R-hirudin as anticoagulant in regular hemodialysis therapy: finding of therapeutic R-hirudin blood/plasma concentrations and respective dosages

Anticoagulative strategies in reconstructive surgery--clinical significance and applicability

Advanced strategies in reconstructive microsurgery and especially free tissue transfer with advanced microvascular techniques have been routinely applied and continously refined for more than three decades in day-to-day clinical work. Bearing in mind the success rates of more than 95%, the value of these techniques in patient care and comfort (one-step reconstruction of even the most complex tissue defects) cannot be underestimated.

However, anticoagulative protocols and practices are far from general acceptance and – most importantly – lack the benchmark of evidence basis while the reconstructive and microsurgical methods are mostly standardized.

Therefore, the aim of our work was to review the actual literature and synoptically lay out the mechanisms of action of the plethora of anticoagulative substances.

The pharmacologic prevention and the surgical intervention of thrombembolic events represent an established and essential part of microsurgery. The high success rates of microvascular free tissue transfer as of today are due to treatment of patients in reconstructive centers where proper patient selection, excellent microsurgical technique, tissue transfer to adequate recipient vessels, and early anastomotic revision in case of thrombosis is provided. Whether the choice of antithrombotic agents is a factor of success remains still unclear. Undoubtedly however the lack of microsurgical experience and bad technique can never be compensated by any regimen of antithrombotic therapy. All the more, the development of consistent standards and algorithms in reconstructive microsurgery is absolutely essential to optimize clinical outcomes and increase multicentric and international comparability of postoperative results and complications.

Lepirudin in the management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Lepirudin, a recombinant hirudin, is a direct irreversible thrombin inhibitor by binding to both free and clot-bound thrombin. It is approved for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is a serious antibody-mediated drug reaction mostly associated with the use of unfractionated heparin. Clinical experience during the last 10 years has proved the efficacy of lepirudin in the management of HIT. The major route of elimination of lepirudin is the kidney, accounting for approximately 90% of its systemic clearance. The most important adverse reactions are bleeding and the induction of immunologic reactions. The risk of bleeding can be reduced by implementing an optimal monitoring and dose adjustment strategy, particularly in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery and in those with impaired renal function. Development of antihirudin antibodies may enhance the anticoagulant effect of lepirudin. Anaphylactic reactions associated with lepirudin therapy are rare. The lack of an antidote against lepirudin is still a concern, particularly during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery with a heart-lung machine and during artificial renal support. Currently, hemofiltration using high-flux filter systems is the only available and valid means to manage hirudin overdose. Nevertheless, the drug can be safely used if meticulous monitoring strategy is installed.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a uremic patient requiring hemodialysis: an alternative treatment and reexposure to heparin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an uncommon but potentially serious complication of hemodialysis, and subsequent reexposure to heparin after the disappearance of antiheparin-PF4 complex antibodies (HIT antibody) has been controversial. We report a 60-year-old woman who was sensitized to unfractionated heparin (heparin) as anticoagulant during hemodialysis (HD) and heparin flush on a nonsession day. The patient suddenly developed acute systemic reactions with acute pulmonary embolism a few minutes after manipulation with heparin flush on day 9, a nonsession day. Although there was no evidence of pulmonary embolism on a pulmonary scintigram on the next day, the fifth HD session was discontinued owing to recurrence of acute systemic reactions and massive clots in the dialyzer 30 min into the session. After confirmation of the presence of HIT antibody and maturation of vascular access fistula, a sixth HD session was carried out with argatroban, a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor, with a bolus of 10 mg and continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/kg/hr as an alternative to heparin. Optimal dose adjustment of argatroban through activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) monitoring led to a bolus of 5 mg and continuous infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/hr. The patient's HD treatment at the same doses 3 times a week followed an uneventful course over 6 months. HIT antibody was seronegative about 40 days after the cessation of heparin treatment. Reexposure to heparin was attempted with the monitoring of HIT antibody and platelet counts before and after the sessions on day 210. The titers of HIT antibody compared with before the level of reexposure showed a transient insignificantly small peak, and dialysis with heparin has been maintained to date with no recurrence of HIT. The measurement of HIT antibody titer could be useful in assessing not only the effect of argatroban to replace heparin but also in predicting the recurrence of HIT due to reexposure.

