Early Tracheostomy for Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury is Associated with Reduced Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay and Total Ventilator Days

An update on pediatric traumatic brain injury

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains the commonest neurological and neurosurgical cause of death and survivor disability among children and young adults. This review summarizes some of the important recent publications that have added to our understanding of the condition and advanced clinical practice.

METHODS

Targeted review of the literature on various aspects of paediatric TBI over the last 5 years.

RESULTS

Recent literature has provided new insights into the burden of paediatric TBI and patient outcome across geographical divides and the severity spectrum. Although CT scans remain a standard, rapid sequence MRI without sedation has been increasingly used in the frontline. Advanced MRI sequences are also being used to better understand pathology and to improve prognostication. Various initiatives in paediatric and adult TBI have contributed regionally and internationally to harmonising research efforts in mild and severe TBI. Emerging data on advanced brain monitoring from paediatric studies and extrapolated from adult studies continues to slowly advance our understanding of its role. There has been growing interest in non-invasive monitoring, although the clinical applications remain somewhat unclear. Contributions of the first large scale comparative effectiveness trial have advanced knowledge, especially for the use of hyperosmolar therapies and cerebrospinal fluid drainage in severe paediatric TBI. Finally, the growth of large and even global networks is a welcome development that addresses the limitations of small sample size and generalizability typical of single-centre studies.

CONCLUSION

Publications in recent years have contributed iteratively to progress in understanding paediatric TBI and how best to manage patients.

Early Tracheostomy and Outcomes in Ventilated Pediatric Trauma Patients

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of pediatric ventilated patients who underwent early tracheostomy. Our hypothesis is early tracheostomy will be associated with less ventilator days, Intensive care (ICU) days and hospital days.

METHODS

The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database of the calendar year 2017 through 2019 was used for the study. All pediatric trauma patients ≤17 years who were admitted to the hospital and were placed on mechanical ventilation were included in the study. Other variables included patients' demography, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, types of procedure that were performed for hemorrhage control. Propensity score matching analysis was performed between the early (≤7 days) and late tracheostomy (>7 days) groups. The primary outcome of the study was total hospital length of stay. Other outcomes were ICU days, ventilator days.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching created 643 pairs of patients. The median age (years [interquartile range]) of the patient was 14 [8-16]. Most patients suffered from severe injuries with a median ISS 29 [22-38] and GCS score was 3 [3-8]. There was no significant difference identified between the early and the late groups, in hospital stay (24 [23, 26] vs. 24 [23, 26], P = 0.5), ICU days (14 [9-22] vs. 16 [9-23], P = 0.073) and ventilator days (10 [6-17] vs. 11 [7-18], P = 0.068). The incidence of pneumonia between the groups was (8.7% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.347).

CONCLUSION

Early tracheostomy failed to show any outcomes benefit in ventilated pediatric trauma patients.

Variation in tracheostomy placement and outcomes following pediatric trauma among adult, pediatric, and combined trauma centers

BACKGROUND

Tracheostomy placement is much more common in adults than children following severe trauma. We evaluated whether tracheostomy rates and outcomes differ for pediatric patients treated at trauma centers that primarily care for children versus adults.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients younger than 18 years in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2007 to 2016 treated at a Level I/II pediatric, adult, or combined adult/pediatric trauma center, ventilated >24 hours, and who survived to discharge. We used multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, insurance, injury mechanism and body region, and Injury Severity Score to estimate the association between the three trauma center types and tracheostomy. We used augmented inverse probability weighting to model the likelihood of tracheostomy based on the propensity for treatment at a pediatric, adult, or combined trauma center, and estimated associations between trauma center type with length of stay and postdischarge care.

