A Comparative Study of the Duration and Efficacy of Tetracaine 1% and Bupivacaine 0.75% in Controlling Pain following Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)

Use of Topical Anesthetics in the Management of Patients With Simple Corneal Abrasions: Consensus Guidelines From the American College of Emergency Physicians

The management of corneal abrasions has largely excluded dispensing topical local anesthetics for home use due to concern for corneal toxicity. We have reviewed and critically appraised the available literature evidence regarding the use of topical anesthetics in patients with simple corneal abrasions. Using sequential Delphi review, we have developed these clinical guidelines. Herein are evidentiary summaries and consensus recommendations for 8 specific relevant questions. Our key observation is that for only simple corneal abrasions, as diagnosed and treated in accordance with the full protocol described herein, it appears safe to prescribe or otherwise provide a commercial topical anesthetic (ie, proparacaine, tetracaine, oxybuprocaine) for use up to every 30 minutes as needed during the first 24 hours after presentation, as long as no more than 1.5 to 2 mL total (an expected 24-hour supply) is dispensed and any remainder is discarded after 24 hours. Importantly, although published findings suggest absent harm for short courses, more rigorous studies with a greater cumulative sample size and ophthalmologic follow-up are needed.

Preservative-Free Topical Anesthetic Unit-Dose Eye Drops for the Management of Postoperative Pain Following Photorefractive Keratectomy

INTRODUCTION

Ocular pain is a common complication following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). The level of patient satisfaction with current pain control strategies is not high. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel regimen of preservative-free oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4% unit-dose eye drops for post-PRK pain control.

METHODS

In a contralateral eye study, 144 eyes of 72 patients who underwent bilateral transepithelial PRK (TransPRK) were stratified into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received preservative-free oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4% unit-dose eye drops five times daily postoperatively until complete epithelial healing, while the control group received sodium hyaluronate 0.2% instead. The main outcome measures were pain scores assessed by the verbal rating scale and visual analogue scale (VRS, VAS), the corneal epithelial defect (CED) area, epithelial healing duration evaluated by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) measured before and 1 month after surgery.

RESULTS

Pain scores assessed by VRS and VAS were significantly lower in the experimental group 8 h after surgery, and 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively (P < 0.001). The mean CED area showed no significant differences between the two groups at different follow-ups (P value > 0.05). The corneal epithelial healing had a mean duration of 3.32 ± 0.47 days in both studied groups and was parallel in both eyes of each patient. In each group, 49 eyes (68%) and 72 eyes (100%) had a fully epithelialized surface on the third and fourth postoperative days, respectively. No significant changes were observed in the mean ECD 1 month following surgery in both groups (P value > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preservative-free oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4% unit-dose eye drops are effective and safe in controlling early postoperative pain following TransPRK. The availability of the single-dose unit preparation can overcome the problem of topical anesthetic abuse.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05733741.

