Impact of premorbid use of beta‑blockers on survival outcomes of patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

It is unclear if premorbid use of beta-blockers affects sepsis outcomes. The present systematic review aimed to assess the impact of premorbid beta-blocker use on mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation in patients with sepsis. Embase, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing outcomes of patients with sepsis based on the premorbid use of beta-blockers. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcome was the need for mechanical ventilation. The results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 17 studies including 64,586 patients with sepsis were included. Of them, 8,665 patients received premorbid beta-blockers and 55,921 patients were not treated with premorbid beta-blockers and served as a control group. Pooled analysis of mortality rates revealed that premorbid use of beta-blockers did not affect in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.18; and I2=63%) but significantly reduced one-month mortality rates (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.96; and I2=63%). Combined analysis of adjusted data showed that premorbid beta-blockers were associated with a significant survival advantage in patients with sepsis (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.92; and I2=70%). However, there was no effect of premorbid use of beta-blockers on the need for mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.30); and I2=72%). The results of the present study indicated that premorbid use of beta-blockers is associated with improved survival in patients with sepsis. However, it does not impact the need for mechanical ventilation. The results should be interpreted with caution as the data is observational and unadjusted.

Premorbid beta blockade in sepsis is associated with a lower risk of a lactate concentration above the lactate threshold, a retrospective cohort study

Sepsis and septic shock represent a significant worldwide mortality burden. A lactate greater than 4 mmol/L is associated with increased mortality in septic patients. This is the concentration at the "lactate threshold" where serum lactate concentrations rise markedly with increased workload in exercise. Hyperlactatemia in both sepsis and exercise is contributed to by adrenergic agonism which stimulates aerobic glycolysis, increasing lactate production and decreasing lactate clearance. Our hypothesis is that in patients with sepsis, treatment with beta blockers in the community will be associated with a lower probability of initial lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L. This was single centre retrospective cohort study. We used an in-house SQL Database for all admissions to ICU/HDU for the 2017-2020 calendar years. The dataset was filtered for an APACHE III Diagnosis of sepsis. T-tests were used for continuous data, Chi squared and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate to compare proportions. Logistic regression was used to investigate covariate effects. Of the 160 patient records analysed, 49 were prescribed beta blockers. A greater proportion of patients not prescribed beta blockers in the community had a first lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L (p = 0.049). This was robust to regression analysis. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with lactate ≥ 2 mmol/L (p = 0.52). In our cohort patients previously prescribed beta blockers were less likely to have a lactate of ≥ 4 mmol/mL. This supports the proposed mechanism that treatment with beta blockers increases the lactate threshold in sepsis. Further study is warranted.

Effect of Premorbid Beta-Blockers on Mortality in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of premorbid beta-blockers on mortality in patients with sepsis.

DATA SOURCES

We searched EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE for eligible studies. The protocol was registered at the PROSPERO (CRD42021256813).

STUDY SELECTION

Two authors independently evaluated the following inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies; (2) patients with sepsis aged ≥18 years, and (3) premorbid beta-blocker use.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors extracted the patients' characteristics and outcomes independently. All analyses were performed using the random-effects models. The primary outcome was short-term mortality, defined as mortality within 30 days, in-hospital or intensive care unit mortality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ten studies (n = 24 748 patients) were included. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of short-term mortality associated with the premorbid use of beta-blockers was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.04; P = .12; I² = 50%). Five studies reported an adjusted OR of short-term mortality. The pooled adjusted OR of short-term mortality associated with the premorbid use of beta-blockers was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65-0.83; P < .001; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Premorbid beta-blockers were associated with a lower short-term mortality in patients with sepsis.

Antihypertensive Medications Prior to Shock Onset Do Not Impact Initial Vasopressor Requirements in Patients With Shock

Purpose: The effect of the use of antihypertensive agents in patients prior to the development of shock is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of antihypertensive agents on vasopressor dose and duration in shock. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients with shock who received at least one vasopressor for at least 24 hours after shock onset from January 1 to June 30, 2017. Patients taking an antihypertensive agent(s) were compared to those who were not. The primary outcome was the number of vasopressor-free hours at 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included maximum and cumulative vasopressor doses, intensive care unit length of stay, and 30-day mortality. Results: One hundred and sixty-eight patients were included and 99 (59%) were on antihypertensives. Distributive shock was the most common type of shock (75.5%) and more patients taking antihypertensives had hypertension, coronary artery disease, and dyslipidemia at baseline. There was no difference in the number of vasopressor-free hours at 72 hours between patients taking an antihypertensive medication(s) and the control group (2 hours vs 1 hour; P = .11). No difference was found between any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Patients taking antihypertensive agents prior to shock onset did not require increased vasopressor doses or duration.

Hemodynamic Impact of Cardiovascular Antihypertensive Medications in Patients With Sepsis-Related Acute Circulatory Failure

BACKGROUND

Impact of prior cardiovascular antihypertensive medication during the initial phase of septic shock in terms of catecholamine requirements and mortality has been poorly investigated and remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between chronic prescription of cardiovascular antihypertensive medication prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission, catecholamine requirement, and mortality in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

We included all consecutive patients diagnosed with septic shock within the first 24 h of ICU admission, defined as a microbiologically proven or clinically suspected infection, associated with acute circulatory failure requiring vasopressors despite adequate fluid filling. Prior cardiovascular antihypertensive medication was defined as the chronic use of betablockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). ICU mortality was investigated using multivariate competitive risk analysis.

