The screening, diagnosis, and management of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: A national consensus statement from Taiwan

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) worldwide. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ADPKD in Taiwan remains unavailable. In this consensus statement, we summarize updated information on clinical features of international and domestic patients with ADPKD, followed by suggestions for optimal diagnosis and care in Taiwan. Specifically, counselling for at-risk minors and reproductive issues can be important, including ethical dilemmas surrounding prenatal diagnosis and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Studies reveal that ADPKD typically remains asymptomatic until the fourth decade of life, with symptoms resulting from cystic expansion with visceral compression, or rupture. The diagnosis can be made based on a detailed family history, followed by imaging studies (ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging). Genetic testing is reserved for atypical cases mostly. Common tools for prognosis prediction include total kidney volume, Mayo classification and PROPKD/genetic score. Screening and management of complications such as hypertension, proteinuria, urological infections, intracranial aneurysms, are also crucial for improving outcome. We suggest that the optimal management strategies of patients with ADPKD include general medical care, dietary recommendations and ADPKD-specific treatments. Key points include rigorous blood pressure control, dietary sodium restriction and Tolvaptan use, whereas the evidence for somatostatin analogues and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors remains limited. In summary, we outline an individualized care plan emphasizing careful monitoring of disease progression and highlight the need for shared decision-making among these patients.

Patients’ outcome with polycystic kidney disease firstly treated with peritoneal dialysis. Experience of our home dialysis unit since 1997

We extracted data from the French Speaking Registry of Peritoneal Dialysis and retrospectively studied peritonitis and the outcome of 30 patients with polycystic kidney disease firstly treated with peritoneal dialysis within our dialysis unit since 1997. There were 15 men and 15 women with a mean age of 54 years. Eighty-five per-cent of the patients had hepatic impairment. Ten patients did not suffer from comorbidities. Charlson comorbidity index was greater than or equal to 4 in five patients. Most of the patients was treated with automated peritoneal dialysis during the night. Only one patient was not autonomous with peritoneal dialysis. The whole medical monitoring lasted 836 months, representing an average of 28 months per patient. Eleven patients had a total of 24 peritonitis, 9 with gram negative bacillus. The incidence of peritonitis was one episode every 35 months-patient. Peritonitis was responsible for sudden admission in hemodialysis unit in two cases and death in one case. Fifteen patients (50%) benefited from renal transplantation. Only one patient had to undergo nephrectomy prior to renal transplantation. Seven patients were admitted to hemodialysis unit (the median duration time on peritoneal dialysis was 36 months). Four patients died. Four patients are currently treated with peritoneal dialysis. In conclusion, this retrospective study points out that peritoneal dialysis, especially automated peritoneal dialysis, is a good option for patients with polycystic kidney disease necessitating dialysis.

Peritoneal dialysis patient selection from a comorbidity perspective

Despite many medical and socioeconomic advantages, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an underutilized dialysis modality that in most countries is used by only 5%-20% of dialysis patients, while the vast majority are treated with in-center hemodialysis. Several factors may explain this paradox, such as lack of experience and infrastructure for training and monitoring of PD patients, organizational issues, overcapacity of hemodialysis facilities, and lack of economic incentives for dialysis centers to use PD instead of HD. In addition, medical conditions that are perceived (rightly or wrongly) as contraindications to PD represent barriers for the use of PD because of their purported potential negative impact on clinical outcomes in patients starting PD. While there are few absolute contraindications to PD, high age, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, polycystic kidney disease, heart failure, and previous history of abdominal surgery and renal allograft failure, may be seen (rightly or wrongly) as relative contraindications and thus barriers to initiation of PD. In this brief review, we discuss how the presence of these conditions may influence the strategy of selecting patients for PD, focusing on measures that can be taken to overcome potential problems.

Identification of the Factors Associated With Intraperitoneal Pressure in ADPKD Patients Treated With Peritoneal Dialysis

Introduction

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is reported to be underused in the autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) population because doctors fear technical failure caused by reduced abdominal space and high intraperitoneal pressure (IPP).

Methods

We designed a multicenter retrospective study to be carried out in 15 French centers recruiting 60 patients with ADPKD treated with PD to identify factors associated with IPP. Inclusion criteria were start of PD between 2010 and 2017, available tomodensitometry, and IPP measurement in the first year of dialysis. The clinical and radiological data for each patient were reviewed by the same operator. Total kidney volume (TKV), liver volume, and the volume of the abdominal cavity were measured using contouring.

