The futility of post-haemodialysis blood glucose levels: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Frequent blood glucose tests are performed for people with diabetes receiving haemodialysis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rate of out-of-range post-haemodialysis blood glucose levels that are clinically acted upon, the intervention and outcome of each intervention, and the associations between post-haemodialysis blood glucose levels and relevant clinical predictors.

DESIGN

12-month retrospective cohort medical record review in one Australian haemodialysis centre. Post-haemodialysis blood glucose levels, prehaemodialysis blood glucose levels, time of treatment, diabetes medications, intradialytic fluid removal, dialysate dextrose concentration, clinical actions, interventions, and outcomes on out-of-range blood glucose levels were retrieved.

PARTICIPANTS

22 participants with a median time receiving dialysis 3.1 years (interquartile range 2.3-4.7).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The proportion of out-of-range post-haemodialysis blood glucose levels was 87.3% (95% confidence interval, 86.1%-88.5%). No out-of-range post-haemodialysis blood glucose levels were clinically acted upon. Out-of-range post-haemodialysis blood glucose levels were 4.6 times more likely if a higher dextrose bath was used (95% confidence interval: 3.3; 6.3. p < 0.001). The odds of the post-haemodialysis blood glucose levels increased by each 1 mmol/L. Intradialytic fluid removal, dialysate dextrose concentration, sex, dialysis time, anti-hyperglycaemic agents were also associated with out-of-range post-haemodialysis blood glucose levels.

CONCLUSION

Routine post-haemodialysis blood glucose levels testing has limited clinical utility in care for people with diabetes receiving maintenance haemodialysis. Higher dextrose dialysate may require individual titration depending on prehaemodialysis blood glucose levels.

Glucose variability in maintenance hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes: Comparison of dialysis and nondialysis days

INTRODUCTION

Hemodialysis (HD) induces several physiological changes that can affect plasma glucose levels in patients with diabetes and in turn their glycemic control. Studies using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to assess glucose variations on dialysis days compared with nondialysis days report conflicting results. Here, we used CGM to examine glucose variations induced by HD in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing maintenance HD were included. CGM (Ipro2®, Medtronic) was performed at baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, and 16 for up to 7 days at each visit. CGM profiles on days where participants received HD were compared with days without HD using a linear mixed model.

FINDINGS

Twenty-seven patients were included. The median number of CGM days performed was 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 6-10) for dialysis days and 16 (IQR 12-17) for nondialysis days. The median sensor glucose was 9.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.8-10.2) mmol/L on dialysis days compared with 9.5 (95% CI 8.9-10.2) mmol/L on nondialysis days (p = 0.58). Nocturnal mean sensor glucose was higher on dialysis days compared with nondialysis days: 8.8 (95% CI 8.0-9.6) mmol/L versus 8.4 (95% CI 7.7-9.2) mmol/L (p = 0.029).

DISCUSSION

Similar median sensor glucose values were found for days on and off HD. Nocturnal glucose levels were modestly increased on dialysis days. Our findings indicate that antidiabetic treatment does not need to be differentiated on dialysis versus nondialysis days in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing maintenance HD.

Novel clinical relationships between time in range and microangiopathies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus on hemodialysis

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

We investigated associations among glucose time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL), glycemic markers and prevalence of diabetic microangiopathy in people with diabetes undergoing hemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

A total of 107 people with type 2 diabetes undergoing HD (HbA_1c 6.4 %; glycated albumin [GA] 20.6 %) using continuous glucose monitoring were analyzed in this observational and cross-sectional study.

RESULTS

HbA_1c and GA levels significantly negatively correlated with TIR, and positively correlated with time rate of hyperglycemia, but not with time rate of hypoglycemia. TIR of 70 % corresponded to HbA_1c of 6.5 % and GA of 21.2 %. The estimated HbA_1c level corresponding to TIR of 70 % in this study was lower than that previously reported in people with diabetes without HD. The prevalence of diabetic neuropathy was not significantly different between people with TIR ≥ 70 % and those with TIR < 70 % (P = 0.1925), but the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in people with TIR ≥ 70 % was significantly lower than in those with TIR < 70 % (P = 0.0071).