HEMATOLOGY: ISSUES IN THE DIALYSIS PATIENT: The Safety of Heparins in End-Stage Renal Disease

In patients on chronic dialysis, unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the most commonly used agent for anticoagulation of the hemodialysis extracorporeal circuit, for hemodialysis catheter "locking" between dialysis treatments, and for nondialysis indications such as venous thromboembolic disease, peripheral vascular disease, and acute coronary artery disease. Potentially serious complications of UFH, such as hemorrhage, osteoporosis, and thrombocytopenia, have led to consideration of other options for anticoagulation, including low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). LMWH can be used for anticoagulation of the hemodialysis circuit, but whether this has significant benefit compared to UFH remains to be proven. Because of the somewhat unpredictable risk of severe bleeding complications when LMWH is used for other indications in dialysis patients, UFH rather than LMWH is preferred for treatment of thromboembolic disease in these patients. DTIs have been used for anticoagulation in dialysis patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), with argatroban being the preferred agent if heparin-free hemodialysis cannot be performed. UFH still remains the preferred anticoagulant in the vast majority of dialysis patients requiring systemic anticoagulation and for anticoagulation of the extracorporeal hemodialysis circuit.

HEMATOLOGY: ISSUES IN THE DIALYSIS PATIENT: When Heparin Causes Thrombosis: Significance, Recognition, and Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Dialysis Patients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is characterized by thrombocytopenia and paradoxical hypercoagulability. HIT occurs when an antibody ("HIT antibody") produced against the complex of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4) causes systemic platelet consumption and activation. Nephrologists encounter HIT in the care of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients because heparin is a routine anticoagulant in hemodialysis. The incidence of HIT in ESRD appears to be lower than in other clinical settings. However, HIT is equally life threatening in ESRD patients and therefore demands the same prompt recognition and aggressive treatment. Diagnosing HIT requires the detection of HIT antibodies. A functional assay (e.g., [(14)C] serotonin release assay) relies on the patient's HIT antibodies to activate donor platelets at pharmacologic heparin concentrations. The more common antigen assay (e.g., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) detects the binding of the patient's HIT antibodies to antigens (e.g., heparin-PF4 complex) in a microtiter well and does not involve platelets. The moment HIT is suspected, heparin should be stopped and an alternative anticoagulant initiated immediately, even before the result of a serologic test becomes available. The advent of several new anticoagulants in the last decade, especially argatroban and bivalirudin, has expanded treatment options for HIT in dialysis patients. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of HIT, with special emphasis on concepts relevant to the care of dialysis patients.

Anticoagulant efficacy of PEG-Hirudin in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Heparins are currently the anticoagulants of choice in long-term hemodialysis (HD). Because of their shortcomings, including the increasing incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT II), alternative anticoagulation is necessary. The study objectives were to provide safe and effective HD by investigating an appropriate PEG (polyethylene glycol)-Hirudin dosage regimen in patients on HD, as well as to compare the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of PEG-Hirudin with that of unfractionated heparin (UFH).

METHODS

Twenty patients (12 males, 8 females, mean age 57.8 years) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) took part in the study. Dialysis sessions lasting a mean of 4.3 hours (QB 250 to 300 mL/min, QD 500 mL/min) were performed 3 times a week with a Gambro GFS plus 16 dialyzer. Ten patients (group I) received UFH at 3 regular dialysis sessions (HD1-3) followed by 5 dialysis sessions using PEG-Hirudin (HD4-8). Another 10 patients (group II) received UFH at 3 regular dialysis sessions (HD1-3) followed by 10 sessions on PEG-Hirudin (HD4-13). The starting dose of PEG-Hirudin was a single bolus injection of 80 microg/kg BW (HD4), except for the first patient, who received 50 microg/kg BW followed by a 12 microg/kg bolus. Before each of the following sessions (HD5-13), an individualized PEG-Hirudin dose of between 26 to 65 microg/kg body weight (BW) (mean dose 41 microg/kg BW) was injected. PEG-Hirudin plasma and blood concentrations derived from anti-Iia activity and ecarin clotting time (ECT), respectively, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), bleeding time, and arteriovenous (AV) fistula compression time were investigated to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters or to assess anticoagulant efficacy.

RESULTS

Mean predialysis PEG-Hirudin plasma concentrations increased up to a maximum of 488 ng/mL in group I (HD8) and up to 536 ng/mL in group II (HD8). Mean plasma concentrations measured at 5 minutes after the 1st (HD4), 5th (HD8), and 10th (HD13) PEG-Hirudin injection ranged from 1076 to 1298 ng/mL. Mean post-dialysis plasma levels ranged from 818 to 995 ng/mL. Mean predialysis aPTT was not affected by UFH, but was prolonged by 46 to 56 seconds by PEG-Hirudin. Five minutes after injecting PEG-Hirudin or UFH, mean aPTT was prolonged to a maximum of 85 and 188 seconds, respectively. Mean post-dialysis aPTT values ranged from 60 to 68 seconds after PEG-Hirudin and 34 to 46 seconds after UFH. PEG-Hirudin was well tolerated; no serious adverse events or bleeding complications were observed. Safety assessments yielded no significant difference between the two anticoagulants.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study confirmed the usefulness and tolerability of a PEG-Hirudin dose regimen consisting of a single, fixed bolus dose of 80 microg/kg BW injected before starting the first dialysis session (HD4) and followed by a dose titration period over at least 4 sessions (HD5-8), which again was followed by a fixed maintenance dose period (HD9-13). On the basis of PEG-Hirudin data from patients with various degrees of renal insufficiency but not undergoing hemodialysis and prior recombinant-hirudin (r-hirudin) experience, patients were titrated into an EC-controlled dose range that proved to be efficacious enough to prevent clotting and safe enough to prevent bleeding. Due to the favorable pharmacokinetic properties of PEG-Hirudin, a residual anticoagulant effect is maintained in the intervals between dialysis sessions, and this permanent state of anticoagulation may prevent vascular access complications as well as other vascular events.

