Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative Success in Foot and Ankle Patients

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores Are Correlated With Tibial Shaft Fracture Nonunion Following Intramedullary Nailing

OBJECTIVES

To assess trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) in surgically treated tibial shaft fracture patients progressing to union versus nonunion.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients with operatively treated tibial shaft fractures (AO/OTA 42-A, B, C) using an intramedullary nail.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

PROMIS PF and PI were compared between patients progressing to union and patients requiring nonunion repair.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients (196 union, 38 nonunion) were included consisting 144 men and 90 women. The mean age of included patients was 40.8 years. A significant difference in mean PROMIS PF between union and nonunion patients was observed at 1-3 months ( P = 0.005), 3-6 months ( P < 0.001), 6-9 months ( P = 0.003), and 6-12 months ( P = 0.018). The odds of developing nonunion for every unit decrease in PROMIS PF was significant at 3-6 months (OR 1.07, P = 0.028) and 6-9 months (OR 1.17, P = 0.015). A significant difference in mean PROMIS PI between union and nonunion patients was observed at 1-3 months ( P = 0.001), 3-6 months ( P = 0.005), and 6-9 months ( P = 0.005). The odds of developing nonunion for every unit increase in PROMIS PI was significant at 1-3 months (OR 1.11, P = 0.005), 3-6 months (OR 1.10, P = 0.011), and 6-9 months (OR 1.23, P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Poorly trending PROMIS PF and PI in the clinical setting is a factor that can be used to evaluate progression to nonunion following tibial shaft repair where imaging studies may lag behind.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Using PROMIS Scores to Provide Cost-Conscious Follow-up After Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

National campaigns in the United States, such as Choosing Wisely, emphasize that decreasing low-value office visits maximizes health care value. Although patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are frequently used to quantify postoperative outcomes, they have not been assessed as a tool to help guide clinicians consider alternatives or discontinue in-person follow-up visits. The purpose of this study is to assess the frequency and cost of in-person follow-up visits after patients report substantial improvement defined as 2 consecutive improvements above preoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores.

METHODS

Retrospective PROMIS PI data were obtained between 2015 and 2020 for common elective foot (n = 759) and ankle (n = 578) surgical procedures. Patients were divided into quartiles according to their preoperative PI score. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate time to substantial improvement. Substantial improvement was defined as having 2 consecutive postoperative minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) above preoperative PROMIS PI scores. MCID was measured using the distribution-based method. Multivariable negative binomial models were used to determine the number of visits and direct associated costs after substantial improvement. The cost to payors was estimated using reimbursement rates.

RESULTS

Within 3 months, 12% to 46% of foot and 16% to 61% of ankle patients achieved substantial improvement. Results vary by preoperative pain quartile, with patients who report higher preoperative pain scores achieving earlier improvement. After achieving substantial improvement, foot and ankle patients averaged 3.60 and 4.01 follow-up visits during the remaining 9 months of the year. Visit costs averaged $266 and $322 per foot and ankle patient respectively.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative follow-up visits are time-consuming and costly. Physicians might consider objective measures, such as PROMIS PI, to determine the need, timing, and alternatives for in-person follow-up visits for elective foot and ankle surgeries after patients demonstrate reliable clinical improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study at a single institution.

Patient Reported Outcomes Following Triple Arthrodesis for Adult Acquired Flat Foot Deformity: Minimum Two Year Follow Up

The aim of this study is to analyze patient-reported outcomes following this procedure as well as any demographics that may confer prognostic capability. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent Triple Arthrodesis at our facility from 2014-2021. Patients were selected if they underwent an isolated triple arthrodesis. All cases included either a gastrocnemius recession versus a percutaneous tendo-achilles lengthening depending on the patient's Silverskiold examination. The electronic medical record was utilized to collect basic patient demographics, previous foot and ankle surgeries, hardware failures, additional procedures, and surgical complications. To evaluate outcomes, we compared patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) survey scores with the general population and preoperative versus postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Foot function index (FFI) scores and scores were utilized as a validation tool for our results. A total of 132 patients met the criteria for our study with a total of 50 participants completing the PROMIS and FFI surveys. The average time point at which the outcomes were collected was 5.50 y postoperatively, ranging from 1.65 to 7.57 y. The average PROMIS physical function was 38.35, pain interference was 61.52, and depression was 49.82 for this population. The mean FFI scores were 58.56 for pain, 60.07 for disability, and 48.07 for activity limitation. There was a significant decrease in preoperative and postoperative VAS scores from 5.4 to 2.55 (p < .001). Three patients experienced wound complications related to decreased sensation. Our results indicated that only PROMIS depression scores were within one standard deviation of the population mean following a triple arthrodesis procedure. PROMIS physical function and pain interference were both outside of one standard deviation for the population.

Factors Influencing PROMIS Scores and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Surgical Intervention of Isolated Lisfranc Injury: Minimum 2 Year Follow-up

Lisfranc injuries are rare but significant foot injuries, as they often result from polytrauma patients, and are often misdiagnosed, which further complicate their evaluation and contribute to their propensity towards disability. It is recommended that, on diagnosis, Lisfranc injuries be treated as soon as possible to decrease the risk of future chronic pain, disability, or osteoarthritis. Our study evaluated patients who completed the patient reported outcome measurement information systems (PROMIS) along with the foot function index (FFI) following operative fixation for Lisfranc injury. Fifty-one patients between 2010 and 2020 met inclusion criteria and were selected for this study, with completion. Utilizing the electronic medical record (EMR), patient charts were reviewed to obtain basic patient demographic information and comorbidities. Operative reports were reviewed to determine which procedure was performed for definitive fixation. Primary arthrodesis was associated with a significant decrease in complication rates (p = .025) when compared to ORIF. Females, arthrodesis, and procedures using a home run (HR) screw were independent risk factors for significantly higher reports of PROMIS pain interference. Arthrodesis also was associated with lower PROMIS pain interference scores. Arthrodesis and males exhibited higher scores in all FFI categories. Our results provide evidence that patient reported outcomes following Lisfranc surgery reported via PROMIS, FFI and VAS scores are independently influenced by patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical variables. Analysis of potential associations between these patient characteristics and PROMIS and FFI scores provides evidence for physicians to manage patient expectations prior to operative treatment of a nonpolytraumatic Lisfranc injury.

Non-White Race and Concomitant Orthopedic Conditions Are Risk Factors for Failure to Achieve Clinically Relevant Improvement After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Data from the American Joint Replacement Registry demonstrate that 1-year minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are substantially lower when using general patient reported outcome measures, such as Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), than joint specific measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient characteristics and outcomes associated with MCID achievement after TKA using the PROMIS-PF measure.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 263 patients undergoing TKA with preoperative and 1-year postoperative PROMIS-PF scores from March 12, 2020 to February 8, 2022 was performed. Three multivariate models were built to evaluate predictors of MCID achievement. Preoperative predictors evaluated included demographics, comorbidities, history of spine and knee surgery, and baseline PROMIS-PF. Postoperative clinical outcomes evaluated included lengths of stay, discharge statuses, complications, and utilizations of other orthopaedic services.

RESULTS

There were 109 patients (41%) who achieved an MCID at 1-year postoperatively. Non-white patients had 2.17 times lower odds of achieving MCID. No clinical outcomes assessed were independently predictive of MCID achievement. During the 1-year postoperative period, 63% of patients sought care for another orthopaedic condition. Patients requiring postoperative injections on another joint had a 2.27 times lower odds of achieving MCID. Those seen for spine conditions postoperatively had a 2.44 lower odds of achieving MCID.

CONCLUSIONS

Race, postoperative injections, and treatment for spine conditions after TKA were independent predictors of failure to achieve MCID. These results may guide preoperative patient consultation and risk-adjustment in future studies using PROMIS-PF as an endpoint for evaluation of TKA outcomes.

Social vulnerability adversely affects emergency-department utilization but not patient-reported outcomes after total joint arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Multiple studies demonstrate social deprivation is associated with inferior outcomes after total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty; its effect on patient-reported outcomes is debated. The primary objective of this study evaluated the relationship between social vulnerability and the PROMIS-PF measure in patients undergoing THA and TKA. A secondary aim compared social vulnerability between patients who required increased resource utilization or experienced complications and those who didn't.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 537 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 was performed. The Centers for Disease Control Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) were used to quantify socioeconomic disadvantage. The cohort was split into THA and TKA populations; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. Statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

48.6% of patients achieved PROMIS-PF MCID at 1-year postoperatively. Higher levels of overall social vulnerability (0.40 vs. 0.28, p = 0.03) were observed in TKA patients returning to the ED within 90-days of discharge. Increased overall SVI (OR = 9.18, p = 0.027) and household characteristics SVI (OR = 9.57, p = 0.015) were independent risk factors for 90-day ED returns after TKA. In THA patients, increased vulnerability in the household type and transportation dimension was observed in patients requiring 90-day ED returns (0.51 vs. 0.37, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Despite an increased risk for 90-day ED returns, patients with increased social vulnerability still obtain good 1-year functional outcomes. Initiatives seeking to mitigate the effect of social deprivation on TJA outcomes should aim to provide safe alternatives to ED care during early recovery.