Results

TKV and the volume of the abdominal cavity in women and men were, respectively, 2397 ml versus 3758 ml and 9402 ml versus 12,920 ml. In the univariate analysis, IPP was significantly and positively associated with body surface area (P = 0.0024), body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.0001), the volume of the abdominal cavity (P = 0.0005), and the volume of the dialysate infused in the peritoneal cavity (IPV) (P = 0.0108). In the multivariate analysis, only BMI was still significantly associated with IPP (P = 0.0004)

Conclusions

Our results identified BMI as the main factor linked to IPP in patients with ADPKD. Despite a reliable assessment of the volume of their organs we did not find any correlation between liver and kidney volumes and IPP. To our knowledge, this is the first study designed to identify factors associated with IPP in patients with ADPKD on PD.

Risk Factors for Abdominal Wall Complications in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

← Background

Patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) have increased intra-abdominal pressure and a high prevalence of abdominal wall complications.

← Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of hernias and peritoneal leaks in our PD patients and to investigate their potential risk factors.

← Patients

We studied 142 unselected patients treated with PD during the past 5 years, including those that were already on PD and those that started PD during this period. Mean age was 54 years and mean follow-up on PD was 39 months. 72 patients had been treated with only continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD), 8 with automated PD (APD), and 62 with both modalities.

← Results

53 patients (37%) developed hernia and/or leak. A total of 39 hernias and 63 leaks were registered. The overall rates were 0.08 hernias/patient/year and 0.13 leaks/patient/year, 17 patients had both abdominal complications. Hernia was most frequently located in the umbilical region, and the most frequent site of leakage was the pericatheter area. Both complications appeared more frequently during the CAPD period (87% of hernias, 81% of leaks). The rate of hernias was higher in patients treated only with CAPD than in those that used only cyclers [0.08 vs 0.01 hernias/patient/year, not significant (NS)]. No patient treated only with APD had peritoneal leak; 25% (18/72) of patients treated with CAPD developed this complication ( p = 0.18, NS). Dialysate exchange volumes ranged from 2000 to 2800 mL. 25 (66%) patients required surgical repair of the hernia, with recurrence in 7 patients (28%). 27 (84%) patients with leaks were initially treated with transitory temporary transfer to hemodialysis, low volume APD, or intermittent PD for 4 weeks. The leak recurred in half of the cases and surgical repair was necessary in 12 cases. The development of hernia and/or leak did not correlate with gender, diabetes, duration of follow-up, type of PD, history of abdominal surgery, or with the largest peritoneal exchange volume used. Polycystic kidney disease was the only factor associated with higher rate of hernias ( p = 0.005), whereas increased age ( p = 0.04) and higher body mass index ( p = 0.03) were significantly associated with the appearance of leaks.

← Conclusion

Abdominal hernias and peritoneal leaks are very frequent in the PD population. Advanced age, polycystic kidney disease, and high body mass index are independent risk factors for their development. Automated PD with low daytime fill volume should be considered in all patients at risk for hernias and/or leaks.

[How to manage abdominal hernia on peritoneal dialysis?]

Abdominal hernias are a frequent complication in peritoneal dialysis, representing up to 60.4% of anatomical complications. Their prevalence varies between 7 and 27.5%. Established risk factors are male gender, an older age, multiparity, a low body mass index and a paramedian approach for the catheter insertion. Polykystic renal disease and the intra-peritoneal volume are controversial risk factors. The diagnosis is mainly clinical, though peritoneography imaging can be useful in difficult cases. Hernia's complications, of strangulation, incarceration, bowel occlusion and peritonitis; can be very serious, leading to technique failure and may result in death. The complication risk varies from 4 to 20% in the literature review. There are no guidelines regarding hernia's prevention or treatment. A surgical repair is recommended, by implementing a synthetic prothesis with an inguinal approach for inguinal and femoral hernias, with a simple stitch or a bioprothesis for ombilical hernias. The management of peritoneal dialysis after hernia repair is not codified. After an initial 48h interruption, an intermittent peritoneal dialysis program using low volume seems efficient at low risk, preventing a temporary transfer to haemodialysis.

