1
|
Russell C, Ashley J, Ali F, Bozinoff N, Corace K, Marsh DC, Mushquash C, Wyman J, Zhang M, Lange S. Examining inequities in access to opioid agonist treatment (OAT) take-home doses (THD): A Canadian OAT guideline synthesis and systematic review. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 127:104343. [PMID: 38554565 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Daily supervised Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) medication has been identified as a barrier to treatment retention. Canadian OAT guidelines outline take-home dose (THD) criteria, yet, OAT prescribers use their clinical judgement to decide whether an individual is 'clinically stable' to receive THD. There is limited information regarding whether these decisions may result in inequitable access to THD, including in the context of updated COVID-19 guidance. The current Canadian OAT THD guideline synthesis and systematic review aimed to address this knowledge gap. METHODS This systematic review included a two-pronged approach. First, we searched available academic literature in Embase, Medline, and PsychINFO up until October 12th, 2022, to identify studies that compared characteristics of individuals on OAT who had and had not been granted access to THD to explore potential inequities in access. Next, we identified all Canadian national and provincial OAT guidelines through a semi-structured grey literature search (conducted between September-October 2022) and extracted all THD 'stability' and allowances/timeline criteria to compare against characteristics identified in the literature search. Data from both review arms were synthesized and narratively presented. RESULTS A total of n = 56 guidelines and n = 7 academic studies were included. The systematic review identified a number of patient characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, housing, employment, neighborhood income, drug use, mental health, health service utilization, as well as treatment duration that were associated with differential access to THD. The Canadian OAT THD guideline synthesis identified many of these same characteristics as 'stability' criteria, underscoring the potential for Canadian OAT guidelines to result in inequitable access to THD. CONCLUSIONS This two-pronged literature review demonstrated that current guidelines likely contribute to inequitable OAT THD access due primarily to inconsistent 'stability' criteria across guidelines. More research is needed to understand differential OAT THD access with a focus on prescriber decision-making and evaluating associated treatment and safety outcomes. The development of a client-centered, equity-focused, and evidence-informed decision making framework that incorporates more clear definitions of 'stability' criteria and indications for prescriber discretion is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cayley Russell
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada, M5S 2S1; Ontario Node, Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada, M5S 2S1; Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Circle, Room 2374, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1A8.
| | - Jenna Ashley
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada, M5S 2S1
| | - Farihah Ali
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada, M5S 2S1; Ontario Node, Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada, M5S 2S1
| | - Nikki Bozinoff
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1R8; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, 5th floor, Toronto, Canada, M5G1V7
| | - Kim Corace
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Roger Guindon Hall, 451 Smyth Rd #2044, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8M5; Substance Use and Concurrent Disorders Program, The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Center, 1145 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Z 7K4; University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research, The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Center, 1145 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Z 7K4
| | - David C Marsh
- NOSM University, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, P3E 2C6; ICES North, 56 Walford Road, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, P3E 2H3; Health Science North Research Institute, 56 Walford Road, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, P3E 2H3
| | - Christopher Mushquash
- Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
| | - Jennifer Wyman
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, 5th floor, Toronto, Canada, M5G1V7; Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Maria Zhang
- Pharmacy Services, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6J 1H4; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, Canada, M5S 3M2
| | - Shannon Lange
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada, M5S 2S1; Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Circle, Room 2374, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1A8; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1R8; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, 8th floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1R8
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wolfson-Stofko B, Hirode G, Vanderhoff A, Karkada J, Capraru C, Biondi MJ, Hansen B, Shah H, Janssen HLA, Feld JJ. Real-world hepatitis C prevalence and treatment uptake at opioid agonist therapy clinics in Ontario, Canada. J Viral Hepat 2024; 31:240-247. [PMID: 38385850 DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Widespread screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is necessary for Canada to meet its HCV elimination goals by 2030. People who currently or previously injected drugs are at high risk for HCV. Opioid agonist therapy (OAT, such as methadone and buprenorphine) has been shown to help stabilize the lives of people who are opioid-dependent. The distribution of OAT in North America typically requires daily, weekly, or monthly clinic visits and presents an opportunity for engagement, screening and treatment for those at high-risk of HCV. In this study, HCV screening was conducted by staff at OAT clinics in Ontario from 2016 to 2020 and those with chronic infections were treated on-site with direct-acting antivirals. Point-of-care or dried blood spot (DBS) testing was used for antibodies, DBS or serum for HCV RNA and serum for HCV RNA at SVR12 (sustained virological response). Clinics screened 1954 people (mean age 40 years ±12, 63% male). Forty-five percent were antibody positive, of whom 64% were HCV RNA+. Eighty percent of those RNA+ set an appointment in which 99% attended. Ninety-six percent started treatment with 87% completing treatment. Sixty-eight percent of people who completed treatment submitted a sample for SVR12 testing of which 97% achieved a virological cure. Results suggest that HCV screening and treatment at OAT clinics is feasible, effective and warrants expansion. Data suggest strong treatment adherence due to high rates of SVR12 comparable with other OAT-based HCV treatment programs. The lack of SVR12 sampling could be addressed by either on-site phlebotomy or incentivizing SVR12 sampling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Wolfson-Stofko
- Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN), Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research (CDUHR), College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - G Hirode
- Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN), Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Vanderhoff
- Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN), Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Karkada
- Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN), Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - C Capraru
- Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN), Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - M J Biondi
- Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN), Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B Hansen
- Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN), Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - H Shah
- Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN), Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - H L A Janssen
- Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN), Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J Feld
- Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN), Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guerra-Alejos BC, Yan Y, Kurz M, Mudalige N, Min JE, Homayra F, Nosyk B. Prescribing practices in opioid agonist treatment and changes in compliance to clinical dosing guidelines in British Columbia, Canada. Addiction 2024. [PMID: 38584294 DOI: 10.1111/add.16491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM In British Columbia, Canada, clinical guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorders (OUD) were updated in 2017, during a period in which the potency and composition of the illicit drug supply changed rapidly. We aimed to describe changes in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) prescribing practices at the population level in a setting in which fentanyl and its analogs have become the primary illicit opioid of use. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using three linked health administrative databases in British Columbia (BC), Canada. All individuals with at least one OAT dispensation in BC between 1 January 2014 and 31 August 2021 took part. MEASUREMENTS To assess changes in OAT prescribing practices over time, we calculated initiation doses, dose titration intervals, maintenance doses and take-home dosing intervals stratified by medication [methadone, buprenorphine-naloxone and slow-release oral morphine (SROM)] according to recommended guidelines. FINDINGS A total of 265 410 OAT episodes (57.5% on methadone, 34.5% on buprenorphine-naloxone and 8.0% on SROM) were initiated during the study period. Compared with the guideline recommendation, observed initiation doses were higher among all medications from 2014 (2017 for SROM) to 2021 (buprenorphine-naloxone: 14-29%; methadone: 53-66%; SROM: 26-55%). Titration intervals were shorter for all medications, consistent with guidelines for buprenorphine-naloxone (26-49%), but shorter than recommended for methadone or SROM (28-51% and 12-41%, respectively). Higher maintenance dosing was observed for methadone (68-78%) and SROM (3-21%). Take-home allowances extending beyond the recommended guideline length increased across medications (buprenorphine-naloxone: 18-35%; methadone: 50-64%; SROM: 34-39%). Changes in prescribing patterns were similar for first-time OAT initiators. CONCLUSION In British Columbia, Canada, from 2014 to 2021, prescribers of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) appeared to initiate both new and experienced OAT clients at higher doses than guideline recommendations, titrate them more rapidly and maintain clients at higher doses. Take-home dose allowances also gradually increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Youwei Yan
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Megan Kurz
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nishan Mudalige
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jeong Eun Min
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fahmida Homayra
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bohdan Nosyk
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mathias H, Jackson LA, Buxton JA, Dubé A, Kiepek N, Martin F, Martin P. What features of drug treatment programs help, or not, with access? a qualitative study of the perspectives of family members and community-based organization staff in Atlantic Canada. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2024; 19:20. [PMID: 38520017 PMCID: PMC10960477 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-024-00602-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Withdrawal management and opioid agonist treatment (OAT) programs help to reduce some of the harms experienced by people who use substances (PWUS). There is literature on how features of drug treatment programs (e.g., policies and practices) are helpful, or not helpful, to PWUS when seeking access to, or in, treatment. There is, however, relatively little literature based on the perspectives of family members/family of choice of PWUS and community-based organization staff within the context of Atlantic Canada. This paper explored the perspectives of these two groups on what was helpful, or not, about drug treatment programs in Atlantic Canada in terms of supporting access to, and retention in, treatment. METHODS One-on-one qualitative telephone interviews were conducted in 2020 with the two groups. Interviews focused on government-funded withdrawal management and OAT programs. Data were coded using a qualitative data management program (ATLAS.ti) and analyzed inductively for key themes/subthemes using grounded theory techniques. RESULTS Fifteen family members/family of choice and 16 community-based organization staff members participated (n = 31). Participants spoke about features of drug treatment programs in various places, and noted features that were perceived as helpful (e.g., quick access), as well as not helpful (e.g., wait times, programs located far from where PWUS live). Some participants provided their perceptions of how PWUS felt when seeking or accessing treatment. A number of participants reported taking various actions to help support access to treatment, including providing transportation to programs. A few participants also provided suggestions for change to help support access and retention such as better alignment of mental health and addiction systems. CONCLUSIONS Participants highlighted several helpful and not helpful features of drug treatment programs in terms of supporting treatment access and retention. Previous studies with PWUS and in other places have reported similar features, some of which (e.g., wait times) have been reported for many years. Changes are needed to reduce barriers to access and retention including the changes recommended by study participants. It is critical that the voices of key groups, (including PWUS) are heard to ensure treatment programs in all places support access and retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Mathias
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-300 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy 11405 87 AvenueEdmonton, T6G 1C9, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Lois A Jackson
- School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Stairs House, 6230 South Street, B3H 4R2, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jane A Buxton
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, V6T 1Z8, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anik Dubé
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Community Services, School of Nursing, Université de Moncton, 18, avenue Antonine-Maillet, E1A 3E9, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Niki Kiepek
- School of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Forrest Building, Room 215, 5869 University Avenue, B3H 4R2, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Fiona Martin
- Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Dalhousie University, Marion McCain Arts and Social Sciences Building, Room 1128, 6135 University Avenue, B3H 4R2, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Paula Martin
- Direction 180, 2151 Gottingen Street, B3K 3B5, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martin FS, Gosse M, Whelan E. 'Planning for a healthy baby and a healthy pregnancy': A critical analysis of Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid dependence during pregnancy. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2024; 46:514-533. [PMID: 37843508 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
As opioid fatalities rise in North America, the need to improve the supports available to those who are dependent on opioids and pregnant has become more urgent. This paper discusses the social organisation of drug treatment supports for those who are pregnant, using Canadian clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) as a case study. Pregnant patients are a priority population for MMT, both in Canada and internationally; the regulatory bodies that oversee MMT in Canada are the provincial Colleges of Physician and Surgeons and Health Canada. The paper analyses MMT CPGs published by these agencies, comparing their general recommendations to those specific to pregnant patients. We demonstrate that the guidelines address few treatment considerations for pregnant patients, other than improved birth outcomes and child welfare, despite acknowledging their more complex needs. Drawing on social science studies of gender and drugs, we argue that MMT CPGs therefore perpetuate the intensified surveillance and foetal prioritisation that have long generated barriers to care for opiate-dependent pregnant patients. We also discuss how and why the CPGs ultimately only reinforced these current limitations in the drug treatment sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona S Martin
- Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Meghan Gosse
- Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Emma Whelan
- Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Morin KA, Tatangelo M, Marsh D. Canadian Addiction Treatment Centre (CATC) opioid agonist treatment cohort in Ontario, Canada. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080790. [PMID: 38401902 PMCID: PMC10895228 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Canadian Addiction Treatment Centre (CATC) cohort was established during a period of increased provision of opioid agonist treatment (OAT), to study patient outcomes and trends related to the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) in Canada. The CATC cohort's strengths lie in its unique physician network, shared care model and event-level data, making it valuable for validation and integration studies. The CATC cohort is a valuable resource for examining OAT outcomes, providing insights into substance use trends and the impact of service-level factors. PARTICIPANTS The CATC cohort comprises 32 246 people who received OAT prescriptions between April 2014 and February 2021, with ongoing tri-annual updates planned until 2027. The cohort includes data from all CATC clinics' electronic medical records and includes demographic information and OAT clinical indicators. FINDINGS TO DATE This cohort profile describes the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients being treated in a large OAT physician network. As well, we report the longitudinal OAT retention by treatment type during a time of increasing exposure to a contaminated dangerous drug supply. Notable findings also include retention differences between methadone (32% of patients at 1 year) and buprenorphine (20% at 1 year). Previously published research from this cohort indicated that patient-level factors associated with retention include geographic location, concurrent substance use and prior treatment attempts. Service-level factors such as telemedicine delivery and frequency of urine drug screenings also influence retention. Additionally, the cohort identified rising OAT participation and a substantial increase in fentanyl use during the COVID-19 pandemic. FUTURE PLANS Future research objectives are the longitudinal evaluation of retention and flexible modelling techniques that account for the changes as patients are treated with OAT. Furthermore, future research aims are the use of conditional models, and linkage with provincial-level administrative datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen A Morin
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
- Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
- ICES North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Tatangelo
- Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
- ICES North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Marsh
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
- Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
