Low prevalence of bone mineral density testing in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and glucocorticoid exposure

Circulating Levels of Low-Density Granulocytes and Cell-Free DNA as Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease and Bone Deterioration in SLE Patients

OBJECTIVE

 The present work evaluates the predictive value of low-density granulocytes (LDGs) for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and/or bone deterioration (BD) in a 6-year prospective study in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Considering the high SLE-LDG capacity to form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), circulating levels of total cell-free DNA (cirDNA) and relative amounts of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA (mtDNA and nDNA, respectively) were tested as LDG-associated biomarkers to identify SLE patients at risk of CVD and BD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 The frequency of total blood LDGs, as well as the CD16negCD14neg (nLDG) and CD16posCD14low (pLDG) subsets, was quantified by flow cytometry in 33 controls and 144 SLE patients. Total cirDNA and relative amounts of mitochondrial (mtDNA) and nuclear (nDNA) cell-free DNA were measured by fluorometry or qPCR in plasma from a subgroup of 117 patients and 23 controls at enrolment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

 Our findings showed increased blood levels of SLE-nLDGs at enrolment associated with prospective CVD development (pCVD) and the presence of BD, thus revealing LDG expansion as a predictor of both comorbidities in SLE progression. The amounts of the different types of circulating DNA analyzed were increased in patients, especially those presenting with traditional CV risk factors or subclinical atheromatosis. Similar to nLDGs, the nDNA concentration could predict the development of pCVD in SLE, supporting the quantification of cirDNA levels as a surrogate marker of LDGs in clinical practice.

Potential association of rheumatic diseases with bone mineral density and fractures: a bi-directional mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have implicated rheumatoid arthritis as an independent risk factor for bone density loss. However, whether there is a causal relationship between rheumatic diseases and bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures is still controversial. We employed a bidirectional Mendelian analysis to explore the causal relationship between rheumatic diseases and BMD or fractures.

METHODS

The rheumatic diseases instrumental variables (IVs) were obtained from a large Genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis dataset of European descent. Analyses were performed for the three rheumatic diseases: ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (n = 22,647 cases, 99,962 single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 58,284 cases, 13,108,512 SNPs), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n = 14,267 cases, 7,071,163 SNPs). Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses were carried out by using R language TwoSampleMR version 0.5.7. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, and weighted median methods were used to analyze the causal relationship between rheumatic diseases and BMD or fracture.

RESULTS

The MR results revealed that there was absence of evidence for causal effect of AS on BMD or fracture. However, there is a positive causal relationship of RA with fracture of femur (95% CI = 1.0001 to 1.077, p = 0.046), and RA and fracture of forearm (95% CI = 1.015 to 1.064, p = 0.001). SLE had positive causal links for fracture of forearm (95% CI = 1.004 to 1.051, p = 0.020). Additionally, increasing in heel bone mineral density (Heel-BMD) and total bone mineral density (Total-BMD) can lead to a reduced risk of AS without heterogeneity or pleiotropic effects. The results were stable and reliable. There was absence of evidence for causal effect of fracture on RA (95% CI = 0.929 to 1.106, p = 0.759), and fracture on SLE (95% CI = 0.793 to 1.589, p = 0.516).

CONCLUSIONS

RA and SLE are risk factors for fractures. On the other hand, BMD increasing can reduce risk of AS. Our results indicate that rheumatic diseases may lead to an increased risk of fractures, while increased BMD may lead to a reduced risk of rheumatic diseases. These findings provide insight into the risk of BMD and AS, identifying a potential predictor of AS risk as a reduction in BMD.

