Population screening for haemochromatosis: expectations based on a study of relatives of symptomatic probands

Penetrance of the C28Y/C282Y genotype of the HFE gene

OBJECTIVE

Hereditary hemochromatosis is a common genetic disease caused by accumulation of iron in the body. Most cases are homozygous for the C282Y mutation in the HFE gene, but only a minority of homozygotes will ever suffer from clinical hemochromatosis. Estimates of the penetrance of the C282Y/C282Y genotype vary greatly. The purpose of this study was to estimate the penetrance using a stringent definition, i.e. liver cirrhosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The results from previous phenotypic population screening for hereditary hemochromatosis were combined with findings in hospital databases in order to estimate the number of C282Y homozygotes with and without liver cirrhosis in a Norwegian county. The penetrance of the C282Y/C282Y genotype was estimated as the fraction of C282Y homozygotes with liver cirrhosis. We also calculated the expected number of male C282Y homozygotes with liver cirrhosis using figures for age-specific accumulated risk.

RESULTS

The prevalence of liver cirrhosis in male homozygotes is between 3.4% and 5.0%. This figure is compatible with an accumulated risk of liver cirrhosis that increases from 0.2% at 35 years to about 10% at 65 years of age. In female homozygotes, the prevalence of liver cirrhosis is 0.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

A small but significant number of Norwegian male C282Y homozygotes will contract liver cirrhosis if their hemochromatosis is not diagnosed and treated in time. The penetrance is much lower in women than in men.

Hemochromatosis: genetics and pathophysiology

A number of genetic disorders can result in the accumulation of excess iron in the body. These causes of hereditary hemochromatosis include defects in genes encoding HFE, transferrin receptor 2, ferroportin, hepcidin, and hemojuvelin. Hepcidin, with its cognate receptor, ferroportin, has emerged as a central regulator of iron homeostasis; all of the known causes of hemochromatosis appear to prevent this system from functioning normally. The most common form of primary hemochromatosis is that caused by C282Y mutation of the HFE gene. This mutation is most prevalent among Northern Europeans. Although the frequency of the homozygous genotype is approximately 5 per 1000, the disease itself is quite rare because the clinical penetrance of the genotype is very low.

When and how should we screen for hereditary hemochromatosis?

Hemochromatosis is the clinical expression of iron overload and occurs as hereditary and secondary variants. In hereditary hemochromatosis, an inborn error in iron metabolism results in excess absorption of dietary iron, which gradually accumulates in the liver, pancreas, and heart. The most common form of hereditary hemochromatosis is related to homozygosity for the C282Y mutation in the HFE gene. Early diagnosis is essential because hereditary hemochromatosis is common, severe, and treatable. Early manifestations consist of asthenia, arthralgia, and serum transferrin saturation elevation. The C282Y mutation should be looked for to confirm the diagnosis in the patient and family members. Measurement of serum transferrin saturation followed by genetic testing in individuals with values above 45% is a reasonable screening strategy.

Hemochromatosis detection in a health screening program at an Alabama forest products mill

We analyzed hemochromatosis detection in a 11.5-year multiphasic health screening program at a forest products mill. There were 2199 participants: 2032 Whites (1506 men, 526 women) and 167 African Americans (124 men, 43 women); 85.0% of employees were screened. Iron and transferrin saturation were measured in a serum biochemistry profile on specimens obtained after overnight fasting; ferritin was measured in participants with elevated iron concentrations or transferrin saturation > 48%. Participants with elevated ferritin levels underwent further evaluation. Eight White men were diagnosed to have hemochromatosis (frequency 0.0039 in Whites, 0.0053 in White men). The estimated cost per case detected was $8826. Family members of two participants with hemochromatosis were also diagnosed to have hemochromatosis or iron overload. We conclude that detecting hemochromatosis in a workplace multiphasic health screening program is efficacious and economical.

