Ankle dorsiflexion arthrodesis to salvage Chopart's amputation with anterior skin insufficiency

Do Transtibial Amputations Outperform Amputations of the Hind- and Midfoot Following Severe Limb Trauma?: A Secondary Analysis of the OUTLET Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare 18-month clinical and patient-reported outcomes between patients with severe lower-limb injuries treated with a transtibial amputation or a hind- or midfoot amputation. Despite the theoretical benefits of hind- and midfoot-level amputation, we hypothesized that patients with transtibial amputations would report better function and have fewer complications.

METHODS

The study included patients 18 to 60 years of age who were treated with a transtibial amputation (n = 77) or a distal amputation (n = 17) and who were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter Outcomes Following Severe Distal Tibial, Ankle, and/or Foot Trauma (OUTLET) study. The primary outcome was the difference in Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores, and secondary outcomes included pain, complications, amputation revision, and amputation healing.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between patients with distal versus transtibial amputation in any of the domains of the SMFA: dysfunction index [distal versus transtibial], 31.2 versus 22.3 (p = 0.13); daily activities, 37.3 versus 26.0 (p = 0.17); emotional status, 41.4 versus 29.3 (p = 0.07); mobility, 36.5 versus 27.8 (p = 0.20); and bother index, 34.4 versus 23.6 (p = 0.14). Rates of complications requiring revision were higher for distal amputations but not significantly so (23.5% versus 13.3%; p = 0.28). One distal and no transtibial amputees required revision to a higher level (p = 0.18). A higher proportion of patients with distal compared with transtibial amputation required local surgical revision (17.7% versus 13.3%; p = 0.69). There was no significant difference between the distal and transtibial groups in scores on the Brief Pain Index at 18 months post-injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical complication rates did not differ significantly between patients who underwent transtibial versus hind- or midfoot amputation for severe lower-extremity injury. The average SMFA scores were higher (worse), although not significantly different, for patients undergoing distal compared with transtibial amputation, and more patients with distal amputation had a complication requiring surgical revision. Of note, more patients with distal amputation required closure with an atypical flap, which likely contributed to less favorable outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Investigation of walking speed and plantar pressure after chopart amputation

BACKGROUND

In foot amputation, Chopart amputation is considered to have a high risk of deformity, and can result in poor function. We experienced a case in which Chopart amputation combined with tendon transfer and tendon lengthening was performed, and the patient was eventually able to walk independently with a foot prosthesis without experiencing deformity of the foot. We investigated walking speed and plantar pressure after Chopart amputation with and without a foot prosthesis.

CASE

A 78-year-old man underwent Chopart amputation with tendon transfer and tendon lengthening. As a result, he was able to stand up and walk, both while bearing weight on the heel of the affected foot, but he was unable to push off the ground using that foot. When a foot prosthesis was introduced, the patient's walking speed increased from 0.6 m/s without the prosthesis to 0.8 m/s with the prosthesis, which was an increase of 33%. The plantar pressure at the stump decreased from 129.3 N/cm2 on average without the prosthesis to 51.6 N/cm2 with the prosthesis, which was a 59% decrease. Wearing a foot prosthesis improved the patient's walking speed and decreased plantar pressure at the amputation stump.

Lisfranc and Chopart amputation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lisfranc and Chopart amputations are historically controversial procedures. To obtain evidence for the pros and cons we performed a systematic review to analyze wound healing, the need for re-amputation at a higher level, and ambulation after a Lisfranc or Chopart amputation.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in 4 databases (Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PsycInfo), using database-specific search strategies. Reference lists were studied to include relevant studies that were missed in the search. Of the 2881 publications found, 16 studies could be included in this review. Excluded publications concerned editorials, reviews, letters to the editor, no full text available, case reports, not meeting the topic, and written in a language other than English, German, or Dutch.

RESULTS

Failed wound healing occurred in 20% after Lisfranc amputation, in 28% after modified Chopart amputation, and 46% after conventional Chopart amputation. After Lisfranc amputation, 85% of patients were able to ambulate without prosthesis for short distances, and after modified Chopart 74%. After a conventional Chopart amputation, 26% (10/38) had unlimited household ambulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The need for re-amputation because wound healing problems occurred most frequently after conventional Chopart amputation. All 3 types of amputation levels do, however, provide a functional residual limb, with the remaining ability to ambulate without prosthesis for short distances. Lisfranc and modified Chopart amputations should be considered before proceeding to a more proximal level of amputation. Further studies are needed to identify patient characteristics to predict favorable outcomes of Lisfranc and Chopart amputations.

Mid- and Hindfoot Amputations in Diabetic Patients

Several surgical options exist to avoid or at least to delay a below-the-knee amputation (BKA). These are the so-called mid- or hindfoot amputations. They are a valuable treatment option in order to maintain the ability to ambulate without major auxiliary means (eg, a prosthesis). Hence, these amputations allow the patients to maintain certain autonomy. The acceptance of these amputations is significantly higher than a BKA, as the body image is less disturbed. The complication rate in hindfoot amputations in diabetic patients is high due to the comorbidities, in particular peripheral arterial disease and polyneuropathy.

Reconstruction of Chopart’s Amputation Stump with the Osteomusculocutaneous Latissimus Dorsi-Rib Flap

We present an original technique for reconstruction of the right forefoot after Chopart’s amputation. The case report was of a 20-year-old man who was a nonsmoker without comorbidities. He was referred to our department because of equinus deformity, pain, and prominence of the cuboid under the skin, leading to chronic ulceration at the stump. We performed flow through free latissimus dorsi flap including the eighth and tenth ribs to reconstruct the stump. Results were assessed at 18 months after operation, showing good stability and normal functional outcome of the foot. The patient is satisfied with the results achieved.

