Pilot Outcomes of a Multicomponent Fall Risk Program Integrated Into Daily Lives of Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Perceived Facilitators and Barriers, From the Perspective of Users, of a Multicomponent Intervention in Older People Using an Asynchronous Telehealth Modality During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Research

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted multicomponent face-to-face interventions with older people, which became an opportunity for the implementation of these interventions in telehealth modality, as well as the analysis of the facilitators and barriers. This qualitative study examines the facilitators and barriers, from the users' perspective, of a promotional-preventive multicomponent intervention in older people using an asynchronous telehealth modality during the COVID-19 pandemic, as a continuation of the face-to-face intervention. Methods: Semistructured in-depth interviews were used. An intentional sampling was conducted over eight groups of older people in a city, who were part of a multicomponent (physical activity, cognitive stimulation, and education) telehealth (videos, infographics, manual, and WhatsApp) promotional-preventive intervention, who came from the same face-to-face intervention. After intervention, two groups were identified (intervention and control). Telephone interviews, until theoretical saturation was reached, were audio-recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti. Results: Twenty-six older people of both sexes, aged 60-88 years, were interviewed (14 intervened and 12 controls). Six themes were identified: positive aspects of telehealth, telehealth facilitators, preference for face-to-face modality over telehealth modality, telehealth barriers, reasons for not performing telehealth, and coping strategies in the pandemic: specifically, as facilitators, participating in the company of others, having participated in the same intervention previously (face-to-face modality), good knowledge of digital literacy, self-motivation, commitment to the program, and the emergence of innate leaders, and as barriers, pain during physical activity, complexity of cognitive exercises included in cognitive stimulation, poor digital literacy, and not having support from others. Conclusion: This is the first qualitative study that identifies facilitators and barriers of a multicomponent intervention in an asynchronous telehealth modality, as a continuation of the same face-to-face intervention. The asynchronous telehealth modality could be used regularly with older people in rural areas, in situations of disability and/or with care needs, pandemic scenarios, or natural disasters.

Psychoeducation for fall prevention among community-dwelling older people: A scoping review

Community-dwelling older people (CDOP) face important risks of falling, a leading cause of chronic pain and transitions into long-term disability. While exercise-based interventions are widely studied for fall prevention, psychoeducation may play an important preventive role. Nevertheless, psychoeducation for fall prevention remains underexplored. This study aimed to describe existing psychoeducation for fall prevention among CDOP, identify its key components, and derive recommendations to inform future interventions. Using a scoping review design, we selected 20 studies with focus on psychoeducation for fall prevention. Findings revealed that all selected studies incorporated at least one of the four psychoeducation elements described by Anderson et al. Key aspects including mode of delivery, intervention facilitator, and educational resources are described, but literature lacks convergence. Moreover, theory-based psychoeducation programs and integration of technology and interactive delivery methods are underexplored. Implications for the design of a psychoeducation program for fall prevention in CDOP are discussed.

Is functional training functional? a systematic review of its effects in community-dwelling older adults

BACKGROUND

Age-related decline in physical and cognitive capacity increases older adults' risk of disability, long-term care placement, and mortality rate. Functional training, which uses activities of daily living or simulated movements to complete activities as the intervention medium, could be more effective than rote exercise, which uses repetitive movements without added purpose, in preventing late-life disability in older people. With a growing number of studies in this area, systematically studying the effect of functional training is needed. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effects of functional training on the outcomes of activities of daily living, physical functioning, and cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

Literature published between January 2010 and April 2024 in 10 electronic databases were searched and screened. This timeframe was established to include studies published within the last 15 years. Each identified article was screened and reviewed by two authors independently. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the PEDro Scale. Key findings were synthesized according to participants' characteristics and intervention types.

RESULTS

The review included 32 studies. In the general community-dwelling older adult population (20 studies), studies that applied functional training as a single-component approach showed a positive effect on activities of daily living. However, the training effect on balance and mobility was not superior to that of other exercise programs. Moreover, the effect was mixed when functional training was combined with other intervention components. In older adults with mild cognitive impairment (5 studies), Simulated Functional Tasks Exercise, a single-component training, consistently demonstrated positive effects on the activities of daily living and cognitive functions. In older adults with dementia (4 studies) or frailty (3 studies), the effect was mixed across the single- and multi-component approaches.

CONCLUSION

Functional training alone is effective in preventing late-life disability in general community-dwelling older adults. When training activities challenge both motor and cognitive abilities, the effect seems to improve the performance of activities of daily living and cognitive functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Additional studies of functional training in older adults with cognitive impairment or frailty are recommended.

Addressing Biomechanical Errors in the Back Squat for Older Adults: A Clinical Perspective for Maintaining Neutral Spine and Knee Alignment

Background/Objectives: Falls pose a significant health risk for older adults, often due to balance disorders and decreased mobility. Methods: The ability to perform sit-to-stand transfers, which involve squatting, is crucial for daily independence. Incorporating squats into exercise routines can enhance lower body strength, reduce fall risk, and improve overall quality of life. Results: While the back squat is beneficial, proper form is essential to avoid biomechanical errors, like lumbar hyperlordosis and knee valgus. Conclusions: Health and fitness professionals, such as physical therapists and/or clinical exercise physiologists, should carefully guide older adults in performing the back squat, addressing any functional deficits, and ensuring proper technique to minimize the risk of injury and maximize the benefits.