Strategies for early diagnosis of haemochromatosis

Genetic haemochromatosis is one of the most frequent inborn errors of metabolism. Only patients with early non-cirrhotic haemochromatosis treated by phlebotomies have a normal life expectancy. The present review analyses strategies for early diagnosis of haemochromatosis by using the Medline database and own data from a large cohort of patients with haemochromatosis. The still widely used approach to look for haemochromatosis in the presence of clinical complications such as liver disease will detect haemochromatosis in a considerable percentage of patients with Celtic origin. However, up to one half of these patients will already have an irreversible complication such as liver cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus or cardiomyopathy. In contrast, screening approaches of non-selected asymptomatic subjects using either determination of transferrin saturation and serum ferritin (phenotypic screening) or using genetic testing will detect haemochromatosis in most subjects in a precirrhotic stage without irreversible complications. Both phenotypic and genetic screening are highly cost-effective for detection of iron-loaded individuals in the general population. The current clinical approach to look for haemochromatosis in the presence of clinical disease is unacceptable. Only a more general type of screening in asymptomatic subjects including genetic testing will increase the rate of early diagnosis and will further improve the clinical outcome.

Screening for hemochromatosis

BACKGROUND

Hereditary hemochromatosis is the most common autosomal recessive disorder in populations of northern European descent.

ISSUES

Many experts consider hemochromatosis to be an almost ideal disease for population screening because it essentially fulfills almost all the criteria for screening proposed by the WHO. However, others disagree and suggest that more data are required particularly with regard to the natural history and penetrance of the disease. There is also disagreement about the best diagnostic/screening test for the disease and the performance of these tests in the context of screening. Other concerns are the variability and lack of standardization in screening test measurements, the selection of screening threshold values and the identification of false positive cases. The advent of a genetic test for the condition has brought other worries with regard to informed consent and the ethical, legal and social implications of screening particularly in relation to medical and general discrimination. Other important issues include compliance, cost effectiveness and the evidence that screening has lessened the burden of disease in the community.

CONCLUSIONS

At the present time, we believe that further data regarding both the exact disease burden and the outcomes of screening studies particularly in the general community are required before widespread population screening is introduced.

Estimating the efficacy and efficiency of cascade genetic screening

Screening for genetic variants that predispose individuals or their offspring to disease may be performed at the general population level or may instead be targeted at the relatives of previously identified carriers. The latter strategy has come to be known as "cascade genetic screening." Since the carrier risk of close relatives of known carriers is generally higher than the population risk, cascade screening is more efficient than population screening, in the sense that fewer individuals have to be genotyped per detected carrier. The efficacy of cascade screening, as measured by the overall proportion of carriers detected in a given population, is, however, lower than that of population-wide screening, and the respective inclusion rates vary according to the population frequency and mode of inheritance of the predisposing variants. For dominant mutations, we have developed equations that allow the inclusion rates of cascade screening to be calculated in an iterative fashion, depending upon screening depth and penetrance. For recessive mutations, we derived only equations for the screening of siblings and the children of patients. Owing to their mathematical complexity, it was necessary to study more extended screening strategies by simulation. Cascade screening turned out to result in low inclusion rates (<1%) when aimed at the identification of heterozygous carriers of rare recessive variants. Considerably higher rates are achievable, however, when screening is performed to detect covert homozygotes for frequent recessive mutations with reduced penetrance. This situation is exemplified by hereditary hemochromatosis, for which up to 40% of at-risk individuals may be identifiable through screening of first- to third-degree relatives of overt carriers (i.e., patients); the efficiency of this screening strategy was found to be approximately 50 times higher than that of population-wide screening. For dominant mutations, inclusion rates of cascade screening were estimated to be higher than for recessive variants. Thus, some 80% of all carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation would be detected if screening were to be targeted specifically at first- to third-degree relatives of patients with venous thrombosis. The relative cost efficiency of cascade as compared with population-wide screening (i.e., the overall savings in the extra managerial cost of the condition) is also likely to be higher for dominant than for recessive mutations. This notwithstanding, once screening has become cost-effective at the population level, it can be expected that cascade screening would only transiently represent an economically viable option.

Clinical and genetic heterogeneity in hereditary haemochromatosis: association between lymphocyte counts and expression of iron overload