- ICES North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Campbell C, Chiu K, Sud A. Methadone Prescribing Regulation for Opioid Use Disorder in Canada: Evidence for an East-West Policy Divide. Healthc Policy 2024; 19:49-61. [PMID: 38721734 PMCID: PMC11131095 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Opioid agonist therapy (OAT) is a key element in the response to opioid-related harms in Canada. In May 2018, Health Canada rescinded the requirement for obtaining a federal exemption for methadone prescribing. This comparative analysis examined provincial OAT policies and policy changes in response to this federal policy change. Policies and changes were regionalized; despite having lower rates of opioid-related harms, eastern provinces had looser regulatory regimes compared with western provinces, which became even looser after the federal policy change. Diverse knowledge and policy networks need to be fostered to bridge this east-west divide in substance use care policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Campbell
- Medical Student Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Kellia Chiu
- Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Family and Community Medicine Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Abhimanyu Sud
- Assistant Professor Department of Family and Community Medicine Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Research Chair Primary Care and Population Health Systems Humber River Health Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Krausz RM, Westenberg JN, Tai AM, Fadakar H, Seethapathy V, Mathew N, Azar P, Phillips A, Schütz CG, Choi F, Vogel M, Cabanis M, Meyer M, Jang K, Ignaszewski M. A Call for an Evidence-Based Strategy Against the Overdose Crisis. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2024; 69:5-9. [PMID: 37438926 PMCID: PMC10867411 DOI: 10.1177/07067437231188202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- R. Michael Krausz
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jean N Westenberg
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Clinic for Addiction Medicine, University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Andy M.Y. Tai
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hasti Fadakar
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Vijay Seethapathy
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Complex Pain and Addiction Services, Vancouver general Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nick Mathew
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Complex Pain and Addiction Services, Vancouver general Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Pouya Azar
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Complex Pain and Addiction Services, Vancouver general Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anthony Phillips
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Christian G Schütz
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fiona Choi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Marc Vogel
- Clinic for Addiction Medicine, University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maurice Cabanis
- Centre for Mental Health, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Maximilian Meyer
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Clinic for Addiction Medicine, University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kerry Jang
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Martha Ignaszewski
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Complex Pain and Addiction Services, Vancouver general Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Children's hospital, Children's and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meyer M, Westenberg JN, Jang KL, Choi F, Schreiter S, Mathew N, King C, Lang UE, Vogel M, Krausz RM. Shifting drug markets in North America - a global crisis in the making? Int J Ment Health Syst 2023; 17:36. [PMID: 37880722 PMCID: PMC10598952 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-023-00601-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding drug market dynamics and their underlying driving factors is paramount to developing effective responses to the overdose crisis in North America. This paper summarises the distinct drug market trends observed locally and internationally over the past decade to extrapolate future drug market trajectories. The emergence of fentanyl on North American street markets from 2014 onwards led to a shift of street drug use patterns. Previously perceived as contaminants, novel synthetic opioids became the drugs of choice and a trend towards higher potency was observed across various substance classes. The diversification of distribution strategies as well as the regionalisation and industrialisation of production followed basic economic principles that were heavily influenced by prosecution and policy makers. Particularly, the trend towards higher potency is likely most indicative of what to expect from future illicit drug market developments. Nitazenes and fentanyl-analogues, several times more potent than fentanyl itself, are increasingly detected in toxicological testing and have the potential of becoming the drugs of choice in the future. The dynamic of drug import and local production is less clear and influenced by a multitude of factors like precursor availability, know-how, infrastructure, and the success of local drug enforcement strategies. Drug market dynamics and the current trajectory towards ultrapotent opioids need to be recognised by legislation, enforcement, and the health care system to prepare effective responses. Without significant improvements in treatment access, the implementation of preventative approaches and early warning systems, the mortality rate will continue to increase. Furthermore, there is no mechanism in place preventing the currently North American focused overdose crisis to spread to other parts of the globe, particularly Europe. A system of oversight, research, and treatment is needed to address mortality rates of historic proportions and prevent further harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Meyer
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
- University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Jean N Westenberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Kerry L Jang
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Fiona Choi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Stefanie Schreiter
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nickie Mathew
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Conor King
- Victoria Police Department, Victoria, Canada
| | - Undine E Lang
- University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marc Vogel
- University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - R Michael Krausz
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tay Wee Teck J, Gittins R, Zlatkute G, Oteo Pérez A, Galea-Singer S, Baldacchino A. Developing a Theoretically Informed Implementation Model for Telemedicine-Delivered Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: Qualitative Study With Key Informants. JMIR Ment Health 2023; 10:e47186. [PMID: 37851506 PMCID: PMC10620637 DOI: 10.2196/47186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemedicine-delivered medication for opioid use disorder (TMOUD) has become more prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in North America. This is considered a positive development as TMOUD has the potential to increase access to evidence-based treatment for a population heavily affected by the opioid crisis and consequent rising mortality and morbidity rates in relation to opioid use disorder. Despite the increase in the use of TMOUD, there are no established service- and process-focused models to guide the implementation of this intervention. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop a process- and service-focused implementation model in collaboration with key stakeholders and bring together peer-reviewed literature, practice-based knowledge, and expert opinions. METHODS The simple rules for evidence translation in complex systems framework was applied to guide the development of a 6-step qualitative study. The steps were definition of the scope and objectives of the model, identification of evidence, stakeholder engagement, draft model development, key informant consultation, and final model specification. RESULTS The final specification for the TMOUD implementation model incorporated key strategic priorities, service delivery prerequisites, service design elements, stakeholder identification and engagement, key process domains, and iterative cycles of evaluation and improvement. CONCLUSIONS Through stakeholder engagement and key informant consultation, we produced a process- and service-focused TMOUD implementation model. The model is modifiable to different contexts and settings while also in keeping with the current evidence base and national and international standards of high-quality opioid use disorder care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Tay Wee Teck
- Digital Health Interventions in Addiction Services Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
| | | | - Giedre Zlatkute
- Digital Health Interventions in Addiction Services Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - Alberto Oteo Pérez
- Digital Health Interventions in Addiction Services Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexander Baldacchino
- Digital Health Interventions in Addiction Services Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sud A, Chiu K, Friedman J, Dupouy J. Buprenorphine deregulation as an opioid crisis policy response - A comparative analysis between France and the United States. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 120:104161. [PMID: 37619440 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In passing the Maintstreaming Addiction Treatment Act, the United States has abolished its federal X waiver, considered a major barrier to the wider buprenorphine prescribing needed to respond to opioid-related harms. Advocates for this policy have drawn on the French response of deregulating buprenorphine prescribing to address increasing overdose mortality around the turn of the millennium. So far, such policy advocacy has incompletely accounted for contextual and health system differences between the two countries. METHODS Using the health system dynamics framework, this analysis compares France from 1995 to 2003 (the relevant period of buprenorphine reform) to the US from 2018 until today (the comparison period to explore potential impacts of reform). We used it to guide examination of a) contextual issues relating to opioid use epidemiology and b) health system factors including prescriber supply, sector organization, and insurance coverage for primary care to draw relevant policy learning for the contemporary US. RESULTS We identified that the US had a 22.5-fold higher mortality rate and a 2.3-fold higher opioid use disorder (OUD) rate compared to France, despite having rates of prescribed buprenorphine per-capita higher than, and per-person with OUD comparable to, than that of France. These wide gulfs between the scales and nature of the problems between France and the US suggest that relaxing restrictions on buprenorphine prescribing through abolishing the X waiver will be insufficient for achieving hoped-for reductions in overdose mortality. CONCLUSION Health system strengthening with a focus on improvements in primary care prescriber supply, coverage, and coordination are likely higher yield policy complements to relaxing buprenorphine regulation. Such an approach would better prepare the US to adapt to ongoing dynamics and uncertainties in the opioid crisis and to optimize the already relatively high levels of buprenorphine prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhimanyu Sud
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Humber River Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Kellia Chiu
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Joseph Friedman
- Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Julie Dupouy
- University Department of General Medicine, University of Toulouse, Faculty of Medicine, Toulouse, France; Inserm UMR1295, University of Toulouse III, Faculty of Medicine, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wu LT, Mannelli P, John WS, Anderson A, Schwartz RP. Pharmacy-based methadone treatment in the US: views of pharmacists and opioid treatment program staff. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2023; 18:55. [PMID: 37697326 PMCID: PMC10496162 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00563-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The US federal regulations allow pharmacy administration and dispensing of methadone for opioid use disorder (PADMOUD) to increase the capability of opioid treatment programs (OTPs) in providing methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) for opioid use disorder (OUD) as part of a medication unit. However, there is a lack of research data from both pharmacy and OTP staff to inform the implementation of PADMOUD. METHODS Staff of a pharmacy (n = 8) and an OTP (n = 9) that participated in the first completed US trial on PADMOUD through electronic prescribing for methadone (parent study) were recruited to participate in this qualitative interview study to explore implementation-related factors for PADMOUD. Each interview was recorded and transcribed verbatim. NVivo was used to help identify themes of qualitative interview data. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework was used to guide the coding and interpretation of data. RESULTS Six pharmacy staff and eight OTP staff (n = 14) completed the interview. Results based on PARIHS domains were summarized, including evidence, context, and facilitation domains. Participants perceived benefits of PADMOUD for patients, pharmacies, OTPs, and payers. PADMOUD was considered to increase access for stable patients, provide additional patient service opportunities and revenues for pharmacies/pharmacists, enhance the capability of OTPs to treat more new patients, and reduce patients' cost when receiving medication at a pharmacy relative to an OTP. Both pharmacy and OTP staff were perceived to be supportive of the implementation of PADMOUD. Pharmacy staff/pharmacists were perceived to need proper training on addiction and methadone as well as a protocol of PADMOUD to conduct PADMOUD. Facilitators include having thought leaders to guide the operation, a certification program to ensure proper training of pharmacy staff/pharmacist, having updated pharmacy service software or technology to streamline the workflow of delivering PADMOUD and inventory management, and reimbursement for pharmacists. CONCLUSION This study presents the first findings on perspectives of PADMOUD from both staff of a community pharmacy and an OTP in the US. Finding on barriers and facilitators are useful data to guide the development of strategies to implement PADMOUD to help address the US opioid crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Tzy Wu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Center for Child and Family Policy, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Institute For Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Paolo Mannelli
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tay Wee Teck J, Butner JL, Baldacchino A. Understanding the use of telemedicine across different opioid use disorder treatment models: A scoping review. J Telemed Telecare 2023:1357633X231195607. [PMID: 37661829 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x231195607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has instigated the development of telemedicine-mediated provision of medications for opioid use disorder such as buprenorphine and methadone, referred to as TMOUD in this study. As services start to return to pre-pandemic norms, there is a debate around the role of TMOUD as addition to or replacement of the conventional cascade of care for people with opioid use disorder (PWOUD). This scoping review is designed to characterize existing TMOUD services and provide insights to enable a more nuanced discussion on the role of telemedicine in the care of PWOUD. METHODS The literature search was conducted in OVID Medline, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, from inception up to and including April 2023, using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The review considered any study design that detailed sufficient descriptive information on a given TMOUD service. A data extraction form was developed to collect and categorize a range of descriptive characteristics of each discrete TMOUD model identified from the obtained articles. RESULTS A total of 45 articles met the inclusion criteria, and from this, 40 discrete TMOUD services were identified. In total, 33 services were US-based, three from Canada, and one each from India, Ireland, the UK, and Norway. Through a detailed analysis of TMOUD service characteristics, four models of care were identified. These were TMOUD to facilitate inclusion health, to facilitate transitions in care, to meet complex healthcare needs, and to maintain opioid use disorder (OUD) service resilience. CONCLUSIONS Characterizing TMOUD according to its functional benefits to PWOUD and OUD services will help support evidence-based policy and practice. Additionally, particular attention is given to how digital exclusion of PWOUD can be mitigated against.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Tay Wee Teck
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
- Forward Leeds and Humankind Charity, Durham, UK
| | - Jenna L Butner
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Alex Baldacchino
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Truong A, Kablinger A, Hartman C, Hartman D, West J, Hanlon A, Lozano A, McNamara R, Seidel R, Trestman R. Noninferiority Clinical Trial of Adapted START NOW Psychotherapy for Outpatient Opioid Treatment. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3229052. [PMID: 37609219 PMCID: PMC10441517 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3229052/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Background Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) such as buprenorphine is effective for treating opioid use disorder (OUD). START NOW (SN) is a manualized, skills-based group psychotherapy originally developed and validated for the correctional population and has been shown to result in reduced risk of disciplinary infractions and future psychiatric inpatient days with a dose response effect. We investigate whether adapted START NOW is effective for treating OUD in a MOUD office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) setting in this non-inferiority clinical trial. Methods Patients enrolled in once weekly buprenorphine/suboxone MOUD OBOT were eligible for enrollment in this study. Participants were cluster-randomized, individually-randomized, or not randomized into either START NOW psychotherapy or treatment-as-usual (TAU) for 32 weeks of therapy. Treatment effectiveness was measured as the number of groups attended, treatment duration, intensity of attendance, and overall drug use as determined by drug screens. Results 137 participants were quasi-randomized to participate in SN (n = 79) or TAU (n = 58). Participants receiving START NOW psychotherapy, when compared to TAU, had comparable number of groups attended (16.5 vs. 16.7, p = 0.80), treatment duration in weeks (24.1 vs. 23.8, p = 0.62), and intensity defined by number of groups attended divided by the number of weeks to last group (0.71 vs. 0.71, p = 0.90). SN compared to TAU also had similar rates of any positive drug screen result (81.0% vs. 91.4%, p = 0.16). This suggests that adapted START NOW is noninferior to TAU, or the standard of care at our institution, for treating opioid use disorder. Conclusion Adapted START NOW is an effective psychotherapy for treating OUD when paired with buprenorphine/naloxone in the outpatient group therapy setting. Always free and publicly available, START NOW psychotherapy, along with its clinician manual and training materials, are easily accessible and distributable and may be especially useful for low-resource settings in need of evidence-based psychotherapy.