RESULTS

Among 33,602 children, tracheostomies were performed in 4.2% of children in pediatric centers, 7.8% in combined centers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.81), and 11.2% in adult centers (aOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.48-2.22). After propensity matching, the estimated average tracheostomy rate would be 62.9% higher (95% CI, 37.7-88.1%) at combined centers and 85.3% higher (56.6-113.9%) at adult centers relative to pediatric centers. Tracheostomy patients had longer hospital stay in pediatric centers than combined (-4.4 days, -7.4 to -1.3 days) or adult (-4.0 days, -7.2 to -0.9 days) centers, but fewer children required postdischarge inpatient care (70.1% pediatric vs. 81.3% combined [aOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.03-4.31] and 82.4% adult centers [aOR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.31-4.83]).

CONCLUSION

Children treated at pediatric trauma centers have lower likelihood of tracheostomy than children treated at combined adult/pediatric or adult centers independent of patient or injury characteristics. Better understanding of optimal indications for tracheostomy is necessary to improve processes of care for children treated throughout the pediatric trauma system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Child Opportunity Index and Hospital Utilization in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury Admitted to the PICU

The need to understand how Community-based disparities impact morbidity and mortality in pediatric critical illness, such as traumatic brain injury. Test the hypothesis that ZIP code-based disparities in hospital utilization, including length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs, exist in a cohort of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to a PICU using the Child Opportunity Index (COI).

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database.

PATIENTS

Children 0-18 years old admitted to a PHIS hospital with a diagnosis of TBI from January 2016 to December 2020 requiring PICU care. To identify the most severely injured children, a study-specific definition of "Complicated TBI" was created based on radiology, pharmacy, and procedure codes.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Using nationally normed ZIP code-level COI data, patients were categorized into COI quintiles. A low COI ZIP code has low childhood opportunity based on weighted indicators within educational, health and environmental, and social and economic domains. Population-averaged generalized estimating equation (GEE) models, adjusted for patient and clinical characteristics examined the association between COI and study outcomes, including hospital LOS and accrued hospital costs. The median age of this cohort of 8,055 children was 58 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8-145 mo). There were differences in patient demographics and rates of Complicated TBI between COI levels. The median hospital LOS was 3.0 days (IQR, 2.0-6.0 d) and in population-averaged GEE models, children living in very low COI ZIP codes were expected to have a hospital LOS 10.2% (95% CI, 4.1-16.8%; p = 0.0142) longer than children living in very high COI ZIP codes. For the 11% of children with a Complicated TBI, the relationship between COI and LOS was lost in multivariable models. COI level was not predictive of accrued hospital costs in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with TBI requiring PICU care living in low-opportunity ZIP codes have higher injury severity and longer hospital LOS compared with children living in higher-opportunity ZIP codes. Additional studies are needed to understand why these differences exist.

Effect of tracheostomy timing in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a prevalent cause of disability and death in the pediatric population, often requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Patients with significant TBI or intracranial hemorrhage require advanced airway management to protect against aspiration, hypoxia, and hypercarbia, eventually necessitating tracheostomy. While tracheostomy is much less common in children compared to adults, its prevalence among pediatric populations has been steadily increasing. Although early tracheostomy has demonstrated improved outcomes in adult patients, optimal tracheostomy timing in the pediatric population with TBI remains to be definitively established.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective cohort analysis aims to evaluate pediatric TBI patients who undergo tracheostomy and to investigate the impact of tracheostomy timing on outcomes.

DESIGN/METHODS

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Database (KID), collected between in 2016 and 2019, was queried using International Classification of Disease 10th edition (ICD10) codes for patients with traumatic brain injury who had received a tracheostomy. Baseline demographics, insurance status, and procedural day data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Propensity score matching was performed to estimate the incidence of medical complications and mortality related to early versus late tracheostomy timing (as defined by median = 9 days).