End-Stage Kidney Disease in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A 12-Year Study Based on the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry

Background:

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease, with afflicted patients often progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). As the timelines to ESKD are predictable over decades, it follows that ADPKD patients should be optimized regarding kidney transplantation, home dialysis therapies, and vascular access.

Objectives:

To examine the association of kidney transplantation, dialysis modalities, and vascular access in ADPKD patients compared with a matched, non-ADPKD cohort.

Setting:

Canadian patients from 2001-2012 excluding Quebec.

Patients:

All adult incident ESKD patients who received dialysis or a kidney transplant.

Measurements:

ADPKD as defined by the treating physician.

Methods:

ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients were propensity score (PS) matched (1:4) using demographics, comorbidities, and lab values. Conditional logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations with kidney transplantation (preemptive or any), dialysis modality (peritoneal, short daily, home, or in-center hemodialysis [HD]), vascular access (arteriovenous fistula [AVF], permanent or temporary central venous catheter [CVC]), and dialysis survival.

Results:

We matched 2120 ADPKD (99.9%) with 8283 non-ADPKD with no significant imbalances between the groups. ADPKD was significantly associated with preemptive kidney transplantation (odds ratio [OR] = 7.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.74-8.87), any kidney transplant (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 2.14-2.63), and initial therapy of nocturnal daily HD (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.38-5.44), whereas in-center intermittent HD was significantly less likely in the ADPKD population (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.54-0.65). There was no difference in peritoneal dialysis (PD) as initial RRT but lower use of any PD among the ADPKD group (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.77-0.95). ADPKD patients were significantly more likely to have an AVF (OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 2.79-3.79) and less likely to have either a permanent (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78) or temporary (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.41-0.59) CVC as compared with the non-ADPKD cohort. Survival on either in-center HD or PD was better for ADPKD patients (HD: hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.44-0.53; PD: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.88).

Limitations:

Conservative care patients were not captured; despite PS matching, the possibility of residual confounding remains.

Conclusions:

ADPKD patients were more likely to receive a kidney transplant, use home HD, dialyze with an AVF, and have better survival relative to non-ADPKD patients. Conversely, they were less likely to receive PD either as initial therapy or anytime during ESKD. This may be attributed to higher transplantation or clinical decision-making processes susceptible to education and intervention.

Peritoneal Dialysis for Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

End-stage renal disease secondary to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney (ADPKD) is a common issue worldwide. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a reasonable option for renal replacement therapy for these patients and should not be withheld due to concerns that the patient may not tolerate the fluid volumes in the peritoneal cavity. This review covers the existing data on the outcomes and complications associated with the use of PD in the polycystic kidney disease patient. In general, PD is well tolerated and outcomes in ADPKD patients are equivalent to or better than other patient groups.

Outcome of polycystic kidney disease patients on peritoneal dialysis: Systematic review of literature and meta-analysis

Background

Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is the most frequent hereditary cause of chronic kidney disease. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is often avoided for patients with PKD because of the suspected risk of mechanical and infectious complications. Only a few studies have analyzed the outcome of PKD patients on PD with sometimes conflicting results. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate outcomes of patients with PKD treated by PD.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed examining all studies which included “Polycystic kidney disease” and “Peritoneal dialysis” in their titles, excluding commentaries, letters to the authors and abstracts. PubMed, Embase, Google scholar and Scopus were searched to December 31^st 2017. The primary outcome was overall patient survival. Additional outcomes were PD technique survival, incidence of peritonitis and incidence of abdominal wall hernia.

Results

9 studies published between 1998 and 2016 were included for analysis with a total of 7,197 patients including 882 PKD patients. Overall survival of PKD patients was found to be better compared to non-PKD patients (HR = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.54–0.92]). There were no statistical differences between PKD and non-PKD patients in terms of peritonitis (OR = 0.86 [95% CI, 0.66–1.12]) and technical survival (HR = 0.98 [95% CI, 0.83–1.16]). There was an increased risk of hernia in PKD patients (OR = 2.28 [95% CI, 1.26–4.12]).

Conclusions

PKD is associated with a better global survival, an increased risk of abdominal hernia, but no differences in peritonitis rate or technical survival were found. PD is a safe dialysis modality for PKD patients. Properly designed controlled studies are needed to determine whether all PKD patients are eligible for PD or whether some specific criteria should be determined.