Drugs for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Most patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a serious adverse effect of heparin mediated by platelet-activating heparin-dependent antibodies, require alternative anticoagulation. This is because HIT is highly prothrombotic and is characterized by markedly increased thrombin generation. Unfractionated heparins seem to induce HIT more often than low molecular weight heparins. There are three anticoagulants for which there is an emerging consensus for their efficacy in management of HIT, and which are currently approved for treatment of HIT in several countries: the recombinant hirudin, lepirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor; the synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor, argatroban; and the heparinoid, danaparoid sodium, mainly exhibiting antifactor-Xa activity. Recommendations for optimal use of these drugs in HIT are given in this review stressing the need for immediate treatment of patients with HIT without awaiting laboratory diagnosis. Hirudin, the drug for which most data from prospective trials exists, can be safely and effectively used in patients with HIT, its dramatically increased elimination half-life in patients with renal failure being the most important drawback. Argatroban, which is mainly eliminated by the liver, could be used preferentially in such patients with renal impairment. Interference with the international normalized ratio makes oral anticoagulation, which is necessary in many patients with HIT, problematic. Activated partial thromboplastin time is sufficient to monitor lepirudin and argatroban treatment in most cases. Danaparoid sodium, with an antifactor-X activity half-life of about 24 hours seems to be best suited for thrombosis prophylaxis in patients with HIT. In some patients monitoring by determining antifactor-Xa activity is necessary. No antidote is available for any of the drugs discussed, and bleeding complications are the most important adverse effects. In situations such as hemodialysis or cardiopulmonary bypass, not only the characteristics of the drug in use itself, but also availability of monitoring methods play an important role. Adjunctive treatments have not been systematically evaluated and should be used cautiously. Recent data suggest that re-exposure of patients with a history of HIT with heparin, for example during cardiopulmonary bypass, can be well tolerated provided no circulating HIT antibodies are detectable at the time of re-exposure, and heparin is strictly avoided pre- and postoperatively.

The Role of Recombinant Hirudins in the Management of Thrombotic Disorders

Native hirudin is the most potent natural direct thrombin inhibitor currently known; it is capable of inhibiting not only fluid phase, but also clot-bound thrombin. Recombinant technology now allows production of recombinant hirudins (r-hirudins), which are available in sufficient purity and quantity with essentially unaltered thrombin-inhibitory potency. As thrombin is known to play a key role in a number of thrombotic disorders, numerous studies focused on the impact of r-hirudins on the clinical course in these diseases. R-hirudins provided significantly more stable anticoagulation than standard heparin, but demonstrated a relatively narrow therapeutic range with relevant bleeding risk even at clinically effective doses. In doses that are not associated with an increased bleeding risk, r-hirudins often failed to demonstrate significant superiority to heparin. To date, r-hirudins have a definite role in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, where they markedly reduce the high risk of thrombosis. For prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis, r-hirudins have been shown to be superior to both unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin, but are not extensively used in this indication. In acute coronary syndromes, a definite role of r-hirudins has not yet been firmly established. When applied in an appropriate dose as adjunct to thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction, randomized, controlled trials did not show a consistent benefit of r-hirudins, especially in the long-term. In patients undergoing coronary balloon angioplasty for acute coronary syndromes, promising effects in the early postprocedural phase did not translate to an improved outcome after 6 months. In patients with unstable angina pectoris, efficacy and safety of r-hirudins as primary antithrombotic therapy are still under debate. In the future, r-hirudins are to be compared with alternative or additional potent antithrombotic agents or treatment strategies. This comparison will ultimately lead to their final placement in the management of thrombotic disorders.

Removal of lepirudin, a recombinant hirudin, by hemodialysis, hemofiltration, or plasmapheresis

Lepirudin (recombinant hirudin), a direct thrombin inhibitor, is an effective alternative method of anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. However, because it is eliminated by the kidneys, the half-life of lepirudin may be substantially prolonged in patients with renal failure. Patients undergoing hemodialysis must be closely monitored, and therapy must be individualized based on each patient's ability to clear the drug. Current literature on the removal of lepirudin by dialysis or plasmapheresis is limited, but available data suggest that lepirudin can be removed with these methods. The ability of filtration systems to remove lepirudin from the blood is highly dependent on the membrane material used in the system. Understanding the effects of hemodialysis, hemofiltration, and plasmapheresis on lepirudin levels is important, especially since no antidote is available to treat elevated serum lepirudin concentrations.