Topical ophthalmic anesthetics for corneal abrasions

BACKGROUND

Despite potential analgesic benefits from topical ophthalmic amides and esters, their outpatient use has become of concern because of the potential for abuse and ophthalmic complications.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of topical ophthalmic anesthetics compared with placebo or other treatments in persons with corneal abrasions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; Embase.com; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), without restriction on language or year of publication. The search was performed on 10 February 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of topical ophthalmic anesthetics alone or in combination with another treatment (e.g. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)) versus a non-anesthetic control group (e.g. placebo, non-treatment, or alternative treatment). We included trials that enrolled participants of all ages who had corneal abrasions within 48 hours of presentation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine parallel-group RCTs with a total of 556 participants (median number of participants per study: 45, interquartile range (IQR) 44 to 74), conducted in eight countries: Australia, Canada, France, South Korea, Turkey, New Zealand, UK, and USA. Study characteristics and risk of bias Four RCTs (314 participants) investigated post-traumatic corneal abrasions diagnosed in the emergency department setting. Five trials described 242 participants from ophthalmology surgery centers with post-surgical corneal defects: four from photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and one from pterygium surgery. Study duration ranged from two days to six months, the most common being one week (four RCTs). Treatment duration ranged from three hours to one week (nine RCTs); the majority were between 24 and 48 hours (five RCTs). The age of participants was reported in eight studies, ranging from 17 to 74 years of age. Only one participant in one trial was under 18 years of age. Of four studies that reported funding sources, none was industry-sponsored. We judged a high risk of bias in one trial with respect to the outcome pain control by 48 hours, and in five of seven trials with respect to the outcome complications at the furthest time point. The domain for which we assessed studies to be at the highest risk of bias was missing or selective reporting of outcome data. Findings The treatments investigated included topical anesthetics compared with placebo, topical anesthetic compared with NSAID (post-surgical cases), and topical anesthetics plus NSAID compared with placebo (post-surgical cases). Pain control by 24 hours In all studies, self-reported pain outcomes were on a 10-point scale, where lower numbers represent less pain. In post-surgical trials, topical anesthetics provided a moderate reduction in self-reported pain at 24 hours compared with placebo of 1.28 points on a 10-point scale (mean difference (MD) -1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.76 to -0.80; 3 RCTs, 119 participants). In the post-trauma participants, there may be little or no difference in effect (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.02; 1 RCT, 76 participants). Compared with NSAID in post-surgical participants, topical anesthetics resulted in a slight increase in pain at 24 hours (MD 0.82, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.63; 1 RCT, 74 participants). One RCT compared topical anesthetics plus NSAID to placebo. There may be a large reduction in pain at 24 hours with topical anesthetics plus NSAID in post-surgical participants, but the evidence to support this large effect is very uncertain (MD -5.72, 95% CI -7.35 to -4.09; 1 RCT, 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Pain control by 48 hours Compared with placebo, topical anesthetics reduced post-trauma pain substantially by 48 hours (MD -5.68, 95% CI -6.38 to -4.98; 1 RCT, 111 participants) but had little to no effect on post-surgical pain (MD 0.41, 95% CI -0.45 to 1.27; 1 RCT, 44 participants), although the evidence is very uncertain. Pain control by 72 hours One post-surgical RCT showed little or no effect of topical anesthetics compared with placebo by 72 hours (MD 0.49, 95% CI -0.06 to 1.04; 44 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Proportion of participants with unresolved epithelial defects When compared with placebo or NSAID, topical anesthetics increased the number of participants without complete resolution of defects in trials of post-trauma participants (risk ratio (RR) 1.37, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.42; 3 RCTs, 221 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The proportion of placebo-treated post-surgical participants with unresolved epithelial defects at 24 to 72 hours was lower when compared with those assigned to topical anesthetics (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.55; 1 RCT, 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or topical anesthetics plus NSAID (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.85; 1 RCT, 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Proportion of participants with complications at the longest follow-up When compared with placebo or NSAID, topical anesthetics resulted in a higher proportion of post-trauma participants with complications at up to two weeks (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.23 to 5.46; 3 RCTs, 242 participants) and post-surgical participants with complications at up to one week (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.38 to 128.02; 1 RCT, 44 participants). When topical anesthetic plus NSAID was compared with placebo, no complications were reported in either treatment arm up to one week post-surgery (risk difference (RD) 0.00, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.12; 1 RCT, 30 participants). The evidence is very uncertain for safety outcomes. Quality of life None of the included trials assessed quality of life outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite topical anesthetics providing excellent pain control in the intraoperative setting, the currently available evidence provides little or no certainty about their efficacy for reducing ocular pain in the initial 24 to 72 hours after a corneal abrasion, whether from unintentional trauma or surgery. We have very low confidence in this evidence as a basis to recommend topical anesthetics as an efficacious treatment modality to relieve pain from corneal abrasions. We also found no evidence of a substantial effect on epithelial healing up to 72 hours or a reduction in ocular complications when we compared anesthetics alone or with NSAIDs versus placebo.