Is peritoneal dialysis a therapeutic option for polycystic kidney disease? 15 years' experience in a single center

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is often avoided for patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD) because of increased risk of complications and technique failure due to limited intra-abdominal space. In this study, we have aimed to determine clinical outcomes, patient and technique survivals in patients with PKD performing PD and to define whether PD is appropriate for these patients.

METHODS

Totally 99 patients: 33 with PKD and 66 with diseases other than PKD were included in this retrospective study. All patients started PD between 2001 and 2015 years and have been matched by time of PD therapy initiation. Socio-demographic characteristics, clinical data and complications during the specified period were evaluated. The factors associated with mortality and patient and technique survival were investigated for all patients.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in terms of demographic, baseline and last visit clinical and laboratory parameters, additional systemic diseases, with the exception of higher pretreatment and last visit serum albumin levels in PKD patients (P=0.03 and 0.01 respectively) and younger age of non-PKD patients (P=0.002). Incidence of peritonitis and catheter exit-site/tunnel infections were similar among the two groups (P=0.26 and 0.12 respectively). The two groups were similar in terms of leak and hernia developments (P=0.07 and 0.57, respectively). By the end of the study period; in PKD group, 10 patients had been transferred to HD and had kidney transplantation and only 6 patients had died. In non-PKD group, 19 patients had been transferred to HD, 11 patients had kidney transplantation and 23 patients had died. Mortality was lower in PKD group (log rank=0.034). The two groups were similar regarding death and HD transfer reasons (P=0.35 and 0.36 respectively). The technique survival rates were similar among the two groups (log rank=0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal dialysis may be a suitable renal replacement therapy option for PKD patients. PKD is not an additional risk factor in patients treated by PD. Mortality is similar with non-diabetic PD patients. Peritoneal dialysis in PKD patients is associated with a similar overall rate of technique survival, incidences of hernia, leak and infectious complications as in non-PKD patients.

Peritoneal dialysis for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a retrospective study

To describe the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) who are on peritoneal dialysis (PD) therapy. We performed a retrospective matched-cohort analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of 30 ADPKD patients with those of 30 non-diabetic patients who had bilateral small kidneys between July 1 2007 and July 31 2014. The patient groups were matched by age, gender, and time of PD initiation. There were no significant differences in the demographic or biochemical parameters, comorbid conditions, residual glomerular filtration rate, or Charlson comorbidity score at the beginning of PD. The median renal volume was 1315 ml for the ADPKD group and 213 ml for the control group. Patients with ADPKD had similar 3-year patient survival (90.6% versus 86.3%, P=0.807) and technique survival (89.2% versus 74.3%, P=0.506) compared with non-ADPKD patients. Also, there was no significant difference in the peritonitis-free survival between the ADPKD and control groups (P=0.22), and rates of peritonitis were similar (0.19 versus 0.21 episodes per patient-year, P=0.26). No differences were observed in the incidence of PD-related complications, such as hernia and dialysate leak. ADPKD is not a contraindication for PD, and a subgroup of ADPKD patients with relatively small kidney volume can be treated using PD.

Peritoneal dialysis as a treatment option in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

PURPOSE

When choosing a dialysis option for ADPKD patients, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is often discouraged, due to its potential drawbacks: risk of abdominal hernias and dialysis fluid leaks, risk of peritonitis and insufficient dialysis adequacy. The present study was designed to compare the outcomes and dialysis efficacy in ADPKD patients treated with PD, in comparison with non-ADPKD subjects.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of the data from the national PD registry in which 106 ADPKD and 1606 non-ADPKD incident PD patients were evaluated. Data on dialysis adequacy, risk of dialysis-associated complications, as well as patient and technique survival were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The ADPKD patients did not differ from the non-ADPKD controls in terms of dialysis adequacy. After a median observation time of 32 months, there were no differences in patient or technique survival. The risk of abdominal hernias and dialysis fluid leaks was twice as high in ADPKD subjects, compared to the non-ADPKD group. However, these complications did not result in a need for a permanent transfer to hemodialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis adequacy, and patient and technique survival are similar in the ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients treated with PD. PD seems a feasible treatment option for end-stage renal failure in the course of ADPKD.

Renal replacement therapy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in Europe: prevalence and survival--an analysis of data from the ERA-EDTA Registry

BACKGROUND

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the fourth most common renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Still, there are few epidemiological data on the prevalence of, and survival on RRT for ADPKD.

