alignment in controls.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients who had ACLR using hamstring autograft (19 male; age, 29.9 ± 7.7 years; body mass index, 23.8 ± 2.5) and 20 controls (13 male; age, 30.4 ± 4.8 years; body mass index, 24.3 ± 2.7) participated. All patients underwent bilateral knee magnetic resonance imaging with the knee in extension and 30° of flexion using sagittal T2-weighted, fat-saturated fast spin-echo images to assess patellar alignment in 6 degrees of freedom: anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and superior-inferior translations; flexion; tilt; and spin. Patients who had ACLR were assessed before (ACL-deficient state) and 6 months and 3 years after ACLR, while control participants were only assessed once. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to examine patellar alignment across time in the ACLR group. If changes were present, the independent t test was carried out to examine the differences between ACLR knees and control knees.

RESULTS

In the knee-extended condition, greater patellar lateral displacement was observed at the ACL-deficient state and 6 months after ACLR compared with 3 years after ACLR within the ACLR group (P < .001 and P = .043, respectively) and compared with the control group (P = .001 and P = .039, respectively). Greater patellar lateral tilt was observed at the ACL-deficient state compared with 3 years after ACLR (P = .003) and compared with the control group (P = .018). In the knee-flexed condition, greater anterior displacement was observed at the ACL-deficient state compared with 3 years after ACLR (P = .001) and compared with the control group (P = .011), and it was also observed at 6 months after ACLR compared with the control group (P = .019). Less lateral spin was observed at the ACL-deficient state (P = .042) and 6 months after ACLR (P = .004) compared with 3 years after ACLR and compared with the control group (P = .004 for both). No patellar alignment measures in the ACLR knees at 3 years were significantly different from those of the controls.

CONCLUSION

Patellar malalignment in individuals before and after ACLR subjected to longitudinal changes, and the differences in alignment between ACLR and controls diminished over 3 years.

Running Biomechanics Before Injury and 1 Year After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Division I Collegiate Athletes

BACKGROUND

Preinjury running biomechanics are an ideal comparator for quantifying recovery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), allowing for assessments within the surgical and nonsurgical limbs. However, availability of preinjury running biomechanics is rare and has been reported in case studies only.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to determine if running biomechanics return to preinjury levels within the first year after ACLR among collegiate athletes. We hypothesized that (1) surgical knee biomechanics would be significantly reduced shortly after ACLR and would not return to preinjury levels by 12 months and (2) nonsurgical limb mechanics would change significantly from preinjury.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Thirteen Division I collegiate athletes were identified between 2015 and 2020 (6 female; mean ± SD age, 20.7 ± 1.3 years old) who had whole body kinematics and ground-reaction forces recorded during treadmill running (3.7 ± 0.6 m/s) before sustaining an ACL injury. Running analyses were repeated at 4, 6, 8, and 12 months (4M, 6M, 8M, 12M) after ACLR. Linear mixed effects models were used to assess differences in running biomechanics between post-ACLR time points and preinjury within each limb, reported as Tukey-adjusted P values.

RESULTS

When compared with preinjury, the surgical limb displayed significant deficits at all postoperative assessments (P values <.01; values reported as least squares mean difference [SE]): peak knee flexion angle (4M, 13.2° [1.4°]; 6M, 9.9° [1.4°]; 8M, 9.8° [1.4°]; 12M, 9.0° [1.5°]), peak knee extensor moment (N·m/kg; 4M, 1.32 [0.13]; 6M, 1.04 [0.13]; 8M, 1.04 [0.13]; 12M, 0.87 [0.15]; 38%-57% deficit), and rate of knee extensor moment (N·m/kg/s; 4M, 22.7 [2.4]; 6M, 17.9 [2.3]; 8M, 17.5 [2.4]; 12M, 16.1 [2.6]; 33%-46% deficit). No changes for these variables from preinjury (P values >.88) were identified in the nonsurgical limb.

CONCLUSION

After ACLR, surgical limb knee running biomechanics were not restored to the preinjury state by 12M, while nonsurgical limb mechanics remained unchanged as compared with preinjury. Collegiate athletes after ACLR demonstrate substantial deficits in running mechanics as compared with preinjury that persist beyond the typical return-to-sport time frame. The nonsurgical knee appears to be a valid reference for recovery of the surgical knee mechanics during running, owing to the lack of change within the nonsurgical limb.

