Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: clinical considerations of alternative anticoagulation with various glycosaminoglycans and thrombin inhibitors

Apixaban as an alternate oral anticoagulant for the management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Due to the pronounced hypercoagulable state in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), alternatives to heparin that do not interact with HIT antibodies are needed for anticoagulation management. This study was designed to determine whether the oral factor Xa inhibitor apixaban could be used. Functional platelet activation with apixaban in the presence of HIT antibodies was evaluated by the (14)C-serotonin release assay (SRA; washed platelets) and the heparin-induced platelet aggregation assay (PA-HIT; platelet-rich plasma). A consistent absence of platelet activation by apixaban (0.05-50 μg/mL) was observed: SRA (n = 35) 11 ± 4% and PA-HIT (n = 37) 8 ± 3% (mean ± standard error of the mean; positive is >20%) versus heparin (0.1 U/mL) 82 ± 3% SRA and 78 ± 6% PA-HIT (P < 0.01) versus enoxaparin (10 μg/mL) 73 ± 5% SRA and 62 ± 7% PA-HIT. Apixaban may provide an option for oral anticoagulation in patients with HIT, particularly for extended management and prevention.

Emphasis on the Role of PF4 in the Incidence, Pathophysiology and Treatment of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4) associated with polyanionic glycosaminoglycan drugs or displayed on vascular cell membranes. These antibodies are elicited by multimolecular complexes that can occur when heparin is administered in clinical settings associated with abundant PF4. Heparin binding alters native PF4 and elicits immune recognition and response. While the presence of heparin is integral to immunogenesis, the HIT antibody binding site is within PF4. Thus HIT antibodies develop and function to cause thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis only in the presence of PF4. Future emphasis on understanding the biology, turnover and regulation of PF4 may lead to insights into the prevention and treatment of HIT.

Activation of platelets by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies in the serotonin release assay is not dependent on the presence of heparin

The serotonin release assay (SRA) tests for antibodies responsible for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). By definition, SRA-positive antibodies cause platelet serotonin release in vitro, in the presence of low concentrations of heparin, but not with excess heparin. Many SRA-positive sera activate platelets in the presence of saline without drug, either as a result of residual heparin in the specimen, or because of intrinsic features of the HIT antibodies. The present experiments show that neither exhaustive heparinase treatment, nor chromatographic removal of heparin abrogates the spontaneous platelet activation caused by these HIT antibodies. This is the first study to systematically demonstrate that in vitro activity of HIT antibodies can be independent of heparin. In addition, T-gel chromatography demonstrated differences among fractions of enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-positive HIT antibodies within individual specimens. Certain ELISA-positive fractions had SRA activity while others did not, and the SRA activity was not proportional to HIT antibody ELISA titer. These data suggest that antibodies formed as a result of heparin treatment are heterogeneous, and that some can contribute to the pathogenesis of HIT even when heparin is no longer present.

Unfractionated heparin compared with low-molecular-weight heparin as related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a severe side effect of treatment with unfractionated heparin. The relation of low-molecular-weight heparin to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is less well understood. This review will summarize what is known about the similarities and differences between thrombocytopenia induced by low-molecular-weight heparin and that induced by unfractionated heparin.

RECENT FINDINGS

The pathophysiology of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, caused by the development of antibodies to heparin/platelet factor 4 complexes, holds true for low-molecular-weight heparin because the molecules of the latter are of the same saccharidic structure as those of unfractionated heparin. Owing to their smaller size, however, low-molecular-weight heparin does not interact with platelet factor 4 and platelets as efficiently as does unfractionated heparin. This translates to a two- to threefold lower risk of immune sensitization (antibody generation and occurrence of clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia). Low-molecular-weight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies are more often immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin M, in contrast to the immunoglobulin G antibodies generated with unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which tend to be more often associated with clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The clinical expression of low-molecular-weight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is generally similar to that of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia but can have a slower onset, more severe thrombocytopenia, and slower platelet count recovery. Given that low-molecular-weight heparin, of itself, is linked with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia pathophysiology and it can interact with most preexisting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies generated after exposure to unfractionated heparin, treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients with low-molecular-weight heparin is contraindicated.