Collapse
|
15
|
Wu LT, John WS, Mannelli P, Morse ED, Anderson A, Schwartz RP. Patient perspectives on community pharmacy administered and dispensing of methadone treatment for opioid use disorder: a qualitative study in the U.S. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2023; 18:45. [PMID: 37533071 PMCID: PMC10398989 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-023-00399-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacy administration and dispensing of methadone treatment for opioid use disorder (PADMOUD) may address inadequate capability of opioid treatment programs (OTPs) in the US by expanding access to methadone at community pharmacies nationally. PADMOUD is vastly underutilized in the US. There is no published US study on OUD patients' perspectives on PADMOUD. Data are timely and needed to inform the implementation of PADMOUD in the US to address its serious opioid overdose crisis. METHODS Patient participants of the first completed US trial on PADMOUD through electronic prescribing for methadone (parent study) were interviewed to explore implementation-related factors for PADMOUD. All 20 participants of the parent study were invited to participate in this interview study. Each interview was recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify emergent themes. RESULTS Seventeen participants completed the interview. Patients' perspectives on PADMOUD were grouped into five areas. Participants reported feasibility of taking the tablet formulation of methadone at the pharmacy and identified benefits from PADMOUD (e.g., better access, efficiency, convenience) compared with usual care at the OTP. Participants perceived support for PADMOUD from their family/friends, OTP staff, and pharmacy staff. PADMOUD was perceived to be a great option for stable patients with take-home doses and those with transportation barriers. The distance (convenience), office hours, and the cost were considered factors most influencing their decision to receive methadone from a pharmacy. Nonjudgmental communication, pharmacists' training on methadone treatment, selection of patients (stable status), workflow of PADMOUD, and protection of privacy were considered key factors for improving operations of PADMOUD. CONCLUSION This study presents the first findings on patient perspectives on PADMOUD. Participants considered pharmacies more accessible than OTPs, which could encourage more people to receive methadone treatment earlier and help transition stable patients from an OTP into a local pharmacy. The findings have timely implications for informing implementation strategies of PADMOUD that consider patients' views and needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Tzy Wu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Center for Child and Family Policy, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Institute For Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | - Paolo Mannelli
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yücel SG, Higgins CD, Gupta K, Palm M. Public transport access to drug treatment before and during COVID-19: Implications for the opioid epidemic. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 116:104032. [PMID: 37172439 PMCID: PMC10130333 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Public transport disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic had wide-ranging impacts on the ability of individuals to access health care. Individuals with opioid use disorder represent an especially vulnerable population due to the necessity of frequent, supervised doses of opioid agonists. Focused on Toronto, a major Canadian city suffering from the opioid epidemic, this analysis uses novel realistic routing methodologies to quantify how travel times to individuals\220 nearest clinics changed due to public transport disruptions from 2019 to 2020. Individuals seeking opioid agonist treatment face very constrained windows of access due to the need to manage work and other essential activities. We find that thousands of households in the most materially and socially deprived neighbourhoods crossed 30 and 20-minute travel time thresholds to their nearest clinic. As even small changes to travel times can lead to missed appointments and heighten the chances of overdose and death, understanding the distribution of those most impacted can help inform future policy measures to ensure adequate access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiv Gazi Yücel
- Transport Studies Unit, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Kumar Gupta
- Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bardwell G, Bowles JM, Mansoor M, Werb D, Kerr T. Access to tablet injectable opioid agonist therapy in rural and smaller urban settings in British Columbia, Canada: a qualitative study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2023; 18:14. [PMID: 36869358 PMCID: PMC9984129 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00525-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rural and smaller urban settings in Canada are disproportionately impacted by the overdose crisis, highlighting the need for novel public health interventions within these jurisdictions. Tablet injectable opioid agonist therapy (TiOAT) programs have been implemented in select rural communities as a means to address drug-related harms. However, little is known about the accessibility of these novel programs. Therefore, we conducted this study to understand the rural context and factors that affected access of TiOAT programs. METHODS Between October 2021 to April 2022, individual qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 individuals enrolled in a TiOAT program at participating rural and smaller urban sites in British Columbia, Canada. Interview transcripts were coded using NVivo 12 and data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS TiOAT access varied considerably. TiOAT delivery in rural settings is complicated due to geographic challenges. Participants who were homeless and staying at a nearby shelter or those in centrally-located supportive housing had minimal issues compared to those living in more affordable housing on the outskirts of town with limited transportation options. Dispensing policies that required daily-witnessed ingestion multiple times daily were challenging for most. Only one site provided evening take-home doses whereas participants at the other site could only resort to the illicit opioid supply to address withdrawal outside of program hours. Participants described the clinics as providing a positive and familial social environment compared to experiences of stigma elsewhere. Medication interruptions did occur when participants were in hospital and custodial settings, leading to withdrawal, program discontinuation, and overdose risk. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the beneficial ways in which health services tailored for people who use drugs can create a stigma-free environment with an emphasis on social bonds. Other factors such as transportation access, dispensing policies, and access in rural hospitals and custodial settings produced unique challenges for rural people who use drugs. Public health authorities in rural and smaller settings should consider these factors when designing, implementing, and scaling up future substance use services, including TiOAT programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoff Bardwell
- School of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, , Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
| | - Jeanette M Bowles
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, , Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Manal Mansoor
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
| | - Dan Werb
- Centre On Drug Policy Evaluation, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON, M5B 1T8, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases & Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92023, USA
| | - Thomas Kerr
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, , Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dobischok S, Metcalfe R, Matzinger E, Palis H, Marchand K, Harrison S, MacDonald S, Byres D, Schechter M, Bansback N, Oviedo-Joekes E. Measuring the preferences of injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) clients: Development of a person-centered scale (best-worst scaling). THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 112:103948. [PMID: 36586152 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) is effective for opioid use disorder (OUD), yet little is known about client preferences for accessing iOAT (e.g., with diacetylmorphine, hydromorphone, buprenorphine, fentanyl, etc.). Best-worst scaling (BWS) is a preference elicitation method from health economics that has never been applied to addiction care broadly, or iOAT specifically. We describe the stages of developing a BWS scale that assesses iOAT clients' treatment delivery preferences to inform program planning and maximize healthcare efficiency. METHODS We underwent several steps to reveal the relevant attributes/levels and design the scale structure. An initial list of potential attributes and levels was established from a literature review and prior qualitative data. Then, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with clients (n=21) on their iOAT preferences to confirm the attributes and prioritize/include new ones. Next, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with iOAT experts and stakeholders to receive their input on the draft list of attributes and levels. A BWS profile case design was piloted with iOAT clients (n=18) from different sites during a think aloud interview. After several rounds of revisions, the final version was tested by iOAT clients (n=2) before the scale was launched. RESULTS We developed a person-centered scale that assesses current and former iOAT clients' most and least wanted aspects of iOAT delivery. The final version yielded 7 unique attributes: choice of medication, choice of dose, convenience, location & space, scheduling & routines, staff & training, and types of services offered. CONCLUSION This scale can help expand iOAT programs in a way that is person-centered, rapid, and affordable. The methodology is a guide for other regions with similar populations who aim to develop strong quantitative methodologies that prioritize client collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Dobischok
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, 575- 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Rebecca Metcalfe
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, 575- 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Matzinger
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, 575- 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Heather Palis
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, 575- 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Kirsten Marchand
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, 575- 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Scott Harrison
- Providence Health Care, Providence Crosstown Clinic, 84 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 1G6, Canada
| | - Scott MacDonald
- Providence Health Care, Providence Crosstown Clinic, 84 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 1G6, Canada
| | - David Byres
- Provincial Health Services Authority, 200-1333 W Broadway, Vancouver, BC V6H 4C1, Canada
| | - Martin Schechter
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, 575- 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Nick Bansback
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, 575- 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, 575- 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication for opioid use disorder (OUD) with methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone is recommended for pregnant women with OUD. Traditional buprenorphine/naloxone induction requires patients to be in moderate withdrawal before the first dose of medication to minimize the chances of precipitated withdrawal. The low-dose buprenorphine "microinduction" (Bernese) method was described in 2016 and involves giving small doses of buprenorphine to patients for whom opioid withdrawal was not desirable. This method is being used widely in Vancouver in the context of high rates of overdose due to fentanyl poisoning. CASE PRESENTATION A 24-year-old woman, in her first pregnancy, with severe opioid and stimulant use disorder successfully started on buprenorphine/naloxone through a low-dose-induction protocol. The dose was started at 0.5 mg sublingual daily and slowly increased to 18 mg over 17 days. She continued to use fentanyl/heroin during the induction. She did not experience precipitated withdrawal and was able to stop using nonprescribed opioids once at a therapeutic dose of buprenorphine/naloxone. DISCUSSION This represents the first documented case of successful buprenorphine/naloxone low-dose induction in pregnancy. First-line recommendations still remain to use traditional buprenorphine/naloxone induction when patients present in withdrawal. Obtaining informed consent regarding the lack of research on low-dose induction in pregnancy as well as discussion of risks and benefits is essential. CONCLUSION Low-dose induction with buprenorphine/naloxone was successfully done in an outpatient setting. This represents a novel way of initiation of medication for OUD, which may enhance choice and collaboration between health care providers and women impacted by substance use in pregnancy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Teck JTW, Zlatkute G, Perez A, Dritschel H, Ghosh A, Potenza MN, Ambekar A, Ekhtiari H, Stein D, Khazaal Y, Arunogiri S, Torrens M, Ferri M, Galea-Singer S, Baldacchino A. Key implementation factors in telemedicine-delivered medications for opioid use disorder: a scoping review informed by normalisation process theory. Lancet Psychiatry 2023; 10:50-64. [PMID: 36526346 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00374-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Telemedicine could improve access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Telemedicine-delivered MOUD (TMOUD) has expanded substantially in response to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on in-person clinical contact, yet this expansion has not happened consistently across all health systems and countries. This Review aims to understand key factors in TMOUD implementation that might explain variations in uptake. We did a scoping review using three English language databases for articles reporting on the implementation of TMOUD services. 57 peer-reviewed articles were identified, subjected to open coding and thematic analysis, and further interpreted through normalisation process theory (NPT). NPT was originally used to evaluate telehealth innovations and has been applied extensively to describe, assess, and develop the implementation potential of a broad range of complex health-care interventions. By categorising our findings according to the four core NPT constructs of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring, we aim to rationalise the current evidence base to show the workability of TMOUD in practice. We find that variations in TMOUD models in practice depend on organisations' attitudes towards risk, clinicians' tensions around giving up control over standard practices, organisation-level support in overcoming operational and technological challenges, and evaluation methods that might neglect a potential widening of the digital divide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Tay Wee Teck
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK; Forward Leeds and Humankind Charity, Durham, UK.