Feasibility of a Multi-Component Strengths-Building Intervention for Caregivers of Persons With Heart Failure

Caregivers of persons with heart failure (HF) navigate complex care plans, yet support strategies often focus solely on meeting the needs of patients. We conducted a randomized waitlist control trial (N = 38) to test the feasibility and gauge initial effect size of the Caregiver Support intervention on quality of life, caregiver burden, and self-efficacy among HF caregivers. The intervention includes up to five remote, nurse-facilitated sessions. Components address: holistic caregiver assessment, life purpose, action planning, resources, and future planning. Caregivers were 93.3% female, 60% White, and 63.3% spouses. Average age was 59.4. Participants who completed the intervention reported high satisfaction and acceptability of activities. Between-group effect sizes at 16 and 32 weeks suggest improvement in quality of life (mental health) (.88; 1.08), caregiver burden (.31; .37), and self-efficacy (.63; .74). Caregivers found Caregiver Support acceptable and feasible. Findings contribute evidence that this intervention can enhance caregiver outcomes. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT04090749.

Multicomponent Training in Progressive Phases Improves Functional Capacity, Physical Capacity, Quality of Life, and Exercise Motivation in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a multicomponent progressive training program (MPTP) on functionality, quality of life (QoL) and motivation to exercise (EM) in a group of older adults (OA) of a community.

METHODS

A total of 55 participants of 69.42 ± 6.01 years of age were randomized into two groups; experimental (EG:35) and control (CG:20), and subjected to 27 weeks of MPTP. Functionality (pre/post-intervention) was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Time Up and Go (TUG), Walking While Talking Test (WWT), Manual Dynamometry (MD), Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV₁), Sit and Reach (SR), Back Scratch (BS), and walk for 2 min (2 mST). QoL was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire and EM using the BREQ-3. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests were applied. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was applied. A significance level of p < 0.05 was accepted for all comparisons.

RESULTS

The EG compared to the CG improved in SPPB (ΔEG/CG: 29.67%/p < 0.001), TUG (ΔEG/CG: 35.70%/p < 0.05), WWT (ΔEG/CG: 42.93%/p < 0.001), MD (ΔEG/CG: 20.40%/p < 0.05), FEV₁ (ΔEG/CG: 21.37%/p < 0.05), BS (ΔEG/CG: 80.34%/p < 0.05), 2 mST (ΔEG/CG: 33.02%/p < 0.05), SF-36 (ΔEG/CG: 13.85%/p < 0.001), and Intrinsic Regulation (ΔEG/CG: 27.97%/p < 0.001); Identified by regulation (ΔEG/CG: 9.29%/p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

An MPTP improves functionality, QoL and EM, and is a safe and effective method for community OAs.

The Effect of Individualized Fall Prevention Programs on Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review

An alarming rate of injurious falls among older adults warrants proactive measures to reduce falls and fall risk. The purpose of this article was to examine and synthesize the literature as it relates to programmatic components and clinical outcomes of individualized fall prevention programs on community-dwelling older adults. A literature search of four databases was performed using search strategies and terms unique to each database. Title, abstract, and full article reviews were performed to assure inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. Data were analyzed for type of study, program providers, interventions and strategies used to deliver the program, assessments used, and statistically significant outcomes. Queries resulted in 410 articles and 32 met all inclusion criteria (19 controlled trials and 13 quasi-experimental). Physical therapists were part of the provider team in 23 (72%) studies and the only provider in 10 (31%). There was substantial heterogeneity in procedures and outcome measures. Most common procedures were balance assessments (n=30), individualized balance exercises (n=29), cognition (n=21), home and vision assessments (n=16), specific educational modules (n=15), referrals to other providers/community programs (n=8), and motivational interviewing (n=7). Frequency of falls improved for eight of 13 (61.5%) controlled trials and four of five (80%) quasi-experimental studies. Balance and function improved in six of 11 (54.5%) controlled trials and in each of the six (100%) quasi-experimental studies. Strength improved in three of seven (43%) controlled trials and four of five (75%) quasi-experimental studies. While many programs improved falls and balance of older adults, there was no conclusive evidence as to which assessments and interventions were optimal to deliver as individualized fall prevention programming. The skill of a physical therapist and measures of fall frequency, balance, and function were common among the majority of studies reviewed. Despite the variability among programs, there is emerging evidence that individualized, multimodal fall prevention programs may improve fall risk of community-dwelling older adults and convenient access to these programs should be emphasized.

The Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (LiFE) program and its modifications: a narrative review

Lifestyle-integrated exercise is a promising approach to increase adherence levels of older adults compared to structured exercise programs as it saves time and effort and supports older adults in preventing falls and functional decline. The Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (LiFE) program embodies this approach by integrating physical activity, balance, and strength activities into daily tasks of community-dwelling older adults aged 70+. A randomized controlled trial shows strong effectiveness of the original, resource-intensive one-on-one format of the LiFE program in terms of reducing falls, improving motor performance, and increasing physical activity. The positive effects of the original LiFE program have yet stimulated adaptions to group-based and information and communications technology-based formats, to younger seniors, for multicomponent interventions, and to populations with disabilities which resulted in 16 known studies about LiFE modifications. Evidence for the effectiveness of specific LiFE modifications exists for four programs, while seven adaptions are in the feasibility stage and one is still in the early development phase. A decade of existing LiFE research is summarized in this narrative review that, to the best of our knowledge, does not exist until now. The aim of this article is (1) to provide an overview of the number of LiFE modifications and their specifications, (2) to describe the current evidence regarding feasibility and effectiveness, and (3) to present challenges and potential of the different LiFE modifications. All adaptions of the LiFE program embody the benefits of the lifestyle-integrated approach and enable an enhancement of the successful LiFE concept.