Postoperative acetabular component position in revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the anterior and posterior approaches

A systematic review on revision total hip arthroplasty employing the direct anterior approach

INTRODUCTION

The increased use of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has extended to revision THA. This systematic review evaluated studies reporting both the utility and clinical outcomes of revision THA using DAA, focusing on studies comparing revision approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases identified 577 publications. 538 were excluded after abstract screening. Full-text review identified 21 studies with 1627 patients. All studies were retrospective, level IV evidence. MINORS criteria rated 14 as poor and seven as moderate. Five studies compared DAA to alternative approaches. Meta-analysis was not performed due to significant heterogeneity and lack of comparative studies.

RESULTS

The most common indications for revision were aseptic loosening (n = 929) and polyethylene wear (n = 158). The majority of the studies (n = 11/21) performed primarily acetabular revision or head-liner exchanges. Half the revisions (50.6%; n = 823/1627) included femoral revisions (35.2%; n = 573/1627) or combined femoral-acetabular revisions (15.4%; n = 250/1627). However, 80.6% (n = 462/573) of femoral revisions were from two non-comparative studies. Among the five comparative studies, two included femoral or combined revisions with significantly more performed using the posterior approach. Three of the five comparative studies did not find the DAA protective against postoperative dislocation. The overall complication rate was 14.0%; periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 106), dislocation (n = 80), and infection (n = 36) were most common. Fourteen studies reported patient-reported outcome measures, demonstrating consistent improvements following revision THA.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data on revision DAA THA are limited due to their retrospective nature. They demonstrate the ability to safely perform acetabular and head-liner revisions in carefully selected patients. Comparative studies lack femoral revisions, show a propensity for femoral fractures, and exhibit selection bias. Higher-quality, comparative prospective studies are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD4202236457.

Do the porous custom implants have a position consistent with the planning and allow anatomical reconstruction of hip center of rotation in complex acetabular revisions Paprosky III?

INTRODUCTION

In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the advent of porous custom-made triflange acetabular implants with 3D scan planning offers a new perspective to improve implantation accuracy and anatomical restoration of the center of rotation (COR). This issue was investigated using CT-scan as the measurement tool, but in limited series (±10 cases) and without investigating the factors that may influence errors in positioning. Therefore we performed a retrospective study aiming to: (1) assess the placement accuracy of such implants with respect to the preoperative planning, (2) examine whether the volume of bone to be resected in order to apply the implant had an impact on this accuracy, (3) assess if errors in position at surgery had any influence on function, complications and survival.

HYPOTHESIS

Preoperative planning could be accurately reproduced when implanting porous custom-made acetabular implants, and that accuracy would decrease in proportion to the volume of bone to be resected METHOD: Twenty patients undergoing THA revision with porous custom-made acetabular implants were included in this single-center retrospective study. Mean follow-up was 17.9 months ± 9.4 [2-45.1]. Preoperative planning was performed using 3D scanographic modeling. A post-operative CT scan was performed to assess implantation accuracy in terms of orientation and COR restitution. Demographic data, Oxford scores, complications and survival were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean deviation from the preoperative planning in inclination, anteversion and rotation were 4.3 ° ± 2.5, 6.1 ° ± 4.7, and 7 ° ± 4.6, respectively. Restoration of the COR showed a mean deviation of 2.1 ± 1.3 mm anteroposteriorly, 2.5 ± 2 mm mediolaterally and 2.2 ± 1.3 mm proximodistally. In total, 45% (9/20) of implants were positioned with perfect restoration of orientation (±10 °) and COR (±5 mm). The mean planned bone resection was 8.1 ± 4.9 cm3, with placement accuracy and COR restitution decreasing significantly when the volume of bone to be resected exceeded 2.7 cm3. One dislocation was found (5%, 1/20). Survival at last follow-up was 100%, the mean Oxford score at follow-up was 31.7 ± 7.9 [16-52], without being influenced by errors in position or COR restitution.

CONCLUSION

In total 45% of the implants restored an orientation and a COR as planned, particularly when the volume of bone to be resected is less than 2.7 cm3. Although these are complex cases with large amounts of bone loss, 3D manufacturing could give us hope of greater precision. The link between better precision and low bone resection volume could be an area to develop with the manufacturer in order to improve results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; diagnostic using CT in transversal retrospective study.