| | - Giedre Zlatkute
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Alberto Perez
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Heidi Dritschel
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Abhishek Ghosh
- Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Marc N Potenza
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; the Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Atul Ambekar
- National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Dan Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Yasser Khazaal
- Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Research Center, Institute of Mental Health, Montréal University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shalini Arunogiri
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Marta Torrens
- School of Medicine, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVIC-UCC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marica Ferri
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Susanna Galea-Singer
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK; NHS Fife Addiction Services, Leven, UK
| | - Alex Baldacchino
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pijl EM, Alraja A, Duff E, Cooke C, Dash S, Nayak N, Lamoureux J, Poulin G, Knight E, Fry B. Barriers and facilitators to opioid agonist therapy in rural and remote communities in Canada: an integrative review. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:62. [PMID: 36028837 PMCID: PMC9412807 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00463-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People living in rural and remote communities in Canada are often disproportionately impacted by opioid use disorder. When compared to urban centres, rural and remote populations face additional barriers to treatment, including geographical distance as well as chronic shortages of health care professionals. This integrative review of the literature was conducted to explore the facilitators and barriers of OAT in rural and remote Canadian communities. Methods A search of the literature identified relevant studies published between 2001 and 2021. Results The search strategy yielded 26 scholarly peer-reviewed publications, which explored specific barriers and facilitators to rural and remote OAT in Canada, along with two reports and one fact sheet from the grey literature. Most of the scholarly articles were descriptive studies (n = 14) or commentaries (n = 9); there were only three intervention studies. Facilitators and barriers to OAT programs were organized into six themes: intrapersonal/patient factors, social/non-medical program factors, family/social context factors (including community factors), infrastructure/environmental factors, health care provider factors, and system/policy factors. Conclusions Although themes in the literature resembled the social-ecological framework, most of the studies focused on the patient-provider dyad. Two of the most compelling studies focused on community factors that positively impacted OAT success and highlighted a holistic approach to care, nested in a community-based holistic model. Further research is required to foster OAT programs in rural and remote communities.
Collapse
|
22
|
Russell C, Lange S, Kouyoumdjian F, Butler A, Ali F. Opioid agonist treatment take-home doses ('carries'): Are current guidelines resulting in low treatment coverage among high-risk populations in Canada and the USA? Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:89. [PMID: 35948961 PMCID: PMC9363267 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-022-00671-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is the primary intervention for opioid use disorder (OUD) in Canada and the USA. Yet, a number of barriers contribute to sub-optimal treatment uptake and retention, including daily-supervised medication administration. Thus, clients are eventually granted access to take-home OAT doses (i.e., ‘carries’) to reduce this burden. However, this decision is based on physician discretion and whether patients can demonstrate stability in various life domains, many of which are inextricably linked to the social determinants of health (SDOH). Current Canadian and USA OAT carry guidance documents are not standardized and do not take the SDOH into consideration, resulting in the potential for inequitable access to OAT carries, which may be the case particularly among marginalized populations such as individuals with OUD who have been released from custody. This perspective article posits that current OAT guidelines contribute to inequities in access to OAT carries, and that these inequities likely result in disproportionately low coverage for OUD treatment among some high-risk groups, including individuals on release from incarceration in particular. Relevant impacts of COVID-19 and related policy changes are considered, and suggestions and recommendations to amend current OAT guidance documents are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cayley Russell
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada. .,Ontario Node, Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), 33 Ursula Franklin St, ON, M5S 2S1, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Shannon Lange
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.,Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), ON, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fiona Kouyoumdjian
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amanda Butler
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Farihah Ali
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.,Ontario Node, Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), 33 Ursula Franklin St, ON, M5S 2S1, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Juwono S, Milloy MJ, Choi J, Fairbairn N, Nolan S, Socías ME. Opioid agonist treatment improves progression through the HIV cascade of care among people living with HIV who use unregulated opioids. AIDS 2022; 36:1429-1436. [PMID: 35608126 PMCID: PMC9329231 DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000003247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) has been shown to improve certain HIV-related treatment measures among people with HIV (PHIV) with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, there is limited data on the impacts of OAT along the whole HIV cascade of care. DESIGN AND METHODS Using data from an ongoing cohort of PHIV who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada, we used cumulative link mixed-effects models to estimate the independent effect of OAT on achieving progressive steps in the HIV cascade among participants using unregulated opioids daily, after adjusting for confounders. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2017, we recruited 639 PHIV regularly using opioids (median age 42 years, 59% male, 56% White), of whom 70% were on OAT at their baseline visit. Engagement in OAT showed a nonsignificant trend with higher linkage to HIV care (adjusted partial proportional odds ratio [APPO] = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-3.69), and significantly higher cumulative odds of successfully achieving subsequent HIV cascade steps: on ART (APPO = 3.85, 95% CI: 2.33-6.37); adherent to ART (APPO = 3.15, 95% CI: 2.15-4.62); and HIV viral suppression (APPO = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.51-3.14). CONCLUSIONS This study found a high level of OAT engagement among PHIV using unregulated opioids and that OAT engagement resulted in significantly increased progression through some of the higher steps of the HIV cascade. While these findings are encouraging, they highlight the need to reach populations off OAT to maximize the clinical and community-level benefits of ART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M-J Milloy
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Nadia Fairbairn
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Seonaid Nolan
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - M Eugenia Socías
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Day N, Wass M, Smith K. Virtual opioid agonist treatment: Alberta's virtual opioid dependency program and outcomes. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2022; 17:40. [PMID: 35902924 PMCID: PMC9330968 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-022-00323-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Virtually delivered healthcare (telehealth, telemedicine) has the potential to reduce gaps in access to opioid agonist therapy (OAT). Barriers to accessing OAT such as lack of transportation, in-person induction requirements, employment demands and limited childcare options reduce treatment opportunities for clients. A completely virtual model of care has been developed in Alberta, Canada. This paper introduces the unique virtual clinic model and describes outcomes from that model. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted using datasets within existing electronic health records and databases from Alberta’s Virtual Opioid Dependency Program (VODP). Outcome data were extracted at admission to ongoing care by Case Management within the VODP and at 3, 6 and 12 months for the duration of treatment. Utilization trends over three years were analyzed, including admissions, discharges and active client information. Data regarding clinical outcomes for clients engaged in ongoing care with the VODP were aggregated for analysis over four time periods, including treatment retention rates at 6 and 12 months. Results A total of 440 client records were included in the study sample. Descriptive analysis showed rapid growth in utilization over three fiscal years. Despite rapid growth in utilization, median wait days for treatment decreased from 6 to 0 days with the initiation of a Same Day Start service to support low barrier immediate access to treatment. Treatment retention rates for clients in ongoing care were comparable to published reports, with 90% of the study sample remaining in treatment over 6 months, and 58% showing retention over 12 months. Clients reported high levels of satisfaction (90%) and outcomes reflected reductions in drug use and overdose as well as improved social functioning. Conclusions The VODP model demonstrated high levels of client satisfaction, rapid growth in utilization and positive preliminary clinical outcomes. Entirely virtual delivery of opioid agonist therapy is a promising option to facilitate access to evidence based treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) in the context of a fentanyl overdose crisis, particularly for individuals living in rural or underserved areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Day
- Addiction & Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Ponoka, AB, Canada.,Virtual Opioid Dependency Program, P.O. Box 1000, T4J 1R8, Ponoka, AB, Canada
| | - Maureen Wass
- Addiction & Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Ponoka, AB, Canada. .,Virtual Opioid Dependency Program, P.O. Box 1000, T4J 1R8, Ponoka, AB, Canada.
| | - Kelly Smith
- Addiction & Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Ponoka, AB, Canada.,Virtual Opioid Dependency Program, P.O. Box 1000, T4J 1R8, Ponoka, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Evaluating interventions to facilitate opioid agonist treatment access among people who inject drugs in Toronto, Ontario during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 104:103680. [PMID: 35447476 PMCID: PMC9005368 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Background In March 2020, following a provincial COVID-19 emergency declaration, modifications to opioid agonist treatment (OAT) were introduced in Ontario, Canada to promote treatment access amid the pandemic and ongoing opioid overdose crisis. Modifications included federal exemptions to facilitate OAT prescription re-fills, extensions, and deliveries and interim treatment guidance emphasizing take-home (non-observed) doses and reduced urine drug screening for OAT patients. Methods We conducted an interrupted time series study using health administrative data from September 17th, 2019–September 21st, 2020, on 359 people who inject drugs with suspected opioid use disorder in Toronto, Ontario. We used segmented regression analyses to evaluate the joint effects of the provincial COVID-19 emergency declaration, federal OAT exemptions, and interim treatment guidance—all implemented between March 17th–23rd, 2020—on the weekly proportion of participants enrolled in OAT (i.e., ≥1 day(s) covered with methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone), with an opioid-related overdose (based on emergency department visits and hospitalizations), and who died (all-cause), and the weekly proportion of OAT-enrolled participants receiving take-home doses (i.e., ≥1 day(s) covered) and undergoing urine drug screening. Results Post-implementation, the interventions were associated with immediate absolute changes in OAT enrollment (+1.95%; 95% CI=0.04%–3.85%), receipt of take-home doses (+18.3%; 95% CI=13.2%–23.4%), and urine drug screening (-22.4%; 95% CI=[-26.9%]–[-17.9%]) and a gradual absolute increase of 0.56% in urine drug screening week-to-week (95% CI=0.27%–0.86%) beyond the pre-implementation trend. At 26 weeks post-implementation, OAT enrollment and urine drug screening approached pre-implementation levels whereas the increase in take-home doses was largely sustained (+15.0%; 95% CI=4.33%–25.6%). No post-implementation increases in opioid-related overdoses were observed. Death was not modelled (low event frequency). Conclusion Changes to OAT provision following provincial COVID-19 restrictions were associated with an immediate and sustained increase in take-home dose coverage among OAT-enrolled participants, without corresponding increases in opioid-related overdoses among all participants.