Analysis of Nonweightbearing MRI Fat Pad Thickness Under Central Metatarsals in Patients With and Without Metatarsalgia

BACKGROUND

Metatarsalgia is a common diagnosis for patients with forefoot pain. Many have proposed metatarsal fat pad atrophy is a cause of metatarsalgia and therefore have suggested fat grafting instead of distal metatarsal osteotomies to treat metatarsalgia. For fat grafting to be a viable treatment, fat pad atrophy should correlate with metatarsalgia. This study looked to determine the relationship between metatarsal fat pad thickness and metatarsalgia and the correlation between metatarsal fat pad thickness and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with metatarsalgia and those with foot or ankle osteoarthritis who had a nonweightbearing MRI performed between February 1, 2021, and March 1, 2023. Data collected included demographics, PROMIS scores, metatarsal fat pad thickness in the second and third rays of the affected foot, and thinnest area on coronal section, measured on MRI. Student t test was used to compare continuous variables, whereas the χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables. Multivariable linear regression models were used to control for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were included in this study. Patients with metatarsalgia were significantly more likely to have a lower body mass index (29.3 vs 32.0, P = .03) than patients with osteoarthritis, but this finding was not present when controlling for confounding variables. We found no significant difference in fat pad thickness between patients with metatarsalgia vs patients with foot or ankle osteoarthritis (P = .43). We found no correlation between metatarsal fat pad thickness and pain interference (P = .59), physical function (P = .64), or mobility (P = .94) PROMIS scores.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective comparative study of a relatively small cohort we found no significant difference in metatarsal fat pad thickness for patients with metatarsalgia vs patients with foot and ankle osteoarthritis based on nonweightbearing MRI, and no association between metatarsal fat pad thickness and patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case control study.

Differences in Baseline Physical Function and Mental Health PROM Scores in Patients With Foot and Ankle Conditions

BACKGROUND

This study sought to establish normative values for baseline physical and mental health by foot and ankle diagnosis using validated PROMIS scores and to compare the correlation between these 2 outcomes across common diagnoses. Additionally, it investigated the effects associated with chronic vs acute conditions and specific diagnoses on mental health.

METHODS

We reviewed baseline PROMIS Physical Function 10a (PF10a) and PROMIS Global-Mental (PGM) scores of 14,245 patients with one of the 10 most common foot and ankle diagnoses seen at our institution between 2016 and 2021. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between PF10a and PGM by diagnosis. A multivariable regression model including age, sex, language, race, ethnicity, education level, income, and Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to determine the associated effect of diagnosis on PGM score.

RESULTS

On unadjusted analysis, patients diagnosed with an ankle fracture had the lowest mean physical function, whereas patients with hallux valgus had the highest (PF10a = 33.9 vs 46.7, P < .001). Patients with foot/ankle osteoarthritis had the lowest mean self-reported mental health, whereas patients with hallux rigidus had the highest (PGM = 49.9 vs 53.4, P < .001). PF10a and PGM scores were significantly positively correlated for all diagnoses; the correlation was strongest in patients diagnosed with foot/ankle osteoarthritis or hammertoes (r = 0.511) and weakest in patients with ankle fractures (r = 0.232) or sprains (r = 0.280). Chronic conditions, including hammertoes (β = -5.1, 95% CI [-5.8, -4.3], P < .001), foot/ankle osteoarthritis (β = -5.0, 95% CI [-5.7, -4.3], P < .001), and hallux valgus (β = -4.8, 95% CI [-5.5, -4.1], P < .001) were associated with the largest negative effects on patients' mental health.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported physical function and mental health varied across common foot and ankle diagnoses and were more tightly correlated in chronic conditions. The associations between diagnosis and mental health scores appear larger for more chronic diagnoses, including those that are generally associated with relatively unimpaired physical function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Responsiveness of the Brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference in the Context of Patient Mental Health

PURPOSE

A patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM) is responsive if it is sensitive to clinical status changes. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is used to indicate meaningful change, helpful in designing studies and adding context to some study results, and is related to instrument responsiveness. Our purpose was to provide MCID estimates for the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (bMHQ) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) in a hand and upper extremity surgery cohort within the context of varying patient-reported mental health.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 1,262 adult patients who received surgical care at a single center between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Patients completed PROMIS PI, PROMIS Global Health (including global mental health [GMH] component), bMHQ, and a pain-focused anchor question before each clinic visit. Data were collected 8 ± 2 weeks before and after surgery. A distribution-based MCID then was calculated for the general patient population, lowest 10th percentile of GMH scores, and top 10th percentile of GMH scores.

RESULTS

Minimal clinically important difference estimates were 10.4 for the bMHQ and 4.3 for PROMIS PI. Analysis of MCID across different GMH score groups showed a mean score of 11.5 for bMHQ for the lowest 10th percentile of GMH, 9.6 for bMHQ for the top 10th percentile, 4.5 for PI for the lowest 10th percentile, and 4.9 for PI for the top 10th percentile.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of subgroups stratified by preoperative patient-reported mental health condition found that preoperative mental health status, as indicated by GMH score, does not have a meaningful impact on responsiveness of bMHQ or PROMIS PI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A patient's reported mental health condition does not meaningfully change how these common PRO instruments reflect the patient condition after hand and upper extremity surgery.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Collection and Utilization: A Survey of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Members

Given the benefits of patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) implementation and future reporting policies, the PROMs Workgroup conducted a study to evaluate the sentiment and practice patterns related to PROM collection and utilization. A survey including questions regarding sentiment and practice patterns related to PROM importance, collection, and utilization was administered to all members. Data were reported descriptively, and open-ended responses were analyzed using content and frequency analysis. Six hundred twelve surgeons (4%) participated. Most of them (52%) feel that PROMs are important. Forty-six percent collect and 35% use PROMs in practice. The greatest barriers to adoption include concerns about staff burden (72%), challenges in patients completing PROMs (69%), and cost (47%). While most of the surgeons feel that PROMs are important, many do not collect nor use PROMs in practice. The identified barriers may be informative in the development of resources to help comply with mandates and use PROMs to improve patient care.

Evaluating medical students' knowledge of patient-reported outcomes and the impact of curriculum intervention in consecutive cohorts

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collection and utilization improves patient-provider communication, symptom reporting, and patient satisfaction. Despite their significance, the science and utility of PROs are not part of required curriculum in medical education. The authors describe the results of a survey distributed to medical students evaluating their experience, knowledge, and perceptions of PROs, report on outcomes of the impact of formal PRO education on medical student knowledge, and describe strategies to foster the spread of PRO education into other programs.

METHODS

The authors developed and distributed a 20-question web-based survey distributed to medical students at two U.S. medical schools to evaluate students' experience, knowledge, and perceptions of PROs. To compare medical students' knowledge in their pre-clinical years (M1-M2) to those in their clinical years (M3-M4), the authors calculated odds ratios and determined significance determined using chi-squared tests. To determine the utility of formal education on medical students' knowledge of PROs, the authors invited 4th year medical students at a single institution to participate in a survey before and two weeks after receiving formal PRO education as part of the medical school curriculum, spanning three years.

RESULTS

137 (15%) medical students responded to the initial survey. Respondents' knowledge of PROs was low and did not differ when comparing pre-clinical to clinical years in school. Less than 10% had received education on PROs and only 16% felt prepared to use PROs in patient care. Respondents demonstrated positive attitudes towards PROs, with 84% expressing interest in learning about PROs. In the second phase education cohort of 231 (77% response rate) 4th -year medical students over three years, formal education improved correct response rates to PRO questions. After education, 90% (121/134) agreed PROs are an important component of high-quality care.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies a gap in knowledge about PROs among medical students irrespective of year in training. It also shows that structured education may help fill the PRO knowledge gap, potentially providing future clinicians with the skills to implement PROs into clinical practice, aligning with the broader shift towards patient-centric evidence-based healthcare practices.

An Evaluation of Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Minimal Clinically Important Difference Usage in Hand Surgery

Background

This study was designed to examine the current use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) calculations in the hand surgery literature in an effort to standardize their use for research purposes.

