Granulocyte Elastase, β-Thromboglobulin, and C3D during Acetate or Bicarbonate Hemodialysis with Hemophan® Compared to a Cellulose Acetate Membrane

Twenty-two patients were dialysed in a cross-over design using Hemophan® or cellulose acetate membranes. The dialysate buffer was acetate (n = 12) or bicarbonate (n = 10). Blood was sampled at 0, 15, 60 and 180 min and mean values were adjusted for changes in total protein in each sample. At 15 min during dialysis a decrease in leukocytes and platelets occurred with both membranes, irrespective of the buffer (Wilcoxon, p < 0.006). During dialysis, increases were found in granulocyte elastase inhibitor complex (E-α1-PI), β-thromboglobulin and C3d. β2-microgrobulin was not significantly changed in blood after dialysis with Hemophan® or cellulose acetate membranes with bicarbonate buffer. Side effects were more pronounced at 180 min during dialysis with bicarbonate in patients using cellulose acetate than with Hemophan® (p = 0.021, n = 8). Hemophan® seemed to be more favourable than cellulose acetate membranes in regard to leukopenia and E- α1-PI. The dialysate buffer may also alter membrane biocompatibility.

The Effect of Hemodialysis and Dialyzer Biocompatibility on Erythrocyte Glutathione-Defense System in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

Background

Uremic patients, especially those receiving regular hemodialysis (HD) treatment, are at high risk of oxidative damage by noxious free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS). The erythrocyte glutathione-defense system (GSH-DS) is one of the major enzymatic means of scavenging and detoxifying ROS. This study aimed to elucidate the effect of HD and dialyzer biocompatibility on erythrocyte GSH-DS in uremic patients on maintenance HD treatment.

Methods

Twenty-five healthy volunteers and 42 HD patients were enrolled in this study. Blood samples were drawn immediately before and after HD session, and erythrocyte glutathione (GSH) level as well as the activities of the enzymes glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), glutathione reductase (GSSG-Rd), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) were measured. To evaluate the effect of dialyzer type on the studied parameters the patients were were subdivided into two groups: those who had dialysis with cuprophane (CU) membranes (n=23) and those who received dialysis with the aid of polysulfone (PS) membranes (n=19).

Results

The activities of G6PD and GSH-Px as well as GSH level were significantly decreased in HD patients as compared with controls. On the other hand, the activities of GSSG-Rd and GST were significantly elevated among HD patients in comparison with control values. A single HD session, regardless of the type of dialyzer, did not induce any significant effect on any of the measured parameters, although G6PD activity increased significantly after dialysis. CU membrane did not result in any change in GSH or its metabolizing enzymes, while PS dialyzers exerted a minor but significant restoration in GSH-DS.

Conclusion

The antioxidant pool, as represented by GSH-DS, is significantly affected by dialyzer type in HD patients being significantly corrected with polysulfone dialyzer.

Beta-2 microglobulin in ESRD: an in-depth review

Beta-2 microglobulin is the most widely studied low-molecular-weight protein in end-stage renal disease. It is known to cause dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), by virtue of its retention when renal function fails, its deposition in tissues, its aggregation into fibrils, and its ability to become glycosylated. The onset of DRA may be protracted by the use of noncellulosic membranes, especially when high-volume hemodiafiltration is used in the treatment of renal failure. Adsorptive methods have been developed to improve the removal of beta-2 microglobulin. There seems to be a relative risk reduction in mortality when patients are treated with dialysis membranes that have a higher clearance of beta-2 microglobulin.