METHODS

This study used data from the ERA-EDTA Registry on RRT prevalence and survival on RRT in 12 European countries with 208 million inhabitants. We studied four 5-year periods (1991-2010). Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and by Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

From the first to the last study period, the prevalence of RRT for ADPKD increased from 56.8 to 91.1 per million population (pmp). The percentage of prevalent RRT patients with ADPKD remained fairly stable at 9.8%. Two-year survival of ADPKD patients on RRT (adjusted for age, sex and country) increased significantly from 89.0 to 92.8%, and was higher than for non-ADPKD subjects. Improved survival was noted for all RRT modalities: haemodialysis [adjusted hazard ratio for mortality during the last versus first time period 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.91), peritoneal dialysis 0.55 (0.38-0.80) and transplantation 0.52 (0.32-0.74)]. Cardiovascular mortality as a proportion of total mortality on RRT decreased more in ADPKD patients (from 53 to 29%), than in non-ADPKD patients (from 44 to 35%). Of note, the incidence rate of RRT for ADPKD remained relatively stable at 7.6 versus 8.3 pmp from the first to the last study period, which will be discussed in detail in a separate study.

CONCLUSIONS

In ADPKD patients on RRT, survival has improved markedly, especially due to a decrease in cardiovascular mortality. This has led to a considerable increase in the number of ADPKD patients being treated with RRT.

Comparison of Percutaneous and Open Surgical Techniques for First-Time Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement in the Unbreached Peritoneum

BACKGROUND

The percutaneous Seldinger method of peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion has gained favor over recent years whereas traditionally it was reserved for patients considered not fit for general anesthesia. This blind technique is believed to be less safe, and is hence avoided in patients with previous laparotomy incisions. Reports on the success of this method may therefore be criticized for selection bias. In those with no prior abdominal surgery the optimal method of insertion has not been established.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of first-time PDC placements comparing the percutaneous (group P) and surgical (group S) insertion techniques in patients without a history of previous abdominal surgery in a single center between January 2003 and June 2010. We assessed catheter survival at 3 and 12 months post-insertion and compared complication rates between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 63 percutaneous and 64 surgical catheter insertions were analyzed. No significant difference was noted in catheter survival rates between group P and group S (86.2% vs 80% at 3 months, p = 0.37; and 78.3% vs 71.2% at 12 months, p = 0.42 respectively). Early and overall peritonitis rates were similar (5% vs 5.3%; p = 1, and 3.5 vs 4.9 episodes per 100 patient-months; p = 0.13 for group P and group S respectively). There were also no significant differences between the two groups in exit site leaks (15.9% in group P vs 6.3% in group S; p = 0.15), poor initial drainage (9.5% in group P vs 10.9% in group S, p = 0.34) or secondary drainage failure (7.9% in group P vs 18.8% in group S, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates the success and safety of percutaneous PDC insertion compared with the open surgical technique in PD naive patients without a history of prior abdominal surgery. Catheter survival was favorable with percutaneous insertion in this low-risk patient population but larger prospective studies may help to determine whether either method is superior. The percutaneous technique can be recommended as a minimally invasive, cost-effective procedure that facilitates implementing an integrated care model in nephrology practice.

The risk factors and the impact of hernia development on technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

There is a lack of consensus on the risk factors for hernia formation, and the impact on peritoneal dialysis (PD) survival has seldom been studied.

METHODS

This was a population-based study and all collected data were retrieved from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. Patients who commenced PD between January 1998 and December 2006 were screened for inclusion. Multiple logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were applied to estimate the predictors for hernia formation and determine the predictors of PD withdrawal.

RESULTS

A total of 6,928 PD patients were enrolled and followed until December 2009, with 631 hernia events and 391 hernioplasties being registered in 530 patients (7.7%). The incidence rate was 0.04 hernias/patient/year. Longer PD duration (per 1 month increase, hazard ratio (HR) 1.019) and history of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) (HR 1.584) were independent risk factors for hernia formation during PD, and female gender (HR 0.617) was a protective factor. On the other hand, there were 4,468 PD withdrawals, with cumulative incidence rates of 41% at 1 year, 66% at 3 years, and 82% at 5 years. Independent determinants for cumulative PD withdrawal included hernia formation during PD (HR 1.154), age (per 1 year increase, HR 1.014), larger dialysate volume (per 1 liter increase, HR 0.496), female gender (HR 0.763), heart failure (HR 1.092), hypertension (HR 1.207), myocardial infarction (HR 1.292), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (HR 1.227), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (HR 1.364), and history of MVP (HR 0.712) CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged PD duration was a risk factor for hernia formation, and female gender was protective. Hernia formation during PD therapy may increase the risk of PD withdrawal.

