Multi-purpose silastic dual-lumen central venous catheters for both collection and transplantation of hematopoietic progenitor cells

Autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation frequently requires sequential placement and use of two separate central venous catheters: (1) a short-term, large-bore, stiff device inserted for leukapheresis, and after removal of that device, (2) a long-term, multi-lumen, flexible, Silastic catheter for administration of high-dose chemotherapy, re-infusion of hematopoietic cells, and intensive supportive care. We reviewed our recent experience with two dual-lumen, large-bore, Silastic multi-purpose ('hybrid') catheters, each of which can be used as a single device for both leukapheresis and long-term supportive care throughout the transplant process. Quinton-Raaf PermCath and Bard-Hickman hemodialysis/apheresis dual-lumen catheters were used as the sole venous access device in 112 consecutive patients who underwent autologous PBPC collection and transplantation. The catheter exit site was monitored three times a week, and lumen patency was assessed using clinical and radiologic techniques. Catheters were removed prematurely for persistent thrombus, positive blood cultures despite appropriate antibiotics, or mechanical dysfunction. There were no intra-operative or immediate post-operative complications relating to insertion. Thirty-two patients experienced catheter occlusion necessitating urokinase instillation. Persistent occlusive problems were noted in 16 patients, and in 10 patients the catheter had to be removed. Two exit site infections and 17 bacteremias occurred. Catheters had to be removed for persistent infection in two subjects and for mechanical problems in five others. Cost analysis comparing the hybrid catheters alone vs conventional devices revealed a charge of $4230 in patients with hybrid catheters vs. $7530 in those requiring a temporary non-Silastic dialysis catheter in addition to a flexible, long-term Silastic catheter. Hybrid, Silastic, dual-lumen, large-bore central venous catheters are safe, cost-effective and convenient multi-purpose venous access devices that may be used in the setting of autologous PBPC collection and transplantation. The rate of thrombotic, infectious and mechanical complications appears comparable to other central venous access devices.

Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal (stromal) progenitor cells (MPCs) cannot be recovered from peripheral blood progenitor cell collections

The purpose of this study was to compare the ability to collect human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal (stromal) progenitor cells (MPC) from bone marrow versus peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell (PBPC) collections using in vitro and in vivo assays. Ten milliliter samples of PBPC collections mobilized from 11 patients undergoing autotransplants using chemotherapy followed by G-CSF 5-10 micrograms/kg were evaluated using in vitro and in vivo assays for hematopoietic progenitors and MPCs. Additionally, 10 ml samples of unstimulated bone marrow aspirates as well as PBPC collected after mobilization using G-CSF 10 micrograms/kg obtained from 3 normal, histocompatible allogeneic donors were analyzed for hematopoietic progenitors and MPCs. The MPCs were isolated and culture-expanded as adherent cells in vitro and subsequently tested for the capacity to differentiate into mesenchymal phenotypes in vivo using calcium hydroxyapatite porous ceramic cubes implanted s.c. in athymic mice. Demineralized sections of these cubes were analyzed histologically for the appearance of bone and cartilage. Seven autotransplant subjects with cancer received G-CSF after chemotherapy administration, whereas 4 cancer patients and all 3 normal donors received G-CSF alone as the mobilizing regimen. For the autologous PBPC collections and the normal marrow aspirations, median hematopoietic progenitor content was in the normal range for our institution. MPCs were detected in in vitro cultures and as bone-positive ceramic cubes in samples of all 3 allogeneic donor bone marrows but in none of the 14 autologous and 6 allogeneic PBPC collections. In conclusion, MPCs could not be recovered in PBPC collections obtained from either normal donors or patients who underwent PBPC collections after mobilization therapy but could be obtained routinely from bone marrow samples. Although the role of transplanted MPCs is an area of clinical investigation, this study points out a fundamental differences in the population of cells transplanted after collection from bone marrow versus peripheral blood.

Recombinant cytokines and hematopoietic growth factors in allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation

Use of recombinant hematopoietic growth factors in the course of bone marrow transplantation has revolutionized this modality by significantly improving the safety of the procedure. It is anticipated that use of cytokines in combination and the introduction of newer agents will further reduce costs and improve antitumor responses as well.

