The Influence of the Food and Drug Administration Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule on Drug Information Resources

Considerations for Treating Nonobstetric Diseases in Pregnant Patients in the Emergency Department Setting

OBJECTIVE

To provide nonobstetric practitioners with an overview of key concepts for the pregnant patient and review treatment of 3 common acute nonobstetric diseases encountered in the emergency department setting.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of PubMed was performed (1997-February 2023) using key search terms related to pregnancy, pain, urinary tract infection (UTI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and anticoagulants.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant articles in English and humans were considered.

DATA SYNTHESIS

When caring for a pregnant patient, it is important to utilize appropriate assessments, understand terms used in this population, and recognize how the physiological and pharmacokinetic changes that occur in pregnancy can influence medication use. Pain, UTIs, and VTE are common in this population. Acetaminophen is the most widely used medication for the management of pain during pregnancy and the drug of choice for mild pain in pregnancy not responsive to nonpharmacologic treatment. Pyelonephritis is the most common nonobstetric cause of hospitalization for pregnant patients. Antimicrobial treatment should consider maternal-fetal safety and local resistance patterns. Pregnant and postpartum patients have a 4- to 5-fold increased risk of developing a VTE compared with nonpregnant patients. Low-molecular-weight heparin is the preferred treatment.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Pregnant patients often seek acute care in the emergency department setting for nonobstetric needs. Pharmacists in this setting should understand appropriate assessment questions and terms used within this population, the basics of physiological and pharmacokinetic changes in pregnancy that can impact treatment, and which resources are best to utilize for drug information of the pregnant patient.

CONCLUSION

Practitioners in the acute care setting commonly encounter pregnant patients seeking care for nonobstetric concerns. This article covers key pregnancy-related information for the nonobstetric practitioner and focuses on the management of acute pain, UTI, and VTE during pregnancy.

Treatments for Ocular Diseases in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Narrative Review

Pregnancy is a medical condition in which the physiological changes in the maternal body and the potential impact on the developing fetus require a cautious approach in terms of drug administration. Individual treatment, a thorough assessment of the extent of the disease, and a broad knowledge of the therapeutic options and different routes of administration of ophthalmic drugs are essential to ensure the best possible results while minimizing risks. Although there are currently several routes of administration of drugs for the treatment of eye diseases, even with topical administration, there is a certain amount of systemic absorption that must be taken into account. Despite continuous developments and advances in ophthalmic drugs, no updated data are available on their safety profile in these contexts. The purpose of this review is both to summarize the current information on the safety of ophthalmic treatments during pregnancy and lactation and to provide a practical guide to the ophthalmologist for the treatment of eye diseases while minimizing harm to the developing fetus and addressing maternal health needs.

Opportunities and challenges of pharmacovigilance in special populations: a narrative review of the literature

The relatively new discipline of pharmacovigilance (PV) aims to monitor the safety of drugs throughout their evolution and is essential to discovering new drug risks. Due to their specific and complex physiology, children, pregnant women, and elderly adults are more prone to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Additionally, the lack of clinical trial data exacerbates the challenges faced with pharmacotherapy in these populations. Elderly patients tend to have multiple comorbidities often requiring more extensive medication, which adds additional challenges for healthcare professionals (HCPs) in delivering safe and effective pharmacotherapy. Clinical trials often have inherent limitations, including insufficient sample size and limited duration of research; as some ADRs are attributed to long-term use of a drug, these may go undetected during the course of the trial. Therefore, the implementation of PV is key to insuring the safe and effective use of drugs in special populations. We conducted a thorough review of the scientific literature on PV systems across the European Union, the United States, and China. Our review focused on basic physiological characteristics, drug use, and PV for specific populations (children, pregnant women, and the elderly). This article aims to provide a reference for the development of follow-up policies and improvement of existing policies as well as provide insight into drug safety with respect to patients of special populations.

Inclusion of Pregnant and Lactating People in Clinical Research: Lessons Learned and Opportunities

Pregnant and lactating individuals historically have been excluded from research studies because of the ethical concerns surrounding potential harm to the fetus. Several National Institutes of Health and Food and Drug Administration initiatives have attempted to improve inclusion; however, clinical trials continue to exclude pregnant and lactating people. Drug labeling for safety and efficacy in pregnancy has thus been forced to rely on data from animal studies or limited case reports. Recent changes have sought to improve prescriber understanding of risks, benefits, and limitations of safety information on medications; however, confusion persists.

Review of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies performed for pharmaceuticals approved by FDA in 2020 and 2021

103 novel drugs were approved by the FDA in 2020-2021. Embryofetal development (EFD) studies were conducted for 76% of these approvals. For the majority of drugs, EFD studies were conducted in rats and rabbits. Both species were equally sensitive to developmental toxicity, but the rabbit was slightly more sensitive to maternal toxicity at the same systemic exposure level. Nonetheless, 68% of drugs showed more than a 2-fold difference in the low adverse effect level for developmental toxicity between the rat and rabbit. Previous reviews in this series compiled information on EFD studies for all small molecule pharmaceuticals approved since 2014 and for all therapeutic monoclonal antibodies approved to date. The use of non-human primates for the developmental toxicity testing of biopharmaceuticals has fallen over recent years (22% of biologics license applications (BLAs) for 2020-2021, compared with 62% for 2002-2015), with more biopharmaceuticals now tested in rodents (37% of BLAs for 2020-2021). While the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR), adopted in 2014, has brought consistency to the presentation of EFD data in drug labels, prescribers complain that the pregnancy section of current drug labels is neither concise nor clear. The FDA has pledged to address the concerns of clinicians in a future revision of the PLLR rule. The recommendations on risk assessment in the recently revised ICHS5(R3) guideline could be incorporated into the PLLR rule to remove extraneous nonclinical details from the label with the aim of facilitating rapid understanding by the practitioner.