Disentangling Consumer and Provider Predictors of Advance Care Planning

Impact of Chronic Conditions, Healthcare Utilization, and Demographics on Advance Care Planning

Context: Unraveling the intricacies of what factors influence advance care planning (ACP) is an ongoing research challenge. Research shows much ACP is crisis-based and takes place at the end of life. Complicating this late-stage approach may be demographic differences based on race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Objective: We examined the relationship between demographic factors, chronic health conditions, and healthcare utilization in predicting who was most likely to engage in ACP activities, including designating a durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPOAHC), having a living will, and discussing wishes with family or others. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis using 2018 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) exit data provided by a proxy for the deceased participant that matched the 2016 survey participant data (N = 884). Generalized linear mixed models were used for the analysis. Results: The number of chronic health conditions and healthcare utilization were not associated with ACP activities, but several of the demographic variables showed strong associations. Participants who were female, white, older, and from a higher socioeconomic status were more likely to have engaged in ACP. Conclusion: People continue to defer ACP discussions and documentation end of life or when facing medical crises. More needs to be done to reach out to younger adults, racial minorities, and those with lower socioeconomic status to encourage them to engage in ACP.

Multi-Site Study of Provider Self-Efficacy and Beliefs in Explaining Judgments About Need and Responsibility for Advance Care Planning

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We examined the impact of advance care planning (ACP) self-efficacy and beliefs in explaining skilled nursing facility (SNF) provider judgments about resident need and provider responsibility for initiating ACP conversations.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This observational multi-site study of 348 registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and social workers within 29 SNFs used an anonymous survey in which providers judged vignettes with assigned situational features of a typical SNF resident. Mixed modeling was used to analyze the vignette responses.

RESULTS

Providers who had more negative beliefs about ACP were less likely to judge residents in need of ACP and less likely to feel responsible for ensuring ACP took place. Self-efficacy did not have a significant impact on judgments of need, but did significantly increase judgments of responsibility for ensuring ACP conversations. Providers with the highest levels of ACP self-efficacy were most likely to feel responsible for ensuring ACP conversations. In an exploratory analysis, these relationships remained the same whether responding to high or low risk residents (i.e., based on risk of hospitalization, type of diagnosis, functional status, and rate of declining health).

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Both negative beliefs about ACP and self-efficacy in one's ability to conduct ACP discussions were associated with professional judgments regarding ACP. The findings illustrate the importance of addressing negative beliefs about ACP and increasing provider ACP self-efficacy through education and policies that empower nurses and social workers.

Spanish Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Perceived self-efficacy in advance care planning (ACP) is frequently used to measure the impact of ACP programs for professionals responsible for advanced chronic patients. A validated ACP Self-Efficacy (ACP-SE) scale is not currently available in Spanish. Objective: To culturally adapt and validate Baughman's ACP-SE scale into Spanish (ACP-SEs). Methodology/Design: An instrumental study was performed in two phases: (1) cultural adaptation of the ACP-SE scale and (2) psychometric properties measurement. Setting/Participants: The survey was sent to 5785 professionals: physicians, nurses, psychologists, and social workers, members of scientific associations in the areas of primary care, geriatrics, and palliative care in Catalonia, Spain. Results: Five hundred thirty-eight questionnaires were obtained, respondents were physicians (69.0%) and nurses (28.4%) and mean age was 47 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.1). Most were women (79.6%), 68% had >15 years of professional experience, and 80.7% worked in primary care. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and showed a unidimensional structure explaining 56.2% of total variance. Mean score was 67.37 (SD = 16.1). Variables associated with greater self-efficacy were previous training (t = -3.23, df = 273.76, p = 0.001), previous participation in ACP processes (t = -6.23, df = 521, p < 0.001), and membership in geriatric or palliative care scientific association (p < 0.001). ACP-SEs positively correlated to other compared scales. Conclusion: The ACP-SE scale demonstrates adequate psychometric properties. This is the first self-efficacy scale for ACP in Spanish. It should facilitate a better understanding of implementation processes related to ACP programs for professionals involved in caring for patients with advanced diseases.