Collapse
|
26
|
Russell C, Nafeh F, Pang M, MacDonald SF, Derkzen D, Rehm J, Fischer B. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) experiences and release plans among federally incarcerated individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) in Ontario, Canada: a mixed-methods study. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:436. [PMID: 35246083 PMCID: PMC8897889 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12685-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Incarcerated populations experience an elevated prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD). Federal correctional institutions in Canada have increasingly treated OUD among correctional populations via opioid agonist treatment (OAT) – an evidence based pharmacotherapy that works to reduce drug use and related health harms. However, there is limited evidence regarding incarcerated individuals’ experiences with institutional-based OAT, as well potential OAT-related community release prospects. This information is important for optimal treatment retention and improved health. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a longitudinal follow-up study examining OAT-related experiences among federally incarcerated individuals before and after community release. This article focuses on the baseline (pre-release) data. Methods This mixed-methods study examined OAT-related experiences and release prospects among n = 46 individuals scheduled for community release, recruited from seven federal prisons located in Ontario, Canada. Participants underwent a comprehensive interviewer-administered on-site assessment, including quantitative and qualitative items. Assessment data was furthermore linked to administrative correctional data. Data were analyzed using thematic qualitative and descriptive quantitative approaches. Results Participants had complex histories with opioid use including related negative health outcomes. Experiences with institutional OAT were divergent and provision was not standardized; those with OAT engagement pre-admission did not experience many challenges, whereas those initiating OAT during incarceration experienced barriers such as treatment waitlists and adverse process experiences. Most participants expressed a preference for buprenorphine-naloxone over methadone, but described difficulties accessing it. Participants were keen to transition into community-based treatment, yet envisaged prospective barriers and facilitators concerning successful reintegration and treatment continuity. Conclusions Major barriers towards the current administration of OAT in federal correctional systems in Canada exist, including extensive waitlists, non-standardized practices, and challenges accessing preferred OAT formulations; this contributes to sub-optimal treatment. Eliminating waitlists, standardizing OAT provision, providing additional OAT options, and more comprehensive release planning may be essential for treatment retention and positive outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cayley Russell
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) & Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
| | - Frishta Nafeh
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) & Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada
| | - Michelle Pang
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) & Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada
| | - Shanna Farrell MacDonald
- Research Branch, Correctional Service Canada, 340 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, ON, K1P 0P9, Canada
| | - Dena Derkzen
- Research Branch, Correctional Service Canada, 340 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, ON, K1P 0P9, Canada
| | - Jürgen Rehm
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) & Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,Campbell Family Mental Health Research InstituteCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.,Institut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Str. 46, 01187, Dresden, Germany.,Department of International Health Projects, Institute for Leadership and Health Management, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Bol'shaya Pirogovskaya Ulitsa, 19с1, Moscow, Russia, 119146
| | - Benedikt Fischer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.,Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction (CARMHA), Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, V6B 5K3, Canada.,School of Population Health and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.,Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pharmacists expanded role in providing care for opioid use disorder during COVID-19: A qualitative study exploring pharmacists' experiences. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 232:109303. [PMID: 35032858 PMCID: PMC8743855 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) struggled with access to prescribers and opioid agonist therapy (OAT). Recognizing this gap in care, Health Canada issued a short-term subsection 56(1) class exemption from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act authorizing pharmacists to independently manage controlled substances. The purpose of this study was to explore the expanded role of Canadian pharmacists in providing care to patients with OUD during the pandemic. METHODS We conducted qualitative key informant telephone interviews in the fall of 2020 with Canadian pharmacists who used the exemption. We included community or primary healthcare team-based pharmacists who managed opioid medication under the exemption. We recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified all transcripts. Data was analyzed using a thematic approach involving line-by-line coding and constant comparison. RESULTS We interviewed nineteen pharmacists with representation from all provinces and urban and rural practice settings. Three major themes emerged that captured the pharmacists' perspectives when providing care for patients with OUD during the pandemic: (i) continuity of care; (ii) harm reduction; and (iii) access to care. Pharmacists used the exemption to extend prescriptions, transfer prescriptions, receive verbal orders, and deliver OAT. CONCLUSIONS Throughout the pandemic, pharmacists were able to provide continuity of care to patients with OUD who would have otherwise been unable to access care. The exemption permitted pharmacists to assess patients and provide OAT through this expanded role. Other countries should look to the Canadian experience and leverage the expertise of the pharmacist to expand their scope so that they can help fill the gap in care for patients with OUD.
Collapse
|
28
|
Bouck Z, Tricco AC, Rosella LC, Ling V, Gomes T, Tadrous M, Fox MP, Scheim AI, Werb D. Validation of Self-reported Opioid Agonist Treatment Among People Who Inject Drugs Using Prescription Dispensation Records. Epidemiology 2022; 33:287-294. [PMID: 34799473 DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies of people who inject drugs (PWID) commonly use questionnaires to determine whether participants are currently, or have recently been, on opioid agonist treatment for opioid use disorder. However, these previously unvalidated self-reported treatment measures may be susceptible to inaccurate reporting. METHODS We linked baseline questionnaire data from 521 PWID in the Ontario integrated Supervised Injection Services cohort in Toronto (November 2018-March 2020) with record-level health administrative data. We assessed the validity (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value [PPV and NPV]) of self-reported recent (in the past 6 months) and current (as of interview) opioid agonist treatment with methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone relative to prescription dispensation records from a provincial narcotics monitoring system, considered the reference standard. RESULTS For self-reported recent opioid agonist treatment, sensitivity was 78% (95% CI = 72, 83), specificity was 90% (95% CI = 86, 94), PPV was 90% (95% CI = 85, 93), and NPV was 79% (95% CI = 74, 84). For self-reported current opioid agonist treatment, sensitivity was 84% (95% CI = 78, 90), specificity was 87% (95% CI = 83, 91), PPV was 74% (95% CI = 67, 81), and NPV was 93% (95% CI = 89, 95). CONCLUSIONS Self-reported opioid agonist treatment measures were fairly accurate among PWID, with some exceptions. Inaccurate recall due to a lengthy lookback window may explain underreporting of recent treatment, whereas social desirability bias may have led to overreporting of current treatment. These validation data could be used in future studies of PWID to adjust for misclassification in similar self-reported treatment measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Bouck
- From the Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre on Drug Policy Evaluation, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Knowledge Translation Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura C Rosella
- From the Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tara Gomes
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mina Tadrous
- Ontario Drug Policy Research Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew P Fox
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Ayden I Scheim
- Centre on Drug Policy Evaluation, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Dan Werb
- Centre on Drug Policy Evaluation, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wu LT, John WS, Morse ED, Adkins S, Pippin J, Brooner RK, Schwartz RP. Opioid treatment program and community pharmacy collaboration for methadone maintenance treatment: results from a feasibility clinical trial. Addiction 2022; 117:444-456. [PMID: 34286886 PMCID: PMC8748270 DOI: 10.1111/add.15641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Pharmacy administration and dispensing of methadone for methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) can expand treatment access for opioid use disorder (OUD). This study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of a novel model permitting an opioid treatment program (OTP) physician to prescribe methadone for OUD treatment through collaboration with a partnered pharmacy. DESIGN Non-randomized, single-arm, open-label feasibility trial. SETTING One OTP and one community pharmacy in the United States. PARTICIPANTS One OTP physician, two pharmacists and 20 MMT patients receiving between six and 13 take-home methadone doses at 5-160 mg/day. INTERVENTION Patients' methadone administration and dispensing of take-home doses was transferred from the OTP to the pharmacy for 3 months. MEASUREMENTS Primary outcome was medication adherence. Secondary outcomes were recruitment, treatment retention, substance use, counseling attendance at the OTP, pharmacist prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) use, safety and satisfaction. FINDINGS Of 29 patients eligible at pre-screen, 20 patients (69%) enrolled into the study. Recruitment occurred from 6 August 2020 to 10 October 2020. Treatment retention rate at month 3 was 80% (16 of 20). Two participants returned early to the OTP because of a work/schedule change, one due to pregnancy and one following a non-study-related hospitalization. Medication adherence among 16 patients who were retained was 100%. Intervention fidelity was 100%. All participants attended random call-back visits. None showed evidence of tampering/diversion of methadone. Pharmacists checked the PDMP at all visits. All participants attended psychosocial counseling as planned. There were no positive urine screens for illicit opioid use and no study-related adverse events. All participants endorsed 'pharmacy is the right location for receiving methadone for MMT', 88% endorsed 'convenient or very convenient to receive methadone at the pharmacy' and 88% were satisfied or very satisfied with the quality of treatment offered. CONCLUSIONS This feasibility trial has found pharmacy administration and dispensing of physician-prescribed methadone for methadone maintenance treatment to be feasible and acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Tzy Wu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA,Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA,Center for Child and Family Policy, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Duke Institute For Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA,Corresponding author:
| | - William S. John
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dobischok S, Metcalfe RK, Matzinger EA, Lock K, Harrison S, MacDonald S, Amara S, Schechter MT, Bansback N, Oviedo-Joekes E. Feasibility of Testing Client Preferences for Accessing Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment (iOAT): A Pilot Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:3405-3413. [PMID: 36582266 PMCID: PMC9793789 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s391532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). To our knowledge, no research has systematically studied client preferences for accessing iOAT. Incorporating preferences could help meet the heterogenous needs of clients and make addiction care more person-centred. This paper presents a pilot study of a best-worst scaling (BWS) preference elicitation survey that aimed to assess if the survey was feasible and accessible for our population and to test that the survey could gather sound data that would suit our planned analyses. PATIENTS AND METHODS Current and former iOAT clients (n = 18) completed a BWS survey supported by an interviewer using a think-aloud approach. The survey was administered on PowerPoint, and responses and contextual field notes were recorded manually. Think-aloud audio was recorded on Audacity. RESULTS Clients' feedback fell into five categories: framing of the task, accessibility, conceptualization of attributes and levels, formatting, and behaviour predicting questions. Survey repetitiveness was the most consistent feedback. The data simulation showed that 100 responses should provide an adequate sample size. CONCLUSION This pilot demonstrates the type of analysis that can be done with BWS in our population, suggests that such analysis is feasible, and highlights the importance of the interviewer and participant working side-by-side throughout the task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Dobischok
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rebecca K Metcalfe
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Kurt Lock
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Scott Harrison
- Providence Health Care, Providence Crosstown Clinic, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Scott MacDonald
- Providence Health Care, Providence Crosstown Clinic, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sherif Amara
- SafePoint Supervised Consumption Site, Fraser Health Authority, Surrey, BC, Canada
| | - Martin T Schechter
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nick Bansback
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Correspondence: Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, 575-1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada, Tel +1 604-682-2344 Ext. 62973, Fax +1-604-806-8210, Email
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Supportive Interventions During Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: A Review of the Literature. Gastroenterol Nurs 2021; 43:E172-E183. [PMID: 33003028 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
There are an estimated 3 million people living with chronic hepatitis C, yet many have limited access to healthcare and treatment due to a variety of behavioral/lifestyle determinants of health. The aim of this literature review was to examine care models and innovations for people successfully treated from 2011 to 2018. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL to identify care models for people undergoing treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Ten articles met criteria for inclusion and included multiple types of care models, including nurse initiated (n = 2), telemedicine care (n = 3), group visit (n = 1), concurrent treatment (n = 1), community health center care (n = 1), and integrated care (n = 2). Eight of the studies focused on people with mental health challenges and/or substance use disorder. Sustained virological response was the primary outcome of all studies; adherence was a secondary outcome measured in 8 studies.This search occurred during a period where treatment moved from interferon-based therapy to all-oral direct-acting antiviral medications, representing a paradigm shift in treatment of chronic hepatitis C. As new treatments offer cure for up to 95% of patients, these studies provided strong evidence of benefit for innovative care models for patients with mental health and substance use disorder to complete treatment.