RESULTS

Of the 68,793 patients (mean age = 14, IQR 4-18) who suffered a TBI, 1,956 (2.8%) received a tracheostomy during their hospital stay. TBI patients who were tracheostomized were older (mean age = 16.5 vs 11.4 years), more likely to have injuries classified as severe TBIs and more likely to have accumulated more than one indicator of parenchymal injury as measured by the Composite Stroke Severity Scale (CSSS >1) than non-tracheostomized TBI patients. TBI patients with a tracheostomy were more likely to encounter serious complications such as sepsis, acute kidney injury (AKI), meningitis, or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). They were also more likely to necessitate an external ventricular drain (EVD) or decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) than TBI patients without a tracheostomy. Tracheostomy was also negatively associated with routine discharge. Procedural timing was assessed in 1,867 patients; older children (age >15 years) were more likely to undergo earlier placements (p < 0.001). Propensity score matching (PSM) comparing early versus late placement was completed by controlling for age, gender, and TBI severity. Those who were subjected to late tracheostomy (>9 days) were more likely to face complications such as AKI or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as well as a host of respiratory conditions such as pulmonary embolism, aspiration pneumonitis, pneumonia, or ARDS. While the timing did not significantly impact mortality across the PSM cohorts, late tracheostomy was associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and ventilator dependence.

CONCLUSIONS

Tracheostomy, while necessary for some patients who have sustained a TBI, is itself associated with several risks that should be assessed in context of each individual patient's overall condition. Additionally, the timing of the intervention may significantly impact the trajectory of the patient's recovery. Early intervention may reduce the incidence of serious complications as well as length of stay and dependence on a ventilator and facilitate a timelier recovery.

Timing of Tracheostomy in Patients with Intracerebral Haemorrhage: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

AIMS

Although early tracheostomy (ET) is recommended for patients with severe stroke, the optimal timing of tracheostomy for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics, risk factors and timing of tracheostomy in patients after tracheal intubation using a propensity-matched analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective database search and assessed 267 consecutive patients who underwent endotracheal intubation (175 of whom underwent tracheostomy) and ICH between July 2017 and June 2021. A logistic regression model was applied to identify the critical factors influencing the decision for tracheostomy by comparing factors in a tracheostomy group and a nontracheostomy group. Patients were divided into an early (≤5 days) or a late (>5 days) group according to the median time of tracheostomy. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for possible confounders and investigate differences in outcomes between ET and late tracheostomy (LT).

RESULTS

Among the 267 enrolled patients with ICH and endotracheal intubation, 65.5% received tracheostomy during hospitalisation, and 52.6% received ET. The independent risk factors for tracheostomy included National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.179; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.028-1.351; P = 0.018), aspiration (OR: 2.171; 95% CI: 1.054-4.471; P = 0.035) and infiltrates (OR: 2.149; 95% CI: 1.088-4.242; P = 0.028). Using propensity matching, we found that ET was associated with fewer antibiotic-using days (15 vs. 18; P < 0.001) and sedativeusing days (6 vs. 8; P < 0.001), shorter intensive care unit (ICU) Length of Study (LOS) (9 vs. 12; P < 0.05) and reduced in-ICU costs (3.59 vs. 7.4; P < 0.001) and total hospital costs (8.26 vs. 11.28, respectively; P < 0.001). Muscle relaxants (31.8% vs. 60.6%) were used less frequently in patients with ET (P = 0.001). However, there were no differences between the ET and LT groups in terms of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (4 vs. 4; P = 0.932), in-general-ward costs (4.74 vs. 4.37; P = 0.052), mechanical ventilation days (6 vs. 6; P = 0.961) and hospital LOS (23 vs. 23; P = 0.735) as well as the incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia (28.8% vs. 37.9%; P = 0.268), tracheostomyrelated complications (16.7% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.652), respiratory failure (24.2% vs. 31.8%; P = 0.333), all-cause deaths (15.2% vs. 16.7%; P = 0.812) and pneumonia (77.3% vs. 87.9%; P = 0.108).

CONCLUSION

We recommend ET for high-risk patients with ICH. Although ET cannot reduce inhospital mortality or improve patient prognosis, it may help reduce hospital costs and ICU LOS as well as the use of antibiotics, sedatives and muscle relaxants.

Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate current practices of tracheostomy in children regarding the ideal timing of tracheostomy placement, complications, indications, mortality, and success in decannulation.

