Comparing pregnancy outcomes in patients with criteria and non-criteria autoimmune disease: A systematic review

Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a comprehensive literature review

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder associated with thrombotic events and adverse obstetric outcomes, particularly in its obstetric form (OAPS). Affecting approximately 0.5% of the population, APS is a leading contributor to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), preeclampsia (PE), and fetal growth restriction ((FGR). Despite advancements in understanding its pathophysiology and management, optimal treatment strategies for APS in pregnancy remain challenging and require systematic evaluation. This review synthesizes current evidence on APS mechanisms, diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic interventions, with a focus on maternal and fetal outcomes in OAPS.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, was conducted to identify studies exploring APS pathogenesis, diagnostic standards, and treatment efficacy in obstetric settings. Inclusion criteria prioritized randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and systematic reviews with a clear focus on APS and pregnancy.

RESULTS

The review confirmed that APS current accepted pathogenesis is governed by a "two-hit" model, where antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) initiate endothelial damage, culminating in thrombosis and placental insufficiency. Epidemiological analysis underscores the prevalence and severity of APS in obstetric contexts, with lupus anticoagulant (LA) emerging as a significant predictor of adverse outcomes. Evidence supports the use of low-dose aspirin (LDA) and heparin to reduce miscarriage rates, while adjunctive treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), have shown promise in improving live birth rates and reducing preterm delivery in high-risk cases. Emerging therapies, including tumoral necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) inhibitors and nitric oxide modulators, may offer additional benefits in refractory cases.

CONCLUSION

APS remains a critical determinant of adverse pregnancy outcomes, necessitating precise diagnostic criteria and tailored management approaches. This systematic review emphasizes the importance of individualized therapeutic regimens to optimize maternal and fetal health in OAPS and highlights areas for future research, particularly regarding novel pharmacological approaches. Further studies are essential to refine treatment protocols and improve clinical guidelines for managing APS in pregnancy.

Comparing pregnancy outcomes in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease (UCTD): a descriptive cohort study

BACKGROUND

Females diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) face an elevated risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). However, the evidence regarding whether a similar association exists in patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) is inconclusive.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review (2006-2019) of pregnancy outcomes among patients with SLE (n = 51) and UCTD (n = 20) within our institution. We examined the occurrence of various APOs, encompassing miscarriage, stillbirth, termination, preterm birth, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, intrauterine growth restriction, abruption placentae, congenital heart block, or other cardiac abnormalities.

RESULTS

The mean age at pregnancy was 35 ± 7.0 years for patients with SLE and 35 ± 6.8 years for those with UCTD (p = 0.349). The proportion of Caucasian women was 47% in SLE and 80% in UCTD. Pregnancies in both groups were planned (81% in SLE and 77% in UCTD), and patients presented with inactive disease at conception (96% in SLE and 89% in UCTD). Hydroxychloroquine at conception was utilized by 86% of women with SLE, in contrast to 36% in the UCTD group. Both, SLE and UCTD cohorts exhibited low rates of disease flares during pregnancy and/or puerperium (14% vs. 10%). The incidence of APOs was 15.6% in SLE patients compared to 5% in those with UCTD (Risk difference 19.5%; 95% confidence interval: -3.9 to 43.1; p = 0.4237).

CONCLUSION

Our study underscores the importance of strategic pregnancy planning and the maintenance of appropriate treatment throughout pregnancy to ensure optimal disease management and minimize adverse outcomes in both SLE and UCTD pregnancies.

Autoimmune diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an umbrella review

BACKGROUND

There is a high prevalence of autoimmune conditions in women specially in the reproductive years; thus, the association with adverse pregnancy outcomes has been widely studied. However, few autoimmune conditions/adverse outcomes have been studied more than others, and this umbrella review aims to consolidate existing knowledge in this area with the aim to provide new knowledge and also identify gaps in this research area.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to December 2023. Screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal (AMSTAR 2) were done by two independent reviewers. Data were synthesised narratively and quantitatively. Relative risks (RR)/odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were reported.