Methods

A systematic review of the hand surgery literature was conducted. All nonshoulder upper extremity articles utilizing PROMs were compared between different journals, different surgical indications, and differing usage. MCID values were reported, and calculation methods assessed.

Results

In total, 4677 articles were reviewed, and 410 met the inclusion criteria of containing at least one PROM. Of the 410 articles reporting PROMs, 148 also mentioned an associated MCID. Of the articles that mentioned MCIDs, 14 calculated MCID values based on their specific clinical populations, whereas the remainder referenced prior studies. An estimated 35 different PROMs were reported in the study period; 95 different MCID values were referenced from 65 unique articles.

Conclusions

There are many different PROMs currently being used in hand surgery clinical reports. The reported MCIDs from their related PROMs are from multiple different sources and calculated by different methods. The lack of standardization in the hand surgery literature makes interpretation of studies utilizing PROMs difficult. There is a need for a standardized method of calculating MCID values and applying these values to established PROMs for nonshoulder upper extremity conditions.

Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in knee arthroplasty patients: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of the literature pertaining to Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) validation and utilization as an outcomes metric in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. This is the first systematic review on PROMIS use in total knee arthroplasty patients.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Pubmed/MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Study characteristics, patient demographics, psychometric properties (Pearson and Spearman correlation) with legacy patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) instruments, floor and ceiling effects, responsiveness, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and PROMIS outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies investigating PROMIS in 11,140 patients were included. The weighted-average Pearson correlation coefficient comparing PROMIS domains with legacy patient-reported outcome measurements in total knee arthroplasty patients was 0.62 [standard error (SE) = 0.06] and the weighted-average Spearman correlation comparing PROMIS domains with legacy patient-reported outcome measurements in total knee arthroplasty patients was 0.59 (SE = 0.06), demonstrating moderate-to-strong correlation and validity. There were no differences in weighted average floor [0.03% (SE = 3.1) versus 0% (SE = 0.1) versus 0.01% (SE = 1.1); p = 0.25] or ceiling effects [0.01% (SE = 0.7) versus 0.02% (SE = 1.4) versus 0.04% (SE = 3.5); p = 0.36] between PROMIS and legacy instruments. The weighted average for percentage of patients achieving MCID was 59.1% for global physical health (GPH), 26.0% for global mental health (GMH), 52.7% for physical function (PF), 67.2% for pain interference (PI), and 37.2% for depression.

CONCLUSION

Notably, PROMIS global physical health, physical function, and pain interference were found to be significantly responsive, with PROMIS pain interference most effectively capturing clinical improvement as evidenced by the achievement of MCID.

Pearls and pitfalls of PROMIS clinically significant outcomes in orthopaedic surgery

INTRODUCTION

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed as a uniform and generalizable PROM system using item response theory and computer adaptive testing. We aimed to assess the utilization of PROMIS for clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) measurements and provide insights into its use in orthopaedic research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed PROMIS CSO reports for orthopaedic procedures via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to 2022, excluding abstracts and missing measurements. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and questionnaire compliance. PROMIS domains, CSO measures, and study populations were described. A meta-analysis compared distribution and anchor-based MCIDs in low-bias (NOS ≥ 7) studies.

RESULTS

Overall, 54 publications from 2016 to 2022 were reviewed. PROMIS CSO studies were observational with increasing publication rates. Evidence-level was II in 10/54, bias low in 51/54, and compliance ≥ 86% in 46/54. Most (28/54) analysed lower extremity procedures. PROMIS domains examined Pain Function (PF) in 44/54, Pain Interference (PI) in 36/54, and Depression (D) in 18/54. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was reported in 51/54 and calculated based on distribution in 39/51 and anchor in 29/51. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and minimal detectable change (MDC) were reported in ≤ 10/54. MCIDs were not significantly greater than MDCs. Anchor-based MCIDs were greater than distribution based MCIDs (standardized mean difference = 0.44, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS CSOs are increasingly utilized, especially for lower extremity procedures assessing the PF, PI, and D domains using distribution-based MCID. Using more conservative anchor-based MCIDs and reporting MDCs may strengthen results. Researchers should consider unique pearls and pitfalls when assessing PROMIS CSOs.

The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice and Clinical Decision Making

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are highly effective measures of quality of care and outcomes that matter to patients regarding their physical, mental, and social health. While PROMs have played a notable role in research and registry reporting, they are also useful as clinical tools. Real-time PROM collection can be integrated into routine clinical care with immediate access to scores within the electronic health record. This can be integral when discussing treatment options and using decision aids. PROM scores can also be useful for postoperative monitoring. Various approaches to quantifying clinical efficacy have been developed, including the minimal clinically important difference, the substantial clinical benefit, and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). As the patient experience and patient-reported outcome measurement of health-related outcomes become increasingly emphasized in patient-centered, high value care, so too will the importance of methods to gauge clinical benefit using these instruments for improved clinical decision-making.

Operationalizing PROMs at the Musculoskeletal Practice and Policy Levels

There continues to be growing interest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), especially as value-based healthcare initiatives gain more traction. Although it is well-established that PROMs can be useful in clinical research, how to operationalize PROMs in clinical care and policy initiatives remains a "work in progress." Following the design of a comprehensive PROM administration and routine collection system, orthopaedic surgeons and their patients can reap the benefits of PROMs in practice through improved shared clinical decision-making discussions at the individual patient level and closer symptom monitoring on a large scale, with improved resource allocation at the population health level. Although certain government and payer incentives exist to collect PROMs at present, it is reasonable to assume that future policy initiatives will begin to use the actual PROM scores to assess clinical outcomes. Orthopaedic surgeons with interest in this area should prioritize their involvement in policy discussion to ensure PROMs are being used appropriately in novel payment models and policy endeavors so that they are both evaluated and compensated fairly. Specifically, orthopaedic surgeons can help ensure appropriate risk adjustment of patients when this is being done. Undoubtedly, PROMs will only become a larger part of musculoskeletal care moving forward.

Utilization of PROMIS Neuropathic Pain Quality for Detection and Monitoring Neuropathic Pain in Heel Pain Patients

Background

Diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain (NP) in foot and ankle patients remain challenging. We investigated the plausibility of using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Neuropathic Pain Quality (PQ-Neuro) as an initial screening tool to detect NP and track the treatment effects.

Methods

Patients with heel pain were prospectively recruited and grouped to no-NP, mild-NP, and severe-NP based on the initial PROMIS PQ-Neuro t scores. Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Self-Efficacy (SE) scores were evaluated at baseline, 30-day, and 90-day follow-up. Other factors such as age, smoking, body mass index (BMI), low back/neck pain, anxiety/depression, and medications were analyzed. Linear mixed modeling was used to assess the main effects of time and NP on PROMIS t scores, comparing minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

Results

Forty-eight patients with mean age of 52.4 years were recruited. Using the PROMIS PQ-Neuro as the assessment tool, 33 patients (69%) were detected to have NP at baseline-23 (48%) mild and 10 (21%) severe. BMI was the only independent factor associated with NP (P = .011). Higher baseline PQ-Neuro t score was significantly associated with higher follow-up PQ-Neuro (P < .001), PI (P = .005), and lower SE (P = .04) across time points. Patients with NP showed lower PF at baseline with significantly less improvement in PF (3 vs 9.9, P = .035) and did not meet MCID.

Conclusion

Baseline PROMIS PQ-Neuro ≥46 was significantly associated with worse PI and SE across all time points, with less clinically significant improvements in PF. Prevalence of NP in heel pain patients was high. The PROMIS PQ-Neuro may serve as a valuable tool for detection of NP and guiding clinical treatment decision pathways for heel pain patients.

Level of Evidence

Level III, prospective cohort study.

"In Situ" Joint Preparation Technique for First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparative Review of 388 Cases

"Cup-shaped power reamers" and "flat cuts" (FC) are common joint preparation techniques in first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis. However, the third option of an "in situ" (IS) technique has rarely been studied. This study aims to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of the IS technique for various MTP pathologies with other MTP joint preparation techniques. A single-center retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent primary MTP joint arthrodesis between 2015 and 2019. In total, 388 cases were included in the study. We found higher nonunion rates in the IS group (11.1% vs 4.6%, p = .016). However, the revision rates were similar between the groups (7.1% vs 6.5%, p = .809). Multivariate analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus was associated with significantly higher overall complication rates (p < .001). The FC technique was associated with transfer metatarsalgia (p = .015) and a more first ray shortening (p < .001). Visual analog scale, PROMIS-10 physical, and PROMIS-CAT physical scores significantly improved in IS and FC groups (p < .001, p = .002, p = .001, respectively). The improvement was comparable between the joint preparation techniques (p = .806). In conclusion, the IS joint preparation technique is simple and effective for first MTP joint arthrodesis. In our series, the IS technique had a higher radiographic nonunion rate that did not correlate with a higher revision rate, and otherwise similar complication profile to the FC technique while providing similar PROMs. The IS technique resulted in significantly less first ray shortening when compared to the FC technique.