Quadriceps Strength Symmetry Does Not Modify Gait Mechanics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Return-to-Sport Training

BACKGROUND

After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), biomechanical asymmetries during gait are highly prevalent, persistent, and linked to posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis. Quadriceps strength is an important clinical measure associated with preoperative gait asymmetries and postoperative function and is a primary criterion for return-to-sport clearance. Evidence relating symmetry in quadriceps strength with gait biomechanics is limited to preoperative and early rehabilitation time points before return-to-sport training.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to determine the relationship between symmetry in isometric quadriceps strength and gait biomechanics after return-to-sport training in athletes after ACLR. We hypothesized that as quadriceps strength symmetry increases, athletes will demonstrate more symmetric knee joint biomechanics, including tibiofemoral joint loading during gait.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Of 79 athletes enrolled in the ACL-SPORTS Trial, 76 were participants in this study after completing postoperative rehabilitation and 10 return-to-sport training sessions (mean ± SD, 7.1 ± 2.0 months after ACLR). All participants completed biomechanical walking gait analysis and isometric quadriceps strength assessment using an electromechanical dynamometer. Quadriceps strength was calculated using a limb symmetry index (involved limb value / uninvolved limb value × 100). The biomechanical variables of interest included peak knee flexion angle, peak knee internal extension moment, sagittal plane knee excursion at weight acceptance and midstance, quadriceps muscle force at peak knee flexion angle, and peak medial compartment contact force. Spearman rank correlation (ρ) coefficients were used to determine the relationship between limb symmetry indexes in quadriceps strength and each biomechanical variable; alpha was set to .05.

RESULTS

Of the 76 participants, 27 (35%) demonstrated asymmetries in quadriceps strength, defined by quadriceps strength symmetry <90% (n = 23) or >110% (n = 4) (range, 56.9%-131.7%). For the biomechanical variables of interest, 67% demonstrated asymmetry in peak knee flexion angle; 68% and 83% in knee excursion during weight acceptance and midstance, respectively; 74% in internal peak knee extension moment; 57% in medial compartment contact force; and 74% in quadriceps muscle force. There were no significant correlations between quadriceps strength index and limb symmetry indexes for any biomechanical variable after return-to-sport training (P > .129).

CONCLUSION

Among those who completed return-to-sport training after ACLR, subsequent quadriceps strength symmetry was not correlated with the persistent asymmetries in gait biomechanics. After a threshold of quadriceps strength is reached, restoring strength alone may not ameliorate gait asymmetries, and current clinical interventions and return-to-sport training may not adequately target gait.

Effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on patellofemoral joint stress and lower extremity biomechanics at 12 weeks post-surgery and at time of return to sport in adolescent females

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine kinematic and kinetic differences associated with patellofemoral pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between limbs at 12-week post-surgery and at time of return to sport.

METHOD

Twenty-four adolescent females completed 5 consecutive single leg squats on each limb at 12-weeks post-surgery and again during their RTS assessment. Peak knee extension moment, peak hip adduction angle, and patellofemoral joint stress at 45 degrees of knee flexion were calculated. Separate two by two repeated measures ANOVA were performed.

FINDINGS

There was a significant interaction (limb × time) for knee extension moment (p < 0.001). Surgical limb knee extension moment was significantly less than the non-surgical limb at return to sport (p < 0.001). At 12-weeks the surgical limb was significantly less than non-surgical limb (p < 0.001), additionally the surgical limb was significantly greater at time of return to sport than at 12 weeks (p < 0.001). There was a significant main effect of limb for hip adduction angle (p = 0.002). Surgical limb was significantly greater than non-surgical limb (Surgical = 9.84 (SE 1.53) degree, non-surgical = 4.79 (SE 1.01) degree). There was also a main effect of time and limb for patellofemoral joint stress. Return to sport was significantly greater than 12 weeks and the surgical limb was significantly less than non-surgical limb (Surgical = 4.93 (SE 0325) MPa, Nonsurgical = 5.29 (SE 0.30) MPa).

INTERPRETATION

The surgical limb of participants following ACL-R demonstrated variables that have been associated with the development of patellofemoral pain.

Between-Limb Differences in Patellofemoral Joint Forces During Running at 12 to 24 Months After Unilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral joint (PFJ) osteoarthritis may occur after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The mechanisms underpinning the development of PFJ osteoarthritis are not known but may relate to altered PFJ loading. Few studies have assessed PFJ loads during high-impact tasks, such as running, beyond the acute rehabilitation phase (ie, >12 months) after ACLR.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to compare between-limb joint angles, joint moments, and PFJ contact force during running in individuals at 12 to 24 months after unilateral ACLR. We hypothesized that peak knee flexion angle, knee extension moment, and PFJ contact force during stance would be lower in the ACLR limb compared with the uninjured limb.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 55 participants (mean ± SD age, 28 ± 7 years), 12 to 24 months after ACLR, ran at a self-selected speed (2.9 ± 0.3 m/s). Measured kinematics and ground-reaction forces were input into musculoskeletal models to calculate joint moments and muscle forces. These values were subsequently input into a PFJ model to calculate contact force peak and impulse. Outcome measures were compared between the ACLR and uninjured limbs.