Use of lepirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and renal failure requiring hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

To report two cases of successful lepirudin use in two patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and renal failure.

CASE SUMMARY

Two patients with renal failure requiring hemodialysis developed HIT syndrome during intravenous heparin therapy. Anticoagulation was necessary to prevent recurrent, acute venous thrombosis in one patient and to prevent arterial thrombosis associated with the use of an intraaortic balloon pump in the second. Intravenous lepirudin was initiated at doses of 0.01 mg/kg/h and 0.005 mg/kg/h, respectively, and titrated based on the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Steady-state doses were 0.015 mg/kg/h to maintain aPTT values of approximately 60 seconds in one patient, and 0.005-0.008 mg/kg/h to achieve an aPTT of approximately 45 seconds in the other patient.

DISCUSSION

Lepirudin is one of few anticoagulants that can be safely used in patients with HIT. Because it is eliminated through the kidneys, great care must be taken when administering lepirudin to patients with renal failure; in fact, its use is currently not recommended in patients requiring hemodialysis. Lepirudin effectively prevented acute thrombosis in both of our patients with documented HIT, with no bleeding complications. We describe how we selected the initial doses and report results of aPTT monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with renal failure who develop HIT, lepirudin is one available alternative to heparin despite its poor renal elimination pattern and subsequently prolonged half-life.

Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia

Treatment with heparin is associated with two types of thrombocytopenia. The most worrisome of these is the immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type II). Suspicion of HIT type II mandates immediate cessation of heparin administration and consideration of an alternative anticoagulation therapy. Hirudin and argatroban are approved alternative anticoagulants with no cross-reactivity with the HIT antibody. HIT type II is a clinicopathologic syndrome, and therefore diagnosis requires clinical and laboratory confirmation. The laboratory evaluation for HIT type II should also determine whether or not there is HIT-antibody cross-reactivity with danaparoid and low molecular weight heparin. Patients with HIT type II who require coronary artery bypass graft surgery present a particularly difficult situation, as there is no ideal alternative to heparin anticoagulation.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycol-hirudin in patients with chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

Hirudin selectively inhibits thrombin without cofactors and is eliminated via the kidneys. Recombinant hirudin (r-hi) has a terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of about 50 to 100 minutes. Coupling of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to r-hi, giving PEG-hirudin (PEG-Hi), prolongs its t1/2 while enhancing efficacy. We looked at the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic behavior of PEG-Hi in patients with impaired renal function.

METHODS

Anticoagulant activity and the pharmacokinetic parameters of a single intravenous bolus injection of 0.05 mg/kg body weight PEG-Hi were studied in 38 subjects. They were assigned to five groups: group IA, creatinine clearance (CCr) >/= 80 mL/min, 8 healthy volunteers; group IB, CCr >/= 80 mL/min, 8 patients with normal renal function); group II, CCr 79 to 50 mL/min, 7 patients with mild chronic renal failure (CRF); group III, CCr 49 to 20 mL/min, 10 patients with moderate CRF; and group IV, CCr </= 19 mL/min, 5 patients with severe CRF. Plasma and urine samples were collected from patients for up to 120 hours after dosing and from healthy volunteers for up to 24 hours.

RESULTS

PEG-Hi was well tolerated in all groups. No serious adverse events were noted. Cmax values were similar in all groups; area under the curve (AUC) increased in patients from 2.9 +/- 1.0 microg. h/mL (IB) to 21.3 +/- 5.0 microg h/mL (IV). According to the severity of renal function, t1/2 was prolonged from 2 hours (IB) to 38.4 hours (IV), while total body clearance (CTB), renal clearance (CRenal), and recovery of PEG-Hi in the urine (FEo-t) decreased as follows: CTB from 23.3 +/- 6.6 (IB) to 2.9 +/- 0.6 mL/min (IV), CRenal from 7.8 +/- 5.0 (IB) to 0.8 +/- 0.5 mL/min (IV), and FEo-t from 40.2 +/- 18. 9% (IB) to 12.6 +/- 13.0% (IV). Total plasma clearance of PEG-Hi was well correlated with CCr. Anti-IIa activity of PEG-Hi showed a closer linear relationship to ecarin clotting time than to activated partial thromboplastin time.

CONCLUSION

Hence, PEG-Hi is considered safe in patients with CRF, but dosing and/or dose intervals should be adjusted according to the severity of renal impairment. Ecarin clotting time is well suited for safe and reliable monitoring of PEG-Hi.