1
|
Singh N, Giannitrapani KF, Gamboa RC, O’Hanlon CE, Fereydooni S, Holdsworth LM, Lindvall C, Walling AM, Lorenz KA. What Patients Facing Cancer and Caregivers Want From Communication in Times of Crisis: A Qualitative Study in the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024; 41:558-567. [PMID: 37390466 PMCID: PMC10315453 DOI: 10.1177/10499091231187351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interpersonal communication is a cornerstone of patient-centered care. We aimed to identify what patients with cancer and caregivers may want from communication during a public health crisis. METHODS We interviewed 15 patients (8 Veteran, 7 non-Veteran) and caregivers from regionally, racially, and ethnically diverse backgrounds across the US about serious illness care and quality of care during the COVID-19 pandemic Using an iterative, inductive and deductive process, 2 coders analyzed content associated with the code "Communication," which appeared 71 times, and identified 5 themes. RESULTS Participants identified as White (10), Latino/a (3), Asian (1), and Black (1). (1) Help patients and caregivers prepare for care during crisis by communicating medical information directly and proactively. (2) Explain how a crisis might influence medical recommendations and impact on recovery from illness. (3) Use key messengers to improve communication between primary teams, patients, and caregivers. (4) Include caregivers and families in communication when they cannot be physically present. (5) Foster bidirectional communication with patients and families to engage them in shared decision-making during a vulnerable time. CONCLUSION Communication is critical during a public health crisis yet overwhelmed clinicians may not be able to communicate effectively. Communicating with caregivers and family, transparent and timely communication, ensuring diverse providers are on the same page, and effective listening are known gaps even before the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinicians may need quick interventions, like education about goals of care, to remind them about what seriously ill patients and their caregivers want from communication and offer patient-centered care during crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nainwant Singh
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Karleen F. Giannitrapani
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Raziel C. Gamboa
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anne M. Walling
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karl A. Lorenz
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Menlo Park, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stray K, Wibe T, Debesay J, Bye A. Older adults' perceptions and experiences of interprofessional communication as part of the delivery of integrated care in the primary healthcare sector: a meta-ethnography of qualitative studies. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:146. [PMID: 38347442 PMCID: PMC10863142 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04745-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication between patients and healthcare providers, and effective interprofessional communication, are essential to the provision of high-quality care. Implementing a patient-centred approach may lead to patients experiencing a sense of comfort, validation, and active participation in own healthcare. However, home-dwelling older adults' perspectives on interprofessional communication (IPC) are lacking. The aim is therefore to explore how home-dwelling older adults experience communication in connection with the delivery of integrated care. METHODS The meta-synthesis was conducted in line with Noblit and Hare's seven phases of meta-ethnography. A systematic literature search was conducted by two university librarians in seven databases using the search terms 'older adults', 'communication', 'integrated care' and 'primary care'. All articles were reviewed by two authors independently. 11 studies were included for analysis. RESULTS Older adults are aware of IPC and have preferences regarding how it is conducted. Three main themes were identified in the reciprocal analysis: (1) Inconsistent care perceived as lack of IPC, (2) individual preferences regarding involvement and awareness of IPC and (3) lack of IPC may trigger negative feelings. CONCLUSIONS This meta-ethnography shows the perspective of older adults on IPC as part of integrated care. Our study shows that older adults are concerned about whether healthcare personnel talk to each other or not and recognise IPC as fundamental in providing consistent care. The perspectives of older adults are relevant for clinicians and politicians, as well as researchers, when developing and implementing future integrated care services for home-dwelling older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoline Stray
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Torunn Wibe
- Centre for Development of Institutional and Home Care Services, City of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jonas Debesay
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Asta Bye
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Michielsen L, Bischoff EWMA, Schermer T, Laurant M. Primary healthcare competencies needed in the management of person-centred integrated care for chronic illness and multimorbidity: Results of a scoping review. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:98. [PMID: 37046190 PMCID: PMC10091550 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02050-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic disease management is important in primary care. Disease management programmes focus primarily on the respective diseases. The occurrence of multimorbidity and social problems is addressed to a limited extent. Person-centred integrated care (PC-IC) is an alternative approach, putting the patient at the centre of care. This asks for additional competencies for healthcare professionals involved in the execution of PC-IC. In this scoping review we researched which competencies are necessary for healthcare professionals working in collaborative teams where the focus lies within the concept of PC-IC. We also explored how these competencies can be acquired. METHODS Six literature databases and grey literature were searched for guidelines and peer-reviewed articles on chronic illness and multimorbidity in primary care. A data synthesis was carried out resulting in an overview of the competencies that healthcare professionals need to deliver PC-IC. RESULTS Four guidelines and 21 studies were included and four core competencies could be derived through the synthesis: 1. interprofessional communication, 2, interprofessional collaborative teamwork, 3. leadership and 4. patient-centred communication. Included papers mostly lack a clear description of the competencies in terms of knowledge, skills and attitudes which are necessary for a PC-IC approach and on how these competencies can be acquired. CONCLUSION This review provides insight on competencies necessary to provide PC-IC within primary care. Research is needed in more depth on core concepts of these competencies which will then benefit educational programmes to ensure that healthcare professionals in primary care are better equipped to deliver PC-IC for patients with chronic illness and multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Michielsen
- School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Erik W M A Bischoff
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tjard Schermer
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Science Support Office, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda Laurant
- School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
SHARING Choices: Design and rationale for a pragmatic trial of an advance care planning intervention for older adults with and without dementia in primary care. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 119:106818. [PMID: 35690262 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) and involving family are particularly important in dementia, and primary care is a key setting. The purpose of this trial is to examine the impact and implementation of SHARING Choices, an intervention to improve communication for older adults with and without dementia through proactively supporting ACP and family engagement in primary care. METHODS We cluster-randomized 55 diverse primary care practices across two health systems to the intervention or usual care. SHARING Choices is a multicomponent intervention that aims to improve communication through patient and family engagement in ACP, agenda setting, and shared access to the patient portal for all patients over 65 years of age. The primary outcomes include documentation of an advance directive or medical orders for life-sustaining treatment in the electronic health record (EHR) at 12 months for all patients and receipt of potentially burdensome care within 6 months of death for the subgroup of patients with serious illness. We plan a priori sub-analysis for patients with dementia. Data sources include the health system EHRs and the Maryland health information exchange. We use a mixed-methods approach to evaluate uptake, fidelity and adaptation of the intervention and implementation facilitators and barriers. CONCLUSIONS This cluster-randomized pragmatic trial examines ACP with a focus on the key population of those with dementia, implementation in diverse settings and innovative approaches to trial design and outcome abstraction. Mixed-methods approaches enable understanding of intervention delivery and facilitators and barriers to implementation in rapidly changing health care systems. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT04819191.