Surgical Management of Patients with Snakebite-Related Musculoskeletal Complication-A Single Institution Experience in Cambodia

BACKGROUND

Snakebite-related injury is a serious public health issue. In Cambodia, it is estimated that up to 21,500 cases of envenoming occurs from snakebites annually. Musculoskeletal disability is a major long-term complication associated with the injury. In this study, we aim to describe surgical management and rehabilitation in snakebite-related musculoskeletal injuries at Children's Surgical Centre, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case series analysis of patients with snakebite-related injury who were treated between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2018. Surgical patients were divided into the early and late presenting groups (= < one year vs. > one year, respectively) based on their time interval from snake bite to time of presentation.

RESULTS

There were 88 patients who presented with snakebite-related musculoskeletal injury during the cohort study period. Majority of them were male (n = 62, 71%) and had a median age of 24 years old (IQR 17-44). The injuries were all in the upper and lower limbs though lower limb injury was more common in female patients (81% vs. 48%, Fisher's test p = 0.005). The median time interval from snakebite to time of treatment was 3 years (IQR 3 months-11 years). In this study, 65 patients received surgical interventions. An ulcerated wound was the most common symptom among the early presenting group (78% vs. 24%), while scar contracture was most common among the late group (76% vs. 22%) (Fisher's test p < 0.0001). For management, surgical debridement was the most common primary intervention for the early group (52% vs. 19%), and contracture release was the most common for patients in the late group (62% vs. 15%) (Fisher's test p = 0.0004). Overall, the postoperative complication rate was highest in the late presenting group (34% vs. 3%, Fisher's test p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

More than half of the patients presented with musculoskeletal injury require surgical correction. Our study demonstrated that scar contracture is the most common complaint among the late presenting group and is associated with high postoperative complication rate.

Biomechanical analysis of stair ascent in persons with Chopart amputation

BACKGROUND

Compared to walking on level ground, ascending stairs requires a large range of motion not only of the hip and knee joint, but also of the ankle joint. The prosthesis often worn by persons with partial foot amputation largely prevents the ankle motion needed during stair ascent.

OBJECTIVES

Aim of this study was to assess subjects with a Chopart amputation utilizing a clamshell device during stair ascent to identify potential biomechanical deficits.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with reference group.

METHODS

Six subjects with unilateral Chopart amputation and 17 unimpaired subjects underwent three-dimensional motion analysis while ascending stairs in a step-over-step manner.

RESULTS

During weight acceptance, the involved side showed increased external hip-flexing and reduced knee-flexing moments and the sound side a higher ankle power than in the control group. The sound side showed higher external knee-flexing, dorsi-flexing, and hip-adducting moments than the controls during weight acceptance.

CONCLUSION

The mechanism observed on the involved side differs from that in controls, but is comparable to the mechanisms used by subjects with transtibial amputation reported in the literature. However, compensatory movements on the sound side take place at the ankle and knee joint, differing from subjects with more proximal amputations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study underpins the importance of adequate foot leverage and ankle function in cases of partial foot amputation, particularly in transfer situations such as stair ascent. If ankle range of motion is adequate, prosthetic/orthotic devices combining shank leverage with a hinged spring mechanism at the ankle may be promising.

The Lisfranc Amputation: A More Reliable Level of Amputation With Proper Intraoperative Tendon Balancing

Traditional transmetatarsal amputations are a reliable level of amputation. However, amputations at the Lisfranc level have met with limited success owing to improper biomechanics resulting from tendon imbalance, ultimately leading to foot deformity positions and an unstable soft tissue envelope with ensuing skin breakdown, infection, and below-the-knee amputation. We describe proper tendon rebalancing that results in improved biomechanics and a more reliable and stable amputation at the more proximal Lisfranc level.

Reconstruction of Chopart's Amputation Stump Using Artificial Dermis Combined with Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap

A 63-year-old man dropped a metal chunk onto his left foot during his work and suffered a crush injury of the left forefoot. He underwent Chopart’s amputation followed by stump coverage with sole skin at the orthopedic department on the same day. He was referred to our department for reconstruction because of poor vascularization and subsequent necrosis of tissue at the stump. After the necrotic tissue was debrided, exposure of the talus bone was noted. An artificial dermis was then applied to the stump wound, followed by local negative pressure wound therapy. After 3 weeks, the generation of a strong dermis-like tissue was observed at the site of artificial dermis grafting. We then performed flow-through free anterolateral thigh flap grafting to reconstruct the stump wound. This procedure involved suturing of the peroneal muscle group and tibialis anterior muscle, which were cut off during Chopart’s amputation, and suturing the soft tissue surrounding the calcaneus firmly to the fascia lata of the anterolateral thigh flap, followed by suturing of the flap to the skin defect of the left foot. There were neither postoperative complications, such as skin ulcer and equinus/varus deformity, nor need for secondary repair of the grafted flap, so the patient was able to smoothly enter a rehabilitation program including gait training. The current reconstruction technique for the tissue defect following Chopart’s amputation, consisting of artificial dermis grafting, negative pressure wound therapy, and flow-through free anterolateral thigh flap grafting, enabled safe and smooth gait rehabilitation with a forefoot prosthesis.