Clinical and Functional Outcomes by Graft Type in Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Achilles Allograft Can Reverse Pseudoparalysis While Improving Functional Patient Outcomes

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears represent a vexing problem, particularly in the physiologically young patient with no glenohumeral arthritis and high functional expectations. Not even the last line of defense, the reverse shoulder arthroplasty, can help all of our patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and resultant pseudoparalysis, and in younger patients, joint preservation could be a preferable first-line intervention. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) shares the joint-preservation arena with an evolving multitude of options, including arthroscopic debridement, partial rotator cuff repair, biologic tuberoplasty, interposition balloon spacer, and lower trapezius tendon transfer. SCR shows promising biomechanical and clinical outcomes, including restoration of native glenohumeral biomechanics and contact pressures, achievement of humeral head depression, reduction of pain, and improved patient-reported outcome measures and range of motion, despite a high rate of graft retear or discontinuity. Yet, comparable results may be achieved via simpler procedures, including debridement, partial repair, tuberoplasty, and/or spacer. Ultimately, the true value of SCR, or any other technique, would be proven improvement in strength or survivorship from subsequent surgery, particularly reverse arthroplasty. Optimizing indications for these constantly evolving techniques is a moving target and essential for selecting the greatest value procedures for patients on the basis of their individual needs.

Effects of Biceps Rerouting on In Vivo Glenohumeral Kinematics in the Treatment of Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic repair with the biceps rerouting (BR) technique has been determined to lead to promising clinical and biomechanical outcomes for treating large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs). However, the in vivo effects of BR on glenohumeral kinematics during functional shoulder movements have not been fully elucidated.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether BR provides a better restoration of shoulder kinematics compared with conventional rotator cuff repair (RCR).

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent either repair with the BR technique (BR group) or RCR alone (RCR group) for treating LMRCTs between January 2021 and May 2022 were enrolled. They underwent a 1-year postoperative kinematic evaluation of bilateral shoulders by performing scapular-plane abduction with a dual fluoroscopic imaging system. Glenohumeral translation in the superior-inferior (S-I) and anterior-posterior (A-P) directions was assessed in shoulder abduction at 10° increments. Moreover, the mean, maximum, minimum, and range of glenohumeral translation were calculated throughout the entire movement.

RESULTS

A total of 9 patients were enrolled in each group for final analysis, and baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. In the RCR group, compared with contralateral shoulders, the operative shoulders showed increased superior humeral head translation during lower abduction angles of 30° to 50° (all P≤ .004), with a greater maximum (P = .014) and a larger range (P = .002) for S-I translation throughout the entire movement. In the BR group, no significant differences between operative and contralateral shoulders were detected in any kinematic variables for S-I translation (all P≥ .132); however, the operative shoulders exhibited a larger maximum (P = .031), a smaller minimum (P = .008), and a larger range (P < .001) for A-P translation throughout the entire movement compared with the contralateral shoulders.

CONCLUSION

BR successfully reduced residual superior humeral head translation compared with conventional RCR and restored normal S-I glenohumeral kinematics in the treatment of LMRCTs. However, A-P glenohumeral kinematics was not fully restored after BR, and its effect on long-term clinical outcomes requires further investigation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

BR can be a promising technique to treat LMRCTs. However, its potential adverse effects on A-P glenohumeral kinematics should not be ignored, requiring further clinical evidence to determine long-term outcomes.

Which muscle is the external rotation compensator after superior capsular reconstruction?

Background

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is a surgical option for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, particularly involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. In this procedure, the torn infraspinatus is not repaired or reconstructed. However, an improvement in postoperative external rotation (ER) angle and strength is observed. There is a lack of studies explaining how ER is restored after SCR. The aim of this study is to identify the ER compensator by assessing the muscle volume of the posterior deltoid and teres minor.

Methods

Sixty-eight patients with massive rotator cuff tears underwent SCR during 2016-2021. Of these patients, 28 who met the following inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed: (1) massive rotator cuff tears, including the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, (2) severe muscle atrophy and fatty change, (3) intact or reparable subscapularis tendon, and (4) Hamada of grade 3 or lower. Posterior deltoid and teres minor volume were measured using open-source medical image processing software preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The percentage of the posterior deltoid and teres minor muscle volume change was compared between patients with 1-year postoperative ER manual muscle testing (MMT) of grade 5 and of grade < 5. The relationship between grade of fatty change, percentage of the muscle volume change, and ER angle and strength were evaluated.