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

TIR correlated with HbA_1c and GA levels in people with type 2 diabetes on HD. Additionally, a higher TIR resulted in a lower rate of diabetic retinopathy.

RESEARCH IN CONTEXT

What is already known about this subject? What is the key question? What are the new findings? How might this impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?

Hemodialysis-Related Glycemic Disarray Proven by Continuous Glucose Monitoring; Glycemic Markers and Hypoglycemia

OBJECTIVE

There is a high risk of asymptomatic hypoglycemia associated with hemodialysis (HD) using glucose-free dialysate; therefore, the inclusion of glucose in the dialysate is believed to prevent intradialytic hypoglycemia. However, the exact glycemic fluctuation profiles and frequency of asymptomatic hypoglycemia using dialysates containing >100 mg/dL glucose have not been determined.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We evaluated the glycemic profiles of 98 patients, 68 of whom were men, with type 2 diabetes undergoing HD (HbA_1c 6.4 ± 1.2%; glycated albumin 20.8 ± 6.8%) with a dialysate containing 100, 125, or 150 mg/dL glucose using continuous glucose monitoring.

RESULTS

Sensor glucose level (SGL) showed a sustained decrease during HD, irrespective of the dialysate glucose concentration, and reached a nadir that was lower than the dialysate glucose concentration in 49 participants (50%). Twenty-one participants (21%) presented with HD-related hypoglycemia, defined by an SGL <70 mg/dL during HD and/or between the end of HD and their next meal. All these hypoglycemic episodes were asymptomatic. Measures of glycemic variability calculated using the SGL data (SD, coefficient of variation, and range of SGL) were higher and time below range (<70 mg/dL) was lower in participants who experienced HD-related hypoglycemia than in those who did not, whereas time in range between 70 and 180 mg/dL, time above range (>180 mg/dL), HbA_1c, and glycated albumin of the two groups were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the use of dialysate containing 100-150 mg/dL glucose, patients with diabetes undergoing HD experienced HD-related hypoglycemia unawareness frequently. SGL may fall well below the dialysate glucose concentration toward the end of HD.

Glucose tolerance in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus during hemodialysis

AIMS

The disposal of a glucose bolus was studied to identify glucose metabolism in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) during their regular hemodialysis (HD) treatment.

METHODS

Plasma glucose, insulin, and c-peptide concentrations were measured during a 60 min observation phase following a rapid glucose infusion (0.5 g/kg dry weight). Glucose disposition and elimination rates were determined from kinetic analysis, and insulinogenic index was calculated. Insulin resistance (R_HOMA) was determined by homeostatic model assessment (HOMA).

RESULTS

35 HD patients (14 with T2DM) distinguished by a higher age (median: 70 vs. 55 y, p < 0.01) in T2DM patients were studied. Glucose kinetic data showed only small differences between patients with or without T2DM, but as R_HOMA measured in all patients increased, a larger fraction of glucose was removed by the extracorporeal system (r = 0.430, p = 0.01). One hour after glucose bolus injection the glucose level was not different from that before HD also in patients with T2DM (p = 0.115).

CONCLUSIONS

The larger glucose amount recovered in dialysate in patients with increasing R_HOMA indicates that impaired glucose disposal could be measured during HD using a non-invasive dialysis quantification approach without blood sampling. Glucose infusion during HD is safe also in patients with T2DM.

When ESKD complicates the management of diabetes mellitus

Given the increased incidence and prevalence of ESKD (end-stage kidney disease) attributed to diabetes mellitus, it is important to consider the physiological and global sociodemographic factors that give rise to unique challenges in providing excellent care to this population. The individual with diabetes and ESKD faces alterations of glucose homeostasis that require close therapeutic attention, as well as the consideration of safe and effective means of maintaining glycemic control. Implementation of routine monitoring of blood glucose and thoughtful alteration of the individual's hypoglycemic drug regimen must be employed to reduce the risk of neurological, cardiovascular, and diabetes-specific complications that may arise as a result of ESKD. Titration of insulin therapy may become quite challenging, as kidney replacement therapy often significantly impacts insulin requirements. New medications have significantly improved the ability of the clinician to provide effective therapies for the management of diabetes, but have also raised an equal amount of uncertainty with respect to their safety and efficacy in the ESKD population. Additionally, the clinician must consider the challenges related to the delivery of kidney replacement therapy, and how inter-modality differences may impact glycemic control, diabetes, and ESKD-related complications, and issues surrounding dialysis vascular access creation.

