Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection With a Focus on Immunocompromised Patients

Therapeutics involved in managing initial and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: An updated literature review

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been increasing due to the effect of recurrent hospitalizations. The use of antibiotics has been shown to alter the gut microbiome and lead to CDIs. The treatment is limited to three major antibiotics; however, the incidence of recurrent CDIs has been increasing and drug resistance is a major concern. This aspect is a growing concern in modern medicine especially in the elderly population, critical care patients, and immunocompromised individuals who are at high risk of developing CDIs. Clostridium difficile can lead to various complications including septic shock and fulminant colitis that could prove to be lethal in these patients. Newer modalities of treatment have been developed including bezlotoxumab, a monoclonal antibody and fecal microbiota transplant. There have been studies showing asymptomatic carriers and drug resistance posing a major threat to the healthcare system. Newer treatment options are being studied to treat and prevent CDIs. This review will provide an insight into the current treatment modalities, prevention and newer modalities of treatment and challenges faced in the treatment of CDIs.

Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-effectiveness of Bezlotoxumab in Preventing Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection : Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a global health challenge. Bezlotoxumab (BEZ) is a monoclonal antibody against C. difficile toxin B. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), MODIFY I and II, confirmed BEZ efficacy in preventing recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). However, there are safety concerns about its use in patients with a history of congestive heart failure. Observational studies have since been conducted, and it is important to explore the consistency of BEZ efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and its safety utilizing these real-world data.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to pool the rate of rCDI in patients receiving BEZ and explore its efficacy and safety in preventing rCDI compared with control. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from inception through April 2023 for relevant RCTs or observational studies assessing BEZ in preventing rCDI. Single-arm studies describing experience with BEZ in preventing rCDI were also included for proportion meta-analysis. A proportion meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to pool the rCDI rate with its corresponding 95% CI. In a meta-analysis of efficacy, we generated the relative risk (RR) to compare BEZ versus control in preventing rCDI.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies including 2 RCTs and 11 observational studies totaling 2337 patients, of which 1472 received BEZ, were included in the analysis. Of the constituent studies, 5 (1734 patients) compared BEZ versus standard-of-care (SOC). Pooled rate of rCDI in patients receiving BEZ was 15.8% (95% CI: 14%-17.8%), and was 28.9% (95% CI: 24%-34.4%) in the SOC. BEZ significantly reduced rCDI risk compared with SOC [RR=0.57 (95% CI: 0.45-0.72, I2 =16%)]. There was no difference in the overall mortality or heart failure risk. Of the 9 included cost-effectiveness analyses, 8 demonstrated BEZ+SOC cost-effectiveness compared with SOC alone.

DISCUSSION

Our meta-analysis comprising real-world data revealed lower rCDI in patients receiving BEZ and supported its efficacy and safety when added to SOC therapy. The results were consistent across various subgroups. Available cost-effectiveness analyses mostly support BEZ+SOC cost-effectiveness compared with SOC alone.

Bring it on again: antimicrobial stewardship in transplant infectious diseases: updates and new challenges

Advancement in solid organ transplantation and hematopoietic stem cell transplant continues to improve the health outcomes of patients and widens the number of eligible patients who can benefit from the medical progress. Preserving the effectiveness of antimicrobials remains crucial, as otherwise transplant surgeries would be unsafe due to surgical site infections, and the risk of sepsis with neutropenia would preclude stem cell transplant. In this review, we provide updates on three previously discussed stewardship challenges: febrile neutropenia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and asymptomatic bacteriuria. We also offer insight into four new stewardship challenges: the applicability of the "shorter is better" paradigm shift to antimicrobial duration; antibiotic allergy delabeling and desensitization; colonization with multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms; and management of cytomegalovirus infections. Specifically, data are accumulating for "shorter is better" and antibiotic allergy delabeling in transplant patients, following successes in the general population. Unique to transplant patients are the impact of multidrug-resistant organism colonization on clinical decision-making of antibiotic prophylaxis in transplant procedure and the need for antiviral stewardship in cytomegalovirus. We highlighted the expansion of antimicrobial stewardship interventions as potential solutions for these challenges, as well as gaps in knowledge and opportunities for further research.

