1
|
Nugent D, Apoola A, Coleman H, Gilmour C, Lawton MD, Nori A, D C Ross J, Whitlock G, Yeend-Curd-Trimble H. British association for sexual health and HIV national guideline for the management of anogenital warts in adults (2024). Int J STD AIDS 2024:9564624241233338. [PMID: 38456387 DOI: 10.1177/09564624241233338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
This guideline offers recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and health promotion principles needed for the effective management of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related warts at anogenital sites including the external genitals, vagina, cervix, urethra, perianus and anal canal. The guideline is aimed primarily at patients aged 16 years or older presenting to healthcare professionals working in level 3 sexual health services in the United Kingdom. However, the principles of the recommendations may be applied in other care settings, including in primary care, using locally adapted care pathways where appropriate. The management of HPV-related anogenital dysplasia or warts at other extragenital sites is outside the scope of this guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diarmuid Nugent
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ade Apoola
- Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Harry Coleman
- Central & North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Cindy Gilmour
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Achyuta Nori
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan D C Ross
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gary Whitlock
- Chelsea & Westminster Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chromy D, Silling S, Wieland U, Kreuter A. [Anogenital warts-An update]. DERMATOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 75:30-39. [PMID: 38108864 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-023-05282-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
With a prevalence of around 1% in the sexually active population anogenital warts are the most frequent human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease. In the vast majority of cases the underlying cause of the infection is due to HPV types 6 and 11. The diagnosis can usually be clinically established but in certain cases a histopathological work-up can be useful. Buschke-Lowenstein tumors represent such a scenario. The current therapeutic armamentarium for anogenital warts ranges from surgical ablative procedures up to local immunomodulatory treatment. All procedures have different advantages and disadvantages and are relatively time-consuming and sometimes also unpleasant for the patient. Anogenital warts are also a possible expression of an incomplete immunological control of HPV. Therefore, it should be emphasized that for certain affected individuals, especially immunosuppressed patients, special attention should be given to ensuring that screening investigations for HPV-associated dysplasia is carried out according to the respective valid guidelines. The primary prophylaxis by vaccination of girls and boys prior to first HPV exposure represents a very effective option to drastically reduce the prevalence of anogenital warts and other HPV-related diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Chromy
- Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
| | - Steffi Silling
- Institut für Virologie, Nationales Referenzzentrum für Papillom- und Polyomaviren, Universitätsklinikum Köln und Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Ulrike Wieland
- Institut für Virologie, Nationales Referenzzentrum für Papillom- und Polyomaviren, Universitätsklinikum Köln und Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Alexander Kreuter
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Helios St. Elisabeth Klinik Oberhausen, Universität Witten-Herdecke, Oberhausen, Deutschland
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Helios St. Johannes Klinik Duisburg, Duisburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rosado-Velazquez D, Gestoso-Campos M, Medina-Porqueres I. Adductor longus injury after electromechanical self-treatment: A case report. Phys Ther Sport 2020; 46:7-13. [PMID: 32836098 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This case report illustrates an unusual cause of hip adductor muscle injury due to overenthusiastic self-treatment of the previously overloaded adductor muscles. Also, post-injury therapeutic objectives and intervention to facilitate rapid participation in sports after the described process are provided. CASE DESCRIPTION A 27-year old male, professional soccer player presented with hip adductors pain and impairment due to electromechanical self-treatment of the affected area. He was evaluated using hip-strength assessments, self-report, ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) until complete functional recovery had occurred. Along with clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging showed evidence of an isolated injury to the adductor longus muscle. A well-structured rehabilitation and readaptation program was followed in order to ensure early recovery and optimal functional outcome. OUTCOMES The athlete was able to participate in a full soccer training session without any limitation 18 days after his self-treatment session. The patient returned to his previous level of performance by 3rd week post-injury. CONCLUSION To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of muscle strain due to overenthusiasthic therapy. Although this is a rare complication of self-treatment procedures, patients and therapists should be aware of this risk in order to prevent and rapidly identify the lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ivan Medina-Porqueres
