The Influence of Ruptured Scar Pattern on the Healing Potential of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant Cells

Do the Differences in the Epiligament of the Proximal and Distal Parts of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Explain Their Different Healing Capacities? Quantitative and Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD34 and α-SMA Expression in Relation to the Epiligament Theory

The aim of this study was to assess the epiligament theory by determining the normal epiligament morphology of the proximal and distal parts of the anterior cruciate ligament in humans and analyzing the differences between them and the midportion of the ligament in terms of cell numbers and expression of CD34 and α-SMA. Samples were obtained from the anterior cruciate ligaments of 12 fresh knee joints. Monoclonal antibodies against CD34 and α-SMA were used for immunohistochemistry. Photomicrographs were analyzed using ImageJ software, version 1.53f. The cell density was higher in the epiligament than in the ligament connective tissue. Cell counts were higher in the proximal and distal thirds than in the midsubstance of the epiligament. CD34 was expressed similarly in the proximal and distal thirds, although it seemed slightly more pronounced in the distal third. α-SMA expression was more robust in the proximal than the distal part. The results revealed that CD34 and α-SMA are expressed in the human epiligament. The differences between the numbers of cells in the proximal and distal parts of the epiligament and the expression of CD34 and α-SMA enhance epiligament theory. Future investigations into improving the quality of ligament healing should not overlook the epiligament theory.

The influence of ruptured scar pattern of human anterior cruciate ligament remnant tissue on tendon-bone healing in vivo

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the transplantation of human cells from a non-reattached injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnant could enhance tendon-bone healing. Human ACL remnant tissue was classified into two groups based on the morphologic pattern as per Crain's classification: (1) non-reattachment group (Crain Ⅳ) and (2) reattachment group (Crain Ⅰ-Ⅲ). Seventy-five 10-week-old immunodeficient rats underwent ACL reconstruction followed by intracapsular administration of one of the following: (1) ACL-derived cells from the non-reattached remnant (non-reattachment group) (n = 5), (2) ACL-derived cells from the reattached tissue (reattachment group) (n = 5), or (3) phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) only (PBS group) (n = 5). Histological (Weeks 2, 4, and 8), immunohistochemical (Week 2), radiographic (Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8), and biomechanical (Week 8) assessments were performed. Histological evaluation showed high and early healing, induction of endochondral ossification-like integration, and mature bone ingrowth at Week 4 in the non-reattachment group. Microcomputed tomography at Week 4 showed that the tibial bone tunnels in the non-reattachment group were significantly reduced compared to those in the reattachment and PBS groups. Moreover, biomechanical testing showed that ultimate load-to-failure in the non-reattachment group tended to be larger than that in the reattachment group, though not statistically significant. The enhanced healing potential in the non-reattachment group was explained by the increase in intrinsic angiogenesis/osteogenesis. In the subacute phase, the ACL-derived cells with the non-reattached morphologic pattern showed greater and earlier tendon bone healing compared with the cells obtained from the reattached morphologic pattern.

A comparative study of the epiligament of the medial collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments in the human knee: Immunohistochemical analysis of CD 34, α-smooth muscle actin and vascular endothelial growth factor in relation to epiligament theory

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated and compared the expression of VEGF, CD34, and α-SMA in the anterior cruciate ligaments and medial collateral ligaments in healthy human knees in order to enrich the epiligament theory regarding ligament healing after injury.

METHODS

Samples from the mid-substance of the anterior cruciate ligament and the medial collateral ligament of 12 fresh knee joints were used. Monoclonal antibodies against CD34, α-SMA, and VEGF were used for immunohistochemical analysis. Photomicrographs were analyzed using the ImageJ software.

RESULTS

The epiligament of the anterior cruciate ligament showed slightly higher expression of CD34, α-SMA, and VEGF than the epiligament of the medial collateral ligament. Overall, among the tested markers, α-SMA expression was most pronounced in anterior cruciate ligament epiligament images and CD34 dominated in medial collateral ligament epiligament images. The intensity of DAB staining for CD34, α-SMA, and VEGF was higher in vascular areas of the epiligament than in epiligament connective tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

The results illustrate that CD34, α-SMA, and VEGF are expressed in the human epiligament. The differences between the epiligament of the investigated ligaments and the fact that CD34, α-SMA, and VEGF, which are known to have a definite role in ligament healing, are predominantly expressed in the main vascular part of the ligament-epiligament complex enlarge the existing epiligament theory. Future investigations regarding better ligament healing should not overlook the epiligament tissue.