Outcomes Following Revision for Mechanically Assisted Crevice Corrosion in a Single Femoral Design

BACKGROUND

Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) is a described complication following metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasty (THA). The literature regarding outcomes following revision for MACC suggests that complication rates are high. The purpose of this investigation is to add to this literature with the largest reported series to date.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 552 consecutive patients who underwent 621 MoP primary THAs. We identified patients who subsequently underwent revision THA for a diagnosis of MACC. All patients were implanted with the same implant combination (Accolade I stem/cobalt-chromium low friction ion treatment femoral head). Patient demographic, surgical, and laboratory data were collected. Follow-up was calculated from the revision surgery and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement and hip subjective values (HSV) were examined at final follow-up. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

The revision rate for MACC was 11.6% and mean time to revision was 6.6 (±2.4) years. Revised patients (n = 69) had a mean preoperative serum cobalt-chromium ratio of 3.5 (±2.4). There were 8 cases of gross trunnion failure. At mean 3.2 (±1.9) years following revision, the overall major complication rate was 11.6% with a 5.8% reoperation rate. At final follow-up, mean Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement scores were 83.2 (±15.6) and mean hip subjective value was 77.6 (±17.4). Revision resulted in significant increases in both parameters (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of MACC in MoP THA is likely higher than previously reported, particularly for certain implant combinations. Revision surgery for MACC can achieve good outcomes but a high clinical suspicion with early detection and revision is likely key to success.

Preoperative ultrasound to map the three-dimensional anatomical distribution of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty

Background

The postoperative complaints of hypoesthesia or a burning sensation due to lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury in patients are not yet solved. The present study aimed to identify the three-dimensional (3D) distribution of LFCN using preoperative ultrasound and evaluate the rate of injury in direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

A total of 59 patients (28 males and 31 females, age 69.0 ± 4.6 years, BMI 24.7 ± 3.0 kg/m²) were randomly allocated to the ultrasound group and 58 patients (28 males and 30 females, age 68.5 ± 4.5 years, BMI 24.8 ± 2.8 kg/m²) were in the control group. Surgeons received the data of 3D distribution of LFCN only in the ultrasound group before surgery with respect to the direction, the depth on the skin, and the length to tensor fasciae latae (TFL). The anatomical characteristics of LFCN in the surgical region were summarized. At 1 and 3 months of post surgery, the rate of LFCN injury and abnormal sensitive area was evaluated in both groups.

Results

There was a significant consistency in gender, age and BMI of these two groups (P > 0.05). Based on the data from the ultrasound group, over 90% of patients had one or two branches of LFCN. LFCN always courses in the fascia layer, the depth ranged from 6.8 ± 2.6 (3.0–12.0) mm to 11.1 ± 3.4 (4.0–17.0) mm and depended on the thickness of the subcutaneous fat, and length was 3.3 ± 4.6 (− 5.0–10.0) mm at proximal part and − 2.7 ± 4.7 (− 10.0–8.0) at distal end to the medial edge of TFL. Both the rate of LFCN injury and abnormal sensory area in the ultrasound group was significantly lower than those in the control group (3.4% vs. 25.9%, P = 0.001, at 1 month; 3.4% vs. 22.4%, P = 0.005, at 3 months).

Conclusions

LFCN mostly courses along the medial border of TFL in the fascia layer. The 3D distribution of LFCN using preoperative ultrasound mapping could help the surgeons to evaluate the risk of injury preoperatively and decrease the rate of injury during the operation. However, some branch injuries, especially for the fan type LFCN, could not be avoided.

Intraoperative Radiographic Detection of Intrapelvic Acetabular Screw Penetration: Lessons Learned From Our Trauma Colleagues

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative vascular injury during total hip arthroplasty represents a catastrophic complication. Acetabular screw placement represents one possible mode of injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of various fluoroscopic views in the detection of intrapelvic screw penetration.

METHODS

A radiopaque pelvis Sawbones model was instrumented with a hemispherical acetabular component. Four intrapelvic quadrants were defined. Screws were placed, 3 in each quadrant, and imaged sequentially at 3 depths: 0 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm penetrated. Eight fluoroscopic images were used: anteroposterior, inlet, outlet, iliac oblique, obturator oblique, "down the wing," obturator outlet, and a "quad" view. Three blinded, independent surgeons evaluated the images for intrapelvic screw penetration. Images were analyzed in isolation and as a "triple-shot series" consisting of the "quad," obturator outlet, and iliac oblique views. Sensitivity and specificity values were then calculated.

RESULTS

In isolation, the "quad" view had the highest sensitivity for screw penetration (62%). The triple-shot series was found to be 100% sensitive in all 4 quadrants for detecting 10 mm of screw penetration. The specificity of the series was found to be 100% in all quadrants except for the posterior superior quadrant where it was 67%. Interobserver agreement approached perfection (Kappa ≥0.947) between all surgeons (P < .001) when using the 3-view series.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to assess the use of fluoroscopy in the detection of intrapelvic penetration of transacetabular screws. We found that a 3-radiograph series provided a sensitive and specific metric for the detection of intrapelvic screw penetration.