Predictive Outcomes of Deep Learning Measurement of the Anterior Glottic Angle in Bilateral Vocal Fold Immobility

OBJECTIVE

(1) To compare maximum glottic opening angle (anterior glottic angle, AGA) in patients with bilateral vocal fold immobility (BVFI), unilateral vocal fold immobility (UVFI) and normal larynges (NL), and (2) to correlate maximum AGA with patient-reported outcome measures.

METHODS

Patients wisth BVFI, UVFI, and NL were retrospectively studied. An open-source deep learning-based computer vision tool for vocal fold tracking was used to analyze videolaryngoscopy. Minimum and maximum AGA were calculated and correlated with three patient-reported outcomes measures.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fourteen patients were included. Mean maximum AGA was 29.91° (14.40° SD), 42.59° (12.37° SD), and 57.08° (11.14° SD) in BVFI (N = 70), UVFI (N = 70), and NL (N = 72) groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients requiring operative airway intervention for BVFI had an average maximum AGA of 24.94° (10.66° SD), statistically different from those not requiring intervention (p = 0.0001). There was moderate negative correlation between Dyspnea Index scores and AGA (Spearman r = -0.345, p = 0.0003). Maximum AGA demonstrated high discriminatory ability for BVFI diagnosis (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.81-0.97, p < 0.001) and moderate ability to predict need for operative airway intervention (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.89, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A computer vision tool for quantitative assessment of the AGA from videolaryngoscopy demonstrated ability to discriminate between patients with BVFI, UVFI, and normal controls and predict need for operative airway intervention. This tool may be useful for assessment of other neurological laryngeal conditions and may help guide decision-making in laryngeal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Laryngoscope, 133:2285-2291, 2023.

Impact of Sports Participation on Achievement of Clinically Relevant Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction

Background

Clinically relevant threshold values associated with patient-reported outcome measures after orthopaedic procedures such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are important for relating these scores to meaningful postoperative improvement.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to determine the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS-CAT) after ACLR. It was hypothesized that preoperative sport participation would have an impact on PASS achievement.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Included were consecutive patients who underwent primary assisted ACLR between January 4 and August 1, 2016. Patients were administered the PROMIS-CAT Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference domains preoperatively and at a minimum 2 years postoperatively, with external anchor questions used to determine the PASS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for the entire study population as well as separately for athletes and nonathletes to determine PROMIS PASS thresholds for each population. A previously published PROMIS-PF minimal clinically important difference was used to evaluate postoperative improvement. A post hoc multivariate nominal logistic multivariate analysis was constructed to assess the effects of preoperative patient characteristics on the likelihood of attaining both the minimal clinically important difference and PASS.

Results

In total, 112 patients were included in the study, with 79 (71%) having recreational or higher levels of athletic participation. The PASS for the study population was 56.0 (area under the ROC curve, 0.86) and was unaffected by baseline PROMIS-PF scores but was affected by preoperative athletic participation (56.0 for athletes, 49.0 for nonathletes). A post hoc analysis found 57 patients (51%) achieved the PASS for the PROMIS-PF (cutoff, 56.0), but when the athlete and nonathlete thresholds were applied to their respective patient groups, 66% of athletes and 64% of nonathletes achieved the PASS postoperatively. The multivariate analysis found that sport participation (odds ratio, 6.2; P = .001) but not age, sex, body mass index, or preoperative PROMIS affected the likelihood of achieving the PASS on the PROMIS-PF.

Conclusion

Preoperative athletic participation significantly affected the ability to achieve PASS.

Does Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Use at New Foot and Ankle Patient Clinic Visits Improve Patient Activation, Experience, and Satisfaction?

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can help predict clinical outcomes and improve shared clinical decision-making discussions. There remains a paucity of research assessing how the use of PROMs may drive improved patient experience and patient activation.

METHODS

New foot and ankle patients completed PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression assessments. Patients were then randomized to viewing and discussing their PROMIS scores with their surgeon or not. Following the clinic visit, patients completed a series of Clinician & Group Survey-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) questions and the Patient Activation Measure (PAM). Responses to the CG-CAHPS questions and PAM were compared between the 2 groups and after clustering on surgeon. Potential interaction effects by social deprivation were also explored.

RESULTS

After enrolling patients but removing those lost to follow-up or with missing data, 97 and 116 patients remained in the intervention control cohorts, respectively. No difference was found in CG-CAHPS responses nor PAM scores between the 2 groups (P > .05). All surgeons were highly rated by all patients. When clustered by surgeon, intervention subjects were less likely to indicate "top box" scores for the understanding domain of the CG-CAHPS question (OR 0.51, P < .001) and had decreased odds of high patient activation compared to control subjects (OR 0.67; P = .005). Among the most socially disadvantaged patients, there was no difference in control and intervention subjects in their likelihood of having high patient activation (P = .09).

CONCLUSION

Highly rated foot and ankle surgeons who show and discuss PROM results may not improve patient experience or activation and may, in fact, decrease understanding or patient activation in select populations. Future work is needed to determine when PROM discussions are most beneficial and how best to present PROMs data, as we suspect that how the information was presented-and not the use of PROMs-resulted in our findings. Health literacy tools and/or communication training may better engage different patient groups regarding PROMs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Contemporary Review: An Overview of the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has favorable psychometric and administrative properties in orthopaedic clinical research. It facilitates clinically meaningful data collection while minimizing administration time and survey fatigue and improving compliance. PROMIS is a critical component of patient-centered care and shared decision making, as it provides enhanced communication and engagement between patients and providers. As a validated instrument, it may also aid in measuring value-based health care quality. The goal of the current work is to provide an overview of PROMIS metrics used in orthopaedic foot and ankle, including advantages and disadvantages compared to legacy scales and PROMIS's applicability in specific foot and ankle conditions based on psychometric properties. We provide a review of the literature regarding the utilization of PROMIS as an outcome measure for specific foot and ankle procedures and conditions.

PROMIS Scores for Plantar Fasciitis Before and After Gastrocnemius Recession

BACKGROUND

There has been an established relationship between increased loading on the Achilles tendon and tension on the plantar fascia. This supports the idea that either tight gastrocnemius and soleus muscles or contractures of the Achilles tendon are risk factors for plantar fasciitis. Gastrocnemius recession has gained popularity as a viable surgical intervention for cases of chronic plantar fasciitis due to isolated gastrocnemius contracture. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) scores in patients with plantar fasciitis before and after gastrocnemius recession.

METHODS

The Electronic Medical Record was queried for medical record numbers associated with Current Procedural Terminology code 27687 (gastrocnemius recession). Our study included all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of chronic plantar fasciitis with treatment via isolated gastrocnemius recession with 1-year minimum follow-up. Forty-one patients were included in our study. Patient variables were collected via chart review. Preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores were collected in the clinic.

RESULTS

We followed up 41 patients with a median age of 48 years (interquartile range [IQR] 38-55) and median body mass index of 29.02 (IQR 29.02-38.74) for 1 year post surgery. Preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores improved for physical function from 39.3 to 44.5 (P = .0005) and for pain interference from 62.8 to 56.5 (P = .0001). PROMIS depression scores were not significantly different (P = .6727). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores significantly decreased from 7.05 to 1.71 (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In this case series, we found the gastrocnemius recession to be an effective option for patients with refractory pain in plantar fasciitis. Our PROMIS and VAS data confirm this procedure's utility and highlight its ability to significantly decrease pain and improve physical function in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis, although final median scores did not reach normative standards for the population, suggesting some residual pain and/or dysfunction was, on average, present. Based on the results of this study, the authors conclude that gastrocnemius recession is a reasonable treatment option for chronic plantar fasciitis patients who fail nonoperative management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Factors Associated With Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes in Isolated Gastrocnemius Recession for Heel Pain

Background

Gastrocnemius recession is commonly performed for a variety of pathologies of the foot and ankle, yet studies characterizing risk factors associated with patient-reported outcomes are limited. In this cohort study, patient outcomes were compared against the general population for PROMIS scores with correlation analysis comparing demographics and comorbidities. Our primary goal in this study is to identify risk factors associated with poor patient-reported outcomes following isolated gastrocnemius recession for patients with plantar fasciitis or insertional Achilles tendinopathy.