Collapse
|
5
|
Shared decision-making between older people with multimorbidity and GPs: focus group study. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:e609-e618. [PMID: 35379603 PMCID: PMC8999685 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shared decision making (SDM), utilising the expertise of both patient and clinician, is a key feature of good-quality patient care. Multimorbidity can complicate SDM, yet few studies have explored this dynamic for older patients with multimorbidity in general practice. Aim To explore factors influencing SDM from the perspectives of older patients with multimorbidity and GPs, to inform improvements in personalised care. Design and setting Qualitative study. General practices (rural and urban) in Devon, England. Method Four focus groups: two with patients (aged ≥65 years with multimorbidity) and two with GPs. Data were coded inductively by applying thematic analysis. Results Patient acknowledgement of clinician medicolegal vulnerability in the context of multimorbidity, and their recognition of this as a barrier to SDM, is a new finding. Medicolegal vulnerability was a unifying theme for other reported barriers to SDM. These included expectations for GPs to follow clinical guidelines, challenges encountered in applying guidelines and in communicating clinical uncertainty, and limited clinician self-efficacy for SDM. Increasing consultation duration and improving continuity were viewed as facilitators. Conclusion Clinician perceptions of medicolegal vulnerability are recognised by both patients and GPs as a barrier to SDM and should be addressed to optimise delivery of personalised care. Greater awareness of multimorbidity guidelines is needed. Educating clinicians in the communication of uncertainty should be a core component of SDM training. The incorrect perception that most clinicians already effectively facilitate SDM should be addressed to improve the uptake of personalised care interventions.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. This article aimed to assess changing use of brain imaging tests among patients with Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia who visited U.S. emergency departments (EDs) between 2006 and 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Using the largest publicly available all-payer ED database, the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, we identified a weighted cohort of 427,705 individuals with Alzheimer disease and 33,743 individuals with vascular dementia who visited U.S. EDs between 2006 and 2014. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with use. RESULTS. Between 2006 and 2014, ED visits among patients with Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia declined by 24.7% and 20.3%, respectively. However, there was a significant increase in utilization rates of head CT (from 4.4% to 11.1% in patients with Alzheimer disease and from 1.5% to 2.9% in patients with vascular dementia) and brain MRI (from 0.04% to 0.5% in patients with Alzheimer disease and 0.0% to 0.1% in those with vascular dementia) in the same time period. Among patients with Alzheimer disease, age, median income in patient ZIP code, day of the week of the ED visit, hospital teaching status, and hospital geographic region were significant predictors of imaging use. Among patients with vascular dementia, insurance type and hospital classification (urban vs rural) were significant predictors of imaging use. CONCLUSION. Despite declining ED visits, ED brain imaging in patients with Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia has increased. Various patient-specific and hospital-specific factors contribute to differential utilization rates.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abu Al Hamayel N, Isenberg SR, Sixon J, Smith KC, Pitts SI, Dy SM, Hannum SM. Preparing Older Patients With Serious Illness for Advance Care Planning Discussions in Primary Care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 58:244-251.e1. [PMID: 31071425 PMCID: PMC6679788 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Little is known about how to prepare older patients for advance care planning (ACP) discussions in primary care. OBJECTIVES The objective of the study was to explore older patients' perspectives and experiences on ACP discussions with family members and/or primary care clinicians. METHODS We conducted a qualitative interview study with 20 older patients who were involved in the clinic's ACP quality improvement initiative. We used an inductive approach to generate a coding scheme and used thematic analysis alongside a constant comparative methodology to iteratively refine emergent themes after coding the data. We used the transtheoretical behavior change model to conceptualize the process of ACP discussions, focusing on the contemplation, preparation, and action stages. RESULTS Four key themes emerged from our analyses: 1) the relevance/importance of ACP as a whole; 2) independently conceptualizing wishes and preferences for the future; 3) the process of engagement in ACP discussions; and 4) different outcomes of ACP discussions. While patients contemplated having an ACP discussion, they needed time to conceptualize their wishes on their own before documenting wishes or engaging with others. Moving to the preparation stage, patients shared their perspectives about how to engage family members and primary care clinicians in ACP discussions and reported different outcomes of these discussions, which varied according to patients' goals for ACP. CONCLUSION Understanding how to best prepare patients for ACP discussions from patients enrolled in an ACP primary clinic quality improvement initiative may assist primary care practices in developing interventions to improve the occurrence and effectiveness of such discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nebras Abu Al Hamayel
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Sarina R Isenberg
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joshua Sixon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Katherine Clegg Smith
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Samantha I Pitts
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sydney M Dy
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Susan M Hannum
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|