Polycystic kidney size and outcomes on peritoneal dialysis: comparison with haemodialysis

Background

For many nephrologists, patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD) have an increased risk of complications and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis (PD) due to enlarged kidneys. The literature showed that PD can be as good a therapeutic option as haemodialysis (HD) for patients with PKD. However, no study has focused on the impact of polycystic kidney size on outcomes for patients on PD.

Methods

This is a retrospective monocentric study. Fifty-eight patients with PKD started dialysis between January 2000 and December 2010: 24 on PD and 34 on HD. Kidney size assessed by abdominal computed tomography scans was available for 45 patients (19 on PD and 26 on HD). PD technique survival, specific PKD complications and mechanical and infectious PD complications, as need for pre-transplant nephrectomy and kidney transplantation, were considered.

Results

The two cohorts were similar in terms of age and body surface area. The median kidney size was not significantly different between PD and HD patients [19.1 cm (12.5–32.5) versus 16.5 cm (11.8–33.8), respectively, P = 0.13]. However, we identified an increased number of PD patients with larger kidneys [(>25 cm) (27.8% on PD versus 7.7% on HD (P = 0.07)]. Neither cystic (infection or haemorrhage) nor mechanical complications (hernias and leaks) were different in PD or HD. Ten patients experienced PD-related peritonitis, mainly due to non-enteric bacterial pathogens. The main reason for stopping PD and HD was transplantation. Six PD patients underwent nephrectomy in order to access the transplant programme. Among them, five were maintained on PD after surgical procedure with good adequacy dialysis criteria.

Conclusions

We observed no deleterious impact of kidney size on outcomes on PD when compared with HD. A large kidney size in patients with PKD is not a contraindication to PD. Patients for whom a pre-transplant nephrectomy is mandatory can also safely opt for PD as a dialysis method.

Peritoneal dialysis as the first-line renal replacement therapy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary cause of kidney failure. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) often is avoided because of concerns about hernias and peritonitis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective matched-cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

42 consecutive patients with ADPKD and 84 nondiabetic patients matched by time of PD therapy initiation.

PREDICTORS

ADPKD and comorbid conditions.

OUTCOMES

Patient survival, technique survival, peritonitis-free survival; peritonitis rate; abdominal hernias.

MEASUREMENTS

Dialysis adequacy and nutritional indexes; rate of decrease in residual renal function; bacteriologic cause of peritonitis.

RESULTS

5-year actuarial survival of the ADPKD and control groups was 71.0% and 69.7% (P = 0.4), whereas technique survival was 51.6% and 37.3%, respectively (P = 0.2). There was no difference in overall rates of peritonitis between the ADPKD and control groups (0.51 vs 0.53 episodes/patient-year; P = 0.3), and the incidence of Gram-negative peritonitis also was similar (0.16 vs 0.14 episodes/patient year; P = 0.5). Abdominal wall hernia was significantly more common in the ADPKD than control group (14 vs 6 cases; P < 0.001), but all patients were able to resume PD therapy after surgical repair.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study with limited sample size.

CONCLUSION

PD is a feasible treatment option for most patients with ADPKD with end-stage renal disease. Although patients with ADPKD have a higher risk of abdominal wall hernia, their overall survival rate and risk of peritonitis are similar to those of other nondiabetic PD patients.

Management of ESRD in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the leading hereditary cause of ESRD in the United States. Because of the renal and extrarenal manifestations of ADPKD, specific challenges exist caring for these patients once they reach ESRD. In this article, we report the overall outcomes of individuals with ADPKD after ESRD as compared with non-ADPKD patients. We also review the available literature concerning issues specific to dialysis or kidney transplantation. For the ADPKD patient on dialysis, we address the use of peritoneal dialysis, the management of renal cystic, and extrarenal complications, and we discuss the significance of the relative polycythemia often observed in this population. For the ADPKD patient undergoing kidney transplantation, we highlight issues of anemia management and aneurysm screening pretransplant, the indications for nephrectomy of the native ADPKD kidneys, the potential benefits of select immunosuppressive agents, the role for combined kidney-liver transplantation, and renal and extrarenal complications of ADPKD postkidney transplantation. In general, patients with ADPKD have more favorable outcomes after ESRD as compared with those with other causes of kidney failure. Most of our knowledge, however, is based on case series and observational studies. Although these reports have certainly been valuable to our understanding, there still remains considerable uncertainty and ambiguity in many aspects of ADPKD patient care as it relates to ESRD. Particular focus needs to be placed on performing clinical trials with the goal of enhancing outcomes and quality of life of patients with ADPKD.