Collapse
|
32
|
Maina G, Fernandes de Sousa L, Mcharo S, Kiburi S. Risk perceptions and recovery threats for clients with a history of methadone maintenance therapy dropout. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2020.1867661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey Maina
- College of Nursing, Prince Albert Campus, University of Saskatchewan, Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | - Solomon Mcharo
- College of Nursing, Prince Albert Campus, University of Saskatchewan, Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Sarah Kiburi
- College of Nursing, Ngara Clinic, Nairobi County, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Comparing characteristics and outcomes of different opioid agonist treatment modalities among opioid-dependent federal men correctional populations in Canada. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 100:103480. [PMID: 34656817 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited evidence exists in Canada on outcomes related to Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) and/or differences between OAT modalities among persons in correctional institutions. This study addresses this knowledge gap by examining key characteristics and outcomes of men in Canadian federal correctional institutions across treatment modalities. METHODS A retrospective cohort of men incarcerated in federal correctional institutions (N = 2833) were classified into four groups - three OAT participant groups: prescribed methadone (M-OAT), prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone®; S-OAT) and those who switched between the two OAT modalities at least once (X-OAT). The fourth group was a non-treatment comparison group (Non-OAT). Two-thirds of study participants were released and examined for post-release outcomes. Descriptive statistics and multi-variate Cox proportional hazards regression were used. RESULTS The X-OAT group was more likely than the other study groups to have positive urinalysis tests, disciplinary charges, or institutional security or behavioral incidents. Survival analysis indicated that the X-OAT had an adjusted hazard of a return to custody that was 57% greater than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that individuals switching OAT modalities are a more complex group needing additional supports, especially for community reintegration. Although few of the returns to custody were due to new offences, a third of participants in the OAT groups had their release revoked, indicating a high need population mostly due to their substance use.
Collapse
|
34
|
Vo AT, Magana C, Hickman M, Borquez A, Beletsky L, Martin NK, Cepeda JA. Assessing HIV and overdose risks for people who use drugs exposed to compulsory drug abstinence programs (CDAP): A systematic review and meta-analysis. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 96:103401. [PMID: 34389218 PMCID: PMC9027650 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence supports integrating drug use treatment, harm reduction, and HIV prevention services to address dual epidemics of drug use disorders and HIV. These dual epidemics have spurred a rise in legally-enforced compulsory drug abstinence programs (CDAP), despite limited evidence on its effectiveness. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the association between CDAP exposure and HIV and overdose-related risk. METHODS We searched PubMed, EBSCOhost and Sociological Abstracts for studies that contained an individual-level association between CDAP exposure and related HIV or overdose risks, with no date restrictions. Meta-analyses were conducted on data abstracted from eligible studies, using pooled random-effects models and I-squared statistics. We assessed quality of the studies across 14 criteria for observational studies. RESULTS Out of 2,226 abstracts screened, we included 8 studies (5253 individuals/776 events) across China, Mexico, Thailand, Norway, and the United States. All but two were cross-sectional analyses, limiting strength of observed associations. In the two studies that reported association between CDAP and HIV seropositivity or receptive syringe sharing, findings were inconsistent and did not indicate that those with exposure to CDAP had increased odds of HIV or syringe sharing. However, we found the odds of experiencing non-fatal overdose in lifetime and in the last 6-12 months were 2.02 (95% CI 0.22 - 18.86, p = 0.16) to 3.67 times higher (95% CI 0.21 - 62.88, p = 0.39), respectively, among those with CDAP exposure than those without. CONCLUSION Research assessing HIV risk associated with CDAP is scant and inconclusive, while evidence of robust associations between CDAP and overdose risk continues to mount. More rigorous, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the causal relationships between CDAP and these health outcomes. Aside from the growing evidence base on collateral harms, ethical considerations dictate that voluntary, evidence-based drug treatment should be prioritized to address the drivers of excess morbidity and mortality among people who use drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anh T Vo
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| | - Christopher Magana
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | | | - Annick Borquez
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Leo Beletsky
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; Northeastern University School of Law and Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Natasha K Martin
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Javier A Cepeda
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Piske M, Homayra F, Min JE, Zhou H, Marchand C, Mead A, Ng J, Woolner M, Nosyk B. Opioid Use Disorder and Perinatal Outcomes. Pediatrics 2021; 148:peds.2021-050279. [PMID: 34479983 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-050279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evidence on the perinatal health of mother-infant dyads affected by opioids is limited. Elevated risks of opioid-related harms for people with opioid use disorder (OUD) increase the urgency to identify protective factors for mothers and infants. Our objectives were to determine perinatal outcomes after an OUD diagnosis and associations between opioid agonist treatment and birth outcomes. METHODS We conducted a population-based retrospective study among all women with diagnosed OUD before delivery and within the puerperium period in British Columbia, Canada, between 2000 and 2019 from provincial health administrative data. Controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, we determined associations of opioid agonist treatment on birth weight, gestational age, infant disorders related to gestational age and birth weight, and neonatal abstinence syndrome via logistic regression. RESULTS The population included 4574 women and 6720 live births. Incidence of perinatal OUD increased from 166 in 2000 to 513 in 2019. Compared with discontinuing opioid agonist treatment during pregnancy, continuous opioid agonist treatment reduced odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio: 0.6; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.8) and low birth weight (adjusted odds ratio: 0.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.2-0.7). Treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone (compared with methadone) reduced odds of each outcome including neonatal abstinence syndrome (adjusted odds ratio: 0.6; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.9). CONCLUSIONS Perinatal OUD in British Columbia tripled in incidence over a 20-year period. Sustained opioid agonist treatment during pregnancy reduced the risk of adverse birth outcomes, highlighting the need for expanded services, including opioid agonist treatment to support mothers and infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah Piske
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fahmida Homayra
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jeong E Min
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Haoxuan Zhou
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Carolyn Marchand
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Annabel Mead
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jennifer Ng
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Megan Woolner
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bohdan Nosyk
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada .,Simon Fraser University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kronfli N, Dussault C, Bartlett S, Fuchs D, Kaita K, Harland K, Martin B, Whitten-Nagle C, Cox J. Disparities in hepatitis C care across Canadian provincial prisons: Implications for hepatitis C micro-elimination. CANADIAN LIVER JOURNAL 2021; 4:292-310. [PMID: 35992251 PMCID: PMC9202774 DOI: 10.3138/canlivj-2020-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delivery of hepatitis C virus (HCV) care to people in prison is essential to HCV elimination. We aimed to describe current HCV care practices across Canada's adult provincial prisons. METHODS One representative per provincial prison health care team (except Ontario) was invited to participate in a web-based survey from January to June 2020. The outcomes of interest were HCV screening and treatment, treatment restrictions, and harm reduction services. The government ministry responsible for health care was determined. Non-nominal data were aggregated by province and ministry; descriptive statistical analyses were used to report outcomes. RESULTS The survey was completed by 59/65 (91%) prisons. On-demand, risk-based, opt-in, and opt-out screening are offered by 19 (32%), 10 (17%), 18 (31%), and 9 (15%) prisons, respectively; 3 prisons offer no HCV screening. Liver fibrosis assessments are rare (8 prisons access transient elastography, and 15 use aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio or Fibrosis-4); 20 (34%) prisons lack linkage to care programs. Only 32 (54%) prisons have ever initiated HCV treatment on site. Incarceration length and a fibrosis staging of ≥F2 are the most common eligibility restrictions for treatment. Opioid agonist therapy is available in 83% of prisons; needle and syringe programs are not available anywhere. Systematic screening and greater access to treatment and harm reduction services are more common where the Ministry of Health is responsible. CONCLUSIONS Tremendous variability exists in HCV screening and care practices across Canada's provincial prisons. To advance HCV care, adopting opt-out screening and removing eligibility restrictions may be important initial strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Kronfli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Camille Dussault
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sofia Bartlett
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dennaye Fuchs
- ID Clinic, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Kelly Kaita
- Department of Medicine, John Buhler Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Kate Harland
- Centre for Research, Education and Clinical Care of At-Risk Populations, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Brandi Martin
- Department of Justice and Public Safety, Community and Correctional Services, Government of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
| | - Cindy Whitten-Nagle
- Department of Justice and Public Safety, Adult Corrections, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Joseph Cox
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To assess the current state of the opioid overdose crisis along three major axes: drug markets and patterns of use, the effectiveness of systems of care, and international developments. RECENT FINDINGS Overdose is a major contributor to mortality and disability among people who use drugs. The increasing number of opioid overdoses in North America especially is an indication of changing drug markets and failing regional systems of care. Globally, we see three clusters of overdose prevalence: (1) a group of countries led by the United States with historically high rates of opioid overdose, (2) a group of countries with increasing rates within a concerning range, (3) a group with very low rates. The contamination of street drugs, the quality and accessibility of treatment, and the overall system of care all contribute to the prevalence of overdose. SUMMARY Drug markets and pattern of consumption in parts of the world are shifting towards contamination and opioids like fentanyl as the drug of choice, which dismantles insufficient and largely ineffective systems of care. Furthermore, outside of North America, more countries like Estonia, Lithuania, Sweden, Finland, and Norway show very concerning numbers. Without a consistent system response, effects will be devastating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Michael Krausz
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Joudrey PJ, Adams ZM, Bach P, Van Buren S, Chaiton JA, Ehrenfeld L, Guerra ME, Gleeson B, Kimmel SD, Medley A, Mekideche W, Paquet M, Sung M, Wang M, You Kheang ROO, Zhang J, Wang EA, Edelman EJ. Methadone Access for Opioid Use Disorder During the COVID-19 Pandemic Within the United States and Canada. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2118223. [PMID: 34297070 PMCID: PMC8303098 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Methadone access may be uniquely vulnerable to disruption during COVID-19, and even short delays in access are associated with decreased medication initiation and increased illicit opioid use and overdose death. Relative to Canada, US methadone provision is more restricted and limited to specialized opioid treatment programs. Objective To compare timely access to methadone initiation in the US and Canada during COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study was conducted from May to June 2020. Participating clinics provided methadone for opioid use disorder in 14 US states and territories and 3 Canadian provinces with the highest opioid overdose death rates. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2020 to January 2021. Exposures Nation and type of health insurance (US Medicaid and US self-pay vs Canadian provincial). Main Outcomes and Measures Proportion of clinics accepting new patients and days to first appointment. Results Among 268 of 298 US clinics contacted as a patient with Medicaid (90%), 271 of 301 US clinics contacted as a self-pay patient (90%), and 237 of 288 Canadian clinics contacted as a patient with provincial insurance (82%), new patients were accepted for methadone at 231 clinics (86%) during US Medicaid contacts, 230 clinics (85%) during US self-pay contacts, and at 210 clinics (89%) during Canadian contacts. Among clinics not accepting new patients, at least 44% of 27 clinics reported that the COVID-19 pandemic was the reason. The mean wait for first appointment was greater among US Medicaid contacts (3.5 days [95% CI, 2.9-4.2 days]) and US self-pay contacts (4.1 days [95% CI, 3.4-4.8 days]) than Canadian contacts (1.9 days [95% CI, 1.7-2.1 days]) (P < .001). Open-access model (walk-in hours for new patients without an appointment) utilization was reported by 57 Medicaid (30%), 57 self-pay (30%), and 115 Canadian (59%) contacts offering an appointment. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of 2 nations, more than 1 in 10 methadone clinics were not accepting new patients. Canadian clinics offered more timely methadone access than US opioid treatment programs. These results suggest that the methadone access shortage was exacerbated by COVID-19 and that changes to the US opioid treatment program model are needed to improve the timeliness of access. Increased open-access model adoption may increase timely access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J. Joudrey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Zoe M. Adams
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Paxton Bach
- British Columbia Center on Substance Use, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Jessica A. Chaiton
- British Columbia Center on Substance Use, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Simeon D. Kimmel
- Sections of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Maxime Paquet
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Minhee Sung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven
| | - Melinda Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Jingxian Zhang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Emily A. Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - E. Jennifer Edelman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jones NR, Nielsen S, Farrell M, Ali R, Gill A, Larney S, Degenhardt L. Retention of opioid agonist treatment prescribers across New South Wales, Australia, 2001-2018: Implications for treatment systems and potential impact on client outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 219:108464. [PMID: 33360851 PMCID: PMC7855715 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been much research on the efficacy and effectiveness of opioid agonist treatment (OAT), but less on its implementation and sustainability. A challenge internationally has been recruiting and retaining prescribers. This paper aims to characterise the prescribers in terms of OAT prescribing behaviours. METHODS Retrospective cohort study in New South Wales, Australia. Participants were 2199 OAT prescribers between 1 st August 2001-19th September 2018.We examined trends in initiation and cessation of OAT prescribers. Adjusted hazard ratios were calculated to estimate prescriber retention, adjusting for year of initiation, practice type, client load and treatment prescribed. RESULTS The rate of prescribers ceasing OAT prescribing has been increasing over time: a prescriber who initiated between 2016-2017 had over four times the risk of cessation compared with one who initiated before 2001, AHR: 4.77; [3.67-6.21]. The highest prescriber cessation rate was in prescribers who had prescribed for shorter time periods. The annual percentage of prescribers who ceased prescribing among those who prescribed for ≤5 years increased from 3% in 2001 to 20 % in 2017. By 2017 more prescribers were discontinuing prescribing than new prescribers were starting. Approximately 87 % (n = 25,167) of OAT clients were under the care of 20 % of OAT prescribers (n = 202); half had been prescribing OAT for 17+ years. CONCLUSIONS OAT prescribing is increasingly concentrated in a small group of mature prescribers, and new prescribers are not being retained. There is a need to identify and respond to the reasons that contribute to newer prescribers to cease prescribing and put in place strategies to increase retention and broaden the base of doctors involved in such prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola R Jones
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Suzanne Nielsen
- Monash Addiction Research Centre and Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Michael Farrell
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Robert Ali
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Anthony Gill
- NSW Ministry of Health, Level 6, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia.
