Intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) for cancer pain management: a review and updates

Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Pain Medicine: Results of a National Palliative Physician Survey

CONTEXT

Pain is a prevalent symptom in patients with serious illness and often requires interventional approaches for adequate treatment. Little is known about referral patterns and collaborative attitudes of palliative physicians regarding pain management specialists.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate referral rates, co-management strategies, and beliefs of palliative physicians about the value of Pain Medicine specialists in patients with serious illness.

METHODS

A 30-question survey with demographic, referral/practice, and attitudes/belief questions was mailed to 1000 AAHPM physician members. Responses were characterized with descriptive statistics and further analyzed for associations between training experiences, practice environment, and educational activities with collaborative practice patterns and beliefs.

RESULTS

The response rate was 52.6%. Most survey respondents had initial board certification primarily in internal medicine (n = 286, 56%) or family medicine (n = 144, 28%). A minority of respondents had completed a formal ABMS Hospice and Palliative Medicine fellowship (n = 178, 34%). Respondents had been in practice for a median of nine years, (range 1-38 years) primarily in community hospitals (n = 249, 47%) or academic hospitals (n = 202, 38%). The variables best associated with collaborative practices and attitudes was practice in an academic hospital setting and participation in regular joint academic conferences with pain medicine clinicians.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that Palliative Care physicians have highly positive attitudes toward Pain Medicine specialists, but referrals remain low. Facilitating professional collaboration via joint educational/clinical sessions is one possible solution to drive ongoing interprofessional care in patients with complex pain.

Differences in efficacy and safety between intrathecal infusion devices in cancer pain

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal infusion therapy is widely accepted for cancer pain patients when conventional analgesic treatments are not sufficient. There are different types of devices for carrying out this therapy: partially externalized devices (PED), used when life expectancy is under 3 months, and totally implanted devices (TID), when it is larger. Our objective is to compare the efficacy, functionality, and complication rate in both types.

METHODS

We included 132 patients with mild-severe cancer pain, treated with intrathecal infusion therapy by fixed flow devices, PED, or TID, during the study time. Demographic, physical oncologic, and pain control data of the patients were recorded prior to starting therapy and at months 1, 3, and 6. Functionality status and complications were also collected from the patient's medical records and clinical files.

RESULTS

Pain control improved after starting therapy, with an overall reduction of 4.75 points in VAS score at 1 month in the both groups, without significant differences between them, keeping it at 3 months and 6. 33.3% of the patients developed complications and were more frequent in the PED group, being catheter dislocation the most common. Patients with TID required more often hospital admission to solve the complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal infusion therapy has been shown to be a very effective and safe therapy for the treatment of moderate to severe oncologic pain. There are no significant differences between PED and TID in terms of degree of pain control, therapeutic success, efficacy on episodic or nocturnal pain, or the presence of serious complications.

Predictive factors for efficacy and safety of intrathecal infusion devices for oncological pain

Introduction

In an important percentage of intrathecal infusion therapy, the pain after implantation of a spinal device does not improve. Our objective is to identify factors that can predict therapeutic success and complications, developing a predictive model based on univariate and multivariate analyses.

Methods

Retrospective observational study, including 132 patients with oncological pain who were implanted with a fixed-flow device for intrathecal infusion. Four time points were established for data collection and, in addition to demographic and anthropometric data, variables related to oncologic pain pathology, initiation of therapy, pain control and complications were collected. Based on univariate and multivariate analyses, we performed predictive models on efficacy and complications.

Results

The mean baseline pain intensity was VAS 7.78, and when comparing the values before implantation with those at month 1, we observed an overall decrease of 4.75 points, maintained at months 3 and 6. Nocturnal pain progressively decreased in incidence from 50.0% before implantation to 21.8%, 9.1% and 4.3% at 1, 3 and 6 months. Episodic pain was present in 90.1% of the patients before implantation (7.79 episodes/day), and at 6 months the incidence remained at 53.8%. Most of the patients (66.6%) had no complications related to therapy. We constructed a highly significant multivariate model for the efficacy of the therapy with a predictive capacity of 30.2% and composed of factors: absence of nocturnal pain before implantation and clinical improvement on day 2 after implant. Regarding the prediction of complications, it was not possible to achieve a significantly multivariate effective model.