Patient and Professional Factors That Impact the Perceived Likelihood and Confidence of Healthcare Professionals to Discuss Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Deactivation in Advanced Heart Failure: Results From an International Factorial Survey

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background:

Rate of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantations is increasing in patients with advanced heart failure. Despite clear guideline recommendations, discussions addressing deactivation occur infrequently.

Aim:

The aim of this article is to explore patient and professional factors that impact perceived likelihood and confidence of healthcare professionals to discuss ICD deactivation.

Methods and Results:

Between 2015 and 2016, an international sample of 262 healthcare professionals (65% nursing, 24% medical) completed an online factorial survey, encompassing a demographic questionnaire and clinical vignettes. Each vignette had 9 randomly manipulated and embedded patient-related factors, considered as independent variables, providing 1572 unique vignettes for analysis. These factors were determined through synthesis of a systematic literature review, a retrospective case note review, and a qualitative exploratory study. Results showed that most healthcare professionals agreed that deactivation discussions should be initiated by a cardiologist (95%, n = 255) or a specialist nurse (81%, n = 215). In terms of experience, 84% of cardiologists (n = 53) but only 30% of nurses (n = 50) had previously been involved in a deactivation decision. Healthcare professionals valued patient involvement in deactivation decisions; however, only 50% (n = 130) actively involved family members. Five of 9 clinical factors were associated with an increased likelihood to discuss deactivation including advanced age, severe heart failure, presence of malignancy, receipt of multiple ICD shocks, and more than 3 hospital admissions during the previous year. Furthermore, nationality and discipline significantly influenced likelihood and confidence in decision making.

Conclusions:

Guidelines recommend that healthcare professionals discuss ICD deactivation; however, practice is suboptimal with multifactorial factors impacting on decision making. The role and responsibility of nurses in discussing deactivation require clarity and improvement.

CE: Original Research: Advance Care Planning: An Exploration of the Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Education, and Practices of RNs and LPNs

: Objective: This study compared the advance care planning (ACP)-related beliefs, sense of self-efficacy, education, and practices of RNs and LPNs.

METHODS

Data were extrapolated from a larger multisite study that was conducted across seven counties in one midwestern state. The sample consisted of RNs and LPNs working in 29 urban skilled nursing facilities in zip code areas with greater than 10% African American residents. The survey tool, a self-administered written questionnaire, gathered data on participants' demographics and ACP-related beliefs, sense of self-efficacy, education, and practices. The two main outcome variables were the percentage of residents with whom a nurse discussed ACP and the timing of the most recent such discussion.

RESULTS

A total of 136 RNs and 178 LPNs completed the survey. Multivariate mixed-model analysis of the two main outcome variables showed that negative beliefs were not significantly associated with the percentage of residents with whom nurses discussed ACP but were significantly associated with the timing of the most recent ACP discussion. Having higher levels of ACP-related self-efficacy and education were significantly and positively associated with both outcome variables. RNs and LPNs did not differ significantly in their ACP-related beliefs, but RNs reported significantly higher levels of self-efficacy and education than LPNs did.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a paucity of research comparing RNs and LPNs regarding their ACP practices in skilled nursing facilities. Better education and policies that empower nurses to take a more active role are critical to increasing conversations about ACP. Further research exploring how the complementary roles of RNs and LPNs can be used to improve ACP processes and inform ACP policies is needed.