Methods

A total of 189 patients met inclusion criteria. The open Strayer method was preferred. However, if the myotendinous junction could not be adequately visualized without expanding the excision, then a Baumann procedure was performed. The decision between the two did not depend on preoperative contracture. Patient demographics and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were obtained via the electronic medical record. Telephone interviews were completed to collect postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) scores. The data were analyzed using the type 3 SS analysis of variance test to identify individual patient factors associated with reduced PROMIS, FFI, and VAS scores.

Results

No demographic variables were found to be significantly associated with postoperative complications. Patients who reported tobacco use at the time of surgery had significantly decreased postoperative PROMIS physical function (P = .01), PROMIS pain interference (P < .05), total FFI scores (P < .0001), and each individual FFI component score. Patients undergoing their first foot and ankle surgeries reported numerous significant postoperative outcomes, including decreased PROMIS pain interference (P = .03), higher PROMIS depression (P = .04), and lower FFI pain scores (P = .04). Hypertension was significantly associated with an increased FFI disability score (P = .03) and, along with body mass index (BMI) >30 (P < .05) and peripheral neuropathy (P = .03), significantly higher FFI activity limitation scores (P = .01). Pre- and postoperative VAS scores demonstrated improvement in patient-reported pain from a mean of 5.53 to 2.11, respectively (P < .001).

Conclusion

We found in this cohort that numerous patient factors were independently associated with differences in patient-reported outcomes following a Strayer gastrocnemius recession performed for plantar fasciitis or insertional Achilles tendinopathy. These factors include, but are not limited to, tobacco use, prior foot and ankle surgeries, and BMI. This study strengthens previous reports demonstrating the efficacy of isolated gastrocnemius recession and elucidates variables that may affect patient-reported outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

High complication rates following revision first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: a retrospective analysis of 79 cases

BACKGROUND

The most common indications for revision of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis are symptomatic failures of prior arthrodesis, failed hallux valgus correction, and failed MTPJ arthroplasty implants. However, the outcomes of revision MTPJ arthrodesis have rarely been studied. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of revision MTPJ arthrodesis following different primary procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of revision MTPJ arthrodesis cases between January 2015 and December 2019 was performed. The radiographic results, patient-reported outcomes, and rates of complications, subsequent revisions, and nonunions, were analyzed and compared preoperatively and postoperatively. A multivariate analysis was utilized to determine risk factors for complications and reoperations.

RESULTS

This study yielded a total of 79 cases of revision MTPJ arthrodesis. The mean follow-up time was 365 days (SD ± 295). The overall complication rate was 40.5%, of which the overall nonunion rate was 19.0%. Seven cases (8.9%) required further revision surgery. The multivariate analysis revealed that Diabetes mellitus was associated with significantly higher overall complication rates (p = 0.016), and nonunion was associated with "in-situ" joint preparation techniques (p = 0.042). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) significantly improved postoperatively (p < 0.001); However, PROMIS-10 physical health and PROMIS-10 mental health did not change significantly during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of MTPJ surgery failures is a clinical challenge in orthopedic surgery. In our study, revision of first MTPJ surgery resulted in higher nonunion rates and overall complication rates compared to typical outcomes from primary MTPJ arthrodesis. Diabetes, Tobacco use, and "in-situ" joint preparation technique were found to be independent risk factors for complications and reoperations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III-Retrospective Cohort Study.

Risk Factors Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes of Ankle Fractures Involving the Posterior Malleolus

Background

Ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus (PM) tend to result in inferior clinical outcomes compared to other ankle fractures. However, it is unclear which specific risk factors and fracture characteristics are associated with negative outcomes in these fractures. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for poor postoperative patient-reported outcomes in patients with fractures involving the PM.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients who sustained ankle fractures involving the PM between March 2016 and July 2020 and had preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. In total, 122 patients were included for analysis. One patient (0.8%) had an isolated PM fracture, 19 (15.6%) had bimalleolar ankle fractures involving the PM, and 102 (83.6%) had trimalleolar fractures. Fracture characteristics including the Lauge-Hansen (LH) and Haraguchi classifications and posterior malleolar fragment size were collected from preoperative CT scans. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. The association between various demographic and fracture characteristics with postoperative PROMIS scores was assessed.

Results

Involvement of more malleoli was associated with worse PROMIS Physical Function (P = .04), Global Physical Health (P = .04), and Global Mental Health (P < .001), and Depression scores (P = .001). Elevated BMI was also associated with worse PROMIS Physical Function (P = .0025), Pain Interference (P = .0013), and Global Physical Health (P = .012) scores. Time to surgery, fragment size, Haraguchi classification, and LH classification were not associated with PROMIS scores.

Conclusion

In this cohort, we found that trimalleolar ankle fractures were associated with inferior PROMIS outcomes compared with bimalleolar ankle fractures involving the PM in multiple domains.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Pre-Visit Digital Messaging Improves Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Participation Prior to the Orthopaedic Ambulatory Visit: Results from a Double-Blinded, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are metrics that assess physical health, mental health, pain, and satisfaction. However, PROM collection in orthopaedic clinics presents numerous logistical and financial challenges. These challenges are reduced when PROMs are completed before clinic encounters, relieving the workflow constraints of in-office PROM collection. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of 3 different methods with respect to pre-visit electronic PROM completion.

METHODS

Consecutive adult orthopaedic patients with no previous PROM participation were enrolled. Patients who registered with the electronic medical record (EMR) patient portal (MyChart) and with active e-mail addresses were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 arms: control (no pre-visit messages), MyChart (EMR patient portal pre-visit messages), and e-mail (e-mail pre-visit messages). The primary outcome measure was pre-visit PROM completion rates in orthopaedic patients, and the secondary outcome measures were time to pre-visit PROM form completion and PROM form completion rates according to patient demographic characteristics. By default, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) forms were available for completion through the portal by 7 days before scheduled visits. Pre-visit messages were sent 7 days prior to the scheduled visit except in the control group, with reminders sent 3 days prior if still not completed. The patients in each arm who completed all assigned forms were labeled as having total PROM completion, and those who completed at least 1 completed form were considered as having partial PROM completion. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess differences in PROM completion rates between study arms. Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to compare the date of the form completion.

RESULTS

A total of 291 patients were included. The pre-visit total completion rates for assigned PROMs were higher in the MyChart arm (49% of 97 patients; p = 0.005) and the e-mail arm (52% of 100 patients; p = 0.002) in comparison with the control arm (30% of 94 patients). Male patients were more likely than female patients to have partial pre-visit PROM completion (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; p = 0.03), and Caucasian patients were more likely to have partial pre-visit PROM completion than African American patients (OR, 2.28; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopaedic patients receiving either e-mail or patient portal messages demonstrated higher pre-visit PROM completion rates. Pre-visit messaging appears to be a useful strategy for increasing PROM completion rates and limiting the clinical workflow strain imposed by in-clinic PROM administration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Evaluation of Clinical Recovery After Surgical Treatment for Hand Ischemia From Vasospastic and Occlusive Disease Using PROMIS

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature describing the recovery trajectory after surgery for upper extremity ischemia. Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), Upper Extremity (UE), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression domains, we aimed to describe the postoperative recovery of such patients.

METHODS

We queried our PROMIS database for patients undergoing surgery for vasospastic or occlusive disease over a 4.5-year period. Inclusion criteria were preoperative, early (average 3 weeks) and late (average 6 months) postoperative PROMIS PF and/or UE, PI, and Depression scores. The change in PROMIS scores was calculated for each time point. Changes in PROMIS scores were compared with minimal clinically important difference estimates.

RESULTS

We identified 13 patients undergoing 13 surgical interventions that met inclusion criteria. More than one-half of our patients were men (n = 7 [54%]), and more than one-half of the surgeries (n = 7 [54%]) were for isolated occlusive diagnoses, with the remainder for vasospastic disease. At short-term postoperative follow-up, the change in PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression scores was -6.34 (SD: 9.13), -6.81 (SD: 9.61), 3.16 (SD: 5.78), and -3.05 (SD: 8.37), respectively. At mid-term postoperative follow-up, the change in PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression scores was 4.45 (SD: 10.33), 8.04 (SD: 13.84), -7.03 (SD: 7.06), and -12.27 (SD: 10.85), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest patients undergoing surgical treatment for upper extremity ischemia experience a worsening of functional symptoms initially, as expected, followed by notable improvement.