RESULTS

Among 735 patients admitted for septic shock between 2008 and 2016, 46.9% received prior cardiovascular antihypertensive medication. Prior cardiovascular antihypertensive therapy was not associated with increased norepinephrine requirements during the first 24 h (median = 0.28 μg/kg/min in patients previously treated vs. 0.26 μg/kg/min). Prior cardiovascular antihypertensive medication was not associated with a higher risk of ICU mortality after adjustment (cause-specific hazard = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [0.98-1.66], P = 0.06). Subgroups analyses for BB, CCB, and ACEi/ARB using propensity score analyses retrieved similar results.

CONCLUSION

In patients admitted with septic shock, prior cardiovascular antihypertensive medication seems to have limited impact on initial hemodynamic failure and catecholamine requirement.

Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker on the patients with sepsis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), reportedly have anti-inflammatory effects. This study assessed the association of prior use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs with sepsis-related clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A population-based observational study was conducted using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data. Among the adult patients hospitalized with new onset of sepsis in 2012, patients who took ARBs or ACE inhibitors at least 30 days prior to hospitalization were analyzed. Generalized linear models and logistic regression were used to examine the relation between the prior use of medication and clinical outcomes, such as in-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Of a total of 27,628 patients who were hospitalized for sepsis, the ACE inhibitor, ARB, and non-user groups included 1,214 (4.4%), 3,951 (14.4%), and 22,463 (82.1%) patients, respectively. As the patients in the ACE inhibitor and ARB groups had several comorbid conditions, higher rates of intensive care unit admission, hemodialysis, and mechanical ventilation were observed. However, after covariate adjustment, the use of ACE inhibitor (odds ratio [OR], 0.752; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.661 to 0.855) or ARB (OR, 0.575; 95% CI, 0.532 to 0.621) was significantly associated with a lower rate of in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

Pre-hospitalization use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs for sepsis was an independent factor for a lower rate of in-hospital mortality.

Sepsis With Preexisting Heart Failure: Management of Confounding Clinical Features

Preexisting heart failure (HF) in patients with sepsis is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Core sepsis management includes aggressive volume resuscitation followed by vasopressors (and potentially inotropes) if fluid is inadequate to restore perfusion; however, large fluid boluses and vasoactive agents are concerning amid the cardiac dysfunction of HF. This review summarizes evidence regarding the influence of HF on sepsis clinical outcomes, pathophysiologic concerns, resuscitation targets, hemodynamic interventions, and adjunct management (ie, antiarrhythmics, positive pressure ventilatory support, and renal replacement therapy) in patients with sepsis and preexisting HF. Patients with sepsis and preexisting HF receive less fluid during resuscitation; however, evidence suggests traditional fluid resuscitation targets do not increase the risk of adverse events in HF patients with sepsis and likely improve outcomes. Norepinephrine remains the most well-supported vasopressor for patients with sepsis with preexisting HF, while dopamine may induce more cardiac adverse events. Dobutamine should be used cautiously given its generally detrimental effects but may have an application when combined with norepinephrine in patients with low cardiac output. Management of chronic HF medications warrants careful consideration for continuation or discontinuation upon development of sepsis, and β-blockers may be appropriate to continue in the absence of acute hemodynamic decompensation. Optimal management of atrial fibrillation may include β-blockers after acute hemodynamic stabilization as they have also shown independent benefits in sepsis. Positive pressure ventilatory support and renal replacement must be carefully monitored for effects on cardiac function when HF is present.

Vasoactive Agent Use in Septic Shock: Beyond First-Line Recommendations

Septic shock is a life-threatening disorder associated with high mortality rates requiring rapid identification and intervention. Vasoactive agents are often required to maintain goal hemodynamics and preserve tissue perfusion. However, guidance regarding the proper administration of adjunct agents for the management of septic shock is limited in patients who are refractory to norepinephrine. This review summarizes vasopressor agents and describes the nuanced application of these agents in patients with septic shock, specifically focusing on clinical scenarios with limited guidance including patients who are nonresponsive to first-line agents and individuals with mixed shock states, tachyarrhythmias, obesity, valvular abnormalities, or other comorbid conditions.

Impact of chronic hypertension on time to goal mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with septic shock requiring vasopressors

PURPOSE

Mean arterial pressure (MAP) reflects the adequacy of tissue perfusion. In septic shock, vasopressors are recommended to target MAP ≥65 mmHg. The impact of chronic hypertension (HTN) on MAP achievement and outcomes are uncertain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, cohort study compared time to goal MAP in critically ill patients with septic shock admitted between May 2014 and July 2016. Between-group differences of patients with and without HTN were compared using appropriate statistical tests. To adjust for imbalances in baseline characteristics, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) procedure was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 133 included patients, 75 (56.4%) had a history of HTN. Baseline characteristics were mostly similar. Patients with HTN had higher in-hospital (49.3 vs. 31.0%, p = .035) and 28-day mortality (53.3 vs. 31.0%, p = .011). After weighting and adjustment for imbalanced variables, patients with HTN achieved goal MAP more rapidly than those without (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.14-2.96; p = .012). However, they also have higher odds of dying within 28 days of discharge (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.11-8.38; p = .031).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HTN achieved goal MAP more rapidly but had higher odds of mortality.