Effects of remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Compared with standard anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, it is controversial whether anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with remnant preservation can lead to better clinical outcomes. We conducted a systematic study and meta-analysis to assess the differences in clinical efficacy between the two.

Method

We searched for clinical randomized controlled studies and cohort studies included in the Cochrane library, PubMed, and Embase from March 2012 to March 2022 in English. The included studies were ACLR with or without remant preservation, and the data were extracted and the quality of the included studies was assessed by two authors, respectively. Revman 5.4 was used for statistical analysis and conclusions were presented.

Result

Ten articles containing a total of 777 patients were finally included. There was no significant difference in postoperative Lachman test [OR = 1.66, 95%CI (0.79, 3.49), P = 0.18 > 0.05], Tegner score [SMD = −0.13, 95%CI (−0.47, 0.22), P = 0.46 > 0.05], synovial coverage rate by second-look arthroscopy [OR = 1.55, 95%CI (0.66, 3.65), P = 0.32 > 0.05], the rate of cyclops lesion [OR = 3.92, 95%CI (0.53, 29.29), P = 0.18 > 0.05], joint range of motion [SMD = 0.27, 95%CI (−0.13, 0.68), P = 0.19 > 0.05] and re-injury rate [OR = 0.57, 95%CI (0.18, 1.74), P = 0.32 > 0.05] between the two groups. There were statistically significant differences in postoperative Lysholm score [SMD = 0.98, 95% CI (0.32, 1.64), P = 0.004 < 0.05], International Knee Documantation Committee grade (IKDC grade) [OR = 2.19, 95%CI (1.03, 4.65), P = 0.04 < 0.05], Pivot shift test [OR = 1.71, 95%CI (1.06, 2.77), P = 0.03 < 0.05], KT1000/2000 arthrometer side-to-side difference [SMD = −0.22, 95%CI (−0.42, −0.03), P = 0.02 < 0.05], operation time [SMD = 11.69, 95%CI (8.85, 14.54), P = 0.00001 < 0.05] and degree of tibial tunnel enlargement [SMD = −0.66, 95%CI (−1.08, −0.23), P = 0.002 < 0.05].

Conclusion

This meta-analysis concluded that remnant preservation significantly had better results in terms of patient functional score (Lysholm, IKDC), knee stability (Pivot shift test, postoperative side-to-side anterior laxity) and tibial tunnel enlargement. In terms of complications (incidence of Cyclops lesions, range of motion, re-injury rate), no significant differences were seen between the two groups. Although many studies concluded that remnant preservation could bring better synovial coverage, this meta-analysis indicated that there is insufficient evidence to support it, possibly due to different remnant preservation procedures.The potential risks associated with longer operation times are also worth considering.

Remnant preserving ACL reconstruction with a functional remnant is related to improved laxity but not to improved clinical outcomes in comparison to a nonfunctional remnant

PURPOSE

The Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnant has been pointed out as a ligamentization enhancer. Nonetheless, the remaining tissue can be functional if it still provides some stability or nonfunctional. This study intends to compare the clinical results and knee stability of functional vs. nonfunctional remnant preservation ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-five patients with ACL injuries were included and underwent remnant preservation ACLR. They were divided into two groups accordingly to remnant tissue functionality: functional (Group F) and nonfunctional (Group NF). Primary outcome was defined as patient reported outcomes measured with Lysholm, IKDC and Tegner continuous scales and improvements. Secondary outcomes comprised of Lachman test, anterior drawer test, pivot shift test, extension and flexion deficit, graft coverage by remnant preserved tissue and failure rate (persistent instability or new ACL lesion). Menisci lesions, cartilage lesions and time to surgery were also recorded for each group.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-four patients were available at a mean of 30.2 ± 10.1 months: 69 Functional and 75 Nonfunctional. Lysholm, IKDC and Tegner functional outcomes demonstrated no difference between the groups, Functional compared to Nonfunctional: 88.4 ± 10.5 vs. 92.2 ± 4.9, n.s. and 83.2 ± 11.3 vs. 87 ± 5.3, n.s. and 6 (5-10) vs. 6 (5-9), n.s., respectively. Lysholm and IKDC functional outcomes improvements demonstrated differences between the groups: Functional compared to Nonfunctional (39.3 ± 9.4 vs. 42.3 ± 7.4, p = 0.014 and 37.7 ± 10 vs. 41.0 ± 6.6, p = 0.032); however, they were not clinically significant. Functional group showed more stability on physical examination pre- and post-operatively (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). There was no difference regarding extension deficit (n.s.); however, functional group had more flexion deficit (p = 0.02). Nonfunctional group had better graft coverage (p = 0.001). There was no difference regarding failure rate: 4% vs. 9%, (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Both remnant preservation ACLR techniques were able to achieve satisfactory functional outcomes. A functional remnant was not related to improved functional outcomes in comparison to a nonfunctional remnant; however, it was related to less laxity pre and postoperatively and inferior graft coverage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Effect of Remnant-Preserving Reconstruction of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in a Rabbit Model: Histological and Biomechanical Analysis

Acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a key structure that stabilizes knee joints. The objective of this research is to investigate the influence of ligament remnants preserved on the tendon-bone healing following ACL reconstruction and to examine postoperative articular cartilage degeneration in rabbit as a model animal. Sixty New Zealand rabbits are randomly divided into an ACL reconstruction without remnant preservation group (Group A; n = 30) or ACL reconstruction with remnant preservation group (Group B; n = 30). The expression of HIF-1α, VEGF, and micro vessel density (MVD) in the transplanted tendon was detected by immunohistochemical staining at week 6 and 12 after the operation. The signal intensity of the transplanted tendon was observed by MRI scanning, and the width of the bone tunnel was measured by CT scanning at week 6 and 12 after the operation. The graft biomechanics was tested 12 weeks after the operation. The JNK and MMP-13 expression levels were compared to analyze the cartilage degeneration of the knee at week 12 after the operation. The experimental results were analyzed and showed that the remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction is beneficial for bone healing of the tendon in rabbits, but ACL reconstruction with or without ligament remnants preserved will not affect knee articular cartilage degeneration post-surgery.

The Reliability of Classifying the Morphology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnants during Surgery

Arthroscopic classification of the torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) morphology is fundamental for clinical studies on emerging techniques such as repair and preservation. At present, the most acknowledged classification is Crain description of four morphological patterns. The purpose of the study was to analyze the intra- and interobserver reliability of Crain classification in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries. The study included 101 patients who had ACL reconstruction surgery between the years 2014 and 2017. The morphological pattern of ACL remnant scar formation during surgery was observed and classified according to Crain by three orthopaedic surgeons. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were measured using kappa statistics. Intraobserver reliability for the Crain classification ranged from 0.63 to 0.83 (substantial to almost perfect agreement). Interobserver reliability was 0.51 (moderate agreement). In almost a third of the cases, observers reported on additional morphological pattern of scar formation that was not well defined by Crain. A modified classification of four patterns was suggested: (A) without scar tissue, (B) with adhesion to the femoral notch (wall or roof), (C) with adhesion to the notch and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and (D) with adhesion to the PCL. Reanalysis of these four morphological configurations resulted in interobserver reliability of 0.82 (almost perfect agreement). In conclusion, the Crain classification of torn ACL remnant morphology has moderate interobserver reliability; however, a suggested classification with modified and additional configurations has almost perfect reliability and may be useful for studies on ACL repair and preservation.

Remnant-Tensioning Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provides Comparable Stability to and Better Graft Vascularity Than Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Acute or Subacute Injury: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical, second-look arthroscopic, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) findings between remnant-tensioning single-bundle (RT-SB) and double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with acute or subacute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury were randomized to undergo RT-SB or DB ACLR. Twenty-six patients in the RT-SB group and 28 in the DB group were evaluated using stability tests (Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-2000 arthrometer) and multiple clinical scores. One year postoperatively, all 54 patients underwent MRI for evaluation of graft continuity and graft signal/noise quotient and DCE-MRI for the calculation of normalized area under the curve (nAUC) as a marker of graft vascularity. Among them, 41 patients underwent second-look arthroscopy for the evaluation of graft continuity, graft tension, and synovialization. The results were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

At the minimum 2-year follow-up (28.7 ± 6.4 months), the stability tests, clinical scores, second-look arthroscopic findings, and MRI findings were not significantly different between the groups. However, the mean nAUC values on DCE-MRI for the ACL graft were significantly higher in the RT-SB group than those in the DB group in all 3 zones (nAUC_proximal, P = .005; nAUC_middle, P = .021; nAUC_distal, P = .027; and nAUC_average, P = .008).

