1
|
Temporal Trends in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Influenced by COVID-19 Pandemic. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11216433. [PMID: 36362660 PMCID: PMC9655378 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic influences the health care management of acute and chronic diseases. Data concerning the influence of the pandemic on hospitalizations of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are sparse. Methods: We analysed all patients hospitalized due to PAD between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020 in Germany. Hospitalizations of PAD patients during the pre-pandemic year 2019 were compared to the pandemic year 2020. Results: Overall, 361,029 hospitalizations of PAD patients in the years 2019 and 2020 (55.4% aged ≥70 years; 36.6% females) were included in this study. In the pre-pandemic year of 2019, a total of 25,501 (13.2%) more hospitalizations due to PAD were detected compared to the COVID-19 pandemic year of 2020 (2019: 192,765 [53.4%] vs. 2020: 168,264 [46.6%], p = 0.065). Overall, in 610 (0.4%) of the hospitalization cases, a COVID-19 infection was diagnosed. Regarding interventional/surgical treatments, total numbers of peripheral endovascular intervention of the lower extremity decreased by 9.9% (83,845 vs. 75,519, p < 0.001), surgical peripheral artery revascularization of the lower extremity by 11.4% (32,447 vs. 28,754, p = 0.041) and amputations by 4.0% (20,612 vs. 19,784, p < 0.001) in 2020 compared to 2019. The case fatality rate (2.6% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001), as well as MACCE rate (3.4% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), were slightly higher during the pandemic year 2020 compared to the pre-pandemic year 2019. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the number of hospitalizations of PAD patients with a 13.2% reduction in hospital admissions and decreased total numbers of revascularization and amputation treatments.
Collapse
|
2
|
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on In-Patient Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease in Germany during the First Pandemic Wave. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11072008. [PMID: 35407616 PMCID: PMC8999867 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11072008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) belong to a vulnerable population with relevant comorbidity. Appropriate care and timely treatment are imperative, but not readily assured in the current pandemic. What impact did the first wave have on in-hospital treatment in Germany? Nationwide healthcare remuneration data for inpatient care of the years 2019 and 2020 were used to compare demographic baseline data including the assessment of comorbidity (van Walraven score), as well as the encoded treatments. A direct comparison was made between the first wave of infections in 2020 and the reference period in 2019. The number of inpatient admissions decreased by 10.9%, with a relative increase in hospitalizations due to PAD Fontaine IV (+13.6%). Baseline demographics and comorbidity showed no relevant differences. The proportion of emergency admissions increased from 23.4% to 28.3% during the first wave to the reference period in 2019, and in-hospital mortality increased by 21.9% from 2.5% to 3.1%. Minor and major amputations increased by 24.5% and 18.5%. Endovascular and combined surgical/endovascular treatment strategies increased for all stages. Already in the first, comparatively mild wave of the pandemic, significantly fewer patients with predominantly higher-grade PAD stages were treated as inpatients. Consecutively, in-hospital mortality and amputation rates increased.
Collapse
|
3
|
D’Ardes D, Boccatonda A, Cocco G, Fabiani S, Rossi I, Bucci M, Guagnano MT, Schiavone C, Cipollone F. Impaired coagulation, liver dysfunction and COVID-19: Discovering an intriguing relationship. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:1102-1112. [PMID: 35431501 PMCID: PMC8985482 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i11.1102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is, at present, one of the most relevant global health problems. In the literature hepatic alterations have been described in COVID-19 patients, and they are mainly represented by worsening of underlying chronic liver disease leading to hepatic decompensation and liver failure with higher mortality. Several potential mechanisms used by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to cause liver damage have been hypothesized. COVID-19 primary liver injury is less common than secondary liver injury. Most of the available data demonstrate how liver damage in SARS-CoV-2 infection is likely due to systemic inflammation, and it is less likely mediated by a cytopathic effect directed on liver cells. Moreover, liver alterations could be caused by hypoxic injury and drugs (antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, remdesivir, tocilizumab, tofacitinib and dexamethasone). SARS-CoV-2 infection can induce multiple vascular district atherothrombosis by affecting simultaneously cerebral, coronary and peripheral vascular beds. Data in the literature highlight how the virus triggers an exaggerated immune response, which added to the cytopathic effect of the virus can induce endothelial damage and a prothrombotic dysregulation of hemostasis. This leads to a higher incidence of symptomatic and confirmed venous thrombosis and of pulmonary embolisms, especially in central, lobar or segmental pulmonary arteries, in COVID-19. There are currently fewer data for arterial thrombosis, while myocardial injury was identified in 7%-17% of patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection and 22%-31% in the intensive care unit setting. Available data also revealed a higher occurrence of stroke and more serious forms of peripheral arterial disease in COVID-19 patients. Hemostasis dysregulation is observed during the COVID-19 course. Lower platelet count, mildly increased prothrombin time and increased D-dimer are typical laboratory features of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, described as "COVID-19 associated coagulopathy." These alterations are correlated to poor outcomes. Moreover, patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection are characterized by high levels of von Willebrand factor with subsequent ADAMTS13 deficiency and impaired fibrinolysis. Platelet hyperreactivity, hypercoagulability and hypofibrinolysis during SARS-CoV-2 infection induce a pathological state named as "immuno-thromboinflammation." Finally, liver dysfunction and coagulopathy are often observed at the same time in patients with COVID-19. The hypothesis that liver dysfunction could be mediated by microvascular thrombosis has been supported by post-mortem findings and extensive vascular portal and sinusoidal thrombosis observation. Other evidence has shown a correlation between coagulation and liver damage in COVID-19, underlined by the transaminase association with coagulopathy, identified through laboratory markers such as prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, D-dimer, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products and platelet count. Other possible mechanisms like immunogenesis of COVID-19 damage or massive pericyte activation with consequent vessel wall fibrosis have been suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano D’Ardes
- “Clinica Medica” Institute, Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Andrea Boccatonda
- Unit of Ultrasound, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Giulio Cocco
- Unit of Ultrasound, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Stefano Fabiani
- Unit of Ultrasound, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Ilaria Rossi
- “Clinica Medica” Institute, Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Marco Bucci
- “Clinica Medica” Institute, Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Guagnano
- “Clinica Medica” Institute, Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Cosima Schiavone
- Unit of Ultrasound, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Francesco Cipollone
- “Clinica Medica” Institute, Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|