Results

There was a significant increase in the 1-year postoperative teres minor volume compared with the preoperative volume (24.6 ± 10.3 cm³ vs. 20.9 ± 8.3 cm³, P < .000), while the posterior deltoid volume remained unchanged (178.1 ± 48.3 cm³ vs. 178.8 ± 47 cm³). Patients with ER MMT of grade 5 had a greater teres minor volume change compared to those with an ER MMT grade of less than 5 (22.3% vs. 9.4%), although this difference was not significant (P = .074, 95% CI = -1.3 to 27.0). The posterior deltoid volume showed no significant change. The percentage of teres minor volume change had a weak positive correlation with ER strength (r = 0.308, P = .055, 95% CI = -0.02 to 1.0). There was a significant negative correlation between ER strength and the severity of both preoperative and postoperative fatty changes in the teres minor (r = -0.258, P = .065, 95% CI = -1.0 to -0.042 and r = -0.323, P = .028, 95% CI = -1.0 to -0.113, respectively). The pre and postoperative fatty changes in the teres minor were negatively correlated with the percentage of teres minor volume change (r = -0.298, P = .062, 95% CI = -1.0 to 0.031 and r = -0.413, P = .015, 95% CI = -1.0 to -0.1, respectively).

Conclusion

The teres minor may serve as a potential compensator for ER in patients with massive rotator cuff tears following SCR.

Superior capsular reconstruction of the shoulder with biceps autograft vs. Achilles allograft: A 2-year comparative study

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the clinical-functional outcomes, healing rates, complications, and surgical time in patients treated with superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using long head of the biceps autograft (LHB) and Achilles allograft (AA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 24 patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, treated with SCR. Two treatment groups were formed: one with 12 cases using AA and another with 12 cases using LHB. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years.

RESULTS

The SSV was 73.7±25.3 vs. 86.0±8.7 (p=0.26), the Constant score was 76.8±20.1 vs. 83.7±4.6 (p=0.12), and the VAS was 1.6±2.3 vs. 1.7±0.5 (p=0.9) for the LHB and AA groups, respectively. Tendon healing was 66.7% in AA and 100% in LHB (p=0.001). Complications were 50% in AA and 0% in LHB. The average surgical time was 127.7±37.6minutes for AA and 84.3±14.3min for LHB (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SCR with LHB showed better results in terms of tendon healing, fewer complications, and reduced surgical time compared to the use of AA.

Which Factors Are Associated With Rerupture After Superior Capsular Reconstruction of the Shoulder With Autologous Long Biceps Tendon? - A Systematic Review

Based on a systematic review, the present work analyses factors associated with the rerupture rate or non-healing after superior capsular reconstruction with autologous long biceps tendon in the reconstruction of the rotator cuff of the shoulder.A systematic review of the U.S. National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health (PubMed) database and the Cochrane Library was conducted in September 2021 using the PRISMA checklist. Articles were identified and analysed that contained data on the rerupture rate after superior capsular reconstruction with autologous long biceps tendon in reconstruction of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. The aim was to identify factors associated with rerupture or non-healing. The risk of bias was determined using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.Primarily 86 hits could be generated. Seven articles from 2020 and 2021 met the inclusion criteria and were further analysed in terms of content. The evidence level was III to IV. Follow-up was between 12 (minimum) and 24 to 48 months. The risk of bias was not low. Factors that may be associated with rerupture or non-healing are diabetes mellitus and high-grade fatty degeneration of the subscapularis, infraspinatus, or teres minor as preoperative factors. Age, percent footprint coverage, tear size, symptom duration, number of bundles, acromioplasty performed, and tear configuration were not significant factors. Gender, degree of fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus and lesions of the subscapularis tendon were rated differently.According to the literature, but still currently with short-term observation periods, superior capsular reconstruction with an autologous long biceps tendon is another treatment option in the case of massive tears and elderly patients, if there is no high-grade fatty degeneration of the subscapularis, infraspinatus or teres minor. Diabetes mellitus has an unfavorable prognosis. Additional acromioplasty has so far not been associated with better outcomes.