- Malaga Football Club Medical Services, Malaga, Spain; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Malaga, Faculty of Health Sciences, Malaga, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bertolotti A, Ferdynus C, Milpied B, Dupin N, Huiart L, Derancourt C. Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-Immunocompromised Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2020; 10:249-262. [PMID: 32030564 PMCID: PMC7090115 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-020-00357-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION No hierarchy of first-line treatments for anogenital warts (AGWs) is provided in international guidelines. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of topical treatments and ablative procedures for the management of AGWs. METHODS Twelve electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2018. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immunocompetent adults with AGWs who received at least 1 provider-administered or patient-administered treatment in at least 1 parallel group were included. Risk of bias assessment followed the Cochrane Handbook. The study endpoint was complete lesion response after clearance and recurrence assessment. A network meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS A network geometry was constructed based on 49 of the 70 RCTs included in our systematic review. All but 4 RCTs had a high risk of bias. The most efficacious treatments compared to placebo were surgery (RR 10.54; CI 95% 4.53-24.52), ablative therapy + imiquimod (RR 7.52; CI 95% 4.53-24.52), and electrosurgery (RR 7.10; CI 95% 3.47-14.53). SUCRA values confirmed the superiority of surgery (90.9%), ablative therapy + imiquimod (79.8%), and electrosurgery (77.1%). The most efficacious patient-administered treatments were podophyllotoxin 0.5% solution (63.5%) and podophyllotoxin 0.5% cream (62.2%). CONCLUSIONS With low-level evidence of most included RCTs, surgery and electrosurgery were superior to other treatments after clearance and recurrence assessment. Podophyllotoxin 0.5% was the most efficacious patient-administered treatment. Combined therapies should be evaluated in future RCTs in view of their identified effectiveness. The results of future RCTs should systematically include clinical type, number and location of AGWs, and sex of the patient, to refine therapeutic indications. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO-CRD42015025827.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Bertolotti
- Department of Infectious Disease, Saint-Pierre Hospital, Reunion Island, France.
- EA 4537, Antilles-Guyane University, Martinique, France.
- INSERM CICEC 1410, Reunion Island, France.
| | | | - Brigitte Milpied
- Department of Dermatology and Pediatric Dermatology, National Center for Rare Skin Disorders, Saint-André and Pellegrin Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nicolas Dupin
- Department of Dermatology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Laetitia Huiart
- Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Christian Derancourt
- EA 4537, Antilles-Guyane University, Martinique, France
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital de Briançon, Briançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jung JM, Jung CJ, Lee WJ, Won CH, Lee MW, Choi JH, Chang SE. Topically applied treatments for external genital warts in nonimmunocompromised patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 2019; 183:24-36. [PMID: 31675442 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Selecting a topical treatment from among the numerous topical agents for external genital warts remains challenging without clear evidence. Our aim was to evaluate comparatively the efficacy and safety of topical agents for external genital warts using a network meta-analysis. We included all randomized controlled trials that evaluated any topically applied treatment for external genital warts. Using the R package netmeta, network meta-analyses were performed with a frequentist approach. We identified 41 relevant studies comprising 6371 patients. Among conventional agents, podophyllotoxin 0·5% solution (odds ratio 1·94, 95% confidence interval 1·02-3·71) was significantly more efficacious than imiquimod 5% cream for lesion clearance; however, it was associated with a higher overall adverse event rate. Sinecatechins 15% ointment (odds ratio 0·21, 95% confidence interval 0·12-0·34) was significantly less efficacious than imiquimod 5% cream. Idoxuridine, polyhexamethylene biguanide, cidofovir and SB206 showed comparable therapeutic efficacies with conventional therapies. None of the treatments were significantly different from each other with respect to recurrence, patients with severe adverse events, or patients who withdrew because of treatment-related adverse events. Conventional modalities were efficacious and well tolerated, although each of them had their advantages and disadvantages. Additional efficacy and safety studies are warranted for unconventional agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Jung
- Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - C J Jung
- Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - W J Lee
- Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - C H Won
- Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - M W Lee
- Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - J H Choi
- Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - S E Chang
- Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bertolotti A, Milpied B, Fouéré S, Dupin N, Cabié A, Derancourt C. Local Management of Anogenital Warts in Non-immunocompromised Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2019; 9:761-774. [PMID: 31606873 PMCID: PMC6828858 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-019-00328-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several therapeutic options are available to manage anogenital warts (AGWs). However, no hierarchy of treatments is provided in the latest European and American recommendations. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of local treatments for the management of AGWs. METHODS A search was conducted through 12 databases from inception to August 2018. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which at least one parallel treatment group composed of immunocompetent adults with AGWs received at least one provider-administered or patient-administered treatment were included. Risk of bias assessment and meta-analyses of aggregated study data were performed on the basis of the Cochrane Handbook, and quality of evidence evaluation followed the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Primary endpoints were complete clearance and recurrence at 3 months. RESULTS Seventy RCTs (9931 patients) were included. All but four RCTs had a high risk of bias. CO2 laser was slightly more efficacious than cryotherapy [risk ratio (RR) 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-2.62], with fewer recurrences at 3 months (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.89). Electrosurgery was slightly more efficacious than cryotherapy. No differences in efficacy or side effects were found between cryotherapy and imiquimod or trichloroacetic acid. Podophyllotoxin gel was slightly more efficacious than podophyllotoxin cream. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) was slightly more efficacious and caused less erosion than CO2 laser (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.11-1.70). CONCLUSION The vast majority of included RCTs had a low level of evidence, thereby preventing the establishment of a hierarchy of treatments. Nevertheless, our results provide an overview of the main AGW treatments available for general practitioners and specialists. While provider-administered treatments are superior, patient-administered treatments (e.g., imiquimod, podophyllotoxin) are useful solutions for compliant patients. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO-CRD42015025827.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Bertolotti
- EA 4537, Antilles University, Martinique, France.
- Infectious Diseases, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion, Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France.
| | - Brigitte Milpied
- Department of Dermatology and Pediatric Dermatology, National Centre for Rare Skin Disorders, Saint-André and Pellegrin Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sébastien Fouéré
- Department of Dermatology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Dupin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France
| | - André Cabié
- EA 4537, Antilles University, Martinique, France
- Department of Dermatology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Christian Derancourt
- EA 4537, Antilles University, Martinique, France
- Department of Dermatology, Briançon Hospital, Briançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
O'Mahony C, Gomberg M, Skerlev M, Alraddadi A, de las Heras‐Alonso M, Majewski S, Nicolaidou E, Serdaroğlu S, Kutlubay Z, Tawara M, Stary A, Al Hammadi A, Cusini M. Position statement for the diagnosis and management of anogenital warts. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33:1006-1019. [PMID: 30968980 PMCID: PMC6593709 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anogenital warts (AGW) can cause economic burden on healthcare systems and are associated with emotional, psychological and physical issues. OBJECTIVE To provide guidance to physicians on the diagnosis and management of AGW. METHODS Fourteen global experts on AGW developed guidance on the diagnosis and management of AGW in an effort to unify international recommendations. Guidance was developed based on published international and national AGW guidelines and an evaluation of relevant literature published up to August 2016. Authors provided expert opinion based on their clinical experiences. RESULTS A checklist for a patient's initial consultation is provided to help physicians when diagnosing AGW to get the relevant information from the patient in order to manage and treat the AGW effectively. A number of frequently asked questions are also provided to aid physicians when communicating with patients about AGW. Treatment of AGW should be individualized and selected based on the number, size, morphology, location, and keratinization of warts, and whether they are new or recurrent. Different techniques can be used to treat AGW including ablation, immunotherapy and other topical therapies. Combinations of these techniques are thought to be more effective at reducing AGW recurrence than monotherapy. A simplified algorithm was created suggesting patients with 1-5 warts should be treated with ablation followed by immunotherapy. Patients with >5 warts should use immunotherapy for 2 months followed by ablation and a second 2-month course of immunotherapy. Guidance for daily practice situations and the subsequent action that can be taken, as well as an algorithm for treatment of large warts, were also created. CONCLUSION The guidance provided will help physicians with the diagnosis and management of AGW in order to improve the health and quality of life of patients with AGW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. O'Mahony
- School of MedicineUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - M. Gomberg
- Moscow Scientific and Practical Centre of Dermatovenereology and CosmetologyMoscowRussia
| | - M. Skerlev
- Department of Dermatology and VenereologyZagreb University School of Medicine and Zagreb University HospitalZagrebCroatia
| | - A. Alraddadi
- Dermatology SectionKing Khalid National Guard HospitalJeddah CitySaudi Arabia
| | | | - S. Majewski
- Department of Dermatology and VenereologyMedical University of WarsawWarsawPoland
| | - E. Nicolaidou