Management of Pain after Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate current best practices for postoperative photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) pain control.

METHODS

Literature searches in the PubMed database were last conducted in October 2021 and were restricted to publications in English. This search identified 219 citations, of which 84 were reviewed in full text for their relevance to the scope of this assessment. Fifty-one articles met the criteria for inclusion; 16 studies were rated level I, 33 studies were rated level II, and 2 studies were rated level III.

RESULTS

Systemic opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); topical NSAIDs; postoperative cold patches; bandage soft contact lenses (BCLs), notably senofilcon A contact lenses; and topical anesthetics were demonstrated to offer significantly better pain control than comparison treatments. Some other commonly reported pain mitigation interventions such as systemic gabapentinoids, chilled intraoperative balanced salt solution (BSS) irrigation, cycloplegia, and specific surface ablation technique strategies offered limited improvement in pain control over control treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic NSAIDs and opioid medications, topical NSAIDs, cold patches, BCLs, and topical anesthetics have been shown to provide improved pain control over alternative strategies and allow PRK-associated pain to be more tolerable for patients.

Update on Pain Management After Advanced Surface Ablation

PURPOSE

To provide an update for postoperative pain control strategies to help ophthalmic surgeons establish a more effective management plan for patients who underwent advanced surface ablation surgeries.

METHODS

Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PubMed were the main resources used to search the medical literature.

RESULTS

The postoperative cornea's healing process is accompanied by intense pain as the chief complaint in the first days after the operation. Several strategies were developed to relieve postoperative pain after surface ablation procedures. These strategies included different preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative methods. Considering the preoperative demographic and emotional factors, underlying dry eye, alternative epithelial removal techniques, bandage contact lenses, and topical or oral therapeutic agents are some examples of postoperative pain treatments after surface ablation procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The current review revealed that despite the development of numerous protocols to relieve postoperative pain following surface ablations, the best approach could be a combination of different strategies. In practice, no validated and standardized strategy is available for total elimination of postoperative pain following advanced surface ablation surgeries. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(11):782-790.].

Short-Term Topical Tetracaine Is Highly Efficacious for the Treatment of Pain Caused by Corneal Abrasions: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to show that patients with corneal abrasions would experience more pain relief with short-term topical tetracaine than placebo.

METHODS

The study was a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of tetracaine versus placebo set in the emergency department (ED). A total of 118 adults who presented with uncomplicated corneal abrasions were included and randomized. The intervention was either topical tetracaine or placebo applied every 30 minutes as needed for 24 hours. The primary outcome was the overall numeric rating scale pain score measured at the 24- to 48-hour ED follow-up examination.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven patients were included in the final analysis, 56 in the tetracaine group and 55 in the placebo group. At the 24- to 48-hour follow-up, the overall numeric rating scale pain score after use of the study drops was significantly lower in the tetracaine group (1) versus placebo group (8) (Δ7; 95% confidence interval 6 to 8). Patients in the tetracaine group used less hydrocodone than those in the placebo group. The complication rates between the 2 groups were similar.

CONCLUSION

Short-term topical tetracaine is an efficacious analgesic for acute corneal abrasions, is associated with less hydrocodone use compared with placebo, and was found to be safe in this sample.

Assessment of Factors Associated With Postoperative Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE

To define the factors that affect patient's self-assessed postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