SUMMARY

The risk of the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with low-molecular-weight heparin treatment is reduced relative to the frequency of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, but it is not eliminated, and platelet counts should be monitored with treatment.

Development of Generic Low Molecular Weight Heparins: A Perspective

It is clear that the introduction of generic versions of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) is inevitable; however, it is important that the generic products are manufactured in strict compliance with the manufacturing specification of the branded product. Furthermore, regulatory agencies should require additional data on the chemical biologic, pharmacologic/toxicologic, and dose-response relationship in specific settings. Although there is strong opposition to stop the introduction of these drugs, their development will reduce cost and permit availability to all patients who need them. Some objective guidelines for the proper development of these drugs are needed. Only expert groups and advisory panels to the regulatory bodies can develop these guidelines.

Selective factor Xa inhibition improves efficacy of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery

Venous thromboembolism is a serious, frequent, and potentially fatal complication of major orthopedic surgery. Currently available pharmacologic agents for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in this high-risk population consist of the oral anticoagulants and the heparin family of antithrombotic agents (unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, heparinoids). These classes of agents interfere with the activity of both thrombin and factor Xa (or their respective zymogens) to varying degrees. Newer antithrombotic agents in various stages of development exert their antithrombotic effect through a more targeted mechanism of action. Direct factor Xa inhibitors and the newest class of antithrombotic agents, the indirect factor Xa inhibitors, the prototype of which is the synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux sodium, limit fibrin formation through their exclusive inactivation of factor Xa. Clinical data from venous thromboembolism prophylaxis trials in hip and knee replacement and hip fracture surgeries, including the recently completed fondaparinux phase II and phase III trials, indicate that selective antifactor Xa activity may improve the efficacy:safety ratio of antithrombotic therapies for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in high-risk major orthopedic surgery.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, paradoxical thromboembolism, and other adverse effects of heparin-type therapy

This article discusses the common and uncommon side effects of heparin and heparin-like therapy. Most attention is devoted to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, as it is the most clinically aggressive adverse reaction. Additionally, less common and several newly reported side effects are discussed.

Heparin is not required for detection of antibodies associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), with or without thrombosis, is a common and often serious complication of heparin therapy. Platelet-activating, heparin-induced antibodies characteristic of HIT are thought to be specific for complexes formed between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, and such complexes are routinely used for antibody detection. We studied the binding of HIT antibodies to PF4 complexed with heparin fractions of uniform molecular size or linear polyanions other than heparin and found that many compounds other than heparin form complexes with PF4 that are suitable for antibody detection, provided they carry strong negative charges spaced about 0.5 nm apart along the molecular backbone and are of sufficient length to span about 40% of the circumference of the PF4 tetramer. Polyvinyl phosphonate was among the compounds that were equivalent to heparin. Thus neither a polysaccharide chain nor sulfate side groups--the hallmarks of heparin structure--are required for HIT antibody detection. The findings support the view that antibodies associated with HIT are specific for conformational changes that take place in the positively charged PF4 molecule when it reacts with a suitable, linear polyanion.

Inhibition of tissue factor-activated platelets by low-molecular-weight heparins and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist

Thrombotic disorders can lead to vascular distress and platelet activation eventually resulting in the rupture of the lesions where a sizable amount of tissue factor (TF) is generated during the pathogenesis of arterial diseases. Since low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are clinically used for the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), studies were taken to determine the effects of these agents on TF-mediated activation of platelets. Freshly drawn native whole blood (WB) from normal healthy volunteers (n = 6) supplemented with a predetermined amount of TF was incubated with equivalent anti-Xa adjusted amounts of various LMWHs at 0.01-1.0 U/ml and tirofiban from 10 to 100 ng/ml. Platelet activation was assessed by measuring the expression of P-selectin (CD62) and the generation of platelet aggregates. At 0.01 U/ml, enoxaparin exhibited a stronger inhibition of TF-induced platelet activation compared to ardeparin and dalteparin. At 0.1 U/ml, these LMWHs produced a comparable inhibition of total P-selectin expression, and at 1.0 U/ml, a marked inhibition was noted. Since enoxaparin produced the best concentration-dependent inhibition of P-selectin expression (saline: 76 +/- 10% vs. 1.0 U/ml enoxaparin: 18 +/- 7%; P < .02) and platelet aggregate formation (saline: 63 +/- 7% vs. 1.0 U/ml enoxaparin: 35 +/- 6%, P < .035), this agent was used for additional studies. Unlike enoxaparin, tirofiban produced a weak concentration-dependent inhibition of platelet activation. At 100 ng/ml, tirofiban produced a 40% inhibition of P-selectin expression and about 60% inhibition of platelet aggregate formation. To elucidate the potential interaction between tirofiban and enoxaparin, the effect of 10 and 100 ng/ml tirofiban was studied with enoxaparin-supplemented WB in a 0.01-1.0 U/ml range. Additive effects between these two agents were noted only at lower concentrations. Thus, at therapeutic concentrations (0.8-1.2 U/ml), enoxaparin itself was capable of inhibiting TF-mediated activation of platelets to > 70%; whereas tirofiban failed to produce such concentration-dependent inhibition. This suggests that the simultaneous administration of GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist with LMWH may not have any added benefit in the clinical management of patients with ACS.

Pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Clinical and diagnostic implications--a review

OBJECTIVE

This review of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the most frequent and dangerous side effect of heparin exposure, covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease syndrome.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Current consensus of opinion is given based on literature reports, as well as new information where available. A comprehensive analysis of the reasons for discrepancies in incidence numbers is given. The currently known mechanism is that HIT is mediated by an antibody to the complex of heparin->platelet factor 4, which binds to the Fc receptor on platelets. New evidence suggests a functional heterogeneity in the anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies generated to heparin, and a "superactive" heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody that does not require the presence of heparin to promote platelet activation or aggregation has been identified. Up-regulation of cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory markers, as well as preactivation of platelets/endothelial cells/leukocytes, are also considered to be related to the pathophysiology of HIT. Issues related to the specificity of currently available and new laboratory assays that support a clinical diagnosis are addressed in relation to the serotonin-release assay. Past experience with various anticoagulant treatments is reviewed with a focus on the recent successes of thrombin inhibitors and platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors to combat the platelet activation and severe thrombotic episodes associated with HIT.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathophysiology of HIT is multifactorial. However, the primary factor in the mediation of the cellular activation is due to the generation of an antibody to the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. This review is written as a reference for HIT research.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenic potential of GAG and non-GAG-based antithrombotic agents

We have undertaken these studies of the heparin-like, or glycosaminoglycan, and nonglycosaminoglycan-based antithrombotics in an effort to add to the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanism of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia by investigations of how glycosaminoglycan-related agents interact with the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies. The low molecular weight heparins, originally thought to be useful alternatives to heparin because of their smaller size, show platelet activation and aggregation responses in platelet heparin-induced thrombocytopenia serum systems (P-selectin expression, microparticle formation, serotonin release, platelet aggregation). Although the molecular mass and sulfation of the heparinoid Lomoparan is similar to that of heparin and low molecular weight heparins, its chemical structure is different and probably is not recognized by the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies. The heparin-related pentasaccharide did not show a positive reaction in any system of platelet activation/aggregation. These studies have shown that the antibodies produced in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia are reactive to highly sulfated glycosaminoglycans and nonglycosaminoglycan agents and less dependent on the molecular mass of these agents; whether the agent is a heparin or nonheparin compound was not critical. A combination of a moderate sulfation but low molecular mass in a heparin-like molecule was sufficient to prevent interaction with the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies. However, a chemical structure that is different from heparin (e.g., a heparinoid or a thrombin inhibitor) will also be nonreactive to platelet activation by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies.

Inadequacy of current prevention strategies for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is one of the most difficult problems facing clinicians today. Despite recent understanding of the pathophysiology of this disorder, there are many unresolved issues about diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. In this article, difficulties physicians encounter when faced with a suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patient will be reviewed as well as our experience in 113 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia which highlights the failure of current preventive strategies for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The experience of using warfarin in 51 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia will also be reviewed.