Clostridioides difficile infections; new treatments and future perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As a significant cause of global morbidity and mortality, Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are listed by the Centres for Disease Control and prevention as one of the top 5 urgent threats in the USA. CDI occurs from gut microbiome dysbiosis, typically through antibiotic-mediated disruption; however, antibiotics are the treatment of choice, which can result in recurrent infections. Here, we highlight new treatments available and provide a perspective on different classes of future treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Due to the reduced risk of disease recurrence, the microbiome-sparing antibiotic Fidaxomicin has been recommended as the first-line treatment for C. difficile infection. Based on the success of faecal microbiota transplantations (FMT) in treating CDI recurrence, defined microbiome biotherapeutics offer a safer and more tightly controlled alterative as an adjunct to antibiotic therapy. Given the association between antibiotic-mediated dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota and the recurrence of CDI, future prospective therapies aim to reduce the dependence on antibiotics for the treatment of CDI.

SUMMARY

With current first-in-line antibiotic therapy options associated with high levels of recurrent CDI, the availability of new generation targeted therapeutics can really impact treatment success. There are still unknowns about the long-term implications of these new CDI therapeutics, but efforts to expand the CDI treatment toolbox can offer multiple solutions for clinicians to treat this multifaceted infectious disease to reduce patient suffering.

Efficacy of Bezlotoxumab Against Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Case-Series Study at a University Hospital in Japan and Literature Review

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) recurrence is a public health concern as well as a health economic burden. Bezlotoxumab treatment is one way to prevent recurrence; however, its clinical results have not been reported in Japan. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy and safety of bezlotoxumab in patients with CDI at a university hospital in Japan and compared them with previously reported findings. Methodology We retrospectively examined all patients with some risk factors for recurrent CDI who received bezlotoxumab at the discretion of physicians at the Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi, Japan, between July 2018 and July 2022. The primary outcome was the three-month CDI recurrence rate. The secondary outcomes were an initial clinical cure and the six-month CDI recurrence rate. The safety of the administration was also assessed. Results A total of nine patients who received bezlotoxumab were included during the study period. The rate of CDI recurrence within three months was 28.5% (2/9). Two patients died due to other causes before their diarrhea improved. None of the patients experienced CDI recurrence between three and six months after the initial clinical cure of the baseline episode. Patients showed good tolerability to bezlotoxumab with no adverse effects. Two patients with a single episode of CDI recurrence before bezlotoxumab administration showed no recurrence. Conclusions In this Japanese case-series study, the efficacy of bezlotoxumab in preventing CDI recurrence in elderly patients with CDI and multiple underlying diseases was inferior to that reported in previous studies that analyzed real-world data. It is possible that bezlotoxumab may not be fully effective in elderly patients with CDI.

The Role of Bezlotoxumab for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infections: A Review of the Current Literature and Paradigm Shift after 2021

Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs), and particularly recurrent infections, cause a significant burden on the health-care system. Bezlotoxumab is a new agent for the prevention of recurrent CDIs that has shown strong efficacy and high tolerability in clinical trials. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the published literature for bezlotoxumab, with a focus on literature published since the release of the 2021 focused update to the CDI treatment guidelines. A Medline/PubMed search for “bezlotoxumab” was conducted, resulting in 152 articles. Seventeen studies are included in this review, after excluding non-English-language papers, phase I and II trials, and review articles. Studies published since the 2021 focused update support the recommendations in those guidelines. Furthermore, real-world studies have shown similar results to larger clinical trials. Those with more risk factors for recurrent CDI appear to benefit most from bezlotoxumab. Currently, there are no data to support the use of bezlotoxumab outside current guideline recommendations, but future trials may build on the data seen in real-world studies to further elucidate the place in therapy for bezlotoxumab.