Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Kamnoedboon P, Mekki M, Durual S, Özcan M, Müller F. CAD-CAM complete denture resins: an evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface characteristics.
J Dent 2021;
114:103785. [PMID:
34419480 DOI:
10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103785]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
This study evaluated the biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface roughness of CAD-CAM milled and rapidly-prototyped/3D-printed resins used for manufacturing complete dentures.
METHODS
Six groups of resin specimens were prepared, milled-base (MB), milled-tooth shade (MT), printed-tooth shade (PT), printed-base with manufacturer-recommended 3D-printer (PB1), printed-base with third-party 3D-printer (PB2), printed-base in a vertical orientation (PB2V). Human epithelial (A-431) and gingival (HGF-1) cells were cultured and tested for biocompatibility using Resazurin assays. Three-point bending and nanoindentation tests measured the mechanical properties of the resin groups. Surface roughness was evaluated using a high-resolution laser profilometer. ANOVA and post-hoc tests were used for statistical analyses (α = 0.05).
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in biocompatibility between any of the investigated groups. MB revealed a higher ultimate strength (p = 0.008), elastic modulus (p = 0.002), and toughness (p = 0.014) than PB1. MT had significantly higher elastic modulus than PT (p < 0.001). Rapidly-prototyped resin samples with a manufacturer-recommended 3D-printer (PB1) demonstrated higher ultimate strength (p = 0.008), elastic modulus (p < 0.001), hardness (p < 0.001) and a reduced surface roughness (p < 0.05) when compared with rapidly-prototyped groups using a third-party 3D-printer (PB2). Rapidly-prototyped samples manufactured with a vertical printing orientation (PB2V) revealed a significantly lower elastic modulus than samples groups manufactured using horizontal printing orientation (PB2) (p = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limits of this present study, CAD-CAM milled and rapidly-prototyped complete denture resins performed similarly in terms of biocompatibility and surface roughness. However, the milled denture resins were superior to the rapidly-prototyped denture resins with regard to their mechanical properties. Printing orientation and type of 3D-printer can affect the resin strength and surface roughness.
Collapse