To identify a new marker of expression of disease, independent of HFE genotype in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis (HHC), the total peripheral blood lymphocyte counts were analysed according to iron status in two groups of subjects with HFE mutations. The groups consisted of 38 homozygotes for C282Y, and 107 heterozygotes for the C282Y or compound heterozygotes for C282Y and H63D. For control purposes, total lymphocyte counts and iron status were also examined in 20 index patients with African dietary iron overload, a condition not associated with HFE mutations, and in 144 members of their families and communities. Mean lymphocyte numbers were lower in C282Y homozygous HHC index subjects with cirrhosis and higher iron stores than in those without cirrhosis and with lower iron burdens [(1.65 +/- 0.43) x 10(6)/mL vs. (2.27 +/- 0.49) x 10(6)/mL; p = 0.008]. Similarly, mean lymphocyte counts were significantly lower in C282Y heterozygotes and C282Y/H63D compound heterozygotes with iron overload and increased serum ferritin concentrations compared to those with normal serum ferritin concentrations (p < 0.05). Statistically significant negative correlations were found, in males, between lymphocyte counts and the total body iron stores, either in C282Y homozygous HHC patients (p = 0.031 in a multiple regression model dependent on age) and in C282Y heterozygotes or C282Y/H63D compound heterozygotes with iron overload (p = 0.029 in a simple linear model). In contrast, lymphocyte counts increased with increasing serum ferritin concentrations among the index subjects with African iron overload (r = 0.324, not statistically significant) and among the members of their families and communities (r = 0.170, p = 0.042). These results suggest that a lower peripheral blood lymphocyte count is associated with a greater degree of iron loading in HFE haemochromatosis but not in African iron overload, and they support the notion that the lymphocyte count may serve as a marker of a non-HFE gene that influences the clinical expression of HFE haemochromatosis.

HFE mutations, iron deficiency and overload in 10,500 blood donors

People with genetic haemochromatosis (GH) accumulate iron from excessive dietary absorption. In populations of northern European origin, over 90% of patients are homozygous for the C282Y mutation of the HFE gene. While about 1 in 200 people in the general population have this genotype the proportion who develop clinical haemochromatosis is not known. The influence of HFE genotype on iron status was investigated in 10 556 blood donors. The allele frequencies of the C282Y and H63D mutations were 8.23% and 15.3% respectively. Heterozygosity for C282Y occurred in 1 in 7.9 donors, for H63D in 1 in 4.2 donors, and 1 in 42 were compound heterozygotes. Homozygosity for H63D occurred in 1 in 42 donors and 1 in 147 (72) were homozygous for C282Y. Mean values increased for transferrin saturation (TS) and serum ferritin (sFn), and decreased for unsaturated iron binding capacity (UIBC) in the order: donors lacking the mutations, H63D heterozygotes, C282Y heterozygotes, H63D homozygotes, compound heterozygotes and C282Y homozygotes, but serum ferritin (sFn) concentrations were no higher in H63D heterozygotes and C282Y heterozygous women than in donors lacking mutations. The percentage of donors failing the screening test for anaemia or of those with sFn < 15 microg/l did not differ among the genotype groups. C282Y and H63D heterozygotes and donors homozygous for H63D were at no greater risk of iron accumulation than donors lacking mutations, of whom 1 in 1200 had both a raised TS and sFn. The risk was higher for compound heterozygotes (1 in 80, P = 0.003) and for C282Y homozygotes (1 in 5, P < 0.0001). There was no correlation between sFn and either age or donation frequency in C282Y homozygotes. None of the 63 C282Y homozygous donors interviewed showed physical signs of overload or were aware of relatives with haemochromatosis. The Welsh Blood Service collects blood from about 140 000 people each year including an estimated 950 who are homozygous for HFE C282Y. They are probably healthy and unaware of any family history of iron overload.

Hemochromatosis-associated morbidity in the United States: an analysis of the National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1979-1997

PURPOSE

The recent discovery of the HFE gene and its association with hereditary hemochromatosis has renewed the attention directed to iron-overload diseases. Population screening for hereditary hemochromatosis is under debate, and population-based estimates of morbidity associated with hereditary hemochromatosis are needed. The purpose of this study is to estimate the number of hemochromatosis-associated hospitalizations in the United States using a population-based dataset.

METHODS

National Hospital Discharge Survey and census data were used to estimate hemochromatosis-associated hospitalization rates for persons 18 years of age and over.

RESULTS

From 1979 through 1997, the rate of hemochromatosis-associated hospitalizations was 2.3 per 100,000 persons in the United States. The rate among persons 60 years of age and over increased more than 60% during this time period.

CONCLUSION

The increase in the rate of hereditary hemochromatosis-associated hospitalizations among older persons is consistent with recent trends in mortality data and may reflect the rising awareness of iron-overload disorders in the United States.