Advance Care Planning in Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Multisite Examination of Professional Judgments

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Lack of advance care planning (ACP) may increase hospitalizations and impact the quality of life for skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents, especially African American residents who may be less likely to receive ACP discussions. We examined the professional judgments of SNF providers to see if race of SNF residents and providers, and risk for hospitalization for residents influenced professional judgments as to when ACP was needed and feelings of responsibility for ensuring ACP discussions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Nurses and social workers (n = 350) within 29 urban SNFs completed surveys and rated vignettes describing eight typical SNF residents. Linear mixed modeling was used to examine factors that impacted ratings of need for ACP and responsibility for ensuring ACP.

RESULTS

Neither the race of the provider, resident, nor the interaction of the two were associated with either outcome variable. In contrast, providers rated (on a 9-point scale) residents at high risk for hospitalization as more in need of ACP (estimate = 0.86, confidence interval [CI] 0.65, 1.07) and felt more responsible for ensuring ACP (estimate = 0.60, CI 0.42, 0.78).

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Research on ACP is continuing to evolve and these results show the primacy of disease trajectory variables on providers' judgments about ACP. Differences between providers indicate a need for stronger policies and education. Further, research comparing rural, suburban, and urban SNFs is needed to explore possible forms of structural racism such as residential and SNF segregation.

A broader understanding of care managers' attitudes of advance care planning: A concurrent nested design

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To examine barriers of advance care planning (ACP) experienced by care managers (CMs) through a mixed methods approach. A concurrent nested design was used to acquire a deeper understanding of ACP and to identify nuances between quantitative and qualitative data.

BACKGROUND

Past quantitative studies on providers have identified barriers related to time, culture, knowledge, responsibility and availability of legal documents. These barriers, and accompanying attitudes and feelings, have been taken at face value without rich qualitative data to identify under what conditions and to what extent a barrier impacts care.

DESIGN

A two-part multisite, mixed methods study was conducted using surveys and focus groups.

METHODS

Surveys were completed by 458 CMs at 10 Area Agencies on Aging and 62 participated in one of eight focus groups. Data were analysed using a concurrent nested design with individual data analysis and a merged data approach.

RESULTS

There were three main distinctions between the quantitative and qualitative data. First, while CMs reported on the survey that ACP was not too time consuming, focus group data revealed that time was an issue especially related to competing priorities. Second on the survey 60% of the CMS reported they had enough knowledge, but qualitative data revealed about more nuances. Last, the reported comfort levels in the quantitative data were less overt in the qualitative date where additional feelings and attitudes were revealed, for example, frustration with families, preferences for more physician involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Care managers reported their attitudes about ACP, clarified through a rigorous mixed methods analysis. Care managers can successfully lead ACP discussions, but require further education, resources and team-based guidance.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Advance care planning is essential for reducing emotional, social and financial burdens associated with healthcare decision-making, and CMs can positively impact ACP discussions when appropriately supported by the clinical community. The many nuances in the ACP process that we found illustrate the need for ongoing discussions, education and research on this important topic.

Perceived language proficiency and pain assessment by registered and student nurses in native English-speaking and EAL children aged 4-7 years

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To identify the factors that influence decisions made by health professionals when assessing the pain of native English speaking and children whose English is an additional language.

BACKGROUND

Pain assessment in children is often poorly executed following acute injury. Whilst a range of pain assessment tools have been developed, little guidance is provided for assessing pain in children with English as an additional language.

DESIGN

Factorial survey design.

METHODS

Twenty minor injuries unit nurses and 20 children's nursing students participated in an electronic survey to make judgements on 12 scenarios describing a child attending a minor injuries unit following an incident, accompanied by a parent. Respondents had to decide the most important form of pain assessment, and whether they would ask a parent or an interpreter to assess the pain of the child. An open-ended question asked about the difficulties found in making a judgement.