Conclusion

We identify two factors that predict therapeutic success in a multivariate model: the absence of nocturnal pain before implantation and the improvement of pain on the second day after implantation.

Interventional Treatment Modalities for Chronic Abdominal and Pelvic Visceral Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic abdominal and pelvic visceral pain is an oftentimes difficult to treat pain condition that requires a multidisciplinary approach. This article specifically reviews the interventional treatment options for pain resulting from visceral abdominal and pelvic pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sympathetic nerve blocks are the main interventional option for the treatment of chronic abdominal and pelvic visceral pain. Initially, nerve blocks are performed, and subsequently, neurolytic injections (alcohol or phenol) are longer term options. This review describes different techniques for sympathetic blockade. Neuromodulation is a potential option via dorsal column stimulation or dorsal root ganglion stimulation. Finally, intrathecal drug delivery is sometimes appropriate for refractory cases. This paper will review interventional options for the treatment of chronic abdominal and pelvic visceral pain.

Sustained release ketamine-loaded porous silicon-PLGA microparticles prepared by an optimized supercritical CO2 process

Ketamine in sub-anaesthetic doses has analgesic properties and an opioid-sparing effect. Intrathecal (i.t.) delivery of analgesics bypasses systemic metabolism and delivers the analgesic agent adjacent to the target receptors in the spinal cord and so small doses are required to achieve effective pain relief. In order to relieve intractable cancer-related pain, sustained-release ketamine formulations are required in combination with a strong opioid because frequent i.t. injection is not practical. In this study, ketamine or ketamine-loaded porous silicon (pSi) were encapsulated into poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microparticles by a novel supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) method, thereby avoiding the use of organic solvent. Multiple parameters including theoretical drug loading (DL), presence of pSi, size of scCO2 vessel, PLGA type, and use of co-solvent were investigated with a view to obtaining high DL and a sustained-release for an extended period. The most important finding was that the use of a large scCO2 vessel (60 mL) resulted in a much higher encapsulation efficiency (EE) compared with a small vessel (12 mL). In addition, pre-loading ketamine into pSi slightly improved the level of drug incorporation (i.e. EE and DL). Although the in vitro release was mainly affected by the drug payload, the use of the large scCO2 vessel reduced the burst release and extended the release period for PLGA microparticles with 10% or 20% ketamine loading. Together, our findings provide valuable information for optimization of drug delivery systems prepared with the aid of scCO2.

Intrathecal catheter implantation decreases cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in cynomolgus monkeys

A detailed understanding of the CSF dynamics is needed for design and optimization of intrathecal drug delivery devices, drugs, and protocols. Preclinical research using large-animal models is important to help define drug pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics and safety. In this study, we investigated the impact of catheter implantation in the sub-dural space on CSF flow dynamics in Cynomolgus monkeys. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed before and after catheter implantation to quantify the differences based on catheter placement location in the cervical compared to the lumbar spine. Several geometric and hydrodynamic parameters were calculated based on the 3D segmentation and flow analysis. Hagen-Poiseuille equation was used to investigate the impact of catheter implantation on flow reduction and hydraulic resistance. A linear mixed-effects model was used in this study to investigate if there was a statistically significant difference between cervical and lumbar implantation, or between two MRI time points. Results showed that geometric parameters did not change statistically across MRI measurement time points and did not depend on catheter location. However, catheter insertion did have a significant impact on the hydrodynamic parameters and the effect was greater with cervical implantation compared to lumbar implantation. CSF flow rate decreased up to 55% with the catheter located in the cervical region. The maximum flow rate reduction in the lumbar implantation group was 21%. Overall, lumbar catheter implantation disrupted CSF dynamics to a lesser degree than cervical catheter implantation and this effect remained up to two weeks post-catheter implantation in Cynomolgus monkeys.

Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Therapy via a Percutaneous Port for Refractory Cancer Pain in China: An Efficacy, Safety and Cost Utilization Analysis

Purpose

Intrathecal morphine infusion therapy via a percutaneous port (IMITPP) has been used widely for its relatively low initial cost. However, there is scarce knowledge about IMITPP. In this study, we sought to evaluate efficacy, complications, and the interval required to achieve the cost equivalence of IMITPP in patients with refractory cancer pain in China.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on cancer patients who had received IMITPP at our hospital between April 2017 and April 2019. Data from the numeric pain rating scale and Karnofsky performance scores, and complications and costs related to IMITPP were collected from medical records. Daily analgesic costs before and after IMITPP were calculated based on the doses of opioids on admission and at discharge, respectively. The doses of systemic opioids before IMITPP were stratified into very high doses [VHD, oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) >599 mg/day], high doses (HD, 300 mg/day ≤ OMED ≤ 599 mg/day), and regular doses (RD, OMED < 300 mg/day).

Results

Intrathecal morphine infusion therapy via a percutaneous port provided significant pain relief, but impaired activities of daily living in patients with refractory cancer pain. The commonly reported complications included nausea/vomiting and urinary retention, most of which were managed with symptomatic therapies. The median interval required to achieve cost equivalence was 11.44 months. The median intervals of VHD group and HD group were significantly shorter than that of RD group.

Conclusion

Intrathecal morphine infusion therapy via a percutaneous port provided effective cancer pain management without causing serious complications. Patients with higher doses of systemic opioids would economically benefit from IMITPP in a shorter time.

Elastic net of polyurethane strands for sustained delivery of triamcinolone around silicone implants of various sizes

We propose an elastic net made of a biocompatible polymer to wrap silicone implants of various sizes, which also allows for the sustained release of an anti-inflammatory drug, triamcinolone, to prevent fibrosis. For this, we first prepared a strand composed of a mixture of polyurethane and triamcinolone via electrospinning, which was then assembled to prepare the elastic drug-delivery net (DDN). The DDN was prepared to just fit for wrapping the small silicone implant sample herein, but was also able to wrap a sample 7 times as large at 72% strain due to the elastic property of polyurethane. The DDN exhibited sustained drug release for 4 weeks, the profile of which was not very different between the intact and strained DDNs. When implanted in a subcutaneous pocket in living rats, the DDN-wrapped silicone implant samples showed an obvious antifibrotic effect due to the sustained release of triamcinolone. Importantly, this effect was similar for the small and large silicone samples, both wrapped with the same DDN. Therefore, we conclude that this drug-loaded net made of an elastic, biocompatible polymer has high potential for sustained drug delivery around silicone implants manufactured in various sizes.

Role of primary care physicians in intrathecal pain management: a narrative review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

The majority of patients seeking medical care for chronic pain consult a primary care physician (PCP). Because systemic opioids are commonly prescribed to patients with chronic pain, PCPs are attempting to balance the competing priorities of providing adequate pain relief while reducing risks for opioid misuse and overdose. It is important for PCPs to be aware of pain management strategies other than systemic opioid dose escalation when patients with chronic pain fail to respond to conservative therapies and to initiate a multimodal treatment plan.

METHODS

The Medline database and evidence-based treatment guidelines were searched to identify publications on intrathecal (IT) therapy for the management of chronic pain. Selection of publications relevant to PCPs was based on the authors' clinical and research expertise.

RESULTS

IT administration delivers analgesic medication directly into the cerebrospinal fluid, avoiding first-pass effect and bypassing the blood-brain barrier, thereby requiring lower medication doses. Morphine, a µ-opioid receptor agonist, and ziconotide, a non-opioid, selective N-type calcium channel blocker, are the only analgesics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat chronic refractory pain by the IT route. Patients who are potential candidates for IT therapy may benefit from evaluation by an interventional pain physician. PCPs can play an important role in patient selection and referral for IT therapy and provide ongoing collaborative care for patients receiving IT therapy, including monitoring for efficacy and adverse events and facilitating communication with the treating specialist.