Echocardiographic findings in kidney transplant patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a systemic disorder with a tendency for aneurysm formation which may also affect the heart. ADPKD kidney transplant patients were studied by echocardiography.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The case-control study consisted of 21 kidney transplant recipients and a group of 21 transplant patients with other diagnoses. They were in a stable phase a median of 3 years (range 1-10) after transplantation. M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography were performed.

RESULTS

Age, haemoglobin and renal function were not different between the groups but ADPKD patients had significantly lower systolic blood pressure (p=0.004). There were no abnormalities in the aortic or mitral valve in either group. The diameter of the left ventricular outflow tract, the bulb or the ascending aorta did not differ between the groups. The diameters of the left ventricle or atrium were also similar. The left ventricular mass index was 132+/-36 in ADPKD patients versus 163+/-63 g/m(2) in the controls (p=0.11). The left ventricular ejection fraction was 69+/-9.0 versus 70+/-8.9%. Early and atrial filling waves were equal.

CONCLUSION

Valvular anomalies were infrequent. Aneurysm formation in the aorta and signs of dilated cardiomyopathy were not increased in patients with ADPKD.

Polycystic kidney disease in patients on the renal transplant waiting list: trends in hematocrit and survival

BACKGROUND

The patient characteristics and mortality associated with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (PKD) have not been characterized for a national sample of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on the renal transplant waiting list.

METHODS

40,493 patients in the United States Renal Data System who were initiated on ESRD therapy between 1 April 1995 and 29 June 1999 and later enrolled on the renal transplant waiting list were analyzed in an historical cohort study of the relationship between hematocrit at the time of presentation to ESRD and survival (using Cox Regression) in patients with PKD as a cause of ESRD.

RESULTS

Hematocrit levels at presentation to ESRD increased significantly over more recent years of the study. Hematocrit rose in parallel in patients with and without PKD, but patients with PKD had consistently higher hemoglobin. PKD was independently associated with higher hematocrit in multiple linear regression analysis (p < 0.0001). In logistic regression, higher hematocrit was independently associated with PKD. In Cox Regression analysis, PKD was associated with statistically significant improved survival both in comparison with diabetic (hazard ratio, 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.77, p < 0.001) and non-diabetic (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56-0.82, p = 0.001) ESRD patients, adjusted for all other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Hematocrit at presentation to ESRD was significantly higher in patients with PKD compared with patients with other causes of ESRD. The survival advantage of PKD in ESRD persisted even adjusted for differences in hematocrit and in comparison with patients on the renal transplant waiting list.

Relationship between renal volume growth and renal function in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a longitudinal study

In autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), renal function remains normal for many years into adult life while cysts form and expand progressively, starting in childhood. The longitudinal relationships between renal volume growth, hypertension, and renal function loss have not been examined in detail. At the University of Colorado (Denver, CO), 229 adult subjects with ADPKD participated in a longitudinal study from 1985 to 2001. Sequential ultrasound examinations were performed at a mean interval of 7.8 +/- 3.1 years (range, 2.6 to 15.1 years). Renal volume was calculated using a standard formula for a modified ellipsoid. The Modified Diet in Renal Disease equation was used to calculate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The mean annual increase in renal volume was 46 +/- 55 cm3, and mean annual decline in GFR was 2.4 +/- 2.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. Men had faster renal growth, more severe hypertension, and a faster decline in GFR than women of similar ages. Multiple linear regression showed a significant relationship between rate of change in GFR and renal volume growth rate, initial renal volume, proteinuria, and age at entry. Correlational analysis showed a significant correlation between GFR and renal volume over time (R = -0.53) and between follow-up renal volume and follow-up GFR (R = -0.50) for both men and women. We conclude that renal volume and rate of renal volume growth may be useful markers for disease progression in early stages of ADPKD when GFR is preserved.