- 1st Department of Dermatology and VenereologyNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens“A. Sygros” Hospital for Skin and Venereal DiseasesAthensGreece
| | - S. Serdaroğlu
- Department of DermatologyCerrahpasa Medical FacultyIstanbul University‐CerrahpasaIstanbulTurkey
| | - Z. Kutlubay
- Department of DermatologyCerrahpasa Medical FacultyIstanbul University‐CerrahpasaIstanbulTurkey
| | - M. Tawara
- Ishtar Centre for Dermatology, Aesthetics and Laser SurgeryAmmanJordan
| | - A. Stary
- Outpatients Centre for the Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Fungal DiseasesViennaAustria
| | - A. Al Hammadi
- Dermatology CentreRashid HospitalDubai Health AuthorityDubaiUnited Arab Emirates
| | - M. Cusini
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoMilanItaly
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dadar M, Chakraborty S, Dhama K, Prasad M, Khandia R, Hassan S, Munjal A, Tiwari R, Karthik K, Kumar D, Iqbal HMN, Chaicumpa W. Advances in Designing and Developing Vaccines, Drugs and Therapeutic Approaches to Counter Human Papilloma Virus. Front Immunol 2018; 9:2478. [PMID: 30483247 PMCID: PMC6240620 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a viral infection with skin-to-skin based transmission mode. HPV annually caused over 500,000 cancer cases including cervical, anogenital and oropharyngeal cancer among others. HPV vaccination has become a public-health concern, worldwide, to prevent the cases of HPV infections including precancerous lesions, cervical cancers, and genital warts especially in adolescent female and male population by launching national programs with international alliances. Currently, available prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines are expensive to be used in developing countries for vaccination programs. The recent progress in immunotherapy, biotechnology, recombinant DNA technology and molecular biology along with alternative and complementary medicinal systems have paved novel ways and valuable opportunities to design and develop effective prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines, drugs and treatment approach to counter HPV effectively. Exploration and more researches on such advances could result in the gradual reduction in the incidences of HPV cases across the world. The present review presents a current global scenario and futuristic prospects of the advanced prophylactic and therapeutic approaches against HPV along with recent patents coverage of the progress and advances in drugs, vaccines and therapeutic regimens to effectively combat HPV infections and its cancerous conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Dadar
- Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
| | - Sandip Chakraborty
- Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, West Tripura, India
| | - Kuldeep Dhama
- Division of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, India
| | - Minakshi Prasad
- Department of Animal Biotechnology, LLR University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, India
| | - Rekha Khandia
- Department of Genetics, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, India
| | - Sameer Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Indian Council of Medical Research, Chennai, India
| | - Ashok Munjal
- Department of Genetics, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, India
| | - Ruchi Tiwari
- Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Sciences, U P Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhayay Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalay Evum Go-Anusandhan Sansthan, Mathura, India
| | - Kumaragurubaran Karthik
- Central University Laboratory, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, India
| | - Deepak Kumar
- Division of Veterinary Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, India
| | - Hafiz M. N. Iqbal
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Wanpen Chaicumpa
- Department of Parasitology, Center of Research Excellence on Therapeutic Proteins and Antibody Engineering, Faculty of Medicine SIriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thurgar E, Barton S, Karner C, Edwards SJ. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of anogenital warts: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2017; 20:v-vi, 1-486. [PMID: 27034016 DOI: 10.3310/hta20240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Typically occurring on the external genitalia, anogenital warts (AGWs) are benign epithelial skin lesions caused by human papillomavirus infection. AGWs are usually painless but can be unsightly and physically uncomfortable, and affected people might experience psychological distress. The evidence base on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for AGWs is limited. OBJECTIVES To systematically review the evidence on the clinical effectiveness of medical and surgical treatments for AGWs and to develop an economic model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the treatments. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases (MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library databases and Web of Science) were searched from inception (or January 2000 for Web of Science) to September 2014. Bibliographies of relevant systematic reviews were hand-searched to identify potentially relevant studies. The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for ongoing and planned studies. REVIEW METHODS A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness literature was carried out according to standard methods and a mixed-treatment comparison (MTC) undertaken. The model implemented for each outcome was that with the lowest deviance information criterion. A de novo economic model was developed to assess cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the UK NHS. The model structure was informed through a systematic review of the economic literature and in consultation with clinical experts. Effectiveness data were obtained from the MTC. Costs were obtained from the literature and standard UK sources. RESULTS Of 4232 titles and abstracts screened for inclusion in the review of clinical effectiveness, 60 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating 19 interventions were included. Analysis by MTC indicated that ablative techniques were typically more effective than topical interventions at completely clearing AGWs at the end of treatment. Podophyllotoxin 0.5% solution (Condyline(®), Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd; Warticon(®) solution, Stiefel Laboratories Ltd) was found to be the most effective topical treatment evaluated. Networks for other outcomes included fewer treatments, which restrict conclusions on the comparative effectiveness of interventions. In total, 84 treatment strategies were assessed using the economic model. Podophyllotoxin 0.5% solution first line followed by carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy second line if AGWs did not clear was most likely to be considered a cost-effective use of resources at a willingness to pay of £20,000-30,000 per additional quality-adjusted life-year gained. The result was robust to most sensitivity analyses conducted. LIMITATIONS Limited reporting in identified studies of baseline characteristics for the enrolled population generates uncertainty around the comparability of the study populations and therefore the generalisability of the results to clinical practice. Subgroup analyses were planned based on type, number and size of AGWs, all of which are factors thought to influence treatment effect. Lack of data on clinical effectiveness based on these characteristics precluded analysis of the differential effects of treatments in the subgroups of interest. Despite identification of 60 studies, most comparisons in the MTC are informed by only one RCT. Additionally, lack of head-to-head RCTs comparing key treatments, together with minimal reporting of results in some studies, precluded comprehensive analysis of all treatments for AGWs. CONCLUSIONS The results generated by the MTC are in agreement with consensus opinion that ablative techniques are clinically more effective at completely clearing AGWs after treatment. However, the evidence base informing the MTC is limited. A head-to-head RCT that evaluates the comparative effectiveness of interventions used in clinical practice would help to discern the potential advantages and disadvantages of the individual treatments. The results of the economic analysis suggest that podophyllotoxin 0.5% solution is likely to represent a cost-effective first-line treatment option. More expensive effective treatments, such as CO2 laser therapy or surgery, may represent cost-effective second-line treatment options. No treatment and podophyllin are unlikely to be considered cost-effective treatment options. There is uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness of treatment with imiquimod, trichloroacetic acid and cryotherapy. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005457. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
|
10
|
Gupta SK. Single dose intralesional immunotherapy with BCG of medically resistant condylomata acuminata of the penis: report of two cases. Int J Dermatol 2015; 55:583-6. [PMID: 26341833 DOI: 10.1111/ijd.12900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2014] [Revised: 10/25/2014] [Accepted: 11/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Kumar Gupta
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Safedabad, Barabanki, U.P., India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Abstract
Warts are the most common nail tumor generally caused by human papilloma virus (HPV) 1, 2, 4, 27, and 57. HPV 16 and 18 are associated with malignant transformation to squamous cell carcinoma, while HPV 2 and 7 are associated with "butcher's warts." Current treatments range from topical and intralesional therapies to systemic agents and surgical procedures. Despite the numerous available possibilities for treatment, intralesional bleomycin appears to be the most effective treatment for periungual warts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordana Herschthal
- Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gormley RH, Kovarik CL. Human papillomavirus-related genital disease in the immunocompromised host: Part II. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66:883.e1-17; quiz 899-900. [PMID: 22583721 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.12.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2010] [Accepted: 12/19/2010] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Human papillomavirus is responsible for common condyloma acuminata and a number of premalignant and malignant anogenital lesions. The immunocompromised population is at particular risk because of a higher incidence of malignant transformation. Lesions in this population may prove refractory to standard treatment. This is part II of a two-part review that will discuss the treatment of condyloma acuminata and vaginal, vulvar, penile, and anal intraepithelial neoplasias. This article will provide an updated review of available treatments, with a focus on recent advances and the challenges faced in successfully treating human papillomavirus lesions in the immunocompromised host.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel H Gormley
- Department of Dermatology, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Diaz ML. Human Papilloma Virus – Prevention and Treatment. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008; 35:199-217, vii-viii. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
15
|