RESULTS

In the ACLR limb, compared with the uninjured limb, the PFJ contact force displayed a lower peak (ACLR, 6.1 ± 1.3 body weight [BW]; uninjured, 6.7 ± 1.4 BW; P < .001) and impulse (ACLR, 0.72 ± 0.17 BW*seconds [BWs]; uninjured, 0.81 ± 0.17 BWs; P < .001). At the time of the peak PFJ contact force, the knee extension moment was lower in the ACLR limb (ACLR, 14.0 ± 2.4 %BW*height [%BW*HT]; uninjured, 15.5 ± 2.5 %BW*HT; P < .001). The opposite was true for the ankle plantarflexion moment (ACLR, 12.1 ± 2.6 %BW*HT; uninjured, 11.5 ± 2.7 %BW*HT; P = .019) and the hip extension moment (ACLR, 2.3 ± 2.5 %BW*HT; uninjured, 1.6 ± 2.3 %BW*HT; P = .013). The foot-ground center of pressure was located more anteriorly with respect to the ankle joint center (ACLR, 5.8 ± 0.9 %height [%HT]; uninjured, 5.4 ± 1.0 %HT; P = .001). No differences were found for the sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle angles.

CONCLUSION

The ACLR limb experienced lower peak PFJ loads during running, explained by a small anterior shift in the foot-ground center of pressure during stance that offloaded the torque demand away from the ACLR knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Lower net PFJ loading during running in the ACLR limb more than 12 months after ACLR suggests that underloading might play a role in the onset of PFJ osteoarthritis after ACLR.

Back to Normal Symmetry? Biomechanical Variables Remain More Asymmetrical Than Normal During Jump and Change-of-Direction Testing 9 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), athletes have demonstrated performance asymmetries as compared with healthy cohorts, but little research has investigated if biomechanical asymmetries are also different during jump and change-of-direction (CoD) tasks between groups.

PURPOSE

To identify if differences in magnitude of asymmetry of biomechanical and performance variables exist between these groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Analysis was conducted between 156 male patients 9 months after surgery and 62 healthy participants. Three-dimensional motion capture and analysis were carried out on a double-legged drop jump, a single-legged drop jump, a single-legged hop for distance, and planned and unplanned CoD. Asymmetry between limbs was calculated for each variable with root mean square difference between limbs. Statistical parametric mapping was used to identify the between-group differences in magnitude of asymmetry of performance and biomechanical variables.

RESULTS

There were differences in asymmetry of biomechanical variables across all jump and CoD tests, with greater asymmetries in the ACLR group. The majority of differences between groups were in the sagittal and frontal planes, with more differences found in the jump than CoD tests. The single-legged drop jump demonstrated large differences in performance asymmetry (effect size, 0.94) with small differences for both CoD tests (0.4) and none for the single-legged hop for distance.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated greater asymmetry of biomechanical variables 9 months after ACLR as compared with healthy participants across all tests, suggesting insufficient rehabilitation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study highlights the importance of including biomechanical as well as performance variables when assessing rehabilitation status after ACLR.

REGISTRATION

NCT02771548 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Surgical Technique for Release of Anterior Interval Scarring of the Knee After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Postoperative scarring is a known complication after arthroscopic anterior ligament reconstruction of the knee. The anterior interval of the knee has been previously identified as a common location for anterior scar formation. The anterior interval is defined as the space between the infrapatellar fat pad and the anterior border of the tibia. Patients with anterior interval scarring often present with lack of terminal knee extension, anterior knee pain, decreased patellar mobility, and quadriceps atrophy. The goal of this paper is to describe the technique for anterior interval release of the knee.

Methods to assess patellofemoral joint stress: A systematic review

Changes in patellofemoral joint (PFJ) stress are related to the development and course of PFJ dysfunctions. Different methods for PFJ stress calculation have been used, making the comparison of PFJ stress values across different studies difficult. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the methods for PFJ stress calculation and highlight the differences among the methods. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases. Included studies examined PFJ stress in subjects with or without musculoskeletal conditions. Of 12,670 identified studies, 53 were included, with a total of 1134 subjects evaluated. The main differences among the methods to calculate PFJ stress were: i) method to calculate PFJ contact area; ii) method to calculate a constant (coefficient k) that defines the relation between quadriceps force and PFJ reaction force; iii) the inclusion of adjustments for sagittal plane forces. Considerable variability in PFJ stress results was observed. The greatest PFJ stress value was 55.03 MPa during a dance jump and the lowest value was 1.9 MPa during walking at the speed of 1.4 m/s. Most studies applied methods which use data from previous studies. However, methods which use data from their own participants for most parts of the calculation might be preferred to minimize potential errors. When direct measures are not possible, a standard method could be applied to facilitate comparisons among studies.