Clinical Improvement Following Operative Management of Ankle Fractures Among Patients With and Without Moderate to High Depressive Symptoms: An Analysis Using PROMIS

Background

Understanding the recovery trajectory following operative management of ankle fractures can help surgeons guide patient expectations. Further, it is beneficial to consider the impact of mental health on the recovery trajectory. Our study aimed to address the paucity of literature focused on understanding the recovery trajectory following surgery for ankle fractures, including in patients with depressive symptoms.

Methods

From February 2015 to March 2020, patients with isolated ankle fractures were asked to complete Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression questionnaires as part of routine care at presentation and follow-up time points. Linear mixed effects regression models were used to evaluate the patient recovery pattern, comparing the preoperative time point to <3 months, 3-6 months, and >6 months across all patients. Additional models that included the presence of depression symptoms as a covariate were then used.

Results

A total of 153 patients met inclusion criteria. By 3-6 months, PROMIS PF (β: 9.95, 95% CI: 7.97-11.94, P < .001), PI (β: -10.30, 95% CI: -11.87 to -8.72, P < .001), and Depression (β: -5.60, 95% CI: -7.01 to -4.20, P < .001) improved relative to the preoperative time point. This level of recovery was sustained thereafter. When incorporating depressive symptoms into our model as a covariate, the moderate to high depressive symptoms were associated with significantly and clinically important worse PROMIS PF (β: -4.00, 95% CI: -7.00 to -1.00, P = .01) and PI (β: 3.16, 95% CI: -0.55 to 5.76, P = .02) scores.

Conclusion

Following ankle fracture surgery, all patients tend to clinically improve by 3-6 months postoperatively and then continue to appreciate this clinical improvement. Although patients with moderate to high depressive symptoms also clinically improve following the same trajectory, they tend to do so to a lesser level than those who have low depressive symptoms.

Level of Evidence

Level III, case-control study.

Isolated Gastrocnemius Recession for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

INTRODUCTION

Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is frequently associated with a gastrocnemius contracture. Surgical treatment of PCFD often includes a gastrocnemius recession in addition to other corrective procedures, which typically requires a period of restricted weight bearing postoperatively. Isolated gastrocnemius recession may allow passive correction of the deformity, improve orthotic fit, and obviate the need for full reconstruction and restricted weight bearing. The goal of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes after an isolated gastrocnemius recession for flexible PCFD in patients anticipated to have difficulty with postoperative restricted weight bearing.

METHODS

A total of 47 patients met the inclusion criteria: isolated gastrocnemius recession for flexible PCFD, no previous ipsilateral surgery, and more than 6 months of follow-up. Of 47 eligible patients, 29 (31 feet) participated. Available preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes were gathered, including the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living, visual analog scale, and the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a. In addition, patients were asked about satisfaction, willingness to undergo the procedure again, and whether orthotics provided better relief.

RESULTS

At a mean of 5.1 (range, 0.6 to 9.0) years postoperatively, median Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living was 82.1, mean Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a was 44.2, and median visual analog scale was 10 (of 100). Sixty-nine percent of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied, 69% would undergo the procedure again, and 62% reported improved relief with use of orthotics postoperatively. Among the 47 eligible patients, there were 5 (11%) subsequent flatfoot reconstructions.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated gastrocnemius recession for the management of flexible PCFD can be effective as this procedure demonstrated good outcomes scores with high procedural satisfaction and 11% of patients proceeding to subsequent flatfoot reconstruction. This alternative approach may be of particular value for patients anticipated to have difficulty with postoperative weight-bearing restrictions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

:IV.

Are Radiographs Associated With Patient Satisfaction After Scarf Bunionectomy?

There are over 350,000 bunion surgeries performed in the USA annually, making it one of the most common elective forefoot surgeries. Studies have suggested that as many as 10% of patients remain dissatisfied after bunion surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if radiographic variables are associated with patient satisfaction at 1 year postoperatively. We performed a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data on 69 consecutive adult patients (mean age 45 ± 14 years, 91% female [63/69]) who underwent isolated hallux valgus surgery from January 2016 to January 2017. Subjects completed a standardized 4-item survey inquiring about their satisfaction with regards to pain relief, overall operative result, cosmetic appearance, and ability to wear desired shoe gear. Conventional radiographic indices for hallux valgus were examined preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. An association model using backward stepwise logistic regression was utilized to determine which variables, if any, are most important in explaining patient satisfaction after surgery. Sixty-nine subjects completed the 4-item satisfaction survey with 53.6% (37/69) of subjects answering they were fully satisfied on all aspects of the survey at 12 months postoperatively. In the final regression model, no radiographic or demographic variables were associated with patient satisfaction including shoe gear, cosmetic appearance, pain relief, and overall operative result. Radiographic variables did not appear to be associated with patient satisfaction at one year postoperatively in our study. Factors such as quality of life, anxiety levels, fear of surgery, and/or preoperative expectations may offer more insight into satisfaction; however, further research should be performed to examine this further.

Preoperative Opioid Use Is Associated With Inferior Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Following Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE

To determine the influence of preoperative opioid use on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores pre- and postoperatively in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all RCR patients aged >18 years old was performed. PROMIS pain interference ("PROMIS PI"), upper extremity function ("PROMIS UE"), and depression ("PROMIS D") scores, were reviewed. These measures were collected at preoperative, 6-month, and 1-year postoperative time points. A prescription drug-monitoring program was queried to track opioid prescriptions. Patients were categorized as chronic users, acute users, and nonusers based on prescriptions filled. Comparison of means were carried out using analysis of variance and least squares means. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 184 patients who underwent RCR were included. Preoperatively, nonusers (n = 92) had superior PROMIS UE (30.6 vs 28.9 vs 26.1; P < .05) and PI scores (61.5 vs 64.9 vs 65.3; P < .001) compared with acute users (n = 65) and chronic users (n = 27), respectively. At 6 months postoperatively; nonusers demonstrated significantly greater PROMIS UE (41.7 vs 35.6 vs. 33.5; P < .001), lower PROMIS D (41.6 vs 45.8 vs 51.1; P < .001), and lower PROMIS PI scores (50.7 vs 56.3 vs 58.1; P < .01) when compared with acute and chronic users, respectively. Nonusers had lower PROMIS PI (47.9 vs 54.3 vs 57.4; P < .0001) and PROMIS D (41.6 vs 48.3 vs 49.2; P = .0002) scores compared with acute and chronic users at 1-year postoperatively. Nonusers experienced a significantly greater magnitude of improvement in PROMIS D 6 months postoperatively compared with chronic opioid users (-5.9 vs 0.0; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing RCR demonstrated superior PROMIS scores pre- and postoperatively if they did not use opioids within 3 months before surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative trial.

The influence of concomitant hammertoe correction on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hallux valgus correction

BACKGROUND

Patients with hallux valgus often develop secondary hammertoe deformities of the lesser toes. Operative management of bunions with hammertoe can be more extensive; however, it is unclear whether this affects patient-reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative patient-reported outcome measures and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent isolated bunion correction and patients who underwent simultaneous bunion and hammertoe correction.

METHODS

Preoperative, postoperative, and change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were compared between patients who underwent isolated hallux valgus correction and those who underwent concomitant hammertoe correction. Radiographic measures including hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal-articular angle (DMAA), and Meary's angle were also compared. Targeted minimum-loss estimation (TMLE) was used for statistical analysis to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 221 feet (134 isolated bunion correction, 87 concomitant hammertoe correction) with a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included in this study. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in the physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and global physical health PROMIS domains (all p < 0.001). However, patients in the concomitant hammertoe cohort had significantly less improvements in pain interference and pain intensity (p < 0.01, p < 0.05 respectively). The concomitant hammertoe cohort also had significantly higher postoperative pain interference scores than the isolated bunion cohort (p < 0.01). Radiographic outcomes did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

While both isolated bunion correction and concomitant hammertoe correction yielded clinically significant improvements in patient reported outcomes and normalized radiographic parameters, patients undergoing simultaneous bunion and hammertoe correction experienced substantially less improvement in postoperative pain-related outcomes than those who underwent isolated bunion correction.

Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores and Postoperative Outcomes in Hallux Rigidus Patients Undergoing Cheilectomy

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that preoperative patient-reported outcome measures are associated with postoperative outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, and also in specific procedures such as bunionectomy, flatfoot reconstruction, and total ankle replacement. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression scores were associated with the ability of patients undergoing cheilectomy for hallux rigidus to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of improvement.

METHODS

This retrospective study included preoperative and ≥2-year postoperative PROMIS physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression scores for 125 feet in 118 patients undergoing cheilectomy collected from an institutional review board (IRB)-approved foot and ankle registry database. MCIDs were established using distribution-based methods to determine clinical significance of improvements in PROMIS scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve analyses were used to determine which preoperative PROMIS scores were associated with patients meeting the MCID.