Patients who underwent PRK in 2016 were evaluated. Anonymized data collected included patient gender, age, and season at the time of surgery, ablation depth, surgeon status (attending vs. resident), topical tetracaine use, and subjective pain scores at postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 7. Average pain scores and amount of pain medication taken were analyzed for each of the previously mentioned variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 231 patients who underwent PRK were analyzed. The mean pain score and SD were 0.78 ± 1.87 on POD 1 and 0.03 ± 0.37 by POD 7. Patients who used topical tetracaine reported significantly higher pain on POD 1 and 7 compared with patients who did not use tetracaine (P < 0.001 and P = 0.038, respectively). No significant differences in pain scores were seen based on surgeon status, ablation depth, gender, and season. Patients who used topical tetracaine took a higher amount of oral pain medication (9.44 ± 6.01) compared with those who did not (7.02 ± 4.71) (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pain was significantly elevated in patients who used tetracaine on POD 1 and POD 7. These patients were also more likely to take oral pain medication than those who did not use topical tetracaine. Surgeon status, season, gender, and ablation depth showed no significant differences in subjective pain scores. Oral pain medication should be evaluated to assess efficacy and safety in inhibiting ocular pain after PRK.

Emergency medicine myths and misconceptions: evaluating the evidence

Medical reversal is common, with rates of reversal of practices that were considered standard of care as high as 40%. Unfortunately, many standards of care are never tested, but instead are often promoted based on pathophysiological explanations or simply being long-established practices. Much of medical practice is based on dogma: a set of principles laid down by authority as incontrovertibly true. This article evaluates four commonly taught dogmatic practices in emergency medicine to determine if they are supported by the medical literature or are instead myths and misconceptions: (1) topical anaesthetics inhibit corneal healing, (2) treatment of myocardial infarction is MONA (morphine, oxygen, nitrates, aspirin), (3) children do not get sprains because their ligaments are stronger than bone, and (4) vagal manoeuvres for supraventricular tachycardia never work in adults. Medicine is changing all the time, and the best way to ensure that one is practicing medicine that is accurate, up to date and not prone to being reversed is to always be sceptical and to learn how to read and interpret the medical literature.

Perioperative Corneal Abrasion: Updated Guidelines for Prevention and Management

Corneal abrasion is the most common ocular complication in surgery. Treatment requires pain control, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and close monitoring. Pain improves significantly after 24 hours and should be resolved by 48 hours. Persistent, worsening, or new symptoms warrant immediate specialist consultation. The authors review the pathophysiology of perioperative corneal abrasion, and propose updated evidence-based guidelines for improved patient care.

Comparison of the effect of cycloplegic versus NSAID eye drops on pain after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of Homatropine and Diclofenac eye drops for reducing pain after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

This randomized, double-masked, interventional study included 32 patients (64 eyes) who underwent bilateral PRK. After operation, patients received Homatropine eye drops in one eye and Diclofenac eye drops in the fellow eye for 48 h. The level of pain was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS), and pain rating index (PRI) at 0.5, 24, and 48 h after operation.

RESULTS

The level of pain was statistically similar between the two eyes half an hour after operation; however, Diclofenac eyes had significantly less pain 24 h after operation (1.7 ± 1.4 vs 5.8 ± 2.1, P < 0.001 for VAS, 0.6 ± 0.6 vs 2.4 ± 1.1, P < 0.001 for VRS, and 3.4 ± 3.4 vs 12.0 ± 6.9, P < 0.001 for PRI, respectively). Also, 48 h after surgery, the pain scores were less in the Diclofenac eyes (1.6 ± 1.8 vs 3.4 ± 2.8, P < 0.001 for VAS, 0.6 ± 0.6 vs 1.2 ± 0.9, P < 0.001 for VRS, and 3.3 ± 3.7 vs 6.5 ± 6.2, P < 0.001 for PRI). No case with delayed epithelial healing in both groups was observed.

CONCLUSION

The effect of Homatropine seems to be lower compared to Diclofenac for reducing pain after photorefractive keratectomy.