Screening for hemochromatosis in routine medical care: an evaluation of mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin

Our aim was to evaluate the potential utility of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) to detect hemochromatosis. We computed the accuracy of MCV and MCH cut-off points > or = upper reference limits using data from 94 probands and 132 white controls. Our reference ranges are MCV 80.0-97.0 fL and MCH 26.0-32.0 pg. Sensitivity of MCV was 8.6-48.3% for men and 2.8-44.4% for women (cut-off points > or = 105.0 - > or = 97.0 fL, respectively). Sensitivity of MCH was 33.9-70.7% for men and 19.6-50.0% for women (cut-off points > or = 34.0 - > or = 32.0 pg, respectively). Using MCV and a hemochromatosis frequency typical of many western Caucasian populations (0.005), positive predictive values (PV+) were 2.1-100.0% in men and 4.2-100.0% in women. Using MCH, PV+ were 1.7-8.2% in men and 1.8-6.8% in women. We also calculated PV+ using the hemochromatosis frequency 0.015, which could occur in persons receiving medical care. Using MCV cut-off points > or = 101.0 fL, PV+ were 8.9-100.0% in men and 100.0% in women with maximum sensitivities of 24.1% and 25.0%, respectively. Using MCH testing, PV+ was 21.5% in men (cut-off point > or = 34.0 pg) and 18.2% in women (cut-off point > or = 33.0 pg) with sensitivities of 33.9% and 37.0%, respectively. Using MCV or MCH, sensitivity and PV+ for the HFE genotype C282Y/C282Y were generally greater than for "nonclassical" HFE genotypes. All negative predictive values in our study were > or = 98.5%. We conclude that supranormal values of MCV or MCH could be used to detect hemochromatosis in white persons of western European descent who are receiving routine medical care. Comparisons of MCV, MCH, and transferrin saturation testing and other implications of MCV and MCH testing for hemochromatosis in medical care are discussed.

Transferrin saturation phenotype and HFE genotype screening for hemochromatosis and primary iron overload: predictions from a model based on national, racial, and ethnic group composition in central Alabama

There is interest in general population screening for hemochromatosis and other primary iron overload disorders, although not all persons are at equal risk. We developed a model to estimate the numbers of persons in national, racial, or ethnic population subgroups in Jefferson County, Alabama, who would be detected using transferrin saturation (phenotype) or HFE mutation analysis (genotype) screening. Approximately 62% are Caucasians, 37% are African Americans, and the remainder are Hispanics, Asians, or Native Americans. The predicted phenotype frequencies are greatest in a Caucasian subgroup, ethnicity unspecified, which consists predominantly of persons of Scotch and Irish descent (0.0065 men, 0.0046 women), and in African Americans (0.0089 men, 0.0085 women). Frequencies of the HFE genotype C282Y/C282Y > or = 0.0001 are predicted to occur only among Caucasians; the greatest frequency (0.0080) was predicted to occur in the ethnicity-unspecified Caucasian population. C282Y/C282Y frequency estimates were lower in Italian, Greek, and Jewish subgroups. There is excellent agreement in the numbers of the ethnicity-unspecified Caucasians who would be detected using phenotype and genotype criteria. Our model also indicates that phenotyping would identify more persons with primary iron overload than would genotyping in our Italian Caucasian, Hispanic, and African American subgroups. This is consistent with previous observations that indicate that primary iron overload disorders in persons of southern Italian descent and African Americans are largely attributable to non-HFE alleles. Because the proportions of population subgroups and their genetic constitution may differ significantly in other geographic regions, we suggest that models similar to the present one be constructed to predict optimal screening strategies for primary iron overload disorders.

Population screening in hereditary hemochromatosis

Hemochromatosis is a common autosomal recessive condition found in the homozygous state in 1/200-1/400 people of northern-, central-, and western-European origin. It causes increased iron storage, which may lead to liver cirrhosis, liver cancer, heart disease, arthritis, and diabetes in many but not all affected adults, with a higher frequency in males. The condition is easily treated by repeated venesections without side effects but is frequently overlooked. Population screening of adults using iron indices alone or combined with DNA testing has therefore been recommended, but a consensus conference in 1997 recommended that such screening be deferred, owing to uncertainty regarding the extent of clinical disease that may develop in individuals detected by such programs. There was also concern that DNA screening results might be used for discrimination in insurance and occupational settings. Screening family members of patients with evidence of definite iron loading, however, is accepted by all observers. Because serious complications may be overlooked, a more aggressive stance toward case detection in the adult population has been advocated by some observers, realizing that unnecessary treatment might occur. Because additional information regarding the spectrum of clinical disease in homozygotes in now accumulating, a consensus conference in the near future is suggested to consider appropriate policies.