RESULTS

ROC analysis found statistically significant areas under the curve (AUCs) for the physical function domain (AUC 0.71), pain intensity (AUC 0.70), and depression (AUC 0.79) PROMIS domains. Subsequent analyses were unable to identify clinically useful 95% sensitivity and specificity preoperative thresholds, with the exception of the 95% sensitivity PROMIS physical function threshold. A preoperative physical function score of greater than 53.2 resulted in a 63% probability of achieving the MCID. The pain interference PROMIS domain did not demonstrate a statistically significant AUC.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PROMIS physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression scores are minimally associated with preoperative to 2-year postoperative improvement in patients undergoing cheilectomy. It may be difficult to determine which patients improve from a cheilectomy based on the severity of symptoms they exhibit preoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Risk factors for failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference and significant clinical benefit in PROMIS computer adaptive test domains in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has emerged as a valid and efficient means of collecting outcomes in patients with rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to establish threshold score changes to determine minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) in PROMIS computer adaptive test (CAT) scores following rotator cuff repair (RCR). Additionally, we sought to identify potential risk factors for failing to achieve MCID and SCB.

METHODS

Patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR were identified over a 24-month period. Only patients who completed both preoperative and postoperative PROMIS CAT assessments were included in this cohort. PROMIS CAT forms for upper extremity physical function (PROMIS-UE), pain interference (PROMIS-PI), and depression (PROMIS-D) were used with a minimum of 1.5-year follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed to determine threshold score changes to determine anchor-based MCID and SCB, as well as risk factors for failure to achieve significant clinical improvement following surgery.

RESULTS

Of 198 eligible patients, 168 (84.8%) were included in analysis. ΔPROMIS-UE values of 5.8 and 9.7 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.906 and 0.949, respectively) and ΔPROMIS-PI values of -11.4 and -12.9 (AUC = 0.875 and 0.938, respectively) were identified as threshold predictors of MCID and SCB achievement. On average, 81%, 65%, and 55% of patients achieved MCID for PROMIS-UE, PROMIS-PI, and PROMIS-D whereas 71%, 61%, and 38% of patients in the cohort, respectively, achieved SCB. MCID achievement in PROMIS-UE significantly differed according to risk factors, including smoking status (likelihood ratio [LR]: 9.8, P = .037), tear size (LR: 10.4, P < .001), distal clavicle excision (LR: 6.1, P = .005), and prior shoulder surgery (LR: 19.2, P < .001). Factors influencing SCB achievement for PROMIS-UE were smoking status (LR: 9.3, P = .022), tear size (LR: 8.0, P = .039), and prior shoulder surgery (11.9, P < .001). Significantly different rates of MCID and SCB achievement in PROMIS-PI for smoking status (LR: 7.0, P = .030, and LR: 5.2, P = .045) and prior shoulder surgery (LR: 9.1, P = .002, and LR: 7.4, P = .006) were also identified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The majority of patients showed clinically significant improvements that exceeded the established MCID for PROMIS-UE and PROMIS-PI following RCR. Patients with larger tear sizes, a history of prior shoulder surgery, tobacco users, and those who received concomitant distal clavicle excision were at risk for failing to achieve MCID in PROMIS-UE. Additionally, smokers and patients who underwent prior shoulder surgery demonstrated significantly lower improvements in pain scores following surgery.

Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit for the Pain Visual Analog Scale in a Postoperative Hand Surgery Population

PURPOSE

Although the pain visual analog scale (VAS-pain) is a ubiquitous patient-reported outcome instrument, it remains unclear how to interpret changes or differences in scores. Therefore, our purpose was to calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the VAS-pain instrument in a nonshoulder hand and upper extremity postoperative population.

METHODS

Adult postoperative patients treated by 1 of 5 fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons at a single tertiary academic medical center were identified. Inclusion required VAS-pain scores at baseline (up to 3 months before surgery) and follow-up (up to 4 months after surgery), in addition to a response to a pain-specific anchor question at follow-up. The MCID estimates were calculated with (1) the 1/2 standard deviation method; and (2) an anchor-based approach. The SCB estimates were calculated with (1) an anchor-based approach; and (2) a receiver operator curve method that maximized the sensitivity and specificity for detecting a "much improved" pain status.

RESULTS

There were 667 and 148 total patients included in the MCID and SCB analyses, respectively. The 1/2 standard deviation MCID estimate was 1.6, and the anchor-based estimate was 1.9. The anchor-based SCB estimate was 2.2. The receiver operator curve analysis yielded an SCB estimate of 2.6, with an area under the curve of 0.72, consistent with acceptable discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose MCID values in the range of 1.6 to 1.9 and SCB values in the range of 2.2 to 2.6 for the VAS-pain instrument in a nonshoulder hand and upper extremity postoperative population.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These MCID and SCB estimates may be useful for powering clinical studies and when interpreting VAS-pain score changes or differences reported in the hand surgery literature. These values are to be applied at a population level, and should not be applied to assess the improvement, or lack thereof, for individual patients.

Subtalar Fusion for Correction of Forefoot Abduction in Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

BACKGROUND

Correction of talonavicular uncoverage (TNU) in adult-acquired flatfoot deformities (AAFD) can be a challenge. Lateral column lengthening (LCL) traditionally is utilized to address this. The primary study objective is examining stage II AAFD patients and determining if correction can be achieved with subtalar fusion (STF) comparable to LCL.

METHODS

Following institutional review board approval, retrospective chart review performed identifying patients meeting criteria for stage IIB AAFD who underwent either STF with concomitant flatfoot procedures (but not LCL) to correct TNU, or who underwent LCL as part of their flatfoot reconstruction. Patients indicated for STF had one or more of the following: higher body mass index (BMI), were older, had greater deformity, lateral impingement pain, intraoperative spring ligament hyperlaxity. Patients without 1-year follow-up or compete records were excluded. All other patients were included. A total of 27 isolated STFs identified, along with 143 who underwent LCL. Pre-/postoperative radiographic parameters obtained as well as PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) and FAOS (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score) scores. Radiographic and patient reported outcomes both preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up evaluated for both groups.

RESULTS

STF patients were older (P < .05), with higher BMIs (P < .004). STF had significantly worse TNU (P < .001) than LCL patients, and average change in STF TNU was larger than LCL change postoperatively (P = .006), after adjusting for age, BMI, gender. PROMIS STF improvement reached statistical significance in Physical Function (P 0.011), for FAOS Pain (P 0.025) and Function (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

STF can be used in appropriately indicated patients to correct flatfoot deformity without compromising radiographic or clinical, correcting not only hindfoot valgus, but also talonavicular uncoverage (TNU) and corresponding medial arch collapse.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective chart review comparison study (case control).

High Pain Catastrophizing Scale Predicts Lower Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Foot and Ankle Patient

BACKGROUND

Postoperative outcomes may be affected by the patient's preoperative morbidity. It is hypothesized that patient's pain catastrophization prior to foot and ankle surgery may affect their patient-reported outcomes. Methods: This study prospectively assessed a consecutive cohort of 46 patients undergoing foot and ankle reconstruction to describe the relationship between Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and patient-reported outcomes measured by 12-item Short Form Health Survey and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).

RESULTS

The 1-year postoperative FAOS pain, activities of daily living, and quality of life scores correlated significantly with all baseline PCS subcategories. We found that the mental domain of the SF-12 had a statistically significant correlation with the rumination and helplessness PCS subcategories.

CONCLUSION

This study showed a significant association between a high preoperative PCS and a worse 1-year FAOS. As such, catastrophization could be screened for and potentially treated preoperatively to improve patient-reported outcomes in elective foot and ankle surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level III Evidence.