Efficacy and safety of pain relief medications after photorefractive keratectomy: review of prospective randomized trials

The objective of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview and comparison of results from all prospective randomized trials published to date of medications used to treat pain after photorefrative keratectomy (PRK). A PubMed database search revealed 23 prospective and randomized studies. They included the following classes of medications: nonsteroidal antiimflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anesthetics, opiates, acetaminophen, gabapentin, and pregabalin. The studies found that although the efficacy of drugs tended to be similar, tetracaine 1% and nepafenac 0.1% tended to have the most analgesic effect. Delayed corneal reepithelialization was a common side effect of both topical anesthetics and topical NSAIDs. Tetracaine 1% resulted in the most significant delay in reepithelialization when tested against placebo control compared with other topical medications tested against placebo. Concomitant use of topical NSAIDs and topical anesthetics, especially tetracaine, may have to be avoided to minimize the risk for delayed corneal healing.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Genomics of corneal wound healing: a review of the literature

Corneal wound healing is a complex process: its mechanisms and the underlying genetic control are not fully understood. It involves the integrated actions of multiple growth factors, cytokines and proteases produced by epithelial cells, stromal keratocytes, inflammatory cells and lacrimal gland cells. Following an epithelial insult, multiple cytokines are released triggering a cascade of events that leads to repair the epithelial defect and remodelling of the stroma to minimize the loss of transparency and function. In this review, we examine the literature surrounding the genomics of corneal wound healing with respect to the following topics: epithelial and stromal wound healing (including inhibition); corneal neovascularisation; the role of corneal nerves in wound healing; the endothelium; the role of aquaporins and aptamers. We also examine the effect of ectasia on corneal wound healing with regard to keratoconus and following corneal surgery. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular changes that occur during repair of corneal wounds will provide the opportunity to design treatments that selectively modulate key phases of the healing process resulting in scars that more closely resemble normal corneal architecture.

Topical tetracaine used for 24 hours is safe and rated highly effective by patients for the treatment of pain caused by corneal abrasions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that topical tetracaine would be safe to use for 24 hours and would not affect corneal healing, that patients would experience more pain relief, and that patients would perceive tetracaine to be more effective than saline eye drops for the treatment of pain caused by corneal abrasions.

METHODS

The study was a 12-month, prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of tetracaine versus saline set in the emergency department (ED) of a regional tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 116 patients presenting with uncomplicated corneal abrasions were included in this study. The intervention was either undiluted, preservative-free, topical tetracaine hydrochloride 1% or saline, applied up to every 30 minutes while awake for 24 hours. Main safety outcome measures were repeat ED examinations at 48 hours with fluorescein staining and slit-lamp examination, 1-week and 1-month telephone interviews with additional examinations as needed, and monitoring of charts for complications. Secondary outcome measures were 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores recorded every 2 hours while awake for 48 hours and patient-perceived overall effectiveness using a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 obtained during telephone interviews.

RESULTS

At least one follow-up encounter was completed on each of the 116 patients. No complications specifically attributed to topical anesthetic use occurred in the 59 patients in the tetracaine group, and the binomial probability confidence interval (CI) of this occurring is 0 to 6.1. There was no significant difference in corneal healing as measured by the percentage of patients with persistent fluorescein uptake at 48 hours between the two groups (23.9% vs. 21.3%, difference=2.6%, 95% CI=-14% to 20%, p=0.761) or persistent symptoms at 48 hours (21.7% vs. 21.3%, difference=0.4%, 95% CI=-16% to 17%, p=0.957). There was no clinical difference in VAS pain scores between the groups. Patients in the tetracaine group rated the study drugs' overall effectiveness significantly higher on the NRS (7.7 vs. 3.9) compared to patients in the saline group (difference=3.9, 95% CI=2.4 to 5.3, p<0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Topical tetracaine used for 24 hours is safe, and while there was no significant difference in patient VAS pain ratings over time, patient surveys on overall effectiveness showed that patients perceived tetracaine to be significantly more effective than saline.

New method of microwave thermokeratoplasty to correct myopia in 33 eyes: one-year results

PURPOSE

To assess the safety, predictability, and stability of a new microwave thermokeratoplasty procedure to correct myopia.

SETTING

Cornea and refractive surgery subspecialty.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial.