Epidemiology and outcomes of hypoglycemia in patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease on dialysis: A national cohort study

Background

Patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease (DKD) behave differently to diabetic patients without kidney disease. We aimed to investigate the associations of hypoglycemia and outcomes after initiation of dialysis in patients with advanced DKD on dialysis.

Methods

Using National Health Insurance Research Database, 20,845 advanced DKD patients beginning long-term dialysis between 2002 and 2006 were enrolled. We investigated the incidence of severe hypoglycemia episodes before initiation of dialysis. Patients were followed from date of first dialysis to death, end of dialysis, or 2008. Main outcomes measured were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and subsequent severe hypoglycemic episodes after dialysis.

Results

19.18% patients had at least one hypoglycemia episode during 1-year period before initiation of dialysis. Advanced DKD patients with higher adapted Diabetes Complications Severity Index (aDCSI) scores were associated with more frequent hypoglycemia (P for trend < 0.001). Mortality and subsequent severe hypoglycemia after dialysis both increased with number of hypoglycemic episodes. Compared to those who had no hypoglycemic episodes, those who had one had a 15% higher risk of death and a 2.3-fold higher risk of subsequent severe hypoglycemia. Those with two or more episodes had a 19% higher risk of death and a 3.9-fold higher risk of subsequent severe hypoglycemia. However, previous severe hypoglycemia was not correlated with risk of MI after dialysis.

Conclusions

The rate of severe hypoglycemia was high in advanced DKD patients. Patients with higher aDCSI scores tended to have more hypoglycemic episodes. Hypoglycemic episodes were associated with subsequent hypoglycemia and mortality after initiation of dialysis. We studied the associations and further study is needed to establish cause. In addition, more attention is needed for hypoglycemia prevention in advanced DKD patients, especially for those at risk patients.

Optimizing haemodialysate composition

Survival and quality of life of dialysis patients are strictly dependent on the quality of the haemodialysis (HD) treatment. In this respect, dialysate composition, including water purity, plays a crucial role. A major aim of HD is to normalize predialysis plasma electrolyte and mineral concentrations, while minimizing wide swings in the patient's intradialytic plasma concentrations. Adequate sodium (Na) and water removal is critical for preventing intra- and interdialytic hypotension and pulmonary edema. Avoiding both hyper- and hypokalaemia prevents life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Optimal calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) dialysate concentrations may protect the cardiovascular system and the bones, preventing extraskeletal calcifications, severe secondary hyperparathyroidism and adynamic bone disease. Adequate bicarbonate concentration [HCO₃⁻] maintains a stable pH in the body fluids for appropriate protein and membrane functioning and also protects the bones. An adequate dialysate glucose concentration prevents severe hyperglycaemia and life-threating hypoglycaemia, which can lead to severe cardiovascular complications and a worsening of diabetic comorbidities.

Association of Predialysis Calculated Plasma Osmolarity With Intradialytic Blood Pressure Decline

BACKGROUND

The rapid reduction in plasma osmolality during hemodialysis (HD) may induce temporary gradients that promote the movement of water from the extracellular to the intracellular compartment, predisposing to the development of intradialytic hypotension (IDH).

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

3,142 prevalent patients receiving thrice-weekly HD from a single dialysis provider organization.

PREDICTOR

Predialysis calculated plasma osmolarity (calculated after the 2-day interval as 2 × serum sodium + serum urea nitrogen/2.8 + serum glucose/18).

OUTCOME

Magnitude of systolic blood pressure (SBP) decline (predialysis SBP - nadir intradialytic SBP) and risk of IDH (SBP decline > 35 or nadir SBP < 90 mm Hg).

MEASUREMENTS

Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted generalized linear models were fit to estimate the association of calculated osmolarity with intradialytic SBP decline and the odds of developing IDH.