What Does Your PROMIS Score Mean? Improving the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcomes at the Point of Care

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has been validated for lumbar spine. Use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures can improve clinical decision making and health literacy at the point of care. Use of PROMIS, however, has been limited in part because clinicians and patients lack plain language understanding of the meaning of scores and it remains unclear how best to use them at the point of care. The purpose was to develop plain language descriptions to apply to PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores and to assess patient understanding and preferences in presentation of their individualized PRO information.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected PROMIS PF v1.2 and PI v1.1 for patients presenting to a tertiary spine center for back/lower extremity complaints was performed. Patients with missing scores, standard error >0.32, and assessments with <4 or >12 questions were excluded. Scores were categorized into score groups, specifically PROMIS PF groups were: <18, 20 ± 2, 25 ± 2, 30 ± 2, 35 ± 2, 40 ± 2, 45 ± 2, 50 ± 2, 55 ± 2, 60 ± 2, and >62; and PROMIS PI groups were: <48, 50 ± 2, 55 ± 2, 60 ± 2, 65 ± 2, 70 ± 2, 75 ± 2, 80 ± 2, and >82. Representative questions and answers from the PROMIS PI and PROMIS PF were selected for each score group, where questions with <25 assessments or representing <15% of assessments were excluded. Two fellowship-trained spine surgeons further trimmed the questions to create a streamlined clinical tool using a consensus process. Plain language descriptions for PROMIS PF were then used in a prospective assessment of 100 consecutive patients. Patient preference for consuming the score data was recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 12 712 assessments/5524 unique patients were included for PF and 14 823 assessments/6582 unique patients for PI. More than 90% of assessments were completed in 4 questions. The number of assessments and patients per scoring group were normally distributed. The mean PF score was 37.2 ± 8.2 and the mean PI was 63.3 ± 7.4. Plain language descriptions and compact clinical tool was were generated. Prospectively 100 consecutive patients were surveyed for their preference in receiving their T-score versus plain language description versus graphical presentation. A total of 78% of patients found receiving personalized PRO data helpful, while only 1% found this specifically not helpful. Overall, 80% of patients found either graphical or plain language more helpful than T-score alone, and half of these preferred plain language and graphical descriptions together. In total, 89% of patients found the plain language descriptions to be accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at the point of care are interested in receiving the results of their PRO measures. Plain language descriptions of PROMIS scores enhance patient understanding of PROMIS numerical scores. Patients preferred plain language and/or graphical representation rather than a numerical score alone. While PROs are commonly used for assessing outcomes in research, use at point of care is a growing interest and this study clarifies how they might be utilized in physician-patient communication.

Predictors of PROMIS Physical Function at 2 Years following Knee Surgery

The purpose of this study was to evaluate Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS PF) 2 years following knee surgery, and identify preoperative factors associated with postoperative PROMIS PF. Three hundred and sixty-five patients, age 17 years and older, undergoing knee surgery at one institution were studied. Patients completed multiple questionnaires prior to surgery and again 2 years postoperatively including PROMIS PF, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), joint and body numeric pain scales (NPS), Tegner's activity scale (TAS), and Marx's activity rating scale (MARS). Mean PROMIS PF improved from 41.4 to 50.9 at 2 years postoperatively (p < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with 2-year IKDC scores. Older age, female gender, non-Hispanic ethnicity, unemployment, lower income, government insurance, smoking, preoperative opioid use, having a legal claim, comorbidities, previous surgeries, higher body mass index (BMI), and knee arthroplasty were associated with worse 2-year PROMIS PF. Multivariable analysis confirmed that lower BMI, less NPS body pain, and higher MARS were independent predictors of greater 2-year PROMIS PF and better improvement in PROMIS PF. In this large, broad cohort of knee surgery patients, multiple preoperative factors were associated with PROMIS PF 2 years postoperatively. PROMIS PF scores improved significantly, but worse 2 year PROMIS PF scores and less improvement from baseline were independently predicted by higher BMI, greater NPS body pain, and lower MARS activity level. PROMIS PF can be implemented as an efficient means to assess outcomes after knee surgery.

Impact of Asymptomatic Flatfoot on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Modified Lapidus Procedure in Patients With Hallux Valgus

Background

Patients with hallux valgus commonly present with concomitant flatfoot deformity. First-ray hypermobility, among other biomechanical factors, has been suggested as a potential link between these deformities. However, not all hallux valgus patients exhibit symptoms associated with flatfoot deformity, and the necessity of correcting the asymptomatic flatfoot at the time of hallux valgus correction is unclear. We aimed to investigate the relationship between asymptomatic flatfoot and patient-reported and radiographic outcomes after the Lapidus procedure.

Methods

This study included 142 patients who underwent the Lapidus procedure for hallux valgus at a single institution. Sixty-one patients met radiographic criteria for flatfoot. No patients exhibited symptoms related to flatfoot deformity on review of clinical notes. Preoperative, minimum 1-year postoperative, and change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores between asymptomatic flatfoot and control groups were compared. Radiographic outcomes including hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), Meary angle, talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), and calcaneal pitch (CP) were compared.

Results

Preoperatively, the flatfoot group had higher BMI 22.6 vs 24.6 (P < .01) and IMA 15.32 vs 14.0 degrees (P < .05). Both groups demonstrated preoperative to postoperative improvement in PROMIS physical function (P < .01), pain interference (P < .001), pain intensity (P < .001), and global physical health (P < .001). There were no preoperative or postoperative differences in PROMIS scores between groups. Postoperatively, there were no differences in HVA or IMA between groups; however, the flatfoot group exhibited greater deformity in Meary angle, TNCA, and CP (all P < .001).

Conclusion

There were no significant postoperative differences in patient-reported outcomes of the Lapidus procedure between patients with and without asymptomatic flatfoot, and both groups achieved similar radiographic correction of their hallux valgus deformity. The Lapidus procedure appears to be a reasonable surgical option for hallux valgus correction in patients with asymptomatic flatfoot deformity.Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The performance of PROMIS computer adaptive testing for patient-reported outcomes in hip fracture surgery: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to patient-centered care in orthopaedics. PROMIS measures have demonstrated reliability, validity, responsiveness, and minimal floor and ceiling effects in various populations of patients receiving orthopaedic care but have not yet been examined in hip fracture patients. This pilot study sought to evaluate the psychometric performance of the PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS PF) and Pain Interference (PROMIS PI) computer adaptive tests and compare these instruments with legacy outcome measures in hip fracture patients.

METHODS

This study included 67 patients who were 27-96 years old (median 76) and underwent osteosynthesis for a proximal femoral fracture. At 3, 6, and/or 12 months follow-up, patients completed both legacy (mHHS, SF-36-PCS, and VAS for pain) and PROMIS questionnaires (PROMIS PF and PROMIS PI). Respondent burden and floor/ceiling effects were calculated for each outcome measure. Correlation was calculated to determine concurrent validity between related constructs.

RESULTS

A strong correlation was found between PROMIS PF and mHHS (rho = 0.715, p < 0.001) and moderately strong correlation between PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS (rho = 0.697, p < 0.001). There was also a moderately strong correlation between the VAS and the PROMIS PI (rho = 0.641, p < 0.001). Patients who completed PROMIS PF were required to answer significantly fewer questions as compared with legacy PROMs (mHHS, SF-36). For the PROMIS measures, 1% of patients completing PROMIS PF achieved the highest allowable score while 34% of patients completing PROMIS PI achieved the lowest allowable score. Of the legacy outcome measures, 31% of patients completing the VAS for pain achieved the lowest allowable score and 7% of patients completing the mHHS achieved the highest allowable score.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support the validity of PROMIS CATs for use in hip fracture patients. The PROMIS PF was significantly correlated with SF-36 PCS and mHHS while requiring fewer question items per patient relative to the legacy outcome measures.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference in Patients Following Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture

PURPOSE

We estimated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) computer adaptive tests (CATs) following surgical treatment of distal radius fracture (DRF).

METHODS

Adult patients surgically treated between November 2017 and November 2020 for isolated DRF were identified. Demographic and patient-reported outcome data were extracted from the electronic health record. Outcomes of interest were the PROMIS PF and PI CATs. Inclusion criteria were met if: (1) PROMIS PF and PI scores were available at preoperative and postoperative visits; and (2) a postoperative clinical anchor question asking about overall response to treatment was answered. An anchor-based MCID estimate was determined by calculating the average absolute score change in PROMIS PF and PI for patients who indicated a mild change to the anchor question. A distribution-based MCID estimate was also calculated using the standard error of measurement and effect sizes of change.

RESULTS

The changes in PROMIS PF and PI scores were significantly different between patients who gave responses of much change (n = 73), mild change (n = 51), and no change (n = 19) to the clinical anchor question. The average score changes in the mild change group for PROMIS PF and PI were 5.2 (SD, 3.7) and 6.8 (SD, 4.3) points, respectively, representing the anchor-based MCID estimates. The PROMIS PI anchor-based estimate was moderately correlated with the preoperative score (r = -0.41), time between visits (r = -0.39), and age (r = 0.30). The distribution-based MCID estimates were 3.8 (SD, 1.3) and 3.7 (SD, 1.3) points for the PROMIS PF and PI, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MCIDs were estimated as 5.2 and 6.8 for the PROMIS PF and PI CATs, respectively, following surgery for DRF.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As reports continue to publish a consistent range of MCID values, researchers can be confident in these values and begin using them across a broader spectrum of conditions treated by hand surgeons.