METHOD

Thermokeratoplasty was performed in myopic eyes at a single center in Turkey from June 2009 to June 2010. The attempted corrections ranged from -1.25 to -5.75 diopters (D). The main outcome measures were changes in logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and in keratometry (K) values.

RESULTS

The procedure was performed in 33 eyes (patients aged 20 to 45 years). The mean preoperative logMAR UDVA (0.76 ± 0.24 [SD]) significantly improved to 0.19 ± 0.20 at 1 month, postoperatively. By 3 months, the mean UDVA had markedly regressed to 0.59 ± 0.29; however, the residual improvement remained statistically significant. At 12 months, the mean logMAR UDVA was 0.72 ± 0.26. The mean K values were 43.9 ± 1.36 D preoperatively, 41.25 ± 2.63 D at 1 month, 43.4 ± 1.69 D at 3 months, and 44.1 ± 1.09 D at 12 months. The mean endothelial cell density was 2836 ± 342 cells/mm(2) preoperatively and were statistically unchanged 12 months postoperatively (2732 ± 353 cell/mm(2)). No patient lost lines of corrected distance visual acuity by 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The new thermokeratoplasty procedure produced the desired reduction in myopia and improvement in postoperative UDVA 1 month postoperatively without significant side effects. However, early and complete regression shows the need for further development of this technique.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Drs. Yilmaz and Marshall are paid consultants to Avedro, Inc., and Dr. Muller is president and CEO of Avedro, Inc. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Effect of Homatropine eye drops on pain after photorefractive keratectomy: A pilot study

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of homatropine eye drops on pain after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

This randomized, double masked, interventional study included 15 patients (30 eyes) who underwent bilateral PRK. After operation, patients received homatropine eye drops, 4 times daily in only one eye (homatropine eye). The level of pain was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS) and pain rating index (PRI) at 0.5, 24 and 48 h after operation.

RESULTS

The level of pain was statistically similar between the two eyes half an hour after operation, however, homatropine eyes had significantly less pain 24 h after operation compared to fellow eyes (2.5 ± 1.9 vs 5.3 ± 2.5, P = 0.004 for VAS, 2.0 ± 1.2 vs 3.2 ± 0.9, P = 0.023 for VRS, and 9.4 ± 5.7 vs 16.0 ± 9.0, P = 0.031 for PRI). Also, 48 h after surgery, the pain scales were less in the homatropine eyes (2.3 ± 1.7 vs 4.0 ± 2.1, P = 0.014 for VAS, 1.6 ± 1.0 vs 2.5 ± 1.0, P = 0.038 for VRS, and 6.8 ± 5.7 vs 12.0 ± 8.9, P = 0.005 for PRI). No delayed epithelial healing was observed.

CONCLUSION

Homatropine eye drops may be useful for reducing pain after Photorefractive keratectomy.

Dilute proparacaine for the management of acute corneal injuries in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE

Dogma discourages the provision of topical anesthetics to patients with corneal injuries discharged from the emergency department because of the toxicity of concentrated solutions. We compared the analgesic efficacy of dilute topical proparacaine with placebo in emergency department patients with acute corneal injuries.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of adults with corneal injuries presenting to one of 2 tertiary care emergency departments in London, Ont. Patients were randomly assigned to groups receiving either 0.05% proparacaine or placebo drops as outpatients and were followed up to healing by a single ophthalmologist. Our primary outcome was pain reduction as measured on a 10-cm visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants from the proparacaine group and 18 participants from the placebo group completed the study. The mean age of the patients was 38.7 (standard deviation 12.3) years and the majority were male (85%). Pain reduction was significantly better in the proparacaine group than in the placebo group, with a median improvement of 3.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5-5.1) cm on the visual analog scale versus a median improvement of 0.6 (IQR 0.2-2.0) cm (p = 0.007). The proparacaine group was more satisfied (median level of satisfaction 8.0 [IQR 6.0-9.0] cm on a 10-cm visual analog scale v. 2.6 [IQR 1.0-8.0] cm, p = 0.027). There were no ocular complications or signs of delayed wound healing in either group.