RESULTS

Mean age of participants was 62.6±15.2 (SD) years, 57.1% were men, and 61.0% had diabetes. Mean predialysis calculated osmolarity during follow-up was 306.4 ± 9.5 mOsm/L. After case-mix adjustment, each 10-mOsm/L increase in predialysis calculated osmolarity was associated with 1.48 (95% CI, 0.86-2.09) mm Hg (P < 0.001) greater decline in intradialytic SBP and 10% greater odds of IDH (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15). In adjusted models, lower predialysis sodium and higher serum urea nitrogen and serum glucose levels were associated with greater decline in intradialytic SBP.

LIMITATIONS

Measured serum osmolality, timing of changes in intradialytic osmolality, dialysate osmolality, and dialysate temperature were not available.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher predialysis calculated osmolarity is associated with greater decline in intradialytic SBP and greater risk of IDH in maintenance HD patients. Strategies to minimize rapid shifts in osmolality should be tested prospectively to minimize excess SBP decline in susceptible patients.

Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia and glycaemic disarrays

In patients with diabetes receiving chronic haemodialysis, both very high and low glucose levels are associated with poor outcomes, including mortality. Conditions that are associated with an increased risk of hypoglycaemia in these patients include decreased gluconeogenesis in the remnant kidneys, deranged metabolic pathways, inadequate nutrition, decreased insulin clearance, glucose loss to the dialysate and diffusion of glucose into erythrocytes during haemodialysis. Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia is common during treatments with glucose-free dialysate, which engenders a catabolic status similar to fasting; this state can also occur with 5.55 mmol/l glucose-containing dialysate. Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia occurs more frequently in patients with diabetes than in those without. Insulin therapy and oral hypoglycaemic agents should, therefore, be used with caution in patients on dialysis. Several hours after completion of haemodialysis treatment a paradoxical rebound hyperglycaemia may occur via a similar mechanism as the Somogyi effect, together with insulin resistance. Appropriate glycaemic control tailored for patients on haemodialysis is needed to avoid haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia and other glycaemic disarrays. In this Review we summarize the pathophysiology and current management of glycaemic disarrays in patients on haemodialysis.

Risk of hypoglycemia during hemodialysis in diabetic patients is related to lower pre-dialysis glycemia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the occurrence of hypoglycemia during hemodialysis in chronic kidney disease diabetic patients who present different levels of pre-dialysis glycemia both when using dialysis solutions with and without glucose.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty type 2 diabetic patients in maintenance hemodialysis were submitted to three dialysis sessions (at a 7-day interval each) with dialysis solutions without glucose, with glucose at 55 mg/dL, and at 90 mg/dL subsequently. Blood glucose levels were measured immediately pre-dialysis and at 4 moments during the session, and values under 70 mg/dL were considered as hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

Average pre-dialysis glycemia was lower in those who presented intra-dialytic hypoglycemia than in those who did not, both in glucose-free (140.4 ± 50.7 vs. 277.7 ± 91.0 mg/dL; p = 0.005; 95%CI: 46.4 to 228.1) and in glucose 55 mg/dL (89.5 ± 10.6 vs. 229.7 ± 105.0 mg/dL; p < 0.05; 95%CI: 9.8 to 270.5). In patients with pre-dialysis glycemia under 140 mg/dL, average intradialytic glycemia was significantly lower than pre-dialysis glycemia only when using glucose-free dialysate (p < 0.0001; 95%CI: 29.9 to 56.0 - t-test). Hypoglycemia during dialysis was observed only when using glucose-free or glucose-poor dialysis solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of glucose-free or glucose-poor dialysis solution presents a high risk of intradialytic hypoglycemia in diabetic renal patients, especially in those with presumed better glycemic control.

Diets and enteral supplements for improving outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011;7:369-384. [PMID: 21629229 DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.60]

Protein-energy wasting (PEW), which is manifested by low serum levels of albumin or prealbumin, sarcopenia and weight loss, is one of the strongest predictors of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although PEW might be engendered by non-nutritional conditions, such as inflammation or other comorbidities, the question of causality does not refute the effectiveness of dietary interventions and nutritional support in improving outcomes in patients with CKD. The literature indicates that PEW can be mitigated or corrected with an appropriate diet and enteral nutritional support that targets dietary protein intake. In-center meals or oral supplements provided during dialysis therapy are feasible and inexpensive interventions that might improve survival and quality of life in patients with CKD. Dietary requirements and enteral nutritional support must also be considered in patients with CKD and diabetes mellitus, in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, renal transplant recipients, and in children with CKD. Adjunctive pharmacological therapies, such as appetite stimulants, anabolic hormones, and antioxidative or anti-inflammatory agents, might augment dietary interventions. Intraperitoneal or intradialytic parenteral nutrition should be considered for patients with PEW whenever enteral interventions are not possible or are ineffective. Controlled trials are needed to better assess the effectiveness of in-center meals and oral supplements.