Microbiologic contamination of peripheral blood progenitor cells collected for hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) rather than bone marrow are used increasingly to provide hematologic reconstitution when transfused after marrow-ablative chemotherapy. PBPCs often are collected via central venous catheters that have remained in place for long periods of time and that may become infected.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The investigators reviewed their 5-year experience in collecting PBPCs for the prevalence of bacterial contamination. Except for cotrimoxazole therapy given to prevent Pneumocystis cariini pneumonia, patients were not given antibiotic prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Each patient underwent a median of 7 (range, 2-21) PBPC collections; 0.2 percent (3/1040 collections) were culture positive for bacteria (two collections contained coagulase-negative staphylococci and one contained Serratia marcescens). All culture-positive collections were discarded; no PBPCs were culture positive at the time of thawing and transfusion.

CONCLUSION

This contamination rate is below that previously reported for bone marrow harvests and platelet concentrate collections. Obtaining PBPCs through large-bore central venous catheters has not added to the risk of infection in transplant patients. A program of screening in vitro cultures and strict adherence to sterility techniques can result in very low microbiologic contamination and thus obviates the need for prophylactic antimicrobials in the PBPCs and in the patient.

Thrombocytopenia after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: an unresolved problem and possible approaches to resolve it

Prolonged thrombocytopenia is a frequent clinical problem in cancer patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation. The use of GM-CSF as an adjuvant to autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) has significantly reduced the duration of neutropenia after high-dose chemotherapy but failed to accelerate platelet recovery in transplanted patients. The more rapid hematopoietic reconstitution obtained by autologous mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) after high-dose chemotherapy has resulted in its increasing use instead of ABMT. However, PBPCT does not always produce faster platelet engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy, and persistent thrombocytopenia remains a significant clinical problem in PBPC-transplanted patients. The duration of severe thrombocytopenia (requiring frequent platelet transfusions) until platelet recovery varies widely depending on the quality of the autograft and previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The median days to reach 20,000/microliters platelets ranged from 10 to 32 days. Pilot clinical studies in which cancer patients were transplanted with enriched CD34+ cell autografts, obtained from G-CSF-mobilized PB, showed a similar platelet recovery after high-dose chemotherapy but also wide variation among the patients. The median days to reach 20,000/microliters platelets ranged from 9 to 38 days. The dose of CFU-GM in the autograft has been identified as the best predictive factor for hematopoietic recovery (p < 0.0001) after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous PBPCT in 118 patients with hematologic malignancies. A similar assessment of the megakaryocyte progenitor cells (BFU-MK and CFU-MK) in the autograft not only could predict time to platelet recovery but also could help to optimize the number and method of mobilization of the PBPC required to shorten the problematic obligatory 2-week duration of thrombocytopenia after high-dose chemotherapy. A routine assessment of the number of BFU-MK and CFU-MK present in each autograft and correlation with platelet recovery after transplantation would enable us to define the clinical threshold cell dose required for rapid platelet recovery. Recently, several non-specific cytokines with thrombopoietic activity have been evaluated in phase I clinical trials, including interleukin-1, interleukin-3 followed by GM-CSF, interleukin-6, and interleukin-11 in cancer patients, showing an encouraging trend toward a decrease in thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy. The recently cloned specific platelet cytokine, thrombopoietin, is currently undergoing phase I clinical studies, and the results are awaited with interest.

Patterns of recovery phase infection after autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with malignancies. The Gruppo Italiano di Studio per la Manipolazione Cellulare in Ematologia

Recovery phase infection patterns in 55 patients who had undergone autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation (ABPCT) were evaluated retrospectively. The results were compared to those obtained in a group of 41 patients who received autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Fever related to documented or suspected infection developed in 38 of 55 patients in the ABPCT group and in 37 of 41 in the ABMT group (p < 0.05). The percentages of patients with positive blood cultures did not differ significantly (ABPCT, 8/55 vs. ABMT, 8/41, p > 0.05). However, fewer acquired systemic fungal infections (1/55 vs. 5/41, p < 0.05) as well as fewer days of antibiotic usage were observed in the ABPCT group.