Phenotype Risk Score but Not Genetic Risk Score Aids in Identifying Individuals With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the Electronic Health Record

OBJECTIVE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) poses diagnostic challenges. We undertook this study to evaluate the utility of a phenotype risk score (PheRS) and a genetic risk score (GRS) to identify SLE individuals in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Using a de-identified electronic health record (EHR) database with an associated DNA biobank, we identified 789 SLE cases and 2,261 controls with available MEGAEX genotyping. A PheRS for SLE was developed using billing codes that captured American College of Rheumatology SLE criteria. We developed a GRS with 58 SLE risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

RESULTS

SLE cases had a significantly higher PheRS (mean ± SD 7.7 ± 8.0 versus 0.8 ± 2.0 in controls; P < 0.001) and GRS (mean ± SD 12.2 ± 2.3 versus 11.0 ± 2.0 in controls; P < 0.001). Black individuals with SLE had a higher PheRS compared to White individuals (mean ± SD 10.0 ± 10.1 versus 7.1 ± 7.2, respectively; P = 0.002) but a lower GRS (mean ± SD 9.0 ± 1.4 versus 12.3 ± 1.7, respectively; P < 0.001). Models predicting SLE that used only the PheRS had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87. Adding the GRS to the PheRS resulted in a minimal difference with an AUC of 0.89. On chart review, controls with the highest PheRS and GRS had undiagnosed SLE.

CONCLUSION

We developed a SLE PheRS to identify established and undiagnosed SLE individuals. A SLE GRS using known risk SNPs did not add value beyond the PheRS and was of limited utility in Black individuals with SLE. More work is needed to understand the genetic risks of SLE in diverse populations.

Rates of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and prophylaxis prescribing patterns in a large electronic health record cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective No guidelines exist for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Limited data are available on incidence of PJP infection and use of PJP prophylaxis. Using a real-world, electronic health record (EHR) cohort, we investigated the frequency of PJP infections as well as patient and provider factors that impacted use and type of PJP prophylaxis. Methods  In a large, de-identified EHR, we identified possible SLE patients using a previously validated algorithm. PJP ICD-9 or ICD-10-CM billing codes and PJP keywords were used to identify possible PJP cases within this SLE cohort. We assessed for PJP prophylaxis prescribing in all SLE patients using keywords and reviewing medication lists for prophylactic agents. Chart review was used to confirm cases of SLE, PJP, and PJP prophylaxis and to obtain data on demographics, comorbidities, and immunosuppressants. Results Of 977 SLE patients, there were only four with confirmed PJP infection. Two of these patients had concurrent Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, and none were on prophylaxis. Of 977 SLE patients, 132 (14%) were prescribed PJP prophylaxis. Of 617 SLE patients ever prescribed immunosuppressants, 128 (21%) were prescribed PJP prophylaxis. Sulfonamides were the most common prophylaxis prescribed (69%), and possible adverse events were documented in 22 out of 117 instances of being placed on a sulfonamide. Patients of younger age, Black race, nephritis, and renal transplant, and on chronic glucocorticoids were all more likely to have PJP prophylaxis prescribed. Patients who were on transplant induction medications, calcineurin/mTOR inhibitors, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate mofetil all were more likely to be prescribed PJP prophylaxis compared to other immunosuppressants. Conclusion PJP is a rare diagnosis among SLE patients, and prior studies may even overestimate its prevalence. PJP prophylaxis was less common in our cohort than previously described. Adverse events related to sulfonamides used for PJP prophylaxis were relatively rare with lower rates than previously reported. Our study demonstrates real-world PJP prophylaxis prescribing patterns in a large cohort of SLE patients.

Logistic Entropy of Trabecular Bone Score in SLE Patients and New Type Visualizations

The medical images and reference intervals, in the diagnosis and treatment process of diseases, are undoubtedly very important. Clear and easy interpretation of images and reference intervals derived from medical devices and statistical methods, respectively, are of great importance for doctors in the diagnosis and treatment process. In this article, for systemic lupus erythematosus disease, we have transformed the reference intervals into fuzzy sets and calculated the entropy values to find the uncertainty contained in the reference interval of systemic lupus erythematosus disease, so the doctors can keep in view patient treatment using entropy values. Finally, for better observations of patients, with the help of the entropy functions, new types of medical images were given for some trabecular bone diseases using Wolfram Mathematica 7.0. We should note that this type of medical images for bone mineral density is not in medicine.