Glucose in the dialysate: historical perspective and possible implications?

Hemodialysate solutions often contain high concentrations of glucose (up to 200 mg/dL). The historical reasons for the addition of glucose to the dialysate included: (1) aid in performance of ultrafiltration and (2) minimization of nutritional (caloric) losses during dialysis. However, recent experimental evidence supports the fact that exposure to high levels of glucose may be pro-inflammatory. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with dialysis and its linkage to chronic inflammation, the routine use of glucose in the dialysate may warrant reexamination. This review examines the utility of glucose in the dialysate and discusses the potential implications on chronic inflammation in patients with end-stage renal disease. While there is currently no evidence for a casual relationship between dialysate glucose concentration and the chronic inflammation seen in ESRD, this possibility is explored.

Insulin therapy in renal disease

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the main cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Conversely, chronic renal failure (CRF) is also associated with diverse alterations in carbohydrate and insulin metabolism. CRF-induced metabolic disorders should be borne in mind when treating diabetic patients, to ensure the introduction of adequate therapy adjustments that are in line with the onset of renal function decline. Moreover, several specific therapies employed in CRF may also influence pharmacological therapy of DM in uraemic patients. Adequate glycaemic control has also been associated with a reduction in the onset and progression of diabetic nephropathy as well as in the morbidity and mortality in uraemic diabetic patients during dialysis. Intensive insulin therapy can notably improve glycemic control and it should be considered part of the management of insulin-treated CRF diabetic patients. Insulin analogues have been recently evaluated in CRF diabetic patients, with encouraging results. In this study, we review the more relevant aspects related to insulin therapy in diabetic patients with different degrees of renal failure and in patients with ESRD, both in conservative therapy and dialysis.

Plasma Insulin is Removed by Hemodialysis: Evaluation of the Relation Between Plasma Insulin and Glucose by Using a Dialysate With or Without Glucose

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the alteration in plasma immunoreactive insulin (IRI) and glucose concentrations due to hemodialysis (HD) treatment by using a dialysate with or without glucose in HD patients. We divided the patients into three groups: non-diabetic patients (n-DM group), well-controlled diabetic patients (HbA(1c) <7.0% [w-DM group]), and poorly-controlled diabetic patients (HbA(1c) > or = 7.0% [p-DM group]). Using a dialysate with a glucose concentration of 100 mg/dL (glu(+)-dialysate) and a glucose-free dialysate (glu(-)-dialysate), we studied the daily profiles of plasma glucose in the three groups. We measured the levels of plasma glucose and IRI at three time points (predialysis and 2 h and 4 h after the initiation of dialysis) at pre(A) and postdialyzer (V) sites in HD patients. There was a significant increase in the daily profiles of the plasma glucose level from the time before dinner until bedtime in both the w-DM and p-DM groups, when comparing the values on an HD day with those on a non-HD day. In the p-DM group, the use of the glu(-)-dialysate resulted in a significant hyperglycemia in the evening hours when compared with the use of the glu(+)-dialysate. In the DM group, the use of the glu(+)-dialysate resulted in a significant decrease in the plasma glucose and IRI levels during HD. However, in the n-DM group, there was no difference in the plasma glucose levels during HD. On the other hand, the use of a glucose-free dialysate led to a significant decrease in the plasma glucose and IRI levels during HD in all groups. The plasma IRI levels decreased significantly between the A and V sites at each point in all groups irrespective of the glucose concentration of the dialysate. The present study confirmed that the concentration of not only glucose but also IRI had decreased during the passage of the plasma through the dialyzer. In HD patients with diabetes, the glucose content of the hemodialysis solution plays an important role in preventing acute hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia on HD days.