| | - Sarah Larney
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Canada.
| | - Louisa Degenhardt
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mayer S, Fowler A, Brohman I, Fairbairn N, Boyd J, Kerr T, McNeil R. Motivations to initiate injectable hydromorphone and diacetylmorphine treatment: A qualitative study of patient experiences in Vancouver, Canada. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2020; 85:102930. [PMID: 32949832 PMCID: PMC7901590 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Within the context of the ongoing overdose crisis and limitations of conventional opioid treatments, the scale-up of injectable hydromorphone (HDM) and diacetylmorphine (DAM) as evidenced-based treatments is currently underway in some settings in Canada. Past research has underscored the importance of treatment initiation in shaping onward treatment trajectories, however structural factors that influence participants' motivations to access injectable HDM or DAM have not been fully characterized. This study examines peoples' motivations for accessing HDM/DAM treatment and situates these within the social and structural context that shapes treatment delivery by employing the concept of structural vulnerability. METHODS Fifty-two individuals enrolled in injectable HDM/DAM programs were recruited from four community-based clinical programs in Vancouver, Canada to participate in qualitative semi-structured interviews. Approximately 50 h of ethnographic fieldwork was also completed in one clinical setting, and one-on-one with participants public spaces. Interview transcripts and ethnographic fieldnotes were analyzed through a structural vulnerability lens with a focus on treatment initiation. RESULTS Participants' previous experiences and perceptions of other drug treatments (e.g. methadone) foregrounded their initiation of injectable HDM/DAM. Social and structural factors (e.g. fentanyl-adulterated drug supply, poverty, drug criminalization) influenced participants' motivations to address immediate physical risks and their initial perception of this treatment's ability to align with their opioid use experiences. Similar social and structural factors that drive immediate physical risks, were also evidenced in participants' motivations to make changes in their daily lives and to address broader opioid use goals. CONCLUSION Participants descriptions of their motivations to initiate HDM/DAM highlight how structural vulnerabilities shaped participants' experiences initiating injectable HDM/DAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samara Mayer
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada
| | - Al Fowler
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada
| | - Isabella Brohman
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada
| | - Nadia Fairbairn
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Jade Boyd
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Thomas Kerr
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Ryan McNeil
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine. New Haven, CT, 06510 United States; Yale Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine. New Haven, Connecticut, 06510 United States.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Piske M, Zhou H, Min JE, Hongdilokkul N, Pearce LA, Homayra F, Socias ME, McGowan G, Nosyk B. The cascade of care for opioid use disorder: a retrospective study in British Columbia, Canada. Addiction 2020; 115:1482-1493. [PMID: 31899565 DOI: 10.1111/add.14947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The 'cascade of care' framework, measuring attrition at various stages of care engagement, has been proposed to guide the public health response to the opioid overdose public health emergency in British Columbia, Canada. We estimated the cascade of care for opioid use disorder and identified factors associated with care engagement for people with opioid use disorder (PWOUD) provincially. DESIGN Retrospective study using a provincial-level linkage of four health administrative databases. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS All PWOUD in BC from 1 January 1996 to 30 November 2017. MEASUREMENTS The eight-stage cascade of care included diagnosed PWOUD, ever on opioid agonist treatment (OAT), recently on OAT, currently on OAT and retained on OAT: ≥ 1, ≥ 3, ≥ 12 and ≥ 24 months). Health-care use, homelessness and other demographics were obtained from physician billing records, hospitalizations, and drug dispensation records. Receipt of income assistance was indicated by enrollment in Pharmacare Plan C. FINDINGS A total of 55 470 diagnosed PWOUD were alive at end of follow-up. As of 2017, a majority of the population (n = 39 456; 71%) received OAT during follow-up; however, only 33% (n = 18 519) were currently engaged in treatment and 16% (n = 8960) had been retained for at least 1 year. Compared with those never on OAT, those currently engaged in OAT were more likely to be aged under 45 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.64, 1.89], male (aOR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.64, 1.82), with concurrent substance use disorders (aOR = 2.56, 95% CI = 2.44, 2.70), hepatitis C virus (HCV) (aOR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.14, 1.33) and either homeless or receiving income-assistance (aOR = 4.35, 95% CI = 4.17, 4.55). Regular contact with the health-care system-either in out-patient or acute care settings-was common among PWOUD not engaged in OAT, regardless of time since diagnosis or treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS People with opioid use disorder in British Columbia, Canada show high levels of out-patient care prior to diagnosis. Younger age, male sex, urban residence, lower income level and homelessness appear to be independently associated with increased opioid agonist treatment engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah Piske
- BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Haoxuan Zhou
- BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jeong E Min
- BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - M Eugenia Socias
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gina McGowan
- British Columbia Ministry of Mental Health and Addictions, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Bohdan Nosyk
- BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
MacNeill L, Brunelle C, Skelding B, DiTommaso E. Experiences of Clients in Three Types of Methadone Maintenance Therapy in an Atlantic Canadian City: A Qualitative Study. Can J Nurs Res 2020; 53:211-221. [PMID: 32414293 DOI: 10.1177/0844562120924516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methadone maintenance therapy remains the most common form of substitution therapy for opioid use disorder in Canada. Effectiveness of methadone maintenance therapy has been established, but recently newer treatment delivery models have emerged. Differences across these treatment models have not been examined. PURPOSE This descriptive qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to assess client experiences in three methadone maintenance therapy treatment delivery models: (a) comprehensive programs, (b) low-threshold/high-tolerance programs, and (c) fee-for-service programs. METHODS A total of 32 participants were recruited from methadone maintenance therapy clinics in an Atlantic Canadian city and grouped into three models of care (na = 9, nb = 11, nc = 12). Content analysis was performed on interview data to assess the frequency of relevant themes in the data. RESULTS Participants from all groups stressed the importance of supportive staff and having access to some form of counselling. However, low-threshold/high-tolerance and fee-for-service clients voiced a need for more formal counselling and programming at their clinics. Methadone was reported as the most helpful aspect of the methadone maintenance therapy programs; however, participants also expressed negative views about the substance. CONCLUSIONS These findings have important implications for the development and implementation of methadone maintenance therapy, specifically pertaining to further integration of addiction and mental health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lillian MacNeill
- Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada
| | - Caroline Brunelle
- Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada
| | - Brittany Skelding
- Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada
| | - Enrico DiTommaso
- Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Donroe JH, Bhatraju EP, Tsui JI, Edelman EJ. Identification and Management of Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care: an Update. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2020; 22:23. [PMID: 32285215 DOI: 10.1007/s11920-020-01149-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The rising prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) and related complications in North America coupled with limited numbers of specialists in addiction medicine has led to large gaps in treatment. Primary care providers (PCPs) are ideally suited to diagnose and care for people with OUD and are increasingly being called upon to improve access to care. This review will highlight the recent literature pertaining to the care of patients with OUD by PCPs. RECENT FINDINGS The prevalence of patients with OUD in primary care practice is increasing, and models of office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) are evolving to meet local needs of both ambulatory practices and patients. OBOT has been shown to increase access to care and demonstrates comparable outcomes when compared to more specialty-driven care. OBOT is an effective means of increasing access to care for patients with OUD. The ideal structure of OBOT depends on local factors. Future research must explore ways to increase the identification and diagnosis of patients with OUD, improve treatment retention rates, reduce stigma, and promote interdisciplinary approaches to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph H Donroe
- Yale School of Medicine, 1450 Chapel Street, Office MOB211, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
| | | | - Judith I Tsui
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - E Jennifer Edelman
- Yale School of Medicine, 1450 Chapel Street, Office MOB211, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.,Yale Schools of Medicine and Public Health, E.S. Harkness Memorial Hall, Building A, 367 Cedar Street, Ste Suite 401, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
MacNeill L, Brunelle C, DiTommaso E, Skelding B. Client characteristics and substance use patterns in different models of methadone maintenance therapy (MMT). JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2019.1704083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lillian MacNeill
- Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada
| | - Caroline Brunelle
- Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada
| | - Enrico DiTommaso
- Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada
| | - Brittany Skelding
- Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kronfli N, Buxton JA, Jennings L, Kouyoumdjian F, Wong A. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) care in Canadian correctional facilities: Where are we and where do we need to be? CANADIAN LIVER JOURNAL 2019; 2:171-183. [PMID: 35992759 PMCID: PMC9202815 DOI: 10.3138/canlivj.2019-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 25% of people in Canadian correctional facilities have been previously exposed to hepatitis C virus (HCV). Despite being a high-prevalence setting, most Canadian prisons have thus far failed to engage the majority of those with chronic HCV infection in care. Several factors, including the lack of systematic screening programs, lack of on-site and trained health care personnel to improve access to care and treatment during incarceration, and the absence of standardized procedures needed to facilitate linkage to care following release likely contribute to poor engagement along the HCV care cascade for people in prison. HCV screening and engagement in care for people in prison can be improved through the implementation of universal opt-out screening upon admission and consideration of multidisciplinary care models for the provision of care. As well, the dissemination of prison-based needle and syringe programs to avert new HCV infections and re-infections should be considered. To meet the World Health Organization (WHO) 2030 HCV elimination goals, engaging researchers, clinicians and other health care providers, policy makers, correctional officials, and members of community in dialogue will be an essential first step going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Kronfli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jane A Buxton
- BC Centre of Disease Control and School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lindsay Jennings
- Prisoners with HIV/AIDS Support Action Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona Kouyoumdjian
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander Wong
- Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Priest KC, Gorfinkel L, Klimas J, Jones AA, Fairbairn N, McCarty D. Comparing Canadian and United States opioid agonist therapy policies. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2019; 74:257-265. [PMID: 30765118 PMCID: PMC6689455 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2018] [Revised: 12/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Canada and the United States (U.S.) face an opioid use disorder (OUD) and opioid overdose epidemic. The most effective OUD treatment is opioid agonist therapy (OAT)-buprenorphine (with and without naloxone) and methadone. Although federal approval for OAT occurred decades ago, in both countries, access to and use of OAT is low. Restrictive policies and complex regulations contribute to limited OAT access. Through a non-systematic literature scan and a review of publicly available policy documents, we examined and compared OAT policies and practice at the federal (Canada vs. U.S.) and local levels (British Columbia [B.C.] vs. Oregon). Differences and similarities were noted between federal and local OAT policies, and subsequently OAT access. In Canada, OAT policy control has shifted from federal to provincial authorities. Conversely, in the U.S., federal authorities maintain primary control of OAT regulations. Local OAT health insurance coverage policies were substantively different between B.C. and Oregon. In B.C., five OAT options were available, while in Oregon, only two OAT options were available with administrative limitations. The differences in local OAT access and coverage policies between B.C. and Oregon, may be explained, in part, to the differences in Canadian and U.S. federal OAT policies, specifically, the relaxation of special federal OAT regulatory controls in Canada. The analysis also highlights the complicating contributions, and likely policy solutions, that exist within other drug policy sub-domains (e.g., the prescription regime, and drug control regime) and broader policy domains (e.g., constitutional rights). U.S. policymakers and health officials could consider adopting Canada's regulatory policy approach to expand OAT access to mitigate the harms of the ongoing opioid overdose epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey C Priest
- Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) and Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, 97239, USA; MD/PhD Program, School of Medicine, OHSU, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Lauren Gorfinkel
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Jan Klimas
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Andrea A Jones
- Department of Psychiatry, UBC, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Nadia Fairbairn
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Department of Medicine, UBC, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Dennis McCarty
- Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) and Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, 97239, USA; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, OHSU, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jacka B, Larney S, Degenhardt L, Janjua N, Høj S, Krajden M, Grebely J, Bruneau J. Prevalence of Injecting Drug Use and Coverage of Interventions to Prevent HIV and Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among People Who Inject Drugs in Canada. Am J Public Health 2019; 110:45-50. [PMID: 31725310 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2019.305379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Objectives. To determine the number of people who inject drugs (PWID) in Canada and the annual coverage of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) and needle-and-syringe provision for PWID.Methods. We estimated the number of PWID in 11 of 13 Canadian provinces and territories in 2011 by using indirect multiplier methods based on provincial and territorial methadone recipient totals and proportion of surveyed PWID receiving methadone. We modeled annual increases for 2011 to 2016 on Quebec and British Columbia longitudinal data. We calculated needle-and-syringe coverage (World Health Organization [WHO] recommendation: ≥ 200 per PWID) and OAT coverage (WHO recommendation: ≥ 40 per 100 PWID) per province and territory annually.Results. An estimated 130 000 individuals in Canada (0.55%) injected drugs in 2011, increasing to 171 900 individuals (0.70%) in 2016. Needle-and-syringe coverage increased from 193 to 291 per PWID, and OAT coverage increased from 55 to 66 per 100 PWID over the study period.Conclusions. While the number of PWID increased between 2011 and 2016, OAT coverage remained high, and needle-and-syringe coverage generally improved over time.Public Health Implications. These data will inform public health surveillance, service planning, and resource allocation, and assist monitoring of treatment and harm-reduction coverage outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Jacka