CONCLUSIONS

Collaboration between PCPs and pain specialists may improve outcomes of and patient satisfaction with IT therapy and other interventional treatments.

Intrathecal pain management: a team-based approach

Objective

Physician assistants (PAs), nurse practitioners (NPs), and registered nurses (RNs) provide professional services on pain management teams. This review provides an overview of the practical management of chronic pain with intrathecal (IT) therapy using an interprofessional approach (eg, physicians and other health care professionals), with a focus on the contributions of PAs, NPs, and RNs.

Methods

Narrative review based on literature searches of the Medline database and treatment guidelines on the use of IT therapy in the management of patients with chronic pain.

Results

The specific roles and responsibilities of PAs, NPs, and RNs in the management of patients receiving IT therapy vary by practice. In many pain treatment centers, PAs, NPs, and RNs are responsible for patient education, postimplant maintenance, and ongoing supportive care of patients receiving IT therapy. Topics that we address include patient selection, patient expectations and goal setting, medication selection, outcome assessment, and treatment adjustment. Currently, morphine and ziconotide (a nonopioid, selective N-type calcium channel blocker) are the only agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for IT analgesia. We provide relevant information on the dosing, titration, and adverse effect management of these medications for PAs, NPs, and RNs responsible for administering IT therapy.

Conclusion

PAs, NPs, and RNs are valuable members of IT pain management teams. Treatment success requires ongoing monitoring of efficacy and adverse effects, with corresponding adjustments to medication selection and dosing, in addition to good communication among the health care professionals involved in patient care.

Advances in intrathecal drug delivery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Targeted intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are an option in algorithms for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe chronic refractory pain. This article is intended to review the literature regarding IDDS published over the last year, with special attention to the Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2012.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recommendations made by the Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2012 are reviewed. Separate considerations of intrathecal drug therapy for neuropathic and nociceptive pain syndromes and the new concept of 'microdosing' are discussed in this article.

SUMMARY

This review includes the recommendations for the use of IDDS, trialing, and recent reports of complications (especially, the occurrence of granulomas). In addition, the latest documents on cerebrospinal fluid and potential lines of future development are discussed.

Intrathecal Therapy for Cancer-Related Pain

Objective. The increasing incidence of cancer survivorship has shifted treatment of cancer-related pain from short-term analgesia to long-term chronic pain management. As a result, alternatives to oral analgesics, such as intrathecal therapy, may be beneficial for patients with cancer-related pain. The authors review the use of intrathecal therapy in the management of cancer-related pain.

Methods. The Medline database was searched for English-language articles that included “ziconotide” or “morphine” AND (“cancer” OR “malignant”) AND “intrathecal” in title or abstract. Available abstracts from scientific congresses in the areas of neuromodulation and oncology were also reviewed.

Results. Intrathecal therapy provides pain relief with reduced systemic concerns in patients with cancer-related pain. Patients should undergo multidisciplinary evaluation and, in most cases, drug trialing before intrathecal pump implantation. Morphine, an opioid (µ-opioid receptor antagonist), and ziconotide, a nonopioid (selective N-type calcium channel inhibitor), are both approved for intrathecal analgesia; however, tolerance and safety concerns may deter the use of intrathecal morphine. Ziconotide has also shown efficacy for reduction of cancer-related pain; however, proper dosing and titration must be used to prevent adverse events. There is little information available on use of intrathecal therapies specifically in cancer survivors.

Conclusions. Treatment of cancer-related pain has shifted toward chronic pain management strategies, especially among cancer survivors. Intrathecal therapy provides an alternate route of administration of chronic pain medications (e.g., morphine and ziconotide) for cancer patients with and without active disease, although additional research is needed to support effectiveness in cancer survivors.

Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Therapy in Management of Chronic Pain: Present and Future Implementation in Korea

PURPOSE

Intrathecal morphine pump (ITMP) infusion therapy is efficient in managing malignant and nonmalignant chronic pain refractory to standard treatment. However, the high cost of an ITMP is the greatest barrier for starting a patient on ITMP infusion therapy. Using the revised Korean reimbursement guidelines, we investigated the cost effectiveness of ITMP infusion therapy and conducted a patient survey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 12 patients who underwent ITMP implantation was performed. Morphine dose escalation rates were calculated, and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores were compared before and after ITMP implantation. We surveyed patients who were already using an ITMP as well as those who were candidates for an ITMP. All survey data were collected through in-person interviews over 3 months. Data on the cost of medical treatment were collected and projected over time.

RESULTS

The NRS score decreased during the follow-up period. The median morphine dose increased by 36.9% over the first year, and the median time required to reach a financial break-even point was 24.2 months. Patients were more satisfied with the efficacy of ITMP infusion therapy than with conventional therapy. The expected cost of ITMP implantation was KRW 4000000-5000000 in more than half of ITMP candidates scheduled to undergo implantation.

CONCLUSION

The high cost of initiating ITMP infusion therapy is challenging; however, the present results may encourage more patients to consider ITMP therapy.

Current perspectives on intrathecal drug delivery

Advances in intrathecal analgesia and intrathecal drug delivery systems have allowed for a range of medications to be used in the control of pain and spasticity. This technique allows for reduced medication doses that can decrease the side effects typically associated with oral or parenteral drug delivery. Recent expert panel consensus guidelines have provided care paths in the treatment of nociceptive, neuropathic, and mixed pain syndromes. While the data for pain relief, adverse effect reduction, and cost-effectiveness with cancer pain control are compelling, the evidence is less clear for noncancer pain, other than spasticity. Physicians should be aware of mechanical, pharmacological, surgical, and patient-specific complications, including possible granuloma formation. Newer intrathecal drug delivery systems may allow for better safety and quality of life outcomes.

An overview of treatment strategies for cancer pain with a focus on interventional strategies and techniques

SUMMARY As the incidence of cancer increases, considerations for pain treatments become more important and varied. While traditional views on pain therapy are successful in treating the majority of cancer-related pain, a continuum has developed to include interventional strategies in addition to pharmacologic management. Further improvements in understanding anatomy in the context of imaging and pathophysiology of cancer-pain syndromes direct our current interventional pain management options. We discuss the current interventional treatment options regularly used in the cancer-pain population.

Intrathecal delivery of analgesics

Targeted intrathecal (IT) drug delivery systems (IDDS) are an option in algorithms for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe chronic refractory pain when more conservative options fail. This therapy is well established and supported by several publications. It has shown efficacy and is an important tool for the treatment of spasticity, and both cancer and nonmalignant pain. Recent technological advances, new therapeutic applications, reported complications, and the costs as well as maintenance required for this therapy require the need to stay up-to-date about new recommendations that may improve outcomes. This chapter reviews all technological issues regarding IDDS implantation with follow-up, and pharmacological recommendations published during recent years that provide evidence-based decision making process in the management of chronic pain and spasticity in patients.

Recent advances in cancer pain management

Pain is the most feared symptom of cancer. New oncological cancer treatments are improving survival, but advanced cancer presents challenges that have not been seen before, often with pain that is very difficult to manage because of a recurrent tumour that is invading the central nervous system. In some of the older interventional techniques of destroying nerve pathways, expertise has diminished or has been deemed unnecessary with the development of specialist palliative care. Not all pain is managed adequately with the analgesic ladder. Knowledge of pain mechanisms, careful assessment and selection of the right technique at the right time will enhance cancer pain management. New techniques include intrathecal drug therapy, vertebroplasty, cordotomy, ultra-sound guided nerve blocks, neuromodulation and advances in drug therapies.