RESULTS

Observation of the child's behaviour was the most common pain assessment reported. The visual analogue scale was significantly associated with children with proficient English. Respondents were significantly more likely to involve parents in the assessment if they could speak English well compared to parents with poor English skills. Moreover, nursing students were significantly more likely than registered nurses to call for support from an interpreter. Thematic analysis identified three themes related to difficulties with pain assessment: contrasting approaches, differing perceptions of pain and overcoming challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduced ability to communicate between child, parent and healthcare professional highlights the need to identify forms of assessment based on individual cases.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The number of children with English as an additional language has seen a marked rise over the last decade. In situations where communication ability is reduced, assessment of pain should be tailored to meet the needs of the child. This may require timely access to interpreter services.

Development of a Scale to Assess Physician Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy

Background:

Although patients prefer that physicians initiate advance care planning (ACP) conversations, few physicians regularly do so. Physicians may be reluctant to initiate ACP conversations because they lack self-efficacy in their skills. Yet, no validated scale on self-efficacy for ACP exists. Our objective was to develop a scale that measures physicians’ ACP self-efficacy (ACP-SE) and to investigate the validity of the tool.

Methods:

Electronic questionnaires were administered to a random sample of family medicine physicians (n = 188). Exploratory factor analysis was performed to determine whether the scale was multidimensional. An initial assessment of the scale’s validity was also conducted.

Results:

The exploratory factor analysis indicated that a single factor was appropriate using all 17 items. A single, unidimensional scale was created by averaging the 17 items, yielding good internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.95). The average scale score was 3.94 (standard deviation = 0.71) on a scale from 1 to 5. The scale was moderately correlated with a global single-item measure of self-efficacy for ACP ( r = .79, P < .001), and the scale differentiated between physician groups based on how much ACP they were doing, how recently they had an ACP conversation, formal training on ACP, and knowledge of ACP. In a multivariate analysis, the ACP-SE scale was a strong predictor of the percentage of patients with chronic life-limiting diseases with whom the physician discussed ACP.

Conclusion:

The final ACP-SE scale included 17 items and demonstrated high internal consistency.

Current advance care planning practice in the Australian community: an online survey of home care package case managers and service managers

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) is the process of planning for future healthcare that is facilitated by a trained healthcare professional, whereby a person's values, beliefs and treatment preferences are made known to guide clinical decision-making at a future time when they cannot communicate their decisions. Despite the potential benefits of ACP for community aged care clients the availability of ACP is unknown, but likely to be low. In Australia many of these clients receive services through Home Care Package (HCP) programs. This study aimed to explore current attitudes, knowledge and practice of advance care planning among HCP service managers and case managers.

METHODS

An invitation to take part in a cross-sectional online survey was distributed by email to all HCP services across Australia in November 2012. Descriptive analyses were used to examine overall patterns of responses to each survey item in the full sample.

RESULTS

120 (response rate 25%) service managers and 178 (response rate 18%) case managers completed the survey. Only 34% of services had written ACP policies and procedures in place and 48% of case managers had previously completed any ACP training. In addition, although most case managers (70%) had initiated an ACP discussion in the past 12 months and viewed ACP as part of their role, the majority of the conversations (80%) did not result in documentation of the client's wishes and most (85%) of the case managers who responded did not believe ACP was done well within their service.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey shows low organisational ACP systems and support for case managers and a lack of a normative approach to ACP across Australian HCP services. As HCPs become more prevalent it is essential that a model of ACP is developed and evaluated in this setting, so that clients have the opportunity to discuss and document their future healthcare wishes if they choose to.

The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and Advance Care Planning Practices

Organizational characteristics may impede the uniform adoption of advance care planning (ACP) best practices. We conducted telephone interviews with site directors of a Midwestern state’s Medicaid waiver program administered by the Area Agencies on Aging and surveyed the 433 care managers (registered nurses and social workers) employed within these 9 agencies. Care managers at 2 agencies reported more frequent ACP discussions and higher levels of confidence. Both sites had ACP training programs, follow-up protocols, and informational packets available for consumers that were not consistently available at the other agencies. The findings point to the need for consistent educational programs and policies on ACP and more in depth examination of the values, beliefs, and resources that account for organizational differences in ACP.