Doanh LH, Khang TH. CONDYLOMATA ACUMINATA TREATMENT WITH CARBON DIOXIDE LASER IN COMPARISON WITH 0.15% PODOPHYLLOTOXIN CREAM. Laser Ther 2007. [DOI: 10.5978/islsm.16.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
16
|
Abstract
Patients and clinicians experience the frustration of cutaneous viral warts caused by infection with the human papilloma virus (HPV).Warts appear in various forms on different sites of the body and include common warts (verruca vulgaris), plane or flat warts, myrmecia, plantar warts, coalesced mosaic warts, filiform warts, periungual warts, anogenital warts (venereal or condyloma acuminata), oral warts and respiratory papillomas. Cervical infection with HPV is now known to cause cervical cancer if untreated. A review of the medical literature reveals a huge armamentarium of wart monotherapies and combination therapies. Official evidence-based guidelines exist for the treatment of warts, but very few of the reported treatments have been tested by rigorous blinded, randomized controlled trials.Therefore, official recommendations do not often include treatments with reportedly high success rates, but they should not be ignored when considering treatment options. It is the purpose of this review to provide a comprehensive overview of the wart treatment literature to expand awareness of the options available to practitioners faced with patients presenting with problematic warts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Lipke
- MPAS, PA-C, Department of Dermatology, Marshfield Clinic-Wausau Center, Wausau, WI 54401, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
The monetary and personal costs to society of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are enormous. In order to make a comparison of different treatment methods we reviewed the entire literature on HPV treatment from January 1966 to December 2003 using MEDLINE, with particular reference to published meta-analyses, randomized controlled and comparative studies. Patient-applied therapies offer patients the possibility of convenient and, on the whole, pain-free treatment. Podofilox (podophyllotoxin) and salicylic acid for genital and extragenital warts, respectively, have the additional advantage of being the most cost-effective treatments and, on this basis, they are to be commended as appropriate first-line agents. The second-line treatment of choice for common warts is cryotherapy. For recalcitrant common warts possible options include inosine pranobex with cryotherapy or electrosurgery, imiquimod with paring and occlusion, intralesional bleomycin, or diphencyprone. Alternative first-line and second-line treatments for genital warts would be either some form of surgical removal or imiquimod. The first option may be the cheapest but this has to be balanced against a degree of post-operative morbidity. Limited data from comparative studies do not show any clear difference in efficacy between cryotherapy, trichloroacetic acid, scissor excision, electrosurgery, and laser surgery in the treatment of genital warts, and the cost effectiveness of these therapies is probably similar to that of imiquimod. Cryotherapy and trichloroacetic acid are relatively expensive and inconvenient for patients and should be reserved as third-line treatments with certain exceptions, such as cryotherapy for meatal warts. The duration of treatment is significantly related to the number of warts present, the area covered by the warts, and the length of time the warts have been present. For recalcitrant anogenital warts third-line treatment options that show promise include surgery in combination with imiquimod or cidofovir cream. For squamous intraepithelial lesions that cannot easily be excised or physically ablated current treatment options include imiquimod and fluorouracil cream. The latter is an inexpensive option but causes the greatest morbidity. It is hoped that cidofovir may be added to this list if it becomes commercially available, and that protective and therapeutic HPV vaccines will transform the management of HPV in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Fox
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Anogenital warts and mollusca contagiosum are virally induced, benign skin tumors for which there is no single preferable therapy. Treatments include physical and chemical destruction, surgical removal, and biological response modifiers to enhance the natural immune response. The choice of therapy is an art, and depends upon patient preference, finances, number of lesions, and lesional morphology. However, the therapy of these lesions can sometimes be very painful and expensive, and therapy should not be worse than the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia T Ting
- Division of Dermatology and Cutaneous Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lacey CJN, Goodall RL, Tennvall GR, Maw R, Kinghorn GR, Fisk PG, Barton S, Byren I. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of podophyllotoxin solution, podophyllotoxin cream, and podophyllin in the treatment of genital warts. Sex Transm Infect 2003; 79:270-5. [PMID: 12902571 PMCID: PMC1744726 DOI: 10.1136/sti.79.4.270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and cost effectiveness of self applied podophyllotoxin 0.5% solution and podophyllotoxin 0.15% cream, compared to clinic applied 25% podophyllin in the treatment of genital warts over 4 weeks. METHODS We conducted a randomised controlled trial in 358 immunocompetent men and women with genital warts of 3 months' duration or less. RESULTS In the principal analysis both podophyllotoxin solution (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.56 to 5.50) and podophyllotoxin cream (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.70) were associated with significantly increased odds of remission of all warts compared to podophyllin. We performed two further analyses. When subjects defaulting from follow up were assumed to have been cured odds