- Brendan Jacka, Stine Hoj, and Julie Bruneau are with Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada. Sarah Larney and Louisa Degenhardt are with National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia. Naveed Janjua and Mel Krajden are with British Columbia Centres for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Jason Grebely is with The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney
| | - Sarah Larney
- Brendan Jacka, Stine Hoj, and Julie Bruneau are with Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada. Sarah Larney and Louisa Degenhardt are with National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia. Naveed Janjua and Mel Krajden are with British Columbia Centres for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Jason Grebely is with The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney
| | - Louisa Degenhardt
- Brendan Jacka, Stine Hoj, and Julie Bruneau are with Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada. Sarah Larney and Louisa Degenhardt are with National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia. Naveed Janjua and Mel Krajden are with British Columbia Centres for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Jason Grebely is with The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney
| | - Naveed Janjua
- Brendan Jacka, Stine Hoj, and Julie Bruneau are with Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada. Sarah Larney and Louisa Degenhardt are with National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia. Naveed Janjua and Mel Krajden are with British Columbia Centres for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Jason Grebely is with The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney
| | - Stine Høj
- Brendan Jacka, Stine Hoj, and Julie Bruneau are with Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada. Sarah Larney and Louisa Degenhardt are with National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia. Naveed Janjua and Mel Krajden are with British Columbia Centres for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Jason Grebely is with The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney
| | - Mel Krajden
- Brendan Jacka, Stine Hoj, and Julie Bruneau are with Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada. Sarah Larney and Louisa Degenhardt are with National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia. Naveed Janjua and Mel Krajden are with British Columbia Centres for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Jason Grebely is with The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney
| | - Jason Grebely
- Brendan Jacka, Stine Hoj, and Julie Bruneau are with Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada. Sarah Larney and Louisa Degenhardt are with National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia. Naveed Janjua and Mel Krajden are with British Columbia Centres for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Jason Grebely is with The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney
| | - Julie Bruneau
- Brendan Jacka, Stine Hoj, and Julie Bruneau are with Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada. Sarah Larney and Louisa Degenhardt are with National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia. Naveed Janjua and Mel Krajden are with British Columbia Centres for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Jason Grebely is with The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Allen B, Nolan ML, Paone D. Underutilization of medications to treat opioid use disorder: What role does stigma play? Subst Abus 2019; 40:459-465. [DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1640833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bennett Allen
- aNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Use Prevention, Care, and Treatment Queens, Queens, New York, USA
| | - Michelle L. Nolan
- aNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Use Prevention, Care, and Treatment Queens, Queens, New York, USA
| | - Denise Paone
- aNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Use Prevention, Care, and Treatment Queens, Queens, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mohd Salleh NA, Fairbairn N, Nolan S, Barrios R, Shoveller J, Richardson L, Milloy MJ. Dispensation of antiretroviral therapy and methadone maintenance therapy at the same facility in a low-barrier setting linked to optimal adherence to HIV treatment. HIV Med 2019; 20:606-614. [PMID: 31359615 DOI: 10.1111/hiv.12777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to examine the association between dispensation of methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) and antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the same facility, across multiple low-barrier dispensing outlets, and achieving optimal adherence to ART among people who use illicit drugs (PWUD). METHODS We used data from the AIDS Care Cohort to Evaluate Exposure to Survival Services (ACCESS) study, a long-running study of a community-recruited cohort of HIV-positive PWUD, linked to comprehensive HIV clinical records in Vancouver, Canada, a setting of no-cost, universal access to HIV care. The longitudinal relationship between MMT-ART dispensation at the same facility and the odds of ≥ 95% ART adherence was analysed using multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects modelling. We conducted a further analysis using a marginal structural mode with inverse probability of treatment weights as a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS This study included data on 1690 interviews of 345 ART- and MMT-exposed participants carried out between June 2012 and December 2017. In the final multivariable model, MMT-ART dispensation, compared with nondispensation at the same facility, was associated with greater odds of achieving ≥ 95% adherence [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.96]. A marginal structural model estimated a 1.48 (95% CI 1.15-1.80) greater odds of ≥ 95% adherence among participants who reported MMT-ART dispensation at the same facility compared with those who did not. CONCLUSIONS The odds of achieving optimal adherence to ART were 56% higher during periods in which MMT and ART medications were dispensed at the same facility, in a low-barrier setting. Our findings highlight the need to consider a simpler integrated approach with medication dispensation at the same facility in low-threshold settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Mohd Salleh
- Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - N Fairbairn
- BC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - S Nolan
- BC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - R Barrios
- BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - J Shoveller
- BC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - L Richardson
- BC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - M-J Milloy
- BC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bruneau J, Ahamad K, Goyer MÈ, Poulin G, Selby P, Fischer B, Wild TC, Wood E. Management of opioid use disorders: a national clinical practice guideline. CMAJ 2019; 190:E247-E257. [PMID: 29507156 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Bruneau
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Bruneau), Université de Montréal; Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence (Bruneau, Goyer), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Ahamad), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Family Medicine (Ahamad), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Centre de recherche et d'aide pour narcomanes, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (Goyer), Montréal, Que.; Addictions Foundation of Manitoba (Poulin); Max Rady College of Medicine, Postgraduate Medical Education (Poulin), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Addictions Division (Selby), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Selby); Department of Psychiatry (Selby, Fischer), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (Fischer), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont.; School of Public Health (Wild), Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Wood), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Medicine (Wood), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Keith Ahamad
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Bruneau), Université de Montréal; Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence (Bruneau, Goyer), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Ahamad), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Family Medicine (Ahamad), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Centre de recherche et d'aide pour narcomanes, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (Goyer), Montréal, Que.; Addictions Foundation of Manitoba (Poulin); Max Rady College of Medicine, Postgraduate Medical Education (Poulin), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Addictions Division (Selby), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Selby); Department of Psychiatry (Selby, Fischer), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (Fischer), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont.; School of Public Health (Wild), Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Wood), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Medicine (Wood), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Marie-Ève Goyer
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Bruneau), Université de Montréal; Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence (Bruneau, Goyer), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Ahamad), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Family Medicine (Ahamad), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Centre de recherche et d'aide pour narcomanes, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (Goyer), Montréal, Que.; Addictions Foundation of Manitoba (Poulin); Max Rady College of Medicine, Postgraduate Medical Education (Poulin), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Addictions Division (Selby), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Selby); Department of Psychiatry (Selby, Fischer), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (Fischer), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont.; School of Public Health (Wild), Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Wood), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Medicine (Wood), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Ginette Poulin
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Bruneau), Université de Montréal; Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence (Bruneau, Goyer), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Ahamad), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Family Medicine (Ahamad), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Centre de recherche et d'aide pour narcomanes, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (Goyer), Montréal, Que.; Addictions Foundation of Manitoba (Poulin); Max Rady College of Medicine, Postgraduate Medical Education (Poulin), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Addictions Division (Selby), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Selby); Department of Psychiatry (Selby, Fischer), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (Fischer), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont.; School of Public Health (Wild), Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Wood), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Medicine (Wood), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Peter Selby
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Bruneau), Université de Montréal; Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence (Bruneau, Goyer), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Ahamad), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Family Medicine (Ahamad), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Centre de recherche et d'aide pour narcomanes, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (Goyer), Montréal, Que.; Addictions Foundation of Manitoba (Poulin); Max Rady College of Medicine, Postgraduate Medical Education (Poulin), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Addictions Division (Selby), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Selby); Department of Psychiatry (Selby, Fischer), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (Fischer), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont.; School of Public Health (Wild), Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Wood), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Medicine (Wood), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Benedikt Fischer
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Bruneau), Université de Montréal; Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence (Bruneau, Goyer), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Ahamad), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Family Medicine (Ahamad), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Centre de recherche et d'aide pour narcomanes, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (Goyer), Montréal, Que.; Addictions Foundation of Manitoba (Poulin); Max Rady College of Medicine, Postgraduate Medical Education (Poulin), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Addictions Division (Selby), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Selby); Department of Psychiatry (Selby, Fischer), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (Fischer), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont.; School of Public Health (Wild), Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Wood), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Medicine (Wood), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - T Cameron Wild
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Bruneau), Université de Montréal; Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence (Bruneau, Goyer), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Ahamad), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Family Medicine (Ahamad), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Centre de recherche et d'aide pour narcomanes, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (Goyer), Montréal, Que.; Addictions Foundation of Manitoba (Poulin); Max Rady College of Medicine, Postgraduate Medical Education (Poulin), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Addictions Division (Selby), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Selby); Department of Psychiatry (Selby, Fischer), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (Fischer), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont.; School of Public Health (Wild), Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Wood), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Medicine (Wood), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Evan Wood
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Bruneau), Université de Montréal; Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence (Bruneau, Goyer), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Ahamad), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Family Medicine (Ahamad), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Centre de recherche et d'aide pour narcomanes, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (Goyer), Montréal, Que.; Addictions Foundation of Manitoba (Poulin); Max Rady College of Medicine, Postgraduate Medical Education (Poulin), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Addictions Division (Selby), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Selby); Department of Psychiatry (Selby, Fischer), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research (Fischer), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont.; School of Public Health (Wild), Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (Wood), St. Paul's Hospital; Department of Medicine (Wood), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | | |
Collapse
|