Pseudoparalysis and Pseudoparesis of the Shoulder: Definitions, Management, and Outcomes

Loss of shoulder function can be a complex condition to manage. Specifically, the definition between the terms pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis remains inconsistent in the literature based on various factors including chronicity, present pathology, and the role of pain in the loss of function. There is also debate as to the optimal management strategies for these challenging conditions. In the setting of advanced glenohumeral arthritis or arthropathy in the correct patient, arthroplasty provides consistent and reliable results. However, in younger patients or the patient without arthritis, arthroplasty may not be the best option. In some cases, addressing pain with biceps procedures, balloon spacer placement, débridement, or others may be appropriate. However, other instances may require attempts at improving shoulder kinematics with procedures such as rotator cuff repair, superior capsular reconstruction, and tendon transfer. In this review, we discuss current definitions for pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis, in addition to reviewing the indications for the various treatment options and their respective outcomes.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using an Acellular Dermal Xenograft or Allograft Improves Shoulder Function but Is Associated with a High Graft Failure Rate

Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes, graft integrity rate and progression of osteoarthritis after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) at short-term follow-up. Methods: Consecutive patients that underwent SCR using an acellular dermal xeno- or allograft between May 2018 and June 2020 for the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears were included. Shoulder function (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score), pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] for pain) and active shoulder range of motion (ROM) were evaluated preoperatively and after a minimum of 24 months postoperatively. Isometric strength was measured at follow-up and compared to the contralateral side. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to evaluate graft integrity and osteoarthritis progression (shoulder osteoarthritis severity [SOAS] score). Results: Twenty-two patients that underwent SCR using a xeno- (n = 9) or allograft (n = 13) were evaluated 33.1 ± 7.2 months postoperatively. Four patients in the xenograft group underwent revision surgery due to pain and range of motion limitations and were excluded from further analysis (revision rate: 18.2%). Shoulder function (ASES score: 41.6 ± 18.8 to 72.9 ± 18.6, p < 0.001), pain levels (VAS for pain: 5.8 ± 2.5 to 1.8 ± 2.0, p < 0.001) and active flexion (p < 0.001) as well as abduction ROM (p < 0.001) improved significantly from pre- to postoperatively. Active external rotation ROM did not improve significantly (p = 0.924). Isometric flexion (p < 0.001), abduction (p < 0.001) and external rotation strength (p = 0.015) were significantly lower in the operated shoulder compared to the non-operated shoulder. Ten shoulders demonstrated a graft tear at the glenoid (n = 8, 44.4%) or humerus (n = 2, 11.1%). Graft lysis was observed in seven shoulders (38.9%). The graft was intact in one shoulder (5.6%), which was an allograft. A significant progression of shoulder osteoarthritis was observed at follow-up (SOAS score: 42.4 ± 10.1 to 54.6 ± 8.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions: At short-term follow-up, SCR using an acellular dermal xeno- or allograft resulted in improved shoulder function and pain with limitations in active external rotation ROM and isometric strength. Graft failure rates were high and osteoarthritis progressed significantly. Level of Evidence: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Margin convergence vs. superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: outcomes are equivalent unless there is preoperative pseudoparesis

BACKGROUND

Margin convergence (MC) and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) are common treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears in younger patients, although they differ in associated costs and operative times. The purpose of this study was to compare range of motion, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and reoperation rates following MC and SCR. We hypothesized superior outcomes after SCR relative to MC regarding functional outcomes, subjective measures, and reoperation rates.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective review of 59 patients from 3 surgeons treating irreparable rotator cuff tears with either MC (n = 28) or SCR (n = 31) and minimum 1-year follow-up from 2014-2019. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), active forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER), retear rate, and conversion rate to reverse shoulder arthroplasty were evaluated. t tests and χ2 tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively (P < .05).

RESULTS

Baseline demographics, range of motion, and magnetic resonance imaging findings were similar between groups. Average follow-up was 31.5 months and 17.8 months for the MC and SCR groups, respectively (P < .001). The MC and SCR groups had similar postoperative FF (151° ± 26° vs. 142° ± 38°; P = .325) and ER (48° ± 12° vs. 46° ± 11°; P = .284), with both groups not improving significantly from their preoperative baselines. However, both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in VAS score (MC: 7.3 to 2.5; SCR: 6.4 to 1.0) and SSV (MC: 54% to 82%; SCR: 38% to 87%). There were no significant differences in postoperative VAS scores, SSV, and rates of retear or rates of conversion to arthroplasty between the MC and SCR groups. In patients with preoperative pseudoparesis (FF < 90°), SCR (n = 9) resulted in greater postoperative FF than MC (n = 5) (141° ± 38° vs. 67° ± 24°; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Both MC and SCR demonstrated excellent postoperative outcomes in the setting of massive irreparable rotator cuff tear, with significant improvements in PROs and no significant differences in range of motion. Specifically for patients with preoperative pseudoparesis, SCR was more effective in restoring forward elevation. Further long-term studies are needed to compare outcomes and establish appropriate indications.

Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Treated With a Tuberoplasty Yield Favorable Clinical Outcomes With Variable Rates of Complications: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the patient-reported outcomes and postoperative complications following tuberoplasty for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE computerized databases from database inception to June 2023 in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Included studies evaluated clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and reoperation rates following tuberoplasty for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Exclusion criteria consisted of non-English language, cadaveric studies, case reports, animal studies, studies with overlapping cohorts, letters to editors, and review articles. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. Clinical outcome scores included the visual analog scale for pain, University of California Los Angeles score, and Constant score.

RESULTS

Seven studies from 2002 to 2023 consisting of 123 patients with a mean age of 66.5 years (mean range, 63-70.4 years) were included. The mean follow-up time ranged from 18 to 98 months. The mean Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score was 13.5 (range, 13-15). At final follow-up, the mean postoperative visual analog scale pain scores ranged from 2.3 to 2.5, University of California-Los Angeles shoulder score from 27.2 to 27.7, and Constant scores from 59.2 to 90.6. Postoperative active forward flexion and abduction ranged from 131° to 165°, and 123° to 160°, respectively. The change in acromiohumeral distance postoperatively ranged from -1 mm to -0.6 mm. The rate of postoperative complications ranged from 0% to 19% of patients, while 0% to 19% of patients underwent revision surgery to reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Tuberoplasty for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears results in good clinical outcomes with significant pain relief in select populations. However, the variable reoperation rates should be considered when counseling patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Glenohumeral Superior Translation and Subacromial Contract Pressure Are Both Improved With Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Investigations

PURPOSE

To review cadaveric studies evaluating the biomechanical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with different graft types for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff (RTC) tears.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were queried in January 2022 to conduct this meta-analysis using the following key words: "superior capsule reconstruction," "superior capsular reconstruction," and "biomechanics." Articles were included if they reported glenohumeral superior translation or subacromial contact pressure following SCR in cadaveric RTC tears. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses criteria. Number of shoulders, graft types, and biomechanical outcomes were recorded and analyzed with forest plots.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (95 shoulders) were included in the statistical analysis. There was a significant reduction in glenohumeral superior translation following SCR compared with RTC tear across 10 studies (79 shoulders) with standardized mean difference (SMD) -2.48 mm; confidence interval (CI) -3.28 mm, -1.69 mm. The SMD between fascia lata graft and RTC tear was -3.84 mm (CI -4.82 mm, -2.86 mm) and between dermal allograft and RTC tear was -2.05 mm (CI -3.10 mm, -1.00 mm). There was a significant reduction in subacromial contact pressure following SCR compared with RTC tear across 5 studies (55 shoulders) with SMD -3.49 MPa (CI -4.54 MPa, -2.44 MPa). The SMD between fascia lata graft and RTC tear was -3.21 MPa (CI -5.08 MPa, -1.34 MPa) and between dermal allograft and RTC tear was -3.89 MPa (CI -5.91 MPa, -1.87 MPa).

CONCLUSIONS

Independent of graft type, biomechanical studies suggest that SCR improves glenohumeral superior translation and subacromial contact pressure in comparison with RTC tear at time zero. There was no definitive evidence identified in this study to suggest a biomechanically superior SCR graft option.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Investigating the biomechanical outcomes of several graft types for superior capsular reconstruction will help surgeons better understand the efficacies of different graft types for use in superior capsule reconstruction surgery.

Superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears

Although the superior portion of the shoulder joint capsule is a clearly distinct structure, its ability to prevent vertical humeral head translation in irreparable rotator cuff tears remains controversial. The clinical results of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in this context are satisfactory but the radiological outcomes are poor in up to two-thirds of patients. Moreover, there is no proof that SCR is more beneficial than simply doing a subacromial debridement, a partial repair or a tenotomy of the long head of biceps. Furthermore, graft healing is not predictive of success. Given the lack of comparative studies with high level of evidence (level 1 or 2), we cannot conclude that this surgical technique (and its many variants) has a place in our treatment paradigm. Also, it seems that xenografts are no longer being used given the high rate of structural failure seen on MRI and the large number of complications. If the long head of biceps tendon is still intact at the time of surgery, it is a feasible option for SCR given the reasonable cost and minimal complications. If it is not - but the subscapularis tendon is intact or repairable - an allograft or a non-local autograft should be considered, despite its unpredictable clinical results. Surgeons should inform patients of the high rate of radiological repair failure and the worse results if a reverse shoulder arthroplasty should be needed subsequently. Level of evidence: 4.