of remission of all warts were also significantly increased both for podophyllotoxin solution (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.68 to 5.49) and for podophyllotoxin cream (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.40). When subjects defaulting from follow up were assumed not to have been cured odds of remission of all warts were significantly increased for podophyllotoxin solution (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.27), but not for podophyllotoxin cream (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.00). Local side effects were seen in 24% of subjects, and recurrence of warts within 12 weeks of study entry in 43% of all initially cleared subjects, without statistically significant differences between the treatment groups. Direct, indirect, and total costs were similar across the three treatment groups. Podophyllotoxin solution was the most cost effective treatment, followed by podophyllotoxin cream, with podophyllin treatment being the least cost effective. CONCLUSIONS Self treatment of anogenital warts with podophyllotoxin showed greater efficacy and cost effectiveness than clinic based treatment with podophyllin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J N Lacey
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wiley DJ, Douglas J, Beutner K, Cox T, Fife K, Moscicki AB, Fukumoto L. External genital warts: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35:S210-24. [PMID: 12353208 DOI: 10.1086/342109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 254] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
External genital warts (EGWs) are visible warts that occur in the perigenital and perianal regions. They are due primarily to non-oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) types, usually types 6 and 11. Physical examination assisted by bright light and magnification is the recommended approach for primary diagnosis. Biopsy is indicated when EGWs are fixed to underlying structures or discolored or when standard therapies are not effective. Recurrences are common, and there is no single treatment that is superior to others. Among women with atypical squamous cells, molecular HPV testing may be useful in determining who should be referred for colposcopy. Condoms may provide some protection against HPV-related diseases and thus are recommended in new sexual relationships and when partnerships are not mutually monogamous. Because the efficacy of cesarean section in preventing vertical transmission of HPV infection from women with EGWs to their progeny has not been proved, it is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J Wiley
- Division of Primary Care, School of Nursing, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6919, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Human papillomavirus infection remains a great source of morbidity and mortality. Progress in understanding the structure of HPV and its pathogenesis has led to a wide variety of possible new treatment modalities to combat HPV-related disease. Most HPV infections (whether high risk or low risk) resolve without any medical intervention. Persistent or progressive disease, however, remains difficult to treat. Although currently available therapies have proved efficacious and tolerable in the treatment of nongenital and genital warts, no single therapy is uniformly effective in eradicating persistent HPV infection. Cytodestructive methods, such as cryotherapy, remain the primary treatment modality for nongenital warts. Immune response modifiers, such as imiquimod, currently show the greatest promise in treating HPV-induced anogenital lesions, both with respect to complete response and in preventing recurrence. Human papillomavirus infection is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases in the world, and cervical cancer still causes significant morbidity and mortality. Pap smear tests have greatly reduced the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in developed countries. Additional research will focus on primary and secondary prevention strategies. Vaccines against high-risk HPV types are promising modalities currently under investigation to prevent HPV infections and possibly to treat them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathijs H Brentjens
- Departments of Dermatology, Microbiology/Immunology, and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sonnex C, Lacey CJ. The treatment of human papillomavirus lesions of the lower genital tract. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 15:801-16. [PMID: 11563874 DOI: 10.1053/beog.2001.0221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Anogenital warts are caused by human papillomavirus types 6 and 11 infection, and are the most common clinical manifestation of lower genital tract human papillomavirus infection. They are the most frequently recognized sexually transmitted disease in the developed world, occurring at an incidence rate of 0.5-1.2% in young men and women aged 18-25 years. Many therapies for genital warts have been described, none being ideal in that all therapeutic modalities fail to clear the warts in a proportion of patients, and the recurrence of warts after successful treatment is seen with all treatments. The current knowledge base of the therapy of genital warts is flawed by a lack of good natural history data either with treatment or without treatment over longer periods of time, in that most trials report comparisons of monotherapies over a short time and there is a lack of structured trials addressing consecutive therapies over longer durations, as occurs in real-life clinical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Sonnex
- Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- C J Lacey
- Department of Genitourinary Medicine, General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|