SOURCE OF DATA

The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and complemented by manual search. The guidelines of PRISMA and MOOSE were applied. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Information extracted included patients' characteristics, outcomes, time to tracheostomy, and associated complications. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were computed using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

SYNTHESIS OF DATA

Sixty-six articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and 8 were included in the meta-analysis about timing for tracheostomy placement. The risk ratio for "death in hospital outcome" did not show any benefit from performing a tracheostomy before or after 14 days of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.49). The early tracheostomy before 14 days had a great impact on the days of mechanical ventilation (-26 days in mean difference, p < 0.00001). The authors also found a great reduction in hospital length of stay (-31.4 days, p < 0.008). For the days in PICU, the mean reduction was of 14.7 days (p < 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis suggests that tracheostomy performed in the first 14 days of ventilation can reduce the time spent on the ventilator, and the length of stay in the hospital, with no effect on mortality. The decision to perform a tracheostomy early or late may be more dependent on the baseline disease than on the time spent on ventilation .

Prospective Observational Study of Early Tracheostomy Role in Operated Severe Head Injury Patients at A Level 1 Trauma Center

Objective:

To evaluate the impact of the early tracheostomy on operated patients with severe head injury.

Methods:

This prospective observational study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center and medical college over one-year period. The study included all surgically managed severe head injury patients without any other life-threatening major injuries. Patients who underwent tracheostomy within 7 days were classified as early tracheostomy.

Results:

The patient’s mean age of this cohort study was 43.4±14.5 years. Motor-vehicle accidents were being the most common cause of severe head injury. Operated patients were undergoing early tracheostomy on an average of 2.9 days. We were observed that the patients spent on a mechanical ventilation on an average 3.67±2.26 days. This was significantly lower than previous four published studies (p<0.05) which had a range of mean 9.8-15.7 days.

Conclusion:

We have shown that it is possible to decrease mechanical ventilation (MV) time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and total hospital stay by doing early tracheostomy in operated severe head injury patients.

Optimal Timing of Tracheostomy in Injured Adolescents

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the optimal timing of tracheostomy for injured adolescents.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Trauma facilities in the United States.

PATIENTS

Adolescents (age 12-17 yr) in the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2016) who were ventilated for greater than 24 hours and survived to discharge.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After stratifying by traumatic brain injury diagnosis, we compared ICU and hospital length of stay, pneumonia, and discharge disposition of patients with tracheostomy prior to three cut points (3, 7, and 14 d after admission) to 1) patients intubated at least as long as each cut point and 2) patients with tracheostomy on or after each cut point. Of 11,045 patients, 1,391 (12.6%) underwent tracheostomy. Median time to tracheostomy was 9 days (interquartile range, 6-13 d) for traumatic brain injury and 7 days (interquartile range, 3-12 d) for nontraumatic brain injury patients. Nontraumatic brain injury patients with tracheostomy prior to 7 days had 5.6 fewer ICU days (-7.8 to -3.5 d) and 5.7 fewer hospital days (-8.8 to -2.7 d) than patients intubated greater than or equal to 7 days and had 14.8 fewer ICU days (-19.6 to -10.0 d) and 15.3 fewer hospital days (-21.7 to -8.9 d) than patients with tracheostomy greater than or equal to 7 days. Similar differences were observed at 14 days but not at 3 days for both traumatic brain injury and nontraumatic brain injury patients. At the 3- and 7-day cut points, both traumatic brain injury and nontraumatic brain injury patients with tracheostomy prior to the cut point had lower risk of pneumonia and risk of discharge to a facility than those with tracheostomy after the cut point.

CONCLUSIONS

For injured adolescents, tracheostomy less than 7 days after admission was associated with improved in-hospital outcomes compared with those who remained intubated greater than or equal to 7 days and with those with tracheostomy greater than or equal to 7 days. Tracheostomy between 3 and 7 days may be the optimal time point when prolonged need for mechanical ventilation is anticipated; however, unmeasured consequences of tracheostomy such as long-term complications and care needs must also be considered.