CONCLUSION

For acute or subacute ACL injury, the RT-SB ACLR showed an outcome comparable to that of DB ACLR in terms of knee stability, clinical scores, MRI findings, and second-look arthroscopic findings. Moreover, RT-SB ACLR showed better graft vascularity 1 year postoperatively than DB ACLR using DCE-MRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation: current concepts

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are a common knee injury, and anatomic ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is now the standard of care to restore knee stability. Nevertheless, re-tear rates exceeding 5% are commonly reported, with an even higher percentage of patients unable to achieve preinjury knee function. As the torn ACL remnant contains elements (eg, cells, blood vessels and mechanoreceptors) essential to ACL function, it has been hypothesised that ACLR with remnant preservation may improve graft remodelling, in turn more quickly and completely restoring ACL structure and function. In this Current Concepts review, we summarise the present understanding of ACLR with remnant preservation, which includes selective bundle reconstruction of partial (one-bundle) ACL tears and single- and double-bundle ACLR with minimal to partial debridement of the torn ACL stump. Reported benefits of remnant preservation include accelerated graft revascularisation and remodelling, improved proprioception, decreased bone tunnel enlargement, individualised anatomic bone tunnel placement, improved objective knee stability and early mechanical support (with selective bundle reconstruction) to healing tissues. However, clinical studies of ACLR with remnant preservation are heterogeneous in the description of remnant characteristics and surgical technique. Presently, there is insufficient evidence to support the superiority of ACLR with remnant preservation over the standard technique. Future studies should better describe the ACL tear pattern, remnant volume, remnant quality and surgical technique. Progress made in understanding and applying remnant preservation may inform, and be reciprocally guided by, ongoing research on ACL repair. The goal of research on ACLR with remnant preservation is not only to achieve anatomic structural restoration of the ACL but also to facilitate biologic healing and regeneration to ensure a more robust and functional graft.

Anterior cruciate ligament remnant cells have different potentials for cell differentiation based on their location

Histological and cytological observations of the human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) had been described, but the differentiation potency based on their location is still unknown. To determine and compare proliferation and differentiation potential of cells derived from distal and middle thirds of the ACL remnant, ACL remnant was initially marked at the distal third (within 10  mm from the tibial insertion) and middle third (between 10-20  mm from the tibial insertion) and then dissected. Both the middle and distal third regions of ACL remnant were analyzed using CD34+ cell counting. Cell proliferation rate did not differ in both middle and distal third regions of ACL remnant, but they showed different characteristics in cell differentiation depending on their location. The distal third region of the ACL remnant had a tendency for chondrogenic differentiation with higher expression of CD34+ cells. On the other hand, the middle third region of ACL remnant had a strong tendency for osteogenic and ligamentous differentiation. Characteristics of the ACL remnant tissues should be considered when performing remnant-preserving or harvesting ACL remnants for tissue engineering.

The detached stump of the torn anterior cruciate ligament adheres to the femoral notch wall and then to the posterior cruciate ligament within 6 months from injury

PURPOSE

To evaluate the progressive changes in the morphology of traumatic ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) over time. A secondary objective was evaluating their correlation with meniscal tears or chondral lesions.

METHODS

The study included one hundred and one patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery of the knee after a definite date of injury. The torn ACL remnant morphological pattern was assessed and classified during arthroscopy. A correlation analysis was performed between the pathological features of the remnant and the time length from injury. In addition, correlation between ACL remnant subtypes and meniscal tears or chondral lesions was evaluated.

RESULTS

At surgery there were four distinct ACL tear morphological patterns that were correlated to the time span from injury (r = 0.61, p < 0.001) and ended with scarring of the femoral remnant to the posterior cruciate ligament. The early pattern was noticed within median time of 2.6 months from injury and appeared as a separate stump with no scar tissue. The following two patterns appeared within 6 months from injury and were characterized by adhesion of scar tissue to different locations in the femoral notch. The last morphological pattern appeared as adherence of the ACL stump to the posterior cruciate ligament. This pattern was seen in some patients within 6 months from injury but was the dominant pattern later on and was also correlated with meniscal tears.

CONCLUSIONS

During the first 3 months from injury the gross morphological features of the torn ACL remnant showed no scar. This phase was followed by scarring of the femoral remnant at first to the femoral notch, and eventually to the posterior cruciate ligament within 6 months from injury and later on. Therefore, further research on the healing potential of the human ACL stump and its biological environment should be focused on the first 3 months from injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.