CONCLUSION

Dilute topical proparacaine is an efficacious analgesic for acute corneal injuries. Although no adverse events were observed in our study population, larger studies are required to evaluate safety.

Oral gabapentin for the treatment of postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate oral gabapentin for postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial.

METHODS

In additional to a standard regimen of topical antibiotics, topical steroids, and topical tetracaine as required, all PRK patients at our laser vision center were treated after surgery for pain for a two-month period with Percocet (oxycodone/acetaminophen) [Endo Pharmaceuticals; Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, USA] 5 mg/325 mg as required for three days (control group). Patients completed a pain assessment survey using a faces pain scale (from zero through 6) on the evening of surgery and each subsequent morning and evening until postoperative day 3. A successive cohort of patients received Neurontin (gabapentin) [Pfizer, New York, New York, USA] 300 mg thrice daily (first dose administered two hours or more before the procedure) as an oral pain medication for three days, and the same survey data were collected.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 141 patients in each cohort. Successful pain management score (defined as faces zero through 2 on the scale) differences did not reach statistical significance between the two cohorts except on the morning of the second postoperative day, when gabapentin was superior. On all postoperative days, patients in the oxycodone/acetaminophen cohort used significantly less tetracaine eye drops as required. The percent of patients rating overall pain experience as better than expected was 35% and 36%, those rating pain experience as about what was expected was 50% and 49%, and those rating pain experience as worse than expected was 15% and 15% in the oxycodone/acetaminophen and gabapentin cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no difference in overall subjective pain management ratings between gabapentin and oxycodone/acetaminophen for postoperative PRK pain, although gabapentin was associated with significantly more frequent use of anesthetic eye drops as required.

Efficacy and safety of three ophthalmic inserts for topical anaesthesia of the cornea. An exploratory comparative dose-ranging, double-blind, randomized trial in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Cataract surgery requires prolonged anaesthesia, concomitant with permanent hydration and lubrication of the cornea, in order to provide a clear view of the operation area.

AIMS

The primary objective of the study was to assess several formulae of a soluble ophthalmic insert: TOPICSERT [bupivacaine (Bupi) + hyaluronic acid (HA) or sodium hyaluronate] in terms of complete and long-lasting anaesthesia of the cornea. The hydration properties of HA were not assessed in this study.

METHODS

In a prospective double-blind, cross-over, randomized study, with latin-square allocation of treatments, 16 healthy volunteers received a single dose of each formula (A, 1 mg Bupi and 0.1 mg HA; B, 0.5 mg Bupi and 0.1 mg HA; C, 1 mg Bupi and 0 mg HA, and D acting as a placebo) via the ocular route with 1 week of wash-out between each period. Corneal anaesthesia was measured using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between treatments with regard to the main criterion (complete anaesthesia lasting at least 20 min) when general association statistics were used (Mantel-Haenzel test, P < 0.0001): 68.75% (n = 11) of subjects receiving treatment A, 37.5% (n = 6) receiving treatment B, and 87.5% (n = 14) on treatment C reached complete and satisfactory anaesthesia, while this was not achieved in any of the subjects receiving placebo. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals of the difference between treatments were as follows: treatment A vs. B (-0.03, 0.66), treatment A vs. C (-0.47, 0.10), treatment B vs. C (-0.84, - 0.16). Only the difference between B and C was statistically significant (adjusted probability by the method of Bonferroni, P < 0.001). When complete anaesthesia was reached, mean (+/-SD) duration of anaesthesia was as follows: 20.7 (+/-6.5), 15.3 (+/-11.4) and 24.7 (+/-7.6) min for treatments A, B, C, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Bupivacaine 1 mg seems to be the efficient and safe dose. The value of hyaluronic acid as a corneal hydration agent and used in association with bupivacaine will be the subject of further studies.