Early detection of genetic hemochromatosis: should all young adults be offered the genetic test?

Genetic hemochromatosis (GH) is a late-onset, autosomal recessive disorder. The majority of those at risk from iron overload and its clinical consequences may be detected by a simple genetic test. Furthermore, treatment by phlebotomy, if instituted early, removes excess iron and prevents the complications of iron overload which include arthralgia, diabetes, and cirrhosis of the liver. GH seems to be an obvious candidate for inclusion in national screening programs. However, important questions remain concerning the proportion of individuals with the high-risk genotype who eventually show clinical manifestations of iron overload and the significance of heterozygosity for haemochromatosis in terms of morbidity. Until these questions are resolved, the introduction of widespread genetic screening cannot be justified.

Hereditary hemochromatosis: impact of molecular and iron-based testing on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a common, chronic disease

OBJECTIVE

To review the current state-of-the-art regarding the role of iron- and DNA-based testing on the detection, treatment, and prevention of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH), the most common single-gene disorder in white people.

SOURCES

Review of the medical literature, with particular emphasis on recent reports of the impact of DNA-based testing on the detection of symptomatic and presymptomatic patients with HH.

CONCLUSIONS

Hereditary hemochromatosis, a common autosomal recessive iron overload disorder (with a population prevalence of 0.3%-0.8%), is a common cause of preventable liver, heart, joint, and endocrine disease. Since the associated clinical signs and symptoms are nonspecific, an accurate HH diagnosis demands both a high index of suspicion and the direct laboratory demonstration of elevated iron parameters. The substantial public health burden of HH as a common, deadly, detectable, and treatable chronic disease has led the College of American Pathologists to recommend that "systematic screening for hemochromatosis is warranted for all persons over the age of 20 years." The recent discovery that most HH cases are the result of a single well-conserved homozygous missense mutation (C282Y) within a novel transferrin-receptor binding protein (HFE) has given rise to diagnostic clinical tests for the DNA-based detection of this pathologic mutation. This direct HFE mutation test can now be used not only to confirm the diagnosis of HH in those with symptomatic disease, but also, perhaps more importantly, to detect those with presymptomatic iron overload in whom future disease manifestations may be prevented (with phlebotomy therapy).

Screening for hereditary hemochromatosis: are DNA-based tests the answer?

Universal screening for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) has been proposed by many experts, with understandable enthusiasm: HH can cause fatal complications, which are preventable with early treatment. The disorder involves excess iron accumulation that can result in tissue iron overload, with secondary cirrhosis, diabetes, heart failure, impotence and arthritis. These complications are preceded by years of iron accumulation, and most are believed to be preventable by removal of excess iron by phlebotomy. Thus, early identification and treatment - the quintessential functions of health screening - seem to make sense for HH. However, the available screening tests are imperfect. While they can identify many persons at increased risk from HH, the proportion that will develop serious clinical manifestations related to iron overload is not known with certainty. DNA-based tests do not provide a simple resolution to these questions.

A survey of phlebotomy among persons with hemochromatosis

BACKGROUND

One in 10 whites in the United States is a carrier for hemochromatosis and an estimated 1 in 200 is clinically affected. Early treatment with therapeutic phlebotomy to remove excess iron can prevent associated chronic diseases. However, little information is available on the amount of blood withdrawn or the rates of withdrawal from hemochromatosis patients. The patterns of therapeutic phlebotomy and the magnitude of charges in persons with hemochromatosis were surveyed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Surveys were mailed to persons with hemochromatosis identified by health care providers, blood centers, patient advocacy groups, and the Internet. There were 2362 respondents to the survey from the United States.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven percent of respondents reported being voluntary blood donors prior to diagnosis. The mean rate of therapeutic phlebotomy for iron depletion was 2.6 units per month (mean duration, 13 months). The mean rate of maintenance phlebotomy was 0.5 units per month. Therapeutic phlebotomy rates varied by sex, age, reason for diagnosis, and severity of symptoms. Seventy-six percent of respondents reported full or partial insurance coverage of therapeutic phlebotomy charges. Seventy-six percent received therapeutic phlebotomy services in a hospital or physician's office and 30 percent in a blood center. Charges for therapeutic phlebotomy varied by site, with a mean cost of $90 in hospitals and $52 in blood centers. Fifty-four percent of respondents attempted to donate blood after their diagnosis but were excluded.