RESULTS

Thirty-two reviews were included consisting of 709 primary studies. The review reported the association between 12 autoimmune conditions and 16 adverse pregnancy outcomes. Higher risk of miscarriage is reported in women with Sjögren's syndrome RR 8.85 (95% CI 3.10-25.26) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) OR 4.90 (3.10-7.69). Pre-eclampsia was reported higher in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) OR 4.19 (3.08-5.71) and SLE OR 3.20 (2.54-4.20). Women reported higher risk of diabetes during pregnancy with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) OR 2.96 (1.47-5.98). There was an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction in women with systemic sclerosis OR 3.20 (2.21-4.53) and coeliac disease OR 1.71 (1.36-2.14). Preterm birth was associated with T1DM OR 4.36 (3.72-5.12) and SLE OR 2.79 (2.07-3.77). Low birth weight babies were reported in women with women with SLE or systemic sclerosis OR 5.95 (4.54-7.80) and OR 3.80 (2.16-6.56), respectively. There was a higher risk of stillbirth in women with T1DM OR 3.97 (3.44-4.58), IBD OR 1.57 (1.03-2.38), and coeliac disease OR 1.57 (1.17-2.10). T1DM in women was associated with 32% lower odds of small for gestational age baby OR 0.68 (0.56-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women with autoimmune conditions are at a greater risk of developing adverse pregnancy outcomes. Further research is required to develop better preconception to postnatal care for women with autoimmune conditions.

Pregnancy in antiphospholipid syndrome: what should a rheumatologist know?

This review focuses on the management of reproductive issues in women who have antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or are carriers of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The importance of aPL detection during preconception counselling relies on their pathogenic potential for placental insufficiency and related obstetric complications. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes can be minimized by individualized risk stratification and tailored treatment aimed at preventing placental insufficiency. Combination therapy of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid and heparin is the mainstay of prophylaxis during pregnancy; immunomodulation, especially with hydroxychloroquine, should be considered in refractory cases. Supplementary ultrasound surveillance is useful to detect fetal growth restriction and correctly tailor the time of delivery. The individual aPL profile must be considered in the stratification of thrombotic risk, such as during assisted reproduction techniques requiring hormonal ovarian stimulation or during the follow-up after pregnancy in order to prevent the first vascular event.

Clinical phenotype, treatment strategy and pregnancy outcome of non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

PROBLEM

To illustrate the clinical features, treatment strategy, and pregnancy outcome of patients with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS), non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (NC-OAPS) METHOD OF STUDY: A single-center nested case-control study was designed. Patients with a diagnosis of OAPS and NC-OAPS were enrolled. The medical history, coagulation status, and antibody profile data were collected. Patients were given standard anticoagulation therapy with or without glucocorticoids (GC) and/or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) during pregnancy and were observed for their pregnancy outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients with OAPS and 120 patients with NC-OAPS were finally included, of whom 55 patients met the clinical criteria (subgroup C) and 65 met the laboratory criteria (subgroup L). Pregnancy morbidity showed significant differences: gravida, pregnancy loss in OAPS versus NC-OAPS. The coagulation function was not significantly different between OAPS and NC-OAPS groups, while TT and FIB were significantly higher in the subgroup C. Thromboelastography (TEG) results showed a significantly lower ANGEL in the NC-OAPS group, a higher ANGEL and lower EPL, LY30 in the subgroup L. No differences between groups were observed in treatment strategy. The pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different between NC-OAPS and OAPS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and laboratory differences were found between OAPS and NC-OAPS groups in this study. Patients in different subgroups of NC-OAPS could be identified with different clinical phenotypes. A relatively hypercoagulable status existed in the OAPS group compared to NC-OAPS, and also in the subgroup L.

Role of inflammatory factors in the etiology and treatment of recurrent implantation failure

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is characterized by the absence of implantation after high-grade embryos are transferred to the endometrium by at least three in vitro fertilization cycles. It is one of the most important factors contributing to reproductive failure. After numerous barriers have been overcome to obtain good-quality embryos, RIF causes extreme distress and frustration in women and couples. In recent years, significant progress has been made in understanding how inflammatory factors, which include pro-inflammatory factors, anti-inflammatory factors, chemokines, and other molecules, contribute to RIF. Immunological abnormalities, hypercoagulability, and reproductive diseases are considered potential causes of RIF. In alloimmune disorders, inflammatory factors can affect the success rate of embryo implantation by altering T helper (Th)1/Th2 and Th17/regulatory T cell ratios and causing imbalances of uterine natural killer cells and macrophages. Autoimmune disorders can also lead to RIF. Inflammatory factors also play key roles in RIF-related disorders such as hypercoagulability, chronic endometritis, adenomyosis, hydrosalpinx, and endometriosis. This review focuses on the roles of inflammatory factors in RIF, including immune factors, blood hypercoagulable states, and reproductive diseases such as chronic endometritis, adenomyosis, hydrosalpinx, and endometriosis. It also summarizes the different treatments according to the causes of RIF and discusses the efficacy of sirolimus, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, low-dose aspirin combined with low-molecular-weight heparin, blocking interleukin-22, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in the treatment of RIF.