The long head of the biceps tendon: a valuable tool in shoulder surgery

ANATOMY AND FUNCTION

The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) has different properties and characteristics that render it a valuable tool in the hands of shoulder surgeons. Its accessibility, biomechanical strength, regenerative capabilities, and biocompatibility allow it to be a valuable autologous graft for repairing and augmenting ligamentous and muscular structures in the glenohumeral joint.

SHOULDER SURGERY APPLICATIONS

Numerous applications of the LHBT have been described in the shoulder surgery literature, including augmentation of posterior-superior rotator cuff repair, augmentation of subscapularis peel repair, dynamic anterior stabilization, anterior capsule reconstruction, post-stroke stabilization, and superior capsular reconstruction. Some of these applications have been described meticulously in technical notes and case reports, whereas others may require additional research to confirm clinical benefit and efficacy.

CONCLUSION

This review examines the role of the LHBT as a source of local autograft, with biological and biomechanical properties, in aiding outcomes of complex primary and revision shoulder surgery procedures.

Outcomes After Superior Capsular Reconstruction With an Achilles Tendon-Bone Allograft Using the Modified Keyhole Technique: A 2-Year Follow-up of a Novel Technique for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Background

Despite improved outcomes, failure or nonhealing of graft materials has been reported after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Purpose

To evaluate the short-term clinical and radiological outcomes of a novel technique for SCR using an Achilles tendon-bone allograft.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent SCR using an Achilles tendon-bone allograft with the modified keyhole technique and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The visual analog scale score for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant score were evaluated as subjective outcomes, while range of motion of the shoulder joint and isokinetic strength were evaluated as objective outcomes. The acromiohumeral interval (AHI), bone-to-bone healing of the allograft and humeral head on computed tomography, and graft integrity on magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated as radiological outcomes.

Results

This study included 32 patients with a mean age of 56.8 ± 4.2 years and a mean follow-up of 28.4 ± 6.2 months. A significant improvement from preoperatively to the last follow-up was seen in the mean visual analog scale score for pain (from 6.7 to 1.8), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (from 42.7 to 83.8), Constant score (from 47.2 to 78.5), and AHI (from 4.8 to 8.2 mm) (P < .001 for all) as well as range of motion in forward elevation and internal rotation (P < .001 for both). Medial-to-lateral graft integrity was good in all patients. Nonunion at the fitting zone of the keyhole on the greater tuberosity was diagnosed in 1 case (3.1%), and failure of incorporation between the allograft and remnant tendon at the site of posterior margin convergence was observed in 4 cases (12.5%).

Conclusion

The outcomes after SCR using an Achilles tendon-bone allograft and the keyhole technique improved, with an increased AHI and excellent integrity in the medial and lateral directions compared with preoperatively. This technique is a reasonable option for the surgical treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Biomechanical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears by different graft materials-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCT) are defined as defects that cannot be repaired due to tendon retraction, fat infiltration, or muscle atrophy. One surgical remedy for IRCT is superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), which fixes graft materials between the larger tuberosity and the superior glenoid.

Patients and methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria were followed for conducting the systematic review and meta-analysis. From their inception until February 25, 2022, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library's electronic databases were searched. Studies using cadavers on SCR for IRCT were also included. The humeral head's superior translation and subacromial peak contact pressure were the primary outcomes. The humeral head's anteroposterior translation, the kind of graft material used, its size, and the deltoid load were the secondary outcomes.

Results

After eliminating duplicates from the search results, 1,443 unique articles remained, and 20 papers were finally included in the quantitative research. In 14 investigations, the enhanced superior translation of the humeral head was documented in IRCTs. In 13 studies, a considerable improvement following SCR was found, especially when using fascia lata (FL), which could achieve more translation restraints than human dermal allograft (HDA) and long head of bicep tendon (LHBT). Six investigations reported a subacromial peak contact pressure increase in IRCTs, which could be rectified by SCR, and these studies found a substantial increase in this pressure. The results of the reduction in subacromial peak contact pressure remained consistent regardless of the graft material utilized for SCR. While there was a statistically significant difference in the change of graft material length between FL and HDA, the change in graft material thickness between FL and HDA was not significant. The humeral head's anterior-posterior translation was rising in IRCTs and could be returned to its original state with SCR. In five investigations, IRCTs caused a significant increase in deltoid force. Furthermore, only one study showed that SCR significantly decreased deltoid force.

Conclusion

With IRCT, SCR might significantly decrease the glenohumeral joint's superior and anterior-posterior stability. Despite the risks for donor-site morbidity and the longer recovery time, FL is still the best current option for SCR.