CONCLUSION

The amount of blood withdrawn from persons with hemochromatosis is substantial. The location where patients received phlebotomy services appears to be influenced by charges and time since diagnosis.

Screening for hemochromatosis. A public health perspective

CONTEXT

The discovery of the HFE gene in 1996 has introduced DNA testing as a possible tool for screening and diagnosis of hemochromatosis and increased interest in the disorder. Population screening using transferrin saturation has been advocated by experts to permit early detection and treatment with phlebotomy before the onset of clinical disease.

METHODS

Based on a literature review, we consider the relative risks and merits of two screening tests as part of a broader look at the evidence required for the recommendation of universal screening for hemochromatosis.

RESULTS

Several questions must be answered before universal screening can be recommended. Uncertainties remain about the penetrance and preventable disease burden, laboratory standardization, and optimal strategies to minimize potential risks of screening for hemochromatosis.

CONCLUSIONS

As a common genetic disorder with simple, effective therapy, hemochromatosis offers a model for other genetically influenced chronic diseases that some day may have interventions to improve prognosis. Resolution of questions related to prevention of chronic diseases from hemochromatosis, therefore, will have broad usefulness in the future.

Hereditary hemochromatosis. Preventing chronic effects of this underdiagnosed disorder

Hereditary hemochromatosis, once thought to be rare, is the most common genetic disorder in the United States. Nonetheless, the condition often goes undetected and untreated until its severe effects have become apparent. What clues can lead you to the diagnosis, and how can you spot them in your patients, before significant morbidity has occurred? In this article, Drs McDonnell and Witte discuss the diagnosis and management of this underrecognized problem as well as the various issues involved in screening. An illustrative case of hemochromatosis is also included.

Mild liver enzyme abnormalities: eliminating hemochromatosis as cause

Chronic mild liver enzyme abnormalities are attributable to hereditary hemochromatosis in at least 3% of cases. Hemochromatosis formerly was diagnosed late with diabetes and hepatic and cardiac failure. Only recently have the autosomal recessive inheritance and subtle early presentations been understood. However, patients still wait many years and see many physicians before receiving a correct diagnosis. Increased serum transferrin saturation is currently the best test for detection of those likely to accumulate iron. Serum ferritin identifies those requiring treatment. When liver biopsy (controversial in asymptomatic individuals) is indicated, chemical measurement of liver iron content is helpful and therapeutic phlebotomy is the only effective treatment. Caucasian-type hemochromatosis (prevalence of 0.005) is associated with genetic abnormalities in HLA-H but also occurs in other ethnic groups. Those of African descent may have a different but also heritable iron-loading disease. Caucasian-type and to a lesser extent African iron loading are detectable early by laboratory testing. Early treatment restores normal expectations of length and quality of life in the Caucasian disease. Long-term treatment data are not yet available in African iron loading. Laboratory-initiated screening programs using unsaturated iron-binding capacity can eliminate symptomatic hemochromatosis.

Population screening for haemochromatosis: a unifying analysis of published intervention trials

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of population screening for haemochromatosis by analysing the screening performance of seven intervention trials, and to compare this with the expected performance derived from family studies.

SETTING

Seven population intervention trials carried out between 1983 and 1995 in Australia, Scandinavia, Iceland, and the United State.

METHODS

Seven of 23 English language trials identified were suitable for the meta-analysis. Transferrin saturation and serum ferritin measurements derived from family studies were used to predict detection and false positive rates for each trial.

RESULTS

The seven trials used various screening and diagnostic criteria. A total of 18,396 men and 12,254 women were screened. Because some cases were not detected by screening, and some screen positive individuals did not complete diagnostic testing, the prevalence of homozygous individuals was underestimated in all the trials. The reported and predicted percentages of screen positive individuals nearly always agreed. The homozygote prevalence was estimated to be 34 men and 40 women per 10,000 (prevalence predicted from family studies is 53 per 10,000). Clinical manifestations were present in 50% of male and 44% of female homozygotes.

CONCLUSIONS

False positive rates, homozygote prevalences, and frequency of clinical manifestations were in general agreement with predictions from family studies. However, incomplete understanding about a number of issues requires that further pilot trials be carried out before screening can be considered part of routine medical practice.