A comparative study of post-operative pain in laser epithelial keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy

BACKGROUND

To compare the level of post-operative pain associated with two methods of excimer laser corneal refractive surgery: PRK (photorefractive keratectomy) versus LASEK (laser epithelial keratomileusis).

METHODS

14 patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral myopic PRK were included in the study. The first eye of each patient was randomly allocated for treatment by either LASEK or PRK with alcohol-assisted epithelial debridement and second eyes were treated with the other technique. Laser corneal ablation was performed with Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser by one surgeon (MAA) using the same algorithm. Post-operatively, all patients had declofenac sodium 0.1% eye drops four times a day, lorazepam 2mg at night and two solpadol (paracetamol 500mg and codeine phosphate 30mg) tablets every six hours orally for two days. Chloramphenicol 0.5% drops four times a day were also administered for seven days. The level of pain in each eye was assessed 2, 12, 24 and 48 hours following laser surgery using a descriptive pain score from 0 to 10. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t test.

RESULTS

The mean pain score at two hours post-operatively was 3.5 +/- 2.24(SD) in the LASEK group and 5.7 +/- 2.02(SD) in the PRK group. This difference is statistically significant. At 12 hours it was 4.33 +/- 2.53 (SD) and 4.75 +/- 2.30 (SD), at 24 hours it was 3.71 +/-2.84 (SD) and 4.00 +/- 2.48 (SD), and at 48 hours it was 2.86 +/- 3.43 (SD) and 2.21 +/- 2.55 (SD). There was no statistically significant difference in the pain score at these intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative pain was less in eyes treated with LASEK than eyes treated with PRK 2 hours following laser surgery. This was statisticaly significant and there was no statistically significant difference at 12, 24 and 48 hours.

Growth factors in corneal wound healing following refractive surgery: A review

The first part of this review article aims to provide important basic definitions of growth factor terminology, and to put forward a model for understanding the role of growth factors in a wound healing context. In the second part of the paper, we review the literature on growth factors in the cornea, including that on changes associated with wound healing following refractive surgery in the epithelial, stromal, and endothelial layers. The role of growth factors in stromal removal, corneal neovascularization, corneal innervation and wound healing is considered. The importance of the epithelial-stromal interaction is discussed, including the role of growth factors in keratocyte apoptosis. In the final section, we review the current literature on endogenous and exogenous modulation of growth factors in corneal wound healing. This includes important in vitro work but aims to emphasize clinically relevant results. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) may have short-term complications such as pain and haze, whereas laser in situ keratomilieusis (LASIK) may have longer-term adverse effects on corneal biomechanics. The emerging technique of laser epithelial keratomilieusis (LASEK) provides an interesting alternative wound which may be less susceptible to the inherent complications of PRK and LASIK. At present, the phenomenon of iatrogenic keratectasia following LASIK is not fully understood, but these features of wound healing following PRK may be amenable to growth factor modulation.

Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness, safety, and stability of laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), a modified photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) technique, with those of conventional PRK for low to moderate myopia.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 27 patients with a manifest refraction of -3.00 to -6.50 diopters were treated and followed for 3 months. In each case, PRK was performed in 1 eye and LASEK in the other eye. The first eye treated and the surgical method used in the first eye were randomized. Postoperative pain, epithelial healing time, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, corneal haze, and surgical preference were examined in PRK- and LASEK-treated eyes.

RESULTS

During the 3 month follow-up, there were no significant between-eye differences in epithelial healing time, UCVA, or refractive error. However, LASEK-treated eyes had lower postoperative pain scores (P =.047) and corneal haze scores (1 month; P =.02) than PRK-treated eyes. Seventeen patients (63%) preferred the LASEK procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser epithelial keratomileusis safely and effectively treated eyes with low to moderate myopia. It reduced the incidence of significant postoperative pain and corneal haze and may prevent the flap- and interface-related problems of laser in situ keratomileusis.